SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 100
Baixar para ler offline
TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2016
R E S U L T S
TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2016
RESULTS
4TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2016
Academic Engineers and Architects in Finland
TEK and Finnish universities of technology to­
gether conduct a yearly feedback survey for
graduated academic engineers and architects.
The feedback and results are utilized in deve­
loping university education and influencing the
educational policy making.
TEK is responsible for accomplishing the survey
and the universities are responsible for reaching
their new graduates.
The survey is directed by a Directory Board having
a representative from every participating uni­
versity.
SURVEY THEMES
1.	 Basics
2.	 Studies
3.	 Skills and expertise: Importance	
and development
4.	 Support and guidance
5.	 Master’s Thesis
6.	 Working along studies
7.	 Employment
8.	 Satisfaction with the studies
More information, results and
resources:
www.tek.fi/vastavalmistuneet
Contact:
Arttu Piri, Analyst, TEK: arttu.piri@tek.fi
5 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
PARTICIPATING UNIVERSITIES AND SCHOOLS
UNIVERSITIES AND SCHOOLS		 IN RESULTS AND GRAPHS
1.	 Aalto University 				 Aalto ALL	
School of Chemical Engineering		 Aalto CHEM	
School of Electrical Engineering		 Aalto ELEC	
School of Engineering			 Aalto ENG	
School of Science				 Aalto SCI	
School of Arts, Design and Architecture
2.	 Tampere University of Technology		 TUT
3.	 Lappeenranta University of Technology	 LUT
4.	 Oulu University				OU	
5.	 Turku University				TU
6.	 Vaasa University				VU
7.	 Åbo Akademi University			 ÅAU
1.	BASICS
Response rates and the number of graduates in 2016
Gender
Nationality
Ages
8TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
RESPONSE RATES AND THE NUMBER
OF GRADUATES IN 2016
ALL Aalto
CHEM
Aalto
ELEC
Aalto
ENG
Aalto
SCI
Aalto
ALL
TUT LUT UO UT UV ÅAU
Responses
2016 2120 112 294 342 257 1007 638 233 161 24 26 33
Graduates
2016 3115 179 384 420 323 1364 835 410 360 72 52 48
Response rate
2016 68 % 63 % 77 % 81 % 80 % 74 % 76 % 57 % 45 % 33 % 50 % 69 %
9 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
RESPONSE RATES AND THE NUMBER
OF GRADUATES IN 2016
Distribution of new graduates in technology 2016 by university
Aalto ALL, 42 % TUT, 27 %
LUT, 13 % UO, 12 %
UT, 2 % UV, 2 % ÅAU, 1 %
10TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
GENDER
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
2120 112 294 342 257 1007 638 233 161 24 26 33
Female 24% 38% 14% 23% 24% 22% 26% 21% 31% 13% 19% 18%
Male 76% 62% 86% 77% 76% 78% 74% 79% 69% 88% 81% 82%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
11 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
NATIONALITY
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
2120 112 294 342 257 1007 638 233 161 24 26 33
Other outside EU 14% 13% 14% 7% 16% 12% 14% 20% 8% 33% 19% 24%
Other within EU 3% 4% 3% 3% 8% 5% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 3%
Finnish 83% 83% 83% 90% 76% 83% 84% 78% 93% 67% 81% 73%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
12TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
AGES
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
40-39383736353433323130292827262524- 23
Age
Year of birth - > 1982: 9 %
Year of birth 1982 - >: 91 %
2.	STUDIES
B.Sc. studies
M.Sc. studies
Studying abroad
Delays in studies or graduation
16TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
B.SC. STUDIES
Absence during the Bachelor's degree studies, semesters ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1757 98 250 290 217 857 527 166 146 21 18 24
Over 2 6% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% 7% 5% 10% 5% 11% 0%
2 12% 5% 14% 10% 16% 12% 14% 5% 8% 5% 11% 0%
1 11% 8% 9% 13% 12% 11% 13% 8% 4% 5% 11% 0%
None 72% 82% 72% 72% 66% 72% 66% 81% 77% 86% 67% 100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
17 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
Degree and the awarding institution before Master’s studies? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n= Aalto
CHEM, n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto ALL,
n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 975 100 279 320 240 940 602 221 141 21 25 26
Other 7% 7% 5% 6% 6% 6% 6% 13% 7% 14% 17% 8%
Bachelor of Engineering (Insinööri AMK) 14% 8% 10% 14% 9% 11% 11% 32% 4% 29% 29% 35%
B.Sc. (Tech), another university 12% 11% 12% 7% 18% 12% 12% 15% 7% 24% 4% 12%
B.Sc. (Tech), current university 69% 75% 75% 75% 69% 73% 72% 43% 82% 33% 54% 46%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
B.SC. STUDIES
18TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
Absence during your M.Sc. degree studies, semesters ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1963 105 271 317 238 933 605 207 145 23 24 28
Over 2 5% 2% 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 4% 0% 4%
2 4% 1% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% 5% 2% 0% 0% 4%
1 6% 0% 5% 4% 7% 5% 8% 9% 2% 4% 0% 4%
None 86% 97% 85% 88% 84% 87% 83% 81% 89% 91% 100% 89%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
M.SC. STUDIES
19 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
Studies abroad during your B.Sc. and M.Sc. studies, months ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1976 109 274 322 238 945 600 209 152 23 21 28
Over 12 5% 3% 4% 3% 10% 5% 4% 5% 3% 4% 0% 0%
7-12 8% 5% 6% 11% 8% 8% 10% 10% 3% 17% 0% 0%
1-6 22% 28% 19% 24% 24% 23% 20% 25% 25% 13% 0% 25%
0 65% 65% 72% 62% 58% 64% 66% 61% 69% 65% 100% 75%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
STUDIES ABROAD
20TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
DELAYS IN STUDIES OR GRADUATION
Do you feel that your studies or graduation were delayed by some reason? ©TEK Graduate
Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
2 013 109 278 327 237 953 615 216 154 24 23 30
Yes, over 12 months 32% 19% 40% 32% 34% 33% 34% 24% 34% 42% 26% 7%
Yes, 7 -12 months 13% 16% 11% 10% 11% 11% 14% 14% 16% 4% 9% 13%
Yes, 1 -6 months 26% 25% 23% 26% 23% 24% 26% 31% 27% 17% 13% 37%
No 29% 40% 26% 32% 32% 31% 26% 32% 23% 38% 52% 43%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
21 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
DELAYS IN STUDIES OR GRADUATION
Reason for the delay ALL, n= Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI,
n=
Aalto
ALL,
n=
TUT,
n=
LUT,
n=
UO,
n=
UT,
n=
UV,
n=
ÅAU,
n=
421 65 207 221 162 657 457 148 118 15 11 17
Working during the studies. 57 % 38 % 65 % 52 % 63 % 58 % 56 % 59 % 47 % 53 % 100 % 47 %
Delay in finding a place or subject for the thesis work. 29 % 31 % 29 % 33 % 17 % 28 % 33 % 28 % 32 % 7 % 27 % 18 %
Insufficient motivation for studies. 21 % 20 % 26 % 19 % 15 % 20 % 20 % 18 % 28 % 13 % 27 % 29 %
Other matters related to master’s thesis or graduation. 15 % 25 % 9 % 19 % 16 % 16 % 14 % 17 % 10 % 27 % 27 % 29 %
Overlaps and incompatibilities in the course schedules. 13 % 22 % 18 % 14 % 8 % 15 % 12 % 14 % 11 % 7 % 9 % 0 %
Personal issues, eg. health problems. 10 % 9 % 12 % 8 % 9 % 10 % 11 % 11 % 10 % 27 % 9 % 6 %
Spending time as an exchange student. 10 % 5 % 4 % 10 % 7 % 7 % 14 % 13 % 7 % 7 % 0 % 12 %
Insufficient master’s thesis guidance. 9 % 17 % 11 % 9 % 15 % 12 % 7 % 5 % 5 % 20 % 9 % 6 %
Insufficient study guidance. 8 % 8 % 14 % 10 % 6 % 10 % 6 % 4 % 5 % 0 % 0 % 12 %
Taking part in the student organization(s’) activities. 7 % 6 % 9 % 5 % 7 % 7 % 7 % 6 % 7 % 0 % 9 % 6 %
Military or civil service. 7 % 3 % 8 % 9 % 8 % 8 % 7 % 3 % 8 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
Insufficient studying skills. 6 % 12 % 6 % 7 % 6 % 7 % 5 % 2 % 10 % 0 % 9 % 0 %
Not having a job to take up after graduating. 5 % 0 % 5 % 3 % 4 % 4 % 5 % 5 % 3 % 27 % 0 % 24 %
Changing the course of the studies or taking additional courses. 4 % 2 % 4 % 5 % 7 % 5 % 4 % 2 % 3 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
Family issues. 4 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 4 % 3 % 4 % 1 % 4 % 7 % 9 % 0 %
Some other reason. 3 % 2 % 6 % 2 % 3 % 4 % 3 % 4 % 3 % 7 % 0 % 6 %
Professional sports. 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 9 % 0 %
3.	 EXPERTISE AND SKILLS:
	 IMPORTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT
Expertise and skills: Importance
Expertise and skills: Development due to studies
Expertise and skills: Development due to work experience
Importance of work experience
Value of activity within societies and organizations (eg. Student Union)
24TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
1. Importance
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Aalto CHEM, n= 101
Aalto ELEC, n= 259
Aalto ENG, n= 291
Aalto SCI, n= 221
TUT, n= 610
LUT, n= 193
UO, n= 139
UT, n= 22
UV, n= 24
ÅAU, n= 24
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
25 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
2. Development in studies
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
ALL, n= 1 884 1. Importance
Aalto CHEM, n= 101
Aalto ELEC, n= 259
Aalto ENG, n= 291
Aalto SCI, n= 221
TUT, n= 610
LUT, n= 193
UO, n= 139
UT, n= 22
UV, n= 24
ÅAU, n= 24
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
26TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
3. Development in work
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
ALL, n= 1 884 1. Importance
Aalto CHEM, n= 101
Aalto ELEC, n= 259
Aalto ENG, n= 291
Aalto SCI, n= 221
TUT, n= 610
LUT, n= 193
UO, n= 139
UT, n= 22
UV, n= 24
ÅAU, n= 24
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
27 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
FACTORS OF EXPERTICE
Internationality Social skills Business and
Management
Expertice and substance
knowledge
Working Life Skills Analytical skills
Skills related to international
work environment
Social skills Basics of business
operations
Know-how of own field Problem solving Critical thinking
Foreign languages Team working Entrepreneurial
capacities
Mathematical and
natural science
Time management
and prioritizing
Analytical thinking
Oral
communication
Sustainable
development
Knowledge of the of
research own field
Attitude towards
developing own skills
Creativity
Leadership Information
retrieval
Self-confidence
Project management Self-knowledge
Practical application
of theories Ethicality
Not included in the factors:
Written communication
Career management capacities
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
28TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
Factors of expertice (mean), ALL ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
Business &
Management
Expertise &
Substance
Internationality Social Skills
Working Life
Skills
Analytical Skills
IMPORTANCE 4,58 4,85 5,15 5,34 5,53 5,18
DEVELOPMENT IN STUDIES 3,79 4,98 4,38 4,39 4,71 4,53
DEVELOPMENT IN WORK 3,76 4,16 4,11 4,49 4,86 4,51
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
5,00
5,50
6,00
DEVELOPMENT IN STUDIES
29 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
ALL, n= 1 884
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
3. Development in work
2. Development in studies
1. Importance
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
30TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
Aalto CHEM, n= 101
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
31 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
Aalto ELEC, n= 259
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
32TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
Aalto ENG, n= 291
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
33 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
Aalto SCI, n= 221
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
34TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
Aalto ALL, n= 874
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
35 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
TUT, n= 610
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
36TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
LUT, n= 193
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
37 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
UO, n= 139
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
38TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
UT, n= 22
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
39 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
UV, n= 24
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
40TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. Know-how
of own field
2. Knowledge of the research of own field
3. Mathematical and natural science
4. Practical application of theories
5. Sustainable development
6. Basics of business operations
7. Entrepreneurial capacities
8. Problem solving
9. Information retrieval
10. Foreign languages
11. Skills related to international
work environment
12. Management skills
13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude
towards developing
own skills
15. Career management capacities
16. Written communication
17. Oral communication
18. Leadership
19. Team working
20. Social skills
21. Self-knowledge
22. Self-confidence
23. Creativity
24. Critical thinking
25. Analytical thinking
26. Ethicality
ÅAU, n= 24
1=Not at all (important)
2=Very little
3=Little
4=Somewhat
5=Much
6=Very much
(7=Cannot answer)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Importance
2. Development in studies
3. Development in work
EXPERTICE AND SKILLS
41 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
THE IMPORTANCE OF WORK EXPERIENCE
How useful do you consider the study related practise/
work experience that you gained during your studies?
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 849 98 261 284 216 861 604 182 135 22 24 23
Cannot say 4% 1% 6% 4% 3% 4% 5% 8% 2% 5% 0% 0%
Not at all useful 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0%
Only little useful 5% 7% 3% 5% 2% 4% 5% 7% 4% 18% 8% 22%
Useful 26% 27% 23% 24% 21% 23% 27% 29% 29% 27% 33% 48%
Very useful 65% 65% 67% 67% 74% 69% 63% 57% 64% 50% 58% 30%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
42TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
Have you participated in student union – or other organizational
activites (also outside the university) or worked in university
administration as student representative during your studies?
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 846 98 261 285 216 862 602 180 136 22 23 23
Yes 41% 40% 47% 46% 52% 47% 34% 35% 33% 46% 30% 65%
No 59% 60% 53% 54% 48% 53% 66% 65% 67% 55% 70% 35%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
THE IMPORTANCE OF WORK EXPERIENCE
43 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
THE IMPORTANCE OF WORK EXPERIENCE
How useful do you consider this to have been for your (professional)
development?
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT,
n=
LUT,
n=
UO, n= UT, n= UV, n=
ÅAU,
n=
1 839 97 261 282 216 858 601 180 133 22 24 23
Did not participate / Cannot say 50% 47% 45% 48% 38% 44% 56% 50% 63% 41% 50% 13%
Not at all useful 3% 5% 5% 2% 4% 4% 2% 1% 2% 5% 0% 4%
Only little useful 11% 8% 15% 13% 10% 13% 10% 11% 7% 18% 21% 13%
Useful 20% 21% 17% 21% 24% 21% 19% 21% 17% 18% 25% 48%
Very useful 16% 19% 18% 16% 24% 19% 13% 17% 12% 18% 4% 22%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
4.	 SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
Level of support and councelling
Finding support
Information on career planning and job markets
46TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
1. I feel comfortable at my university. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 832 97 259 283 214 855 601 175 135 22 24 22
