SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 11
Baixar para ler offline
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Prescription Opioid Use among Adults with Mental
Health Disorders in the United States
Matthew A. Davis, MPH, PhD, Lewei A. Lin, MD, Haiyin Liu, MA, and
Brian D. Sites, MD, MS
Background: The extent to which adults with mental health disorders in the United States receive opi-
oids has not been adequately reported.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of the noninsti-
tutionalized U.S. adult population from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We examined the rela-
tionship between mental health (mood and anxiety) disorders and prescription opioid use (defined as
receiving at least 2 prescriptions in a calendar year).
Results: We estimate that among the 38.6 million Americans with mental health disorders, 18.7%
(7.2 million of 38.6 million) use prescription opioids. Adults with mental health conditions receive
51.4% (60 million of 115 million prescriptions) of the total opioid prescriptions distributed in the
United States each year. Compared with adults without mental health disorders, adults with mental
health disorders were significantly more likely to use opioids (18.7% vs 5.0%; P < .001). In adjusted
analyses, having a mental health disorder was associated with prescription opioid use overall (odds
ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.83–2.35).
Conclusions: The 16% of Americans who have mental health disorders receive over half of all opi-
oids prescribed in the United States. Improving pain management among this population is critical to
reduce national dependency on opioids. (J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:000–000.)
Keywords: Analgesics, Opioid, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-sectional Studies, Mental Health, Opioid-Related Disor-
ders, Pain Management, Prescriptions, Surveys and Questionnaires
The United States is in the midst of an epidemic of
morbidity and mortality due to prescription opioid
use.1
Over the past 15 years the number of pre-
scription opioid analgesic medications sold in the
United States has quadrupled, yet the amount of
pain or disability that Americans experience has
remained unchanged.2
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention reports that from 2000 to
2014, more than 165,000 people have died from
overdoses related to prescription opioid use.2
The
identification of specific populations that rely heav-
ily on opioids is of strategic importance for risk
mitigation efforts. For instance, attention has fo-
cused on patients recovering from trauma and sur-
gery, among whom poor coping strategies were
associated with long-term reliance on opioids.3,4
Previous studies suggest that adults with mental
health disorders (ie, mood and anxiety disorders)
are more likely to be prescribed opioids and remain
taking them long-term.5–8
For example, adults with
mood disorders are nearly twice as likely to use
opioids long-term for pain.8
In fact, pain is very
common among adults with mental health disor-
ders,9,10
and the relationship between mental ill-
ness and opioid use is complex. However, some
suggest that mental illness may be a moderator in
the relationship between pain and opioid use.5
De-
spite the increase in the prevalence of mental health
disorders11
and the importance of tracking use of
prescription opioids nationally, the extent to which
This article was externally peer reviewed.
Submitted 2 March 2017; revised 6 March 2017; accepted
10 March 2017.
From the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation
(MAD), the School of Nursing (MAD, HL), the Institute for
Social Research (MAD), and the Addiction Center, Depart-
ment of Psychiatry (LAL), University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor; and the Department of Anesthesiology, Geisel
School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
(BDS).
Funding: none.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Corresponding author: Matthew A. Davis, MPH, PhD,
University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls, Room 4347, Ann
Arbor, MI 48109 ͑E-mail: mattadav@umich.edu).
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 1
PLEASE NOTE: Embargo deadline: Monday, June 26, 2017
U.S. adults with mental health disorders use pre-
scription opioids has not been thoroughly exam-
ined. Furthermore, identification of the specific
factors that may underpin the association would
help clarify the complex relationship between men-
tal health and pain.
Therefore, we used the nationally representative
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to ex-
amine the relationship between mental health dis-
orders and prescription opioid use. Because anxiety
and depression are the predominate mental health
disorders among adults in the United States,11
we
focused our attention on these 2 conditions. Our
objective was to derive national estimates of opioid
use among Americans with mental health disorders
and to examine factors associated with such use.
Methods
We performed a cross-sectional study using nation-
ally representative data from the MEPS, a survey of
the U.S. noninstitutionalized population that is
conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality that gathers extensive information on
health care utilization (including prescription med-
ications), expenditures, and health status.12
The
survey uses an overlapping panel design consisting
of a household component, a medical provider
component, and an insurance provider component.
To avoid potential recall bias, participants are sur-
veyed about past health and health care use at
6-month intervals. Personal and family-level data
obtained from the household, medical provider,
and insurance provider components are aggregated
by the MEPS study team. For this study we used
data from the MEPS household component files,
including the full-year consolidated, medical con-
dition, and prescription medication files. Because
our study used only publically available and deiden-
tified data, it was granted an exemption from insti-
tutional board review.
Study Sample
To increase the sample size in order to generate
more stable national estimates for subgroups, we
appended 2011 and 2013 MEPS data. These survey
years were chosen because they were the most re-
cently available at the time of analysis and ensured
an adequate sample size. We excluded 2012 data
because of duplication of participants due to the
overlapping panel design (ie, aggregation of MEPS
surveys in adjacent years would result in noninde-
pendence of study participants). A total of 52,000
adults (aged Ն18 years) participated in MEPS in
these 2 years (25,465 in 2011 and 26,535 in 2013).
After ineligible respondents were removed, such as
those who were institutionalized for a period of
time during the study, our final analytic sample
consisted of 51,891 adults.
Measures
Identification of Adults with Mental Health Disorders
Each MEPS participant is asked to identify any
health conditions in 6-month time periods. For
those who have a self-reported health condition,
trained MEPS staff code conditions using the In-
ternational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revi-
sion, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. A
special feature of the MEPS is that the health care
providers and facilities provide data on MEPS par-
ticipants’ health care use; such data are then cross-
referenced with survey responses from the partici-
pant. Thus, if a person with a mental health
disorder did not self-report having the condition,
they would still be identified if they had a clinical
diagnosis.
Based on the combination of self-report and
administrative clinical data, we identified partici-
pants who had a mental health disorder. To do so
we used ICD-9-CM codes truncated to the first 3
digits, including 300 (Anxiety, dissociative and so-
matoform disorders), 311 (Depressive disorder),
and 296 (Episodic mood disorders), to identify
adult MEPS participants with mental health disor-
ders13
(Appendix Table 1).
Prescription Opioid Use
The MEPS collects detailed data on prescription
medications using a unique combination of partic-
ipant self-report and administrative data obtained
from pharmacies. MEPS participants are asked to
supply the name of any prescribed medications and
the name and location of the pharmacy where they
obtained the prescription. Participants provide
written permission for the release of pharmacy re-
cords. Pharmacies are contacted to obtain records,
which detail the date filled, the National Drug
Code, medication name, strength of the medication
(amount and unit), quantity (package size), and pay-
ments by source. To identify meaningful classes of
drugs, National Drug Codes are merged to the
comprehensive Multum Lexicon crosswalk.14
We
2 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
used the Multum drug classes for oral “Narcotic
analgesics” and “Narcotic analgesics combinations”
in order to identify oral prescription opioid medi-
cations. In the MEPS prescription medication data,
the most common oral opioid prescriptions—
which account for approximately 65% of all opioid
prescriptions—include hydrocodone with acet-
aminophen, tramadol, hydrocodone with acetamin-
ophen, and hydrocodone. Our study was focused
on examining the likelihood of receiving prescrip-
tion opioid medications rather than chronic use;
thus we operationally defined an opioid user as an
adult who filled Ն2 prescription medications in the
calendar year.
To explore the clinical diagnoses associated with
prescription opioids, we also examined the top 10
clinical diagnoses for which opioids were pre-
scribed. To collapse ICD-9-CM codes into rele-
vant clinical disorders, the MEPS uses the Clinical
Classification Software developed by the Health-
care Cost and Utilization Project.15
Covariates
We extracted a variety of health measures to be
used as covariates (Appendix Table 2). The MEPS
administers the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-
12) to participants.16
From these data, we calcu-
lated the mean physical component summary
(PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)
scores of the SF-12 (PCS and MCS scores range
from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the highest level
of health). We examined several items of the SF-12
separately as well. We collapsed self-reported
health status17
into “excellent, very good, or good”
versus “fair or poor.” Because pain is the primary
driver of prescription opioid use, we examined the
SF-12 item on pain. The item inquires, “During
the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with
your normal work (including work outside the
home and housework)?” We collapsed the response
set into none or little (“not at all” or “a little bit”),
moderate (“moderately”) or severe (“quite a bit” or
“extremely”). Based on a combination of measures
of both physical and cognitive limitations, we also
calculated the percentage of participants with “any
functional limitation,” “physical limitation,” “social
limitation,” and “cognitive limitation.” We also
identified those who were smokers (current vs
never or former). Last, based on all medical condi-
tions (ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes reported in the
medical condition files) we generated a comorbid-
ity score. To do so, we applied a modified version
of the Charlson Comorbidity Index18
developed by
D’Hoore et al.19
We used ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes 303 (Alco-
hol dependence syndrome), 304 (Drug depen-
dence), and 305 (Nondependent abuse of drugs) to
identify study participants with substance abuse
disorders. The MEPS inquires about cancer diag-
noses; we used these items to identify participants
who had cancer. We also identified participants
with musculoskeletal conditions using a previously
applied approach.20
From the MEPS annual consolidated files, we ex-
tracted sociodemographic data for participants in our
study, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital sta-
tus, level of education, and health insurance coverage.
Age was collapsed into relevant age categories, in-
cluding young adult (18–44 years), middle-aged adult
(45–64 years), and older adult (Ն65 years). We also
identified those adults who underwent an outpatient
surgery, underwent surgery during an inpatient ad-
mission, or visited an emergency department specifi-
cally related to a physical injury.
Statistical Analyses
Our primary analyses examined the relationship
between having a mental health disorder and the
likelihood of prescription opioid use. We used sim-
ple descriptive measures to examine differences be-
tween adults with mental health disorders and
those without, restricted to those with specific
characteristics (eg, a cancer diagnosis, those self-
reporting having severe pain, etc.). The ␹2
test was
