SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 28
Baixar para ler offline
The Potentials and Pitfalls of Rapid Assessments for
               Visitor Management



                                R.J. Payne
                            Lakehead University


Transforming Visitor Management - Improving the Understanding of Protected Area
                       Clientele with Declining Resources

 Centre for Applied Science in Ontario Protected Areas (CASIOPA) Annual Meeting
                                 Toronto, Ontario
                          January 31 – February 1, 2013
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Introduction
   Context
             Parks Canada
             Ontario Parks
   Terms
             Assessment
             Visitor Management
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Rapid Assessments
       Visitor Impacts on Parks and Protected Areas
              Parks Canada's Visitor Activity Profiles
                      Potentials and Pitfalls
       Visitor Experiences in Parks and Protected Areas
              Existing Data Sources in Parks Canada and Ontario
                Parks
                     Potentials and Pitfalls
              Social Media as Data
                     Potentials and Pitfalls
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Conclusions
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Context
   Science-based decision-making and evaluation is better than
   alternatives
   Parks Canada
          National Parks
                  Ecological integrity – first consideration
                  Then, education and visitor experiences
          NMCAs
                  Ecological sustainability, commemorative integrity
                    and visitor experiences
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Socio-political Pressures
       Generate more revenue
       Science under siege
Visitor Management Capacity
       Reduced: 2/3 of social scientists cut, service centres
        eliminated
       Direction: Real, inspiring, memorable experiences
Oversight
       Auditor-General of Canada (Commissioner for
        Environment and Sustainable Development)
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Ontario Parks
       Provincial Parks
                Wilderness, natural environment classes →
                 ecological integrity
                Waterway, nature reserve and recreation: not clear if
                 ecological integrity is the primary objective
                Non-operating parks, not managed
       Conservation Reserves
                Beyond designation, not managed
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Socio-political Pressures
       86% of operating budget from tourism-related
        revenues (Eagles, 2012)
       Fiscal restraint
Visitor Management Capacity
       Limited
       Direction: none
Oversight
       Auditor-General of Ontario
       Environmental Commissioner of Ontario
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Terms
  Assessment
        = Evaluation
        The Management
          Effectiveness
          Initiative (WCPA)
        The Green List (WCPA)




                                    Source: Hockings et al., 2006
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management




Source: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Visitor Management
       Definition: Visitor management is the practice of ensuring
         that the visitor achieves a quality experience in an
         environmentally sustainable manner.
       Outputs: communication, interpretation, safety and
         enforcement
       Outcomes:
              visitor impacts on natural environments
              visitor experiences
       WCPA work focuses on outputs rather than outcomes
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Rapid Assessments
   Visitor Impacts on Parks and Protected Areas
          Parks Canada's Visitor Activity Profiles
                  Legislation/policy basis
                  Identify socio-demographic characteristics, servicing
                    requirements and environmental impacts of
                    activities
                  Existing knowledge
                  Afford designation of “appropriate activities” based in
                   part on environmental impacts
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



An example: Hang Gliding
       Deemed inappropriate
       Likely environmental
          impacts related to
          servicing the activity
       Parking, roads,
         vegetation removal
       Experiences PA related?
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Potentials
           Existing information and knowledge
           Supports ecological integrity part of mandate
           Relatively quick
Pitfalls
           Appropriateness has been contested
           If appropriate, no determination of how much of the
              activity
           Activities are diverse (e.g., X-C skiing) and can change
           If ecological integrity is NOT a management goal?
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Visitor Experiences in Parks and
Protected Areas
        Existing Data Sources in
          Parks Canada and
          Ontario Parks
        Parks Canada's “Visitor
          Information
          Program”
        Pukaskwa 2006, 214 of
          385 randomly
          selected parties
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Frontcountry visitors
Purpose:
       to gather information on the demographic characteristics of visitors,
       to determine the visitor’s level of satisfaction with services and facilities at the site,
       to determine the level of participation and satisfaction with interpretive programs and activities,
       to determine the level of understanding of the site’s key messages, and
       to understand more about the visitor’s trip to Pukaskwa National Park.

