The two-day meeting brought together 54 participants from 10 partner organizations across 10 states. The objectives were to develop a roadmap for scaling up SRI implementation in 2010-2011 and sharing best practices. Presentations were given on learning from the program, a drought study, government initiatives in Orissa, and experiences from various partner organizations. Key challenges discussed included access to inputs, suitable practices for different regions, and ensuring timely operations. The meeting aimed to intensify efforts around capacity building, knowledge sharing, and promoting wider adoption of SRI.

1. Programme Report
SRI Partners Meet - Sir Dorabji Tata Trust (SDTT)
4th – 5th June 2010, Hotel Gajapati, Puri
________________________________________________________
Programme Inauguration & Objectives
A two day meet of the SDTT SRI Partners was organized from 4th to 5th June
2010 in Hotel Gajapati, Puri. A total number of 54 participants attended the
programme from 10 partner organizations from 10 states of the country.
The prime objective of organizing this meet was to evolve a distinct road
map for Sir Dorabji Tata Trust, the SRI Secretariat and all SRI partners
engaged in implementation of the System for Rice Intensification (SRI) for
the year 2010 – 11, as well as sharing of best practices on the SRI
methodology and address specific challenges in implementation, wide-spread
adoption and replication of the methodology across various geo-climatic
zones of the country. Apart from representatives of the partner
organizations, senior officials from SDTT and Allied Trusts, Mumbai,
distinguished scientists from the agro community, noted academicians and
prominent state government officials were invited to participate in the
deliberations in Puri spanning across both the days.
The proceedings commenced with the SRI Secretariat welcoming all
participants to this two day meet. Dr Sanjiv Phansalkar, Programme Leader,
SDTT, Mumbai, was designated as the Chairperson for the inaugural session.
Programme Contents:
Day 1
Session 1
At the onset, Mr Biswanath Sinha, Senior Programme Officer, SDTT, rendered
a PowerPoint presentation on Overall Learning and Future Course of
Action in the Second Phase of the SRI Programme. Mr Sinha highlighted
the year wise progress, geographical outreach and the need for SRI up-
scaling potential. For up-scaling SRI, Mr. Sinha mentioned the need to adopt
an eight-pronged strategy:
 Selection of appropriate Partner Organizations
 Selection of villages and farmers
 Capacity Building of master trainers & village level resource persons
 Information Dissemination
 Research methodology applied to other crops
 Knowledge Networking
 Program Monitoring
 Policy Advocacy

2. Mr Sinha reflected a comparison with government schemes like the National
Food Security Mission (NFSM) and the good work done in terms of coverage
of the SRI methodology. He also laid emphasis on reaching out to small and
marginal farmers with specific reference to rain-fed areas. In addition to
these, Mr Sinha while mentioning the major achievements also took the
example of the case study of a SRI Farmer and some issues of introspection:
 Average coverage has increased to 0.33 acres/ farmer in 2009 from
0.23 acres/ farmer in 2008
 SRI farmers in Village: 13
 How much to expand horizontally?
 MIS is non-negotiable: MIS has had an tremendous addition in the
SRI programme
 State Symposiums: where do they lead to?
 Cross – learning from SRI
Presentation 2:
Mr Tushar K Dash, SRI Secretariat, thereafter rendered the second
presentation of the session on Drought Study. The major highlights of the
presentation were:
 Respondent details of the study (across various States)
 Rainfall pattern in the coverage areas
 Stages of crop affected
 Incidence of disease pest (SRI comparison with CMP)
 Comparative study of plant height
 Comparative study of panicle length
 Comparative study of filled grains in a panicle
 Comparative study of chaffed grains
 Comparative study of grain yield
 Comparative study of straw yield
Comments:
Mr Debasis Sen, Dy Director, Peoples Science Institute, Dehradun, suggested
increasing the sample size of the study in this regard.
Presentation 3:
Mr Babaji Giri, Director (Agriculture), Government of Orissa, Bhubaneswar,
rendered a presentation on Government Initiative for SRI in Orissa.
Some of the major highlights of the presentation were:
 SRI was initiated by the Government of Orissa in the year 2007-08.
 SRI under Government intervention was taken up for 27 Districts
across the state.
 Highest yield was recorded in Khurda District.

