SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 6
Baixar para ler offline
Evaluation of Red Cell Hemolysis in Packed Red Cells
During Processing and Storage
Original Article
INTRODUCTION
There is as yet no substitute for human blood and its
components.Inrecentyearstheneedforstrictercontrolover
the quality of blood and its products has been emphasised.
One such quality indicator for stored red cell units is the
extent of hemolysis.
Hemolysis represents the breakdown or disruption of
the integrity of the red blood cell membranes causing the
release of haemoglobin. Hemolysis of red cell units occurs
during preparation of components as well as during storage,
issue and transport to the patient. Hemolysis in blood
products is usually manifested by the presence of free
haemoglobin in the red cell suspending media, such as
plasma or additive solutions.
Storage of red cells causes a progressive increase in
hemolysis. The extent of hemolysis can be estimated by
various techniques, visual assessment being the most
common. Others include spectrophotometric assays,
photometric method and microplate technique [1-4].
In spite of the increasing use of additive solutions for
storage of red cells, some amount of hemolysis is inevitable.
The extent of hemolysis, to some extent varies with the
composition of the additive solution used.ADSOLcontains
50% more adenine and 150% more glucose in addition to
750 mg/dL of mannitol than does SAGM. The presence of
leukocytes in the red cell units contribute significantly to an
increase in red cell hemolysis during storage [5-7]. This is
due to the release of various chemicals and enzymes,
especially proteases from the leukocytes. For the same
reason various leukocyte reduction filters are commercially
available.The presence of mannitol in theADSOLmedium
reduces hemolysis even in the presence of leukocyte
proteases. The percentage hemolysis progressively
increases with the day of storage, irrespective of which
additive solution has been used and whether or not the units
are leucoreduced. However, even on day 42nd of storage,
free haemoglobin in any of the red cell units should not
exceed the permissible level which is 0.8%, as per the
Council of Europe guidelines [8] and 1% as per the US
FDA guidelines [9].
35 Apollo Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2010
EVALUATION OF RED CELL HEMOLYSIS IN PACKED RED CELLS DURING
PROCESSING AND STORAGE
R N Makroo*, Vimarsh Raina**, Aakanksha Bhatia***, Richa Gupta†
, Abdul Majid‡
,
Uday Kumar Thakur‡‡
and N L Rosamma††
*Director, **Senior Consultant, ***Research Fellow, †Post Graduate, ‡
MSc Trainee, ‡‡
Technologist (Quality), ††
Senior
Technologist, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi-110076, India.
Correspondence to: Dr RN Makroo, Director, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals,
Sarita Vihar, New Delhi 110 076, India.
E-mail: makroo@apollohospitals.com
Introduction: Storage of red cells causes a progressive increase in hemolysis. Inspite of the use of additive
solutions for storage and filters for leucoreduction some amount of hemolysis is still inevitable. The extent of
hemolysis however should not exceed the permissible threshold for hemolysis even on the 42nd day of
storage.Study design and Methods: Eighty units of packed red cells, 40 stored in SAGM post leucoreduction
and 40 inADSOL without leucoreduction filters, were evaluated for plasma haemoglobin by HemoCue Plasma
Haemoglobin analyzer on the day of collection and on the 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, 35th and 42nd days thereafter.
The haemoglobin and haematocrit were also noted for all these units by the Beckman & Coulter analyzer.
Percentage Hemolysis was then calculated. Observations: Hemolysis progressively increased with the
storage period in all the stored red cell units (SAGM as well ADSOL). However, on day 42nd of storage, free
haemoglobin in all the red cell units was within the permissible level (which is 0.8% according to the Council of
Europe guidelines and 1% as per the US FDA guidelines.
The mean percentage hemolysis was slightly higher
in the SAGM containing bags with an integral leucoreduction filter as compared to the bags containingADSOL.
However this difference was marginal and not statistically significant. Conclusion: Hemolysis of the red cells
increases with storage. However, maximum hemolysis does not exceed the permissible limits at any time
thereby indicating the effect of optimum processing and storage conditions on red cell hemolysis.
Key words: Hemolysis, Leucoreduction, Additive solutions, Haematocrit.
Apollo Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2010 36
Original Article
RESULTS
In the PRC units stored in SAGM, the least hemolysis
was observed on the day of collection (Mean = 0.1%), and
the maximum hemolysis was observed on the 42nd day of
storage (Mean = 0.553%). Similarly, in the PRC units that
were stored in ADSOL, an increase in the percentage
hemolysis was observed from a mean of 0.087% on day 0
to 0.538% on the 42nd day (Tables 1&2).
The maximum percentage hemolysis shown by any
sample was 0.710% in SAGM and 0.697% in ADSOL. It
was also noted that the mean percentage hemolysis on
each evaluation was slightly higher in 3-4 log
leoucoreduced PRC units stored in SAGM as compared to
those stored in ADSOL (Fig.1). However, the difference
was not statistically significant. None of the samples
showed percentage hemolysis of more than 0.8%, which is
the maximum acceptable limit of hemolysis as per the
Council of Europe Guidelines.
DISCUSSION
RBC units are prepared predominantly as concentrates
(packed red cells) re-suspended in additive solutions
(SAGM / ADSOL) at our center. This prospective study
was taken up to evaluate the extent of hemolysis during
AIMS
The aim of the study was to evaluate the extent of RBC
hemolysis with storage and the effect of leucoreduction
and composition of the additive solution on the same.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present study on red cell hemolysis in packed red
cells during processing and storage, was conducted at the
Department of Transfusion Medicine, IndraprasthaApollo
Hospitals, New Delhi, between May-October-2009.
A total of 80 whole blood units were collected in CPD
anticoagulant. After a holding period of at least 30
minutes, the components were separated from these blood
units. Forty of the PRC units were stored in blood bags
containing SAGM following 3 to 4 log leucoreduction via
integral filters and 40 units were stored in ADSOL
containing bags, without integral filters giving only 1 log
leucoreduction.
All the packed red cell units were evaluated for plasma
haemoglobin by HemoCue plasma haemoglobin analyzer.
The first sample was collected immediately after
processing, which was considered as the ‘Day 0’ sample.
Subsequently, all red cell units were stored under standard
storage conditions at 2-6o C.
Further evaluation was done 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, 35th
and 42nd days of collection. The haemoglobin and
haematocrit were also noted for all units each time by the
Beckman & Coulter analyzer.
Each time 10 mL of the sample was collected
aseptically from the units and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for
10 minutes. A large drop of the supernatant was pipetted
out on the slide and the Plasma/Low Hb cuvette was filled
from the drop. This was then inserted into the Hemocue
photometer and the results were recorded.
The percentage hemolysis was calculated by
measuring the total Hb content, haematocrit and
supernatant Hb content of the PRC units using the
following formula:
Hemolysis = Plasma Hb × (1-Hct) × 100
B-Hb
Hb- Haemoglobin
Hct- Haematocrit
B-Hb- Blood Haemoglobin
The data collected from the study was tabulated & then