Potentials
       Regular, randomized, protected area-level survey
       Both quantitative and qualitative information
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



             Selected qualitative responses
“Scenery is something else; Great park; Great; It was a magical “AWAHEE”; all
was on or beyond our expectations; Less mosquitoes! My next visit will be in a
month of August. (I love it here); Lovely spot; Nothing at all its beautiful thanks;
The sun was shining. Scenery was breathtaking. Water was warm enough to
swim in today; c’est beau; tout y est magnifique!; too many mosquitos at the
campsite; We had a perfect visit/experience.”
             Connections to “real”, “inspiring” and “memorable”, all emotional
               terms
             Experience → engagement?
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Pitfalls
           Nothing about visitor experiences except qualitative
            responses
           Agency capacity for analysis?
                 At the national office
                 At the protected area
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Ontario Parks' Visitor
  Survey (campers, day
  use and backcountry
  users)
Initiated in 1974, but
   recently delivered
   online
Potentials
       35,000+ cases
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



           Data on origins, park(s) visited, activities, experiences,
            expenditures and preferred management actions
           Weighted data available on a park by park basis
Pitfalls
           Analysis – limited capacity in Ontario Parks
           Direction – none for visitor experiences
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Social Media as Data
       Social media?
               Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Linkedin and so on
               Both Parks Canada and Ontario Parks use social media
                   e.g., Pukaskwa National Park
                   e.g., Ontario Parks
               Communication, promotion
                       Data capture
                       Parks and Protected Areas Research Group
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



“Listening” → towards “engagement” with visitors or
  potential visitors
       Social media analytics
       e.g., Meltwater
       e.g., Sentiment Metrics
       Qualitative data about what people are saying about
        a protected area
       From a wide variety of social media platforms
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Banff National Park
        Sentiments and Platforms
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Quetico Provincial Park
        Sentiment and Platforms
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Potentials
           Communicating AND listening
           Connecting AND engaging
           Agencies are involved in social media now
Pitfalls
           Numbers (Banff NP vs. Pukaskwa NP)
           Capacity, especially in Ontario Parks
           Cost, but relatively small when compared to social research
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Conclusions
   Potentials and pitfalls associated with all three possibilities for rapid
   assessment
           All are substitutes for quantitative and/or qualitative research
   Pitfalls related to agency capacity to understand visitors, especially at
   the protected area level
   Social media offers high potential for understanding visitors'
   experiences
           New, but engaging and unobtrusive
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Selected References
Cole, David N. and Daniel, Terry C., 2003. The science of visitor management in parks and protected areas: from verbal reports to simulation
       models. Journal for Nature Conservation, 11, (4), pp. 269–277.

Eagles, Paul, 2012. Budget implication of tourism finance of parks: Ontario Provincial Parks from 1996 to 2011. Paper presented at the 18 th
       International Symposium on Society and Natural Resources, Edmonton, Alberta, June.

Ervin, J. (2003). WWF: Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management (RAPPAM) Methodology. WWF, Gland,
        Switzerland.

Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N. and Courrau, J., 2006. Evaluating Effectiveness: A framework for assessing management
      effectiveness of protected areas. (2nd edition) IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. xiv + 105 pp.

Jurgens, P., 2012. Communities of communication: Making sense of the “social” in social media. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30.
       (3-4), pp. 186-203.

Mason, Peter, 2005. Visitor management in protected areas: From ‘hard’ to ‘soft’ approaches? Current Issues in Tourism, 8, (2-3), pp. 181-
      194.

Meltwater Buzz, 2013. Listening Module [online at http://buzz.meltwater.com/products/listen-module/].

Secretariat, Convention     on    Biological  Diversity,       (n.d.)   Protected     Areas    Management       Effectiveness    [online       at
http://www.cbd.int/protected-old/PAME.shtml].
Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management



Sentiment Metrics, 2010. Social Media Monitoring. [online at http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/social-media-monitoring-tools/social-
      media-monitoring.html].

University of Wisconsin – Extension, 2012. Program Development and Evaluation, [online at
       http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html].

