This document discusses disadvantages of the status quo and advantages of a government plan. It notes harms of the status quo, how the plan addresses solvency issues, and uniqueness of advantages. It examines impacts of keeping kids in the classroom rather than recess, including risks of obesity, diabetes, and death for children. It evaluates the severity, timeline, and probability of these impacts occurring and asserts they are inevitable without changes. It also provides arguments for the government plan by stating the world will change negatively without the plan and that the plan does not create the impacts asserted by opponents.

1. DISADVANTAGES

2. DISADVANTAGES STOCK ISSUES Harms Plan Solvency Advantages

5. Link

7. UNIQUENESS What is good with the Status Quo Opposite of harms

8. UNIQUENESS What is good with the Status Quo Opposite of harms Children have recess in Status Quo

9. LINK How the Gov. plan changes the SQ

10. LINK How the Gov. plan changes the SQ Gov. plan keeps kids in classroom

11. IMPACTS (MPX) Why we care

12. IMPACTS (MPX) Why we care Compare to Gov. advantages

13. IMPACTS (MPX) Why we care Compare to Gov. advantages Children get fat

14. IMPACTS (MPX) Why we care Compare to Gov. advantages Children get fat and get diabetes

15. IMPACTS (MPX) Why we care Compare to Gov. advantages Children get fat and get diabetes and die

16. IMPACT CALCULUS Severity – how bad?

17. IMPACT CALCULUS Severity – how bad? Timeline – when?

18. IMPACT CALCULUS Severity – how bad? Timeline – when? Probability – how likely?

19. IMPACT CALCULUS Severity – how bad? Timeline – when? Probability – how likely? STP

20. IMPACT CALCULUS Severity – how bad? Timeline – when? Probability – how likely? STP

21. IMPACT CALCULUS Severity – how bad? Children will die Timeline – when? Probability – how likely? STP

22. IMPACT CALCULUS Severity – how bad? Children will die Timeline – when? Within 6 months to a year Probability – how likely? STP

23. IMPACT CALCULUS Severity – how bad? Children will die Timeline – when? Within 6 months to a year Probability – how likely? Without other fixes - inevitable STP

24. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE Non-Unique (government answer)

25. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE Non-Unique (government answer) The world is not actually good in the manner described

26. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE Non-Unique (government answer) The world is not actually good in the manner described Brink – the world is bound to change for the bad even without Government plan.

27. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE Does not Link (government answer)

28. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE Does not Link (government answer)

29. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE Does not Link (government answer) The government plan does not create the change that the opposition asserts

30. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE MPX (government answer) No link = no mpx

31. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE MPX (government answer) No link = no mpx Compare our advantages – case outweigh

32. ANSWERING DISADVANTAGE MPX (government answer) No link = no mpx Compare our advantages – case outweigh Impact Calculus (STP) Severity Timeline Probability