statistically evaluated to produce the following results.
Table 1. Hemolysis in SAGM containing bags
Day after Minimum Maximum Mean
collection hemolysis hemolysis
0 0.059% 0.139% 0.1%
7 0.130% 0.236% 0.175%
14 0.203% 0.332% 0.256%
21 0.254% 0.403% 0.330%
28 0.314% 0.517% 0.4%
35 0.407% 0.602% 0.475%
42 0.465% 0.710% 0.553%
Table 2. Hemolysis inADSOL containing bags
Day after Minimum Maximum Mean
collection hemolysis hemolysis
0 0.05% 0.156% 0.087%
7 0.083% 0.296% 0.165%
14 0.149% 0.358% 0.248%
21 0.193% 0.481% 0.315%
28 0.260% 0.553% 0.391%
35 0.329% 0.625% 0.467%
42 0.414% 0.697% 0.538%
Original Article
37 Apollo Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2010
storage of packed red cells using two different additive
solutions, and the effect of leucoreduction on the same. It
was observed that the percentage hemolysis progressively
increases from day 0 to day 42 of storage both in bags
containingADSOL (0.087 to 0.538) as well as SAGM (0.1
to 0.553) as additive solutions. It was also noted that the
units that contained ADSOL as an additive solution
showed slightly lower levels of hemolysis (maximum
hemolysis being 0.697%) with respect to those containing
SAGM (Maximum hemolysis being 0.710%), even
though the later were provided with integral
leucoreduction filters. However, none of the units showed
hemolysis more than the permissible limits, even on the
42nd day. At our center, we strictly follow the standard
processing and storage guidelines. This could account for
the satisfactory results obtained in our study.
Of the various methods that are available for the
assessment of hemolysis the visual method is the simplest,
however the result are often inaccurate, misleading and
result in over estimation of hemolysis in red blood cells
units [2]. In a study comparing spectrophotometric
method and the photometric methods, Cardigan, et al
demonstrated that both methods gave comparable results
[10]. We in our study adopted the photometric method
(HemoCue plasma haemoglobin analyzer) for assessment
of hemolysis.
Many authors in India as well as across the world have
demonstrated that RBC hemolysis increases with the
storage period of PRC [11,12]. In one such study Sawant,
et al [11] evaluated plasma haemoglobin levels using the
tetramethylbenzidiene (TMB) method on day 1, 7, 14, 21
and 28 of collection. The hemolysis in all the PRC units
increased with the day of storage. These findings were in
confirmation with those in our study.
Besides this they also observed that hemolysis in units
that were stored in SAGM was higher compared to the
units stored in ADSOL. In another study, Zimmerman, et
al [1] also observed slightly higher level of hemolysis in
SAGM containing bags. They attributed this increase to
the preparatory technique which they used (the PRP
method).
Other authors believe that this difference in the level of
hemolysis between SAGM andADSOL containing bags is
due to the difference in composition of the two additive
solutions. ADSOL contains 50% more adenine and 150%
more glucose in addition to 750 mg/dL of mannitol than
does SAGM. Mannitol acts as a membrane stabilizer and
dextrose is required for the metabolism of stored red cells
[11]. This could also account for the lower levels of
hemolysis inADSOLcontaining bags in our study.
It has also been described by various authors that the
presence of leukocytes in the red cell units contribute
significantly to an increase in red cell hemolysis during
storage, [7,10,11] and that prestorage filtration helps in
reducing the extent of this hemolysis [13,14]. This is due
to the release of various chemicals and enzymes,
especially proteases from the leukocytes. For the same
reason various leukocytes reduction filters are
commercially available. On the other hand, there have
been a few reports in literature showing an increase in
hemolysis with the use of leucoreduction filters [15,16].
In our study the difference in the level of hemolysis
was higher in SAGM bags (with leucoreduction filters)
than in the corresponding ADSOL containing bags, but
did not reach significance.
CONCLUSION
Hemolysis is a very important parameter for assessing
the quality of stored RBC’s. On assessing the effect of
duration of storage on red cell hemolysis, we concluded
that there is a progressive increase in the percentage
hemolysis with storage, irrespective of the additive
solution used. However, the extent of hemolysis does not
exceed the recommended limits at any time during storage
thereby indicating efficacy of the processing and storage
protocol followed at our center. Further, no significant
difference was noted in the extent of hemolysis between 3
to 4 log leucoreduced PRC units stored in SAGM and the
1 log leucoreduced PRC units stored inADSOL.
REFERENCES
1. Zimmermann R, Heidenreich D, Weisbach V, et al. In
Fig.1. Comparison between SAGM and ADSOL
Apollo Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2010 38
Original Article
vitro quality control of red blood cell concentrates
outdated in clinical practice. Transfusion Clinique et
Biologique. 2003; 10: 275-283.
2. Janatpour KA, Paglieroni TG, Crocker VL, et al. Visual
assessment of hemolysis in red cell units and segments
can be deceptive. Transfusion 2004; 44: 984-989.
3. Cookson P, Sutherland J, Cardigan RA. Simple
Spectrophotometric method for the quantification of
residual haemoglobin in platelet concentrates. Vox
Sanguinis 2004; 87: 264-271.
4. Seghatchian J, Krailadsiri P, Beard M, Vickers M.
Development of a Microplate method for the
measurement of plasma haemoglobin and its use in
monitoring the storage lesion of red cell components.
Transfus Apher Sci; 2002; 26: 91-93.
5. Greenwalt TJ, Zehner Sostock C, Dumaswala UJ.
Studies in red blood cells preservation. Effect on the
other formed elements .Vox Sang 1990; 58: 85-89.
6. Humbert JR, Fermin CD, Winser EL. Early damage to
granulocytes during storage. Semin Hematol 1991; 28:
10-13.
7. Heaton WA, Holmes S, Smith K, et al. Effects of 3-5 logs
10 prestorage leukocytes depletion on red cell storage
and metabolism. Br J Hematol 1994; 87: 363-368.
8. Guide to the preparation, use and quality assurance of
blood components. Council of Europe Publishing. 6th ed.
Strasbourg Cedex Germany, 2000.
9. FDA summary basis of approval of red blood cells frozen
and red blood cells deglycerolized (reference no. 86-
0335). Applicant- Department of the Navy, Naval
Hospital. Bethesda, MD, US License Number 635-10,
1986.
10. Cardigan R, Smith K. Evaluation HemoCue plasma
hemoglobin analyzer for assessing hemolysis in Red cell
concentrates during storage, Vox Sanguinis 2002; 82:
76-79.
11. Sawant RB, Jathar SK, Rajadhyaksha SB, Kadam PT.
Red cell hemolysis during processing and storage, Asian
Journal of Transfusion 2007; 1: 47-51.
12. Samuel O. Sowemimo-Coker: Red blood cell hemolysis
during processing.Transfusion Medicine Reviews: 2002;
16 (1),46-60.
13. Rogers SE, Edmondson D, Goodrick MJ, et al.
Prestorage white cell reduction in saline-adenine-
glucose-mannitol red cells by use of an integral filter :
evaluation of storage values and in vivo recovery.
Transfusion 1995; 35:727-733.
14. Heaton WAL, Holme S, Smith K, et al. Effects of 3-5 log10
pre-storage leucocyte depletion on red cell storage and
metabolism. Br.J.Hematol 1994; 87: 363-368.
15. Gammon RR, Strayer SA, Avery NL, Mintz PD.
Hemolysis during leukocyte-reduction filtration of stored
red blood cells. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2000; 30:195.
16. Muller-Steinhardt M, Janetzko K, Kandler R, et al. Impact
of various red cell concentrate preparation methods on
the efficiency of prestorage white cell filtration and on red
cells during storage for 42 days. Transfusion 1997; 37:
1137-1142.
Evaluation of Red Cell Hemolysis in Packed Red Cells During Processing and Storage