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a Payne casiopa2013

Blickenderfer - Itasca Native Shoreland Buffer Incentives Program
Blickenderfer - Itasca Native Shoreland Buffer Incentives ProgramBlickenderfer - Itasca Native Shoreland Buffer Incentives Program
Blickenderfer - Itasca Native Shoreland Buffer Incentives Program
Environmental Initiative
 
Setting Standards for Sustainable Tourism: An analysis of US tourism certific...
Setting Standards for Sustainable Tourism: An analysis of US tourism certific...Setting Standards for Sustainable Tourism: An analysis of US tourism certific...
Setting Standards for Sustainable Tourism: An analysis of US tourism certific...
lisaposer
 
Research Agenda for Protected Areas in Northwestern Onatrio
Research Agenda for Protected Areas in Northwestern OnatrioResearch Agenda for Protected Areas in Northwestern Onatrio
Research Agenda for Protected Areas in Northwestern Onatrio
rjpayne
 
Stuart Phinn and Andy Lowe_TERN's national ecosystem data infrastructure is d...
Stuart Phinn and Andy Lowe_TERN's national ecosystem data infrastructure is d...Stuart Phinn and Andy Lowe_TERN's national ecosystem data infrastructure is d...
Stuart Phinn and Andy Lowe_TERN's national ecosystem data infrastructure is d...
TERN Australia
 
Dan Meden resume 2017
Dan Meden resume 2017Dan Meden resume 2017
Dan Meden resume 2017
Daniel Meden
 

Semelhante a Payne casiopa2013 (20)

CARIBSAVE: A Sectoral Approach to Vulnerability, resilience, and climate chan...
CARIBSAVE: A Sectoral Approach to Vulnerability, resilience, and climate chan...CARIBSAVE: A Sectoral Approach to Vulnerability, resilience, and climate chan...
CARIBSAVE: A Sectoral Approach to Vulnerability, resilience, and climate chan...
 
Emerging Research Areas in Sustainable Tourism Energies
Emerging Research Areas in Sustainable Tourism EnergiesEmerging Research Areas in Sustainable Tourism Energies
Emerging Research Areas in Sustainable Tourism Energies
 
DGS_CV_public
DGS_CV_publicDGS_CV_public
DGS_CV_public
 
CARIBSAVE: A sectoral approach to vulnerability, resilience and Climate Chang...
CARIBSAVE: A sectoral approach to vulnerability, resilience and Climate Chang...CARIBSAVE: A sectoral approach to vulnerability, resilience and Climate Chang...
CARIBSAVE: A sectoral approach to vulnerability, resilience and Climate Chang...
 
Blickenderfer - Itasca Native Shoreland Buffer Incentives Program
Blickenderfer - Itasca Native Shoreland Buffer Incentives ProgramBlickenderfer - Itasca Native Shoreland Buffer Incentives Program
Blickenderfer - Itasca Native Shoreland Buffer Incentives Program
 
Setting Standards for Sustainable Tourism: An analysis of US tourism certific...
Setting Standards for Sustainable Tourism: An analysis of US tourism certific...Setting Standards for Sustainable Tourism: An analysis of US tourism certific...
Setting Standards for Sustainable Tourism: An analysis of US tourism certific...
 
Socio economic analysis of tourist and recreational activities in Luis Peña
Socio economic analysis of tourist and recreational activities in Luis PeñaSocio economic analysis of tourist and recreational activities in Luis Peña
Socio economic analysis of tourist and recreational activities in Luis Peña
 
Transportation and Environmental Collaboration Initiative
Transportation and Environmental Collaboration InitiativeTransportation and Environmental Collaboration Initiative
Transportation and Environmental Collaboration Initiative
 
Research Agenda for Protected Areas in Northwestern Onatrio
Research Agenda for Protected Areas in Northwestern OnatrioResearch Agenda for Protected Areas in Northwestern Onatrio
Research Agenda for Protected Areas in Northwestern Onatrio
 
CEP Corbin - Promoting Information Management & Sharing within the Wider Cari...
CEP Corbin - Promoting Information Management & Sharing within the Wider Cari...CEP Corbin - Promoting Information Management & Sharing within the Wider Cari...
CEP Corbin - Promoting Information Management & Sharing within the Wider Cari...
 
