SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 74
Cervical Anatomy


Biomechanically Specialized
 Support of “large” Cranial mass
 Large range of motion
○ Flexion/extension
○ Axial rotation



Unique osteological characteristics
C1 - Atlas
No body
 2 articular pillars


 Flat articular surface
 Vertebral artery

foramen


2 arches
 Anterior
 Posterior
○ Vertebral artery groove
C2 Anatomy


Dens
 Embriological C1 body
 Base poorly vascularized
 Osteoporotic




Flat C1-2 joints
Vertebral artery
foramena
 Inferomedial to

superolateral
Anatomy – The Ligaments



Allow for the wide ROM of upper C-spine while
maintaining stability
Classified according to location with respect to
vertebral canal
 Internal:
○ Tectorial membrane
○ Cruciate ligament – including transverse ligament
○ Alar and apical ligaments
 External
○ Anterior and posterior atlanto-occipital membranes
○ Anterior and posterior atlanto-axial membranes
○ Articular capsules and ligamentum nuchae
AtlantoAxial Anatomy
Tectorial Membrane
AtlantoAxial Anatomy
Tranverse Ligament
occiput

C1-C2 joint

C1
C2

Alar Ligament
AtlantoAxial Anatomy

Facet for
Occipital
Condyle

Transverse
Ligament
AtlantoAxial Anatomy

Vertebral
Artery
APPROACH TO C-SPINE
INJURIES


Following trauma or complaint of neck pain
 Obtain lateral
 AP, and
 odontoid views
 The lateral view is only adequate if T1 can be
visualized



If there is any doubt of fracture or prevertebral
swelling , obtain oblique views and consider CT
All patients with sign/symptoms of cord injury require
MRI


Cervical Views

Odontoid
AP
Swimmer’s View
LATERAL VIEW









1. Anterior vertebral line (anterior
margin of vertebral bodies)
2. Posterior vertebral line
(posterior margin of vertebral
bodies)
3.Articular pillar (where superior
and inferior articular processes of
cervical vertebrae have fused on
either or both sides)
4. Spinolaminar line (posterior
margin of spinal canal)
5. Posterior spinous line (tips of
the spinous processes)
C1-C2


Predental space

(distance between posterior
aspect of anterior arch of C1
and anterior aspect of
odontoid process )


should be< 3mm In adult
and less <5mm in children
Or less
 ring sign of C2
C3-C7


Anterior spinal, posterior spinal and
spinolaminar lines: should be
smooth lines



Disc Spaces should be approximately same
anterior narrowing = flexion injury.
Widening = extension injury



Facet joints should be parallel

Interspinous distance should
decrease from C3 to C7
 Transverse process of C7 points downward and
T1 UPWARDS


INTERVERT
EBRAL
DISC

SPACE
S


Prevertebral Soft
Tissue


Nasopharyngeal space (C1) - 10
mm (adult)



Retropharyngeal spaceC 2-C4 (
between posterior pharyngeal wall
and anterior border of vertebrae).

10m
m



5mm

Retro tracheal space C5-7 (space
between posterior tracheal wall and
anterior inferior body C6 )
c3-4 5mm from vertebral body is normal
C4-7 20mm from vertebral body is normal
22mm
AP View


The height of the cervical
vertebral bodies should
be approximately equal



The height of each joint
space should be roughly
equal at all levels.



Spinous process should
be in midline and in good
alignment.
Odontoid View
An adequate film should include the
entire odontoid and the lateral
borders of C1-C2.
Occipital condyles should line up with
the lateral masses and superior
articular facet of C1.
The distance from the dens to the
lateral masses of C1 should be equal
bilaterally.