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Staff Meeting Powerpoint
Staff Meeting PowerpointStaff Meeting Powerpoint
Staff Meeting Powerpoint
Johnny Mackey
 
Jeevani ( Role of clinical biochemistry in laboratory)
Jeevani ( Role of clinical biochemistry in laboratory)Jeevani ( Role of clinical biochemistry in laboratory)
Jeevani ( Role of clinical biochemistry in laboratory)
Potu Jeevani
 
Clinical Chemistry
Clinical ChemistryClinical Chemistry
Clinical Chemistry
guestbc65a9
 

Mais procurados (20)

Laboratory approach to anemias
Laboratory approach to anemiasLaboratory approach to anemias
Laboratory approach to anemias
 
Staff Meeting Powerpoint
Staff Meeting PowerpointStaff Meeting Powerpoint
Staff Meeting Powerpoint
 
Eric Hoste - Colloids versus crystalloids - IFAD 2011
Eric Hoste - Colloids versus crystalloids - IFAD 2011Eric Hoste - Colloids versus crystalloids - IFAD 2011
Eric Hoste - Colloids versus crystalloids - IFAD 2011
 
Blood component therapy and blood substitutes
Blood component therapy and blood substitutes Blood component therapy and blood substitutes
Blood component therapy and blood substitutes
 
2.colloids
2.colloids2.colloids
2.colloids
 
The clinical laboratory
The clinical laboratoryThe clinical laboratory
The clinical laboratory
 
Ntc hematology may_1_2013
Ntc hematology may_1_2013Ntc hematology may_1_2013
Ntc hematology may_1_2013
 
Normal Saline is not Normal? ; Chloride liberal vs. Chloride restrictive IV F...
Normal Saline is not Normal? ; Chloride liberal vs. Chloride restrictive IV F...Normal Saline is not Normal? ; Chloride liberal vs. Chloride restrictive IV F...
Normal Saline is not Normal? ; Chloride liberal vs. Chloride restrictive IV F...
 
Specimen receiving
Specimen receivingSpecimen receiving
Specimen receiving
 
Jeevani ( Role of clinical biochemistry in laboratory)
Jeevani ( Role of clinical biochemistry in laboratory)Jeevani ( Role of clinical biochemistry in laboratory)
Jeevani ( Role of clinical biochemistry in laboratory)
 
Hplc interpretation
Hplc interpretationHplc interpretation
Hplc interpretation
 
Haemoglobin ss
Haemoglobin ssHaemoglobin ss
Haemoglobin ss
 
Atorvastatin dta
Atorvastatin dtaAtorvastatin dta
Atorvastatin dta
 
Reviewbasic 130709233435-phpapp02
Reviewbasic 130709233435-phpapp02Reviewbasic 130709233435-phpapp02
Reviewbasic 130709233435-phpapp02
 
Blood collection tubes - Colour coding of vials, Order of draw
Blood collection tubes  - Colour coding of vials, Order of drawBlood collection tubes  - Colour coding of vials, Order of draw
Blood collection tubes - Colour coding of vials, Order of draw
 
Fluids in Intensive Care
Fluids in Intensive Care Fluids in Intensive Care
Fluids in Intensive Care
 
Hematology technique 1
Hematology technique 1Hematology technique 1
Hematology technique 1
 
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratoryClinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory
 