used to compare proportions and an independent t
test was used to compare means. A 2-sided P value
Ͻ.05 was considered statistically significant.
We used logit models to examine the relation-
ship while adjusting for differences, and coefficients
from our models were exponentiated to express
associations in the form of odds ratios. Covariates
in our model included age (continuous), sex, race/
ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black,
Hispanic, other), health insurance coverage (pri-
vate, public, uninsured), having a usual source of
care, self-reported limitation due to pain (little/
none, moderate, severe), PCS score (continuous),
physical limitation, substance use disorder diagno-
sis, outpatient surgery use, and inpatient surgery
use. Because our operational definition of an opioid
user was based on receiving 2 or more prescriptions
in the calendar year, we also performed a sensitivity
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 3
analysis in which we varied our definition to in-
clude between 1 and 5 prescriptions and then re-
examined associations.
For all analyses we used complex survey design
methods to make national estimates, which account
for a participant’s probability of selection and sam-
pling methodology. Because our study aggregated
2011 and 2013 MEPS data, survey weights were
adjusted so that the data represented a single cal-
endar year. Analyses were based on complete case
analysis, and we assumed any missing values to be
missing completely at random. Analyses were con-
ducted using Stata MP, version 14.0 (StataCorp,
College Station, TX).
Results
Among the 239.4 million U.S. adults, we estimate
that 38.6 million had a mental health disorder (Ta-
ble 1 and Figure 1). Of the adults with mental
health disorders, 18.7% were opioid users, com-
pared with only 5.0% among those without mental
health disorders (P Ͻ.001) (Figure 2). We estimate
that approximately 115 million opioid prescriptions
are distributed each year in the United States,
51.4% (60 million prescriptions) of which are re-
ceived by adults who have a mental health disorder.
Characteristics of Adults with a Mental Health
Disorder Who Use Opioids
Among adults with mental health disorders, opioid
users differed in several ways. Opioid users were
older (nearly 75% of opioid users were aged Ն45
years compared with 60% among nonopioid users),
more likely to be non-Hispanic white, and com-
pleted less educational (P Ͻ .001 for all) (Table 1).
Comparing opioid users with and without a mental
health disorder, those with a mental health disorder
were more likely to be middle-aged, female, non-
Hispanic white, and divorced, separated, or wid-
owed.
Among adults with mental health disorders, opi-
oid users were considerably less healthy than non-
opioid users (Table 1 and Appendix Table 2). The
mean PCS score was 33.5 (standard error, 0.50)
among opioid users versus 47.7 (standard error,
0.20) among nonopioid users (P Ͻ .001). Likewise,
among adults with mental health disorders, opioid
users had considerably more comorbidities; for in-
stance, 18.1% of opioid users had Ն3 comorbidi-
ties, compared with just 6.3% among nonopioid
users. Adults with mental health disorders who use
opioids also had much higher self-reported pain
levels (eg, 60.0% of opioid users reported severe
pain compared with only 16.2% among nonopioid
users). Among opioid users, those with mental
health disorders were less healthy than those with-
out mental health disorders, but the differences
were less pronounced.
Opioid Use Among Adults with Mental Health
Disorders
Among specific subpopulations based on the level
of self-reported pain, cancer diagnosis, and muscu-
loskeletal conditions, the higher percentage of opi-
oid users persisted among adults with mental health
conditions compared with those without (P Ͻ .001
for all) (Figure 2). Most notable was nearly twice
the percentage of opioid users among adults with
severe pain (45.3% of adults with mental health
disorders were opioid users compared with 24.1%
among those without mental health disorders).
The top 10 clinical diagnoses associated with
prescription opioids for Americans with mental
health disorders included musculoskeletal disor-
ders, poorly defined conditions, or an otherwise
missing diagnosis (Figure 3). The top 10 clinical
diagnoses we identified among adults with mental
health disorders account for 54.0% of the total
opioids prescribed to this population, suggesting
considerable variation in clinical diagnosis.
Association Between Mental Health Disorders and
Opioid Use
In unadjusted analyses the odds of opioid use was
Ͼ4 times higher among adults with mental health
disorders than among those without (odds ratio
[OR], 4.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.93–
4.77) (Table 2). After adjusting for sociodemo-
graphic characteristics, health status, and use of
selected health services, although attenuated, the
association persisted: adults with mental health dis-
orders had more than twice the odds of being an
opioid user (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.83–2.35). Other
notable factors in the fully adjusted model associ-
ated with opioid use included having a usual source
of care (OR, 1.67), having moderate or severe self-
reported pain (ORs , 2.15 and 3.15, respectively),
reporting a physical limitation (OR, 1.84), having
had surgery (ORs, 2.73 and 3.58 for outpatient and
inpatient surgery, respectively), and having a sub-
stance abuse diagnosis (OR, 2.42).
4 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
In our sensitivity analyses, all associations persisted
when varying our opioid user definition (from 1 to 5
prescriptions/year), and were more pronounced with
more stringent definitions of opioid use.
Discussion
Although, previous reports have documented the
association between having a mental health disor-
der and opioid use in specific populations, our
Table 1. Sociodemographic Characteristics and Health Status of U.S. Adults According to Mental Health Disorder
Status and Opioid Use
No Mental Health Disorder Mental Health Disorder
P Value* P Value†
Non–Opioid User
(n ϭ 42,908)
Opioid User
(n ϭ 1,983)
Non–Opioid User
(n ϭ 5,690)
Opioid User
(n ϭ 1,310)
No. of U.S. adults, millions 190.7 10.1 31.4 7.2
Sociodemographic characteristics
Age, years Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
18–44 49.4 29.7 40.0 25.1
45–64 32.7 42.0 39.8 51.9
Ն65 17.9 28.3 20.3 22.9
Sex .14 Ͻ.001
Male 51.2 45.8 34.8 32.2
Female 48.8 54.2 65.2 67.8
Race/ethnicity .03 Ͻ.001
Non-Hispanic white 62.8 74.1 79.3 80.6
Non-Hispanic black 12.2 13.5 7.1 8.2
Hispanic 16.5 8.7 9.4 6.8
Other or multiple races 8.4 3.7 4.1 4.5
Marital status Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Married 53.4 55.1 46.8 44.9
Divorced, separated, or
widowed
17.9 28.4 27.6 40.3
Never married 28.7 16.5 25.5 14.9
Education Ͻ.001 .06
High school or less 56.3 63.5 53.9 67.9
Some college or bachelor’s
degree
27.5 25.8 28.2 24.5
Advanced degree 16.2 10.7 17.9 7.6
Health insurance Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Private 67.9 60.5 65.8 47.1
Public 15.8 30.7 23.4 45.7
Uninsured 16.3 8.7 10.8 7.2
Health status
SF-12, mean (SE)
PCS score 50.9 (0.08) 37.8 (0.47) 47.7 (0.20) 33.5 (0.50) Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
MCS score 53.1 (0.06) 49.6 (0.32) 43.9 (0.20) 40.6 (0.40) Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Fair or poor overall health 8.8 32.2 21.0 54.3 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Number of comorbidities Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
0 89.0 72.8 78.3 58.2
1–2 7.9 15.9 15.4 23.7
Ն3 3.1 11.3 6.3 18.1
Data are percentages unless otherwise indicated. All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population. The
␹2
test was used to compare proportions.
*P value compares nonopioid users with opioid users among adults with mental health disorders.
†
P value compares adult opioid users with versus those without mental health disorders.
MCS, mental component summary; PCS, physical component summary; SE, standard error; SF-12, 12-item Short Form.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 5
study offers several contributions. First, we found
that the population of adults with mental health
disorders receive more than half of the total opioid
prescriptions in the United States. Second, among
the nearly 40 million Americans who have a mental
health condition, approximately 19% use prescrip-
tion opioids. Last, higher opioid use among those
with mental health disorders persists across key
characteristics, including cancer status and various
levels of self-reported pain.
Although evidence-based prescribing guidelines
are emerging,21,22
there exists a complex interac-
tion of factors related to the patient, provider, and
medical and social conditions that ultimately results
in the decision to prescribe an opioid.23
Our find-
ings that patients with mental illness are more
likely to receive opioid prescriptions across all dif-
ferent levels of pain suggests that there may be
additional patient- and provider-related factors
specific to those with mental illness that increase
the likelihood of receiving prescription opioids.
Such a relationship is particularly concerning be-
cause mental illness is also a prominent risk factor
for overdose and other adverse opioid-related out-
comes.24,25
Thus, the expectation would be that
physicians would be more conservative with their
prescribing behaviors in the setting of mental ill-
ness and favor nonopioid alternatives. The ability
Figure 1. Estimated number of adults with mental health disorders who use prescription opioids in the United
States. All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population.
Figure 2. Estimated percentages of U.S. adults with and without mental health disorders who use prescription
opioids, according to selected characteristics. All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized
population. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Musculoskeletal conditions include all forms of
arthritis, and other pain-related conditions.
6 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
to identify populations that may use prescription
opioids independent of pain would be of strategic
importance for mitigating potential risk at a popu-
lation health level.
The challenge with pain management is that
there is no biological measure of pain or objective
assessment of efficacy of treatment. The Interna-
tional Association for the Study of Pain adopted a
definition of pain that is widely accepted.26
The
definition states that pain is “an unpleasant sensory
and emotional experience, associated with actual or
threatened tissue damage, or described in terms of
such.” The definition thus relies on physician in-
terpretation and the subjective experience of the
patient. Thus, one could hypothesize that increased
opioid use in patients with mental health disorders
may be related to a variety of psychological factors
that may contribute to an increased subjective ex-
perience of pain or to increased likelihood of using
opioids irrespective of pain level.5
Our finding that approximately 19% of adults
with mental health disorders use prescription opi-
oids aligns with what is to our knowledge the only
other article that used nationally representative
data to examine this relationship. Halbert and col-
leagues8
examined patients with pain-related con-
ditions and found those who had mood disorders
were more likely to initiate opioid use than those
without mood disorders: 19.3% of patients with
pain and mood disorders initiated opioid use, com-
pared with 17.2% of patients with pain without
mood disorders. Evidence indicating an increased
risk of depressive symptoms in patients receiving
chronic opioids may raise concerns regarding re-
verse causality.27
The relationship between mental
health disorders and pain is also likely bidirectional,
with improvements in pain leading to improve-
ments in mental health symptoms and vice versa.28
Furthermore, some evidence indicates that opti-
mizing depression and pain treatment can improve
outcomes in both areas for patients seen in primary
care.29
Although the relationship between mental
health disorders, pain, and opioid use is complex,
we found that having a mental health disorder is
associated with increased opioid use even after con-
trolling for a wide array of other demographic and
clinical risk factors, including substance abuse. The
high prevalence of mental health disorders cou-
pled with prescription opioid use suggests that
this population is critical to consider when ad-
dressing the issue of opioid use from a health
system or policy perspective. Although a number
of important steps are already underway to ad-
dress opioid use in this country, such as the
Figure 3. Top 10 clinical diagnoses for prescription opioids among U.S. adults who have a mental health disorder.