Unable to answer 1% 0% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%
I agree 72% 63% 61% 70% 70% 67% 76% 85% 70% 77% 75% 86%
I somewhat agree 18% 29% 22% 19% 18% 21% 16% 11% 22% 14% 25% 5%
I somewhat disagree 7% 8% 10% 7% 8% 8% 6% 3% 6% 5% 0% 9%
I disagree 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 5% 0% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
47 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
2. I am satisfied with my studies. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 834 97 258 283 214 854 601 177 135 22 24 23
Unable to answer 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
I agree 53% 50% 51% 55% 59% 54% 50% 62% 49% 64% 58% 52%
I somewhat agree 32% 34% 25% 33% 29% 29% 35% 27% 38% 27% 38% 35%
I somewhat disagree 11% 16% 16% 10% 9% 12% 12% 10% 10% 9% 0% 9%
I disagree 3% 1% 7% 3% 2% 4% 3% 1% 3% 0% 4% 4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
48TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
3. I have had enough guidance available to do my masters thesis. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 831 97 258 285 211 853 604 174 134 22 24 22
Unable to answer 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0%
I agree 55% 45% 54% 53% 58% 54% 53% 61% 61% 64% 67% 59%
I somewhat agree 28% 27% 24% 29% 25% 26% 32% 25% 25% 27% 25% 27%
I somewhat disagree 12% 22% 15% 13% 7% 13% 11% 12% 11% 5% 8% 14%
I disagree 4% 4% 6% 4% 8% 6% 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
49 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
4. I have had enough guidance available to plan my studies. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 830 97 258 283 213 853 601 175 134 22 24 23
Unable to answer 2% 1% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 4%
I agree 50% 30% 43% 38% 55% 42% 55% 63% 57% 50% 67% 39%
I somewhat agree 31% 41% 30% 34% 29% 32% 31% 26% 28% 41% 21% 35%
I somewhat disagree 13% 22% 18% 19% 9% 16% 10% 9% 13% 5% 4% 17%
I disagree 4% 6% 7% 7% 5% 6% 2% 2% 2% 5% 8% 4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
50TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
5. If needed, I would always know the person to whom I can ask help for.©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 831 96 259 283 213 853 601 176 134 22 24 23
Unable to answer 3% 2% 6% 3% 3% 4% 3% 1% 4% 0% 0% 4%
I agree 62% 49% 53% 51% 70% 56% 65% 72% 69% 59% 71% 70%
I somewhat agree 26% 34% 25% 33% 18% 27% 26% 20% 22% 41% 25% 13%
I somewhat disagree 8% 13% 14% 10% 5% 10% 6% 7% 5% 0% 4% 13%
I disagree 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
51 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
6. I was satisfied with the opportunies I had to influence
and participate in my university.
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 831 97 258 285 213 855 597 177 135 22 24 23
Unable to answer 18 % 20 % 25 % 19 % 16 % 20 % 17 % 11 % 24 % 18 % 17 % 4 %
I agree 39 % 30 % 35 % 28 % 41 % 34 % 43 % 54 % 37 % 36 % 29 % 30 %
I somewhat agree 32 % 30 % 24 % 37 % 33 % 31 % 31 % 33 % 30 % 32 % 38 % 52 %
I somewhat disagree 9 % 16 % 12 % 14 % 7 % 12 % 8 % 2 % 7 % 14 % 8 % 13 %
I disagree 2 % 5 % 4 % 2 % 4 % 3 % 2 % 0 % 2 % 0 % 8 % 0 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
52TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
7. I was satisfied with the communication I had with the teaching staff. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 834 97 259 285 213 856 600 177 135 22 23 23
Unable to answer 2 % 2 % 3 % 3 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 4 %
I agree 49 % 50 % 42 % 44 % 49 % 45 % 48 % 59 % 56 % 68 % 39 % 74 %
I somewhat agree 35 % 36 % 37 % 35 % 36 % 36 % 36 % 33 % 30 % 23 % 52 % 13 %
I somewhat disagree 11 % 9 % 14 % 14 % 9 % 12 % 12 % 5 % 10 % 5 % 4 % 4 %
I disagree 3 % 3 % 5 % 3 % 4 % 4 % 2 % 1 % 3 % 5 % 4 % 4 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
53 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
8. The feedback I received from the teaching staff has helped me
with my studies.
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 832 97 258 282 212 851 603 176 135 22 24 23
Unable to answer 4 % 0 % 4 % 5 % 1 % 3 % 5 % 4 % 2 % 9 % 0 % 9 %
I agree 36 % 44 % 33 % 32 % 40 % 36 % 33 % 46 % 30 % 55 % 54 % 61 %
I somewhat agree 37 % 35 % 36 % 33 % 34 % 35 % 41 % 34 % 45 % 27 % 42 % 17 %
I somewhat disagree 17 % 14 % 18 % 23 % 18 % 19 % 17 % 15 % 18 % 5 % 4 % 9 %
I disagree 5 % 6 % 9 % 6 % 7 % 7 % 4 % 1 % 4 % 5 % 0 % 4 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
54TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
Level of support and guidance, ALL n=1832 ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. I feel
comfortable
at my
university.
2. I am
satisfied with
my studies.
3. I have had
enough
guidance
available to
do my
masters
thesis.
4. I have had
enough
guidance
available to
plan my
studies.
5. If needed,
I would
always know
the person to
whom I can
ask help for.
6. I was
satisfied
with the
opportunies
I had to
influence
and
participate
in my
university.
7. I was
satisfied
with the
communicati
on I had with
the teaching
staff.
8. The
feedback I
received
from the
teaching
staff has
helped me
with my
studies.
Unable to answer 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 18% 2% 4%
I disagree 2% 3% 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 5%
I somewhat disagree 7% 11% 12% 13% 8% 9% 11% 17%
I somewhat agree 18% 32% 28% 31% 26% 32% 35% 37%
I agree 72% 53% 55% 50% 62% 39% 49% 36%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
55 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
How easy or difficult was it to find information and support on
different aspects of your studies?
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 839 96 261 282 216 857 602 178 136 22 23 23
Cannot answer 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0%
Very difficult 2% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% 5% 4% 4%
Moderately difficult 13% 23% 22% 16% 12% 18% 9% 8% 7% 23% 4% 9%
Moderately easy 69% 67% 62% 68% 64% 65% 71% 67% 79% 55% 78% 74%
Very easy 14% 7% 10% 10% 19% 12% 15% 23% 11% 18% 13% 13%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FINDING SUPPORT
56TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
During your studies, did you receive enough support for career
planning and information on the job market in your own field?
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n= Aalto
CHEM, n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto ENG,
n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto ALL,
n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 842 97 261 284 214 858 602 178 135 23 24 24
Unable to answer 14% 16% 19% 9% 9% 13% 16% 10% 14% 17% 8% 8%
I didn't need such information 24% 10% 25% 25% 24% 23% 21% 34% 20% 30% 33% 29%
No, I didn't 22% 27% 22% 20% 15% 20% 25% 24% 22% 17% 29% 17%
Yes, I did 41% 47% 34% 46% 52% 44% 38% 33% 44% 35% 29% 46%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
INFORMATION ON JOB MARKET AND
CAREER PLANNIG
5. MASTER’S THESIS
Frame of collaboration
Financing
Duration
Support and supervision
60TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
My M.Sc. thesis was carried out for… ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n= Aalto
CHEM, n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto ALL,
n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 837 96 261 285 213 857 600 175 136 23 24 24
some other organization, please specify: 5% 2% 5% 6% 5% 5% 6% 3% 1% 9% 4% 8%
some other project within my university 6% 4% 7% 6% 4% 5% 6% 10% 3% 13% 13% 0%
a project in my own department 21% 17% 21% 16% 22% 19% 22% 22% 23% 44% 17% 33%
an organisation or association in third sector 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 4% 0% 0%
a research institute 7% 13% 11% 6% 10% 9% 5% 6% 7% 4% 0% 0%
an organization in public sector 6% 4% 3% 10% 5% 6% 6% 7% 10% 4% 4% 0%
a firm in private sector 54% 58% 52% 57% 52% 54% 54% 51% 57% 22% 63% 58%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FRAME OF COLLABORATION
61 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
Financing of your M.Sc. thesis ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 841 98 261 285 215 861 602 176 135 23 22 24
I received no financing 19% 6% 19% 14% 15% 15% 22% 27% 10% 70% 32% 17%
Some other way 9% 8% 11% 8% 9% 9% 10% 10% 7% 9% 14% 0%
Scholarship 13% 16% 12% 19% 6% 13% 12% 15% 13% 4% 32% 21%
Salaried work 59% 69% 59% 59% 70% 63% 57% 48% 70% 17% 23% 63%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FINANCING
62TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
DURATION
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
Months
ALL, n= 1 847
45 % 29 %
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
TUT, n= 604
41 % 33 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
Aalto CHEM, n= 98
45 % 28 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
Months
Aalto ELEC, n= 262
45 % 31 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
Months
Aalto ENG, n= 285
43 % 27 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
Months
Aalto SCI, n= 217
49 % 33 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
Months
Aalto ALL, n= 864
45 % 30 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
LUT, n= 176
63 % 15 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
27 %51 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
UT, n= 23
26 %43 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
UV, n= 24
50 % 25 %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 +
ÅAU, n= 23
30 % 26 %
UO, n= 135
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Months
Months Months Months Months MonthsMonths
63 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION
1. The supervising professor's guidance was well organised and
informative.
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n= Aalto
CHEM, n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto ENG,
n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto ALL,
n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 839 98 263 284 214 861 601 174 134 23 24 24
Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 3% 5% 2% 4% 5% 4% 3% 1% 2% 0% 0% 4%
Fully agree 62% 54% 63% 60% 62% 61% 63% 66% 64% 65% 71% 67%
Partly agree 23% 30% 19% 26% 21% 23% 25% 22% 22% 13% 29% 13%
Neither argee nor disagree 4% 4% 6% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 0% 4%
Partly disagree 6% 6% 8% 5% 5% 6% 5% 5% 7% 9% 0% 8%
Fully disagree 2% 1% 1% 2% 4% 2% 1% 3% 1% 9% 0% 4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
64TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
2. Guidance was sufficiently available. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n= Aalto
CHEM, n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto ENG,
n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto ALL,
n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 836 97 262 285 214 860 598 175 134 23 24 24
Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Fully agree 50% 47% 47% 50% 52% 49% 50% 55% 52% 52% 63% 38%
Partly agree 27% 28% 28% 26% 25% 27% 27% 29% 29% 22% 25% 46%
Neither argee nor disagree 7% 11% 8% 7% 6% 8% 7% 4% 8% 17% 4% 4%
Partly disagree 11% 10% 12% 12% 11% 12% 12% 9% 8% 4% 8% 13%
Fully disagree 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 0% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION
65 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
3. Cooperation between the university and my client carried out
well in guiding the thesis work.
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n= Aalto
CHEM, n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto ENG,
n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto ALL,
n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 829 98 261 281 213 855 598 172 135 23 24 24
Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 25% 13% 30% 21% 25% 24% 28% 25% 16% 48% 33% 13%
Fully agree 38% 48% 39% 36% 39% 39% 36% 41% 44% 22% 33% 38%
Partly agree 20% 20% 20% 22% 19% 20% 19% 21% 24% 13% 25% 29%
Neither argee nor disagree 8% 10% 6% 12% 7% 9% 8% 6% 8% 4% 8% 17%
Partly disagree 5% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 7% 4% 7% 4% 0% 0%
Fully disagree 3% 4% 1% 3% 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 9% 0% 4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION
66TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
4. I received sufficiently guidance from my client for the thesis work. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n=
ÅAU,
n=
1 830 97 262 282 214 857 596 173 135 23 24 24
Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 18% 11% 18% 15% 21% 17% 17% 20% 15% 39% 29% 17%
Fully agree 41% 54% 43% 42% 40% 43% 37% 42% 46% 30% 50% 46%
Partly agree 21% 19% 16% 21% 23% 20% 23% 23% 20% 13% 13% 17%
Neither argee nor disagree 7% 6% 8% 9% 6% 8% 8% 5% 6% 13% 0% 4%
Partly disagree 9% 6% 10% 11% 6% 9% 12% 8% 9% 4% 4% 0%
Fully disagree 4% 4% 5% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 4% 0% 4% 17%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION
67 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION
ALL n=1839 ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. The supervising
professor's guidance was
well organised and
informative.
2. Guidance was
sufficiently available.
3. Cooperation between
the university and my
client carried out well in
guiding the thesis work.
4. I received sufficiently
guidance from my client
for the thesis work.
Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 3% 1% 25% 18%
Fully disagree 2% 3% 3% 4%
Partly disagree 6% 11% 5% 9%
Neither argee nor disagree 4% 7% 8% 7%
Partly agree 23% 27% 20% 21%
Fully agree 62% 50% 38% 41%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
6. WORKING ALONG STUDIES
Amount of working during the studies
	 – Total
	 – Within own line of studies
	 – Abroad
Working and progress of studies
70TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
WORK EXPERIENCE GAINED DURING
THE STUDIES
Work experience gained during the studies,
total (excl. M.Sc. thesis), months
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 821 96 253 282 216 849 598 173 134 22 24 23
More than 2 years 39% 24% 51% 43% 45% 44% 37% 34% 30% 27% 50% 26%
1-2 yars 35% 49% 29% 34% 28% 33% 37% 34% 48% 50% 25% 39%
Less than 1 year 18% 22% 16% 18% 19% 18% 19% 19% 15% 23% 13% 17%
Not alt all 7% 5% 4% 5% 9% 6% 8% 13% 8% 0% 13% 17%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
71 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
WORK EXPERIENCE GAINED DURING
THE STUDIES
Work experience of own field gained during the studies
(excl. M.Sc. thesis), months
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 797 95 253 278 212 840 589 167 134 22 23 24
More than 2 years 26% 8% 36% 28% 36% 30% 24% 22% 15% 18% 39% 13%
1-2 yars 30% 42% 23% 34% 28% 30% 29% 25% 41% 32% 26% 17%
Less than 1 year 28% 34% 25% 28% 24% 27% 31% 28% 28% 41% 13% 42%
Not alt all 16% 17% 16% 11% 12% 14% 16% 25% 16% 9% 22% 29%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
72TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
Did working during studies affect the progress of your studies? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT,
n=
LUT,
n=
UO, n= UT, n= UV, n=
ÅAU,
n=
1 797 94 254 276 213 839 589 172 133 22 24 20
Yes, it accelerated my studies 3% 2% 3% 3% 5% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 4% 0%
Yes, it slowed down my studies 50% 29% 58% 49% 58% 52% 51% 48% 40% 41% 50% 35%
No 47% 69% 39% 48% 37% 45% 47% 49% 55% 55% 46% 65%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
WORKING AND PROGRESS OF STUDIES
7. EMPLOYMENT
Situation at the time of graduation
Type of work contract