Clinical Chemistry
Clinical ChemistryClinical Chemistry
Clinical Chemistry
 
Capillary versus hplc 2016
Capillary versus hplc 2016Capillary versus hplc 2016
Capillary versus hplc 2016
 

Semelhante a Evaluation of Red Cell Hemolysis in Packed Red Cells During Processing and Storage

Transfusion Medicine Ticu
Transfusion Medicine TicuTransfusion Medicine Ticu
Transfusion Medicine Ticu
Dang Thanh Tuan
 
Blood transfusion part 1
Blood transfusion part 1Blood transfusion part 1
Blood transfusion part 1
Preetam Manoli
 
Blood component therapy in newborn and children jyoti
Blood component therapy in newborn and children jyotiBlood component therapy in newborn and children jyoti
Blood component therapy in newborn and children jyoti
dr jyoti prajapati
 

Semelhante a Evaluation of Red Cell Hemolysis in Packed Red Cells During Processing and Storage (20)

Transfusion Medicine
Transfusion MedicineTransfusion Medicine
Transfusion Medicine
 
Transfusion Medicine Ticu
Transfusion Medicine TicuTransfusion Medicine Ticu
Transfusion Medicine Ticu
 
Laboratory hematology
Laboratory hematologyLaboratory hematology
Laboratory hematology
 
Blood component transfusion in criticalcare now
Blood component transfusion in criticalcare nowBlood component transfusion in criticalcare now
Blood component transfusion in criticalcare now
 
reticulocyte.pptx
reticulocyte.pptxreticulocyte.pptx
reticulocyte.pptx
 
Resealed erythrocytes
Resealed erythrocytesResealed erythrocytes
Resealed erythrocytes
 
Immunology and cell culture techniques
Immunology and cell culture techniquesImmunology and cell culture techniques
Immunology and cell culture techniques
 
Sample collection, Preservation and its Estimation
Sample collection, Preservation and its EstimationSample collection, Preservation and its Estimation
Sample collection, Preservation and its Estimation
 
Management of health laboratory services
Management of health laboratory servicesManagement of health laboratory services
Management of health laboratory services
 
Management of health laboratory services
Management of health laboratory servicesManagement of health laboratory services
Management of health laboratory services
 
blood transfusion nigat.pptx
blood transfusion  nigat.pptxblood transfusion  nigat.pptx
blood transfusion nigat.pptx
 
Integrated hemolysis monitoring for bottom-up protein bioanalysis
Integrated hemolysis monitoring for bottom-up protein bioanalysisIntegrated hemolysis monitoring for bottom-up protein bioanalysis
Integrated hemolysis monitoring for bottom-up protein bioanalysis
 
Blood component therapy aarti
Blood component therapy  aartiBlood component therapy  aarti
Blood component therapy aarti
 
Blood components
Blood componentsBlood components
Blood components
 
laboratory diagnosis of hemolytic anemia-190509145931.pptx
laboratory diagnosis of hemolytic anemia-190509145931.pptxlaboratory diagnosis of hemolytic anemia-190509145931.pptx
laboratory diagnosis of hemolytic anemia-190509145931.pptx
 
Biochemical changes in stored blood
Biochemical changes in stored bloodBiochemical changes in stored blood
Biochemical changes in stored blood
 
Blood transfusion part 1
Blood transfusion part 1Blood transfusion part 1
Blood transfusion part 1
 
Determination of Cholesterol Level in Human Serum
Determination of Cholesterol Level in Human SerumDetermination of Cholesterol Level in Human Serum
Determination of Cholesterol Level in Human Serum
 
Blood component therapy in newborn and children jyoti
Blood component therapy in newborn and children jyotiBlood component therapy in newborn and children jyoti
Blood component therapy in newborn and children jyoti
 
source of errors in clinical lab result.pdf
source of errors in clinical  lab result.pdfsource of errors in clinical  lab result.pdf
source of errors in clinical lab result.pdf
 

Mais de Apollo Hospitals

Mais de Apollo Hospitals (20)

Movement disorders: A complication of chronic hyperglycemia? A case report
Movement disorders: A complication of chronic hyperglycemia? A case reportMovement disorders: A complication of chronic hyperglycemia? A case report
Movement disorders: A complication of chronic hyperglycemia? A case report
 
Malignant Mixed Mullerian Tumor – Case Reports and Review Article
Malignant Mixed Mullerian Tumor – Case Reports and Review ArticleMalignant Mixed Mullerian Tumor – Case Reports and Review Article
Malignant Mixed Mullerian Tumor – Case Reports and Review Article
 
Intra-Fetal Laser Ablation of Umbilical Vessels in Acardiac Twin with Success...
Intra-Fetal Laser Ablation of Umbilical Vessels in Acardiac Twin with Success...Intra-Fetal Laser Ablation of Umbilical Vessels in Acardiac Twin with Success...
Intra-Fetal Laser Ablation of Umbilical Vessels in Acardiac Twin with Success...
 
Improved Patient Satisfaction At Apollo – A Case Study
Improved Patient Satisfaction At Apollo – A Case StudyImproved Patient Satisfaction At Apollo – A Case Study
Improved Patient Satisfaction At Apollo – A Case Study
 
Breast Cancer in Young Women and its Impact on Reproductive Function
Breast Cancer in Young Women and its Impact on Reproductive FunctionBreast Cancer in Young Women and its Impact on Reproductive Function
Breast Cancer in Young Women and its Impact on Reproductive Function
 
Turner's Syndrome
Turner's SyndromeTurner's Syndrome
Turner's Syndrome
 
Hypothyroidism in Pregnancy
Hypothyroidism in PregnancyHypothyroidism in Pregnancy
Hypothyroidism in Pregnancy
 
Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency
Adult Growth Hormone DeficiencyAdult Growth Hormone Deficiency
Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency
 
Bone Health Issues in Thalassemia
Bone Health Issues in ThalassemiaBone Health Issues in Thalassemia
Bone Health Issues in Thalassemia
 
Radiopaque Shadows in the Abdomen
Radiopaque Shadows in the AbdomenRadiopaque Shadows in the Abdomen
Radiopaque Shadows in the Abdomen
 
Laparoscopic Excision of Foregut Duplication Cyst of Stomach
Laparoscopic Excision of Foregut Duplication Cyst of StomachLaparoscopic Excision of Foregut Duplication Cyst of Stomach
Laparoscopic Excision of Foregut Duplication Cyst of Stomach
 
Occupational Blood Borne Infections: Prevention is Better than Cure
Occupational Blood Borne Infections: Prevention is Better than CureOccupational Blood Borne Infections: Prevention is Better than Cure
Occupational Blood Borne Infections: Prevention is Better than Cure
 
Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in the tr...
Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in the tr...Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in the tr...
Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in the tr...
 