All estimates are weighted to represent the number of prescriptions among the U.S. noninstitutionalized
population. The ␹2
test was used to compare proportions.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 7
recent Centers for Disease Control and Preven-
tion opioid prescribing guidelines,22
improving
treatment of comorbid mental health disorders
and pain will be an important focus when trying
to reduce the overall negative impacts of opioid
use on patients and communities.
Study Limitations
Our study has several limitations that must be
acknowledged. First, our study used a cross-sec-
tional, observational design and therefore is not
intended to demonstrate a cause–effect relation-
ship between having a mental health disorder and
using opioids. Thus we cannot rule out the ef-
fects of residual confounding nor potential re-
verse causality. However, with regard to the lat-
ter, recent evidence from longitudinal analyses
suggests opioid-naïve patients with mood disor-
ders are in fact more likely to initiate prescription
opioids and to transition to longer-term opioid
use than those without a mood disorder.8
Second,
because we focused on determining whether clin-
ical treatment varies by mental health disorder
status, our study only examined prescription opi-
oid use and therefore neglects any concurrent
illicit medication use. Third, we investigated the
association between mental health disorders and
opioid use among noninstitutionalized U.S. adult
citizens. Therefore, findings among children or
institutionalized adults may differ. Last, the
MEPS data on health care utilization and expen-
ditures are self-reported by patients, potentially
causing inaccuracies; however, the MEPS at-
tempts to correct self-reported errors by verify-
Table 2. Odds Ratios For the Association Between Independent Factors and Prescription Opioid Use
Independent Variables
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Unadjusted Adjusted*
Any mental health disorder 4.34 (3.93–4.77) 2.08 (1.83–2.35)
Age, years 1.02 (1.02–1.02) 0.99 (0.98–1.00)
Sex
Male 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Female 1.42 (1.31–1.55) 1.07 (0.96–0.99)
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Non-Hispanic black 0.83 (0.74–0.93) 0.80 (0.70–0.91)
Hispanic or Latino 0.43 (0.38–0.49) 0.58 (0.49–0.67)
Other 0.44 (0.35–0.56) 0.55 (0.42–0.72)
Health insurance coverage
Private 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Public 2.70 (2.44–3.00) 1.23 (1.06–1.42)
Uninsured 0.64 (0.54–0.76) 0.86 (0.70–1.06)
Has usual source of care 2.91 (2.49–3.39) 1.67 (1.39–2.02)
PCS score 0.91 (0.91–0.91) 0.96 (0.95–0.97)
Self-reported overall health status
Excellent to good 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Fair or poor 6.02 (5.38–6.74) 1.29 (1.11–1.48)
Self-reported limitation due to pain
None or little 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Moderate 5.25 (4.50–6.13) 2.15 (1.78–2.59)
Severe 15.24 (13.41–17.31) 3.15 (2.58–3.85)
Physical limitation 8.25 (7.40–9.20) 1.84 (1.56–2.17)
Has substance abuse diagnosis 4.29 (2.88–6.40) 2.42 (1.19–4.96)
Had outpatient surgery 4.62 (3.98–5.36) 2.73 (2.22–3.36)
Had inpatient surgery 7.02 (6.13–8.05) 3.58 (2.92–4.38)
All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population.
*Adjusted for all other factors in the table.
PCS, physical component summary.
8 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
ing response data with the participant’s health
care and insurance providers.
Despite these inherent limitations, our study of-
fers valuable insights regarding opioid use among
Americans with mental health disorders. Although
the relationship between mental health and pain
management is complex, we find that as a popula-
tion, adults with mental health disorders receive
more than half of all opioid prescriptions distrib-
uted each year in the United States. This finding
warrants more research to understand further the
association between mental health disorders and
prescription opioid use, and to promote safer opi-
oid use among this population.
To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/
30/4/000.full.
References
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011.
Understanding the epidemic: drug overdose deaths
in the United States continue to increase in 2015.
Updated December 16, 2016. Available from: http://
www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/. Accessed De-
cember 15, 2016.
2. Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, Gladden RM.
Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths–United
States, 2000–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly
Rep 2016;64:1378–82.
3. Helmerhorst GT, Vranceanu AM, Vrahas M, Smith
M, Ring D. Risk factors for continued opioid use one
to two months after surgery for musculoskeletal
trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:495–9.
4. Inacio MC, Hansen C, Pratt NL, Graves SE, Roug-
head EE. Risk factors for persistent and new chronic
opioid use in patients undergoing total hip arthro-
plasty: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016;
6:e010664.
5. Goesling J, Henry MJ, Moser SE, et al. Symptoms of
depression are associated with opioid use regardless
of pain severity and physical functioning among
treatment-seeking patients with chronic pain. J Pain
2015;16:844–51.
6. Sullivan MD, Edlund MJ, Zhang L, Unutzer J,
Wells KB. Association between mental health disor-
ders, problem drug use, and regular prescription
opioid use. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2087–93.
7. Seal KH, Shi Y, Cohen G, et al. Association of
mental health disorders with prescription opioids
and high-risk opioid use in US veterans of Iraq and
Afghanistan. JAMA 2012;307:940–7.
8. Halbert BT, Davis RB, Wee CC. Disproportionate
longer-term opioid use among U.S. adults with
mood disorders. Pain 2016;157:2452–7.
9. Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. De-
pression and pain comorbidity: a literature review.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2433–45.
10. Currie SR, Wang J. Chronic back pain and major
depression in the general Canadian population. Pain
2004;107:54–60.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Burden
of mental illness. Last reviewed July 1, 2011; last
updated October 4, 2013; Available from: https://
www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/basics/burden.htm. Ac-
cessed September 15, 2016.
12. Cohen JW, Cohen SB, Banthin JS. The Medical
Expenditure Panel Survey: a national information
resource to support healthcare cost research and
inform policy and practice. Med Care 2009;47
(7 Suppl 1):S44–50.
13. Guevara JP, Mandell DS, Rostain AL, Zhao H, Had-
ley TR. National estimates of health services expen-
ditures for children with behavioral disorders: an
analysis of the medical expenditure panel survey.
Pediatrics 2003;112(6 Pt 1):e440.
14. Cerner Corporation. Cerner Multum drug database.
Available from: http://www.cerner.com/cerner_
multum/. Accessed December 15, 2016.
15. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Healthcare Utilization Project. Clinical Classifica-
tion Software for ICD-9-CM. Last modified March
6, 2017. Available from: https://www.hcup-us.
ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Accessed De-
cember 15, 2016.
16. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item Short-
Form Health Survey: construction of scales and pre-
liminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care
1996;34:220–33.
17. DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner
P. Mortality prediction with a single general self-
rated health question. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern
Med 2006;21:267–75.
18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity
in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83.
19. D’Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C. Practical con-
siderations on the use of the Charlson Comorbidity
Index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epide-
miol 1996;49:1429–33.
20. Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in
the United States. J Pain 2012;13:715–24.
21. Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, et al.
Management of postoperative pain: a clinical prac-
tice guideline from the American Pain Society, the
American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain
Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiol-
ogists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Execu-
tive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain
2016;17:131–57.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 9
22. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline
for prescribing opioids for chronic pain–United
States, 2016. JAMA 2016;315:1624–45.
23. Turk DC, Okifuji A. What factors affect physicians’
decisions to prescribe opioids for chronic noncancer
pain patients? Clin J Pain 1997;13:330–6.
24. Cochran BN, Flentje A, Heck NC, et al. Factors
predicting development of opioid use disorders
among individuals who receive an initial opioid pre-
scription: mathematical modeling using a database of
commercially-insured individuals. Drug Alcohol De-
pend 2014;138:202–8.
25. Park TW, Lin LA, Hosanagar A, Kogowski A, Paige
K, Bohnert AS. Understanding risk factors for opioid
overdose in clinical populations to inform treatment
and policy. J Addict Med 2016;10:369–81.
26. Task Force on Taxonomy of the International Asso-
ciation for the Study of Pain. Classification of
Chronic Pain. Seattle (WA): IASP Press; 1994.
27. Scherrer JF, Salas J, Copeland LA, et al. Increased
risk of depression recurrence after initiation of pre-
scription opioids in noncancer pain patients. J Pain
2016;17:473–82.
28. Kroenke K, Wu J, Bair MJ, Krebs EE, Damush TM,
Tu W. Reciprocal relationship between pain and
depression: a 12-month longitudinal analysis in pri-
mary care. J Pain 2011;12:964–73.
29. Kroenke K, Bair MJ, Damush TM, et al. Optimized
antidepressant therapy and pain self-management in
primary care patients with depression and musculo-
skeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA
2009;301:2099–110.
10 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
Appendix
Appendix Table 1. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Participants with Mental Health Disorders According to
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification Diagnosis Codes
ICD-9-CM Code Description Participants with Code, n (% among adults)
296 Episodic mood disorders 671 (1.3)
300 Anxiety, dissociative, and somatoform disorders 3,644 (7.0)
311 Depressive disorder 4,362 (8.4)
ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.
Appendix Table 2. Health Status of U.S. Adults According to Mental Health Disorder Status and Opioid Use
No Mental Health Disorder Mental Health Disorder
P Value* P Value†
Non–Opioid User
(n ϭ 42,908)
Opioid User
(n ϭ 1,983)
Non–Opioid User
(n ϭ 5,690)
Opioid User
(n ϭ 1,310)
Health status
SF-12, mean (SE)
PCS score 50.9 (0.08) 37.8 (0.47) 47.7 (0.20) 33.5 (0.50) Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
MCS score 53.1 (0.06) 49.6 (0.32) 43.9 (0.20) 40.6 (0.40) Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Fair or poor overall health 8.8 32.2 21.0 54.3 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Self-reported limitation due to pain Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
None or little 84.6 40.2 69.4 21.2
Moderate 8.6 19.6 14.4 18.9
Severe 6.8 40.2 16.2 60.0
Smoker 15.2 24.9 22.4 36.7 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Number of comorbidities Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
0 89.0 72.8 78.3 58.2
1–2 7.9 15.9 15.4 23.7
Ն3 3.1 11.3 6.3 18.1
Self-reported limitation
Any self-reported limitation 19.6 61.2 42.7 81.2 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Physical limitation 8.3 40.1 21.0 59.3 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Social limitation 2.8 18.7 11.7 36.0 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Cognitive limitation 2.7 11.3 13.6 30.9 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001
Healthcare use
Has usual source of care 71.0 86.8 85.0 91.3 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.01
Had inpatient surgery 2.9 18.2 4.2 18.0 Ͻ.001 .93
Had outpatient surgery 3.6 17.5 6.1 13.7 Ͻ.001 .04
Had at least one ED visit for injury 15.3 41.5 25.1 43.5 Ͻ.001 .38
Data are percentages unless otherwise indicated. All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population. The
t test was used to compare means, and the ␹2
test was used to compare proportions.
*P value compares non–opioid users with opioid users among adults with mental health disorders.
†
P value compares adult opioid users with versus those without mental health disorders.
ED, emergency department; MCS, mental component summary; PCS, physical component summary; SE, standard error; SF-12,
12-item Short Form.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 11