Design of an Aesthetics Monitoring Program for the GBR
Design of an Aesthetics Monitoring Program for the GBRDesign of an Aesthetics Monitoring Program for the GBR
Design of an Aesthetics Monitoring Program for the GBR
 
2016 GMekong Forum - Session 03 - Prevent risks or manage consequences? Paul ...
2016 GMekong Forum - Session 03 - Prevent risks or manage consequences? Paul ...2016 GMekong Forum - Session 03 - Prevent risks or manage consequences? Paul ...
2016 GMekong Forum - Session 03 - Prevent risks or manage consequences? Paul ...
 
Asset Management presented at Tennessee APWA
Asset Management presented at Tennessee APWAAsset Management presented at Tennessee APWA
Asset Management presented at Tennessee APWA
 
Citizen climate connect pitch k baby nov 2019
Citizen climate connect  pitch k baby nov 2019  Citizen climate connect  pitch k baby nov 2019
Citizen climate connect pitch k baby nov 2019
 
TAPAS Group overview, Anna Spenceley
TAPAS Group overview, Anna SpenceleyTAPAS Group overview, Anna Spenceley
TAPAS Group overview, Anna Spenceley
 
Stuart Phinn and Andy Lowe_TERN's national ecosystem data infrastructure is d...
Stuart Phinn and Andy Lowe_TERN's national ecosystem data infrastructure is d...Stuart Phinn and Andy Lowe_TERN's national ecosystem data infrastructure is d...
Stuart Phinn and Andy Lowe_TERN's national ecosystem data infrastructure is d...
 
Dan Meden resume 2017
Dan Meden resume 2017Dan Meden resume 2017
Dan Meden resume 2017
 
Lake Erie Biodiversity Conservation Strategy
Lake Erie Biodiversity Conservation StrategyLake Erie Biodiversity Conservation Strategy
Lake Erie Biodiversity Conservation Strategy
 
EarthCheck White Paper - Water
EarthCheck White Paper - WaterEarthCheck White Paper - Water
EarthCheck White Paper - Water
 
Resume
ResumeResume
Resume
 

Mais de rjpayne

Mais de rjpayne (13)

Cycling and Sustainability: Two Wheels Good, Four Wheels Bad
Cycling and Sustainability: Two Wheels Good, Four Wheels BadCycling and Sustainability: Two Wheels Good, Four Wheels Bad
Cycling and Sustainability: Two Wheels Good, Four Wheels Bad
 
Establishing Canadian MPAs
Establishing Canadian MPAsEstablishing Canadian MPAs
Establishing Canadian MPAs
 
MPA Users
MPA UsersMPA Users
MPA Users
 
The Effectiveness of Management Planning in Ontario's Provincial Parks: A Hu...
The Effectiveness of Management Planning in Ontario's Provincial Parks:  A Hu...The Effectiveness of Management Planning in Ontario's Provincial Parks:  A Hu...
The Effectiveness of Management Planning in Ontario's Provincial Parks: A Hu...
 
Harming or Killing Snakes in Canada: Results of the National Survey, 2010
Harming or Killing Snakes in Canada: Results of the National Survey, 2010Harming or Killing Snakes in Canada: Results of the National Survey, 2010
Harming or Killing Snakes in Canada: Results of the National Survey, 2010
 
Tourism and Local Benefits in the Cayos Cochinos MPA, Honduras
Tourism and Local Benefits in the Cayos Cochinos MPA, HondurasTourism and Local Benefits in the Cayos Cochinos MPA, Honduras
Tourism and Local Benefits in the Cayos Cochinos MPA, Honduras
 
Managing Aboriginal Activities in the Cape Byron Marine Park, Australia
Managing Aboriginal Activities in the Cape Byron Marine Park, AustraliaManaging Aboriginal Activities in the Cape Byron Marine Park, Australia
Managing Aboriginal Activities in the Cape Byron Marine Park, Australia
 
Institutional Vacuity
Institutional VacuityInstitutional Vacuity
Institutional Vacuity
 
