Essay On Death Penalty

A Persuasive Speech On The Death Penalty
Persuasive Speech:
Why I Believe the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Hello, everyone. My name is Devlin
O'Connell and I am going to be speaking to you today about why I believe the death penalty should
be abolished. There are three factors that I base this argument off which surround ethics, efficiency,
and expenditure. In relationship to ethics, I would like to begin with a quote by human rights
activist, Desmond Tutu, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice."Capital
Punishment, also known as the Death Penalty, is described as a government practice where a person
is put to death by the state as a punishment for crimes such as murder, treason, espionage, and
genocide. While it may seem unlikely that many people would be convicted of a few of the latter
crimes, there were nearly 3,000 people on death row in the last year. Of those 3,000 people, 117
were found to be innocent. It is predicted that at least 3% more of those sentenced would have been
exonerated with enough time and resources. Let that sink in. An untold number of innocent people
have been executed. As it is, many relatives of victims have said that they do not wish for their
relative's killer to be put to death. Circling back to Tutu's quote, the government is not providing
these families with justice – but with revenge.
We are "perpetuating a cycle of violence unworthy of a civilized society," to quote Bernice King,
"retribution cannot light the way to the genuine healing that
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty
Some people think that self–defense is justified by trying to save your own life but if the murder is
committed on purpose, the murderer obviously does not value life; therefore, why should he/she
be allowed to live when they deprived another human being of this privilege, life? Other people
disagree and think that since the murderer does not value life and commits a crime, the law should
not be taking the same path and contradict itself by sentencing the murderer to death. Why kill
people who kill people to show killing is wrong. Putting people to death to prove that we are
against killing does not make any sense. That statement contradicts the country's belief method.
Thus, death penalty is wrong. The death penalty has been a controversial issue for a long time, and
has its pros as well as its cons. The way it is applied varies from state to state and depends on
different variables. Some may argue that death penalty punishment is inhumane, against most
common religious beliefs, does not reduce the crime, costs a lot more than life in prison, and worst of
all, executions of innocent people, while others are convinced that it is the most effective and
inexpensive way of eliminating dangerous people from the society. However, at the end of the
day, as a society we need to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge simply because it will
not solve any problem and will not prove anything, the obvious is that by striking back at the enemy,
the only outcome is an endless cycle of violence. Death penalty sends the wrong message.
First, let's explain what death penalty is and go over its history. Death penalty is an act to put a
person to death by law and a legal system to punish and make sure the person does not commit any
future crimes. Death penalty is referred to as capital punishment because historically it meant losing
one's head. Back in the eighteenth century, people were put to death if they were stealing, did not
follow the religion from where they belonged, disobeyed their king or even were thought to be a
witch. They were publicly burned, hung or their head would be cut off to set an example. Nowadays,
types of executions have changed; the modern world uses mostly execution by lethal injection, which

A Thesis Statement For Death Penalty
I.Introduction
A.Startling Statement
B.Some information and recent data with regards to the implementation of death penalty globally
will be briefly discussed.
C.Historical Background of the Death Penalty in the Philippines
D.Thesis Statement
II.Body
A.Counterarguments
1.The death penalty deters individuals from committing crimes; therefore, the crime rates decrease.
2.As a respond to society's demands for justice, the death penalty as a form of retribution is justified
because the criminal deserves the punishment fitted to the severity of the crime he or she committed.
3.The death penalty provides a more precise legal and constitutional due process that extrajudicial
killings lack.
B.Own Arguments
1.Economically, the death penalty will not benefit the country in the long run.
2.The death penalty is proven to have no deterrent effect on crimes
3.The death penalty is disadvantageous and biased towards the lower class of the society.
4.The criminal justice and judicial systems in the Philippines are proven to be flawed and
susceptible to mistakes.
III.Conclusion
A.Quotation "history will just repeat itself"
B.Summary
C.Restate the stand of the research paper
D.Challenge the readers to think rationally and...show more content...
Moreover, 2015 has the highest number of executions recorded since 1989 that accounts to 1,634
criminals executed in the span of only a year; in fact, the data do not include China that keeps the
number of executions a secret of the state. The 58 countries that continue to implement the death
penalty include Japan, North Korea, Singapore, United States of America, China, and Iraq. On the
other hand, the abolitionists in law and practice include Myanmar, Australia, Germany, United