Type of work
Operating sector
Principal duties
Organizational position
Basic salary
Previous relation with the employer
Method of recruitment
Location of the job
Working abroad
Quality of employment
76TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SITUATION AT THE TIME OF GRADUATION
Describe your situation at the time of graduation. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL,
n=
Aalto
CHEM
, n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI,
n=
Aalto
ALL,
n=
TUT,
n=
LUT,
n=
UO, n= UT, n= UV, n=
ÅAU,
n=
1 872 97 264 289 223 875 609 180 138 22 25 25
Other 5 % 6 % 6 % 6 % 2 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 8 % 5 % 8 % 4 %
I'm working as an entrepreneur. 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 4 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 4 % 0 %
I am seeking for a job. 25 % 37 % 25 % 21 % 19 % 23 % 25 % 27 % 26 % 50 % 40 % 40 %
I know, where I'm going to be employed. 10 % 11 % 8 % 13 % 14 % 11 % 11 % 6 % 10 % 0 % 0 % 4 %
I have a work contract. 58 % 45 % 60 % 60 % 61 % 59 % 59 % 61 % 56 % 46 % 48 % 52 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
77 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SITUATION AT THE TIME OF GRADUATION
I work as a full-time doctoral candidate. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 194 53 169 187 154 564 399 112 87 10 12 11
No 94% 91% 92% 98% 88% 93% 96% 93% 93% 100% 100% 100%
Yes 6% 9% 8% 2% 12% 7% 4% 7% 7% 0% 0% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
78TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
TYPE OF WORK CONTRACT IF EMPLOYED
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT,
n=
LUT,
n=
UO, n= UT, n= UV, n=
ÅAU,
n=
1 245 55 178 200 162 595 413 115 88 10 12 12
Other 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 8% 8%
Fixed-term / temporary contract 34% 49% 32% 24% 27% 29% 36% 37% 48% 20% 50% 33%
Permanent contract 65% 51% 67% 76% 70% 69% 63% 63% 50% 80% 42% 58%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
79 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 245 54 178 200 163 596 412 116 88 10 12 12
Part-time 5% 7% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 10% 17% 0%
Full-time 95% 93% 95% 96% 95% 95% 95% 98% 98% 90% 83% 100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
TYPE OF WORK IF EMPLOYED
80TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n=
ÅAU,
n=
1 246 55 177 200 162 595 414 116 88 10 12 12
Other 1% 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Association / Third sector 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Central government 1% 2% 1% 3% 0% 2% 1% 3% 1% 10% 0% 0%
Local government 3% 0% 2% 6% 0% 2% 2% 5% 2% 10% 8% 0%
Research institute 2% 6% 3% 3% 4% 4% 1% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0%
University 12% 22% 12% 7% 13% 11% 14% 11% 15% 0% 0% 17%
Private sector 80% 71% 81% 82% 80% 80% 81% 78% 78% 80% 92% 83%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
OPERATING SECTOR IF EMPLOYED
81 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
PRINCIPAL DUTIES IF EMPLOYED
ALL, n= A a l t o
C H E M ,
n=
A a l t o
E L E C ,
n=
A a l t o
ENG, n=
A a l t o
SCI, n=
A a l t o
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1  232 54 174 196 160 585 412 115 87 10 12 12
Research and development 21 % 41 % 25 % 13 % 26 % 23 % 20 % 17 % 23 % 0 % 8 % 33 %
Various project duties 19 % 13 % 14 % 29 % 10 % 18 % 20 % 21 % 23 % 30 % 17 % 8 %
Product development 18 % 4 % 33 % 13 % 21 % 21 % 17 % 16 % 18 % 20 % 17 % 8 %
Consulting 13 % 4 % 10 % 20 % 24 % 16 % 11 % 5 % 13 % 20 % 0 % 8 %
Production, manufacturing and maintenance 10 % 20 % 5 % 8 % 5 % 7 % 12 % 11 % 12 % 20 % 0 % 8 %
Other 7 % 4 % 4 % 6 % 5 % 5 % 9 % 8 % 3 % 0 % 17 % 17 %
Strategic planning and leadership 3 % 2 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 4 % 2 % 5 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 8 %
Sales and marketing 3 % 2 % 2 % 2 % 3 % 2 % 3 % 6 % 1 % 0 % 25 % 8 %
Logistics and procurement 2 % 6 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 5 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
Quality management 2 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 17 % 0 %
Administration and finance 1 % 0 % 1 % 3 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 3 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
Teaching and training 1 % 4 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 1 % 10 % 0 % 0 %
82TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
ORGANIZATIONAL POSITION IF EMPLOYED
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 238 54 175 199 161 590 414 114 87 10 12 12
Other 13% 23% 13% 7% 10% 11% 14% 9% 14% 20% 8% 50%
Entrepreneur 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Expert 76% 74% 81% 85% 79% 81% 74% 72% 67% 80% 75% 33%
Middle management 8% 4% 3% 7% 8% 6% 10% 13% 17% 0% 17% 0%
Management 2% 0% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 5% 1% 0% 0% 17%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
83 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
BASIC SALARY IF EMPLOYED
Basic salary, EUR /month ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
879 (all) 40 121 141 122 425 283 74 71 <10 <10 <10
727
(private) 30 102 115 98 346 240 62 56 <10 <10 <10
Median, all sectors 3080 3000 3200 3200 3342 3200 3000 3000 3000 3000 2825 3050
Median, private sector 3200 3175 3300 3300 3500 3300 3073 3000 3000 3000 2825 3100
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
84TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
PREVIOUS RELATION WITH THE EMPLOYER
IF EMPLOYED
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL,
n=
Aalto
CHEM
, n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI,
n=
Aalto
ALL,
n=
TUT,
n=
LUT,
n=
UO,
n=
UT, n= UV, n=
ÅAU,
n=
1 229 54 175 197 161 588 410 112 87 10 11 12
Something else 5% 6% 7% 6% 3% 5% 4% 7% 5% 10% 0% 0%
No previous relation 19% 19% 17% 19% 29% 21% 15% 25% 16% 40% 9% 33%
Yes, based work experience (excl. Master's
thesis work) 29% 17% 31% 35% 29% 30% 28% 27% 23% 40% 27% 17%
Yes, based on Master's thesis 47% 59% 45% 41% 40% 43% 52% 41% 56% 10% 64% 50%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Do you have a previous relation with your employer?
85 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
How did you get your current job? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL,
n=
Aalto
CHE
M, n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI,
n=
Aalto
ALL,
n=
TUT,
n=
LUT,
n=
UO,
n=
UT, n=
UV,
n=
ÅAU,
n=
1234 54 175 198 160 588 412 113 87 10 12 12
Something else 2% 4% 2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 10% 0% 0%
Recruiting services, events & programs, other 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Recruiting services, events & programs,
university 5% 0% 7% 3% 8% 5% 6% 3% 6% 0% 8% 17%
Personal contacts & networks 38% 50% 42% 41% 32% 40% 34% 43% 38% 20% 75% 58%
"Headhunting" 5% 2% 2% 4% 11% 5% 5% 9% 6% 0% 0% 8%
Open application & contacting 18% 13% 17% 22% 14% 18% 22% 12% 16% 30% 0% 8%
Reply to public announcement 30% 32% 29% 28% 33% 30% 31% 31% 32% 40% 17% 8%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
METHOD OF RECRUITMENT IF EMPLOYED
86TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
LOCATION OF THE JOB IF EMPLOYED
87 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
LOCATION OF THE JOB IF ABROAD
Arttu	
  Piri017
f	
  abroad
88TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
QUALITY OF EMPLOYMENT IF EMPLOYED
How well does the content of your job correspond with
your field of studies?
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n= Aalto
CHEM, n=
Aalto ELEC,
n=
Aalto ENG,
n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto ALL,
n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1238 54 175 199 161 590 414 114 87 10 12 12
Unable to answer 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
Very well 46 % 48 % 42 % 47 % 54 % 48 % 48 % 38 % 43 % 30 % 42 % 50 %
Well 32 % 28 % 31 % 32 % 35 % 32 % 32 % 32 % 38 % 20 % 25 % 25 %
Moderately 16 % 15 % 13 % 18 % 11 % 14 % 16 % 24 % 13 % 30 % 25 % 8 %
Poorly 3 % 4 % 7 % 2 % 0 % 3 % 3 % 6 % 6 % 0 % 0 % 8 %
Very poorly 1 % 0 % 4 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8 %
Not at all 1 % 6 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 20 % 8 % 0 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
89 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
QUALITY OF EMPLOYMENT IF EMPLOYED
How well does the level of demand in your job correspond with
your educational level?
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n= Aalto
ARTS, n=
Aalto
CHEM, n=
Aalto
ELEC, n=
Aalto ENG,
n=
Aalto SCI,
n=
Aalto ALL,
n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 234 1 54 175 196 161 587 413 115 87 10 11 12
Unable to answer 1% 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Very well 39% 100% 46% 37% 39% 51% 43% 38% 31% 35% 50% 18% 33%
Well 38% 0% 26% 39% 38% 38% 37% 38% 37% 39% 10% 46% 50%
Moderately 17% 0% 17% 18% 16% 9% 15% 17% 22% 20% 30% 27% 17%
Poorly 3% 0% 6% 3% 4% 1% 3% 3% 6% 5% 0% 0% 0%
Very poorly 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0%
Not at all 1% 0% 4% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 10% 9% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
8. SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
Reselection of education
Satisfaction with the studies
92TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
RESELECTION OF EDUCATION
If you could choose again, which basic degree or other education
would you choose now?
©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL,
n=
Aalto
CHEM
, n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI,
n=
Aalto
ALL,
n=
TUT,
n=
LUT,
n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU,
n=
1 781 96 251 271 213 833 589 163 133 22 23 20
Other education 4% 4% 4% 5% 1% 4% 4% 2% 7% 5% 0% 5%
University education, not Tech 9% 10% 10% 8% 8% 9% 10% 11% 10% 5% 13% 5%
Other degree programme/major in Tech 17% 27% 21% 20% 11% 19% 16% 12% 19% 23% 4% 15%
Current degree programme/major 70% 58% 65% 67% 81% 69% 70% 75% 65% 68% 83% 75%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
93 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
1. The skills I acquired in my education meet my expectations. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 796 95 251 273 210 831 598 169 133 21 24 22
Unable to answer 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 5% 0% 0%
I agree 48% 45% 46% 49% 64% 51% 47% 52% 35% 43% 38% 46%
I somewhat agree 39% 39% 36% 34% 29% 34% 41% 41% 54% 43% 50% 41%
I somewhat disagree 9% 11% 12% 15% 4% 11% 8% 6% 9% 10% 13% 14%
I disagree 2% 4% 4% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
94TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
2. My education meets my expectations ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 789 95 251 270 210 828 594 169 133 21 24 22
Unable to answer 4 % 4 % 5 % 6 % 2 % 4 % 3 % 1 % 4 % 5 % 4 % 0 %
I agree 49 % 42 % 46 % 46 % 61 % 49 % 49 % 57 % 45 % 48 % 42 % 41 %
I somewhat agree 38 % 41 % 35 % 36 % 32 % 35 % 41 % 36 % 42 % 29 % 42 % 50 %
I somewhat disagree 7 % 11 % 11 % 10 % 2 % 9 % 6 % 5 % 8 % 19 % 13 % 9 %
I disagree 2 % 2 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
95 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
3. The teaching was to a large extent of good quality ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 791 94 249 272 210 827 595 171 133 21 24 22
Unable to answer 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
I agree 47 % 43 % 37 % 42 % 52 % 43 % 49 % 62 % 38 % 57 % 33 % 50 %
I somewhat agree 40 % 37 % 41 % 43 % 33 % 39 % 40 % 29 % 52 % 43 % 58 % 46 %
I somewhat disagree 11 % 18 % 17 % 10 % 11 % 13 % 8 % 9 % 10 % 0 % 8 % 5 %
I disagree 3 % 2 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 4 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
96TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
4. I am satisfied with the used teaching methods ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 796 95 249 273 210 829 598 171 133 21 24 22
Unable to answer 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 5 %
I agree 32 % 32 % 29 % 26 % 38 % 31 % 33 % 46 % 20 % 43 % 33 % 32 %
I somewhat agree 49 % 44 % 44 % 50 % 47 % 47 % 49 % 46 % 60 % 38 % 50 % 59 %
I somewhat disagree 15 % 21 % 19 % 19 % 12 % 18 % 14 % 6 % 20 % 19 % 17 % 5 %
I disagree 3 % 3 % 8 % 4 % 3 % 5 % 3 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
97 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
5. Contents of the studies were up-to-date ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 793 95 249 272 208 826 598 171 133 21 24 22
Unable to answer 2 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 5 % 0 % 5 %
I agree 43 % 48 % 37 % 39 % 51 % 43 % 43 % 48 % 40 % 43 % 54 % 27 %
I somewhat agree 41 % 41 % 43 % 42 % 36 % 41 % 39 % 42 % 46 % 43 % 29 % 64 %
I somewhat disagree 13 % 6 % 14 % 15 % 12 % 13 % 15 % 9 % 12 % 10 % 17 % 5 %
I disagree 2 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 1 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
98TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
6. Research results from the field were applied to teaching ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG, n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n=
1 787 94 250 272 207 825 594 170 133 21 24 22
Unable to answer 4 % 3 % 5 % 3 % 3 % 4 % 3 % 2 % 4 % 5 % 4 % 9 %
I agree 52 % 65 % 51 % 49 % 57 % 54 % 49 % 55 % 48 % 62 % 58 % 41 %
I somewhat agree 37 % 20 % 36 % 40 % 30 % 34 % 40 % 37 % 38 % 29 % 29 % 41 %
I somewhat disagree 7 % 12 % 6 % 6 % 8 % 7 % 7 % 6 % 9 % 5 % 8 % 9 %
I disagree 1 % 0 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 2 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
99 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
7. I am satisfied with the education that I have received ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
ALL, n=
Aalto
ARTS,
n=
Aalto
CHEM,
n=
Aalto
ELEC,
n=
Aalto
ENG,
n=
Aalto
SCI, n=
Aalto
ALL, n=
TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n=
ÅAU,
n=
1 781 2 93 250 272 207 824 593 167 132 21 24 22
Unable to answer 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
I agree 59% 50% 57% 52% 55% 71% 58% 60% 67% 49% 57% 50% 59%
I somewhat agree 33% 50% 34% 34% 35% 25% 32% 33% 28% 44% 38% 38% 32%
I somewhat disagree 6% 0% 7% 11% 7% 1% 7% 4% 5% 8% 5% 13% 9%
I disagree 1% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
100TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK
SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
ALL n=1796 ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016
1. The skills I
acquired in my
education meet
my
expectations.
2. My
education
meets my
expectations.
3. The
teaching was
to a large
extent of good
quality.
4. I am
satisfied with
the used
teaching
methods.
5. Contents of
the studies
were upto-
date.
6. Research
results from
the field were
applied to
teaching.
7. I am
satisfied with
the education
that I have
received.
Unable to answer 2% 4% 1% 1% 2% 4% 1%
I agree 48% 49% 47% 32% 43% 52% 59%
I somewhat agree 39% 38% 40% 49% 41% 37% 33%
I somewhat disagree 9% 7% 11% 15% 13% 7% 6%
I disagree 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2016
Academic Engineers and Architects in Finland TEK and Finnish universities
in technology together carry out a yearly feedback survey for graduated
academic engineers and architects.
The feedback and results are utilized in developing university education and
influencing the educational policy making.
More information:
Jari Jokinen, jari.jokinen@tek.fi
Arttu Piri, arttu.piri@tek.fi
www.tek.fi/vastavalmistuneet