3.  Demonstrations were made under various programmes like RKVY/
NFSM/ ATMA
 Details of SRI demonstrations under the various schemes
 Role of NGOs in promoting SRI
 During 2010-11, the Govt plans to extend to the Gram Panchayats
 Opting for intervention areas in SRI for effective implementation.
Session Summary:
Dr Sanjeev Phansalkar, Programme Leader, SDTT, summarized the
proceedings of the inaugural session. Dr Phansalkar outlined the main
objective of the SRI initiative which must essentially aim to improve
household level food security and the need to work with small/ marginal
farmers. Dr Phansalkar mentioned that the SDTT initiative on SRI with
presence already in 105 districts must reach out to other districts and
expanding/intensifying it must be the prime concern as of now. Three
questions of relevance were put forth by Dr Phansalkar:
1) What are the barriers that prevent intensifying SRI?
2) How to leverage from other intervention areas?
3) How to contribute to the well-being from the SRI link to other areas of
relevance?
Compilation of Suggestions from Participants:
 Exploration of available inputs
 In the case of Jharkhand in particular, there is limitation in the
topography and hence intensifying SRI is a challenge
 Adopting a set of principles of SRI to a particular region is the method
that needs to be generally applied.
 In rainfed areas, weeding is a major challenge
 There is need for a central nursery due to fact that early age of the
plant plays a crucial role in SRI practice.
 Every farmer may not have assured irrigation facility and hence
introduction of marker etc is important.
 SRI needs timely bound operations (such as weeding/ applying
manures). This aspect becomes a major challenge in hilly areas such
as Uttarakhand
 There is an urgent need to generate demand for weeders.
Partners Presentation
Presentation 1
The first of the partners’ presentation was the one on Graduating to be a
Nodal Agency by Mr Avatar Singh Negi, of the Mouth Valley Development

4. Agency (MVDA), Uttarakhand. In his presentation, Mr Negi highlighted the
following in terms of the SRI initiatives of his organization:
 SRI is seen by MVDA as a Mission and not just as a project/
programme.
 Production of paddy through the SRI methodology has increased on an
average of one and a half to almost two folds.
 Helped in promotion of organic farming
 Intensified the interest of people in agriculture.
The major learning of MVDA has been:
 Importance of the need for a careful selection of the SRI land for
cultivation of paddy.
 Requirement of trained Human resources.
 Implementation according to the geographic location
 Need of more dissemination and advocacy on SRI.
At the end, Mr Negi spelt out the major challenges being encountered by
MVDA in implementation which includes the prevalent traditional agricultural
pattern, initial distrust of farmers, lack of support from male members,
availability of proper marker/ weeders, lack of proper irrigation and water
facilities as well as absence of proper government support on SRI.
Presentation 2
The second presentation amongst those rendered by the partners was by Mr
Parendra Saklani from the Garhwal Vikas Kendra, Uttarakhand. However, the
presentation was kept brief and major achievements and intervention of GVK
in this aspect was broadly discussed.
Presentation 3
The third presentation was rendered by Ms Ronali Pradhan of the Centre for
World Solidarity (CWS), Bhubaneswar on GO-NGO collaboration for up-
scaling SRI in Orissa – the CWS Experience. The major highlights of the
presentation were:
 CWS has undertaken collaborative research with Orissa University of
Agricultural Technology (OUAT) in SRI
 Promotion of Media linkages and interface on SRI methodology
(includes electronic & print material).
 Support to SRI partners at the District level in the State.
 CWS has recently initiated a campaign on SRI and Traditional Rice
Varieties at the “Adivasi Mela,” a yearly state-level exhibition and tribal
fair in Orissa that was attended by more than 100,000 people. This