The tips of lateral mass of C1 should
line up with the lateral margins of the
superior articular facet of C2.
The odontoid should have
uninterrupted cortical margins
blending with the body of C2.
Classification of
Fractures of c-spine


HYPERFLEXION INJURIES









Hyper extention injuries








Hangman fracture
Extention teardrop fracture
laminar fracture
Pillar fracture
Posterior arch of c1 fracture

FRACTURE DUE TO AXIAL LOADING





Flexion teardrop fracture
Hyper flexion Strain
Wedge Compression fracture
Bilateral facet Lock
Unilateral facet dislocation
Clay-shoveler’s fracture

Jefferson fracture
Burst fracture

OTHER INJURIES



Odontoid fracture
Rotational Injuries
Hyperflexion
 Distraction creates

tensile forces in
posterior column
 Can result in
compression of
body (anterior
column)
 Most commonly
results from MVC
and falls
Compression
 Result from axial

loading
 Commonly from
diving, football,
MVA
 Injury pattern
depends on initial
head position
 May create burst,
wedge or
compression fx’s
Hyperextension
 Impaction of posterior

arches and facet
compression causing many
types of fx’s
○ lamina

○ spinous processes
○ pedicles
 With distraction get

disruption of ALL
 Evaluate carefully for
stability
 LOOK FOR CENTRAL
CORD SYNDROME
Types of Injuries
Flexion Teardrop Fracture C5-6
fracture is the result of a combination
of flexion and compression ,most commonly at C5-6
 The teardrop fragment comes from the
anteroinferior aspect of the vertebral body. The
larger posterior part of the vertebral body
is displaced backward into the spinal canal.


Best seen on lateral view
 It is an completely unstable fracture associated with
complete disruption of ligaments and anterior cord
syndrome and quadriplegia
 70% of patients have neurologic deficit.

common in MOTOR VECHICLE ACCIDENT

Signs:
Prevertebral swelling
associated with anterior
longitudinal ligament tear.
Teardrop fragment from
anterior vertebral body
avulsion fracture.
Posterior vertebral body
subluxation into the spinal
canal.
Spinal cord compression
from vertebral body
displacement.
Fracture of the spinous
process.
Fracture of
the spinous
process of
C4

Fracture of the body
of c5 with a small
fragment

anteriorly

Acute angulation at the level of C5C6
with displacement of C5 in posterior
direction
Wedge fracture
 Compression

fracture resulting from

flexion.
Flexion compression injury
 Best seen on lateral view
 Stable
 Common in
 Elderly patients
with osteoporosis or osteogenesis
imperfecta

Wedge shape
vertebra

Antersuperio
r body
fracture
Hangman’s Fracture C-2


Fx through the pars
interarticularis of C2
secondary to
hyperextension



Best seen on lateral
view
Hyperextention injury
Stable fracture ?







The most common scenario
would be
 frontal motor
vehicle(hitting dash
board)
 Hanging
 falls,
 diving injuries
 contact sports.
Neurological involvement is
rare


Classification of Hangman' s fractures



Type I (65%)
 hair-line fracture
 C2-3 disc normal
Type II (28%)
 displaced C2
 disrupted C2-3 disc
 ligamentous rupture with
instability
 C3 anterosuperior compression
fracture
Type III (7%)
 displaced C2
 C2-3 Bilateral interfacet dislocation
 Severe instability




TYPE 1 HANGMAN FRACTURE
There is a hair-line fracture and there is no displacement.
C23 NORMAL


HANGMAN FRACTURE
TYPE 3

Prevertebral soft
tissue swelling

Anterior
dislocation of the
C2 vertebral body

BILATRAL C2 pars
interarticularis
fractures.


The CT-images
confirm the
fracture-lines of
the hangman's
fracture.
They run
through the
pars
interarticularis
resulting in a
traumatic
spondylolysis.
In this case
there was no
neurologic
deficit, because
the spinal canal
is widened at
the level of the
fracture.
Extention tear drop fracture
AVULSION FRACTURE of anterio inferior content
of the axis resulting from hyperextention
 This injury is






stable in flexion
but highly unstable in extension.

common in diving accidents
 It also may be associated with the central cord
syndrome .

bony
fragment.
This fragment
is a true
avulsion, in
contrast to the
flexion teardrop
fracture in
which the
fragment is
produced by
compression of
the anterior
vertebral
aspect due to
hyperflexion.
Jefferson Fracture C-1
Fracture is caused by a compressive
downward force that is transmitted evenly
through the occipital condyles to the superior
articular surfaces of the lateral masses of C1.
This process displaces the masses laterally and
causes fractures of the anterior and posterior
arches, along with possible disruption of the
transverse ligament.