Kingdom, Mexico, and Philippines. ("Death

Rogerian Argument For The Death Penalty
The death penalty has been around for many years. It started with hanging criminals to
electrocuting them to being shot by a lethal injection. The first case was in 1608, Captain George
Kendall was the first person executed in the new colonies for being a spy. In recent years death
penalty has been discontinued in many states. Opponents like myself think the death penalty should
be abolished because it is an unnecessary thing to do, it is unfair to the minorities and there have
been cases where innocent people get killed for no reason; however there are a lot of people that
prefer the death penalty as the best punishment because they feel that this act will lower crimes;
moreover, the best solution for this issue is to completely abolish the...show more content...
Many people think that criminals will think twice before committing s crime because they don't
want to get executed. The author states, "Besides the arguments of retribution and deterrence,
many claim that a rational alternative is life imprisonment. After all, once the criminal is detained
he or she is no longer able to harm society. However, if the goal is to separate the criminal from
society, capital punishment would provide a literally guaranteed rate of success" (Gibson). This
talks about how the culprit can be give life imprisonment and it won't be able to do any harm
anymore. Though capital punishment can be used to 100 remove that person forever. Again the
author writes, "Without capital punishment, imprisoned criminals are indirectly granted a license to
kill, threatening prisoners as well s guards who protect civil society from lawlessness" (Gibson).
This states how if death penalty didn't exist murderers would not care and just kill. There needs to
be a consequence so people will think about what they're doing twice unless they want to get
executed. Additionally, it protects society and provides justice for the

Essay on Death Penalty and Deterrence
Death Penalty and Deterrence
Ever since the beginning of time man has committed crimes. Crimes were described as acts which
go against the social and moral norms of society and people. People have learned to deal with these
crimes in many different ways. One of the most used forms of dealing with crime is punishing those
who commit crimes. There are numerous ways in which people have punished those who commit
crimes throughout history from making the criminal pay fines to banishing them from the
community. However, in modern times, there are fewer acceptable forms of punishment that are
used. For very unserious crimes, governments may simply make a criminal pay a small fine or do
service for the community in some way. Offenders who...show more content...
This is known as the deterrence theory. The theory of normative expressionism, however, suggests
that capital punishment is simply a form of communication that serves to express a moral lesson to
the criminal and others. This paper will also try to describe these two theories and how the issue of
capital punishment relates to them.
Another issue related to the subject involves whether or not capital punishment actually deters
criminals from committing crimes. Most people think that the death penalties primary function is to
deter others in the future from committing similar crimes. There is evidence that at times capital
punishment does deter. However, there are those or cite evidence or opinion that the capital
punishment does not achieve its desired effect. The majority of this paper will focus on whether
capital punishment actually deters crime.
The most influential text and source of many of the moral ideas of the world come from the
Bible. The Bible outlines many of the crimes that are thought to be fundamentally wrong today.
Also, the Bible provided ideologies and guidelines for the punishment of those who committed
crimes, especially murder. The history of capital punishment can also be traced to this ancient
text. Q5 The Bible says ?Man was made like God, so whoever murders a man will himself be killed
by his fellow man.?(my bible) This explains a lot of the history of the death penalty. Q1 p9

The Death Penalty in America Essay
The Death Penalty in America
The law of God is, "Thou Shalt Not Kill" (Bible 79 ), and every system of ethics and rules of our
society echoes that law. For decades, state and federal leaders have struggled with opposing views of
the death penalty. Many minds have endured this difficult question–Who says it is right to take
another human's life because of an act that he/she committed?
The death penalty is the most severe sentence that can be administered to a criminal (Capital
Punishment 1). There are only fourteen states in the United States that prohibit capital punishment,
Iowa being among them (Death Penalty 1).
In the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, it is stated that cruel and...show
more content...
Fewer and fewer American judges are turning towards the punishment of death in court cases. Many
moral and ethical standards require justices to think extensively about their judgments before acting
on them. The thought of sending a person to die is a very gruesome one to face, no matter how
strong someone may be. As Michael Endres stated, "The execution of an offender is the most certain
way to incapacitate him...the death penalty is not, of course, the only way to achieve this end"
(Endres 19). Equally effective methods of punishment are more often used now. Some prisoners
actually favor dying rather than being forced into confinement for life.
Each year there are about two hundred and fifty people added to death row, while thirty–five are
actually executed. Since capital punishment was resumed in 1976, there have been three hundred
and ninety–one executions ("Cruel and Unusual" 27). If the judge recommends the death penalty and
the judge agrees, the criminal will face some form of execution. Lethal injection is the most common
form. From 1972–1976, capital punishment was ruled unconstitutional (Capital Punishment 2). The
Supreme Court's reason for abolishment was the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment.
They reversed their decision when new methods of execution were introduced.
Even though I have strong opinions against the death penalty, there are many Americans who
support it. Some people

