SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 1
DEFENCES FOR
DEFAMATION
JUSTIFICATION (TRUTH)
1.The general rule is that
when a libel or slander
statement is proven to be
true in substance and in
fact, the law will not protect
the Plaintiff.
2. The burden is on the
Defendant to proof it is true
in substance and in fact.
3. The intention of D is
immaterial. Even if the D
had intended to cause
damage to P, D is not liable.
S. Pakianathan v Dr.
Jenmi Ibrahim
4. s. 8 Defamation Act
In case of libel and slander,
where there is more than
one allegations, a defence
of justification shall not fail
by reason of D cannot proof
all the allegation is to be
true.
Abd. Rahman v
Seenivasagam
FAIR COMMENT
It is a defence that the
statement is a fair comment on
a matter of public interest.
There are 4 requirements to this
defence
(1) The matter commented on
must be of public interest.
i.e commenting on
acts/activites of MP or of
influential people.
(2) It must be an expression
of opinion and not an
assertion of facts
Dakhyl v Labouchere
(3) The comment must be fair
(i)It must be true facts at the
time it was made and
cannot invent untrue facts
except statements made by a
person upon previlege occasion
i.e. witnesses in court case, or
parliamentary proceeding.(court
reporter can rely upon this
defence)
(ii)S. 8 DA failure to proof all
allegation is immaterial .
Fairness means D at the time it
was made was honest man
expressing his opinion. The test
is Objective test.
(4) The comment must not be
malicious
Malicious means evil
motive.Malicious comment
means there is no fair comment.
PRIVILEGE
There are two types of Privilege i.e. absolute
and qualified privilege.Improtant points is
occasion of statements.
(1) Absolute Privilege
A person defamed on an occasion of absolute
privilege has no legal redress. Following
situation where defence of absolute privilege
arise:
i) statements in Parliament
(ii)rports papers, votes ordered to be
published by both Houses
(iii)Judicial proceedings
(iv) communication made by an officer of a
state to another in the course of his duty
(v) fair and accurate newspaper and
broadcasting report of judicial proceedings.
(2) Qualified Privilege
A defamatory statement
Made with honest without malice although it is
untrue statement..If P can proof there is
malice on the part of D, he can claim damage.
Occassions of qualified Privilege:
(i) fair and accurate reports of parliamentary
proceeding
(ii) fair and accurate reports of judicial
proceeding
(iii) certain fair and accurate report published
in newspaper or broadcasting from a station in
Malaysia.
(iv) statement made from A to B about C in
which
• . A is under a legal moral or social duty to
communicate to B and B has
corresponding interest inreceiving it
(medical report)
• . when A has an interest to protected and
B is under a corresponding legal, moral
and social duty to protect that interest.
(infor police about neigb pushing drugs)
(v) Where A and B have common interest in
the statement.(head of dept.exchange reports)
(vi) statements in protection of oneself or
one`s property
(vii) statements made to the proper authorities
in order to procure redress of public
grievances.
APOLOGY
It is not a defence but a
mitigating factor to reduce
damages.
Apology in mitigating of
damages is provided u/s 10
DA.Defendant may raise in
court that he has made or
offered an apology to the P
before the commencement of
theaction or if the action was
commenced before there was
an opportunity of making or
offering such apology, as
soon afterwards as he had the
opportunity of doing so.
Datuk Patinggi Abd Rahman
Ya`kub v Abang Mohammad
Vincent Tan v Dato Hj
Hassan(only conditional
apology).It must full an
unconditional because the
purpose of apology is to
remove sting attack on P)
PAYING INTO COURT
D pays money to court
offering P the said sum as
compensation for the wrong
done.It isto reduce cost.
If P accept, the action
discontinue but if P insist, the
normal procedure till
judgement.
I D succeed, money will be
return to D
But if P succeed then :
(i)if the sum awarded is
greater the D muts pay the
balance and cost.
(ii)If sum is equal or less than
D is liable for cost only.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Law of defamation
Law of defamationLaw of defamation
Law of defamation
Jimi Kayode
 
Lecture 7 fatal offences
Lecture 7 fatal offencesLecture 7 fatal offences
Lecture 7 fatal offences
fatima d
 
Lecture 8 non fatal offences
Lecture 8 non fatal offencesLecture 8 non fatal offences
Lecture 8 non fatal offences
fatima d
 

Mais procurados (20)

Law of defamation
Law of defamationLaw of defamation
Law of defamation
 
Defamation Law in India
Defamation Law in IndiaDefamation Law in India
Defamation Law in India
 