•
•
•
•

Best seen on odontoid view
Unstable fracture
Fracture due to AXIAL LOADING
frequently associated with
•
diving into shallow water(axial
•
•

blow to the vertex of the head )

impact against the roof of a vehicle
fall from playground equipments
SIGNS ON XRAY:
Displacement of the
lateral masses of
vertebrae C1 beyond the
margins of the body of
vertebra C2.
<2mm bilateral is always
abnormal
<1-2 mm or unilateral
displacement can be due
to head rotation
CT is required to
1. define the extent of fracture
2. detecting fragment in spinal cord
BURST FRACTURE C3-7







Same mechanism as jefferson fracture i.e axial compression
but
Located at c3-7
Stable fracture
The intervertebral disc is driven into the vertebral body below.
Posterior fragments dislocation common
Require ct for fracture evaluation and bone fragment in spinal
cord
Odontoid Fracture C2


Fracture of the odontoid (dens) of C2
 3 categories, I-III



Best seen on open-mouth odontoid view or lateral radiograph
result from blunt trauma to head leading to cervical hyperflexion or
hyperextension
Unstable fracture
Occur in both elderly and young patients
75% cases are children





Classification

Type I: Avulsion of the tip of
the dens where it is attached
to C1.
This is a rare fracture.
It is potentially stable.?
Type II: Through the base of
the dens.
Most common fracture.
Always unstable and poor
healing.
Type III: Fracture through the
body of the axis and
sometimes facets.
Can be unstable, but has a
better prognosis than type II
due to better healing of the
fracture which runs through
the metaphyseal body of C-2
Type 1 odontoid fracture
Type II
Type III
CT IMAGE
DENS

Dens
The image through the lateral part of C2 nicely shows, that the fracture runs
through the body of C2, i.e. a type III odontoid fracture.
The posterior dura is in a normal position, but the anterior dura is displaced
(arrow).
Showing Central location of spinal cord injury
Clay Shoveler’s Fracture
Oblique avulsion fracture of a spinous process C6-T1
 C7>C6>T1










Best seen on lateral view
Powerful Hyperflexion injury(shoveling)
Stable fracture
Common in
motor vehicle accidents
sudden muscle contraction
direct blows to the spine
Ap view show ghost sign with 2 spinous processes ???
Case 1
5 yo girl
 Hit by car while
riding bike
 VSA at scene
 Vitals recovered
by EMS


Rose et al, Am J Surg 2003;185(4)
Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation







2.5 x more common in
children than adults
Due to small occipital
condyles and horizontal
atlanto-occipital joints
Suspect if distance
between occipital
condyles and C1 is
> 5mm at any point
Usually have ++ soft
tissue swelling
OccipitoAtlantal Dissociation (OAD)
Commonly Fatal
Present 6-20% of post mortem studies
– Alker et al, 1978
– Bucholz & Burkhead,1979
– Adams et al, 1992

50% missed injury rate
1/3 Neurological Worsening
– Davis et al, 1993
OccipitoAtlantal Dissociation (OAD)
Symptoms/Findings
– Wallenberg Syndrome
Lower Cranial nerve deficits
Horner’s syndrome
Cerebellar ataxia
Cruciate paralysis
Contralateral loss of pain and
temperature
Radiographic Lines
Powers’ Ratio


BC/OA
 >1 considered abnormal





Limited Usefulness
Positive only in Anterior
Translational injuries
False Negative with pure
distraction

Powers et al, Neurosurg, 1979
QUESTIONS
REFERRENCES
Text Book of Radiology and imaging
(DAVID SUTTON)
 Primer of Diagnostic Imaging
 Radiology Review Manual(Dahnert)

Thank You!

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries
Subaxial Cervical Spine InjuriesSubaxial Cervical Spine Injuries
Subaxial Cervical Spine InjuriesSumit2018
 
THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES
THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIESTHORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES
THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIESSuman Subedi
 
Spinal Trauma (Spinal Cord Injury)
Spinal Trauma (Spinal Cord Injury)Spinal Trauma (Spinal Cord Injury)
Spinal Trauma (Spinal Cord Injury)Abdullah Mohammad
 
Spinal cord injuries | spine fracture | thoracolumbar fracture | colorado spi...
Spinal cord injuries | spine fracture | thoracolumbar fracture | colorado spi...Spinal cord injuries | spine fracture | thoracolumbar fracture | colorado spi...
Spinal cord injuries | spine fracture | thoracolumbar fracture | colorado spi...Dr. Donald Corenman, M.D., D.C.
 