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsenRx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsenOPUNITE
 
Rx16 pdmp tues_1230_1_small_2kreiner_3baumgartner_4traven
Rx16 pdmp tues_1230_1_small_2kreiner_3baumgartner_4travenRx16 pdmp tues_1230_1_small_2kreiner_3baumgartner_4traven
Rx16 pdmp tues_1230_1_small_2kreiner_3baumgartner_4travenOPUNITE
 
Influence of medicare formulary restrictions on evidence based prescribing pr...
Influence of medicare formulary restrictions on evidence based prescribing pr...Influence of medicare formulary restrictions on evidence based prescribing pr...
Influence of medicare formulary restrictions on evidence based prescribing pr...TÀI LIỆU NGÀNH MAY
 
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachioWeb only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachioOPUNITE
 
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinnerRx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinnerOPUNITE
 
Rx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
Rx16 workshop 200_group_pptRx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
Rx16 workshop 200_group_pptOPUNITE
 
Power Point Psy 492
Power Point Psy 492Power Point Psy 492
Power Point Psy 492jamescox1
 
Rx16 adv tues_1115_1_seymourhsu_2baird_3cochran_4hartung_5alexander
Rx16 adv tues_1115_1_seymourhsu_2baird_3cochran_4hartung_5alexanderRx16 adv tues_1115_1_seymourhsu_2baird_3cochran_4hartung_5alexander
Rx16 adv tues_1115_1_seymourhsu_2baird_3cochran_4hartung_5alexanderOPUNITE
 
Improving Opioid Prescribing in VA Primary Care by Erin E. Krebs, MD, MPH
Improving Opioid Prescribing in VA Primary Care by Erin E. Krebs, MD, MPHImproving Opioid Prescribing in VA Primary Care by Erin E. Krebs, MD, MPH
Improving Opioid Prescribing in VA Primary Care by Erin E. Krebs, MD, MPHUniversity of Michigan Injury Center
 
RomePsychiatricDrugs
RomePsychiatricDrugsRomePsychiatricDrugs
RomePsychiatricDrugsBarry Duncan
 
A Tool to Engage the Patient in Web-based Coordinated Treatment of Opioid Add...
A Tool to Engage the Patient in Web-based Coordinated Treatment of Opioid Add...A Tool to Engage the Patient in Web-based Coordinated Treatment of Opioid Add...
A Tool to Engage the Patient in Web-based Coordinated Treatment of Opioid Add...Clinical Tools, Inc
 
Pain Validity Test identifies drug seeking behavior. Stop opioid abuse. Prote...
Pain Validity Test identifies drug seeking behavior. Stop opioid abuse. Prote...Pain Validity Test identifies drug seeking behavior. Stop opioid abuse. Prote...
Pain Validity Test identifies drug seeking behavior. Stop opioid abuse. Prote...Nelson Hendler
 
Rx16 vs claad_tues_800_group
Rx16 vs claad_tues_800_groupRx16 vs claad_tues_800_group
Rx16 vs claad_tues_800_groupOPUNITE
 
Group Health Risk Reduction Initiatives: Can Opioid Dose Reduction Reduce Har...
Group Health Risk Reduction Initiatives: Can Opioid Dose Reduction Reduce Har...Group Health Risk Reduction Initiatives: Can Opioid Dose Reduction Reduce Har...
Group Health Risk Reduction Initiatives: Can Opioid Dose Reduction Reduce Har...University of Michigan Injury Center
 

Mais procurados (17)

Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsenRx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
 
Rx16 pdmp tues_1230_1_small_2kreiner_3baumgartner_4traven
Rx16 pdmp tues_1230_1_small_2kreiner_3baumgartner_4travenRx16 pdmp tues_1230_1_small_2kreiner_3baumgartner_4traven
Rx16 pdmp tues_1230_1_small_2kreiner_3baumgartner_4traven
 
Influence of medicare formulary restrictions on evidence based prescribing pr...
Influence of medicare formulary restrictions on evidence based prescribing pr...Influence of medicare formulary restrictions on evidence based prescribing pr...
Influence of medicare formulary restrictions on evidence based prescribing pr...
 
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachioWeb only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
 
Rita Nieves, "Boston Public Health Commission: A City's Health Department Per...
Rita Nieves, "Boston Public Health Commission: A City's Health Department Per...Rita Nieves, "Boston Public Health Commission: A City's Health Department Per...
Rita Nieves, "Boston Public Health Commission: A City's Health Department Per...
 
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinnerRx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
 
High Dose Initiation
High Dose InitiationHigh Dose Initiation
High Dose Initiation
 
Rx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
Rx16 workshop 200_group_pptRx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
Rx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
 
New study supports notion of skewed opioid prescribing
New study supports notion of skewed opioid prescribingNew study supports notion of skewed opioid prescribing
New study supports notion of skewed opioid prescribing
 
Power Point Psy 492
Power Point Psy 492Power Point Psy 492
Power Point Psy 492
 
Rx16 adv tues_1115_1_seymourhsu_2baird_3cochran_4hartung_5alexander
Rx16 adv tues_1115_1_seymourhsu_2baird_3cochran_4hartung_5alexanderRx16 adv tues_1115_1_seymourhsu_2baird_3cochran_4hartung_5alexander
Rx16 adv tues_1115_1_seymourhsu_2baird_3cochran_4hartung_5alexander
 
Improving Opioid Prescribing in VA Primary Care by Erin E. Krebs, MD, MPH
Improving Opioid Prescribing in VA Primary Care by Erin E. Krebs, MD, MPHImproving Opioid Prescribing in VA Primary Care by Erin E. Krebs, MD, MPH
Improving Opioid Prescribing in VA Primary Care by Erin E. Krebs, MD, MPH
 
RomePsychiatricDrugs
RomePsychiatricDrugsRomePsychiatricDrugs
RomePsychiatricDrugs
 
A Tool to Engage the Patient in Web-based Coordinated Treatment of Opioid Add...
A Tool to Engage the Patient in Web-based Coordinated Treatment of Opioid Add...A Tool to Engage the Patient in Web-based Coordinated Treatment of Opioid Add...
A Tool to Engage the Patient in Web-based Coordinated Treatment of Opioid Add...
 
Pain Validity Test identifies drug seeking behavior. Stop opioid abuse. Prote...
Pain Validity Test identifies drug seeking behavior. Stop opioid abuse. Prote...Pain Validity Test identifies drug seeking behavior. Stop opioid abuse. Prote...
Pain Validity Test identifies drug seeking behavior. Stop opioid abuse. Prote...
 
Rx16 vs claad_tues_800_group
Rx16 vs claad_tues_800_groupRx16 vs claad_tues_800_group
Rx16 vs claad_tues_800_group
 
Group Health Risk Reduction Initiatives: Can Opioid Dose Reduction Reduce Har...
Group Health Risk Reduction Initiatives: Can Opioid Dose Reduction Reduce Har...Group Health Risk Reduction Initiatives: Can Opioid Dose Reduction Reduce Har...
Group Health Risk Reduction Initiatives: Can Opioid Dose Reduction Reduce Har...
 

Semelhante a Prescription Opioid Use Among Adults with Mental Health Disorders in the US

Trends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docx
Trends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docxTrends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docx
Trends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docxwillcoxjanay
 
By Beth Han, Wilson M. Compton, Carlos Blanco, and Lisa J. Col
By Beth Han, Wilson M. Compton, Carlos Blanco, and Lisa J. ColBy Beth Han, Wilson M. Compton, Carlos Blanco, and Lisa J. Col
By Beth Han, Wilson M. Compton, Carlos Blanco, and Lisa J. ColTawnaDelatorrejs
 
Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose.
Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose.Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose.
Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose.Paul Coelho, MD
 
Patterns of Opioid Use and Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Among Medicaid Patients
Patterns of Opioid Use and Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Among Medicaid PatientsPatterns of Opioid Use and Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Among Medicaid Patients
Patterns of Opioid Use and Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Among Medicaid PatientsPaul Coelho, MD
 
Psychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief Review
Psychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief ReviewPsychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief Review
Psychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief ReviewHealthcare and Medical Sciences
 
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014Paul Coelho, MD
 
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014 (2)
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014 (2)Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014 (2)
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014 (2)Paul Coelho, MD
 
Article On Memantine-1.pptx
Article On Memantine-1.pptxArticle On Memantine-1.pptx
Article On Memantine-1.pptxNimish Savaliya
 
Intro to Prevention: Psychopharmacology Guest Lecture
Intro to Prevention: Psychopharmacology Guest LectureIntro to Prevention: Psychopharmacology Guest Lecture
Intro to Prevention: Psychopharmacology Guest LectureJulie Hynes
 
Dose Escalations In the First Year For CNP = Aberrancy
Dose Escalations In the First Year For CNP = AberrancyDose Escalations In the First Year For CNP = Aberrancy
Dose Escalations In the First Year For CNP = AberrancyPaul Coelho, MD
 
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2wallerRx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2wallerOPUNITE
 
10 Strategic Points My Degree.docx
10 Strategic Points                                 My Degree.docx10 Strategic Points                                 My Degree.docx
10 Strategic Points My Degree.docxtangyechloe
 
Impact of substance abuse on.pdf
Impact of substance abuse on.pdfImpact of substance abuse on.pdf
Impact of substance abuse on.pdfstudywriters
 
Hospital Care for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Conditions
Hospital Care for Mental Health and Substance Abuse ConditionsHospital Care for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Conditions
Hospital Care for Mental Health and Substance Abuse ConditionsLizbethQuinonez813
 
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER .docx
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER                   .docxRunning head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER                   .docx
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER .docxglendar3
 
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER .docx
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER                   .docxRunning head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER                   .docx
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER .docxtodd581
 
Ольга Бермант-Полякова. Новейшие исследования в современной зарубежной психол...
Ольга Бермант-Полякова. Новейшие исследования в современной зарубежной психол...Ольга Бермант-Полякова. Новейшие исследования в современной зарубежной психол...
Ольга Бермант-Полякова. Новейшие исследования в современной зарубежной психол...Olga Bermant-Polyakova
 

Semelhante a Prescription Opioid Use Among Adults with Mental Health Disorders in the US (20)

Trends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docx
Trends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docxTrends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docx
Trends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docx
 
By Beth Han, Wilson M. Compton, Carlos Blanco, and Lisa J. Col
By Beth Han, Wilson M. Compton, Carlos Blanco, and Lisa J. ColBy Beth Han, Wilson M. Compton, Carlos Blanco, and Lisa J. Col
By Beth Han, Wilson M. Compton, Carlos Blanco, and Lisa J. Col
 
Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose.
Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose.Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose.
Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose.
 
Patterns of Opioid Use and Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Among Medicaid Patients
Patterns of Opioid Use and Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Among Medicaid PatientsPatterns of Opioid Use and Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Among Medicaid Patients
Patterns of Opioid Use and Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Among Medicaid Patients
 
SSDI & Opioid Use
SSDI & Opioid UseSSDI & Opioid Use
SSDI & Opioid Use
 
Psychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief Review
Psychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief ReviewPsychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief Review
Psychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief Review
 
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014
 
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014 (2)
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014 (2)Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014 (2)
Incident opioid abuse and dependence sullivan 2014 (2)
 
Article On Memantine-1.pptx
Article On Memantine-1.pptxArticle On Memantine-1.pptx
Article On Memantine-1.pptx
 
Intro to Prevention: Psychopharmacology Guest Lecture
Intro to Prevention: Psychopharmacology Guest LectureIntro to Prevention: Psychopharmacology Guest Lecture
Intro to Prevention: Psychopharmacology Guest Lecture
 
Dose Escalations In the First Year For CNP = Aberrancy
Dose Escalations In the First Year For CNP = AberrancyDose Escalations In the First Year For CNP = Aberrancy
Dose Escalations In the First Year For CNP = Aberrancy
 
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2wallerRx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
Rx16 clinical wed_1230_1_shanehsaz_2waller
 
10 Strategic Points My Degree.docx
10 Strategic Points                                 My Degree.docx10 Strategic Points                                 My Degree.docx
10 Strategic Points My Degree.docx
 
Impact of substance abuse on.pdf
Impact of substance abuse on.pdfImpact of substance abuse on.pdf
Impact of substance abuse on.pdf
 
Hospital Care for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Conditions
Hospital Care for Mental Health and Substance Abuse ConditionsHospital Care for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Conditions
Hospital Care for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Conditions
 
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER .docx
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER                   .docxRunning head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER                   .docx
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER .docx
 
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER .docx
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER                   .docxRunning head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER                   .docx
Running head OPIOID CRISIS PUBLIC POLICY PAPER .docx
 
Ольга Бермант-Полякова. Новейшие исследования в современной зарубежной психол...
Ольга Бермант-Полякова. Новейшие исследования в современной зарубежной психол...Ольга Бермант-Полякова. Новейшие исследования в современной зарубежной психол...
Ольга Бермант-Полякова. Новейшие исследования в современной зарубежной психол...
 