Law of trots
Law of trotsLaw of trots
Law of trots
 
Lecture 7 fatal offences
Lecture 7 fatal offencesLecture 7 fatal offences
Lecture 7 fatal offences
 
conspiracy under torts
conspiracy under tortsconspiracy under torts
conspiracy under torts
 
Defamation
DefamationDefamation
Defamation
 
An introduction to law of torts
An introduction to law of tortsAn introduction to law of torts
An introduction to law of torts
 
Social media and defamation law (watermarked)
Social media and defamation law (watermarked) Social media and defamation law (watermarked)
Social media and defamation law (watermarked)
 
law of Tort
law of Tortlaw of Tort
law of Tort
 
Law of torts....updated.06.08.2015
Law of torts....updated.06.08.2015Law of torts....updated.06.08.2015
Law of torts....updated.06.08.2015
 
Defamation
DefamationDefamation
Defamation
 
Ch3 1 powerpoint Tort Law
Ch3 1 powerpoint Tort LawCh3 1 powerpoint Tort Law
Ch3 1 powerpoint Tort Law
 
Defamation
DefamationDefamation
Defamation
 
Lecture 8 non fatal offences
Lecture 8 non fatal offencesLecture 8 non fatal offences
Lecture 8 non fatal offences
 
Defamation ppt
Defamation pptDefamation ppt
Defamation ppt
 
Law of torts notes
Law of torts notesLaw of torts notes
Law of torts notes
 
ATTEMPT AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
ATTEMPT AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACYATTEMPT AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
ATTEMPT AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
 
offence of Abetment under indian peal code
offence of Abetment under indian peal code offence of Abetment under indian peal code
offence of Abetment under indian peal code
 
Torts defamation i
Torts defamation iTorts defamation i
Torts defamation i
 
ABETMENT
ABETMENTABETMENT
ABETMENT
 

Destaque (20)

Torts remoteness
Torts remotenessTorts remoteness
Torts remoteness
 
Torts causation of_facts
Torts causation of_factsTorts causation of_facts
Torts causation of_facts
 
Torts contributARY negligence
Torts contributARY negligenceTorts contributARY negligence
Torts contributARY negligence
 
Torts _fatal_accident_clai
Torts  _fatal_accident_claiTorts  _fatal_accident_clai
Torts _fatal_accident_clai
 
Torts _measure_of_damage
Torts  _measure_of_damageTorts  _measure_of_damage
Torts _measure_of_damage
 
Power of attorney
Power of attorney Power of attorney
Power of attorney
 
Torts duty of_care
Torts duty of_careTorts duty of_care
Torts duty of_care
 
Tracing 1_
Tracing  1_Tracing  1_
Tracing 1_
 
Torts _ola_1957
Torts  _ola_1957Torts  _ola_1957
Torts _ola_1957
 
Torts causation in_law
Torts causation in_lawTorts causation in_law
Torts causation in_law
 
Torts _strict_liability_
Torts  _strict_liability_Torts  _strict_liability_
Torts _strict_liability_
 
Torts damages
Torts damagesTorts damages
Torts damages
 
Torts contributory_neglige
Torts  contributory_negligeTorts  contributory_neglige
Torts contributory_neglige
 
Torts _res_ipsa_loquitor
Torts  _res_ipsa_loquitorTorts  _res_ipsa_loquitor
Torts _res_ipsa_loquitor
 
Torts damage to_property
Torts damage to_propertyTorts damage to_property
Torts damage to_property
 
740 1990
740 1990740 1990
740 1990
 
Subdivision, partition and amalgamation
Subdivision, partition and amalgamationSubdivision, partition and amalgamation
Subdivision, partition and amalgamation
 
Phyciatric injury
Phyciatric injuryPhyciatric injury
Phyciatric injury
 
Before action
Before actionBefore action
Before action
 
Torts _present_laws_on_ner
Torts  _present_laws_on_nerTorts  _present_laws_on_ner
Torts _present_laws_on_ner
 

Semelhante a Torts defamation iii

Legal aspects of ad col tambekar
Legal aspects of ad  col tambekarLegal aspects of ad  col tambekar
Legal aspects of ad col tambekar
Rbk Asr
 
The following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docx
The following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docxThe following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docx
The following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docx
oreo10
 
ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC v FAHAD (2014)
ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC v FAHAD (2014)ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC v FAHAD (2014)
ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC v FAHAD (2014)
Stephen Gilroy
 