5. campaign included a display of over 300 traditional paddy varieties
that have performed better under SRI practices.
 Organizing symposiums at the State level.
Presentation 4
The last partner’s presentation in the forenoon session of the first day was
rendered by Mr Saikat Pal, Head (Livelihoods), PRASARI, West Bengal on
“Banglar SRI”. Some of the major highlights of the presentation were:
 Overview of the vision on Banglar SRI (i.e. SRI methodology in the
state of West Bengal)
 Can grassroots political leaders bring in change?
 Publication of a book on SRI
 Reluctance of the West Bengal government to accept SRI as a new
and innovative methodology.
 Importance of sensitizing the Government
 State SRI symposium and learning
 Cross learning amongst all can enrich all actors concerned.
Compilation of Suggestions from Participants:
 How to avoid overlap of activities?
 How to ensure quality in large Government programmes and especially
what role CWS plays in this regard?
 What is the exact /actual contribution of the Government and that of
the NGOs?
 Establish systems that would ensure quality.
Day 1: Session 2
The second session of the first day was segregated into two parallel sessions
with each session having four partners presentation each. The Moderator of
the first Parallel session was Dr Sanjiv Phansalkar and the rapporteuer Ms
Shravani Roy, Research Associate, XIM, Bhubaneswar. The second parallel
session comprised of Ms Poornima Dore being the Moderator and Mr Sanjay
Roy as the rapporteuer.
Parallel Session 1
Presentation 1
The first presentation in this session was rendered by Mr Debashish Sen,
Deputy Director, Peoples Science Institute, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. The
major highlights of the PSI presentation are outlined below:

6.  Capacity building undertaken for Master Trainers and Village Level
Resource Persons (VLRPs).
 Preparation of communication and IEC materials.
 Field support activities
 Research activities (especially on the impact on soil nutrient status)
 SWI (System for Wheat Intensification) research trials on crop
performance
 Cost Benefit Analysis for SCI versus conventional methods of
cultivation.
 Exposure Visits and Experience Sharing Workshops
 Policy Advocacy.
 Linkages with Agriculture Department
 Convergences with programmes like ATMA, Ajeevika,
Uttarakhand Decentralized Watershed Development Programme
etc.
 Linkages with various research institutions
 State Level Workshops Media Advocacy
 Programme Monitoring (field visits/ review/ feedback to prominent
Govt officials)
 Farmers should be provided flexibility of adoption.
Presentation 2
The second presentation was rendered by Mr Rajib Kumar Roul, AKRSP (I),
Bihar. The major extracts of the presentation are:
 Overview of the activities of AKRSP (I) for the two outreach states –
Bihar and Gujarat
 Some of the major learning has been:
 Due to clayey soil, use of markers is difficult in the context of
Bihar.
 Experimented SRI with some hybrid varieties apart from the
high yielding varieties
 While selecting the varieties of paddy, the farmers choice/option
was exercised
 In many cases, the nursery beds are at a far off location and
hence difficulty of timely sowing of younger plants.
 Problems was faced during transplantations since this was a new
activity
 Due to erratic rainfall, some farmers were not able to undertake
transplantation within 12 days.
 Increase in the paddy yield ranging from 25 to 50% was
observed
 Making valuable the CONO weeder is the plan for the current year.
 There would be more focus on the technique and methodology rather
than the seed variety
 AKRSP has piloted the System for Wheat Intensification (SWI) with 76
farmers.

7. Presentation 3
Aswini Bhattacharjee, Executive (Projects), PRADAN, Assam rendered a
presentation on the initiatives of his organization on SRI for the state. The
major highlights were:
 Overview of the Demography, Development Issues and Agricultural
scenario of the State.
 PRADAN’s SRI initiative
 Plan for the current year
 Progress of activities so far
 Challenges in SRI implementation:
 Due to severe drought during the past year, a partner NGO of
PRADAN had opted out from the SRI initiative
 Heavy rains during April-May this year caused widespread
damage to the summer crop
 Dry spells after the month of September during the previous year did
de-motivate farmers to pursue the activity, however, the fact that the
SRI paddy could withstand drought for 30 days was an encouraging
aspect that the farmers found interest in.
 Collaboration with the Government Departments of Agriculture and
NABARD, extensive training and exposure as well as aggressive
campaigning amongst farmers on SRI are some of the strategies being
adopted by PRADAN.
Presentation 4
SPWD, Jharkhand
Presentation 5
Thereafter, a presentation of the Indian Grameen Service (IGS) – a BASIX
group company, on SRI in Bihar was presented, major highlights of which are
summarized as under:
 Overview of the objectives and models of intervention
 Introduction of fee-based model for up-scaling SRI
 Leveraging funds from various schemes like WDC, NAIP, BSFL
 The major learnings has been:
 Need for a strong cadre of VLRPs and transplanters
 Farmers reluctant to invest on weeders
 Availability of weeders is an issue.
 Initial resistance for transplanting younger seedlings
 Non-availability of sufficient organic manures
 Poor drainage system in case of heavy rains
 Lack of proper extension services
 Better promotion and communication materials to be developed.