Cervical spine injuries and its management
Cervical spine injuries and its managementCervical spine injuries and its management
Cervical spine injuries and its managementPrashanth Kumar
 
Pedicle screw by professor shah alam
Pedicle screw by professor shah alamPedicle screw by professor shah alam
Pedicle screw by professor shah alamwasek_bd
 
Thoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
Thoraco Lumbar Spine InjuryThoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
Thoraco Lumbar Spine InjuryKevin Ambadan
 
Odontoid and hangman fracture
Odontoid and hangman fractureOdontoid and hangman fracture
Odontoid and hangman fractureDikpal Singh
 
Basilar invagination
Basilar invaginationBasilar invagination
Basilar invaginationVijay Loya
 
Upper C-spine Fractures Azam Basheer
Upper C-spine Fractures Azam BasheerUpper C-spine Fractures Azam Basheer
Upper C-spine Fractures Azam BasheerAzam Basheer
 
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical TraumaBajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical TraumaSohail Bajammal
 

Mais procurados (20)

Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries
Subaxial Cervical Spine InjuriesSubaxial Cervical Spine Injuries
Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries
 
THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES
THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIESTHORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES
THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES
 
C1 C2 fractures
C1 C2 fracturesC1 C2 fractures
C1 C2 fractures
 
Spinal Trauma (Spinal Cord Injury)
Spinal Trauma (Spinal Cord Injury)Spinal Trauma (Spinal Cord Injury)
Spinal Trauma (Spinal Cord Injury)
 
Spinal cord injuries | spine fracture | thoracolumbar fracture | colorado spi...
Spinal cord injuries | spine fracture | thoracolumbar fracture | colorado spi...Spinal cord injuries | spine fracture | thoracolumbar fracture | colorado spi...
Spinal cord injuries | spine fracture | thoracolumbar fracture | colorado spi...
 
Cervical spine trauma
Cervical spine traumaCervical spine trauma
Cervical spine trauma
 
Cervical spine injuries and its management
Cervical spine injuries and its managementCervical spine injuries and its management
Cervical spine injuries and its management
 
Scoliosis seminar
Scoliosis seminarScoliosis seminar
Scoliosis seminar
 
Pedicle screw by professor shah alam
Pedicle screw by professor shah alamPedicle screw by professor shah alam
Pedicle screw by professor shah alam
 
Acetabulum fracture
Acetabulum fractureAcetabulum fracture
Acetabulum fracture
 
Thoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
Thoraco Lumbar Spine InjuryThoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
Thoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
 
Odontoid and hangman fracture
Odontoid and hangman fractureOdontoid and hangman fracture
Odontoid and hangman fracture
 
Lateral mass screws
Lateral mass screwsLateral mass screws
Lateral mass screws
 
Spinal balance
Spinal balanceSpinal balance
Spinal balance
 
Spine injury
Spine injurySpine injury
Spine injury
 
Basilar invagination
Basilar invaginationBasilar invagination
Basilar invagination
 
319 thoracolumbar trauma
319 thoracolumbar trauma319 thoracolumbar trauma
319 thoracolumbar trauma
 
Subaxial spine
Subaxial spineSubaxial spine
Subaxial spine
 
Upper C-spine Fractures Azam Basheer
Upper C-spine Fractures Azam BasheerUpper C-spine Fractures Azam Basheer
Upper C-spine Fractures Azam Basheer
 
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical TraumaBajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
 

Semelhante a Cervical spine fractures muhamma

C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture PresentationC2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture PresentationAnas Ahmed
 
Cervical spine trauma asif.pptx
Cervical spine trauma asif.pptxCervical spine trauma asif.pptx
Cervical spine trauma asif.pptxAsifAliJatoi2
 
pinal cord injury.ppt
pinal cord injury.pptpinal cord injury.ppt
pinal cord injury.pptAsgraf
 