Casiopa 2009
Casiopa 2009Casiopa 2009
Casiopa 2009
 
Understanding Intentional Harm to Snakes and Turtles: A Focus Group Approach
Understanding Intentional Harm to Snakes and Turtles: A Focus Group ApproachUnderstanding Intentional Harm to Snakes and Turtles: A Focus Group Approach
Understanding Intentional Harm to Snakes and Turtles: A Focus Group Approach
 
Recreational Fishers And MPAs
Recreational Fishers And MPAsRecreational Fishers And MPAs
Recreational Fishers And MPAs
 
Mis Management Of The Coastal Zone
Mis Management Of The Coastal ZoneMis Management Of The Coastal Zone
Mis Management Of The Coastal Zone
 
Towards A Human Dimensions Research Agenda For Parks
Towards A Human Dimensions Research Agenda For ParksTowards A Human Dimensions Research Agenda For Parks
Towards A Human Dimensions Research Agenda For Parks
 

Payne casiopa2013

  • 1. The Potentials and Pitfalls of Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management R.J. Payne Lakehead University Transforming Visitor Management - Improving the Understanding of Protected Area Clientele with Declining Resources Centre for Applied Science in Ontario Protected Areas (CASIOPA) Annual Meeting Toronto, Ontario January 31 – February 1, 2013
  • 2. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Introduction Context Parks Canada Ontario Parks Terms Assessment Visitor Management
  • 3. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Rapid Assessments Visitor Impacts on Parks and Protected Areas Parks Canada's Visitor Activity Profiles Potentials and Pitfalls Visitor Experiences in Parks and Protected Areas Existing Data Sources in Parks Canada and Ontario Parks Potentials and Pitfalls Social Media as Data Potentials and Pitfalls
  • 4. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Conclusions
  • 5. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Context Science-based decision-making and evaluation is better than alternatives Parks Canada National Parks Ecological integrity – first consideration Then, education and visitor experiences NMCAs Ecological sustainability, commemorative integrity and visitor experiences
  • 6. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Socio-political Pressures Generate more revenue Science under siege Visitor Management Capacity Reduced: 2/3 of social scientists cut, service centres eliminated Direction: Real, inspiring, memorable experiences Oversight Auditor-General of Canada (Commissioner for Environment and Sustainable Development)
  • 7. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Ontario Parks Provincial Parks Wilderness, natural environment classes → ecological integrity Waterway, nature reserve and recreation: not clear if ecological integrity is the primary objective Non-operating parks, not managed Conservation Reserves Beyond designation, not managed
  • 8. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Socio-political Pressures 86% of operating budget from tourism-related revenues (Eagles, 2012) Fiscal restraint Visitor Management Capacity Limited Direction: none Oversight Auditor-General of Ontario Environmental Commissioner of Ontario
  • 9. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Terms Assessment = Evaluation The Management Effectiveness Initiative (WCPA) The Green List (WCPA) Source: Hockings et al., 2006
  • 10. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Source: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html
  • 11. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Visitor Management Definition: Visitor management is the practice of ensuring that the visitor achieves a quality experience in an environmentally sustainable manner. Outputs: communication, interpretation, safety and enforcement Outcomes: visitor impacts on natural environments visitor experiences WCPA work focuses on outputs rather than outcomes
  • 12. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Rapid Assessments Visitor Impacts on Parks and Protected Areas Parks Canada's Visitor Activity Profiles Legislation/policy basis Identify socio-demographic characteristics, servicing requirements and environmental impacts of activities Existing knowledge Afford designation of “appropriate activities” based in part on environmental impacts
  • 13. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management An example: Hang Gliding Deemed inappropriate Likely environmental impacts related to servicing the activity Parking, roads, vegetation removal Experiences PA related?
  • 14. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Potentials Existing information and knowledge Supports ecological integrity part of mandate Relatively quick Pitfalls Appropriateness has been contested If appropriate, no determination of how much of the activity Activities are diverse (e.g., X-C skiing) and can change If ecological integrity is NOT a management goal?
  • 15. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Visitor Experiences in Parks and Protected Areas Existing Data Sources in Parks Canada and Ontario Parks Parks Canada's “Visitor Information Program” Pukaskwa 2006, 214 of 385 randomly selected parties
