The document discusses various oil recovery techniques, focusing on waterflooding. It summarizes that waterflooding involves injecting water into reservoirs to increase pressure and displace oil towards production wells, potentially recovering up to 50% of oil originally in place. The document discusses factors in choosing between peripheral and pattern water injection schemes and describes various pattern designs, noting 5-spot and 7-spot patterns are commonly used.
1. Oil Recovery Techniques
Part of âAdvanced Waterfloodingâ Course
For Kuwait Oil Company (KOC), Kuwait
2022
1
Hesham Mokhtar Ali
Senior Reservoir Engineer
in/heshammokhtarali/
2. Drainage Cut-of fs
Sw eep
Pore scale
ef ficiency
Ab ility to
displace oil/gas
Capture of mobile
hydrocarbons b y w ells
C onnection of
w ells to oil/gas
Physical & commercial cons train ts
Eps Es
*
*
* Ed Ec
Areal Vert ica l Re servoir
e nergy
Facilitie s Commercia l
* * *
Rock /fl ui d type
Recov ery process
Compart ments W ell
type/spacing
Recovery proc ess;
Kv/Kh; Di p, Kx/Ky
Aqui fer influx;
i njection;
expansivity
WO R; G O R;
facilities desi gn
L icense terms;
export l imits
=
RF
Recovery Process:
waterflood, EOR
Well-work: Offtake
management by
zones, layers
The Recovery Process
Pore Scale Efficiency Drainage Sweep Efficiency Cut-offs
Recovery
Efficiency
⢠For the full system, the recovery efficiency can be very complicated.
⢠Therefore, the reservoir simulation introduces a significant tool for understanding reservoir dynamics
Drilling: Infill, Non-
Conventional Wells,
peripheral or in-field pools
Sustain Rate: Reservoir Energy
(Injection, Artificial Lift,
Compression), Facilities
upgrades
3. Recovery Techniques?
⢠Natural reservoir energy (primary
recovery)
⢠Improved recovery methods:
⢠Pressure maintenance (Gas
injection & Waterflooding)
⢠Thermal recovery
⢠Chemical flooding
â Mobility control by adding
polymers to reduce the mobility
of the injected water,
â Interfacial tension (IFT)
reduction by using surfactants,
and/or alkalis.
⢠Miscible flooding
4. Incremental Recovery
⢠A comparison of three methods:
â Surfactant-Polymer (SP)
flooding has the highest
recovery factor relative to
polymer and water flooding.
4
5. Oil Recovery Process
⢠Primary recovery:
â The production of
hydrocarbons under the
natural driving mechanisms
present in the reservoir.
⢠Secondary recovery:
â The additional recovery
resulting from the
conventional methods of
water injection and
immiscible gas injection.
Target for different crude oil systems
Oil recovery categories
6. Constant Pressure Displacement
⢠Advantages
â Control well placement
⢠Disadvantages
â Adequate water source required
â Water quality issues
â Compatibility with formation (e.g., clay swelling)
â CAPEX: facilities, source, wells, etc.
â OPEX: treatment, handling, fuel, etc.
⢠Advantages
â Pressure support
â Good sweep if gravity stable
â Fewer injection wells
â Gas âstorageâ for later use
⢠Disadvantages
â Gas source required
â Adverse viscosity ratio
â CAPEX & OPEX
Water Injection
Gas Injection
6
7. Typical Production Performance
⢠For many fields, especially smaller ones, the plateau phase can be very short, while large fields can stay
several decades at the plateau production level.
First Oil
Decline
Peak Oil Plateau
Prod. BU
Discovery
Abandonment (EUR)
Further Explorations
8. Maximizing The Asset Value
ďŽ Techniques to identify opportunities:
ďŽ Well interventions: acid jobs, squeezes, recompletions, re-fracturing jobs
ďŽ Wells to shut in or re-activate
ďŽ Improved waterflood management
ďŽ Goal: Improve production/recovery efficiency.
4
3
2
1
Payout time
Cumulative production
Extend field lifetime
Oilfield Development Operations
8
Waterflooding has a
significant rule for
increasing the UR.
9. Waterflooding?
⢠It is a secondary recovery technique of
increasing the oil production.
⢠Over time, the pressure in an oil reservoir slowly
and steadily decreases and as a result the
production rate decreases.
⢠Applications:
â Maintain Reservoir Pressure â Pressure
Maintenance
â Supplement Natural Water Influx
â Waterflood dominates processes
â Relatively low cost
â General availability of water
â Ease of application water injection
9
10. The Right Waterflooding
⢠It involves optimized design
for ALL project components:
â Water injectors (number,
spacing, locations, etc.)
â Water injected (quality,
compatibility, properties).
â Production wells (optimum
production rates, well
monitoring, performance
evaluation).
â Production data
(production rates, volume,
ratios)
10
Right Volume
Right Place
Right
Quality
Right
Time
11. How Does a Water Injection Work?
⢠Inject water on the peripherals on the reservoir.
⢠The injected water will displace/push oil towards
the producing wells for supporting reservoir
pressure.
⢠Waterflooding increases oil recovery by 2
mechanisms
⢠Pressure maintenance
⢠Displacement of oil by water
⢠Both processes are dynamic displacement processes.
