SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 3
AP U.S. History Supreme Court Cases <br />Marbury v. Madison (1803, Marshall). The court established its role as the arbiter of the constitutionality of federal laws, the principle is known as judicial review Fletcher v. Peck (1810, Marshall). The decision stems from the Yazoo land cases, 1803, and upholds the sanctity of contracts.McCulloch v. Maryland (1819, Marshall). The Court ruled that states cannot tax the federal government, i.e. the Bank of the United States; the phrase quot;
the power to tax is the power to destroyquot;
; confirmed the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States.Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819, Marshall). New Hampshire had attempted to take over Dartmouth College by revising its colonial charter. The Court ruled that the charter was protected under the contract clause of the U. S. Constitution; upholds the sanctity of contracts.Gibbons v. Ogden (1824, Marshall). Clarified the commerce clause and affirmed Congressional power over interstate commerce.Johnson v. McIntosh (1823, Marshall). Established that Indian tribes had rights to tribal lands that preceded all other American law; only the federal government could take land from the tribes.Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831, Marshall). quot;
The conditions of the Indians in relation to the United States is perhaps unlike that of any two people in existence,quot;
 Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, quot;
their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian. . .(they were a) domestic dependent nation.quot;
 Established a quot;
trust relationshipquot;
 with the tribes directly under federal authority.Worcester v. Georgia (1832, Marshall). Established tribal autonomy within their boundaries, i.e. the tribes were quot;
distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries within which their authority is exclusive.quot;
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837, Taney). The interests of the community are more important than the interests of business; the supremacy of society’s interest over private interest.Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842). Declared that labor unions were lawful organizations and that the strike was a lawful weapon.Scott v. Sanford (1857, Taney). Speaking for a widely divided court, Chief Justice Taney ruled that Dred Scott was not a citizen and had no standing in court; Scott’s residence in a free state and territory had not made him free since he returned to Missouri; Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in a territory (based on the 5th Amendment right of a person to be secure from seizure of property), thus voiding the Missouri Compromise of 1820.Ex parte Milligan (1866). Ruled that a civilian cannot be tried in military courts while civil courts are available.Civil Rights Cases of 1883. (A single decision on a group of cases with similar legal problems). Legalized segregation with regard to private property.Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois (1886). Declared state-passed Granger laws that regulated interstate commerce unconstitutional.Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Co. v. Minnesota (1890). Found that Granger law regulations were violations of the 5th Amendment right to property.Pollock v. The Farmers’ Loan and Trust Co. (1895). Declared the income tax under the Wilson-Gorman Tariff to be unconstitutional.U. S. v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895). Due to a narrow interpretation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, the Court undermined the authority of the federal government to act against monopolies.Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Legalized segregation in publicly owned facilities on the basis of quot;
separate but equal.quot;
quot;
Insular Casesquot;
 / Downes v. Bidwell (1901). Confirmed the right of the federal government to place tariffs on good entering the U. S. From U. S. Territories on the grounds that quot;
the Constitution does not follow the flag.quot;
Northern Securities Co. v. U. S. (1904). Re-established the authority of the federal government to fight monopolies under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.Lochner v. New York (1905). Declared unconstitutional a New York act limiting the working hours of bakers due to a denial of the 14th Amendment rights.Muller v. Oregon (1908). First case to use the quot;
Brandeis briefquot;
; recognized a 10-hour work day for women laundry workers on the grounds of health and community concerns.Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918). Declared the Keating-Owen Act (a child labor act) unconstitutional on the grounds that it was an invasion of state authority.Schenck v. U. S. (1919). Unanimously upheld the Espionage Act of 1917 which declared that people who interfered with the war effort were subject to imprisonment; declared that the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech was not absolute; free speech could be limited if its exercise presented a quot;
clear and present danger.quot;
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital (1923). Declared unconstitutional a minimum wage law for women on the grounds that it denied women freedom of contract.Schechter v. U. S. (1936). Sometimes called quot;
the sick chicken case.quot;
 Unanimously declared the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) unconstitutional on three grounds: that the act delegated legislative power to the executive; that there was a lack of constitutional authority for such legislation; and that it sought to regulate businesses that were wholly intrastate in character.Korematsu v. U. S. (1941). The court upheld the constitutionality of detention camps for Japanese-Americans during World War 2.Ex parte Endo (1944). The court forbade the internment of Japanese-Americans born in the U. S. (Nisei)Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954, Warren). Unanimous decision declaring quot;
separate but equalquot;
 unconstitutional.Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). Extends to the defendant the right of counsel in all state and federal criminal trials regardless of their ability to pay.Escobedo v. Illinois (1964). Ruled that a defendant must be allowed access to a lawyer before questioning by police.Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The court ruled that those subjected to in-custody interrogation be advised of their constitutional right to an attorney and their right to remain silent.Roe v. Wade (1973). The court legalized abortion by ruling that state laws could not restrict it during the first three months of pregnancy. Based on 4th Amendment rights of a person to be secure in their persons.U. S. v. Richard Nixon (1974). The court rejected Richard Nixon’s claim to an absolutely unqualified privilege against any judicial process.Bakke v. Regents of the University of California (1978). Ambiguous ruling by a badly divided court that dealt with affirmative action programs that used race as a basis of selecting participants. The court general upheld affirmative action, but with a 4/4/1 split, it was a very weak decision.Clinton v. Jones (1997). Rejecting an appeal by Pres. Clinton in a sexual harassment suit, the Court ruled that a sitting president did not have temporary immunity from a lawsuit for actions outside the realm of official duties.Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000). The Court ruled that the Boy Scouts of America could dismiss a troop leader after learning he was gay, holding that the right to freedom of association outweighed a New Jersey anti - discrimination statute.Bush v. Gore (2000). The court ruled that manual recounts of presidential ballots in the Nov. 2000 election could not proceed because inconsistent evaluation standards in different counties violated the equal protection clause. In effect, the ruling meant Bush would win the election.<br />
Major court cases
Major court cases