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS)
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS)Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS)
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS)
 
Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-When and Where is the Need to Convert?
Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-When and Where is the Need to Convert?Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-When and Where is the Need to Convert?
Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-When and Where is the Need to Convert?
 
Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in a tertiary care center: An observational ...
Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in a tertiary care center: An observational ...Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in a tertiary care center: An observational ...
Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in a tertiary care center: An observational ...
 
Unusual Manifestations of Dengue Fever
Unusual Manifestations of Dengue FeverUnusual Manifestations of Dengue Fever
Unusual Manifestations of Dengue Fever
 
An unusual cause of dysphagia
An unusual cause of dysphagiaAn unusual cause of dysphagia
An unusual cause of dysphagia
 
Pediatric Liver Transplantation
Pediatric Liver TransplantationPediatric Liver Transplantation
Pediatric Liver Transplantation
 
Ultrasound Elastography
Ultrasound ElastographyUltrasound Elastography
Ultrasound Elastography
 

Último

❤️Amritsar Escorts Service☎️9815674956☎️ Call Girl service in Amritsar☎️ Amri...
❤️Amritsar Escorts Service☎️9815674956☎️ Call Girl service in Amritsar☎️ Amri...❤️Amritsar Escorts Service☎️9815674956☎️ Call Girl service in Amritsar☎️ Amri...
❤️Amritsar Escorts Service☎️9815674956☎️ Call Girl service in Amritsar☎️ Amri...
Sheetaleventcompany
 
Pune Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Pune No💰Adva...
Pune Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Pune No💰Adva...Pune Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Pune No💰Adva...
Pune Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Pune No💰Adva...
Sheetaleventcompany
 
Call Girl In Indore 📞9235973566📞 Just📲 Call Inaaya Indore Call Girls Service ...
Call Girl In Indore 📞9235973566📞 Just📲 Call Inaaya Indore Call Girls Service ...Call Girl In Indore 📞9235973566📞 Just📲 Call Inaaya Indore Call Girls Service ...
Call Girl In Indore 📞9235973566📞 Just📲 Call Inaaya Indore Call Girls Service ...
Sheetaleventcompany
 
👉 Chennai Sexy Aunty’s WhatsApp Number 👉📞 7427069034 👉📞 Just📲 Call Ruhi Colle...
👉 Chennai Sexy Aunty’s WhatsApp Number 👉📞 7427069034 👉📞 Just📲 Call Ruhi Colle...👉 Chennai Sexy Aunty’s WhatsApp Number 👉📞 7427069034 👉📞 Just📲 Call Ruhi Colle...
👉 Chennai Sexy Aunty’s WhatsApp Number 👉📞 7427069034 👉📞 Just📲 Call Ruhi Colle...
rajnisinghkjn
 
💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...
💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...
💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...
Sheetaleventcompany
 
💚Call Girls In Amritsar 💯Anvi 📲🔝8725944379🔝Amritsar Call Girl No💰Advance Cash...
💚Call Girls In Amritsar 💯Anvi 📲🔝8725944379🔝Amritsar Call Girl No💰Advance Cash...💚Call Girls In Amritsar 💯Anvi 📲🔝8725944379🔝Amritsar Call Girl No💰Advance Cash...
💚Call Girls In Amritsar 💯Anvi 📲🔝8725944379🔝Amritsar Call Girl No💰Advance Cash...
Sheetaleventcompany
 

Último (20)

❤️Amritsar Escorts Service☎️9815674956☎️ Call Girl service in Amritsar☎️ Amri...
❤️Amritsar Escorts Service☎️9815674956☎️ Call Girl service in Amritsar☎️ Amri...❤️Amritsar Escorts Service☎️9815674956☎️ Call Girl service in Amritsar☎️ Amri...
❤️Amritsar Escorts Service☎️9815674956☎️ Call Girl service in Amritsar☎️ Amri...
 
Pune Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Pune No💰Adva...
Pune Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Pune No💰Adva...Pune Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Pune No💰Adva...
Pune Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Pune No💰Adva...
 
Call Girl In Indore 📞9235973566📞 Just📲 Call Inaaya Indore Call Girls Service ...
Call Girl In Indore 📞9235973566📞 Just📲 Call Inaaya Indore Call Girls Service ...Call Girl In Indore 📞9235973566📞 Just📲 Call Inaaya Indore Call Girls Service ...
Call Girl In Indore 📞9235973566📞 Just📲 Call Inaaya Indore Call Girls Service ...
 
Low Cost Call Girls Bangalore {9179660964} ❤️VVIP NISHA Call Girls in Bangalo...
Low Cost Call Girls Bangalore {9179660964} ❤️VVIP NISHA Call Girls in Bangalo...Low Cost Call Girls Bangalore {9179660964} ❤️VVIP NISHA Call Girls in Bangalo...
Low Cost Call Girls Bangalore {9179660964} ❤️VVIP NISHA Call Girls in Bangalo...
 
Call Girls Mussoorie Just Call 8854095900 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Mussoorie Just Call 8854095900 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Mussoorie Just Call 8854095900 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Mussoorie Just Call 8854095900 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
7 steps How to prevent Thalassemia : Dr Sharda Jain & Vandana Gupta
7 steps How to prevent Thalassemia : Dr Sharda Jain & Vandana Gupta7 steps How to prevent Thalassemia : Dr Sharda Jain & Vandana Gupta
7 steps How to prevent Thalassemia : Dr Sharda Jain & Vandana Gupta
 
(RIYA)🎄Airhostess Call Girl Jaipur Call Now 8445551418 Premium Collection Of ...
(RIYA)🎄Airhostess Call Girl Jaipur Call Now 8445551418 Premium Collection Of ...(RIYA)🎄Airhostess Call Girl Jaipur Call Now 8445551418 Premium Collection Of ...
(RIYA)🎄Airhostess Call Girl Jaipur Call Now 8445551418 Premium Collection Of ...
 