8. Parallel Session 2
Presentation:
A final partner’s presentation was rendered at the end of the first day. This
was provided by Mr Anil Verma, Team Leader, PRADAN, Bihar, on System of
“Root” Intensification (SRI) Experience of PRADAN, Bihar. Extracts of
the presentation are summarized below:
 The main objectives were spelt out with SRI being undertaken in Gaya
and Nalanda.
 Initiatives on awareness building of communities which includes
audiovisuals, organizing workshops, Kisan Melas and associating
Government extension officials and the Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs)
at all levels.
 Strategies for up-scaling SRI as well as the major results were
elaborated
 Undertaking System for root Intensification in Wheat as well as for
rapeseed.
Summation by the Moderator of Parallel Session 1
 Transfer and exchange of best practices is desirable.
 Manufacture of markers/ weeders through local manufacturers and
making them more user friendly.
 Making SHG federations anchor the process.
Summation by the Moderator of Parallel Session 2
 Innovations in seed-making
 Taking into consideration regional sensitivities especially in the context
of Manipur.
 Increased participation of Government officials observed across many
states.
 Efficacy of implementation of SRI in various agro-climatic zones as well
as with various tribal communities
 Gradual use of organic inputs
 Creation of alternative water harvesting structures
Day 2
Session 1
Presentation 1

9. The first presentation on the first session of the second day was rendered by
Mr Mohan M Mishra, STL, Bhubaneswar, on Sharing of the MIS Software
being developed for the SRI Secretariat. Some of the major characteristics of
the software are:
 Domain specific solution
 Low cost and economical
 Easy to use and extensible
Presentation 2
The second presentation of the session was rendered by Mr Tapan Pattanyak,
CGM, International Development Enterprises (India). Mr Tapan mentioned in
his presentation about the various weeder models developed by IDE (I)
whereby the organization is facilitating the market by manufacture of user
friendly weeders.
Comments:
Mr T M Thyiagarajan, Retired Scientist from TNAU, Chennai, mentioned that
purpose of a weeder is more than removing weeds and urged the SRI
partners to refrain from using the word “weeding” and rather use the term
“inter-cultivation”.
Presentation 3
Some of the major issues covered in the presentation by Mr Mohit Kumar and
Mr Rajesh Singh, Senior Managers at KGVK are elaborated below:
 Status of Indian Agriculture
 Thrust areas and interventions for rice cultivation
 Weeding and its importance
 Overview of the Krishi Usha Weeder (material used, product design,
utility, manufacturing details, process mechanism, specifications of
handle, rotor, float tray)
Presentation 4
The next presentation of the session was on Findings of On-Farm Research
taken up by the SRI Secretariat rendered by Mr Tushar Dash. Highlights of
the presentation are outlined as under:
 Research aspects
 Nutrient management
 Age of seedlings (AOS )
 Varietals Response (VR )
 Spacing ( Sp)

10.  Spacing ( Sp) X Age of seedlings (AOS )
 Plan of the research
 Execution of the trial
 Nutrient management in SRI
 Imposition of treatment
 Grain yield of different treatment
 Straw yield
 Varietal response in SRI
 Proposed aspects for on-farm research in SRI
 Nutrient management (NM)
 Age of seedlings (AOS )
 Varietals Response (VR )
 Spacing ( Sp)
 Spacing ( Sp) X Age of seedlings (AOS )
 No of plants per hill X Age of seedlings (AOS )
 Weeding
 Water management
 Direct seeding
 No of plants per hill
Comments:
Mr T M Thyiagarajan, Retired Scientist from TNAU, Chennai, mentioned about
splitting the Nitrogen application in the NPK ratio applied for, in SRI. He
stated that the soil quality is not the same for all regions. However, Mr Dash
clarified that in the research undertaken, soil testing was not possible. It was
felt by the House that more partners need to involve in research and
depiction of case data needs to be presented elaborately and with more
clarity.
Presentation 5
The next of the presentations was rendered by Mr T M Thyiagarajan, Retired
Scientist from the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Chennai, bearing the
topic Research on SRI and its Future Scope. Some of the highlights of the
presentation were:
 Outlining the SRI Hexagon:
 Young seedlings
 Single seedling per hill
 Wider spacing
 Inter-cultivation with weeder
 Un-flooded irrigation
 More organic manures
With all the above six resulting in enhanced water, labour, land and
nutrient productivity
 Understanding the Six Principles of SRI is of utmost importance:
 Respective and joint contributions of each principle