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 2 "The Coming of Independence"
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 2 "The Coming of Independence"U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 2 "The Coming of Independence"
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 2 "The Coming of Independence"CarmichaelWCHS
 
The presidency of john adams
The presidency of john adamsThe presidency of john adams
The presidency of john adamsAllison Barnette
 
THE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY RESIST UNLAWFUL ARREST
THE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY RESIST UNLAWFUL ARRESTTHE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY RESIST UNLAWFUL ARREST
THE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY RESIST UNLAWFUL ARRESTICJ-ICC
 
John Adams Presidency
John Adams PresidencyJohn Adams Presidency
John Adams Presidencyjmorrow123
 
POD Unit 2 Vocabulary
POD Unit 2 VocabularyPOD Unit 2 Vocabulary
POD Unit 2 Vocabularynesticos
 
Declaration of Independence
Declaration of IndependenceDeclaration of Independence
Declaration of Independencecortezushistory
 
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 3 "The Critical Period"
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 3 "The Critical Period"U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 3 "The Critical Period"
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 3 "The Critical Period"CarmichaelWCHS
 
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 1
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 1U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 1
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 1CarmichaelWCHS
 
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti FederalistsLesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalistsms_mcmanus
 
John adams federalist
John adams federalistJohn adams federalist
John adams federalisttony_odom
 
Student Powerpoint
Student PowerpointStudent Powerpoint
Student Powerpointdawnpck
 
Govt 2305-Ch_2
Govt 2305-Ch_2Govt 2305-Ch_2
Govt 2305-Ch_2Rick Fair
 
Building The New American Nation131
Building The New American Nation131Building The New American Nation131
Building The New American Nation131grieffel
 
(1) background to american history
(1) background to american history(1) background to american history
(1) background to american historyreghistory
 
President John Adams
President John AdamsPresident John Adams
President John Adamskbeacom
 
What Happened To The Constitution
What Happened To The ConstitutionWhat Happened To The Constitution
What Happened To The ConstitutionMark Wasmuth
 

Mais procurados (19)