Business Communication Legal Aspects
Business Communication Legal AspectsBusiness Communication Legal Aspects
Business Communication Legal Aspects
rehan012
 
Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]
Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]
Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]
internewsarmenia
 
SECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docx
SECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docxSECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docx
SECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docx
zenobiakeeney
 

Semelhante a Torts defamation iii (18)

Legal aspects of ad col tambekar
Legal aspects of ad  col tambekarLegal aspects of ad  col tambekar
Legal aspects of ad col tambekar
 
The following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docx
The following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docxThe following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docx
The following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docx
 
S chapter 4 defamation fall 2020the first amendment
S chapter 4 defamation fall 2020the first amendment S chapter 4 defamation fall 2020the first amendment
S chapter 4 defamation fall 2020the first amendment
 
ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC v FAHAD (2014)
ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC v FAHAD (2014)ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC v FAHAD (2014)
ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC v FAHAD (2014)
 
Economic Loss
Economic LossEconomic Loss
Economic Loss
 
Defamation and its types - law of torts seminar ppt
Defamation and its types - law of torts seminar pptDefamation and its types - law of torts seminar ppt
Defamation and its types - law of torts seminar ppt
 
Presentation on law and misperception
Presentation on law and misperceptionPresentation on law and misperception
Presentation on law and misperception
 
defamation.pptx
defamation.pptxdefamation.pptx
defamation.pptx
 
Criminal defamation
Criminal defamationCriminal defamation
Criminal defamation
 
LWZ115 Legal Process.docx
LWZ115 Legal Process.docxLWZ115 Legal Process.docx
LWZ115 Legal Process.docx
 
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF TORTS
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF TORTSLLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF TORTS
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF TORTS
 
Business Communication Legal Aspects
Business Communication Legal AspectsBusiness Communication Legal Aspects
Business Communication Legal Aspects
 
Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]
Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]
Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]
 
SECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docx
SECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docxSECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docx
SECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docx
 
Law of Torts PPT for Students.pptx
Law of Torts PPT for Students.pptxLaw of Torts PPT for Students.pptx
Law of Torts PPT for Students.pptx
 
HEARSAY-EVIDENCE POWERPOINT FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES
HEARSAY-EVIDENCE POWERPOINT FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSESHEARSAY-EVIDENCE POWERPOINT FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES
HEARSAY-EVIDENCE POWERPOINT FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES
 
pdc SUBJECt unit 1.pdf
pdc SUBJECt unit 1.pdfpdc SUBJECt unit 1.pdf
pdc SUBJECt unit 1.pdf
 
Civil Law
Civil LawCivil Law
Civil Law
 

Mais de FAROUQ (12)

Mahan Sea Power
Mahan Sea PowerMahan Sea Power
Mahan Sea Power
 
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA(BIDANGKUASA TERUS) 1976
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA(BIDANGKUASA TERUS) 1976PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA(BIDANGKUASA TERUS) 1976
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA(BIDANGKUASA TERUS) 1976
 
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA (BIDANGKUASA TERUS) 1976
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA (BIDANGKUASA TERUS) 1976PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA (BIDANGKUASA TERUS) 1976
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA (BIDANGKUASA TERUS) 1976
 
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (PENJARAAN DAN TAHANAN) 1976
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (PENJARAAN DAN TAHANAN) 1976KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (PENJARAAN DAN TAHANAN) 1976
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (PENJARAAN DAN TAHANAN) 1976
 
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (MAHKAMAH TENTERA) 1976
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (MAHKAMAH TENTERA) 1976KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (MAHKAMAH TENTERA) 1976
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (MAHKAMAH TENTERA) 1976
 
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA(HUKUMAN MEDAN) 1976
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA(HUKUMAN MEDAN) 1976PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA(HUKUMAN MEDAN) 1976
PERATURAN-PERATURAN ANGKATAN TENTERA(HUKUMAN MEDAN) 1976
 
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (LEMBAGA SIASATAN) 1976
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (LEMBAGA SIASATAN) 1976KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (LEMBAGA SIASATAN) 1976
KAEDAH-KAEDAH ANGKATAN TENTERA (LEMBAGA SIASATAN) 1976
 
Torts cases and_material
Torts cases and_materialTorts cases and_material
Torts cases and_material
 
Torts defence_strict_liability
Torts  defence_strict_liabilityTorts  defence_strict_liability
Torts defence_strict_liability
 
Torts _occupiers_liability
Torts  _occupiers_liabilityTorts  _occupiers_liability
Torts _occupiers_liability
 