NT104e
NT104eNT104e
NT104e
 
Installment 5
Installment 5Installment 5
Installment 5
 

Mais de Paul Coelho, MD

Suicidality Poster References.docx
Suicidality Poster References.docxSuicidality Poster References.docx
Suicidality Poster References.docxPaul Coelho, MD
 
Opioid Milli-equivalence Conversion Factors CDC
Opioid Milli-equivalence Conversion Factors CDCOpioid Milli-equivalence Conversion Factors CDC
Opioid Milli-equivalence Conversion Factors CDCPaul Coelho, MD
 
Labeling Woefulness: The Social Construction of Fibromyalgia
Labeling Woefulness: The Social Construction of FibromyalgiaLabeling Woefulness: The Social Construction of Fibromyalgia
Labeling Woefulness: The Social Construction of FibromyalgiaPaul Coelho, MD
 
Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrosp...
Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrosp...Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrosp...
Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrosp...Paul Coelho, MD
 
Pain Phenotyping Tool For Primary Care
Pain Phenotyping Tool For Primary CarePain Phenotyping Tool For Primary Care
Pain Phenotyping Tool For Primary CarePaul Coelho, MD
 
Fibromyalgia & Somatic Symptom Disorder Patient Handout
Fibromyalgia & Somatic Symptom Disorder Patient HandoutFibromyalgia & Somatic Symptom Disorder Patient Handout
Fibromyalgia & Somatic Symptom Disorder Patient HandoutPaul Coelho, MD
 
Community Catastrophizing
Community CatastrophizingCommunity Catastrophizing
Community CatastrophizingPaul Coelho, MD
 
Risk-Benefit High-Dose LTOT
Risk-Benefit High-Dose LTOTRisk-Benefit High-Dose LTOT
Risk-Benefit High-Dose LTOTPaul Coelho, MD
 
Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations notably within lowe...
Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations notably within lowe...Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations notably within lowe...
Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations notably within lowe...Paul Coelho, MD
 
Prescriptions filled following an opioid-related hospitalization.
Prescriptions filled following an opioid-related hospitalization.Prescriptions filled following an opioid-related hospitalization.
Prescriptions filled following an opioid-related hospitalization.Paul Coelho, MD
 
Jamapsychiatry santavirta 2017_oi_170084
Jamapsychiatry santavirta 2017_oi_170084Jamapsychiatry santavirta 2017_oi_170084
Jamapsychiatry santavirta 2017_oi_170084Paul Coelho, MD
 
Correlation of opioid mortality with prescriptions and social determinants -a...
Correlation of opioid mortality with prescriptions and social determinants -a...Correlation of opioid mortality with prescriptions and social determinants -a...
Correlation of opioid mortality with prescriptions and social determinants -a...Paul Coelho, MD
 
Gao recommendations to CMS
Gao recommendations to CMSGao recommendations to CMS
Gao recommendations to CMSPaul Coelho, MD
 
The place-of-antipsychotics-in-the-therapy-of-anxiety-disorders-and-obsessive...
The place-of-antipsychotics-in-the-therapy-of-anxiety-disorders-and-obsessive...The place-of-antipsychotics-in-the-therapy-of-anxiety-disorders-and-obsessive...
The place-of-antipsychotics-in-the-therapy-of-anxiety-disorders-and-obsessive...Paul Coelho, MD
 
Structured opioid refill clinic epic smartphrases
Structured opioid refill clinic epic smartphrases Structured opioid refill clinic epic smartphrases
Structured opioid refill clinic epic smartphrases Paul Coelho, MD
 
Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, an...
Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, an...Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, an...
Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, an...Paul Coelho, MD
 
The potential adverse influence of physicians’ words.
The potential adverse influence of physicians’ words.The potential adverse influence of physicians’ words.
The potential adverse influence of physicians’ words.Paul Coelho, MD
 
Ctaf chronic pain__evidence_report_100417
Ctaf chronic pain__evidence_report_100417Ctaf chronic pain__evidence_report_100417
Ctaf chronic pain__evidence_report_100417Paul Coelho, MD
 
The conundrum of opioid tapering in long term opioid therapy for chronic pain...
The conundrum of opioid tapering in long term opioid therapy for chronic pain...The conundrum of opioid tapering in long term opioid therapy for chronic pain...
The conundrum of opioid tapering in long term opioid therapy for chronic pain...Paul Coelho, MD
 

Mais de Paul Coelho, MD (20)

Suicidality Poster References.docx
Suicidality Poster References.docxSuicidality Poster References.docx
Suicidality Poster References.docx
 
Opioid Milli-equivalence Conversion Factors CDC
Opioid Milli-equivalence Conversion Factors CDCOpioid Milli-equivalence Conversion Factors CDC
Opioid Milli-equivalence Conversion Factors CDC
 
Labeling Woefulness: The Social Construction of Fibromyalgia
Labeling Woefulness: The Social Construction of FibromyalgiaLabeling Woefulness: The Social Construction of Fibromyalgia
Labeling Woefulness: The Social Construction of Fibromyalgia
 
Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrosp...
Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrosp...Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrosp...
Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrosp...
 
Pain Phenotyping Tool For Primary Care
Pain Phenotyping Tool For Primary CarePain Phenotyping Tool For Primary Care
Pain Phenotyping Tool For Primary Care
 
Fibromyalgia & Somatic Symptom Disorder Patient Handout
Fibromyalgia & Somatic Symptom Disorder Patient HandoutFibromyalgia & Somatic Symptom Disorder Patient Handout
Fibromyalgia & Somatic Symptom Disorder Patient Handout
 
Community Catastrophizing
Community CatastrophizingCommunity Catastrophizing
Community Catastrophizing
 
Risk-Benefit High-Dose LTOT
Risk-Benefit High-Dose LTOTRisk-Benefit High-Dose LTOT
Risk-Benefit High-Dose LTOT
 
Space Trial
Space TrialSpace Trial
Space Trial
 
Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations notably within lowe...
Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations notably within lowe...Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations notably within lowe...
Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations notably within lowe...
 
Prescriptions filled following an opioid-related hospitalization.
Prescriptions filled following an opioid-related hospitalization.Prescriptions filled following an opioid-related hospitalization.
Prescriptions filled following an opioid-related hospitalization.
 
Jamapsychiatry santavirta 2017_oi_170084
Jamapsychiatry santavirta 2017_oi_170084Jamapsychiatry santavirta 2017_oi_170084
Jamapsychiatry santavirta 2017_oi_170084
 
Correlation of opioid mortality with prescriptions and social determinants -a...
Correlation of opioid mortality with prescriptions and social determinants -a...Correlation of opioid mortality with prescriptions and social determinants -a...
Correlation of opioid mortality with prescriptions and social determinants -a...
 
Gao recommendations to CMS
Gao recommendations to CMSGao recommendations to CMS
Gao recommendations to CMS
 
The place-of-antipsychotics-in-the-therapy-of-anxiety-disorders-and-obsessive...
The place-of-antipsychotics-in-the-therapy-of-anxiety-disorders-and-obsessive...The place-of-antipsychotics-in-the-therapy-of-anxiety-disorders-and-obsessive...
The place-of-antipsychotics-in-the-therapy-of-anxiety-disorders-and-obsessive...
 
Structured opioid refill clinic epic smartphrases
Structured opioid refill clinic epic smartphrases Structured opioid refill clinic epic smartphrases
Structured opioid refill clinic epic smartphrases
 
Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, an...
Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, an...Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, an...
Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, an...
 
The potential adverse influence of physicians’ words.
The potential adverse influence of physicians’ words.The potential adverse influence of physicians’ words.
The potential adverse influence of physicians’ words.
 
Ctaf chronic pain__evidence_report_100417
Ctaf chronic pain__evidence_report_100417Ctaf chronic pain__evidence_report_100417
Ctaf chronic pain__evidence_report_100417
 
The conundrum of opioid tapering in long term opioid therapy for chronic pain...
The conundrum of opioid tapering in long term opioid therapy for chronic pain...The conundrum of opioid tapering in long term opioid therapy for chronic pain...
The conundrum of opioid tapering in long term opioid therapy for chronic pain...
 

Último

Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hyderabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girl Agency ❤️♀️@ Manjeet Russian Call Girls Service in Jai...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girl Agency ❤️♀️@ Manjeet Russian Call Girls Service in Jai...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girl Agency ❤️♀️@ Manjeet Russian Call Girls Service in Jai...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girl Agency ❤️♀️@ Manjeet Russian Call Girls Service in Jai...Gfnyt.com
 
Call Girls In ludhiana For Fun 9053900678 By ludhiana Call Girls For Pick...
Call Girls In  ludhiana  For Fun 9053900678 By  ludhiana  Call Girls For Pick...Call Girls In  ludhiana  For Fun 9053900678 By  ludhiana  Call Girls For Pick...
Call Girls In ludhiana For Fun 9053900678 By ludhiana Call Girls For Pick...Russian Call Girls in Ludhiana
 
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012Call Girls Service Gurgaon
 
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...gurkirankumar98700
 
Dehradun Call Girls Service 08854095900 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Dehradun Call Girls Service 08854095900 Real Russian Girls Looking ModelsDehradun Call Girls Service 08854095900 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Dehradun Call Girls Service 08854095900 Real Russian Girls Looking Modelsindiancallgirl4rent
 
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In RaipurCall Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipurgragmanisha42
 
Call Girls Thane Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Thane Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Thane Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Thane Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...Gfnyt.com
 
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in LucknowRussian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknowgragteena
 
Vip Kolkata Call Girls Cossipore 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Available With Room 24×7
Vip Kolkata Call Girls Cossipore 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Available With Room 24×7Vip Kolkata Call Girls Cossipore 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Available With Room 24×7
Vip Kolkata Call Girls Cossipore 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Available With Room 24×7Miss joya
 
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...gragteena
 
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★indiancallgirl4rent
 
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅gragmanisha42
 
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhHot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhVip call girls In Chandigarh
 
VIP Call Girls Noida Sia 9711199171 High Class Call Girl Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Sia 9711199171 High Class Call Girl Near MeVIP Call Girls Noida Sia 9711199171 High Class Call Girl Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Sia 9711199171 High Class Call Girl Near Memriyagarg453
 
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Jalandhar Female Call Girls Contact Number 9053900678 💚Jalandhar Female Call...
Jalandhar  Female Call Girls Contact Number 9053900678 💚Jalandhar Female Call...Jalandhar  Female Call Girls Contact Number 9053900678 💚Jalandhar Female Call...
Jalandhar Female Call Girls Contact Number 9053900678 💚Jalandhar Female Call...Call Girls Service Chandigarh Ayushi
 
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in UdaipurUdaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipurseemahedar019
 
💚😋Kolkata Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Kolkata Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋💚😋Kolkata Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Kolkata Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋Sheetaleventcompany
 

Último (20)

Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hyderabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girl Agency ❤️♀️@ Manjeet Russian Call Girls Service in Jai...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girl Agency ❤️♀️@ Manjeet Russian Call Girls Service in Jai...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girl Agency ❤️♀️@ Manjeet Russian Call Girls Service in Jai...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girl Agency ❤️♀️@ Manjeet Russian Call Girls Service in Jai...
 