Essay on Death Penalty Pros and Cons
In this time of life, where things have changed to a better world, it still exist massacre, what it's
called death penalty. "United Stated is one of the six nations that commonly continue with this
dramatic scenario" (Human Rights).Debates and political issues have been put into effect to stop
this cruel and inhuman punishment. Since early years people have the belief of killing each other
to solve their problem; what's the idea of slaughter if pain would not be applicable? We should keep
them breathing to make them suffer the same way they cause the suffer ness of us or other people.
Its hard to see one of your family members get killed by one of this people, the first thing we want
is to see them get killed, but if you stop and...show more content...
People are not against the death penalty, they want to see people get killed for their mistakes;
(APW wrote: DP another way) "I am wondering if any of you who can support the death penalty,
would be willing to push the buttons, or inject the poison to commit murder? They are murderers,
and rapists and the like, so they kill. We are Children of God; we haven't the right to kill another
soul. That is in the hands of God alone. We have the responsibility to keep these people away from
others, and rehabilitate, if possible. That is all. Would any of you push that button?" It's hard to see
us pass the law of murder, why should we make the same mistake they did.
Many rapes, violations or other situation have been done by people that don't care of life of other
or their life, do you think if putting him into the death penalty he would care, it's only a quick pain,
they would not care if getting killed. Their many ways to solve this problem for example:
rehabilitation or solitary confinement, if you think about it this is worse than death. Death is quick;
solitary is for 1–80 years or more, with this as well, no contact with the outside. It's like a living
death in a world of pain and suffer ness, it would make them consider it twice before doing
something bad, just to think a life with nobody to talk, it would make them realize in what situation
they got into, it would set a good example to all the criminals. Violence

The Death Penalty Discussion Essay
The Death Penalty Discussion
In today's world terrible crimes are being committed daily. Many people believe that these criminals
deserve one fate; death. Death penalty is the maximum sentence used in punishing people who kill
another human being and is a very controversial method of punishment. Capital punishment is a legal
infliction of death penalty and since ancient times it has bee used to punish a large variety of
offences. Criminals convicted of murder or rape need to be executed because they are danger to
society and the human race. Other people still argue that one method of execution is just as brutal as
the next.
The common sense argument that death is the best deterrent of crime...show more content...
Society and its mixed feelings towards the death penalty; capital punishment is such a harsh and
uncivilised way of treating criminals, but do they look at how the criminals are acting towards
ending other human beings life. They do not care about the lives they have destroyed, or, the
families of their victims. The death penalty can never bring back loved ones back to their families.
It seems rationally to think that if potential killers are aware that if they commit serious crimes they
would be put to death for it, they are less likely to commit these crimes again.
The concept of retribution and justice should bestow to society. This is imperative for peace to be
maintained and that justice is served. If criminals were allowed to get away with such a serious
crime as taking a humans life fear and chaos would rule. Sentence for life in prison will not be
substantial enough. The government must be trusted to protect its innocent citizens from further
crimes. A vast conception concerning death penalty is that it saves society the costs of keeping
inmates imprisoned for long periods. In the act of preserving due process of justice, the court
appeals involved with the death penalty becomes a long, drawn out and a long expensive process.
Does it save its purpose? Does executing someone for crimes such as rape, murder, adultery,
homosexual behaviour, and prostitution actually prevent