Chennai ❣️ Call Girl 6378878445 Call Girls in Chennai Escort service book now
Chennai ❣️ Call Girl 6378878445 Call Girls in Chennai Escort service book nowChennai ❣️ Call Girl 6378878445 Call Girls in Chennai Escort service book now
Chennai ❣️ Call Girl 6378878445 Call Girls in Chennai Escort service book now
 
Independent Bangalore Call Girls (Adult Only) 💯Call Us 🔝 7304373326 🔝 💃 Escor...
Independent Bangalore Call Girls (Adult Only) 💯Call Us 🔝 7304373326 🔝 💃 Escor...Independent Bangalore Call Girls (Adult Only) 💯Call Us 🔝 7304373326 🔝 💃 Escor...
Independent Bangalore Call Girls (Adult Only) 💯Call Us 🔝 7304373326 🔝 💃 Escor...
 
💚Reliable Call Girls Chandigarh 💯Niamh 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girl In Chandigarh N...
💚Reliable Call Girls Chandigarh 💯Niamh 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girl In Chandigarh N...💚Reliable Call Girls Chandigarh 💯Niamh 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girl In Chandigarh N...
💚Reliable Call Girls Chandigarh 💯Niamh 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girl In Chandigarh N...
 
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...
 
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...
 
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room Delivery
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room DeliveryCall 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room Delivery
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room Delivery
 
💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...
💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...
💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...
 
❤️Call Girl Service In Chandigarh☎️9814379184☎️ Call Girl in Chandigarh☎️ Cha...
❤️Call Girl Service In Chandigarh☎️9814379184☎️ Call Girl in Chandigarh☎️ Cha...❤️Call Girl Service In Chandigarh☎️9814379184☎️ Call Girl in Chandigarh☎️ Cha...
❤️Call Girl Service In Chandigarh☎️9814379184☎️ Call Girl in Chandigarh☎️ Cha...
 
👉 Chennai Sexy Aunty’s WhatsApp Number 👉📞 7427069034 👉📞 Just📲 Call Ruhi Colle...
👉 Chennai Sexy Aunty’s WhatsApp Number 👉📞 7427069034 👉📞 Just📲 Call Ruhi Colle...👉 Chennai Sexy Aunty’s WhatsApp Number 👉📞 7427069034 👉📞 Just📲 Call Ruhi Colle...
👉 Chennai Sexy Aunty’s WhatsApp Number 👉📞 7427069034 👉📞 Just📲 Call Ruhi Colle...
 
Call Girls in Lucknow Just Call 👉👉8630512678 Top Class Call Girl Service Avai...
Call Girls in Lucknow Just Call 👉👉8630512678 Top Class Call Girl Service Avai...Call Girls in Lucknow Just Call 👉👉8630512678 Top Class Call Girl Service Avai...
Call Girls in Lucknow Just Call 👉👉8630512678 Top Class Call Girl Service Avai...
 
Call Girls Kathua Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kathua Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Kathua Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kathua Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...
💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...
💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...
 
💚Call Girls In Amritsar 💯Anvi 📲🔝8725944379🔝Amritsar Call Girl No💰Advance Cash...
💚Call Girls In Amritsar 💯Anvi 📲🔝8725944379🔝Amritsar Call Girl No💰Advance Cash...💚Call Girls In Amritsar 💯Anvi 📲🔝8725944379🔝Amritsar Call Girl No💰Advance Cash...
💚Call Girls In Amritsar 💯Anvi 📲🔝8725944379🔝Amritsar Call Girl No💰Advance Cash...
 

Evaluation of Red Cell Hemolysis in Packed Red Cells During Processing and Storage

