2. Normative Ethics
‘Normative’ means something that
‘guides’ or ‘controls’
Aims to discover what should be
the moral standards that are
supported by the best reasons
4. Teleological theory
Derived from Greek word ‘telos’ means
end
Determine ethics of an act by looking to
the consequences of the decision (The
Ends)
Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice are
based on teleological approach
5. Ethical Egoism
An action is good if it produces result to
maximize person’s self-interest at the expense
of others.
It denies that a person should help others
when the person will get nothing out of it.
Enlightened egoism is enlightened self interest
– considers the long range perspective of other
or humanity on the whole.
7. Strengths & Weaknesses of
Teleological theory
They provide a relatively precise and objective method
for moral decision making
They are in accord with much of our ordinary moral
reasoning; An action would provide some benefit or
inflict harm. This is morally relevant reason for or
against performing it.
Some moral reasoning are non-teleological in
character
8. Deontological Theory
Derived from greek word ‘deon’ means duty
This approach believes we have a duty not to
do bad
Bribery is wrong by its very nature regardless of
the consequences
It is non-consequential theory
Determine the ethics of an act by looking at
the process of the decision (The means)
Kantianism is based on deontological approach
9. Deontology vs Utilitarianism
Principle inherent in action Outside the action
Individuals are valuable in
themselves
Criticized because it makes
sacrifice, some people for
sake of others
According to deontologists
utilitarian go wrong when they fix
on happiness as the highest good.
They point out that happiness
cannot be the highest good for
humans
Concerned with total amount
of happiness
Theory asserts that there are some
actions that are always wrong, no
matter what consequences
Right or wrong are
dependent on consequences
– vary with the circumstances
10. Kantianism- Immanuel Kant
For Bentham it is Happiness, for Kant it is
goodwill
An action is morally right only if the person
performing it is motivated by a good will and
vice-versa.
A goodwill means action done for reasons of
principle from a sense of duty, nothing else.
11. Kantianism vs Utilitarianism
Details Kantianism Utilitarianism
Explicit and direct appeal to
consequences in
determining right or wrong
Absent yes
Motive for action Sole importance Incidental
Permit sacrifice of
individuals or minorities to
collective self interest
No Yes
Ethics of: Duty Welfare
Theory: Non Consequentialism
(Deontological)
Consequentialism
Formulations on: Sense of Duty, Categorical
imperative maxim
Utility, Maximise happiness,
Hedonism
Common good must have
priority over every thing else
Yes No
12. Strengths of Deontological Theory
This theory makes more sense in cases
where consequences seem to be irrelevant
It is the way they account for the role of
motives in evaluating actions
13. Weaknesses of Deontological theory
Failure to provide a plausible account of how
our moral obligations and resolve problems of
moral conflict
Rules in Ross’s theory is plausible; No reason is
provided in accepting these rule
Ross’s rules are open to ethnocentrism
There is no order of priority to guide in cases
where they conflict
14. Virtue Ethics- Aristotle
It asks What kind of person should we be?
It does three things
It defines the concept of virtue
It must offer some list of virtues
It offers some justification of that list
and explain how we define what are
virtues and vices
15. Virtue Ethics
Emphasizes on role of individual traits
Virtue is defined as a character trait that
manifests itself in habitual action
For Greeks virtue means Excellence
Virtue Ethics= Excellence of Human
Character
16. Strengths
Help to resolve Ethical Dilemmas
It takes into account the importance
of relationships.
17. Ethical Relativism
There is no universal set of principles by
which to judge morality
Each society has its rules and it is
inappropriate to compare ethical rules of
one society with that of another
Relativists thus rule out possibility of
discussion across societies on ethical issues.