Essay on Death Penalty
Death Penalty
The death penalty is a controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of
years. The death penalty was overturned and then reinstated in the United States during the 1970's
due to questions concerning its fairness. The death penalty began to be reinstated slowly, but the rate
of executions has increased during the 1990's. There are a number of arguments for and against the
death penalty. Many death penalty supporters feel that the death penalty reduces crime because it
deters people from committing murder if they know that they will receive the death penalty if they
are caught. Others in favor of the death penalty feel that even if it doesn't deter others from
committing crimes, it will eliminate...show more content...
People opposed to the death penalty also point to the fact that over half of the countries in the world
have abolished the death penalty, including all other major industrialized, democratic nations. In the
five countries with the highest homicide rates that do not impose the death penalty, the murder rate
is 21.6 murders per 100,000 people. In the five countries with the highest homicide rates that do
impose the death penalty, the murder rate is 41.6 murders per 100,000 people ("Deterrence").
Furthermore, the United States has the highest crime and murder rates of any of the other major
democratic nations, all of which have abandoned the death penalty. In 1965, Great Britain called for
a five–year suspension on executions following a recent decline in the imposition of the death
penalty and growing anti–death penalty sentiments in the country. In 1969, the government
abolished the death penalty altogether because there had been no surge in homicides or crime
(Flanders 45). Death penalty opponents feel that these statistics lend credibility to the argument that
the death penalty does not cause a decrease in homicides and in some instances may even lead to an
increase in murders. Another valid point that death penalty opponents use is that the judicial system
is not flawless, and that in the United

A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and
under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances
under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital
punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals
of valuable futures. To support my thesis that capital punishment is not justified, I will expand upon
an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral" in which he argues that
killing is immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument
is as follows:
1.Killing is wrong because it deprives the...show more content...
The outside factors and conditions are irrelevant. Rather, the value is determined by how that
person perceives his or her own life and these future experiences. Thus, when someone is killed, he
or she is deprived of all the things that were of value and will be of value to him or her in the
future. Causing this loss of a valuable future is ultimately what makes killing wrong and immoral
because that individual has permanently lost the opportunity to enjoy his or her future experiences
which are valuable to him or her. My second premise states that death row criminals are in the same
moral category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives. The only factor
which differentiates a criminal from a non–criminal is the fact that the criminal, usually irrefutably,
violated community standards and the law to commit a crime. In the case of a criminal on death row,
he or she would have had to have committed a serious capital crime to receive the death sentence.
Since committing a capital offense is the only reason death row criminals are different from other
human beings, death row criminals are the same as other human beings in every other respect,
including with respect to the value of their futures. Furthermore, the future of a criminal on death
row is just as valuable as the future of a human being not on death row. Any form of capital
punishment is a form of killing. It does not matter who is actually doing the

The Death Penalty Research Paper
Andrew Cruz
Ms. Rachel Williams
Reading
28 April 2011
Research Paper on the Death Penalty The death penalty is a capital punishment that is put into
effect for major crimes. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States and
throughout the world. There was a time period were the death penalty was banned for about four
years in 1972–1976. Many feel that the death penalty is justice because it is retribution toward
criminals who have committed heinous crimes. However the death penalty is inhumane and should
be abolished in the United States. The death penalty has been around since the beginning of
civilization. "Capital Punishment has been practiced in most known societies over the course of
humans history"...show more content...
It is irrational to think that the death penalty – a remote threat at best – will avert murders committed
in drug turf wars or by street–level dealers" (Bedau). This shows that the death penalty is not
stopping murders from occurring. The introduction to the death penalty conducted a survey were top
criminologists stated that the death penalty does not deter homicide rates (Introduction). "For 2009,
the average Murder Rate of Death Penalty States was 4.9 [Murder rates by the 100,000], while the
average Murder Rate of States without the Death Penalty was 2.8" (Introduction).
Not only does the death penalty not deter crime but it is also very expensive. The death penalty
costs so much because of the appeal process. The appeal process is a very long and expensive
process that can go on forever and costs the government millions. Many assume that abolishing the
death penalty is wrong because it becomes unfair to the taxpayers because they think the cost is
less than that of life in prison without parole. However life in prison is less expensive than the
death penalty (Bedau). The death penalty is actually three times more than keeping a prisoner in
prison for life without parole (Messerli). Death penalty trials are costly as well. "[S]tudies estimate
that death penalty trials cost $1

