15. If anthropology is shaped by how it is
delivered and therefore how it is
understood,
is this why our expectations are lost
between
the importance we give anthropology
and the lack of tangible outcomes?
16. Is it fair to ask to
anthropology to stretch its
boundaries to fit personal
values and goals?
17. Did we just misunderstood
anthropology in all its senses?
18. Can these feelings of ours be
considered as the ‘emergent’ in
social anthropology?
19. Can the empirical strength of a
holistic approach survive in a
culture of reductionism,
without explicitly
materialising its importance?
20. Is it enough to be a holistic
overview of other disciplines?
21. Is it good enough
for social anthropology to be a
largely ignored discipline?
22. What is the link between our
thoughts and the fact that
anthropology is not publically
understood?
24. Questions
• If anthropology is shaped by how it is delivered and
therefore how it is understood, is this why our expectations
are lost between the importance we give anthropology and the
lack of tangible outcomes?
• Is it fair to ask to anthropology to stretch its boundaries
to fit personal values and goals?
• Did we just misunderstood anthropology in all its senses?
• Can these feelings of ours be considered as the ‘emergent’
in social anthropology?
• Can the empirical strength of a holistic approach survive in
a culture of reductionism, without explicitly materialising
its importance?
• Is it enough to be a holistic overview of other disciplines?
• Is it good enough to be the ignored discipline?
• What is the link between our thoughts and the fact that
anthropology is not publically understood?
• Should we not go crazy with experimentation?