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a TEK Graduate Survey 2016 - Results

Tek graduate survey_2017_results
Tek graduate survey_2017_resultsTek graduate survey_2017_results
Tek graduate survey_2017_resultsArttu Piri
 
ISETL presentation: Cafeteria Style Grading 10/13/16
ISETL presentation: Cafeteria Style Grading 10/13/16ISETL presentation: Cafeteria Style Grading 10/13/16
ISETL presentation: Cafeteria Style Grading 10/13/16Anne Arendt
 
Direct admissions 2012 2018 eng
Direct admissions 2012 2018 engDirect admissions 2012 2018 eng
Direct admissions 2012 2018 engArman_Assetov
 
001 direct admissions 2016 eng
001 direct admissions 2016 eng001 direct admissions 2016 eng
001 direct admissions 2016 engIndira Tolendiyeva
 
3rd quarter SMEA.pptx
3rd quarter SMEA.pptx3rd quarter SMEA.pptx
3rd quarter SMEA.pptxEmmieGGarbosa
 
Talis Insight Asia-Pacific 2017: Simon Bedford, University of Wollongong
Talis Insight Asia-Pacific 2017: Simon Bedford, University of WollongongTalis Insight Asia-Pacific 2017: Simon Bedford, University of Wollongong
Talis Insight Asia-Pacific 2017: Simon Bedford, University of WollongongTalis
 
Tve of taiwan
Tve of taiwan Tve of taiwan
Tve of taiwan gatothp
 
Lake Bluff PARCC Report, with Benchmarks
Lake Bluff PARCC Report, with BenchmarksLake Bluff PARCC Report, with Benchmarks
Lake Bluff PARCC Report, with Benchmarksjustthefactswinnetka
 
Powering Up Writing Grant Report
Powering Up Writing Grant ReportPowering Up Writing Grant Report
Powering Up Writing Grant ReportDan Maas
 
Data Collection and Analysis Overview - Martin Furner
Data Collection and Analysis Overview - Martin FurnerData Collection and Analysis Overview - Martin Furner
Data Collection and Analysis Overview - Martin FurnerIMI PQ NET Romania
 
Results of an apprenticeship survey - evaluation of apprenticeship views
Results of an apprenticeship survey - evaluation of apprenticeship viewsResults of an apprenticeship survey - evaluation of apprenticeship views
Results of an apprenticeship survey - evaluation of apprenticeship viewsThe Pathway Group
 
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant ConferenceDesign and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant ConferenceOfsted
 

Semelhante a TEK Graduate Survey 2016 - Results (20)

Tek graduate survey_2017_results
Tek graduate survey_2017_resultsTek graduate survey_2017_results
Tek graduate survey_2017_results
 
Sp170324
Sp170324Sp170324
Sp170324
 
Wil palmer young_ss
Wil palmer young_ssWil palmer young_ss
Wil palmer young_ss
 
ISETL presentation: Cafeteria Style Grading 10/13/16
ISETL presentation: Cafeteria Style Grading 10/13/16ISETL presentation: Cafeteria Style Grading 10/13/16
ISETL presentation: Cafeteria Style Grading 10/13/16
 
Direct admissions 2012 2018 eng
Direct admissions 2012 2018 engDirect admissions 2012 2018 eng
Direct admissions 2012 2018 eng
 
Direct admissions 2016 eng
Direct admissions 2016 engDirect admissions 2016 eng
Direct admissions 2016 eng
 
Tracking student engagement in Moodle Emily Webb
Tracking student engagement in Moodle  	Emily WebbTracking student engagement in Moodle  	Emily Webb
Tracking student engagement in Moodle Emily Webb
 
001 direct admissions 2016 eng
001 direct admissions 2016 eng001 direct admissions 2016 eng
001 direct admissions 2016 eng
 
3rd quarter SMEA.pptx
3rd quarter SMEA.pptx3rd quarter SMEA.pptx
3rd quarter SMEA.pptx
 
Talis Insight Asia-Pacific 2017: Simon Bedford, University of Wollongong
Talis Insight Asia-Pacific 2017: Simon Bedford, University of WollongongTalis Insight Asia-Pacific 2017: Simon Bedford, University of Wollongong
Talis Insight Asia-Pacific 2017: Simon Bedford, University of Wollongong
 
