1. The Spitler Group LLC Human Capital Development BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS Bing G. Spitler Spitler Group LLC (513) 382-7675
2. The Spitler Group LLC Human Capital Development BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS Bing G. Spitler Spitler Group LLC (513) 382-7675
3. Contents The History of Assessments Reliability and Validity Types of Assessments What to Look for in an Assessment How Assessments can Improve Hiring
8. Dr. William Marston In 1928 published Emotions of Normal People, DiSC Theory . Marston’s two axes, Passive or Active, Favorable or Antagonistic. Dominance Inducement Compliance Steadiness Interpretation of Marston’s Theory by Dr John Geier
9. Stanley Smith Stevens Psychologist “ Scales of Measurement” More accurate measurements of behavior
10. Myers-Briggs Type Indicators Isabel Briggs Myers and her mother, Katharine Briggs, developed to make the insights of type theory accessible to individuals and groups. Introvert (I) – Extrovert (E) Sensing (S) – Intuition (N) Thinking (T) – Feeling (F) Judging (J) – Perceiving (P) 16 personality Type Indicators
11. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing is a set of Testing standards developed jointly by: The American Educational Research Association (AERA) American Psychological Association (APA), and The National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME).
12. Leading Clinical Psychological Research Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) California Psychological Inventory (CPI) The validity of assessments are often compared to the results of the clinical studies
13. TESTING AND ASSESSMENT: AN EMPLOYER’S GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration 1999
14. Department of Labor Assessment instruments should account for no more than one-third (1/3) of the decision making process.
21. Tests, inventories, and procedures are assessment tools that may be used to measure an individual’s abilities, values, and personality traits. They are components of the assessment process. ! observations ! resume evaluations ! application blanks/questionnaires ! interviews ! drug tests ! biodata inventories ! work samples/performance tests ! achievement tests ! general ability tests ! specific ability tests ! Cognitive abilities tests ! physical ability tests ! assessment centers ! personality inventories ! honesty/integrity inventories ! interest inventories ! work values inventories Assessment process Systematic approach to combining and evaluating all the information gained from testing and using it to make career or employment-related decisions. Types of Assessments
22. Ipsative Assessments Ipsative assessments are behavioral based instruments based on Jung and Marston type work. Recognized by the four quadrants of behavior. Excellent for training purposes but not recommended for hiring – Myers Briggs and DiSC. Generally require interpretation by a trained professional for hiring purposes. Low predictability Amiable Expressive Feeler Extrovert Analytical Driver Thinker Judge
26. 1) Personality indicators Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Kersey-bates Temperament Jung Type Indicators 2) Personality Style The Marston 4 Quadrant Theory – DiSC Wilson Learning Challey Predictive Index The Brickman 3) Personality Traits MMPI 16 PF Hogan 4) Honesty/Integrity Reid/London House Profiles International: Step One Survey II 5 Groups of Assessments
30. Companies Face Two Types of Problems… Behavioral Assessments focuses on people problems People Problems System Problems
31.
32. Motivate Employees Identify Reliable People Minimize Workplace Theft Improve Productivity Hire The Right People Increase Sales Reduce Turnover Make Managers More Effective
33. When do people perform at a ‘Superior Level?” It’s not experience – or college degree – or other accepted factors… … it hinges on fit with the job.” Source: Herbert
34. The closer to 100% information the better… Interview + Background Check + Personality & behavior + Mental Abilities + Interests & Motivators + Job Matching
35. They also stay longer – saving a fortune on recruitment costs! 8% 34% % left / fired after 14 months 5% 25% % left / fired after 6 months Low Turnover Industry 28% 57% % left / fired after 14 months 24% 46% % left / fired after 6 months With Job Match With out Job Match High Turnover Industry
36. The Lines Are Crossing: A Growing Shortage of Workers in the U.S. Expected Labor Force and Labor Force Demand Millions of People
38. The missing third is... “ Checking the Past” & “Reviewing the Present” … in predicting ‘superior’ performance Company Fit Attitudes,Values, Demeanor, Appearance, Integrity Skill Fit Education, Training, Experience, Skills, Etc. Job Match Personality, Abilities, Interests
39. A ssessment Sample Step One Survey II Pre-employment 72 Questions Profiles International, Inc.
47. Here’s what you see & hire/promote… Here’s what you get!
48. The Spitler Group LLC BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS Bing G. Spitler Spitler Group LLC 513 382-7675
49. Contents The History of Assessments Department of Labor Reliability and Validity Types of Assessments What to Look for in an Assessment How Assessments can Improve Hiring
54. Dr. William Marston In 1928 published Emotions of Normal People, DiSC Theory . Marston’s two axes, Passive or Active, Favorable or Antagonistic. Dominance Inducement Compliance Steadiness Interpretation of Marston’s Theory by Dr John Geier
55. Stanley Smith Stevens Psychologist “ Scales of Measurement” More accurate measurements of behavior
56. Myers-Briggs Type Indicators Isabel Briggs Myers and her mother, Katharine Briggs, developed to make the insights of type theory accessible to individuals and groups. Introvert (I) – Extrovert (E) Sensing (S) – Intuition (N) Thinking (T) – Feeling (F) Judging (J) – Perceiving (P) 16 personality Type Indicators
57. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing is a set of Testing standards developed jointly by: The American Educational Research Association (AERA) American Psychological Association (APA), and The National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME).
58. Leading Clinical Psychological Research Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) California Psychological Inventory (CPI) The validity of assessments are often compared to the results of the clinical studies
59. TESTING AND ASSESSMENT: AN EMPLOYER’S GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration 1999
60. Department of Labor “ The Rule” Assessment instruments should account for no more than one-third (1/3) of the decision making process.