  • 16. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Frontcountry visitors Purpose: to gather information on the demographic characteristics of visitors, to determine the visitor’s level of satisfaction with services and facilities at the site, to determine the level of participation and satisfaction with interpretive programs and activities, to determine the level of understanding of the site’s key messages, and to understand more about the visitor’s trip to Pukaskwa National Park. Potentials Regular, randomized, protected area-level survey Both quantitative and qualitative information
  • 17. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Selected qualitative responses “Scenery is something else; Great park; Great; It was a magical “AWAHEE”; all was on or beyond our expectations; Less mosquitoes! My next visit will be in a month of August. (I love it here); Lovely spot; Nothing at all its beautiful thanks; The sun was shining. Scenery was breathtaking. Water was warm enough to swim in today; c’est beau; tout y est magnifique!; too many mosquitos at the campsite; We had a perfect visit/experience.” Connections to “real”, “inspiring” and “memorable”, all emotional terms Experience → engagement?
  • 18. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Pitfalls Nothing about visitor experiences except qualitative responses Agency capacity for analysis? At the national office At the protected area
  • 19. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Ontario Parks' Visitor Survey (campers, day use and backcountry users) Initiated in 1974, but recently delivered online Potentials 35,000+ cases
  • 20. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Data on origins, park(s) visited, activities, experiences, expenditures and preferred management actions Weighted data available on a park by park basis Pitfalls Analysis – limited capacity in Ontario Parks Direction – none for visitor experiences
  • 21. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Social Media as Data Social media? Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Linkedin and so on Both Parks Canada and Ontario Parks use social media e.g., Pukaskwa National Park e.g., Ontario Parks Communication, promotion Data capture Parks and Protected Areas Research Group
  • 22. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management “Listening” → towards “engagement” with visitors or potential visitors Social media analytics e.g., Meltwater e.g., Sentiment Metrics Qualitative data about what people are saying about a protected area From a wide variety of social media platforms
  • 23. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Banff National Park Sentiments and Platforms
  • 24. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Quetico Provincial Park Sentiment and Platforms
  • 25. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Potentials Communicating AND listening Connecting AND engaging Agencies are involved in social media now Pitfalls Numbers (Banff NP vs. Pukaskwa NP) Capacity, especially in Ontario Parks Cost, but relatively small when compared to social research
  • 26. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Conclusions Potentials and pitfalls associated with all three possibilities for rapid assessment All are substitutes for quantitative and/or qualitative research Pitfalls related to agency capacity to understand visitors, especially at the protected area level Social media offers high potential for understanding visitors' experiences New, but engaging and unobtrusive
  • 27. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Selected References Cole, David N. and Daniel, Terry C., 2003. The science of visitor management in parks and protected areas: from verbal reports to simulation models. Journal for Nature Conservation, 11, (4), pp. 269–277. Eagles, Paul, 2012. Budget implication of tourism finance of parks: Ontario Provincial Parks from 1996 to 2011. Paper presented at the 18 th International Symposium on Society and Natural Resources, Edmonton, Alberta, June. Ervin, J. (2003). WWF: Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management (RAPPAM) Methodology. WWF, Gland, Switzerland. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N. and Courrau, J., 2006. Evaluating Effectiveness: A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. (2nd edition) IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. xiv + 105 pp. Jurgens, P., 2012. Communities of communication: Making sense of the “social” in social media. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30. (3-4), pp. 186-203. Mason, Peter, 2005. Visitor management in protected areas: From ‘hard’ to ‘soft’ approaches? Current Issues in Tourism, 8, (2-3), pp. 181- 194. Meltwater Buzz, 2013. Listening Module [online at http://buzz.meltwater.com/products/listen-module/]. Secretariat, Convention on Biological Diversity, (n.d.) Protected Areas Management Effectiveness [online at http://www.cbd.int/protected-old/PAME.shtml].
  • 28. Rapid Assessments for Visitor Management Sentiment Metrics, 2010. Social Media Monitoring. [online at http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/social-media-monitoring-tools/social- media-monitoring.html]. University of Wisconsin – Extension, 2012. Program Development and Evaluation, [online at http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html].