Direct admissions 2017 eng
Direct admissions 2017 engDirect admissions 2017 eng
Direct admissions 2017 eng
 
Vietnamese skill improvement
Vietnamese skill improvementVietnamese skill improvement
Vietnamese skill improvement
 
Tve of taiwan
Tve of taiwan Tve of taiwan
Tve of taiwan
 
Lake Bluff PARCC Report, with Benchmarks
Lake Bluff PARCC Report, with BenchmarksLake Bluff PARCC Report, with Benchmarks
Lake Bluff PARCC Report, with Benchmarks
 
Sp190610ss
Sp190610ssSp190610ss
Sp190610ss
 
Powering Up Writing Grant Report
Powering Up Writing Grant ReportPowering Up Writing Grant Report
Powering Up Writing Grant Report
 
Data Collection and Analysis Overview - Martin Furner
Data Collection and Analysis Overview - Martin FurnerData Collection and Analysis Overview - Martin Furner
Data Collection and Analysis Overview - Martin Furner
 
Sp170405
Sp170405Sp170405
Sp170405
 
Results of an apprenticeship survey - evaluation of apprenticeship views
Results of an apprenticeship survey - evaluation of apprenticeship viewsResults of an apprenticeship survey - evaluation of apprenticeship views
Results of an apprenticeship survey - evaluation of apprenticeship views
 
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant ConferenceDesign and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
 

Mais de Arttu Piri

TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2018 Työssäkäynti
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2018 TyössäkäyntiTEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2018 Työssäkäynti
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2018 TyössäkäyntiArttu Piri
 
TEK Teekkarikulttuuri 2018
TEK Teekkarikulttuuri 2018TEK Teekkarikulttuuri 2018
TEK Teekkarikulttuuri 2018Arttu Piri
 
Tek tyollisyyskatsaus q1 2018
Tek tyollisyyskatsaus q1 2018Tek tyollisyyskatsaus q1 2018
Tek tyollisyyskatsaus q1 2018Arttu Piri
 
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2017
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2017TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2017
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2017Arttu Piri
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2017
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2017TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2017
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2017Arttu Piri
 
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2017
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2017TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2017
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2017Arttu Piri
 
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2017
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2017Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2017
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2017Arttu Piri
 
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2017
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2017TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2017
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2017Arttu Piri
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2016
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2016TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2016
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2016Arttu Piri
 
Opiskelijatutkimus 2016 tuloksia
Opiskelijatutkimus 2016 tuloksiaOpiskelijatutkimus 2016 tuloksia
Opiskelijatutkimus 2016 tuloksiaArttu Piri
 
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q3 2016
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q3 2016TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q3 2016
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q3 2016Arttu Piri
 
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2016
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2016Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2016
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2016Arttu Piri
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2016
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2016TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2016
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2016Arttu Piri
 
Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015 Perustulokset
Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015 PerustuloksetVastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015 Perustulokset
Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015 PerustuloksetArttu Piri
 
TEK Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015
TEK Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015TEK Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015
TEK Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015Arttu Piri
 
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q4/2015
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q4/2015TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q4/2015
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q4/2015Arttu Piri
 
Tek työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2015
Tek työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2015Tek työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2015
Tek työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2015Arttu Piri
 
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2015 tulokset
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2015 tuloksetTEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2015 tulokset
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2015 tuloksetArttu Piri
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q2 2015
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q2 2015TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q2 2015
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q2 2015Arttu Piri
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus q2_2014_v2
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus q2_2014_v2TEK Työllisyyskatsaus q2_2014_v2
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus q2_2014_v2Arttu Piri
 

Mais de Arttu Piri (20)

TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2018 Työssäkäynti
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2018 TyössäkäyntiTEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2018 Työssäkäynti
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2018 Työssäkäynti
 
TEK Teekkarikulttuuri 2018
TEK Teekkarikulttuuri 2018TEK Teekkarikulttuuri 2018
TEK Teekkarikulttuuri 2018
 
Tek tyollisyyskatsaus q1 2018
Tek tyollisyyskatsaus q1 2018Tek tyollisyyskatsaus q1 2018
Tek tyollisyyskatsaus q1 2018
 
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2017
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2017TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2017
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2017
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2017
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2017TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2017
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2017
 
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2017
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2017TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2017
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2017
 
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2017
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2017Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2017
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2017
 
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2017
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2017TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2017
TEK työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2017
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2016
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2016TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2016
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q4 2016
 
Opiskelijatutkimus 2016 tuloksia
Opiskelijatutkimus 2016 tuloksiaOpiskelijatutkimus 2016 tuloksia
Opiskelijatutkimus 2016 tuloksia
 
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q3 2016
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q3 2016TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q3 2016
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q3 2016
 
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2016
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2016Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2016
Tek työllisyyskatsaus q2 2016
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2016
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2016TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2016
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q1 2016
 
Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015 Perustulokset
Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015 PerustuloksetVastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015 Perustulokset
Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015 Perustulokset
 
TEK Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015
TEK Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015TEK Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015
TEK Vastavalmistuneiden palautekysely 2015
 
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q4/2015
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q4/2015TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q4/2015
TEK Työttömyyskatsaus Q4/2015
 
Tek työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2015
Tek työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2015Tek työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2015
Tek työllisyyskatsaus Q3 2015
 
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2015 tulokset
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2015 tuloksetTEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2015 tulokset
TEK Opiskelijatutkimus 2015 tulokset
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q2 2015
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q2 2015TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q2 2015
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus Q2 2015
 
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus q2_2014_v2
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus q2_2014_v2TEK Työllisyyskatsaus q2_2014_v2
TEK Työllisyyskatsaus q2_2014_v2
 

Último

Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.MateoGardella
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Shubhangi Sonawane
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...KokoStevan
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...christianmathematics
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxDenish Jangid
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesCeline George
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterMateoGardella
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfChris Hunter
 

Último (20)

Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 

TEK Graduate Survey 2016 - Results

  • 1. TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2016 R E S U L T S
  • 2. TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2016 RESULTS
  • 3. 4TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2016 Academic Engineers and Architects in Finland TEK and Finnish universities of technology to­ gether conduct a yearly feedback survey for graduated academic engineers and architects. The feedback and results are utilized in deve­ loping university education and influencing the educational policy making. TEK is responsible for accomplishing the survey and the universities are responsible for reaching their new graduates. The survey is directed by a Directory Board having a representative from every participating uni­ versity. SURVEY THEMES 1. Basics 2. Studies 3. Skills and expertise: Importance and development 4. Support and guidance 5. Master’s Thesis 6. Working along studies 7. Employment 8. Satisfaction with the studies More information, results and resources: www.tek.fi/vastavalmistuneet Contact: Arttu Piri, Analyst, TEK: arttu.piri@tek.fi
  • 4. 5 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK PARTICIPATING UNIVERSITIES AND SCHOOLS UNIVERSITIES AND SCHOOLS IN RESULTS AND GRAPHS 1. Aalto University Aalto ALL School of Chemical Engineering Aalto CHEM School of Electrical Engineering Aalto ELEC School of Engineering Aalto ENG School of Science Aalto SCI School of Arts, Design and Architecture 2. Tampere University of Technology TUT 3. Lappeenranta University of Technology LUT 4. Oulu University OU 5. Turku University TU 6. Vaasa University VU 7. Åbo Akademi University ÅAU
  • 5.
  • 6. 1. BASICS Response rates and the number of graduates in 2016 Gender Nationality Ages
  • 7. 8TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK RESPONSE RATES AND THE NUMBER OF GRADUATES IN 2016 ALL Aalto CHEM Aalto ELEC Aalto ENG Aalto SCI Aalto ALL TUT LUT UO UT UV ÅAU Responses 2016 2120 112 294 342 257 1007 638 233 161 24 26 33 Graduates 2016 3115 179 384 420 323 1364 835 410 360 72 52 48 Response rate 2016 68 % 63 % 77 % 81 % 80 % 74 % 76 % 57 % 45 % 33 % 50 % 69 %
  • 8. 9 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK RESPONSE RATES AND THE NUMBER OF GRADUATES IN 2016 Distribution of new graduates in technology 2016 by university Aalto ALL, 42 % TUT, 27 % LUT, 13 % UO, 12 % UT, 2 % UV, 2 % ÅAU, 1 %
  • 9. 10TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK GENDER ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 2120 112 294 342 257 1007 638 233 161 24 26 33 Female 24% 38% 14% 23% 24% 22% 26% 21% 31% 13% 19% 18% Male 76% 62% 86% 77% 76% 78% 74% 79% 69% 88% 81% 82% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 10. 11 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK NATIONALITY ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 2120 112 294 342 257 1007 638 233 161 24 26 33 Other outside EU 14% 13% 14% 7% 16% 12% 14% 20% 8% 33% 19% 24% Other within EU 3% 4% 3% 3% 8% 5% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 3% Finnish 83% 83% 83% 90% 76% 83% 84% 78% 93% 67% 81% 73% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 11. 12TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK AGES ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 40-39383736353433323130292827262524- 23 Age Year of birth - > 1982: 9 % Year of birth 1982 - >: 91 %
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14. 2. STUDIES B.Sc. studies M.Sc. studies Studying abroad Delays in studies or graduation
  • 15. 16TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK B.SC. STUDIES Absence during the Bachelor's degree studies, semesters ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1757 98 250 290 217 857 527 166 146 21 18 24 Over 2 6% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% 7% 5% 10% 5% 11% 0% 2 12% 5% 14% 10% 16% 12% 14% 5% 8% 5% 11% 0% 1 11% 8% 9% 13% 12% 11% 13% 8% 4% 5% 11% 0% None 72% 82% 72% 72% 66% 72% 66% 81% 77% 86% 67% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 16. 17 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK Degree and the awarding institution before Master’s studies? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 975 100 279 320 240 940 602 221 141 21 25 26 Other 7% 7% 5% 6% 6% 6% 6% 13% 7% 14% 17% 8% Bachelor of Engineering (Insinööri AMK) 14% 8% 10% 14% 9% 11% 11% 32% 4% 29% 29% 35% B.Sc. (Tech), another university 12% 11% 12% 7% 18% 12% 12% 15% 7% 24% 4% 12% B.Sc. (Tech), current university 69% 75% 75% 75% 69% 73% 72% 43% 82% 33% 54% 46% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% B.SC. STUDIES
  • 17. 18TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK Absence during your M.Sc. degree studies, semesters ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1963 105 271 317 238 933 605 207 145 23 24 28 Over 2 5% 2% 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 4% 0% 4% 2 4% 1% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% 5% 2% 0% 0% 4% 1 6% 0% 5% 4% 7% 5% 8% 9% 2% 4% 0% 4% None 86% 97% 85% 88% 84% 87% 83% 81% 89% 91% 100% 89% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M.SC. STUDIES
  • 18. 19 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK Studies abroad during your B.Sc. and M.Sc. studies, months ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1976 109 274 322 238 945 600 209 152 23 21 28 Over 12 5% 3% 4% 3% 10% 5% 4% 5% 3% 4% 0% 0% 7-12 8% 5% 6% 11% 8% 8% 10% 10% 3% 17% 0% 0% 1-6 22% 28% 19% 24% 24% 23% 20% 25% 25% 13% 0% 25% 0 65% 65% 72% 62% 58% 64% 66% 61% 69% 65% 100% 75% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% STUDIES ABROAD
  • 19. 20TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK DELAYS IN STUDIES OR GRADUATION Do you feel that your studies or graduation were delayed by some reason? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 2 013 109 278 327 237 953 615 216 154 24 23 30 Yes, over 12 months 32% 19% 40% 32% 34% 33% 34% 24% 34% 42% 26% 7% Yes, 7 -12 months 13% 16% 11% 10% 11% 11% 14% 14% 16% 4% 9% 13% Yes, 1 -6 months 26% 25% 23% 26% 23% 24% 26% 31% 27% 17% 13% 37% No 29% 40% 26% 32% 32% 31% 26% 32% 23% 38% 52% 43% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 20. 21 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK DELAYS IN STUDIES OR GRADUATION Reason for the delay ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 421 65 207 221 162 657 457 148 118 15 11 17 Working during the studies. 57 % 38 % 65 % 52 % 63 % 58 % 56 % 59 % 47 % 53 % 100 % 47 % Delay in finding a place or subject for the thesis work. 29 % 31 % 29 % 33 % 17 % 28 % 33 % 28 % 32 % 7 % 27 % 18 % Insufficient motivation for studies. 21 % 20 % 26 % 19 % 15 % 20 % 20 % 18 % 28 % 13 % 27 % 29 % Other matters related to master’s thesis or graduation. 15 % 25 % 9 % 19 % 16 % 16 % 14 % 17 % 10 % 27 % 27 % 29 % Overlaps and incompatibilities in the course schedules. 13 % 22 % 18 % 14 % 8 % 15 % 12 % 14 % 11 % 7 % 9 % 0 % Personal issues, eg. health problems. 10 % 9 % 12 % 8 % 9 % 10 % 11 % 11 % 10 % 27 % 9 % 6 % Spending time as an exchange student. 10 % 5 % 4 % 10 % 7 % 7 % 14 % 13 % 7 % 7 % 0 % 12 % Insufficient master’s thesis guidance. 9 % 17 % 11 % 9 % 15 % 12 % 7 % 5 % 5 % 20 % 9 % 6 % Insufficient study guidance. 8 % 8 % 14 % 10 % 6 % 10 % 6 % 4 % 5 % 0 % 0 % 12 % Taking part in the student organization(s’) activities. 7 % 6 % 9 % 5 % 7 % 7 % 7 % 6 % 7 % 0 % 9 % 6 % Military or civil service. 7 % 3 % 8 % 9 % 8 % 8 % 7 % 3 % 8 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Insufficient studying skills. 6 % 12 % 6 % 7 % 6 % 7 % 5 % 2 % 10 % 0 % 9 % 0 % Not having a job to take up after graduating. 5 % 0 % 5 % 3 % 4 % 4 % 5 % 5 % 3 % 27 % 0 % 24 % Changing the course of the studies or taking additional courses. 4 % 2 % 4 % 5 % 7 % 5 % 4 % 2 % 3 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Family issues. 4 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 4 % 3 % 4 % 1 % 4 % 7 % 9 % 0 % Some other reason. 3 % 2 % 6 % 2 % 3 % 4 % 3 % 4 % 3 % 7 % 0 % 6 % Professional sports. 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 9 % 0 %
  • 21.
  • 22. 3. EXPERTISE AND SKILLS: IMPORTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Expertise and skills: Importance Expertise and skills: Development due to studies Expertise and skills: Development due to work experience Importance of work experience Value of activity within societies and organizations (eg. Student Union)
  • 23. 24TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality 1. Importance 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Aalto CHEM, n= 101 Aalto ELEC, n= 259 Aalto ENG, n= 291 Aalto SCI, n= 221 TUT, n= 610 LUT, n= 193 UO, n= 139 UT, n= 22 UV, n= 24 ÅAU, n= 24 EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 24. 25 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality 2. Development in studies 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 ALL, n= 1 884 1. Importance Aalto CHEM, n= 101 Aalto ELEC, n= 259 Aalto ENG, n= 291 Aalto SCI, n= 221 TUT, n= 610 LUT, n= 193 UO, n= 139 UT, n= 22 UV, n= 24 ÅAU, n= 24 EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 25. 26TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality 3. Development in work 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 ALL, n= 1 884 1. Importance Aalto CHEM, n= 101 Aalto ELEC, n= 259 Aalto ENG, n= 291 Aalto SCI, n= 221 TUT, n= 610 LUT, n= 193 UO, n= 139 UT, n= 22 UV, n= 24 ÅAU, n= 24 EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 26. 27 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK FACTORS OF EXPERTICE Internationality Social skills Business and Management Expertice and substance knowledge Working Life Skills Analytical skills Skills related to international work environment Social skills Basics of business operations Know-how of own field Problem solving Critical thinking Foreign languages Team working Entrepreneurial capacities Mathematical and natural science Time management and prioritizing Analytical thinking Oral communication Sustainable development Knowledge of the of research own field Attitude towards developing own skills Creativity Leadership Information retrieval Self-confidence Project management Self-knowledge Practical application of theories Ethicality Not included in the factors: Written communication Career management capacities EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 27. 28TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK Factors of expertice (mean), ALL ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 Business & Management Expertise & Substance Internationality Social Skills Working Life Skills Analytical Skills IMPORTANCE 4,58 4,85 5,15 5,34 5,53 5,18 DEVELOPMENT IN STUDIES 3,79 4,98 4,38 4,39 4,71 4,53 DEVELOPMENT IN WORK 3,76 4,16 4,11 4,49 4,86 4,51 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 5,00 5,50 6,00 DEVELOPMENT IN STUDIES
  • 28. 29 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality ALL, n= 1 884 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 3. Development in work 2. Development in studies 1. Importance EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 29. 30TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality Aalto CHEM, n= 101 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 30. 31 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality Aalto ELEC, n= 259 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 31. 32TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality Aalto ENG, n= 291 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 32. 33 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality Aalto SCI, n= 221 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 33. 34TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality Aalto ALL, n= 874 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 34. 35 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality TUT, n= 610 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 35. 36TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality LUT, n= 193 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 36. 37 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality UO, n= 139 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 37. 38TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality UT, n= 22 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
  • 38. 39 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK EXPERTISE AND SKILLS ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality UV, n= 24 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work
  • 39. 40TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. Know-how of own field 2. Knowledge of the research of own field 3. Mathematical and natural science 4. Practical application of theories 5. Sustainable development 6. Basics of business operations 7. Entrepreneurial capacities 8. Problem solving 9. Information retrieval 10. Foreign languages 11. Skills related to international work environment 12. Management skills 13. Time management and prioritizing14. Attitude towards developing own skills 15. Career management capacities 16. Written communication 17. Oral communication 18. Leadership 19. Team working 20. Social skills 21. Self-knowledge 22. Self-confidence 23. Creativity 24. Critical thinking 25. Analytical thinking 26. Ethicality ÅAU, n= 24 1=Not at all (important) 2=Very little 3=Little 4=Somewhat 5=Much 6=Very much (7=Cannot answer) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Importance 2. Development in studies 3. Development in work EXPERTICE AND SKILLS
  • 40. 41 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK THE IMPORTANCE OF WORK EXPERIENCE How useful do you consider the study related practise/ work experience that you gained during your studies? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 849 98 261 284 216 861 604 182 135 22 24 23 Cannot say 4% 1% 6% 4% 3% 4% 5% 8% 2% 5% 0% 0% Not at all useful 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Only little useful 5% 7% 3% 5% 2% 4% 5% 7% 4% 18% 8% 22% Useful 26% 27% 23% 24% 21% 23% 27% 29% 29% 27% 33% 48% Very useful 65% 65% 67% 67% 74% 69% 63% 57% 64% 50% 58% 30% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 41. 42TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK Have you participated in student union – or other organizational activites (also outside the university) or worked in university administration as student representative during your studies? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 846 98 261 285 216 862 602 180 136 22 23 23 Yes 41% 40% 47% 46% 52% 47% 34% 35% 33% 46% 30% 65% No 59% 60% 53% 54% 48% 53% 66% 65% 67% 55% 70% 35% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% THE IMPORTANCE OF WORK EXPERIENCE
  • 42. 43 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK THE IMPORTANCE OF WORK EXPERIENCE How useful do you consider this to have been for your (professional) development? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 839 97 261 282 216 858 601 180 133 22 24 23 Did not participate / Cannot say 50% 47% 45% 48% 38% 44% 56% 50% 63% 41% 50% 13% Not at all useful 3% 5% 5% 2% 4% 4% 2% 1% 2% 5% 0% 4% Only little useful 11% 8% 15% 13% 10% 13% 10% 11% 7% 18% 21% 13% Useful 20% 21% 17% 21% 24% 21% 19% 21% 17% 18% 25% 48% Very useful 16% 19% 18% 16% 24% 19% 13% 17% 12% 18% 4% 22% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 43.