U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 2 "The Coming of Independence"
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 2 "The Coming of Independence"U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 2 "The Coming of Independence"
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 2 "The Coming of Independence"
 
John Adams
John AdamsJohn Adams
John Adams
 
The presidency of john adams
The presidency of john adamsThe presidency of john adams
The presidency of john adams
 
THE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY RESIST UNLAWFUL ARREST
THE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY RESIST UNLAWFUL ARRESTTHE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY RESIST UNLAWFUL ARREST
THE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY RESIST UNLAWFUL ARREST
 
John Adams Presidency
John Adams PresidencyJohn Adams Presidency
John Adams Presidency
 
POD Unit 2 Vocabulary
POD Unit 2 VocabularyPOD Unit 2 Vocabulary
POD Unit 2 Vocabulary
 
Declaration of Independence
Declaration of IndependenceDeclaration of Independence
Declaration of Independence
 
22 John Adams
22 John Adams22 John Adams
22 John Adams
 
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 3 "The Critical Period"
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 3 "The Critical Period"U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 3 "The Critical Period"
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 3 "The Critical Period"
 
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 1
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 1U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 1
U.S. Government -- Chapter 2, Section 1
 
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti FederalistsLesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
 
John adams federalist
John adams federalistJohn adams federalist
John adams federalist
 
Student Powerpoint
Student PowerpointStudent Powerpoint
Student Powerpoint
 
Govt 2305-Ch_2
Govt 2305-Ch_2Govt 2305-Ch_2
Govt 2305-Ch_2
 
Bill of Rights
Bill of RightsBill of Rights
Bill of Rights
 
Building The New American Nation131
Building The New American Nation131Building The New American Nation131
Building The New American Nation131
 
(1) background to american history
(1) background to american history(1) background to american history
(1) background to american history
 
President John Adams
President John AdamsPresident John Adams
President John Adams
 
What Happened To The Constitution
What Happened To The ConstitutionWhat Happened To The Constitution
What Happened To The Constitution
 

Destaque

Zot jagen (Vijfde vastenzondag C 2013)
Zot jagen (Vijfde vastenzondag C 2013)Zot jagen (Vijfde vastenzondag C 2013)
Zot jagen (Vijfde vastenzondag C 2013)Ten Bos
 
Ict applied to english teaching web 2.0-fv
Ict applied to english teaching web 2.0-fvIct applied to english teaching web 2.0-fv
Ict applied to english teaching web 2.0-fvAndrea
 
L’ós polar
L’ós polarL’ós polar
L’ós polarkurosh99
 

Destaque (6)

Zot jagen (Vijfde vastenzondag C 2013)
Zot jagen (Vijfde vastenzondag C 2013)Zot jagen (Vijfde vastenzondag C 2013)
Zot jagen (Vijfde vastenzondag C 2013)
 
Colar tjsp1
Colar tjsp1Colar tjsp1
Colar tjsp1
 
camprevLai 2015 4-126137 camprev
camprevLai 2015 4-126137 camprevcamprevLai 2015 4-126137 camprev
camprevLai 2015 4-126137 camprev
 
Diapositiva 2
Diapositiva 2Diapositiva 2
Diapositiva 2
 
Ict applied to english teaching web 2.0-fv
Ict applied to english teaching web 2.0-fvIct applied to english teaching web 2.0-fv
Ict applied to english teaching web 2.0-fv
 
L’ós polar
L’ós polarL’ós polar
L’ós polar
 

Semelhante a Major court cases

Supreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesSupreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesRCSDIT
 
Judicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation
Judicial Review and Constitutional InterpretationJudicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation
Judicial Review and Constitutional InterpretationSaeed Marandi
 
Early United States
Early United States Early United States
Early United States Kris Hagans
 
Section 1983 is born the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
Section 1983 is born   the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...Section 1983 is born   the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
Section 1983 is born the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Federalism timeline
Federalism timelineFederalism timeline
Federalism timelineHaven Jordan
 
His 121 chapter 6 7 a new nation
His 121 chapter  6   7 a new nationHis 121 chapter  6   7 a new nation
His 121 chapter 6 7 a new nationdcyw1112
 