Spine injury -halim.pptx
Spine injury -halim.pptxSpine injury -halim.pptx
Spine injury -halim.pptxezrys54ety5
 
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdleFracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdleomar ababneh
 
Cervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial Trauma
Cervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial TraumaCervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial Trauma
Cervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial TraumaHimanshu Soni
 
Spinal trauma IMAGING
Spinal trauma  IMAGINGSpinal trauma  IMAGING
Spinal trauma IMAGINGSanal Kumar
 
Cervical Spine Injury.pptx
Cervical Spine Injury.pptxCervical Spine Injury.pptx
Cervical Spine Injury.pptxAbrahamEmes
 
Final final madhu sir
Final final  madhu sirFinal final  madhu sir
Final final madhu sirvaruntandra
 
Fracture neck of femur
Fracture neck of  femurFracture neck of  femur
Fracture neck of femurPrateek Singh
 
Fracture around elbow.pptx
Fracture around elbow.pptxFracture around elbow.pptx
Fracture around elbow.pptxReza Hambali
 

Semelhante a Cervical spine fractures muhamma (20)

C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture PresentationC2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
 
SCI ABDALLAH.ppt
SCI ABDALLAH.pptSCI ABDALLAH.ppt
SCI ABDALLAH.ppt
 
Cervical trauma
Cervical traumaCervical trauma
Cervical trauma
 
Spinal injury
Spinal injurySpinal injury
Spinal injury
 
C_SPINE.pptx
C_SPINE.pptxC_SPINE.pptx
C_SPINE.pptx
 
Dr Harshil radio spine
Dr Harshil radio spineDr Harshil radio spine
Dr Harshil radio spine
 
spinal cord injury
 spinal cord injury spinal cord injury
spinal cord injury
 
Cervical spine trauma asif.pptx
Cervical spine trauma asif.pptxCervical spine trauma asif.pptx
Cervical spine trauma asif.pptx
 
pinal cord injury.ppt
pinal cord injury.pptpinal cord injury.ppt
pinal cord injury.ppt
 
Spine injury -halim.pptx
Spine injury -halim.pptxSpine injury -halim.pptx
Spine injury -halim.pptx
 
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdleFracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
 
Cervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial Trauma
Cervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial TraumaCervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial Trauma
Cervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial Trauma
 
Spinal trauma IMAGING
Spinal trauma  IMAGINGSpinal trauma  IMAGING
Spinal trauma IMAGING
 
Cervical Spine Injury.pptx
Cervical Spine Injury.pptxCervical Spine Injury.pptx
Cervical Spine Injury.pptx
 
Condylar fractures
Condylar fracturesCondylar fractures
Condylar fractures
 
CT Cervical Spine
CT Cervical SpineCT Cervical Spine
CT Cervical Spine
 
Final final madhu sir
Final final  madhu sirFinal final  madhu sir
Final final madhu sir
 
Fracture neck of femur
Fracture neck of  femurFracture neck of  femur
Fracture neck of femur
 
Fracture around elbow.pptx
Fracture around elbow.pptxFracture around elbow.pptx
Fracture around elbow.pptx
 
Atlantoaxial injuries
Atlantoaxial injuriesAtlantoaxial injuries
Atlantoaxial injuries
 

Mais de Muhammad Bin Zulfiqar (6)

Carotid doppler ultrasound
Carotid doppler ultrasoundCarotid doppler ultrasound
Carotid doppler ultrasound
 
Carotid doppler ii
Carotid doppler iiCarotid doppler ii
Carotid doppler ii
 
Cr & dr
Cr & drCr & dr
Cr & dr
 
Bone tumors muhammad 1
Bone tumors muhammad 1Bone tumors muhammad 1
Bone tumors muhammad 1
 
Radiation protection
Radiation protectionRadiation protection
Radiation protection
 
Cns infections
Cns infectionsCns infections
Cns infections
 

Último

The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024Janet Corral
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...PsychoTech Services
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room servicediscovermytutordmt
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfAdmir Softic
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDThiyagu K
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactPECB
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...fonyou31
 

