Learning technologiesand dyslexic studentsat third level
1. Learning technologies
and dyslexic students
at third level
Pauline Rooney
Fourth Annual Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,
National University of Ireland Galway, June 2006.
2. Definitions: dyslexia
A combination of abilities and difficulties
that affect the learning process in one or
more of reading, spelling and writing.
Accompanying weaknesses may exist in
•
•
•
•
•
•
speed of processing
short-term memory
sequencing/organisation
auditory/visual perception
spoken language
motor skills
3. Definitions: learning
technologies
The use of information and
communication technologies (ICTs) to
enhance teaching and learning
Related terms:
•
•
•
•
eLearning
Educational technologies
Computer-based learning
Online learning
4. Background (1)
Professional context:
• Support lecturers in use of ICTs to
enhance teaching and learning
• Liaise with student support staff to
enhance student experience through
use of ICTs
• Develop accessible elearning materials
5. Background (2)
Institutional context:
• Dyslexic students constitute largest
percentage of disabled students
• Numbers of dyslexic students increasing
annually
Registered disabled undergraduate students at DIT
Deaf and Hard of
Hearing
5%
Mental Health
Difficulties
4%
Other Disabilities
8%
Blind and Visual
Impairment
2%
Physical and
Mobility Disability
4%
Specific Learning
Difficulty
77%
6. Background (3)
Educational context:
• Traditional teaching/assessment
methods present barriers to dyslexic
students
• Can learning technologies be used to
overcome these barriers? Little research
in area to-date
7. Research questions
What types of barriers to learning are
dyslexic students currently experiencing at
third level?
How are learning technologies currently
being used to support dyslexic students at
third level?
Can learning technologies be used to help
overcome these barriers? If so, how?
8. Methodology
Critical action research
Focus group of 8-12 students on one
programme
Collaborate with 1 lecturer on one module
9. Participants’ profiles
8 male students
1st, 2nd and 3rd years
Programmes:
• Ord degree Electrical Services Engineering
• Hons degree Business Management
Severity of dyslexia (as described by
students): 5 mild, 1 very mild, 2 moderate
11. Support mechanisms currently
used
MS software (100%)
Assistive technologies (50%)
Learning support tutor in disability services
(37.5%)
Friends (25%)
Lecturers (12.5%)
Parents (12.5%)
Counsellors (0%)
12. Current use of technologies (1)
Frequency of PC usage
• Every day – 87.5%
• Every second day – 12.5%
All have access to PCs at home and
college
75% use a laptop
50% use an iPOD or similar
All use a mobile phone
13. Current use of technologies (2)
eMail usage – 100%
• Every day – 25%
• 3 > times/wk – 25%
• < 3 times/wk – 50%
Preferred communication method with
lecturers
• Email - 75%
• Text messaging - 25%
Bebo homepage (www.bebo.com) – 50%
14. Experience of elearning (1)
100% using webct
87.5% using webct areas which provide
access to programme materials including:
• Lecture notes
• Discussion boards / email
• Animations/imagery
• Past exam papers
• Online quizzes
15. Experience of elearning (2)
62.5% using webct student support areas
• Study skills and exam tips
• Careers
• Student Maths Learning Centre
• 24 Hour Library
16. Student feedback (1)
100% wanted to see webct/elearning used more
• All lecturers using it
• More consistency in provision of materials
Most useful aspect - accessing course notes/materials
online
Use as reference in class
No need to approach lecturer
Helps with organisation
Least useful aspects - discussion boards
Spelling mistakes
Time consuming
17. Student feedback (2)
What learning technologies would they like to
see lecturers using?
Online calendar
Past exam papers
More imagery
Online flash cards
Online self-tests
Podcasts
Text messaging
18. Possibilities for future support?
Voice tools for communication
Podcastings
Text messaging (m-learning)
Use of multi-sensory
elearning materials
Gaming
19. Future research…..
Very difficult to conduct research in area
• Difficulties accessing students
• Most lecturers encountered were
reluctant to participate
• Practical difficulties meeting students
Research will resume in future I hope!