  • 1. Evaluation of Red Cell Hemolysis in Packed Red Cells During Processing and Storage
  • 2. Original Article INTRODUCTION There is as yet no substitute for human blood and its components.Inrecentyearstheneedforstrictercontrolover the quality of blood and its products has been emphasised. One such quality indicator for stored red cell units is the extent of hemolysis. Hemolysis represents the breakdown or disruption of the integrity of the red blood cell membranes causing the release of haemoglobin. Hemolysis of red cell units occurs during preparation of components as well as during storage, issue and transport to the patient. Hemolysis in blood products is usually manifested by the presence of free haemoglobin in the red cell suspending media, such as plasma or additive solutions. Storage of red cells causes a progressive increase in hemolysis. The extent of hemolysis can be estimated by various techniques, visual assessment being the most common. Others include spectrophotometric assays, photometric method and microplate technique [1-4]. In spite of the increasing use of additive solutions for storage of red cells, some amount of hemolysis is inevitable. The extent of hemolysis, to some extent varies with the composition of the additive solution used.ADSOLcontains 50% more adenine and 150% more glucose in addition to 750 mg/dL of mannitol than does SAGM. The presence of leukocytes in the red cell units contribute significantly to an increase in red cell hemolysis during storage [5-7]. This is due to the release of various chemicals and enzymes, especially proteases from the leukocytes. For the same reason various leukocyte reduction filters are commercially available.The presence of mannitol in theADSOLmedium reduces hemolysis even in the presence of leukocyte proteases. The percentage hemolysis progressively increases with the day of storage, irrespective of which additive solution has been used and whether or not the units are leucoreduced. However, even on day 42nd of storage, free haemoglobin in any of the red cell units should not exceed the permissible level which is 0.8%, as per the Council of Europe guidelines [8] and 1% as per the US FDA guidelines [9]. 35 Apollo Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2010 EVALUATION OF RED CELL HEMOLYSIS IN PACKED RED CELLS DURING PROCESSING AND STORAGE R N Makroo*, Vimarsh Raina**, Aakanksha Bhatia***, Richa Gupta† , Abdul Majid‡ , Uday Kumar Thakur‡‡ and N L Rosamma†† *Director, **Senior Consultant, ***Research Fellow, †Post Graduate, ‡ MSc Trainee, ‡‡ Technologist (Quality), †† Senior Technologist, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi-110076, India. Correspondence to: Dr RN Makroo, Director, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi 110 076, India. E-mail: makroo@apollohospitals.com Introduction: Storage of red cells causes a progressive increase in hemolysis. Inspite of the use of additive solutions for storage and filters for leucoreduction some amount of hemolysis is still inevitable. The extent of hemolysis however should not exceed the permissible threshold for hemolysis even on the 42nd day of storage.Study design and Methods: Eighty units of packed red cells, 40 stored in SAGM post leucoreduction and 40 inADSOL without leucoreduction filters, were evaluated for plasma haemoglobin by HemoCue Plasma Haemoglobin analyzer on the day of collection and on the 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, 35th and 42nd days thereafter. The haemoglobin and haematocrit were also noted for all these units by the Beckman & Coulter analyzer. Percentage Hemolysis was then calculated. Observations: Hemolysis progressively increased with the storage period in all the stored red cell units (SAGM as well ADSOL). However, on day 42nd of storage, free haemoglobin in all the red cell units was within the permissible level (which is 0.8% according to the Council of Europe guidelines and 1% as per the US FDA guidelines. The mean percentage hemolysis was slightly higher in the SAGM containing bags with an integral leucoreduction filter as compared to the bags containingADSOL. However this difference was marginal and not statistically significant. Conclusion: Hemolysis of the red cells increases with storage. However, maximum hemolysis does not exceed the permissible limits at any time thereby indicating the effect of optimum processing and storage conditions on red cell hemolysis. Key words: Hemolysis, Leucoreduction, Additive solutions, Haematocrit.
  • 3. Apollo Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2010 36 Original Article RESULTS In the PRC units stored in SAGM, the least hemolysis was observed on the day of collection (Mean = 0.1%), and the maximum hemolysis was observed on the 42nd day of storage (Mean = 0.553%). Similarly, in the PRC units that were stored in ADSOL, an increase in the percentage hemolysis was observed from a mean of 0.087% on day 0 to 0.538% on the 42nd day (Tables 1&2). The maximum percentage hemolysis shown by any sample was 0.710% in SAGM and 0.697% in ADSOL. It was also noted that the mean percentage hemolysis on each evaluation was slightly higher in 3-4 log leoucoreduced PRC units stored in SAGM as compared to those stored in ADSOL (Fig.1). However, the difference was not statistically significant. None of the samples showed percentage hemolysis of more than 0.8%, which is the maximum acceptable limit of hemolysis as per the Council of Europe Guidelines. DISCUSSION RBC units are prepared predominantly as concentrates (packed red cells) re-suspended in additive solutions (SAGM / ADSOL) at our center. This prospective study was taken up to evaluate the extent of hemolysis during AIMS The aim of the study was to evaluate the extent of RBC hemolysis with storage and the effect of leucoreduction and composition of the additive solution on the same. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study on red cell hemolysis in packed red cells during processing and storage, was conducted at the Department of Transfusion Medicine, IndraprasthaApollo Hospitals, New Delhi, between May-October-2009. A total of 80 whole blood units were collected in CPD anticoagulant. After a holding period of at least 30 minutes, the components were separated from these blood units. Forty of the PRC units were stored in blood bags containing SAGM following 3 to 4 log leucoreduction via integral filters and 40 units were stored in ADSOL containing bags, without integral filters giving only 1 log leucoreduction. All the packed red cell units were evaluated for plasma haemoglobin by HemoCue plasma haemoglobin analyzer. The first sample was collected immediately after processing, which was considered as the ‘Day 0’ sample. Subsequently, all red cell units were stored under standard storage conditions at 2-6o C. Further evaluation was done 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, 35th and 42nd days of collection. The haemoglobin and haematocrit were also noted for all units each time by the Beckman & Coulter analyzer. Each time 10 mL of the sample was collected aseptically from the units and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes. A large drop of the supernatant was pipetted out on the slide and the Plasma/Low Hb cuvette was filled from the drop. This was then inserted into the Hemocue photometer and the results were recorded. The percentage hemolysis was calculated by measuring the total Hb content, haematocrit and supernatant Hb content of the PRC units using the following formula: Hemolysis = Plasma Hb × (1-Hct) × 100 B-Hb Hb- Haemoglobin Hct- Haematocrit B-Hb- Blood Haemoglobin The data collected from the study was tabulated & then statistically evaluated to produce the following results. Table 1. Hemolysis in SAGM containing bags Day after Minimum Maximum Mean collection hemolysis hemolysis 0 0.059% 0.139% 0.1% 7 0.130% 0.236% 0.175% 14 0.203% 0.332% 0.256% 21 0.254% 0.403% 0.330% 28 0.314% 0.517% 0.4% 35 0.407% 0.602% 0.475% 42 0.465% 0.710% 0.553% Table 2. Hemolysis inADSOL containing bags Day after Minimum Maximum Mean collection hemolysis hemolysis 0 0.05% 0.156% 0.087% 7 0.083% 0.296% 0.165% 14 0.149% 0.358% 0.248% 21 0.193% 0.481% 0.315% 28 0.260% 0.553% 0.391% 35 0.329% 0.625% 0.467% 42 0.414% 0.697% 0.538%
