Measure for Measure: Boston-based Technical Toolkits for Measuring Walkability, Livability, Accessibility, and Environmental Justice
•
1 gostou•652 visualizações
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Mais procurados (20)
Semelhante a Measure for Measure: Boston-based Technical Toolkits for Measuring Walkability, Livability, Accessibility, and Environmental Justice
Semelhante a Measure for Measure: Boston-based Technical Toolkits for Measuring Walkability, Livability, Accessibility, and Environmental Justice (20)
Mais de American Planning Association - Massachusetts Chapter
Mais de American Planning Association - Massachusetts Chapter (20)
Último
Último (20)
Measure for Measure: Boston-based Technical Toolkits for Measuring Walkability, Livability, Accessibility, and Environmental Justice
- 1. Measure for Measure: Boston-Based Technical Toolkits for Measuring Walkability, Livability, Accessibility and Environmental Justice Sean Pfalzer, Boston Region MPO Bruce Kaplan, Boston Region MPO Caroline Ducas, Parsons Brinckerhoff
- 2. Livability Indicators Database October 21, 2011 SNEAPA Conference Providence, RI Sean Pfalzer Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
- 5. Livable Places across Community Types Regional Urban Center Downtown Salem Inner Core Coolidge Corner, Brookline Maturing Suburb Minuteman Trail, Lexington Developing Suburb Commuter Rail Station, Ipswich
- 9. Automobile Ownership per Household
- 10. Daily Vehicle-Miles Traveled per Household
- 14. Miles of Bicycle Accommodations
- 15. Indicators of Livability across Community Types Community Type Community Population Density Employment Density Sidewalk Coverage Bicycle Coverage Autos per HH Daily VMT per HH Inner Core Somerville 18,436 5,027 90% 3.5% 1.1 29 Melrose 5,690 1,349 70% 0.9% 1.5 44 Regional Urban Center Salem 5,091 2,290 77% 2.2% 1.3 36 Framingham 2,583 1,761 49% 3.0% 1.7 53 Maturing Suburb Stoneham 3,492 1,274 58% 1.7% 1.7 49 Burlington 2,115 3,181 22% 0.0% 2.1 64 Developing Suburb Hudson 1,703 862 45% 2.1% 2.0 66 Bellingham 859 294 32% 2.2% 2.2 80
- 20. Measuring Environmental Justice October 21, 2011 SNEAPA Conference Providence, RI Bruce L. Kaplan, AICP Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
- 26. Recent Application by Boston Region MPO : Green Line Extension EA
- 30. Transit Accessibility to Jobs Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 31. Highway Accessibility to Jobs Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 32. Transit Accessibility to Services Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 33. Highway Accessibility to Services Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 34. Changes in Mobility Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 35. Changes in Congestion and Air Quality Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 37. Disability TAZs
- 38. Transit Accessibility to Jobs Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 39. Highway Accessibility to Jobs Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 40. Transit Accessibility to Services Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 41. Highway Accessibility to Services Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 42. Changes in Mobility Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 43. Changes in Congestion and Air Quality Using Unweighted Total Travel Times
- 50. Measuring Livability Benefits through Accessibility-Based Modeling October 21, 2011 SNEAPA Conference Caroline Ducas, EIT, Transportation Engineer & Planner
- 57. Context: MBTA Green Line Extension
- 58. Context: MBTA Green Line Extension
- 65. Example of Gravity Function : Access to Employment
- 66. Isochrone Employment Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index
- 67. Gravity Employment Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index
- 68. Isochrone Shopping Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index
- 69. Gravity Shopping Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index
- 70. Isochrone Health Care Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index
- 71. Gravity Health Care Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index
- 72. Isochrone Recreation Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index
- 73. Gravity Recreation Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index
- 74. Isochrone Education Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index Tufts Tufts
- 75. Isochrone Education Accessibility: Isochrone time threshold increased by 10 minutes No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index Tufts Tufts
- 76. Gravity Education Accessibility No-build Scenario Build Scenario LEGEND Accessibility Index Tufts Tufts
Notas do Editor
- Would be good for “Bicycle coverage” to have word(s) added that would refer to the type(s) of bicycle facilities being referred to. “Bicycle travel coverage (miles of facilities)”?
- In presenting, make sure to make clear right away that each dot represents an individual Boston-region municipality (or neighborhood of the inner core?)
- Before now you’ve been listing the four community types in the order that’s the reverse of this order.
- Be sure to talk about why more cities near the beginning of the alphabet have been doing it.
- I advocate lower-casing the names of the two types of TAZ, though this instance isn’t quite as bad as in the earlier instance of caps.
- Capitalizing “Disability” and “Burden”: I strongly believe that this gives a very bad impression.
- Change “to” to “of” I’ve e-mailed Karl about including CTPS.
- Though I’m not familiar with the terms in the last two bullets, I highly doubt they should be capitalized. Like “intelligent transportation systems” shouldn’t be.
- Route not Routes Station not Stations