1. apa format no plagiarism 1
A PREVIOUS TUTOR WAS WORKING ON IT REVISION IS NEEDED.982.1.1 : Program
PortfolioThe graduate exhibits artifacts that both demonstrate the graduate’s
competency across all program areas as well as provide evidence of professional
growth.INTRODUCTIONA professional portfolio will showcase your knowledge and skills to
prospective employers and will increase your marketability as a baccalaureate-prepared
nurse. This portfolio will help you, as a nurse, hone in on the concepts, strengths, and
critical-thinking abilities that define professional nursing practice. Throughout your time at
WGU, you have developed skills and knowledge that distinguish your practice as that of a
baccalaureate-prepared nurse. Items that display your skills and knowledge will be
showcased in this professional portfolio. You should organize your portfolio around the
four areas of professional nursing practice: quality and safety, advanced evidence-based
practice, applied leadership, and community and population health. This portfolio will
expand on the portfolio you already created in your Professional Roles and Values
course.REQUIREMENTSYour submission must be your original work. No more than a
combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one
individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited
correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a
guide.You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides
detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be
evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks
to relevant portions of the course.A. Complete the following, using OneNote:Note: The
directions to access and use your e-portfolio can be found in the web links section below,
which will take you to the “Knowledge Base Article.―1. Create a professional mission
statement (suggested length of 1 paragraph) that includes the following:a representation of
your career goals, your aspirations, and how you want to move forward with your careeran
overview of where you would like to focus your time and energies within the professiona.
Reflect on how your professional mission statement will help guide you throughout your
nursing career.2. Complete a professional summary (suggested length of 3–4 pages) that
includes the following:a. Explain how the specific artifacts or completed work or both in
your portfolio represent you as a learner and a healthcare professional.b. Discuss how the
specific artifacts in your portfolio represent your professional strengths.c. Discuss
challenges you encountered during the progression of your program.i. Explain how you
overcame these challenges.d. Explain how your coursework helped you meet each of the

2. nine nursing program outcomes.Note: Refer to the attachment “Nursing Conceptual
Model.―e. Analyze how you fulfilled the following roles during your
program:scientistdetectivemanager of the healing environmentf. Discuss how you have
grown professionally since the beginning of your program.B. Complete the following within
the section “Quality and Safety―:1. Reflect (suggested length of 1 page) on your
professional definition of quality and safety developed in Professional Roles and Values,
including any necessary changes to your definition.a. Discuss how the program assisted you
in developing your professional definition.b. Identify the artifacts in your portfolio that
support your definition.i. Explain how these artifacts support your definition from part
B1.Note: The artifacts should be attached within the portfolio.2. Discuss the importance of
the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) certificate for your future role as a
professional nurse.C. Complete the following within the section “Evidence-Based
Practice―:1. Reflect (suggested length of 1 page) on your professional definition of
evidence-based practice developed in Professional Roles and Values, including any
necessary changes to your definition.a. Discuss how the program assisted you in developing
your professional definition.b. Identify the artifacts in your portfolio that support your
definition.i. Explain how these artifacts support your definition from part C1.Note: The
artifacts should be attached within the portfolio.2. Reflect (suggested length of 1 page) on
your understanding of evidence-based practice and applied nursing research by doing the
following:a. Discuss how you are able to evaluate current primary research and apply the
concepts to your nursing practice, considering the following:relevancy and believability of
datadifferences between quality improvement and research (places and uses of
each)differences between primary and secondary research and resources and the
implications of each in clinical practiceb. Explain how your experience in the program
helped you achieve excellence in evidence-based practice.D. Complete the following within
the section “Applied Leadership―:1. Reflect (suggested length of 1 page) on your
professional definition of applied leadership you developed in Professional Roles and
Values, including any necessary changes to your definition.a. Discuss how the program
assisted you in developing your professional definition.b. Identify the artifacts in your
portfolio that support your definition.i. Explain how these artifacts support the definition
from part D1.Note: The artifacts should be attached within the portfolio.2. Summarize
(suggested length of 1 paragraph to 1 page) your Learning Leadership Experience task by
doing the following:a. Discuss the importance of professional collaboration for effective
nursing leadership.E. Complete the following within the section “Community and
Population Health―:1. Reflect (suggested length of 1 page) on your professional
definition of community and population health you developed in Professional Roles and
Values, including any necessary changes to your definition.a. Discuss how the program
assisted you in developing your professional definition.b. Identify the artifacts in your
portfolio that support your definition.i. Explain how these artifacts support the definition
from part E1.Note: The artifacts should be attached within the portfolio.2. Summarize
(suggested length of 1 page) your Community and Population Health task by doing the
following:a. Discuss what you learned during your Community Health Nursing task.b.
Discuss what you learned that led to your community diagnosis.c. Discuss how your initial