Thesis Statement For Death Penalty
TITLE: Rejecting Death Penalty
Thesis Statement: Death Penalty should not be implemented here in the Philippines, because this is
not a proper way to punish having death penalty for any person made crime.
Problem: Should we legalize Death Penalty here in the Philippines.
I.Introduction: Description of Death Penalty
II.Body
Main Idea (1): Crimes Punishable Death Penalty 1.1 Murder 1.2 Rape
Main Idea (2): President view death Penalty 2.1 Improve economy 2.2 No person will kill
Main Idea (3): Rejecting Death Penalty 3.1 Jails will be use 3.2 Shall not Kill Introduction: Death
penalty if there's an efficient administration of justice in the country. The re–imposition of the death
penalty in the country had been the main argument...show more content...
This is not a proper way to punish any person. The proper way to punish any person is to put
inside the jail in no particular way to take them away. The death penalty is one of the most hotly
debated subjects in our society. Controversy surroundings the issue is emotional with proponents for
and against the death penalty arguing their position by using appeals to emotion appeals to pity and
use of expert opinion. Death penalty has been controversial issue, for many years. It was established
centuries ago and has been accepted by our society. It was put into place to punish those who had
committed an offences against laws of the institution was in the place at the time.
Recommendation: The death penalty. Some people for me feel that it is a good punishment for
some people deserve it an some people feel that the death penalty is taking away somebody's life
which is
God's job. Death penalty is justified death penalty is also known as a capital punishment or death
execution, it is a way to give a person death for his/her crime. However, there are more and more
people who think death penalty is justified have some points. Death penalty has been as high as
eighty

Opinion on the Death Penalty Essay
Opinion on the Death Penalty
The death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment, has been abolished in Canada since 1976,
but still exist in a few American States. The last execution in Canada took place in 1962.
I disagree with the death penalty for several reasons. My first reason is that I find it extremely
inhumane to take someone's life in order to demonstrate the power of the law. Another reason for
my disapproval of the death penalty, is the amount of money that it takes to put someone to death,
as it would cost the same to keep an inmate in jail for life, as it would to put that same inmate to
death. My third and final reason, is the guilty conscience that is placed on everyone involved: the
jury who convicted...show more content...
Therefore, I do not feel that Canada should permit such a deplorable undertaking of a human life. I
know they must be punished, but there is a better way.
Prior to putting someone to death, the accused's lawyer will attempt several appeals to the courts in
order to lengthen the amount of time he has to live; and dependent on a technicality, or a
sympathetic jury, the accused may be sentenced to life imprisonment. These appeals take up an
abundance of court time and cost the public millions of dollars. With the cost of these appeals, it
would cost the same amount to keep the same inmate in jail for a life term.
Would it not be better for the inmate to perhaps obtain an education or be given the chance to
rehabilitate, rather than strapped to a chair and killed ??? I personally would rather see the inmate
suffer in prison and have nothing to look forward to rather than letting the government put him out
of his misery by killing him. To sentence someone to death takes one trial but to actually get some
one in the chair to kill them could take a dozen of trials. The question must be asked why do we
bother with this lengthy and costly process when we could sentence people to life in prison, at the
same cost.
The killing of a human being is very traumatizing to all. Whenever the courts issue someone to death,
the innocent everyday people who are involved must be affected. Just imagine how these normal
human beings, like you and I,

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Essay
Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished
Why should the death penalty be abolished? The death penalty should be abolished because of
many reasons. Many people believe the saying, 'an eye for an eye'. But when will people realize
that just because someone may have killed a loved one that the best thing for that person is to die
also. People don't realize that they are putting the blood of another person life on their hands. This
makes them just as guilty as the person who committed the crime: the only difference is that they
didn't use weapon except their mouth to kill them. The death penalty should be abolished because it
is racist, punishes the poor, condemns those who are innocent to death, and is a cruel punishment.
...show more content...
A Georgia study found that killers of whites are 4.3 times more likely to receive a death sentence
than killers of blacks. More than 75 percent of those on federal death row are non–white. Of the 156
federal death penalty prosecutions approved by the Attorney General since 1988, 74 percent of the
defendants were non–white (governmentguide.com) . This shows that there is something definitely
wrong with the judicial system. If this isn?t enough to convince you that the death penalty is wrong.
Then people may need to look at other reasons.
The death penalty, does not only show unequal rights, but it also punishes the poor. It shows in
recent studies that if an inmate can afford good legal representation, they might can get a lesser
charge than death row. It also shows that ninety percent of defendants cannot afford to hire an
experienced criminal defense lawyer. Since they cannot afford to hire one, they are forced to use
inexperienced court–appointed attorneys that are being underpaid for their services. The less the
court–appointed attorneys make, the less they want to make their defense so that they can get rid of
this case, and start back making their usual amount of money.
There has been many inmates sentenced to death row that innocent. Since 1973, more than 99
people have been released from prison after being sentenced to death despite their innocence, The
Social Psychology of Police Interrogation: The