Marshall Court
Marshall CourtMarshall Court
Marshall Courtkbeacom
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academicFredrick Smith
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academicFredrick Smith
 
Bill of Rights
Bill of RightsBill of Rights
Bill of Rightsamytouro
 
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipBrandon L. Blankenship
 
Bill of rights lo#2 slidecast
Bill of rights lo#2 slidecastBill of rights lo#2 slidecast
Bill of rights lo#2 slidecastwzeller
 
Bill of rights and amendments
Bill of rights and amendments Bill of rights and amendments
Bill of rights and amendments Dakota Boswell
 
Academic government reading
Academic government readingAcademic government reading
Academic government readingFredrick Smith
 

Semelhante a Major court cases (20)

Supreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesSupreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark Cases
 
Judicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation
Judicial Review and Constitutional InterpretationJudicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation
Judicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation
 
Ch05
Ch05Ch05
Ch05
 
Early United States
Early United States Early United States
Early United States
 
John Marshall
John MarshallJohn Marshall
John Marshall
 
Civil Liberties
Civil LibertiesCivil Liberties
Civil Liberties
 
Section 1983 is born the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
Section 1983 is born   the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...Section 1983 is born   the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
Section 1983 is born the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
 
Civil Liberties
Civil LibertiesCivil Liberties
Civil Liberties
 
Federalism timeline
Federalism timelineFederalism timeline
Federalism timeline
 
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
 
His 121 chapter 6 7 a new nation
His 121 chapter  6   7 a new nationHis 121 chapter  6   7 a new nation
His 121 chapter 6 7 a new nation
 
Marshall Court
Marshall CourtMarshall Court
Marshall Court
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
 
Bill of Rights
Bill of RightsBill of Rights
Bill of Rights
 
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
 
Bill of rights lo#2 slidecast
Bill of rights lo#2 slidecastBill of rights lo#2 slidecast
Bill of rights lo#2 slidecast
 
Bill of rights and amendments
Bill of rights and amendments Bill of rights and amendments
Bill of rights and amendments
 
Chapter6
Chapter6Chapter6
Chapter6
 
Academic government reading
Academic government readingAcademic government reading
Academic government reading
 

Mais de Terryl Meador

Women in the late 1800’s
Women in the late 1800’sWomen in the late 1800’s
Women in the late 1800’sTerryl Meador
 
Kohl civil rights movement
Kohl civil rights movementKohl civil rights movement
Kohl civil rights movementTerryl Meador
 
Pedestal, loom, and auction block
Pedestal, loom, and auction blockPedestal, loom, and auction block
Pedestal, loom, and auction blockTerryl Meador
 
Cold war study guide
Cold war study guideCold war study guide
Cold war study guideTerryl Meador
 
Study guide for unit 6 test
Study guide for unit 6 testStudy guide for unit 6 test
Study guide for unit 6 testTerryl Meador
 
To what extent was late nineteenth and early twentieth century us expansion a...
To what extent was late nineteenth and early twentieth century us expansion a...To what extent was late nineteenth and early twentieth century us expansion a...
To what extent was late nineteenth and early twentieth century us expansion a...Terryl Meador
 
1994 imperialism expansion dbq
1994 imperialism expansion dbq1994 imperialism expansion dbq
1994 imperialism expansion dbqTerryl Meador
 
The united states and cuba
The united states and cubaThe united states and cuba
The united states and cubaTerryl Meador
 
The united states and cuba
The united states and cubaThe united states and cuba
The united states and cubaTerryl Meador
 
Roosevelt and taft notes
Roosevelt and taft notesRoosevelt and taft notes
Roosevelt and taft notesTerryl Meador
 
Progressive era goals
Progressive era goalsProgressive era goals
Progressive era goalsTerryl Meador
 
Habits of defective teens
Habits of defective teensHabits of defective teens
Habits of defective teensTerryl Meador
 
Twenty states still use the paddle
Twenty states still use the paddleTwenty states still use the paddle
Twenty states still use the paddleTerryl Meador
 