11.  Flexibility of individual principles
 Research Areas in SRI
 Comparison with other practices
 Understanding of SRI principles
 Optimizing SRI package of practice (Adopting to site specific
agro ecological environment)
 Impact of SRI on crop response
 Effect of SRI practices on soil system
 Socio-economic aspects on adoption
 Tool development
 Reasons for higher yields in SRI
 Younger tillers became productive
 Greater root activity at later growth stage also
 Larger leaves with spreading canopy
 Greater light interception
 Delayed leaf senescence
 Higher rate of photosynthesis
 Higher harvest index
 Optimizing SRI package of Practices
 Gliricidia is the best organic source in SRI. It is used and grown
widely in tea gardens in Sri Lanka.
 Use of Green Leaf Manure (GLM)
 Impact of SRI on various crop responses
 Greater Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), ATPase activity, and
cytokinin content of the roots in plants grown under SRI rather than
conventional cultivation
 Effect of SRI on soil system
 Soil physical and chemical changes
 Effect of inter-cultivation (aeration, pruning effect)
 Soil biological activity (BNF, micorhizae, hormones)
 Green house emission (CH4, CO2, N2O)
 Carbon sequestration (root biomass)
 Redox potential (exposure of soil to air)
 Nutrient dynamics (soil fertility changes, long term effect)
 Nematode dynamics
 Socio-economic issues in adoption
 Capacity building
 Skill development
 Farm size
 Land ownership
 Resource availability
 Seasonal liquidity
 Technical support
 Policy support
 Labour issues
 Tools availability
 Dis-adoption

12.  Seasonal Liquidity (example in Madagascar)
 Coordinated trials in different agro-ecological regions.
 GHG emissions are an important issue of consideration
 SRI research and evaluation requires a more comprehensive approach
and a deeper understanding of the biology of the eco-system
Presentation 6
Dr Sanjeev Phansalkar, Programme Leader, SDTT thereafter presented his
views on Scope of Social Research on SRI. The highlights were:
 There is apparently a favorable gender balance in SRI implementation
 Who adopts SRI and why are there drop-outs in the methodology must
be addressed so that drop-outs are minimized
 Emphasis to other land holdings
 Effectiveness of different extension methods.
While speaking on the Research Agenda, Dr Phansalkar underlined the
following aspects:
 Trying to obtain more Government support / funding from various
schemes.
 Studying the impact of SRI on soil and how farmers gain in the long
run.
 Effectiveness of our own job
Summation by the Chairperson
Mr C Shambu Prasad, Associate Professor, Xavier Institute of Management,
Bhubaneswar, while summing up the sessions proceedings, mentioned the
following in particular:
 Research on SRI is much desirable
 Socio-technical aspects need to be addressed in SRI methodology and
adoption
 Systematic generation of data from partners is desirable for further
policy dialogue
Research Group Study: (Extension)
 To take stock (research) of expansion strategies organization wise
 Cost effectiveness
 Role of master trainers and hindering factors for them
 Availability of resources and what are the factors retarding the SRI
pace
 Potential of partners, PACS, Govt institutions etc. to be understood