Call Girls In ludhiana For Fun 9053900678 By ludhiana Call Girls For Pick...
Call Girls In  ludhiana  For Fun 9053900678 By  ludhiana  Call Girls For Pick...Call Girls In  ludhiana  For Fun 9053900678 By  ludhiana  Call Girls For Pick...
Call Girls In ludhiana For Fun 9053900678 By ludhiana Call Girls For Pick...
 
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
 
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
 
Dehradun Call Girls Service 08854095900 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Dehradun Call Girls Service 08854095900 Real Russian Girls Looking ModelsDehradun Call Girls Service 08854095900 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Dehradun Call Girls Service 08854095900 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
 
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In RaipurCall Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
 
Call Girls Thane Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Thane Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Thane Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Thane Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
 
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in LucknowRussian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
 
Vip Kolkata Call Girls Cossipore 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Available With Room 24×7
Vip Kolkata Call Girls Cossipore 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Available With Room 24×7Vip Kolkata Call Girls Cossipore 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Available With Room 24×7
Vip Kolkata Call Girls Cossipore 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Available With Room 24×7
 
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
 
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
 
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
 
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhHot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
 
VIP Call Girls Noida Sia 9711199171 High Class Call Girl Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Sia 9711199171 High Class Call Girl Near MeVIP Call Girls Noida Sia 9711199171 High Class Call Girl Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Sia 9711199171 High Class Call Girl Near Me
 
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
 
Jalandhar Female Call Girls Contact Number 9053900678 💚Jalandhar Female Call...
Jalandhar  Female Call Girls Contact Number 9053900678 💚Jalandhar Female Call...Jalandhar  Female Call Girls Contact Number 9053900678 💚Jalandhar Female Call...
Jalandhar Female Call Girls Contact Number 9053900678 💚Jalandhar Female Call...
 
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in UdaipurUdaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
 
💚😋Kolkata Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Kolkata Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋💚😋Kolkata Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Kolkata Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
 