Torts _nuisance_ii
Torts  _nuisance_iiTorts  _nuisance_ii
Torts _nuisance_ii
 
Torts _nuisance_i
Torts  _nuisance_iTorts  _nuisance_i
Torts _nuisance_i
 

Último

Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MollyBrown86
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
PoojaGadiya1
 
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
ShashankKumar441258
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 

Último (20)

Performance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationPerformance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
 
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURYA SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
 
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptxIBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
 
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsCAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
 
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueAndrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
 
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdfBPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
 
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfRelationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
 
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxMunicipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
 
Jim Eiberger Redacted Copy Of Tenant Lease.pdf
Jim Eiberger Redacted Copy Of Tenant Lease.pdfJim Eiberger Redacted Copy Of Tenant Lease.pdf
Jim Eiberger Redacted Copy Of Tenant Lease.pdf
 
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
 
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd .pdf
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd         .pdfHely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd         .pdf
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd .pdf
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
 

Torts defamation iii

  • 1. DEFENCES FOR DEFAMATION JUSTIFICATION (TRUTH) 1.The general rule is that when a libel or slander statement is proven to be true in substance and in fact, the law will not protect the Plaintiff. 2. The burden is on the Defendant to proof it is true in substance and in fact. 3. The intention of D is immaterial. Even if the D had intended to cause damage to P, D is not liable. S. Pakianathan v Dr. Jenmi Ibrahim 4. s. 8 Defamation Act In case of libel and slander, where there is more than one allegations, a defence of justification shall not fail by reason of D cannot proof all the allegation is to be true. Abd. Rahman v Seenivasagam FAIR COMMENT It is a defence that the statement is a fair comment on a matter of public interest. There are 4 requirements to this defence (1) The matter commented on must be of public interest. i.e commenting on acts/activites of MP or of influential people. (2) It must be an expression of opinion and not an assertion of facts Dakhyl v Labouchere (3) The comment must be fair (i)It must be true facts at the time it was made and cannot invent untrue facts except statements made by a person upon previlege occasion i.e. witnesses in court case, or parliamentary proceeding.(court reporter can rely upon this defence) (ii)S. 8 DA failure to proof all allegation is immaterial . Fairness means D at the time it was made was honest man expressing his opinion. The test is Objective test. (4) The comment must not be malicious Malicious means evil motive.Malicious comment means there is no fair comment. PRIVILEGE There are two types of Privilege i.e. absolute and qualified privilege.Improtant points is occasion of statements. (1) Absolute Privilege A person defamed on an occasion of absolute privilege has no legal redress. Following situation where defence of absolute privilege arise: i) statements in Parliament (ii)rports papers, votes ordered to be published by both Houses (iii)Judicial proceedings (iv) communication made by an officer of a state to another in the course of his duty (v) fair and accurate newspaper and broadcasting report of judicial proceedings. (2) Qualified Privilege A defamatory statement Made with honest without malice although it is untrue statement..If P can proof there is malice on the part of D, he can claim damage. Occassions of qualified Privilege: (i) fair and accurate reports of parliamentary proceeding (ii) fair and accurate reports of judicial proceeding (iii) certain fair and accurate report published in newspaper or broadcasting from a station in Malaysia. (iv) statement made from A to B about C in which • . A is under a legal moral or social duty to communicate to B and B has corresponding interest inreceiving it (medical report) • . when A has an interest to protected and B is under a corresponding legal, moral and social duty to protect that interest. (infor police about neigb pushing drugs) (v) Where A and B have common interest in the statement.(head of dept.exchange reports) (vi) statements in protection of oneself or one`s property (vii) statements made to the proper authorities in order to procure redress of public grievances. APOLOGY It is not a defence but a mitigating factor to reduce damages. Apology in mitigating of damages is provided u/s 10 DA.Defendant may raise in court that he has made or offered an apology to the P before the commencement of theaction or if the action was commenced before there was an opportunity of making or offering such apology, as soon afterwards as he had the opportunity of doing so. Datuk Patinggi Abd Rahman Ya`kub v Abang Mohammad Vincent Tan v Dato Hj Hassan(only conditional apology).It must full an unconditional because the purpose of apology is to remove sting attack on P) PAYING INTO COURT D pays money to court offering P the said sum as compensation for the wrong done.It isto reduce cost. If P accept, the action discontinue but if P insist, the normal procedure till judgement. I D succeed, money will be return to D But if P succeed then : (i)if the sum awarded is greater the D muts pay the balance and cost. (ii)If sum is equal or less than D is liable for cost only.