O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

WDES 2015 paper: An Analysis of Dynamic Strategies during the Lifecycle of Software Ecosystems: The DS-SECO Model

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 20 Anúncio

WDES 2015 paper: An Analysis of Dynamic Strategies during the Lifecycle of Software Ecosystems: The DS-SECO Model

Baixar para ler offline

Presentation at 9th Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems - WDES 2015
Website: http://wdes2015.icmc.usp.br/Index_en
Proceedings (per paper): http://www.lbd.dcc.ufmg.br/bdbcomp/servlet/Evento?id=825
Proceedings (volume): http://cbsoft.org/articles/0000/0530/WDES.pdf

Presentation at 9th Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems - WDES 2015
Website: http://wdes2015.icmc.usp.br/Index_en
Proceedings (per paper): http://www.lbd.dcc.ufmg.br/bdbcomp/servlet/Evento?id=825
Proceedings (volume): http://cbsoft.org/articles/0000/0530/WDES.pdf

Anúncio
Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Semelhante a WDES 2015 paper: An Analysis of Dynamic Strategies during the Lifecycle of Software Ecosystems: The DS-SECO Model (20)

Mais de Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems (14)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

WDES 2015 paper: An Analysis of Dynamic Strategies during the Lifecycle of Software Ecosystems: The DS-SECO Model

  1. 1. 1 An Analysis of Dynamic Strategies during the Lifecycle of Software Ecosystems Rodolfo Vasconcelos C. L. de Andrade Carina Frota Alves George Augusto Valença Santos
  2. 2. • A set of interacting businesses that work as a unit – Common goals – Customer demands – Customer base – Shared costs, risks and knowledge • A decentralized approach for software supply activities • Ecosystem Health: comprised by Productivity, Niche Creation and Robustness. • Roles: Keystone, Niche Player and Dominator. 2 Software Ecosystems (SECOs)
  3. 3. • Warren proposes a framework – Dynamic Resource System View of Strategy (DRSV) - to explore companies performance throughout time adopting a visual approach. • He highlights the importance of company resources as performance boosters. • His proposal is highly concerned with business sustainability (long-term profitability). 3 Strategy Dynamics by Warren
  4. 4. • A model that makes use of concepts from Business Ecosystems as well as biological analogies to evaluate ecosystem performance through SECO Health. • The model focuses on strategic issues. DRSV serves as a conceptual basis for the model. – Sustainable advantage – Strategy communication – Dynamic and temporal 4 The Dynamic Strategies for Software Ecosystems (DS-SECO) model
  5. 5. 5 The DS-SECO model
  6. 6. 6 The phases of the DS-SECO model
  7. 7. • Represent the performance of SECO health elements. • Use ecosystem stages as time scale. • Graphs should be reviewed at each iteration. 7 Phase 1 - Time-Path Definition
  8. 8. • Resources identification – Main relevant resources for the SECO must be identified to form the resources list – Example: expertise on mobile development, capital availability, a solid platform (provided by the keystone), etc. • Resources flow analysis – Identify key forces and exogenous items that influence resources flow. • Example of key forces: investments, mutualism, etc. • Exogenous items: biological concepts – emergence, competition, etc. • How resources, key forces and exogenous items relate to each other in terms of resources gain or losses? 8 Phase 2 – Resources Identification and Phase 3 – Resources Flow Analysis
  9. 9. • Dynamic questions – Based on time-paths and on resources flow analysis, the three basic dynamic questions (why, where, how) shall be answered for each health element. 9 Phase 4 - Dynamic Questions
  10. 10. • Strategy assessment – Business model, orchestration techniques, demand estimation, architectural issues, environmental analysis – Based on the answers to dynamic questions. – Changes in strategy may be needed to guarantee sustainable performance – The outcomes of changes will be reassessed in the next iteration 10 Phase 5 - Strategy Assessment
  11. 11. • In the beginning of birth, strategic definitions must be made • The DS-SECO phases shall be executed at the end of each stage • During self-renewal, the phases will be executed several times • As a SECO leader, the keystone is committed for model application 11 How to apply the model
  12. 12. 12 The iPhone SECO
  13. 13. 13 Self-renewal – main facts • iOS 4 with multitasking support and iOS 5 with iCloud • Android as a threatening competitor • iPhone 4 as the “thinnest smartphone at that time” • iPhone 4S
  14. 14. 14 Self-renewal Phase 1 – time-path definition
  15. 15. • Resources list – Potential user base – Capital – Know-how on mobile market 15 Self-renewal Phase 2 – resources identification
  16. 16. • Key Forces – Investments on R&D – Investments on marketing – Mutualistic partnerships – Market differentials on iPhone – Customer loyalty • Exogenous items – Emergence – Competition 16 Self-renewal Phase 3 – resources flow analysis
  17. 17. • fo 17 Self-renewal Phase 4 – dynamic questions Productivity Robustness Niche creation Why question • Relevant launches led to high productivity: iOS 4, iOS 5, iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iAD • Application development was highly active • Despite competition, iPhone still had a vast potential user base; • Mutualist partnerships were strong among SECO participants • Hardware and software improvements boosted niche creation; • The rising number of downloads on Apple Store also boosted niche creation; • iPhone sales were motivating Where question • New versions of iOS and iPhone are expected for defending against competition • New applications are expected at Apple Store • Trend: productivity on the top • Customer loyalty, cooperations and capital tend to provide the SECO with very high robustness. • Users’ passion for iPhone reinforces the potential profitability of the SECO; • Apple capacity to lead innovations generates several business opportunities How question • Innovations on iPhone, iOS and application development must be maintained; • iPhone superiority must be sustained. The Android SECO became a real threat; • The passion for iPhone cannot wilt. For that, investments on R&D and marketing are paramount; • The SECO needs to remain attractive for niche players.
  18. 18. • Apple managed to orchestrate the SECO efficiently • Hardware and software improvements were crucial for the SECO • People around the world remained passionate about iPhone • Competition became a feared threat posed mainly by the Android SECO • Sustaining the innovation pace and monitoring competition was paramount so far and became mandatory • iPhone value as unique cannot be lost 18 Self-renewal Phase 5 – strategy assessment
  19. 19. • Contributions provided by this work – Gathering SECO state-of-the-art and literature on Business Ecosystems for a better understanding of SECOs – Integration with topics from Management – The proposal of the DS-SECO to address open problems in the business perspective of SECOs • Main limitations of this research – The difficulties in obtaining data directly from Apple – The model was not empirically validated – The Mystrategy tool simulation was not explored • Future work – Empirical studies in several software domains – Exploring deeply the simulation functionality of the Mystrategy tool – Adding technical issues in addition to strategic ones to the DS-SECO model 19 Conclusions
  20. 20. 20 “We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery, we need humanity. More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness” Charles Chaplin

×