Prescription Opioid Use Among Adults with Mental Health Disorders in the US

  • 1. ORIGINAL RESEARCH Prescription Opioid Use among Adults with Mental Health Disorders in the United States Matthew A. Davis, MPH, PhD, Lewei A. Lin, MD, Haiyin Liu, MA, and Brian D. Sites, MD, MS Background: The extent to which adults with mental health disorders in the United States receive opi- oids has not been adequately reported. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of the noninsti- tutionalized U.S. adult population from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We examined the rela- tionship between mental health (mood and anxiety) disorders and prescription opioid use (defined as receiving at least 2 prescriptions in a calendar year). Results: We estimate that among the 38.6 million Americans with mental health disorders, 18.7% (7.2 million of 38.6 million) use prescription opioids. Adults with mental health conditions receive 51.4% (60 million of 115 million prescriptions) of the total opioid prescriptions distributed in the United States each year. Compared with adults without mental health disorders, adults with mental health disorders were significantly more likely to use opioids (18.7% vs 5.0%; P < .001). In adjusted analyses, having a mental health disorder was associated with prescription opioid use overall (odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.83–2.35). Conclusions: The 16% of Americans who have mental health disorders receive over half of all opi- oids prescribed in the United States. Improving pain management among this population is critical to reduce national dependency on opioids. (J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:000–000.) Keywords: Analgesics, Opioid, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-sectional Studies, Mental Health, Opioid-Related Disor- ders, Pain Management, Prescriptions, Surveys and Questionnaires The United States is in the midst of an epidemic of morbidity and mortality due to prescription opioid use.1 Over the past 15 years the number of pre- scription opioid analgesic medications sold in the United States has quadrupled, yet the amount of pain or disability that Americans experience has remained unchanged.2 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that from 2000 to 2014, more than 165,000 people have died from overdoses related to prescription opioid use.2 The identification of specific populations that rely heav- ily on opioids is of strategic importance for risk mitigation efforts. For instance, attention has fo- cused on patients recovering from trauma and sur- gery, among whom poor coping strategies were associated with long-term reliance on opioids.3,4 Previous studies suggest that adults with mental health disorders (ie, mood and anxiety disorders) are more likely to be prescribed opioids and remain taking them long-term.5–8 For example, adults with mood disorders are nearly twice as likely to use opioids long-term for pain.8 In fact, pain is very common among adults with mental health disor- ders,9,10 and the relationship between mental ill- ness and opioid use is complex. However, some suggest that mental illness may be a moderator in the relationship between pain and opioid use.5 De- spite the increase in the prevalence of mental health disorders11 and the importance of tracking use of prescription opioids nationally, the extent to which This article was externally peer reviewed. Submitted 2 March 2017; revised 6 March 2017; accepted 10 March 2017. From the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation (MAD), the School of Nursing (MAD, HL), the Institute for Social Research (MAD), and the Addiction Center, Depart- ment of Psychiatry (LAL), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and the Department of Anesthesiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH (BDS). Funding: none. Conflict of interest: none declared. Corresponding author: Matthew A. Davis, MPH, PhD, University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls, Room 4347, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 ͑E-mail: mattadav@umich.edu). doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 1 PLEASE NOTE: Embargo deadline: Monday, June 26, 2017
  • 2. U.S. adults with mental health disorders use pre- scription opioids has not been thoroughly exam- ined. Furthermore, identification of the specific factors that may underpin the association would help clarify the complex relationship between men- tal health and pain. Therefore, we used the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to ex- amine the relationship between mental health dis- orders and prescription opioid use. Because anxiety and depression are the predominate mental health disorders among adults in the United States,11 we focused our attention on these 2 conditions. Our objective was to derive national estimates of opioid use among Americans with mental health disorders and to examine factors associated with such use. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study using nation- ally representative data from the MEPS, a survey of the U.S. noninstitutionalized population that is conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality that gathers extensive information on health care utilization (including prescription med- ications), expenditures, and health status.12 The survey uses an overlapping panel design consisting of a household component, a medical provider component, and an insurance provider component. To avoid potential recall bias, participants are sur- veyed about past health and health care use at 6-month intervals. Personal and family-level data obtained from the household, medical provider, and insurance provider components are aggregated by the MEPS study team. For this study we used data from the MEPS household component files, including the full-year consolidated, medical con- dition, and prescription medication files. Because our study used only publically available and deiden- tified data, it was granted an exemption from insti- tutional board review. Study Sample To increase the sample size in order to generate more stable national estimates for subgroups, we appended 2011 and 2013 MEPS data. These survey years were chosen because they were the most re- cently available at the time of analysis and ensured an adequate sample size. We excluded 2012 data because of duplication of participants due to the overlapping panel design (ie, aggregation of MEPS surveys in adjacent years would result in noninde- pendence of study participants). A total of 52,000 adults (aged Ն18 years) participated in MEPS in these 2 years (25,465 in 2011 and 26,535 in 2013). After ineligible respondents were removed, such as those who were institutionalized for a period of time during the study, our final analytic sample consisted of 51,891 adults. Measures Identification of Adults with Mental Health Disorders Each MEPS participant is asked to identify any health conditions in 6-month time periods. For those who have a self-reported health condition, trained MEPS staff code conditions using the In- ternational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revi- sion, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. A special feature of the MEPS is that the health care providers and facilities provide data on MEPS par- ticipants’ health care use; such data are then cross- referenced with survey responses from the partici- pant. Thus, if a person with a mental health disorder did not self-report having the condition, they would still be identified if they had a clinical diagnosis. Based on the combination of self-report and administrative clinical data, we identified partici- pants who had a mental health disorder. To do so we used ICD-9-CM codes truncated to the first 3 digits, including 300 (Anxiety, dissociative and so- matoform disorders), 311 (Depressive disorder), and 296 (Episodic mood disorders), to identify adult MEPS participants with mental health disor- ders13 (Appendix Table 1). Prescription Opioid Use The MEPS collects detailed data on prescription medications using a unique combination of partic- ipant self-report and administrative data obtained from pharmacies. MEPS participants are asked to supply the name of any prescribed medications and the name and location of the pharmacy where they obtained the prescription. Participants provide written permission for the release of pharmacy re- cords. Pharmacies are contacted to obtain records, which detail the date filled, the National Drug Code, medication name, strength of the medication (amount and unit), quantity (package size), and pay- ments by source. To identify meaningful classes of drugs, National Drug Codes are merged to the comprehensive Multum Lexicon crosswalk.14 We 2 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
  • 3. used the Multum drug classes for oral “Narcotic analgesics” and “Narcotic analgesics combinations” in order to identify oral prescription opioid medi- cations. In the MEPS prescription medication data, the most common oral opioid prescriptions— which account for approximately 65% of all opioid prescriptions—include hydrocodone with acet- aminophen, tramadol, hydrocodone with acetamin- ophen, and hydrocodone. Our study was focused on examining the likelihood of receiving prescrip- tion opioid medications rather than chronic use; thus we operationally defined an opioid user as an adult who filled Ն2 prescription medications in the calendar year. To explore the clinical diagnoses associated with prescription opioids, we also examined the top 10 clinical diagnoses for which opioids were pre- scribed. To collapse ICD-9-CM codes into rele- vant clinical disorders, the MEPS uses the Clinical Classification Software developed by the Health- care Cost and Utilization Project.15 Covariates We extracted a variety of health measures to be used as covariates (Appendix Table 2). The MEPS administers the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF- 12) to participants.16 From these data, we calcu- lated the mean physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of the SF-12 (PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the highest level of health). We examined several items of the SF-12 separately as well. We collapsed self-reported health status17 into “excellent, very good, or good” versus “fair or poor.” Because pain is the primary driver of prescription opioid use, we examined the SF-12 item on pain. The item inquires, “During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including work outside the home and housework)?” We collapsed the response set into none or little (“not at all” or “a little bit”), moderate (“moderately”) or severe (“quite a bit” or “extremely”). Based on a combination of measures of both physical and cognitive limitations, we also calculated the percentage of participants with “any functional limitation,” “physical limitation,” “social limitation,” and “cognitive limitation.” We also identified those who were smokers (current vs never or former). Last, based on all medical condi- tions (ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes reported in the medical condition files) we generated a comorbid- ity score. To do so, we applied a modified version of the Charlson Comorbidity Index18 developed by D’Hoore et al.19 We used ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes 303 (Alco- hol dependence syndrome), 304 (Drug depen- dence), and 305 (Nondependent abuse of drugs) to identify study participants with substance abuse disorders. The MEPS inquires about cancer diag- noses; we used these items to identify participants who had cancer. We also identified participants with musculoskeletal conditions using a previously applied approach.20 From the MEPS annual consolidated files, we ex- tracted sociodemographic data for participants in our study, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital sta- tus, level of education, and health insurance coverage. Age was collapsed into relevant age categories, in- cluding young adult (18–44 years), middle-aged adult (45–64 years), and older adult (Ն65 years). We also identified those adults who underwent an outpatient surgery, underwent surgery during an inpatient ad- mission, or visited an emergency department specifi- cally related to a physical injury. Statistical Analyses Our primary analyses examined the relationship between having a mental health disorder and the likelihood of prescription opioid use. We used sim- ple descriptive measures to examine differences be- tween adults with mental health disorders and those without, restricted to those with specific characteristics (eg, a cancer diagnosis, those self- reporting having severe pain, etc.). The ␹2 test was used to compare proportions and an independent t test was used to compare means. A 2-sided P value Ͻ.05 was considered statistically significant. We used logit models to examine the relation- ship while adjusting for differences, and coefficients from our models were exponentiated to express associations in the form of odds ratios. Covariates in our model included age (continuous), sex, race/ ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), health insurance coverage (pri- vate, public, uninsured), having a usual source of care, self-reported limitation due to pain (little/ none, moderate, severe), PCS score (continuous), physical limitation, substance use disorder diagno- sis, outpatient surgery use, and inpatient surgery use. Because our operational definition of an opioid user was based on receiving 2 or more prescriptions in the calendar year, we also performed a sensitivity doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 3
  • 4. analysis in which we varied our definition to in- clude between 1 and 5 prescriptions and then re- examined associations. For all analyses we used complex survey design methods to make national estimates, which account for a participant’s probability of selection and sam- pling methodology. Because our study aggregated 2011 and 2013 MEPS data, survey weights were adjusted so that the data represented a single cal- endar year. Analyses were based on complete case analysis, and we assumed any missing values to be missing completely at random. Analyses were con- ducted using Stata MP, version 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results Among the 239.4 million U.S. adults, we estimate that 38.6 million had a mental health disorder (Ta- ble 1 and Figure 1). Of the adults with mental health disorders, 18.7% were opioid users, com- pared with only 5.0% among those without mental health disorders (P Ͻ.001) (Figure 2). We estimate that approximately 115 million opioid prescriptions are distributed each year in the United States, 51.4% (60 million prescriptions) of which are re- ceived by adults who have a mental health disorder. Characteristics of Adults with a Mental Health Disorder Who Use Opioids Among adults with mental health disorders, opioid users differed in several ways. Opioid users were older (nearly 75% of opioid users were aged Ն45 years compared with 60% among nonopioid users), more likely to be non-Hispanic white, and com- pleted less educational (P Ͻ .001 for all) (Table 1). Comparing opioid users with and without a mental health disorder, those with a mental health disorder were more likely to be middle-aged, female, non- Hispanic white, and divorced, separated, or wid- owed. Among adults with mental health disorders, opi- oid users were considerably less healthy than non- opioid users (Table 1 and Appendix Table 2). The mean PCS score was 33.5 (standard error, 0.50) among opioid users versus 47.7 (standard error, 0.20) among nonopioid users (P Ͻ .001). Likewise, among adults with mental health disorders, opioid users had considerably more comorbidities; for in- stance, 18.1% of opioid users had Ն3 comorbidi- ties, compared with just 6.3% among nonopioid users. Adults with mental health disorders who use opioids also had much higher self-reported pain levels (eg, 60.0% of opioid users reported severe pain compared with only 16.2% among nonopioid users). Among opioid users, those with mental health disorders were less healthy than those with- out mental health disorders, but the differences were less pronounced. Opioid Use Among Adults with Mental Health Disorders Among specific subpopulations based on the level of self-reported pain, cancer diagnosis, and muscu- loskeletal conditions, the higher percentage of opi- oid users persisted among adults with mental health conditions compared with those without (P Ͻ .001 for all) (Figure 2). Most notable was nearly twice the percentage of opioid users among adults with severe pain (45.3% of adults with mental health disorders were opioid users compared with 24.1% among those without mental health disorders). The top 10 clinical diagnoses associated with prescription opioids for Americans with mental health disorders included musculoskeletal disor- ders, poorly defined conditions, or an otherwise missing diagnosis (Figure 3). The top 10 clinical diagnoses we identified among adults with mental health disorders account for 54.0% of the total opioids prescribed to this population, suggesting considerable variation in clinical diagnosis. Association Between Mental Health Disorders and Opioid Use In unadjusted analyses the odds of opioid use was Ͼ4 times higher among adults with mental health disorders than among those without (odds ratio [OR], 4.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.93– 4.77) (Table 2). After adjusting for sociodemo- graphic characteristics, health status, and use of selected health services, although attenuated, the association persisted: adults with mental health dis- orders had more than twice the odds of being an opioid user (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.83–2.35). Other notable factors in the fully adjusted model associ- ated with opioid use included having a usual source of care (OR, 1.67), having moderate or severe self- reported pain (ORs , 2.15 and 3.15, respectively), reporting a physical limitation (OR, 1.84), having had surgery (ORs, 2.73 and 3.58 for outpatient and inpatient surgery, respectively), and having a sub- stance abuse diagnosis (OR, 2.42). 4 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