Essay on Death Penalty
The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment, and violates the right
to life. It's hard for me as a Swede to understand that a country such as USA still have that kind of
punishment. For many people and nations the USA serves as a model, so it is to me very difficult
to imagine how you can persuade nations like Burma and China to respect basic human rights when
you don't do it yourself.
Body
A. Concerning the Death Penalty
Capital punishment –– the death penalty –– is supposed to select the worst criminals who committed
the worst murders and punish them and protect society by taking their lives.
In numbers far beyond our greatest fears, innocent people are being convicted of murder and
sentenced to death....show more content...
In Florida, it costs S3.2 million per death case, six times the cost of a life sentence; in Texas, $2.3
million, three times the cost of sentencing a defendant to 40 years in a single cell in that state's high
security prison.
Wouldn't it really be better to spend those millions of dollars on programs that might actually do
something to reduce or prevent crime? Hire more police officers, improve education, provide better
prenatal care, take your pick!
D. The death penalty hasn't been shown to be a deterrent to committing murders.
Since 1976, the number of executions and the size of death row have steadily increased. Yet there
has been virtually no change in the national murder rate. And the murder rate remains higher in death
penalty states than in non–death penalty states. According to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, states
with the death penalty have homicide rates of 7.4 to 100,000; states without the death penalty have a
homicide rate of 4.9 to 100,000
Conclusion
It's natural to feel the need for revenge when a loved one is murdered. But what society needs is a
system of criminal justice, not a system of criminal vengeance. Many places in this country get along
fine without it: here in the Midwest, Michigan, Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin all seem to be
relatively civilized and peaceful places, even without the death penalty.
In addition to the United States, the countries with the most documented executions in 1997 include

Essay On Should The Us Use The Death Penalty
Should the United States stop using the death penalty?
The use of the capital punishment or the "death" penalty should not stop being used in the U.S. or
declared as cruel or unusual punishment.
In many cases people slaughter multiple people without flinching and go on with their day should
these people be allowed to live anymore ask the families of those murdered people. What do you
think they would tell you? Some people say that we are getting fewer and fewer use of the death
penalty so it should be abolished. If it is being used so little these days doesn't it mean that it's
working punishment isn't only used to punish those guilty but to set an example for those thinking
of committing a similar crime. "Last year the U.S. executed 39 people fewer than the year
before."(What it means if the death penalty is dying,Richard Dieter) Crimes such as rape, torture,
treason,kidnapping, murder, larceny, and perjury would have anarchy throughout the community if
not acted on...show more content...
In saying this it costs less money than to house feed and possibly treat medical conditions of
criminals i'm not saying that it's a scapegoat for saving money to not let them live. Ask the
families of those lost of the Boston Marathon incident do those who did this horrible act be
allowed to be fed better than children at our own public schools and a roof over their head when
thousands of people in the U.S. are homeless. There are cases in which using the death penalty is
deemed unconstitutional which supports people arguments against it but it does not apply for all
cases. On the other hand other cases in which it is not used when it should be only exposes the
corruption of our seemingly perfect just system. The death penalty should not be taken away and
permanently stated as cruel and unusual

Synthesis Essay On The Death Penalty
For most of human civilisation, death sentences have been in common use. Most of the time, death
sentences have been issued to people who break the law. However, the use of death is controversial
in its effects and morality. Today, the death penalty is constantly debated about on whether it should
be used or not. The death penalty is usually issued to those commit "terrorism, treason, hijacking
resulting in the death of a hostage, or the killing of a police[officer] or prison guard acting in the line
of duty" (Source D). As source B indicates, opinions on the death penalty are mixed as the
percentages of those in favour and of those opposed fluctuate. The death penalty is unjust as a form
of punishment for committing a major felony. The death penalty is permanent and is morally
wrong. The penalty of death is a permanent solution as a punishment. Often times in court cases,
there is a "likelihood of a miscarriage of justice"(Source C). There is often a miscarriage of justice
in cases. In court cases, there are doubts that are voiced. If they are ordered the death penalty, they
may be found out to be innocent. However, they...show more content...
The mother of a murder victim has stated "Responding to one killing with another killing does
not [honour] my daughter"(Source F). The killing of another person doesn't mean we should kill
another for justice. In reality, the death sentences is based on emotional reactions as we try to
sympathise with the victims. This should not be the way cases should be run, since they should
be based off factual evidence. Society needs to realise that "The standard for depriving one of life
should be higher than any other legal action"(Source C). The loss of a life is a difficult choice to
make as a society, even if it's the judgement of a criminal. However, we are no better than the
criminal if we kill them as well. People need to learn from its mistakes, as well as help others learn
from their