Último (20)

The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 

Cervical spine fractures muhamma

  • 1.
  • 2. Cervical Anatomy  Biomechanically Specialized  Support of “large” Cranial mass  Large range of motion ○ Flexion/extension ○ Axial rotation  Unique osteological characteristics
  • 3. C1 - Atlas No body  2 articular pillars   Flat articular surface  Vertebral artery foramen  2 arches  Anterior  Posterior ○ Vertebral artery groove
  • 4. C2 Anatomy  Dens  Embriological C1 body  Base poorly vascularized  Osteoporotic   Flat C1-2 joints Vertebral artery foramena  Inferomedial to superolateral
  • 5. Anatomy – The Ligaments   Allow for the wide ROM of upper C-spine while maintaining stability Classified according to location with respect to vertebral canal  Internal: ○ Tectorial membrane ○ Cruciate ligament – including transverse ligament ○ Alar and apical ligaments  External ○ Anterior and posterior atlanto-occipital membranes ○ Anterior and posterior atlanto-axial membranes ○ Articular capsules and ligamentum nuchae
  • 10. APPROACH TO C-SPINE INJURIES  Following trauma or complaint of neck pain  Obtain lateral  AP, and  odontoid views  The lateral view is only adequate if T1 can be visualized  If there is any doubt of fracture or prevertebral swelling , obtain oblique views and consider CT All patients with sign/symptoms of cord injury require MRI 
  • 13. LATERAL VIEW      1. Anterior vertebral line (anterior margin of vertebral bodies) 2. Posterior vertebral line (posterior margin of vertebral bodies) 3.Articular pillar (where superior and inferior articular processes of cervical vertebrae have fused on either or both sides) 4. Spinolaminar line (posterior margin of spinal canal) 5. Posterior spinous line (tips of the spinous processes)
  • 14. C1-C2  Predental space (distance between posterior aspect of anterior arch of C1 and anterior aspect of odontoid process )  should be< 3mm In adult and less <5mm in children Or less  ring sign of C2
  • 15. C3-C7  Anterior spinal, posterior spinal and spinolaminar lines: should be smooth lines  Disc Spaces should be approximately same anterior narrowing = flexion injury. Widening = extension injury  Facet joints should be parallel Interspinous distance should decrease from C3 to C7  Transverse process of C7 points downward and T1 UPWARDS  INTERVERT EBRAL DISC SPACE S
  • 16.  Prevertebral Soft Tissue  Nasopharyngeal space (C1) - 10 mm (adult)  Retropharyngeal spaceC 2-C4 ( between posterior pharyngeal wall and anterior border of vertebrae). 10m m  5mm Retro tracheal space C5-7 (space between posterior tracheal wall and anterior inferior body C6 ) c3-4 5mm from vertebral body is normal C4-7 20mm from vertebral body is normal 22mm
  • 17.
  • 18. AP View  The height of the cervical vertebral bodies should be approximately equal  The height of each joint space should be roughly equal at all levels.  Spinous process should be in midline and in good alignment.
  • 19. Odontoid View An adequate film should include the entire odontoid and the lateral borders of C1-C2. Occipital condyles should line up with the lateral masses and superior articular facet of C1. The distance from the dens to the lateral masses of C1 should be equal bilaterally. The tips of lateral mass of C1 should line up with the lateral margins of the superior articular facet of C2. The odontoid should have uninterrupted cortical margins blending with the body of C2.
  • 20. Classification of Fractures of c-spine  HYPERFLEXION INJURIES        Hyper extention injuries       Hangman fracture Extention teardrop fracture laminar fracture Pillar fracture Posterior arch of c1 fracture FRACTURE DUE TO AXIAL LOADING    Flexion teardrop fracture Hyper flexion Strain Wedge Compression fracture Bilateral facet Lock Unilateral facet dislocation Clay-shoveler’s fracture Jefferson fracture Burst fracture OTHER INJURIES   Odontoid fracture Rotational Injuries
  • 21. Hyperflexion  Distraction creates tensile forces in posterior column  Can result in compression of body (anterior column)  Most commonly results from MVC and falls
  • 22. Compression  Result from axial loading  Commonly from diving, football, MVA  Injury pattern depends on initial head position  May create burst, wedge or compression fx’s