3. focus and diagnosis evolved after working with your population.3. Discuss the importance
of the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) certificate for your future role as a
professional nurse.F. Provide an appendix to your portfolio by doing the following:1.
Include all the documents, prior assignments, and additional items that are examples of
your best work to support your mastery of all sections given in parts B, C, D, and E.2.
Include the following materials:the attached “Nursing Conceptual Model―a link to the
current IHI Course Catalog3. Provide an updated professional résumé.Note: If you have
a LinkedIn account, you can take a screenshot and include a copy with the rest of your
documents.4. Provide professional references, using one of the following:a professional
reference questionnairea full letter of recommendationa list of four professional
references5. Include a copy of your IHI certificate of completion.6. Include a copy of your
AMNH certificate of completion.G. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and
references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.H. Demonstrate
professional communication in the content and presentation of your
submission.RUBRICA:PORTFOLIO SUBMISSIONNOT EVIDENTA submission is not provided
using the OneNote. APPROACHING COMPETENCYNot applicable. COMPETENTThe
documents are submitted through the OneNote using the portfolio created in the
Professional Roles and Values course.A1:CREATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISSION
STATEMENTNOT EVIDENTA professional mission statement is not provided, or the
statement contains none of the required elements. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe
professional mission statement ineffectively addresses the required elements, or the
statement is disorganized or illogical. COMPETENTThe professional mission statement
effectively addresses the required elements, and the statement is well organized and
logical.A1A:REFLECTION OF PROFESSIONAL MISSION STATEMENTNOT EVIDENTA
reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to how a professional mission statement
will help guide the candidate’s nursing career. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe
reflection ineffectively addresses how a professional mission statement will help guide the
candidate’s nursing career, or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague.
COMPETENTThe reflection effectively addresses how a professional mission
statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career, and the reflection is well
reasoned and sufficiently detailed.A2A:PORTFOLIO REPRESENTATION OF A LEARNER AND
HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALNOT EVIDENTThe submission does not include an
explanation, or the explanation makes no reference to the representation of the portfolio.
APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe submission includes an inadequate explanation of
how either specific artifacts or completed work or both in the portfolio represent the
candidate as a learner and a healthcare professional, or the explanation is illogical or poorly
supported. COMPETENTThe submission includes an adequate explanation of how either
specific artifacts or completed work or both in the portfolio represent the candidate as a
learner and a healthcare professional, and the explanation is logical and well
supported.A2B:PORTFOLIO PROFESSIONAL STRENGTHSNOT EVIDENTA discussion is not
provided, or it makes no reference to how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent
professional strengths.APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe discussion illogically addresses
how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths, or the discussion

4. is vague. COMPETENTThe discussion logically addresses how the specific artifacts in
the portfolio represent professional strengths, and the discussion is sufficiently
detailed.A2C:PROGRAM PROGRESSION CHALLENGESNOT EVIDENTThe submission does
not include a discussion, or the discussion makes no references to the challenges
encountered during the progression of the program. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe
submission includes an inadequate discussion of the challenges encountered during the
progression of the program, or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported.
COMPETENTThe submission includes an adequate discussion of the challenges
encountered during the progression of the program, and the discussion is logical and well
supported.A2CI:OVERCOME CHALLENGESNOT EVIDENTAn explanation was not provided,
or it makes no reference to how the given challenges were overcome.APPROACHING
COMPETENCYThe explanation ineffectively addresses how the given challenges were
overcome, or the explanation is poorly reasoned, poorly supported, or vague.
COMPETENTThe explanation effectively addresses how the given challenges were
overcome, and the explanation is well reasoned, well supported, and sufficiently
detailed.A2D:PROGRAM OUTCOMESNOT EVIDENTAn explanation was not provided, or it
makes no reference to how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the nine
nursing program outcomes. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe explanation ineffectively
addresses how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the nine nursing program
outcomes, or the explanation is poorly reasoned, poorly supported, or vague.
COMPETENTThe explanation successfully addresses how the coursework helped
the candidate meet each of the nine nursing program outcomes, and the explanation is well
reasoned, well supported, and sufficiently detailed.A2E:ROLES DURING THE PROGRAMNOT
EVIDENTAn analysis is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given roles were
fulfilled during the program. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe analysis for how the given
roles were fulfilled during the program is illogical, unconvincing, or ineffective.
COMPETENTThe analysis for how the given roles were fulfilled during the program
is logical, convincing, and effective.A2F:PROFESSIONAL GROWTHNOT EVIDENTA
discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the candidate has grown
professionally since the beginning of the program. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe
discussion ineffectively addresses how the candidate has grown professionally since the
beginning of the program, or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported.
COMPETENTThe discussion effectively addresses how the candidate has grown
professionally since the beginning of the program, and the discussion is logical and well
supported.B1:QUALITY AND SAFETY: REFLECTIONNOT EVIDENTA reflection is not
provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of quality and safety.
APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe reflection ineffectively addresses how the
professional definition of quality and safety was developed in Professional Roles and
Values, or it does not include necessary changes, or the reflection is poorly reasoned or
vague. COMPETENTThe reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of
quality and safety was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary
changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently
detailed.B1A:QUALITY AND SAFETY: DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEFINITIONNOT

5. EVIDENTA discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted
in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and safety.
APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe discussion illogically addresses how the program
assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and safety, or
the discussion is poorly supported. COMPETENTThe discussion logically addresses how
the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and
safety, and the discussion is well supported.B1B:QUALITY AND SAFETY: ARTIFACT
SUPPORTNOT EVIDENTArtifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of
quality and safety are not identified. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe identified portfolio
artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of quality and
safety. COMPETENTThe identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the
professional definition of quality and safety.B1BI:QUALITY AND SAFETY: ARTIFACTS
SUPPORTING DEFINITIONNOT EVIDENTAn explanation was not provided, or it makes no
reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part B1. APPROACHING
COMPETENCYThe explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the
definition from part B1, or the explanation is illogical.COMPETENTThe explanation
effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part B1, and the
explanation is logical.B2:QUALITY AND SAFETY: IMPORTANCE OF IHI CERTIFICATENOT
EVIDENTA discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to the importance of the IHI
certificate for the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse. APPROACHING
COMPETENCYThe discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of the importance the
IHI certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, or the
discussion is poorly supported or poorly reasoned. COMPETENTThe discussion
demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the importance the IHI certificate has on the
candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, and the discussion is well supported and
well reasoned.C1:EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: REFLECTIONNOT EVIDENTA reflection is
not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of evidence-based
practice. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe reflection ineffectively addresses how the
professional definition of an evidence-based practice was developed in Professional Roles
and Values, or it does not include necessary changes to the definition, or the reflection is
poorly reasoned or vague. COMPETENTThe reflection effectively addresses how the
professional definition of an evidence-based practice was developed in Professional Roles
and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well
reasoned and sufficiently detailed.C1A:EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: DEVELOPMENT OF
PROFESSIONAL DEFINITIONNOT EVIDENTA discussion is not provided, or it makes no
reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional
definition of evidence-based practice. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe discussion
illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s
professional definition of evidence-based practice, or the discussion is poorly supported.
COMPETENTThe discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in
developing the candidate’s professional definition of evidence-based practice, and the
discussion is well supported.C1B:EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: ARTIFACT SUPPORTNOT
EVIDENTArtifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of evidence-based

6. practice are not identified. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe identified portfolio
artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of evidence-
based practice. COMPETENTThe identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they
support the professional definition of evidence-based practice.C1BI:EVIDENCE-BASED
PRACTICE: ARTIFACTS SUPPORTING DEFINITIONNOT EVIDENTAn explanation was not
provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from
part C1. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe explanation ineffectively addresses how
the given artifacts support the definition from part C1, or the explanation is illogical.
COMPETENTThe explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support
the definition from part C1, and the explanation is logical.C2A:EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE:
PRIMARY RESEARCHNOT EVIDENTA discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to
how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the
nursing practice, using the given points. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe discussion
demonstrates a limited understanding of how the candidate is able to evaluate current
primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, using the given points, or the
discussion does not include all of the given points, or the discussion is illogical or poorly
supported. COMPETENTThe discussion demonstrates a sufficient understanding of how
the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the
nursing practice, and the discussion includes all of the given points. The discussion is logical
and well supported.C2B:EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: ACHIEVEMENT IN EXCELLENCENOT
EVIDENTAn explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the
candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve excellence in evidence-based
practice. APPROACHING COMPETENCYThe explanation ineffectively addresses how
the candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve excellence in evidence-based
practice, or the explanation is illogical or poorly supported. COMPETENTThe explanation
effectively addresses how the candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve
excellence in evidence-based practice, and the explanation is logical and well
supported.D1:"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"