Is the Death Penalty Ethical? Essay examples
"More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of
knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local
affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were
executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases
were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize
themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no
longer giving any excuses for killing humans. The controversial idea of whether humans are rational
enough to decide someone's life or death has been questioned. Humans absolutely don't have...show
more content...
People who commit the crime should get imprisoned for what they did for how long ever it is
given. Murderer who took away other's lives should be imprisoned for what they did for the rest
of their lives. Death penalty is absolutely not necessary because imprison itself will take away the
whole lives; they will not be allowed to have any life as human in society. We kill him, because he
killed is simply how death penalty works. Death penalty is only to take away people's life, not
reasonable punishment for their sin. Of course, people think death penalty is not just about the
punishment. People who believe in death penalty show the reason why they do is that death penalty
for sure is a deterrent to homicide. They also take this as a justification of supporting death penalty
system (2010). So people actually expect something out of this system other than just killing the
murderers simply for what they did. This is supposed to be a great solution to make better society by
lessoning the potential crime. In theory, the fact that society has a death penalty system should
somewhat scares the potential murderer and prevents them from committing murder. But the
percentage of murder crime shows the otherwise. Do potential murderers consider the death penalty
before they the murder? The answers are likely to be No. "Most deterrence research has found that

Ethos On Death Penalty
The death penalty has been a huge part of many political debates for the past few decades. There
are two sides, those for and those against its continued use and both have logical arguments. My
research question is if it is ethical and or beneficial for the U.S. government to continue using the
death penalty? To gain the attention of my audience, I am going to share two stories that my sources
have on those with experience in the debate. The Forbes article, "Considering The Death Penalty:
Your Tax Dollars At Work," is an anti
–death penalty piece explaining how an innocent man was on
death row and his opinion on whether or not it should be used. He said in the piece that living out a
life sentence without parole is worse than being executed....show more content...
One, saying it is inhumane and should not be done and the other side says that it is necessary in our
society. Some of the non–biased sources go over just the statistics of the death penalty. This
includes "DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER Facts about the Death Penalty" and
"Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed?". The first article explains the costs associated with the
punishment, how much it is used, states that use it, and people on death row. The second piece
gives unbiased statistics on the pros and cons on the death penalty. By providing this background,
I hope my audience will be more aware of the debate and have more information. I will then
incorporate a few more factual based articles to try and provide all the necessary details, such as
"Death Penalty Pro Con" and a few more biased articles then to get opinions going. I feel that all
my sources work well together as even when the articles have different viewpoints, they do not
contradict one another much. Basically, they highlight the importance of their own arguments and
do not really go after the other side. Overall, I feel that I have the sources necessary to write this
piece. However, I do feel that having a few more scholarly articles will only help my

Abstract On The Death Penalty
Abstract
The issue of capital punishment is a difficult one and the opinions are as diverse as the people
giving them. The death penalty exists in 38 states and those that have it spend enormous amounts
of tax payer dollars to engage the justice system in what is a long and drawn out series of court
dates and appeals that are lasting years. In addition, the trials and appeals of those on Death Row
will have attorneys, prosecutors, experts and judges with more experience creating a major strain
on the budget and manpower of the state. Nationally there is no study identifying the cost
associated with the Death Penalty, but each state uses their state laws and pay scales in
determining the cost of the Death Penalty. Prior to the Death Penalty being abolished New York
has spent millions of dollars on Death Penalty cases and the result was there were no executions.
Those in favor of the death penalty believe that the cost associated with incarcerating an
individual for life will far outweigh those associated with the Death Penalty, due to old age,
medical issues, food and other essentials needed to keep one alive. This would be true if the Death
Penalty was a swift method of justice. The monies spent on Death Penalty cases could be far better
spent on local budgets and programs that are evidenced based and proven to provide needed
services, such as law enforcement, drug treatment and youth programs.
Beginning

Essay On Death Penalty

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Services

More from Custom Paper Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Death Penalty