Another Step's presentation in the International Seminar about the work we are implementing in schools, after CAF, with the Pedagogical Development Framework. This helped to focus the improvement actions plan on Classroom activities (top management and teacher effort).

1. International Seminar Norway
2012 November 12.th, 13.th
Quality in Education
Learning with CAF
Nord-Trøndelag

2. International Seminar Norway
2012 November 12.th, 13.th
Dinamics of CAF Model
Presenter name:
Hugo Caldeira

3. From Sintra, Portugal,
to
Nord-Trøndelag, Norway
The long road to
“Learning” and “Change”
(4.154 km, aprox.)

4. CAF Model Dinamics
 This is not a checklist!
 This is for “Learning” and “Change” by
“Leadership” in order to Improve results and
get students and parents involved.

7. CAF Model Dinamics
Enablers (how do we work?) Results (what results do we achieve?)
3. People
7. Results for
(Teacher and
People (teachers
staff
and staff)
management)
9.
1. 2. 5. 6. Learners and
Planning and parents oriented Key
Leadership stategy Processes results Performance
Results
4. 8. Impact on
Partnerships and
Resources Society
Learning and Innovation (What have we learn and have to change - Improvement Action Plan - to get better?)

8. Leadership Effect
3. People
7. Results for
(Teacher and
People (teachers
staff
and staff)
management)
9.
1. 2. 5. 6. Learners and
Planning and parents oriented Key
Leadership stategy Processes results Performance
Results
4. 8. Impact on
Partnerships and
Resources Society

9. http://educationnext.org/school-leaders-matter/
 The effect of the action of highly
effective principals influence student
performance in the equivalent to 2-7
months of additional learning in each
school year, while ineffective directors that
negatively influence a student's performance in
a comparable amount (but in reverse).

10. Make Difference
 Schools that makes the difference in
students life, are those who have principals (and
middle management) that influence the work of
teachers so these can make the difference in
students, despite students background.

12. We must change!
Reflect
Improvement
Act Learn

13. Right??
How do we work in
the classroom?

14. How can we work better?
How do we work? How can
we do it better?
• Pedagogical Development Framework

15. Pedagogical Framework for
Development of School Organization
How to What are
What is it? What is for?
apply? the outputs?
With
questionnaires
Monitoring the to students
school's work in Confidential report
the classroom and teachers (by teacher,
Analysis of School
discipline,
pedagogical work
department and
school)
Using Internet
Training Plans

16. Organization global data, by
pedagogical dimension
Example of a report for
school management
Pedagogical
Dimensions
Classroom
Pedagogical
Indicators
Metrics: average,
standard deviation, frq.,
by dimension and
discipline

17. teacher
Example of a report to the
Pedagogical
Dimensions
Classroom
Pedagogical
Indicators
My students and all school students average,
standard deviation and my position compared
with other teachers (private report, seen only
by the teacher him self)

18. What do to improve?
 PedagogicalSupervision
 Transparency in our actions inside
classroom
 Feedback Evaluation (for students)

19. www.ClassDojo.com

20. www.ClassDojo.com

21. www.ClassDojo.com

22. Class Report
Formative
Assessment
Class Results
It helps have the awareness
of the class overall
performance so the
students can compare
themselves with the class

23. Student Report
Formative
Assessment
Student Results
It helps have the awareness
of the class overall
performance so the
students can compare
themselves with the class

24. Processes Flow Charts

25. Processes Flow Charts

26. Processes Flow Charts

27. Framework Process Flow Chart

28. The process is more
important than the result!

30.  Teachers and students are part of the process…

31.  Please teacher, make the difference…

33. International Seminar Norway
2012 November 12.th, 13.th
Thank you!
Presenter name:
Hugo Caldeira