  • 23. Hyperextension  Impaction of posterior arches and facet compression causing many types of fx’s ○ lamina ○ spinous processes ○ pedicles  With distraction get disruption of ALL  Evaluate carefully for stability  LOOK FOR CENTRAL CORD SYNDROME
  • 25. Flexion Teardrop Fracture C5-6 fracture is the result of a combination of flexion and compression ,most commonly at C5-6  The teardrop fragment comes from the anteroinferior aspect of the vertebral body. The larger posterior part of the vertebral body is displaced backward into the spinal canal.  Best seen on lateral view  It is an completely unstable fracture associated with complete disruption of ligaments and anterior cord syndrome and quadriplegia  70% of patients have neurologic deficit.  common in MOTOR VECHICLE ACCIDENT 
  • 26. Signs: Prevertebral swelling associated with anterior longitudinal ligament tear. Teardrop fragment from anterior vertebral body avulsion fracture. Posterior vertebral body subluxation into the spinal canal. Spinal cord compression from vertebral body displacement. Fracture of the spinous process.
  • 27. Fracture of the spinous process of C4 Fracture of the body of c5 with a small fragment anteriorly Acute angulation at the level of C5C6 with displacement of C5 in posterior direction
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32. Wedge fracture  Compression fracture resulting from flexion. Flexion compression injury  Best seen on lateral view  Stable  Common in  Elderly patients with osteoporosis or osteogenesis imperfecta 
  • 33.
  • 35. Hangman’s Fracture C-2  Fx through the pars interarticularis of C2 secondary to hyperextension  Best seen on lateral view Hyperextention injury Stable fracture ?  
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.   The most common scenario would be  frontal motor vehicle(hitting dash board)  Hanging  falls,  diving injuries  contact sports. Neurological involvement is rare
  • 39.
  • 40.  Classification of Hangman' s fractures  Type I (65%)  hair-line fracture  C2-3 disc normal Type II (28%)  displaced C2  disrupted C2-3 disc  ligamentous rupture with instability  C3 anterosuperior compression fracture Type III (7%)  displaced C2  C2-3 Bilateral interfacet dislocation  Severe instability  
  • 41. TYPE 1 HANGMAN FRACTURE There is a hair-line fracture and there is no displacement. C23 NORMAL
  • 42.  HANGMAN FRACTURE TYPE 3 Prevertebral soft tissue swelling Anterior dislocation of the C2 vertebral body BILATRAL C2 pars interarticularis fractures.
  • 43.  The CT-images confirm the fracture-lines of the hangman's fracture. They run through the pars interarticularis resulting in a traumatic spondylolysis. In this case there was no neurologic deficit, because the spinal canal is widened at the level of the fracture.
  • 44.
  • 45. Extention tear drop fracture AVULSION FRACTURE of anterio inferior content of the axis resulting from hyperextention  This injury is    stable in flexion but highly unstable in extension. common in diving accidents  It also may be associated with the central cord syndrome . 
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48. bony fragment. This fragment is a true avulsion, in contrast to the flexion teardrop fracture in which the fragment is produced by compression of the anterior vertebral aspect due to hyperflexion.
  • 49. Jefferson Fracture C-1 Fracture is caused by a compressive downward force that is transmitted evenly through the occipital condyles to the superior articular surfaces of the lateral masses of C1. This process displaces the masses laterally and causes fractures of the anterior and posterior arches, along with possible disruption of the transverse ligament. • • • • Best seen on odontoid view Unstable fracture Fracture due to AXIAL LOADING frequently associated with • diving into shallow water(axial • • blow to the vertex of the head ) impact against the roof of a vehicle fall from playground equipments
  • 50. SIGNS ON XRAY: Displacement of the lateral masses of vertebrae C1 beyond the margins of the body of vertebra C2. <2mm bilateral is always abnormal <1-2 mm or unilateral displacement can be due to head rotation