13.  Technical capacity building of SRI farmers and implementation stake
holders
 Developing training. manuals for farmers
 On time availability of SRI implements and inputs
 Percentage of adoption, continuation and large scale dis-adoption to be
explored and strategies to find out
 Cost is a factor and we have to reduce the cost: input level and hr
level
 Saturation may reduce operational and admin cost (promotional cost)
 Let’s integrate SRI with other activities (say-with NREGS) that may
again assure irrigation water
 Adoption / dis-adoption (what are the principles easily adopted and
rejected and the factors)
 Cost
 Extension strategies
 of different Organization
 Successful Govt policy influencing factors
 Success stories by the state govt.
 Advisory group can facilitate it
 It can also be facilitated Govt. institution (NIRD, GIDR, ICAR, CRRI
etc.)
Research Group Study: (Social Research)
 Changing Role of Women
 Impact on Yield, Food Security, well being and Migration of the HH
 Social factors leading to Adoption or dis-adoption
 Poverty Impacts on dis-advantaged groups
 Impact on more Social Harmony
 Impact on drudgery component
 Impact on employability
 Intervention Methodologies – Social appropriateness
 Impact of over production
 Collaboration may be done with
 Farmers
 Civil Society Organizations
 Social Research Institutions
 Modalities for collaboration
 Multi stakeholder approach
 Participatory
Research Group Study: (Technical)
 Study on GHG Emission (Environmental Aspects)
 Research on the effect of SRI on Soil Fertility
 Research on Agro-implements

14.  Research on Packages of Practice
 Need for technical research
 To benefit farmers
 To influence policy
 To leverage money for extension and research
 Modality of collaboration
 Selection of target / interested groups
 Funding
 Monitoring
 Sharing (Workshops)
 Publications
Finalization of Kharif 2010 Target:
At the end of the second days’ session, the Target for Khariff 2010 was
finalized for each of the SRI Partners, with inputs from the representatives of
the partner NGOs in consultation with SDTT. Submission of MIS data from
partners was also deliberated upon, and partners were requested to sent in
timely data for overall compilation of the progress in implementation of the
SRI initiative.
Valedictory
The programme concluded with the SRI Secretariat cordially thanking all the
participants for their active and fruitful participation in the two day meet.
*************

15. Annexure – I
List of Participants
SDTT SRI Partners Meet
4th – 5th June 2010, Hotel Gajapati, Puri
Sl Name Organization Designation Mobile Email ID
1 Sushmita Jeevika Coordinator 974809963 sushmita.bis@gmail.com
Chakravarty Development – IGP
Society, Kolkata
2 Nandini Rural Secretary & 9775501643 nandini.ceo.rda@gmail.c
Basu Development Director om
Association,
West Midnapore
3 Rathikanta Jeevika Field Officer 9874933258 NA
Gayen Development
Society, Kolkata
4 Trupti Rural SRI 9822630382 ruralcommunes@gmail.c
Kadam Communes, Coordinator om
Maharastra
5 Dr Sanjeev J SDTT Program 9223368264 sphansalkar@sdtatatrus
Phansalkar Leader t.com
6 Jitendra K Harsha Trust, Executive 9437682002 jitennk@yahoo.co.in
Nayak Bhubaneswar Director
7 Saikat Pal PRASARI Head 9433234734 prasarikolkata@gmail.co
(Livelihoods) m
8 Avtar Singh MVDA Head 9412079206 mvda_tehri@yahoo.co.in
Negi 9627271962
9 Parendra GVK Head - GVK 9458132555 gvkindia@gmail.com
Saklani
10 Bijay Ram CWS (ORC) Prog Officer 6742351514 bijay94@gmail.com
Senapati 9437320605
11 Mangaraj UAA Secretary 9437064314 uaaorissa@gmail.com
Panda 6811254314
12 Nagendra Kr SACAL Secretary 9437018590 sacal@sify.com
Nandi
13 Pradeep Kr ADARSH Secretary 9437053896 adarsh.org.sbp@yahoo.c
B o.in
14 Bidyut Das SACAL Programme 9437662453 sacal@sify.com
Officer
15 Poornima SDTT Programme 9223331754 poornimadore@sdtatatr
Dore Officer ust.com
16 Pramod N D VICALP Field Staff 9437621332 pac.pramod@yahoo.com
17 Bipin VICALP Coordinator 9439957814 NA
Dalapati
18 Tapan IDEI CGM 9437019306 tapan@ide-india.org
Pattanayak
19 Ronali CWS Program 9437416625 ronali@cwsy.org
Pradhan Officer
20 Girija IDEI Project 9433030198 girija@ide-india.org
Nandan Manager
Upadhyay
21 Biswanath SDTT Senior 2266657977 bsinha@sdtatatrust.com
Sinha Programme
Officer
22 Ramani RGVN, Guwahati Assistant 9401383524 sarmark@rediffmail.com
Kanta Director
Sarma
23 Debashish PSI, Dehradun Dy Director 9897080579 cpwdpsi@gmail.com
Sen 1352763368