67. Tests, inventories, and procedures are assessment tools that may be used to measure an individual’s abilities, values, and personality traits. They are components of the assessment process. ! observations ! resume evaluations ! application blanks/questionnaires ! interviews ! drug tests ! biodata inventories ! work samples/performance tests ! achievement tests ! general ability tests ! specific ability tests ! ! medical tests ! physical ability tests ! assessment centers ! personality inventories ! honesty/integrity inventories ! interest inventories ! work values inventories Assessment process Systematic approach to combining and evaluating all the information gained from testing and using it to make career or employment-related decisions. Types of Assessments
68. Ipsative Assessments Ipsative assessments are behavioral based instruments based on Jung and Marston type work. Recognized by the four quadrants of behavior. Excellent for training purposes but not recommended for hiring – Myers Briggs and DiSC. Generally require interpretation by a trained professional for hiring purposes. Low predictability Amiable Expressive Feeler Extrovert Analytical Driver Thinker Judge
72. 1) Personality indicators Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Kersey-bates Temperament Jung Type Indicators 2) Personality Style The Marston 4 Quadrant Theory – DiSC Wilson Learning Challey Predictive Index The Brickman 3) Personality Traits MMPI 16 PF Hogan 4) Honesty/Integrity Reid/London House Profiles International: Step One Survey II 5 Groups of Assessments
76. Companies Face Two Types of Problems… Assessments focuses on people problems. People Problems System Problems
77.
78. Motivate Employees Identify Reliable People Minimize Workplace Theft Improve Productivity Hire The Right People Increase Sales Reduce Turnover Make Managers More Effective
79. When do people perform at a ‘Superior Level?” It’s not experience – or college degree – or other accepted factors… … it hinges on fit with the job.” Source: Herbert
80. The closer to 100% information the better… Interview + Background Check + Personality & behavior + Mental Abilities + Interests & Motivators + Job Matching
81. They also stay longer – saving a fortune on recruitment costs! 8% 34% % left / fired after 14 months 5% 25% % left / fired after 6 months Low Turnover Industry 28% 57% % left / fired after 14 months 24% 46% % left / fired after 6 months With Job Match With out Job Match High Turnover Industry
82. The Lines Are Crossing: A Growing Shortage of Workers in the U.S. Expected Labor Force and Labor Force Demand Millions of People
84. The missing third is... “ Checking the Past” & “Reviewing the Present” … in predicting ‘superior’ performance Company Fit Attitudes,Values, Demeanor, Appearance, Integrity Skill Fit Education, Training, Experience, Skills, Etc. Job Match Personality, Abilities, Interests
85. A ssessment Sample Step One Survey II Pre-employment 72 Questions Profiles International, Inc.
93. Here’s what you see & hire/promote… Here’s what you get!
94. The Spitler Group LLC BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS Bing G. Spitler Spitler Group LLC 513 382-7675
95. Why does this matter? Unskilled / Semi-skilled ‘ Average’ workers output = 19% more than ‘Non-producers’ ‘ Superior’ workers output = 19% more than ‘ Average’ ‘ Superior’ Why does this matter? orders output = 38% more than Non-producers’ Skilled ‘ Average’ workers output = 32% more than ‘Non-producers’ ‘ Superior’ workers output = 32% more than ‘ Average’ ‘ Superior’ workers output = 64% more than Non-producers’ Management / Professional ‘ Average’ workers output = 48% more than ‘Non-producers’ ‘ Superior’ workers output = 48% more than ‘ Average’ ‘ Superior’ workers output = 96% more than ‘Non-producers Source: “The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings” Psychological Bulletin, Sept 1998, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp 262-274.
Notas do Editor
The Profile is a three-part assessment. It compares individuals to customized Job Match patterns in order to predict Job Success by assessing Thinking Style, Occupational Interests, and Behavioral Traits.
The Profile is a three-part assessment. It compares individuals to customized Job Match patterns in order to predict Job Success by assessing Thinking Style, Occupational Interests, and Behavioral Traits.
This is an example of a Job Match Pattern. The shaded areas indicate the pattern you want your job candidates to match. These patterns are always customized to fit the jobs in your company because they are based on the qualities and characteristics of the people who are your best employees. The pattern is a composite of the shared characteristics of the people who are the best performers in this particular job. By hiring people who have comparable characteristics, you bring people into your organization that are just like the people who perform the best for you. This is Job Match, and it is your best method for predicting Job Success.
For example, this graph represents good Job Match. The shaded areas are the Job Match Pattern, and the numbers are the applicant’s scores. The numbers within the shaded areas indicate Job Match. You can tell at a glance whether or not a job candidate is like your best employees. Do you see how easy it is to use The Profile ?
The Profile is a three-part assessment. It compares individuals to customized Job Match patterns in order to predict Job Success by assessing Thinking Style, Occupational Interests, and Behavioral Traits.
The Profile is a three-part assessment. It compares individuals to customized Job Match patterns in order to predict Job Success by assessing Thinking Style, Occupational Interests, and Behavioral Traits.
This is an example of a Job Match Pattern. The shaded areas indicate the pattern you want your job candidates to match. These patterns are always customized to fit the jobs in your company because they are based on the qualities and characteristics of the people who are your best employees. The pattern is a composite of the shared characteristics of the people who are the best performers in this particular job. By hiring people who have comparable characteristics, you bring people into your organization that are just like the people who perform the best for you. This is Job Match, and it is your best method for predicting Job Success.
For example, this graph represents good Job Match. The shaded areas are the Job Match Pattern, and the numbers are the applicant’s scores. The numbers within the shaded areas indicate Job Match. You can tell at a glance whether or not a job candidate is like your best employees. Do you see how easy it is to use The Profile ?