Call Now ☎9870417354|| Call Girls in Noida Sector 18 Escort Service Noida N.C.R.
Zyme Network Co Case Study
1. Case Study—Zyme TrueID
“Zyme’s TrueID solution
has replaced our manual
name-cleansing and
matching process with a
scalable, more accurate,
automated solution.”
—Manager, Sales Ops
NetworkCo
NetworkCo’s Goals
• Improve sales force utilization
by paying tier-based
commissions
• Improve channel marketing
through clearer visibility to
sales
• Increase accuracy of partner
rebates
Realized Benefits
• More accurate partner
rebates
• More effective channel
development due to better
information on partner sales
• Better sales force utilization
• More satisfied salespeople
• Fewer partner disputes
Company Background
NetworkCo®
, Inc. provides network security and data protection solutions that
enable customers around the world to operate their global networks securely
and scale them as necessary. NetworkCo’s solutions feature firewalls, as well as
value-added security subscriptions such as anti-virus, and intrusion prevention.
With solutions available for small and medium businesses as well as large
enterprises, channel partners are a critical element for NetworkCo’s success. The
company sells through a network of approximately 40,000 partners worldwide in
Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific.
Challenges
Partner Name Cleansing and Transaction Matching—Effective partner
marketing was a critical success factor in NetworkCo’s growth, and such marketing
relied heavily on visibility into top partners’ total worldwide sales. Yet as NetworkCo
grew, and partners and partner locations proliferated, it became more difficult to
accurately roll up total worldwide sales by partner. Different distributors reported
the same reseller names in different ways. The existing manual name cleansing
process made it easy for sales operations to miss the fact that “ABC Computers,
Inc” in Des Moines was the same partner as “ABC Comp.” in Miami. Matching
these reseller names to Salesforce Accounts was also a challenge. These process
challenges often resulted in inaccurate sales totals for partners. Dissatisfaction
rose among the sales force, whose commissions were based on sales totals, as
well as among partners, whose tier assignments were based on sales.
Partner Tier Assignments—The company had 40,000 partners in total, with tier
assignments as follows:
• 500 platinum partners
• 1,000 silver partners
• 2,000 bronze partners
• 36,500 additional registered partners
When NetworkCo decided to begin assigning commissions by tier, it became
obvious that the manual name-cleansing solution was not sustainable. To calculate
sales commissions accurately, it would be necessary to determine the partner’s
tier on each given transaction date, not just the current tier.
As a result of these challenges, NetworkCo had three primary goals:
• To match the “sold-to” party in sales transactions to a known Salesforce Account
• To enrich each transaction with the selling party’s “tier” as of that transaction
date, for the purpose of sales commissions and partner rebates
• To cleanse Salesforce Accounts and reduce duplicate and overlapping Accounts
Partner Name Cleansing and Transaction
Matching at NetworkCo