16. 24 Radhakanta Samuha Vikas Secretary 9437276629 samuharadha@rediffmai
l.com
25 Dasharathi CARR, Badamba Secretary 9437517948 greenerycan@gmail.com
Senapati
26 Keshaba WORD Coordinator 9853172502 NA
Chandra
Mahanta
27 Manas PRADAN Program 9437622893 manassatpathy@pradan.
Satpathy Director net
28 Sanjay K Harsha Trust Coordinator 9437216407 skray7@gmail.com
Ray (DBI)
29 Dharmendra BASIX, IGS Sr Manager 9835325211 dharmendra.s@basixindi
a.com
30 Mihir BASIX AVP 9431001541 mihir@basixindia.com
Sahana
31 Pushpanjali ISWO, Secretary 9937462339 pushpanjaliiswodkl@hot
Jena Dhenkanal mail.com
32 Sarbeshwar ISWO Coordinator 9938492886 NA
Mallik
33 Arundhati NIRMAN Secretary & 9437554320 nirman96@gmail.com
Jena Coordinator
34 Mohit KGVK Sr Manager 9334726481 mohitkumar@ushamarti
Kumar n.co.in
35 Rajesh KGVK Sr Manager 9470307848 rajeshsingh_pg@rediffm
Singh ail.com
36 Sharat SPWD Sr Program 9431767771 sharat-
Singh Officer singh1@rediffmail.com
37 Sujata OPDSC Program 9438781336 daskpramod@sify.com
Mahapatro Associate
38 Pramila WORD Secretary 9437251373 wordkjr@rediffmail.com
Panda
39 Anupama JEETA Secretary 9437452719 Jeeta_94@rediffmail.co
Rout m
40 Jaydeo Amhi Amchya Coordinator 9765308358 NA
Bansod Arogya Sathi
41 B Giri Agriculture Director 9437222917 digri.or@nic.in
Department, (Agriculture)
Government of
Orissa
42 Sanjay SPWD Program 9955166278 sanjaykumargorai@redif
Kumar Officer fmail.com
43 Kashi Nath ASA PD 9893400748 kashimetya@gmail.com
Metya
44 Shravani XIMB Research 9438173068 shravani@ximb.ac.in
Roy Associate
45 Gaikhangjan RNBA SRI 9612309710 NA
g Coordinator
46 Mitan K BOJBP Program 9438296369 mitanmahapatra@gmail.
Mahapatra Coordinator com
47 Tushar SRI Secretariat Executive 9439339438 srisecretariat.in@gmail.c
Kanta Dash (Projects) om
48 Aswini PRADAN Executive 9706028477 aswinib123@yahoo.com
Bhattacharj (Projects)
ee
49 Pradyut PRADAN Team Leader 9406539132 pradyut@pradan.net
Bhattacharj (Bastar, CG)
ee
50 Rajib K Roul AKRSP (I) Manager 9431807931 agnibihar@akrspi.org
(INRM)
51 C Shambu Xavier Institute Associate NA shambu@ximb.ac.in
Prasad of Management, Professor
Bhubaneswar
(XIMB)
52 Anil Verma PRADAN Team Leader 9934259579 anilverma1103@yahoo.c

17. o.in
53 T.M. - Retired 9445391960 tmthiyagarajan@yahoo.c
Thiyagaraja Scientist om
n (Tamil Nadu
Agricultural
University)
54 Anibrata Harsha Trust, Executive 9776211094 srisecretariat.in@gmail.c
Biswas Bhubaneswar (Research), 6742540683 om
SRI anibrata.biswas@gmail.c
Secretariat om