  • 4. Original Article 37 Apollo Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2010 storage of packed red cells using two different additive solutions, and the effect of leucoreduction on the same. It was observed that the percentage hemolysis progressively increases from day 0 to day 42 of storage both in bags containingADSOL (0.087 to 0.538) as well as SAGM (0.1 to 0.553) as additive solutions. It was also noted that the units that contained ADSOL as an additive solution showed slightly lower levels of hemolysis (maximum hemolysis being 0.697%) with respect to those containing SAGM (Maximum hemolysis being 0.710%), even though the later were provided with integral leucoreduction filters. However, none of the units showed hemolysis more than the permissible limits, even on the 42nd day. At our center, we strictly follow the standard processing and storage guidelines. This could account for the satisfactory results obtained in our study. Of the various methods that are available for the assessment of hemolysis the visual method is the simplest, however the result are often inaccurate, misleading and result in over estimation of hemolysis in red blood cells units [2]. In a study comparing spectrophotometric method and the photometric methods, Cardigan, et al demonstrated that both methods gave comparable results [10]. We in our study adopted the photometric method (HemoCue plasma haemoglobin analyzer) for assessment of hemolysis. Many authors in India as well as across the world have demonstrated that RBC hemolysis increases with the storage period of PRC [11,12]. In one such study Sawant, et al [11] evaluated plasma haemoglobin levels using the tetramethylbenzidiene (TMB) method on day 1, 7, 14, 21 and 28 of collection. The hemolysis in all the PRC units increased with the day of storage. These findings were in confirmation with those in our study. Besides this they also observed that hemolysis in units that were stored in SAGM was higher compared to the units stored in ADSOL. In another study, Zimmerman, et al [1] also observed slightly higher level of hemolysis in SAGM containing bags. They attributed this increase to the preparatory technique which they used (the PRP method). Other authors believe that this difference in the level of hemolysis between SAGM andADSOL containing bags is due to the difference in composition of the two additive solutions. ADSOL contains 50% more adenine and 150% more glucose in addition to 750 mg/dL of mannitol than does SAGM. Mannitol acts as a membrane stabilizer and dextrose is required for the metabolism of stored red cells [11]. This could also account for the lower levels of hemolysis inADSOLcontaining bags in our study. It has also been described by various authors that the presence of leukocytes in the red cell units contribute significantly to an increase in red cell hemolysis during storage, [7,10,11] and that prestorage filtration helps in reducing the extent of this hemolysis [13,14]. This is due to the release of various chemicals and enzymes, especially proteases from the leukocytes. For the same reason various leukocytes reduction filters are commercially available. On the other hand, there have been a few reports in literature showing an increase in hemolysis with the use of leucoreduction filters [15,16]. In our study the difference in the level of hemolysis was higher in SAGM bags (with leucoreduction filters) than in the corresponding ADSOL containing bags, but did not reach significance. CONCLUSION Hemolysis is a very important parameter for assessing the quality of stored RBC’s. On assessing the effect of duration of storage on red cell hemolysis, we concluded that there is a progressive increase in the percentage hemolysis with storage, irrespective of the additive solution used. However, the extent of hemolysis does not exceed the recommended limits at any time during storage thereby indicating efficacy of the processing and storage protocol followed at our center. Further, no significant difference was noted in the extent of hemolysis between 3 to 4 log leucoreduced PRC units stored in SAGM and the 1 log leucoreduced PRC units stored inADSOL. REFERENCES 1. Zimmermann R, Heidenreich D, Weisbach V, et al. In Fig.1. Comparison between SAGM and ADSOL
  • 5. Apollo Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2010 38 Original Article vitro quality control of red blood cell concentrates outdated in clinical practice. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique. 2003; 10: 275-283. 2. Janatpour KA, Paglieroni TG, Crocker VL, et al. Visual assessment of hemolysis in red cell units and segments can be deceptive. Transfusion 2004; 44: 984-989. 3. Cookson P, Sutherland J, Cardigan RA. Simple Spectrophotometric method for the quantification of residual haemoglobin in platelet concentrates. Vox Sanguinis 2004; 87: 264-271. 4. Seghatchian J, Krailadsiri P, Beard M, Vickers M. Development of a Microplate method for the measurement of plasma haemoglobin and its use in monitoring the storage lesion of red cell components. Transfus Apher Sci; 2002; 26: 91-93. 5. Greenwalt TJ, Zehner Sostock C, Dumaswala UJ. Studies in red blood cells preservation. Effect on the other formed elements .Vox Sang 1990; 58: 85-89. 6. Humbert JR, Fermin CD, Winser EL. Early damage to granulocytes during storage. Semin Hematol 1991; 28: 10-13. 7. Heaton WA, Holmes S, Smith K, et al. Effects of 3-5 logs 10 prestorage leukocytes depletion on red cell storage and metabolism. Br J Hematol 1994; 87: 363-368. 8. Guide to the preparation, use and quality assurance of blood components. Council of Europe Publishing. 6th ed. Strasbourg Cedex Germany, 2000. 9. FDA summary basis of approval of red blood cells frozen and red blood cells deglycerolized (reference no. 86- 0335). Applicant- Department of the Navy, Naval Hospital. Bethesda, MD, US License Number 635-10, 1986. 10. Cardigan R, Smith K. Evaluation HemoCue plasma hemoglobin analyzer for assessing hemolysis in Red cell concentrates during storage, Vox Sanguinis 2002; 82: 76-79. 11. Sawant RB, Jathar SK, Rajadhyaksha SB, Kadam PT. Red cell hemolysis during processing and storage, Asian Journal of Transfusion 2007; 1: 47-51. 12. Samuel O. Sowemimo-Coker: Red blood cell hemolysis during processing.Transfusion Medicine Reviews: 2002; 16 (1),46-60. 13. Rogers SE, Edmondson D, Goodrick MJ, et al. Prestorage white cell reduction in saline-adenine- glucose-mannitol red cells by use of an integral filter : evaluation of storage values and in vivo recovery. Transfusion 1995; 35:727-733. 14. Heaton WAL, Holme S, Smith K, et al. Effects of 3-5 log10 pre-storage leucocyte depletion on red cell storage and metabolism. Br.J.Hematol 1994; 87: 363-368. 15. Gammon RR, Strayer SA, Avery NL, Mintz PD. Hemolysis during leukocyte-reduction filtration of stored red blood cells. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2000; 30:195. 16. Muller-Steinhardt M, Janetzko K, Kandler R, et al. Impact of various red cell concentrate preparation methods on the efficiency of prestorage white cell filtration and on red cells during storage for 42 days. Transfusion 1997; 37: 1137-1142.