Mais de Terryl Meador (20)

Women in the late 1800’s
Women in the late 1800’sWomen in the late 1800’s
Women in the late 1800’s
 
Kohl civil rights movement
Kohl civil rights movementKohl civil rights movement
Kohl civil rights movement
 
Pedestal, loom, and auction block
Pedestal, loom, and auction blockPedestal, loom, and auction block
Pedestal, loom, and auction block
 
Cold war study guide
Cold war study guideCold war study guide
Cold war study guide
 
The vietnam war
The vietnam warThe vietnam war
The vietnam war
 
Feb 7 spring break
Feb 7 spring breakFeb 7 spring break
Feb 7 spring break
 
Study guide for unit 6 test
Study guide for unit 6 testStudy guide for unit 6 test
Study guide for unit 6 test
 
Test remediation
Test remediationTest remediation
Test remediation
 
To what extent was late nineteenth and early twentieth century us expansion a...
To what extent was late nineteenth and early twentieth century us expansion a...To what extent was late nineteenth and early twentieth century us expansion a...
To what extent was late nineteenth and early twentieth century us expansion a...
 
1994 imperialism expansion dbq
1994 imperialism expansion dbq1994 imperialism expansion dbq
1994 imperialism expansion dbq
 
Space race
Space raceSpace race
Space race
 
Revolutionary notes
Revolutionary notesRevolutionary notes
Revolutionary notes
 
The united states and cuba
The united states and cubaThe united states and cuba
The united states and cuba
 
The united states and cuba
The united states and cubaThe united states and cuba
The united states and cuba
 
Wilson in reform
Wilson in reformWilson in reform
Wilson in reform
 
Roosevelt and taft notes
Roosevelt and taft notesRoosevelt and taft notes
Roosevelt and taft notes
 
Progressive era goals
Progressive era goalsProgressive era goals
Progressive era goals
 
Paradigms
ParadigmsParadigms
Paradigms
 
Habits of defective teens
Habits of defective teensHabits of defective teens
Habits of defective teens
 
Twenty states still use the paddle
Twenty states still use the paddleTwenty states still use the paddle
Twenty states still use the paddle
 