  • 44. 4. SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING Level of support and councelling Finding support Information on career planning and job markets
  • 45. 46TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 1. I feel comfortable at my university. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 832 97 259 283 214 855 601 175 135 22 24 22 Unable to answer 1% 0% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% I agree 72% 63% 61% 70% 70% 67% 76% 85% 70% 77% 75% 86% I somewhat agree 18% 29% 22% 19% 18% 21% 16% 11% 22% 14% 25% 5% I somewhat disagree 7% 8% 10% 7% 8% 8% 6% 3% 6% 5% 0% 9% I disagree 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 5% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
  • 46. 47 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 2. I am satisfied with my studies. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 834 97 258 283 214 854 601 177 135 22 24 23 Unable to answer 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% I agree 53% 50% 51% 55% 59% 54% 50% 62% 49% 64% 58% 52% I somewhat agree 32% 34% 25% 33% 29% 29% 35% 27% 38% 27% 38% 35% I somewhat disagree 11% 16% 16% 10% 9% 12% 12% 10% 10% 9% 0% 9% I disagree 3% 1% 7% 3% 2% 4% 3% 1% 3% 0% 4% 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
  • 47. 48TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 3. I have had enough guidance available to do my masters thesis. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 831 97 258 285 211 853 604 174 134 22 24 22 Unable to answer 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% I agree 55% 45% 54% 53% 58% 54% 53% 61% 61% 64% 67% 59% I somewhat agree 28% 27% 24% 29% 25% 26% 32% 25% 25% 27% 25% 27% I somewhat disagree 12% 22% 15% 13% 7% 13% 11% 12% 11% 5% 8% 14% I disagree 4% 4% 6% 4% 8% 6% 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
  • 48. 49 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 4. I have had enough guidance available to plan my studies. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 830 97 258 283 213 853 601 175 134 22 24 23 Unable to answer 2% 1% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 4% I agree 50% 30% 43% 38% 55% 42% 55% 63% 57% 50% 67% 39% I somewhat agree 31% 41% 30% 34% 29% 32% 31% 26% 28% 41% 21% 35% I somewhat disagree 13% 22% 18% 19% 9% 16% 10% 9% 13% 5% 4% 17% I disagree 4% 6% 7% 7% 5% 6% 2% 2% 2% 5% 8% 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
  • 49. 50TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 5. If needed, I would always know the person to whom I can ask help for.©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 831 96 259 283 213 853 601 176 134 22 24 23 Unable to answer 3% 2% 6% 3% 3% 4% 3% 1% 4% 0% 0% 4% I agree 62% 49% 53% 51% 70% 56% 65% 72% 69% 59% 71% 70% I somewhat agree 26% 34% 25% 33% 18% 27% 26% 20% 22% 41% 25% 13% I somewhat disagree 8% 13% 14% 10% 5% 10% 6% 7% 5% 0% 4% 13% I disagree 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING
  • 50. 51 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING 6. I was satisfied with the opportunies I had to influence and participate in my university. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 831 97 258 285 213 855 597 177 135 22 24 23 Unable to answer 18 % 20 % 25 % 19 % 16 % 20 % 17 % 11 % 24 % 18 % 17 % 4 % I agree 39 % 30 % 35 % 28 % 41 % 34 % 43 % 54 % 37 % 36 % 29 % 30 % I somewhat agree 32 % 30 % 24 % 37 % 33 % 31 % 31 % 33 % 30 % 32 % 38 % 52 % I somewhat disagree 9 % 16 % 12 % 14 % 7 % 12 % 8 % 2 % 7 % 14 % 8 % 13 % I disagree 2 % 5 % 4 % 2 % 4 % 3 % 2 % 0 % 2 % 0 % 8 % 0 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 51. 52TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING 7. I was satisfied with the communication I had with the teaching staff. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 834 97 259 285 213 856 600 177 135 22 23 23 Unable to answer 2 % 2 % 3 % 3 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 4 % I agree 49 % 50 % 42 % 44 % 49 % 45 % 48 % 59 % 56 % 68 % 39 % 74 % I somewhat agree 35 % 36 % 37 % 35 % 36 % 36 % 36 % 33 % 30 % 23 % 52 % 13 % I somewhat disagree 11 % 9 % 14 % 14 % 9 % 12 % 12 % 5 % 10 % 5 % 4 % 4 % I disagree 3 % 3 % 5 % 3 % 4 % 4 % 2 % 1 % 3 % 5 % 4 % 4 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 52. 53 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING 8. The feedback I received from the teaching staff has helped me with my studies. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 832 97 258 282 212 851 603 176 135 22 24 23 Unable to answer 4 % 0 % 4 % 5 % 1 % 3 % 5 % 4 % 2 % 9 % 0 % 9 % I agree 36 % 44 % 33 % 32 % 40 % 36 % 33 % 46 % 30 % 55 % 54 % 61 % I somewhat agree 37 % 35 % 36 % 33 % 34 % 35 % 41 % 34 % 45 % 27 % 42 % 17 % I somewhat disagree 17 % 14 % 18 % 23 % 18 % 19 % 17 % 15 % 18 % 5 % 4 % 9 % I disagree 5 % 6 % 9 % 6 % 7 % 7 % 4 % 1 % 4 % 5 % 0 % 4 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 53. 54TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK LEVEL OF SUPPORT AND COUNCELLING Level of support and guidance, ALL n=1832 ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. I feel comfortable at my university. 2. I am satisfied with my studies. 3. I have had enough guidance available to do my masters thesis. 4. I have had enough guidance available to plan my studies. 5. If needed, I would always know the person to whom I can ask help for. 6. I was satisfied with the opportunies I had to influence and participate in my university. 7. I was satisfied with the communicati on I had with the teaching staff. 8. The feedback I received from the teaching staff has helped me with my studies. Unable to answer 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 18% 2% 4% I disagree 2% 3% 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 5% I somewhat disagree 7% 11% 12% 13% 8% 9% 11% 17% I somewhat agree 18% 32% 28% 31% 26% 32% 35% 37% I agree 72% 53% 55% 50% 62% 39% 49% 36% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 54. 55 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK How easy or difficult was it to find information and support on different aspects of your studies? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 839 96 261 282 216 857 602 178 136 22 23 23 Cannot answer 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% Very difficult 2% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% 5% 4% 4% Moderately difficult 13% 23% 22% 16% 12% 18% 9% 8% 7% 23% 4% 9% Moderately easy 69% 67% 62% 68% 64% 65% 71% 67% 79% 55% 78% 74% Very easy 14% 7% 10% 10% 19% 12% 15% 23% 11% 18% 13% 13% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% FINDING SUPPORT
  • 55. 56TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK During your studies, did you receive enough support for career planning and information on the job market in your own field? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 842 97 261 284 214 858 602 178 135 23 24 24 Unable to answer 14% 16% 19% 9% 9% 13% 16% 10% 14% 17% 8% 8% I didn't need such information 24% 10% 25% 25% 24% 23% 21% 34% 20% 30% 33% 29% No, I didn't 22% 27% 22% 20% 15% 20% 25% 24% 22% 17% 29% 17% Yes, I did 41% 47% 34% 46% 52% 44% 38% 33% 44% 35% 29% 46% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% INFORMATION ON JOB MARKET AND CAREER PLANNIG
  • 56.
  • 57.
  • 58. 5. MASTER’S THESIS Frame of collaboration Financing Duration Support and supervision
  • 59. 60TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK My M.Sc. thesis was carried out for… ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 837 96 261 285 213 857 600 175 136 23 24 24 some other organization, please specify: 5% 2% 5% 6% 5% 5% 6% 3% 1% 9% 4% 8% some other project within my university 6% 4% 7% 6% 4% 5% 6% 10% 3% 13% 13% 0% a project in my own department 21% 17% 21% 16% 22% 19% 22% 22% 23% 44% 17% 33% an organisation or association in third sector 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 4% 0% 0% a research institute 7% 13% 11% 6% 10% 9% 5% 6% 7% 4% 0% 0% an organization in public sector 6% 4% 3% 10% 5% 6% 6% 7% 10% 4% 4% 0% a firm in private sector 54% 58% 52% 57% 52% 54% 54% 51% 57% 22% 63% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% FRAME OF COLLABORATION
  • 60. 61 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK Financing of your M.Sc. thesis ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 841 98 261 285 215 861 602 176 135 23 22 24 I received no financing 19% 6% 19% 14% 15% 15% 22% 27% 10% 70% 32% 17% Some other way 9% 8% 11% 8% 9% 9% 10% 10% 7% 9% 14% 0% Scholarship 13% 16% 12% 19% 6% 13% 12% 15% 13% 4% 32% 21% Salaried work 59% 69% 59% 59% 70% 63% 57% 48% 70% 17% 23% 63% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% FINANCING
  • 61. 62TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK DURATION 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + Months ALL, n= 1 847 45 % 29 % 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + TUT, n= 604 41 % 33 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + Aalto CHEM, n= 98 45 % 28 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + Months Aalto ELEC, n= 262 45 % 31 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + Months Aalto ENG, n= 285 43 % 27 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + Months Aalto SCI, n= 217 49 % 33 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + Months Aalto ALL, n= 864 45 % 30 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + LUT, n= 176 63 % 15 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + 27 %51 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + UT, n= 23 26 %43 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + UV, n= 24 50 % 25 % 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 + ÅAU, n= 23 30 % 26 % UO, n= 135 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Months Months Months Months Months MonthsMonths
  • 62. 63 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION 1. The supervising professor's guidance was well organised and informative. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 839 98 263 284 214 861 601 174 134 23 24 24 Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 3% 5% 2% 4% 5% 4% 3% 1% 2% 0% 0% 4% Fully agree 62% 54% 63% 60% 62% 61% 63% 66% 64% 65% 71% 67% Partly agree 23% 30% 19% 26% 21% 23% 25% 22% 22% 13% 29% 13% Neither argee nor disagree 4% 4% 6% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 0% 4% Partly disagree 6% 6% 8% 5% 5% 6% 5% 5% 7% 9% 0% 8% Fully disagree 2% 1% 1% 2% 4% 2% 1% 3% 1% 9% 0% 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 63. 64TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 2. Guidance was sufficiently available. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 836 97 262 285 214 860 598 175 134 23 24 24 Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Fully agree 50% 47% 47% 50% 52% 49% 50% 55% 52% 52% 63% 38% Partly agree 27% 28% 28% 26% 25% 27% 27% 29% 29% 22% 25% 46% Neither argee nor disagree 7% 11% 8% 7% 6% 8% 7% 4% 8% 17% 4% 4% Partly disagree 11% 10% 12% 12% 11% 12% 12% 9% 8% 4% 8% 13% Fully disagree 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION
  • 64. 65 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 3. Cooperation between the university and my client carried out well in guiding the thesis work. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 829 98 261 281 213 855 598 172 135 23 24 24 Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 25% 13% 30% 21% 25% 24% 28% 25% 16% 48% 33% 13% Fully agree 38% 48% 39% 36% 39% 39% 36% 41% 44% 22% 33% 38% Partly agree 20% 20% 20% 22% 19% 20% 19% 21% 24% 13% 25% 29% Neither argee nor disagree 8% 10% 6% 12% 7% 9% 8% 6% 8% 4% 8% 17% Partly disagree 5% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 7% 4% 7% 4% 0% 0% Fully disagree 3% 4% 1% 3% 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 9% 0% 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION
  • 65. 66TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 4. I received sufficiently guidance from my client for the thesis work. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 830 97 262 282 214 857 596 173 135 23 24 24 Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 18% 11% 18% 15% 21% 17% 17% 20% 15% 39% 29% 17% Fully agree 41% 54% 43% 42% 40% 43% 37% 42% 46% 30% 50% 46% Partly agree 21% 19% 16% 21% 23% 20% 23% 23% 20% 13% 13% 17% Neither argee nor disagree 7% 6% 8% 9% 6% 8% 8% 5% 6% 13% 0% 4% Partly disagree 9% 6% 10% 11% 6% 9% 12% 8% 9% 4% 4% 0% Fully disagree 4% 4% 5% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 4% 0% 4% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION
  • 66. 67 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION ALL n=1839 ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. The supervising professor's guidance was well organised and informative. 2. Guidance was sufficiently available. 3. Cooperation between the university and my client carried out well in guiding the thesis work. 4. I received sufficiently guidance from my client for the thesis work. Cannot answer / Doesn't fit 3% 1% 25% 18% Fully disagree 2% 3% 3% 4% Partly disagree 6% 11% 5% 9% Neither argee nor disagree 4% 7% 8% 7% Partly agree 23% 27% 20% 21% Fully agree 62% 50% 38% 41% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 67.
  • 68. 6. WORKING ALONG STUDIES Amount of working during the studies – Total – Within own line of studies – Abroad Working and progress of studies
  • 69. 70TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK WORK EXPERIENCE GAINED DURING THE STUDIES Work experience gained during the studies, total (excl. M.Sc. thesis), months ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 821 96 253 282 216 849 598 173 134 22 24 23 More than 2 years 39% 24% 51% 43% 45% 44% 37% 34% 30% 27% 50% 26% 1-2 yars 35% 49% 29% 34% 28% 33% 37% 34% 48% 50% 25% 39% Less than 1 year 18% 22% 16% 18% 19% 18% 19% 19% 15% 23% 13% 17% Not alt all 7% 5% 4% 5% 9% 6% 8% 13% 8% 0% 13% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 70. 71 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK WORK EXPERIENCE GAINED DURING THE STUDIES Work experience of own field gained during the studies (excl. M.Sc. thesis), months ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 797 95 253 278 212 840 589 167 134 22 23 24 More than 2 years 26% 8% 36% 28% 36% 30% 24% 22% 15% 18% 39% 13% 1-2 yars 30% 42% 23% 34% 28% 30% 29% 25% 41% 32% 26% 17% Less than 1 year 28% 34% 25% 28% 24% 27% 31% 28% 28% 41% 13% 42% Not alt all 16% 17% 16% 11% 12% 14% 16% 25% 16% 9% 22% 29% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 71. 72TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK Did working during studies affect the progress of your studies? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 797 94 254 276 213 839 589 172 133 22 24 20 Yes, it accelerated my studies 3% 2% 3% 3% 5% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 4% 0% Yes, it slowed down my studies 50% 29% 58% 49% 58% 52% 51% 48% 40% 41% 50% 35% No 47% 69% 39% 48% 37% 45% 47% 49% 55% 55% 46% 65% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% WORKING AND PROGRESS OF STUDIES