  • 5. In our sensitivity analyses, all associations persisted when varying our opioid user definition (from 1 to 5 prescriptions/year), and were more pronounced with more stringent definitions of opioid use. Discussion Although, previous reports have documented the association between having a mental health disor- der and opioid use in specific populations, our Table 1. Sociodemographic Characteristics and Health Status of U.S. Adults According to Mental Health Disorder Status and Opioid Use No Mental Health Disorder Mental Health Disorder P Value* P Value† Non–Opioid User (n ϭ 42,908) Opioid User (n ϭ 1,983) Non–Opioid User (n ϭ 5,690) Opioid User (n ϭ 1,310) No. of U.S. adults, millions 190.7 10.1 31.4 7.2 Sociodemographic characteristics Age, years Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 18–44 49.4 29.7 40.0 25.1 45–64 32.7 42.0 39.8 51.9 Ն65 17.9 28.3 20.3 22.9 Sex .14 Ͻ.001 Male 51.2 45.8 34.8 32.2 Female 48.8 54.2 65.2 67.8 Race/ethnicity .03 Ͻ.001 Non-Hispanic white 62.8 74.1 79.3 80.6 Non-Hispanic black 12.2 13.5 7.1 8.2 Hispanic 16.5 8.7 9.4 6.8 Other or multiple races 8.4 3.7 4.1 4.5 Marital status Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Married 53.4 55.1 46.8 44.9 Divorced, separated, or widowed 17.9 28.4 27.6 40.3 Never married 28.7 16.5 25.5 14.9 Education Ͻ.001 .06 High school or less 56.3 63.5 53.9 67.9 Some college or bachelor’s degree 27.5 25.8 28.2 24.5 Advanced degree 16.2 10.7 17.9 7.6 Health insurance Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Private 67.9 60.5 65.8 47.1 Public 15.8 30.7 23.4 45.7 Uninsured 16.3 8.7 10.8 7.2 Health status SF-12, mean (SE) PCS score 50.9 (0.08) 37.8 (0.47) 47.7 (0.20) 33.5 (0.50) Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 MCS score 53.1 (0.06) 49.6 (0.32) 43.9 (0.20) 40.6 (0.40) Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Fair or poor overall health 8.8 32.2 21.0 54.3 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Number of comorbidities Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 0 89.0 72.8 78.3 58.2 1–2 7.9 15.9 15.4 23.7 Ն3 3.1 11.3 6.3 18.1 Data are percentages unless otherwise indicated. All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population. The ␹2 test was used to compare proportions. *P value compares nonopioid users with opioid users among adults with mental health disorders. † P value compares adult opioid users with versus those without mental health disorders. MCS, mental component summary; PCS, physical component summary; SE, standard error; SF-12, 12-item Short Form. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 5
  • 6. study offers several contributions. First, we found that the population of adults with mental health disorders receive more than half of the total opioid prescriptions in the United States. Second, among the nearly 40 million Americans who have a mental health condition, approximately 19% use prescrip- tion opioids. Last, higher opioid use among those with mental health disorders persists across key characteristics, including cancer status and various levels of self-reported pain. Although evidence-based prescribing guidelines are emerging,21,22 there exists a complex interac- tion of factors related to the patient, provider, and medical and social conditions that ultimately results in the decision to prescribe an opioid.23 Our find- ings that patients with mental illness are more likely to receive opioid prescriptions across all dif- ferent levels of pain suggests that there may be additional patient- and provider-related factors specific to those with mental illness that increase the likelihood of receiving prescription opioids. Such a relationship is particularly concerning be- cause mental illness is also a prominent risk factor for overdose and other adverse opioid-related out- comes.24,25 Thus, the expectation would be that physicians would be more conservative with their prescribing behaviors in the setting of mental ill- ness and favor nonopioid alternatives. The ability Figure 1. Estimated number of adults with mental health disorders who use prescription opioids in the United States. All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population. Figure 2. Estimated percentages of U.S. adults with and without mental health disorders who use prescription opioids, according to selected characteristics. All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Musculoskeletal conditions include all forms of arthritis, and other pain-related conditions. 6 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
  • 7. to identify populations that may use prescription opioids independent of pain would be of strategic importance for mitigating potential risk at a popu- lation health level. The challenge with pain management is that there is no biological measure of pain or objective assessment of efficacy of treatment. The Interna- tional Association for the Study of Pain adopted a definition of pain that is widely accepted.26 The definition states that pain is “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience, associated with actual or threatened tissue damage, or described in terms of such.” The definition thus relies on physician in- terpretation and the subjective experience of the patient. Thus, one could hypothesize that increased opioid use in patients with mental health disorders may be related to a variety of psychological factors that may contribute to an increased subjective ex- perience of pain or to increased likelihood of using opioids irrespective of pain level.5 Our finding that approximately 19% of adults with mental health disorders use prescription opi- oids aligns with what is to our knowledge the only other article that used nationally representative data to examine this relationship. Halbert and col- leagues8 examined patients with pain-related con- ditions and found those who had mood disorders were more likely to initiate opioid use than those without mood disorders: 19.3% of patients with pain and mood disorders initiated opioid use, com- pared with 17.2% of patients with pain without mood disorders. Evidence indicating an increased risk of depressive symptoms in patients receiving chronic opioids may raise concerns regarding re- verse causality.27 The relationship between mental health disorders and pain is also likely bidirectional, with improvements in pain leading to improve- ments in mental health symptoms and vice versa.28 Furthermore, some evidence indicates that opti- mizing depression and pain treatment can improve outcomes in both areas for patients seen in primary care.29 Although the relationship between mental health disorders, pain, and opioid use is complex, we found that having a mental health disorder is associated with increased opioid use even after con- trolling for a wide array of other demographic and clinical risk factors, including substance abuse. The high prevalence of mental health disorders cou- pled with prescription opioid use suggests that this population is critical to consider when ad- dressing the issue of opioid use from a health system or policy perspective. Although a number of important steps are already underway to ad- dress opioid use in this country, such as the Figure 3. Top 10 clinical diagnoses for prescription opioids among U.S. adults who have a mental health disorder. All estimates are weighted to represent the number of prescriptions among the U.S. noninstitutionalized population. The ␹2 test was used to compare proportions. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 7
  • 8. recent Centers for Disease Control and Preven- tion opioid prescribing guidelines,22 improving treatment of comorbid mental health disorders and pain will be an important focus when trying to reduce the overall negative impacts of opioid use on patients and communities. Study Limitations Our study has several limitations that must be acknowledged. First, our study used a cross-sec- tional, observational design and therefore is not intended to demonstrate a cause–effect relation- ship between having a mental health disorder and using opioids. Thus we cannot rule out the ef- fects of residual confounding nor potential re- verse causality. However, with regard to the lat- ter, recent evidence from longitudinal analyses suggests opioid-naïve patients with mood disor- ders are in fact more likely to initiate prescription opioids and to transition to longer-term opioid use than those without a mood disorder.8 Second, because we focused on determining whether clin- ical treatment varies by mental health disorder status, our study only examined prescription opi- oid use and therefore neglects any concurrent illicit medication use. Third, we investigated the association between mental health disorders and opioid use among noninstitutionalized U.S. adult citizens. Therefore, findings among children or institutionalized adults may differ. Last, the MEPS data on health care utilization and expen- ditures are self-reported by patients, potentially causing inaccuracies; however, the MEPS at- tempts to correct self-reported errors by verify- Table 2. Odds Ratios For the Association Between Independent Factors and Prescription Opioid Use Independent Variables Odds Ratio (95% CI) Unadjusted Adjusted* Any mental health disorder 4.34 (3.93–4.77) 2.08 (1.83–2.35) Age, years 1.02 (1.02–1.02) 0.99 (0.98–1.00) Sex Male 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) Female 1.42 (1.31–1.55) 1.07 (0.96–0.99) Race/ethnicity Non-Hispanic white 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) Non-Hispanic black 0.83 (0.74–0.93) 0.80 (0.70–0.91) Hispanic or Latino 0.43 (0.38–0.49) 0.58 (0.49–0.67) Other 0.44 (0.35–0.56) 0.55 (0.42–0.72) Health insurance coverage Private 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) Public 2.70 (2.44–3.00) 1.23 (1.06–1.42) Uninsured 0.64 (0.54–0.76) 0.86 (0.70–1.06) Has usual source of care 2.91 (2.49–3.39) 1.67 (1.39–2.02) PCS score 0.91 (0.91–0.91) 0.96 (0.95–0.97) Self-reported overall health status Excellent to good 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) Fair or poor 6.02 (5.38–6.74) 1.29 (1.11–1.48) Self-reported limitation due to pain None or little 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) Moderate 5.25 (4.50–6.13) 2.15 (1.78–2.59) Severe 15.24 (13.41–17.31) 3.15 (2.58–3.85) Physical limitation 8.25 (7.40–9.20) 1.84 (1.56–2.17) Has substance abuse diagnosis 4.29 (2.88–6.40) 2.42 (1.19–4.96) Had outpatient surgery 4.62 (3.98–5.36) 2.73 (2.22–3.36) Had inpatient surgery 7.02 (6.13–8.05) 3.58 (2.92–4.38) All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population. *Adjusted for all other factors in the table. PCS, physical component summary. 8 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
  • 9. ing response data with the participant’s health care and insurance providers. Despite these inherent limitations, our study of- fers valuable insights regarding opioid use among Americans with mental health disorders. Although the relationship between mental health and pain management is complex, we find that as a popula- tion, adults with mental health disorders receive more than half of all opioid prescriptions distrib- uted each year in the United States. This finding warrants more research to understand further the association between mental health disorders and prescription opioid use, and to promote safer opi- oid use among this population. To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/ 30/4/000.full. References 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. Understanding the epidemic: drug overdose deaths in the United States continue to increase in 2015. Updated December 16, 2016. Available from: http:// www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/. Accessed De- cember 15, 2016. 2. Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, Gladden RM. Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths–United States, 2000–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;64:1378–82. 3. Helmerhorst GT, Vranceanu AM, Vrahas M, Smith M, Ring D. Risk factors for continued opioid use one to two months after surgery for musculoskeletal trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:495–9. 4. Inacio MC, Hansen C, Pratt NL, Graves SE, Roug- head EE. Risk factors for persistent and new chronic opioid use in patients undergoing total hip arthro- plasty: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010664. 5. Goesling J, Henry MJ, Moser SE, et al. Symptoms of depression are associated with opioid use regardless of pain severity and physical functioning among treatment-seeking patients with chronic pain. J Pain 2015;16:844–51. 6. Sullivan MD, Edlund MJ, Zhang L, Unutzer J, Wells KB. Association between mental health disor- ders, problem drug use, and regular prescription opioid use. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2087–93. 7. Seal KH, Shi Y, Cohen G, et al. Association of mental health disorders with prescription opioids and high-risk opioid use in US veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. JAMA 2012;307:940–7. 8. Halbert BT, Davis RB, Wee CC. Disproportionate longer-term opioid use among U.S. adults with mood disorders. Pain 2016;157:2452–7. 9. Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. De- pression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2433–45. 10. Currie SR, Wang J. Chronic back pain and major depression in the general Canadian population. Pain 2004;107:54–60. 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Burden of mental illness. Last reviewed July 1, 2011; last updated October 4, 2013; Available from: https:// www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/basics/burden.htm. Ac- cessed September 15, 2016. 12. Cohen JW, Cohen SB, Banthin JS. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national information resource to support healthcare cost research and inform policy and practice. Med Care 2009;47 (7 Suppl 1):S44–50. 13. Guevara JP, Mandell DS, Rostain AL, Zhao H, Had- ley TR. National estimates of health services expen- ditures for children with behavioral disorders: an analysis of the medical expenditure panel survey. Pediatrics 2003;112(6 Pt 1):e440. 14. Cerner Corporation. Cerner Multum drug database. Available from: http://www.cerner.com/cerner_ multum/. Accessed December 15, 2016. 15. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Utilization Project. Clinical Classifica- tion Software for ICD-9-CM. Last modified March 6, 2017. Available from: https://www.hcup-us. ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Accessed De- cember 15, 2016. 16. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item Short- Form Health Survey: construction of scales and pre- liminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–33. 17. DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self- rated health question. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:267–75. 18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83. 19. D’Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C. Practical con- siderations on the use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epide- miol 1996;49:1429–33. 20. Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain 2012;13:715–24. 21. Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, et al. Management of postoperative pain: a clinical prac- tice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiol- ogists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Execu- tive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain 2016;17:131–57. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 9
  • 10. 22. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain–United States, 2016. JAMA 2016;315:1624–45. 23. Turk DC, Okifuji A. What factors affect physicians’ decisions to prescribe opioids for chronic noncancer pain patients? Clin J Pain 1997;13:330–6. 24. Cochran BN, Flentje A, Heck NC, et al. Factors predicting development of opioid use disorders among individuals who receive an initial opioid pre- scription: mathematical modeling using a database of commercially-insured individuals. Drug Alcohol De- pend 2014;138:202–8. 25. Park TW, Lin LA, Hosanagar A, Kogowski A, Paige K, Bohnert AS. Understanding risk factors for opioid overdose in clinical populations to inform treatment and policy. J Addict Med 2016;10:369–81. 26. Task Force on Taxonomy of the International Asso- ciation for the Study of Pain. Classification of Chronic Pain. Seattle (WA): IASP Press; 1994. 27. Scherrer JF, Salas J, Copeland LA, et al. Increased risk of depression recurrence after initiation of pre- scription opioids in noncancer pain patients. J Pain 2016;17:473–82. 28. Kroenke K, Wu J, Bair MJ, Krebs EE, Damush TM, Tu W. Reciprocal relationship between pain and depression: a 12-month longitudinal analysis in pri- mary care. J Pain 2011;12:964–73. 29. Kroenke K, Bair MJ, Damush TM, et al. Optimized antidepressant therapy and pain self-management in primary care patients with depression and musculo- skeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009;301:2099–110. 10 JABFM July–August 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 http://www.jabfm.org
  • 11. Appendix Appendix Table 1. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Participants with Mental Health Disorders According to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification Diagnosis Codes ICD-9-CM Code Description Participants with Code, n (% among adults) 296 Episodic mood disorders 671 (1.3) 300 Anxiety, dissociative, and somatoform disorders 3,644 (7.0) 311 Depressive disorder 4,362 (8.4) ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Appendix Table 2. Health Status of U.S. Adults According to Mental Health Disorder Status and Opioid Use No Mental Health Disorder Mental Health Disorder P Value* P Value† Non–Opioid User (n ϭ 42,908) Opioid User (n ϭ 1,983) Non–Opioid User (n ϭ 5,690) Opioid User (n ϭ 1,310) Health status SF-12, mean (SE) PCS score 50.9 (0.08) 37.8 (0.47) 47.7 (0.20) 33.5 (0.50) Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 MCS score 53.1 (0.06) 49.6 (0.32) 43.9 (0.20) 40.6 (0.40) Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Fair or poor overall health 8.8 32.2 21.0 54.3 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Self-reported limitation due to pain Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 None or little 84.6 40.2 69.4 21.2 Moderate 8.6 19.6 14.4 18.9 Severe 6.8 40.2 16.2 60.0 Smoker 15.2 24.9 22.4 36.7 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Number of comorbidities Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 0 89.0 72.8 78.3 58.2 1–2 7.9 15.9 15.4 23.7 Ն3 3.1 11.3 6.3 18.1 Self-reported limitation Any self-reported limitation 19.6 61.2 42.7 81.2 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Physical limitation 8.3 40.1 21.0 59.3 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Social limitation 2.8 18.7 11.7 36.0 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Cognitive limitation 2.7 11.3 13.6 30.9 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.001 Healthcare use Has usual source of care 71.0 86.8 85.0 91.3 Ͻ.001 Ͻ.01 Had inpatient surgery 2.9 18.2 4.2 18.0 Ͻ.001 .93 Had outpatient surgery 3.6 17.5 6.1 13.7 Ͻ.001 .04 Had at least one ED visit for injury 15.3 41.5 25.1 43.5 Ͻ.001 .38 Data are percentages unless otherwise indicated. All estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. noninstitutionalized population. The t test was used to compare means, and the ␹2 test was used to compare proportions. *P value compares non–opioid users with opioid users among adults with mental health disorders. † P value compares adult opioid users with versus those without mental health disorders. ED, emergency department; MCS, mental component summary; PCS, physical component summary; SE, standard error; SF-12, 12-item Short Form. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 Prescription Opioid Use and Mental Health 11