Major court cases

  • 1. AP U.S. History Supreme Court Cases <br />Marbury v. Madison (1803, Marshall). The court established its role as the arbiter of the constitutionality of federal laws, the principle is known as judicial review Fletcher v. Peck (1810, Marshall). The decision stems from the Yazoo land cases, 1803, and upholds the sanctity of contracts.McCulloch v. Maryland (1819, Marshall). The Court ruled that states cannot tax the federal government, i.e. the Bank of the United States; the phrase quot; the power to tax is the power to destroyquot; ; confirmed the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States.Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819, Marshall). New Hampshire had attempted to take over Dartmouth College by revising its colonial charter. The Court ruled that the charter was protected under the contract clause of the U. S. Constitution; upholds the sanctity of contracts.Gibbons v. Ogden (1824, Marshall). Clarified the commerce clause and affirmed Congressional power over interstate commerce.Johnson v. McIntosh (1823, Marshall). Established that Indian tribes had rights to tribal lands that preceded all other American law; only the federal government could take land from the tribes.Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831, Marshall). quot; The conditions of the Indians in relation to the United States is perhaps unlike that of any two people in existence,quot; Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, quot; their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian. . .(they were a) domestic dependent nation.quot; Established a quot; trust relationshipquot; with the tribes directly under federal authority.Worcester v. Georgia (1832, Marshall). Established tribal autonomy within their boundaries, i.e. the tribes were quot; distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries within which their authority is exclusive.quot; Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837, Taney). The interests of the community are more important than the interests of business; the supremacy of society’s interest over private interest.Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842). Declared that labor unions were lawful organizations and that the strike was a lawful weapon.Scott v. Sanford (1857, Taney). Speaking for a widely divided court, Chief Justice Taney ruled that Dred Scott was not a citizen and had no standing in court; Scott’s residence in a free state and territory had not made him free since he returned to Missouri; Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in a territory (based on the 5th Amendment right of a person to be secure from seizure of property), thus voiding the Missouri Compromise of 1820.Ex parte Milligan (1866). Ruled that a civilian cannot be tried in military courts while civil courts are available.Civil Rights Cases of 1883. (A single decision on a group of cases with similar legal problems). Legalized segregation with regard to private property.Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois (1886). Declared state-passed Granger laws that regulated interstate commerce unconstitutional.Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Co. v. Minnesota (1890). Found that Granger law regulations were violations of the 5th Amendment right to property.Pollock v. The Farmers’ Loan and Trust Co. (1895). Declared the income tax under the Wilson-Gorman Tariff to be unconstitutional.U. S. v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895). Due to a narrow interpretation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, the Court undermined the authority of the federal government to act against monopolies.Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Legalized segregation in publicly owned facilities on the basis of quot; separate but equal.quot; quot; Insular Casesquot; / Downes v. Bidwell (1901). Confirmed the right of the federal government to place tariffs on good entering the U. S. From U. S. Territories on the grounds that quot; the Constitution does not follow the flag.quot; Northern Securities Co. v. U. S. (1904). Re-established the authority of the federal government to fight monopolies under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.Lochner v. New York (1905). Declared unconstitutional a New York act limiting the working hours of bakers due to a denial of the 14th Amendment rights.Muller v. Oregon (1908). First case to use the quot; Brandeis briefquot; ; recognized a 10-hour work day for women laundry workers on the grounds of health and community concerns.Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918). Declared the Keating-Owen Act (a child labor act) unconstitutional on the grounds that it was an invasion of state authority.Schenck v. U. S. (1919). Unanimously upheld the Espionage Act of 1917 which declared that people who interfered with the war effort were subject to imprisonment; declared that the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech was not absolute; free speech could be limited if its exercise presented a quot; clear and present danger.quot; Adkins v. Children’s Hospital (1923). Declared unconstitutional a minimum wage law for women on the grounds that it denied women freedom of contract.Schechter v. U. S. (1936). Sometimes called quot; the sick chicken case.quot; Unanimously declared the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) unconstitutional on three grounds: that the act delegated legislative power to the executive; that there was a lack of constitutional authority for such legislation; and that it sought to regulate businesses that were wholly intrastate in character.Korematsu v. U. S. (1941). The court upheld the constitutionality of detention camps for Japanese-Americans during World War 2.Ex parte Endo (1944). The court forbade the internment of Japanese-Americans born in the U. S. (Nisei)Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954, Warren). Unanimous decision declaring quot; separate but equalquot; unconstitutional.Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). Extends to the defendant the right of counsel in all state and federal criminal trials regardless of their ability to pay.Escobedo v. Illinois (1964). Ruled that a defendant must be allowed access to a lawyer before questioning by police.Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The court ruled that those subjected to in-custody interrogation be advised of their constitutional right to an attorney and their right to remain silent.Roe v. Wade (1973). The court legalized abortion by ruling that state laws could not restrict it during the first three months of pregnancy. Based on 4th Amendment rights of a person to be secure in their persons.U. S. v. Richard Nixon (1974). The court rejected Richard Nixon’s claim to an absolutely unqualified privilege against any judicial process.Bakke v. Regents of the University of California (1978). Ambiguous ruling by a badly divided court that dealt with affirmative action programs that used race as a basis of selecting participants. The court general upheld affirmative action, but with a 4/4/1 split, it was a very weak decision.Clinton v. Jones (1997). Rejecting an appeal by Pres. Clinton in a sexual harassment suit, the Court ruled that a sitting president did not have temporary immunity from a lawsuit for actions outside the realm of official duties.Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000). The Court ruled that the Boy Scouts of America could dismiss a troop leader after learning he was gay, holding that the right to freedom of association outweighed a New Jersey anti - discrimination statute.Bush v. Gore (2000). The court ruled that manual recounts of presidential ballots in the Nov. 2000 election could not proceed because inconsistent evaluation standards in different counties violated the equal protection clause. In effect, the ruling meant Bush would win the election.<br />