1) The document discusses mobile tagging, which involves using a mobile device's camera to scan barcodes or tags containing URLs or other data.
2) Mobile tagging has seen widespread adoption in Japan due to factors like high camera quality on phones and flat data rates, but faces barriers to adoption in the US like fragmented tag standards and lack of carrier support.
3) Recent developments that may help advance mobile tagging include efforts by the CTIA and OMA to standardize approaches, and more phones integrating barcode scanning software.
2. Biography
With Intel for 10 years
Enterprise Architect (i.e.: city planner for a system)
Versed in CDNs, digital signage, marketing metrics,
content systems, portals, security patterns, integration
patterns, SOA, enterprise mash-ups, open source,
application hosting, data centers, etc.
Mobile enthusiast
Hobbies:
Backpacking/hiking, Kayaking, FIRST Robotics
2 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
3. The Disclaimers
The content in this presentation represents my personal opinion and although I
am an employee of Intel Corporation, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of
Intel on this matter.
I believe that innovative companies will come out of the current economic funk
much stronger.
The issues presented and questions raised in this presentation have been are
painstakingly researched and I have even made an attempt to get my answers
correct. People who are sticklers for the truth should rely on their own research.
The opinions in this presentation are well reasoned and insightful, however, they
are not the opinions of Intel, Intel’s Information Technology group or their
lackeys. Anyone who says otherwise is itching for a fight.
All other trademarks mentioned in this presentation are the property of their
respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply a partnership
relationship between myself and any other company.
3 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
4. What is Mobile Tagging?
Reading a 1D- or 2D-barcode by using a camera in a
mobile device
Various data types can be stored in the codes, although
for mobile tagging predominantly urls are ciphered
After decoding these codes, the user can be directly
linked to the corresponding website
Definition and graphic from Wikipedia
4 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
5. Photo board
5 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
6. ISO Standards Tag Technologies
QR Code Datamatrix Aztec
“The good thing about standards is that
there are so many to choose from.”
6 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
7. Proprietary Tag Technologies
Microsoft
ColorZip Shotcode
BeeTag
EZ Code
Tag
and many, many more…
7 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
8. Practical limitations
The Declaration of Independence (7990 characters)
8 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
9. Case Studies
Japan
42% use QR Codes
Encoding standardized in 2000
Introduced to mobiles in 2002
Wide-spread use by 2005
Mega-pixel cameras
Flat rate data plans (80% mobile broadband)
Germany (2008)
Linkbox provides information about landmarks & public schedules
Case Western Study (2008)
First US Trial
Partnership between all US carriers and Mobile Discover (ScanBuy)
City of Manor, Texas
Accessing city / public information
9 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
10. Barriers
Mobile Broadband adoption rates
Carrier buy-in
Readers pre-installed on phones
No standard Tag technology
Fragmentation due to Patent infringement
QR Codes, Datamatrix are de facto standards
10 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
11. Implementation Models
Direct Indirect
A code that contains either A code that contains an identifier.
The identifier has to be resolved
1. content for direct consumption
in order to access the identified
for the handset
content or service.
2. the address of the service to be
Register
accessed
Tag
Generate
Mgmt
Service
Create
Resolve
Scan Scan
Fetch
Decode Decode
11 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
12. Recent Developments
Open Mobile Alliance white paper
CTIA establishes code scan action team
Camera‐Phone based barcode scanning white paper outlines approach
Selecting standards & common approach for indirect codes
Support both EZ Code & Data Matrix
Plans to build an indirect resolution service in 2009
Google
Extending ad business into print
Including QR Code generation into APIs
Experimenting with YouTube & other services
Microsoft Tag launched at CES 2009
Mobile World Congress 2009
European leader MTag announced plans to enter US Market
US Patent Office awards NeoMedia amended patent on February 20, 2009
Key Driver is the growth of the Mobile Advertising Market
12 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
13. Indirect Tag Resolution Service/ Clearing House
13 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
From CTIA Camera‐Phone based barcode scanning White paper
14. Recent Handset Adoptions
ScanLife/ScanBuy coming pre-installed
Samsung (#3) announced in 2008. Unknown number
LG (#4) Europe soon, with US models to follow
Sprint’s announced plans
Nokia installing QR & Datamatrix code readers
14 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
15. Risks:
No Tag Trust / Tag Seal
Print vs. public signage
Malicious potential
Link masks unknown resource
Some readers prompt, others don’t
Privacy
Variable Data Printing
Public Perception
15 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
16. Futures
Signed/Trusted Barcodes
Images with embedded color bar codes
Mobile payment systems
16 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
17. References / Resources
Open Mobile Alliance
http://preview.tinyurl.com/OMA-Mobile-Codes
CITA Code Scan White Paper
http://preview.tinyurl.com/CTIA-Code-Scan
ABC News: Ahead of the Curve
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/AheadoftheCurve/story?id=6915825
Nokia Code Generation Site
http://mobilecodes.nokia.com
EFF : Patent Office to Reissue Narrowed Version of
NeoMedia Patent
http://preview.tinyurl.com/EFF-NeoMedia-6-199-048
17 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
18. Thank You!
Paul Dockter
www.linkedin.com/in/pdockter
18 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09
19. Mobile data and communications activities
(among those who have a cell phone or personal data assistant)
% of cell/PDA users who % of cell/PDA who do
have ever done this this on typical day
Send or receive text messages 58% 31%
Take a picture 58 15
Play a game 27 8
Send or receive email 19 8
Access the internet for news, weather, 19 7
sports, or other Information
Record a video 18 3
Play music 17 7
Send or receive instant messages 17 6
Get a map or directions to another location 14 3
Watch video 10 3
Source: Pew Internet & American Life Project Survey, December 2007, n=1,704 for those with cell phones or PDAs.. Margin of error is
+/- 3 points.
19 Mobile Tagging: Bridging the Gap Feb-09