This document discusses analyzing a team's development using two models: the five-phase model and punctuated equilibrium model. It also discusses analyzing a group using nine situational factors that influence team development, including identifying positive and negative factors and how the group tried to overcome negatives. Finally, it addresses analyzing a group's meeting management, including what they did well, did not do well, and recommendations for future meetings.

1. PMP
a. Analyze the development of a team in terms of the five-phase model and the punctuated
equilibrium model. Which model does the best job of describing how the team evolved?b.
Analyze a group in terms of the nine situational factors that influence team development.
What factors positively contributed to group performance? What factors negatively
contributed to group performance? How did the group try to overcome the negative
factors? What could you have done differently to overcome these negative factors?c.
Analyze how effectively the group managed meetings. What did the group do well? What
didn’t the group do well? If the group were formed again, what specific recommendations
would you make about how the group should manage meetings?