  • 72.
  • 73.
  • 74. 7. EMPLOYMENT Situation at the time of graduation Type of work contract Type of work Operating sector Principal duties Organizational position Basic salary Previous relation with the employer Method of recruitment Location of the job Working abroad Quality of employment
  • 75. 76TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SITUATION AT THE TIME OF GRADUATION Describe your situation at the time of graduation. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM , n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 872 97 264 289 223 875 609 180 138 22 25 25 Other 5 % 6 % 6 % 6 % 2 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 8 % 5 % 8 % 4 % I'm working as an entrepreneur. 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 4 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 4 % 0 % I am seeking for a job. 25 % 37 % 25 % 21 % 19 % 23 % 25 % 27 % 26 % 50 % 40 % 40 % I know, where I'm going to be employed. 10 % 11 % 8 % 13 % 14 % 11 % 11 % 6 % 10 % 0 % 0 % 4 % I have a work contract. 58 % 45 % 60 % 60 % 61 % 59 % 59 % 61 % 56 % 46 % 48 % 52 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 76. 77 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SITUATION AT THE TIME OF GRADUATION I work as a full-time doctoral candidate. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 194 53 169 187 154 564 399 112 87 10 12 11 No 94% 91% 92% 98% 88% 93% 96% 93% 93% 100% 100% 100% Yes 6% 9% 8% 2% 12% 7% 4% 7% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 77. 78TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK TYPE OF WORK CONTRACT IF EMPLOYED ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 245 55 178 200 162 595 413 115 88 10 12 12 Other 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 8% 8% Fixed-term / temporary contract 34% 49% 32% 24% 27% 29% 36% 37% 48% 20% 50% 33% Permanent contract 65% 51% 67% 76% 70% 69% 63% 63% 50% 80% 42% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 78. 79 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 245 54 178 200 163 596 412 116 88 10 12 12 Part-time 5% 7% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 10% 17% 0% Full-time 95% 93% 95% 96% 95% 95% 95% 98% 98% 90% 83% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% TYPE OF WORK IF EMPLOYED
  • 79. 80TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 246 55 177 200 162 595 414 116 88 10 12 12 Other 1% 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% Association / Third sector 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Central government 1% 2% 1% 3% 0% 2% 1% 3% 1% 10% 0% 0% Local government 3% 0% 2% 6% 0% 2% 2% 5% 2% 10% 8% 0% Research institute 2% 6% 3% 3% 4% 4% 1% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% University 12% 22% 12% 7% 13% 11% 14% 11% 15% 0% 0% 17% Private sector 80% 71% 81% 82% 80% 80% 81% 78% 78% 80% 92% 83% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% OPERATING SECTOR IF EMPLOYED
  • 80. 81 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK PRINCIPAL DUTIES IF EMPLOYED ALL, n= A a l t o C H E M , n= A a l t o E L E C , n= A a l t o ENG, n= A a l t o SCI, n= A a l t o ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1  232 54 174 196 160 585 412 115 87 10 12 12 Research and development 21 % 41 % 25 % 13 % 26 % 23 % 20 % 17 % 23 % 0 % 8 % 33 % Various project duties 19 % 13 % 14 % 29 % 10 % 18 % 20 % 21 % 23 % 30 % 17 % 8 % Product development 18 % 4 % 33 % 13 % 21 % 21 % 17 % 16 % 18 % 20 % 17 % 8 % Consulting 13 % 4 % 10 % 20 % 24 % 16 % 11 % 5 % 13 % 20 % 0 % 8 % Production, manufacturing and maintenance 10 % 20 % 5 % 8 % 5 % 7 % 12 % 11 % 12 % 20 % 0 % 8 % Other 7 % 4 % 4 % 6 % 5 % 5 % 9 % 8 % 3 % 0 % 17 % 17 % Strategic planning and leadership 3 % 2 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 4 % 2 % 5 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 8 % Sales and marketing 3 % 2 % 2 % 2 % 3 % 2 % 3 % 6 % 1 % 0 % 25 % 8 % Logistics and procurement 2 % 6 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 5 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Quality management 2 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 17 % 0 % Administration and finance 1 % 0 % 1 % 3 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 3 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Teaching and training 1 % 4 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 1 % 10 % 0 % 0 %
  • 81. 82TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK ORGANIZATIONAL POSITION IF EMPLOYED ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 238 54 175 199 161 590 414 114 87 10 12 12 Other 13% 23% 13% 7% 10% 11% 14% 9% 14% 20% 8% 50% Entrepreneur 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Expert 76% 74% 81% 85% 79% 81% 74% 72% 67% 80% 75% 33% Middle management 8% 4% 3% 7% 8% 6% 10% 13% 17% 0% 17% 0% Management 2% 0% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 5% 1% 0% 0% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 82. 83 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK BASIC SALARY IF EMPLOYED Basic salary, EUR /month ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 879 (all) 40 121 141 122 425 283 74 71 <10 <10 <10 727 (private) 30 102 115 98 346 240 62 56 <10 <10 <10 Median, all sectors 3080 3000 3200 3200 3342 3200 3000 3000 3000 3000 2825 3050 Median, private sector 3200 3175 3300 3300 3500 3300 3073 3000 3000 3000 2825 3100 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
  • 83. 84TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK PREVIOUS RELATION WITH THE EMPLOYER IF EMPLOYED ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM , n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 229 54 175 197 161 588 410 112 87 10 11 12 Something else 5% 6% 7% 6% 3% 5% 4% 7% 5% 10% 0% 0% No previous relation 19% 19% 17% 19% 29% 21% 15% 25% 16% 40% 9% 33% Yes, based work experience (excl. Master's thesis work) 29% 17% 31% 35% 29% 30% 28% 27% 23% 40% 27% 17% Yes, based on Master's thesis 47% 59% 45% 41% 40% 43% 52% 41% 56% 10% 64% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Do you have a previous relation with your employer?
  • 84. 85 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK How did you get your current job? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHE M, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1234 54 175 198 160 588 412 113 87 10 12 12 Something else 2% 4% 2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 10% 0% 0% Recruiting services, events & programs, other 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Recruiting services, events & programs, university 5% 0% 7% 3% 8% 5% 6% 3% 6% 0% 8% 17% Personal contacts & networks 38% 50% 42% 41% 32% 40% 34% 43% 38% 20% 75% 58% "Headhunting" 5% 2% 2% 4% 11% 5% 5% 9% 6% 0% 0% 8% Open application & contacting 18% 13% 17% 22% 14% 18% 22% 12% 16% 30% 0% 8% Reply to public announcement 30% 32% 29% 28% 33% 30% 31% 31% 32% 40% 17% 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% METHOD OF RECRUITMENT IF EMPLOYED
  • 85. 86TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK LOCATION OF THE JOB IF EMPLOYED
  • 86. 87 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK LOCATION OF THE JOB IF ABROAD Arttu  Piri017 f  abroad
  • 87. 88TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK QUALITY OF EMPLOYMENT IF EMPLOYED How well does the content of your job correspond with your field of studies? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1238 54 175 199 161 590 414 114 87 10 12 12 Unable to answer 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Very well 46 % 48 % 42 % 47 % 54 % 48 % 48 % 38 % 43 % 30 % 42 % 50 % Well 32 % 28 % 31 % 32 % 35 % 32 % 32 % 32 % 38 % 20 % 25 % 25 % Moderately 16 % 15 % 13 % 18 % 11 % 14 % 16 % 24 % 13 % 30 % 25 % 8 % Poorly 3 % 4 % 7 % 2 % 0 % 3 % 3 % 6 % 6 % 0 % 0 % 8 % Very poorly 1 % 0 % 4 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8 % Not at all 1 % 6 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 20 % 8 % 0 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 88. 89 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK QUALITY OF EMPLOYMENT IF EMPLOYED How well does the level of demand in your job correspond with your educational level? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto ARTS, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 234 1 54 175 196 161 587 413 115 87 10 11 12 Unable to answer 1% 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Very well 39% 100% 46% 37% 39% 51% 43% 38% 31% 35% 50% 18% 33% Well 38% 0% 26% 39% 38% 38% 37% 38% 37% 39% 10% 46% 50% Moderately 17% 0% 17% 18% 16% 9% 15% 17% 22% 20% 30% 27% 17% Poorly 3% 0% 6% 3% 4% 1% 3% 3% 6% 5% 0% 0% 0% Very poorly 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% Not at all 1% 0% 4% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 10% 9% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 89.
  • 90. 8. SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES Reselection of education Satisfaction with the studies
  • 91. 92TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK RESELECTION OF EDUCATION If you could choose again, which basic degree or other education would you choose now? ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM , n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 781 96 251 271 213 833 589 163 133 22 23 20 Other education 4% 4% 4% 5% 1% 4% 4% 2% 7% 5% 0% 5% University education, not Tech 9% 10% 10% 8% 8% 9% 10% 11% 10% 5% 13% 5% Other degree programme/major in Tech 17% 27% 21% 20% 11% 19% 16% 12% 19% 23% 4% 15% Current degree programme/major 70% 58% 65% 67% 81% 69% 70% 75% 65% 68% 83% 75% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 92. 93 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES 1. The skills I acquired in my education meet my expectations. ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 796 95 251 273 210 831 598 169 133 21 24 22 Unable to answer 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 5% 0% 0% I agree 48% 45% 46% 49% 64% 51% 47% 52% 35% 43% 38% 46% I somewhat agree 39% 39% 36% 34% 29% 34% 41% 41% 54% 43% 50% 41% I somewhat disagree 9% 11% 12% 15% 4% 11% 8% 6% 9% 10% 13% 14% I disagree 2% 4% 4% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 93. 94TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES 2. My education meets my expectations ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 789 95 251 270 210 828 594 169 133 21 24 22 Unable to answer 4 % 4 % 5 % 6 % 2 % 4 % 3 % 1 % 4 % 5 % 4 % 0 % I agree 49 % 42 % 46 % 46 % 61 % 49 % 49 % 57 % 45 % 48 % 42 % 41 % I somewhat agree 38 % 41 % 35 % 36 % 32 % 35 % 41 % 36 % 42 % 29 % 42 % 50 % I somewhat disagree 7 % 11 % 11 % 10 % 2 % 9 % 6 % 5 % 8 % 19 % 13 % 9 % I disagree 2 % 2 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 94. 95 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK 3. The teaching was to a large extent of good quality ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 791 94 249 272 210 827 595 171 133 21 24 22 Unable to answer 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % I agree 47 % 43 % 37 % 42 % 52 % 43 % 49 % 62 % 38 % 57 % 33 % 50 % I somewhat agree 40 % 37 % 41 % 43 % 33 % 39 % 40 % 29 % 52 % 43 % 58 % 46 % I somewhat disagree 11 % 18 % 17 % 10 % 11 % 13 % 8 % 9 % 10 % 0 % 8 % 5 % I disagree 3 % 2 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 4 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES
  • 95. 96TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES 4. I am satisfied with the used teaching methods ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 796 95 249 273 210 829 598 171 133 21 24 22 Unable to answer 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 5 % I agree 32 % 32 % 29 % 26 % 38 % 31 % 33 % 46 % 20 % 43 % 33 % 32 % I somewhat agree 49 % 44 % 44 % 50 % 47 % 47 % 49 % 46 % 60 % 38 % 50 % 59 % I somewhat disagree 15 % 21 % 19 % 19 % 12 % 18 % 14 % 6 % 20 % 19 % 17 % 5 % I disagree 3 % 3 % 8 % 4 % 3 % 5 % 3 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 96. 97 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES 5. Contents of the studies were up-to-date ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 793 95 249 272 208 826 598 171 133 21 24 22 Unable to answer 2 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 5 % 0 % 5 % I agree 43 % 48 % 37 % 39 % 51 % 43 % 43 % 48 % 40 % 43 % 54 % 27 % I somewhat agree 41 % 41 % 43 % 42 % 36 % 41 % 39 % 42 % 46 % 43 % 29 % 64 % I somewhat disagree 13 % 6 % 14 % 15 % 12 % 13 % 15 % 9 % 12 % 10 % 17 % 5 % I disagree 2 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 1 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 97. 98TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES 6. Research results from the field were applied to teaching ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 787 94 250 272 207 825 594 170 133 21 24 22 Unable to answer 4 % 3 % 5 % 3 % 3 % 4 % 3 % 2 % 4 % 5 % 4 % 9 % I agree 52 % 65 % 51 % 49 % 57 % 54 % 49 % 55 % 48 % 62 % 58 % 41 % I somewhat agree 37 % 20 % 36 % 40 % 30 % 34 % 40 % 37 % 38 % 29 % 29 % 41 % I somewhat disagree 7 % 12 % 6 % 6 % 8 % 7 % 7 % 6 % 9 % 5 % 8 % 9 % I disagree 1 % 0 % 1 % 2 % 2 % 2 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 98. 99 TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES 7. I am satisfied with the education that I have received ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 ALL, n= Aalto ARTS, n= Aalto CHEM, n= Aalto ELEC, n= Aalto ENG, n= Aalto SCI, n= Aalto ALL, n= TUT, n= LUT, n= UO, n= UT, n= UV, n= ÅAU, n= 1 781 2 93 250 272 207 824 593 167 132 21 24 22 Unable to answer 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% I agree 59% 50% 57% 52% 55% 71% 58% 60% 67% 49% 57% 50% 59% I somewhat agree 33% 50% 34% 34% 35% 25% 32% 33% 28% 44% 38% 38% 32% I somewhat disagree 6% 0% 7% 11% 7% 1% 7% 4% 5% 8% 5% 13% 9% I disagree 1% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 99. 100TEKNIIKAN AKATEEMISET TEK SATISFACTION WITH THE STUDIES ALL n=1796 ©TEK Graduate Survey 2016 1. The skills I acquired in my education meet my expectations. 2. My education meets my expectations. 3. The teaching was to a large extent of good quality. 4. I am satisfied with the used teaching methods. 5. Contents of the studies were upto- date. 6. Research results from the field were applied to teaching. 7. I am satisfied with the education that I have received. Unable to answer 2% 4% 1% 1% 2% 4% 1% I agree 48% 49% 47% 32% 43% 52% 59% I somewhat agree 39% 38% 40% 49% 41% 37% 33% I somewhat disagree 9% 7% 11% 15% 13% 7% 6% I disagree 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
  • 100. TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2016 Academic Engineers and Architects in Finland TEK and Finnish universities in technology together carry out a yearly feedback survey for graduated academic engineers and architects. The feedback and results are utilized in developing university education and influencing the educational policy making. More information: Jari Jokinen, jari.jokinen@tek.fi Arttu Piri, arttu.piri@tek.fi www.tek.fi/vastavalmistuneet