6. LABELLING THEORY Problem
Takers• The theories we have looked at so far are
‘problem takers’ – they take the official
definitions of crime and criminals for granted
• People are either criminal or not, crimes are
acts which break the law, criminals are people
who do not obey the law
• There is one theory we have looked at so far
which questions this, which one is it?
• The theories we have looked at look for the
causes of crime – why do people resort to
crime?
7. LABELLING THEORY
Takes a different approach – ask how and why
certain acts and certain people come to be
labelled as criminal or deviant, and what
effects this has on those who are so labelled
8. Crime and deviance are social
constructions
To the criminologists we have looked at so far
( Merton and others) crime is mainly the
result of wider external social forces such as
blocked opportunity structures
Labelling theorists take a different or social
constructionist approach (interactionism and
phenomenology) – crime and deviance is the
result of interactions between individuals and
groups in society
9. LABELLING THEORY
Deviance, like beauty, is in the eye of the
beholder. There is nothing inherently deviant or
criminal in any human act in all situations and at
all times. In this view something is deviant or
criminal only if people have been successful in
LABELLING it as criminal/deviant.
So far in our studies we have considered two
examples of where laws have changed, they are?
10. LABELLING THEORY
In other words it is not the nature of the act that
makes it deviant but the nature of society’s
REACTION to the act, individual or group.
Take Mephedrone (commonly called MKAT or Meow
Meow), the so-called legal high which until a couple
of years ago you could buy on the internet quite
legally. The government took action and made MKAT
illegal.
We saw another example of a drug which
at one time was legal – it used to the be
main ingredient in a very famous fizzy
drink, what was the name of the drug,
and the fizzy drink?
11. LABELLING THEORY
Another good example is the criminalisation of
marijuana use in 1937 in America. Becker argues that
this was only done to increase the power of the
Federal Bureau of Narcotics who campaigned for the
law change. Although they claimed that the law
change was needed because of the harmful effects
on young people of marijuana use it was really done
to further the power and influence of the Bureau of
Narcotics. Therefore rather than the inherent
harmfulness of the act the law originated from the
power of a group to redefine that behaviour as
unacceptable
When was marijuana made illegal in the UK?
13. The founder of Labelling theory
was Howard Becker – he wrote a
famous book called The Outsiders
‘Social groups create deviance by making the
rules whose infraction constitutes deviance
and by applying those rules to particular
people and labelling them as outsiders’
(Howard Becker 1963)
14. Becker
There is nothing intrinsically criminal about
any act, it only becomes so when the label is
tagged to it.
‘deviant behaviour is behaviour that people
so label’
Injecting heroin into an arm is not inherently
deviant. It just depends on how this act has
come to be defined by the agencies of social
control. In fact it was legal, even celebrated by
some in Britain, till what date?
15. How and why rules and laws get
made
Moral entrepreneurs may lead moral ‘crusades’
to change the law, or to criminalise certain
activities
Becker argues that this invariably has two
effects:
1 The creation of a new group of ‘outsiders’ –
outlaws/folk devils/deviants who break the law
2 The creation of expansion of a social control
agency (such as the police) to enforce the law
and impose labels on offenders
16. Platt (1969)
• Argues that the idea of ‘juvenile delinquency’
was originally created as a result of a
campaign by upper class Victorian moral
entrepreneurs aimed at protecting young
people at risk
• This established ‘juveniles’ as a separate
category of offender with their own courts
• This enabled the state to extend its powers
beyond criminal offences involving the young
into so-called ‘status offences’ like truancy
17. Who gets labelled?
• Not everyone who commits an offence is punished
for it. Whether a person is arrested, charged and
convicted depends on factors like:
• Their interactions with agencies of social control
(police, courts etc)
• Appearance and background
• Situation and circumstances of the offence
• This led to labelling theorists investigating how the
laws are applied and enforced...and their studies
showed that agencies of social control like the police
are more likely to label certain groups as deviant or
criminal. Can you think which groups they might be?
18. Piliavin & Briar (1964)
• Found that police decisions to arrest a youth were
mainly based on physical cues (appearance) like
dress and manner from which they made
judgements about the youth’s character
• What do we call this process?
• Decisions were also based on gender, class and
ethnicity, as well as time and place e.g. Those
stopped late at night in ‘rough’ areas were more
likely to be arrested
• Also a study of ASBOs found they were
disproportionately used against ethnic minorities
19. Cicourel
• Answer the questions on your sheet by
reading the section on page 81-2:
• Cicourel – the negotiation of justice (page 81)
20. SUMMARY
Labelling Theory challenges traditional theories
by turning traditional ideas on their head and
considering three questions:
Q1 Why is some behaviour defined as criminal
or deviant in some contexts but not in others?
Q2 Why are some individuals or groups more
likely to be defined as deviant?
Q3 How do the responses of the agencies of
social control effect individuals future actions?
21. In response to Q3 How do the responses of the agencies
of social control effect individuals future actions?
• See if you can order Becker’s 5 stage process –
a process in which labelling can lead to MORE
crime and deviance because of the responses
of the social control agencies
22. Becker compares (secondary) deviance to a career – just like you
will probably have a job career and move through a recognised
career structure.STAGE
?
BECKER’S FIVE STAGES DESCRIPTIONS
A This may encourage further deviance. For example, drug addicts may
turn to crime to support their habit since ‘respectable employers’ refuse
to give them a job.
B Individual is publicly labelled as deviant. e.g. They are seen as a
‘junkie’ ‘nutter’ or ‘tearaway’.
C The deviant career is completed when individuals join an organised
deviant group. In doing so, they confirm and accept their deviant
identity. They are surrounded by others in a similar situation who
provide them with support and understanding.
D The official treatment of deviance may have similar effects. Ex-
convicts may have difficulty finding employment and be forced to return
to crime for their livelihood.
E The label becomes a master status. So the labels of criminal or
deviant overtake the individual’s status as a son or daughter, worker,
neighbour or friend. This may lead to a rejection from many social
groups. The individual may be rejected by family and friends, lose his or
her job and be forced out of the neighbourhood.
23. In response to Q3 How do the responses of the agencies
of social control effect individuals future actions?
• See if you can order Becker’s 5 stage process –
a process in which labelling can lead to MORE
crime and deviance because of the responses
of the social control agencies
• Answer:
• B
• A
• D
• E
• C