This document summarizes interviews with micro-entrepreneurs running small food stalls and sari-sari stores in Payatas and Sta. Mesa, Manila. It describes the operations of six micro-businesses, including details on their product offerings, suppliers, sales volumes, best-selling items, number of customers, and challenges securing startup capital. The micro-entrepreneurs discuss sourcing ingredients from local markets and cooperatives, typical daily and weekly sales ranging from P500-P1000, and the importance of offering credit to customers to maintain business.
4. Define and Understand …
… with this first case.
In 2010, Wells Fargo =
6,335 retail branches called stores.”
12,000 ATMs
280,000 employees
> 70 million employees
1 of the Big Four Banks of the U.S.
with BofA, Citigroup, JP
Morgan Chase.
5. How Attained & Sustained …
… MARKET LEADERSHIP.
Understood early brutal fact of deregulation = banking is a
commodity.
So, pioneered application of technologies chosen
metric of superior performance = profit per employee.
Early leader in 24 hour banking by phone.
Early adopter of ATMs
1st to allow people to buy & sell mutual funds at an ATM
Pioneered in Internet & e-banking.
6. Service Differentiating Even with
“Commoditization” …
Case: ING Direct Bank*.
March 2001, opened Cafes in 6 cities: Chicago,
Philadelphia, L.A., NYC, St. Cloud MN, Waikiki,
Honololu.
Inside each Café, account-holder can via several
terminals, check status of account, surf internet
free of charge.
Also features seminars on financial topics like
money management, handling one’s retirement,
mortgages and credit management.
7. Is that all that’s needed for …
… Rural Banks
to attain Market
Leadership in
Micro-Finance?
8. No, that’s not all!
The micro-finance context = different & broader.
Rural Banks’ designated mission and objective in
micro-finance =
“To do WELL and to do GOOD.”
The 2 cases of Wells Fargo & ING = both after the
“Do-Well” goal only.
9. To Do Good to Whom?
To the marginalized poor, the Class DE.
The marginalized poor micro-entrepreneurs.
And who are these?
10. The Socio-Economic Classes
SEC Categories % of Total*
Class AB (Rich) segment 5
Class C (Middle Class) segment 15
Class DE-1 (Borderline Poor) segment 40
Class DE-2 (Middle Poor) segment 25
Class DE-3 (Extreme Poor) segment 15
*Sources: Socal Weather Stations & Poverty Mapping by Prof. Estrella
Domingo.
11. So to Which Poor?
To do “well”
Where can you make money?
The Borderline Poor segment.
To do “good”
Who has the most need?
The Neediest of the Needy (Extreme Poor)
segment.
12. Are there …
… Micro-
Entrepreneurs
in the Extreme Poor
Segment?
35. Are the “wholesale” MFEs …
… reaching them?
The likes of: CARD, NWTF, Bansalan
Coop, Uplift, …
Not really!
36. What about those of you …
… who are “wholesale” Rural Banks?
Those of you who are multiple branch Rural Banks, are you
reaching them?
To what extent?
What’s your loan portfolio split like?
What % go to micro-entrepreneurs in the Borderline Poor
segment, the Middle Poor segment, and most importantly, to
the Extreme Poor segment?
37. What about the “Retail” MFEs?
Are the “retail” MFEs reaching them?
Those local NGOs, are they?
Those of you who are “retail” Rural Banks, who are Single
Office RBs, are you reaching them?
To what extent?
What’s your loan portfolio split by the poor segments like?
38. So Who’s Able …
… to only do well but unfortunately not yet do good?
Do “well” = profitable.
Do “quite well” = quite profitable.
Do “very well” = very profitable.
Who’s able to do and has the facts to show they do
well and also do good at the same time?
39. So What Do You Do?
How can you Rural Bankers reach the micro-
entrepreneurs in the …
Borderline Poor segment,
Middle Poor segment, and
Extreme Poor segment most especially?
40. In doing so, how can …
… you “DoWell”
& “Do Good”
at the same time?
41. 1st. Stop Thinking …
… “competition,” at least at the rural bank branch
level.
At the “category” level, … sana ganun.
That is, at the rural bank as an industry vs other
categories of financial institutions participating in
micro-financing.
42. 2nd. Start Thinking …
… instead (as one option) about a “FIT” between
a poor segment & an MFI.
In what poor segment are the Rural Banks as a
category best suited to do well and to do good?
What about the other micro-financing categories?
How feasible, doable?
43. 3rd. Start Thinking …
… instead (as another option) of carefully assigning
the attainment of:
Your “doing well” objective to your “wholesale” lending
function or group.
Your “doing good” objective to some of your “retail”
branches.
How feasible, doable?
44. 4th. Start Thinking …
… instead (as still another option) “CSR” (Corporate
Social Responsibility).
Let your CSR Group take care of your “doing good”
objective including “doing good” to the neediest of the
needy, the Extreme Poor micro-entrepreneurs.
Then your mainstream rural banking office and
branches will take care of “doing well” from which your
CSR “doing good” activities will source funding
support.
How feasible, doable?
45. So, This Is How …
… Rural Banks as a category, as an industry will
gain
… sustainable
… market leadership
… in microfinance
… to assist micro-entrepreneurs
… in the borderline poor, middle poor
and most of all, extreme poor segments.
46. And This Is WHEN …
… it will make marketing sense
… to speak
… of market leadership
… for Rural Banks
… in Microfinance.
47. In closing, let’s pray as Reinhold Niebuhr did:
“God grant us the serenity
to accept the things we cannot
change, the things we can, and the
wisdom to know
the difference. Amen.”