  • 51. CT is required to 1. define the extent of fracture 2. detecting fragment in spinal cord
  • 52. BURST FRACTURE C3-7       Same mechanism as jefferson fracture i.e axial compression but Located at c3-7 Stable fracture The intervertebral disc is driven into the vertebral body below. Posterior fragments dislocation common Require ct for fracture evaluation and bone fragment in spinal cord
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55. Odontoid Fracture C2  Fracture of the odontoid (dens) of C2  3 categories, I-III  Best seen on open-mouth odontoid view or lateral radiograph result from blunt trauma to head leading to cervical hyperflexion or hyperextension Unstable fracture Occur in both elderly and young patients 75% cases are children    
  • 56. Classification Type I: Avulsion of the tip of the dens where it is attached to C1. This is a rare fracture. It is potentially stable.? Type II: Through the base of the dens. Most common fracture. Always unstable and poor healing. Type III: Fracture through the body of the axis and sometimes facets. Can be unstable, but has a better prognosis than type II due to better healing of the fracture which runs through the metaphyseal body of C-2
  • 57. Type 1 odontoid fracture
  • 62. The image through the lateral part of C2 nicely shows, that the fracture runs through the body of C2, i.e. a type III odontoid fracture. The posterior dura is in a normal position, but the anterior dura is displaced (arrow).
  • 63. Showing Central location of spinal cord injury
  • 64. Clay Shoveler’s Fracture Oblique avulsion fracture of a spinous process C6-T1  C7>C6>T1         Best seen on lateral view Powerful Hyperflexion injury(shoveling) Stable fracture Common in motor vehicle accidents sudden muscle contraction direct blows to the spine
  • 65.
  • 66. Ap view show ghost sign with 2 spinous processes ???
  • 67. Case 1 5 yo girl  Hit by car while riding bike  VSA at scene  Vitals recovered by EMS  Rose et al, Am J Surg 2003;185(4)
  • 68. Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation     2.5 x more common in children than adults Due to small occipital condyles and horizontal atlanto-occipital joints Suspect if distance between occipital condyles and C1 is > 5mm at any point Usually have ++ soft tissue swelling
  • 69. OccipitoAtlantal Dissociation (OAD) Commonly Fatal Present 6-20% of post mortem studies – Alker et al, 1978 – Bucholz & Burkhead,1979 – Adams et al, 1992 50% missed injury rate 1/3 Neurological Worsening – Davis et al, 1993
  • 70. OccipitoAtlantal Dissociation (OAD) Symptoms/Findings – Wallenberg Syndrome Lower Cranial nerve deficits Horner’s syndrome Cerebellar ataxia Cruciate paralysis Contralateral loss of pain and temperature
  • 71. Radiographic Lines Powers’ Ratio  BC/OA  >1 considered abnormal    Limited Usefulness Positive only in Anterior Translational injuries False Negative with pure distraction Powers et al, Neurosurg, 1979
  • 73. REFERRENCES Text Book of Radiology and imaging (DAVID SUTTON)  Primer of Diagnostic Imaging  Radiology Review Manual(Dahnert) 

Notas do Editor

  1. displaced C2C2-3 Bilateral interfacet dislocationSevere instability
  2. It also may be associated with the central cord syndrome due to buckling of the ligamenta flava into spinal canal during the hyperextension phase of injury
  3. The CT confirms the displaced anteroinferior bony fragment. This fragment is a true avulsion, in contrast to the flexion teardrop fracture in which the fragment is produced by compression of the anterior vertebral aspect due to hyperflexion.
  4. V can c the displacement of lateral masses of c1
  5.    Soft tissue swelling can be recognized by an increase in the prevertebral soft tissue of greater than ½ the AP diameter of the C3 vertebral body at C3 or greater than the full AP diameter of the cervical vertebral body at C6
  6. Frequent in children due to the relatively large head-to-spine ratio.
  7. Type 2 poor healing cuz fracture is above the accessory ligament and vascular supply
  8. AVULSION OF TIP OF DENS
  9. racture through the base of the dens.Prevertebral soft tissue swelling.Rupture of C1C2 interspinous ligamentNo visualisation of lower C-spine
  10. Ap view show ghost sign with 2 spinous processes ???