Waterflooding: injection pattern displace oil with
water
⢠Use injector-producer patterns to sweep oil. FWL
Injectors Oil Producers
11
12. Value of Waterflooding
⢠Carbonate reservoir FDP
⢠Gulf of Suez, Egypt
⢠The anticipated production from capital
investment and work programs comprising
the various elements of this field
development plan (FDP).
⢠When properly managed, the WF may
recover up to 50% of OOIP.
12
13. Recovery Process Decision Tree
Pressure Maintenance
Reinject gas Gas or Water
Depletion Depletion/Gas
Drive
Gas Drive Aquifer Water Influx
Water Drive
Strong Aquifer
Peripheral WF
Pattern WF
Y
N
Y
N W
G
N
Y
N
Y
⢠Pressure Maintenance:
â Initiated when reservoir pressure is relatively high
â A dynamic displacement process
â The pressure and saturation history can have a significant impact on the recovery efficiency.
13
14. Combination Depletion & Displacement
⢠Depletion is often assisted by natural water drive
â Apply displacement, but with declining pressure
⢠Weak or dead aquifers are often supplemented with peripheral
water injection
â Apply displacement; pressure depends on voidage
replacement rates
Injection well
⢠Pattern flood
â Better pressure maintenance for low permeability
â More appropriate for low dip
â High rate when qcrit is low
⢠Downdip peripheral
â Fewer wells
â Better sweep when gravity stable
14
15. Waterflooding Development Options
⢠When making a choice
between:
â Peripheral water injection
(e.g. Injection wells drilled
near the original OWC)
â Pattern water injection
schemes.
⢠Controlling factors:
â Well injectivity
â Injector/producer ratio,
â Rate of throughput,
â Sweep efficiency
Peripheral 15
Water injection Waterflooding
Pattern
16. Waterflood Patterns
ďą Peripheral (at the edge or periphery of the reservoir)
⢠Advantages: Better areal sweep, increase displacement efficiency,
for partial water drive reservoir, delayed water Breakthrough
⢠Disadvantage: The response to the water injection is limited to the
producers, delayed field respond
⢠Uses: in smaller reservoirs or combination with pattern
ďą Pattern (irregular and regular repeating patterns)
⢠Advantages: Faster fill-up and pressurization, Faster field
response to flood, High sweep efficiency
⢠Disadvantage: High investment, Early water BT, Adverse MR
16
17. Peripheral vs. Pattern
⢠Peripheral (bottom up) flood may be preferable:
⢠Relatively thick reservoirs with good vertical communication
⢠Reservoirs with high dip
⢠Water injection near the original OWC
â Supplementation of peripheral injection with infield/pattern injectors may also be required in case of
⢠Relatively low permeability
⢠Significant lateral distance between injectors & producers (inadequate support at crestal
producers).
⢠Pattern water injection is best suited for
⢠Reservoirs with poor vertical communication (little advantage from oil/water gravity segregation).
â The optimal flood patterns (5-spot, 7-spot, 9-spot patterns, etc.) are a function of:
⢠Fault patterns
⢠Areal heterogeneity
⢠Reservoir anisotropy
⢠Mobility ratio
17
18. Water Injection vs. Flooding
Five - spot
Production well
Injection well
Future inj. well
Injectors
Producers
18
⢠As late as the mid-60âs,
waterfloods commonly
started as peripheral
floods.
⢠This works in fields with
high permeability but is
not a first choice in low-
permeability fields.
⢠Injector/producer patterns
sweep oil from injectors to
producers more
effectively as they
increase reservoir
pressure.
19. Waterflood Patterns
Direct Drive Staggered Drive
Injection
Well
Production
Well
No-flow
Boundary
⢠Direct Line Drive
⢠All wells line up in a
rectangular grid system.
⢠Staggered Line Drive
⢠Producers are shifted
1/2 pattern from
injectors.
⢠The staggered line drive
has better areal sweep
efficiency than the direct
line drive.
19
20. Waterflood Patterns
Injection well
Production
well
No-flow
boundary
ďˇ 1 : 1 injector-to-producer ratio
ďˇ Most common pattern used
in waterflooding
ďˇ Uniform well spacing
ďˇ High sweep efficiency
ďˇ Regular and inverted 5-spot
are identical
ďˇ Special case of a staggered
line drive with square drilling
pattern
20
5-Spot Pattern
23. In-Fill Patterns
⢠Reasons
⢠Reservoir complexity
⢠Lack of lateral pay continuity
⢠Unfavorable injection distribution
⢠Lack of injection support
⢠Actions
⢠Matured field - Uniform In-fill patterns
⢠New field - Peripheral waterflood
2
2
1
1
24. Ideal Waterflood Project
⢠Homogeneous and non-fractured reservoir
⢠Non-partitioned, isotropic (Kx = Ky), and continuous pay
⢠High porosity & permeability
⢠Low Kv/Kh ratio for flat structures
⢠No water-sensitive clays
⢠Water-wet rock
⢠High transmissibility between flanks and center (for peripheral injection scheme)
⢠Low oil viscosity
⢠Average reservoir pressure higher than bubble point pressure (no free gas saturation)
⢠Thick oil column with small oil-water transition zone
⢠Low initial water saturation in oil column
⢠Minimal gas saturation in oil column & No gas cap
⢠Availability of injection water (water source)
⢠Water-water compatibility
⢠On-shore location
24