Alternative Feed Ingredients: Real Options or Just a Nice Idea? - Dr. Brian Richert, Associate Professor of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, from the 2012 Minnesota Pork Congress, January 18-19, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
12. Low Quality, Less Digestible DDGS High Quality, Highly Digestible DDGS Effect of Processing Method on DDGS Quality
13.
14.
15.
16. Gain P = 0.57 Feed Intake P = 0.05 G:F P = 0.70 Whitney and Shurson, 2004 20 or 25% DDGS Gain = 1.5 lb lighter after 2 weeks Consumed 2 lb less Feed
17. Gain P < 0.01 Feed Intake P < 0.01 F:G P = 0.79 a ab a b b a a b ab b Gaines et al. 2006 30 or 40% DDGS Gain = 1.5 lb lighter after 2 weeks Consumed 2 lb less Feed
19. Increasing levels of DDGS on Grower pig ADG Percent Distillers Linneen et al., 2007; KSU lb/d DDGS, P < 0.06 SE=0.033
20. Increasing levels of DDGS on Grow-Finish pig ADG Percent Distillers Diets balanced on an Avail. AA Basis Linneen et al., 2005, KSU lb/d DDGS linear, P < 0.10 DDGS linear, P < 0.01 Fu et al., 2004, Univ. of Missouri lb/d
21. Effect on Carcass Weight Diet, P = 0.04 - 6.0 lbs - 6.5 lbs - 9.5 lbs Fu et al. 2003 a ab ab b
22. Increasing levels of DDGS on Finishing pig Variability Percent Distillers Whitney et al., 2006 CV, % DDGS, P < 0.02 SE=0.74
23.
24. 60% DDGS in GF Bergstrom et al., 2010 20% DDGS 60% DDGS P< B G B G DDGS D 0-78 ADG 1.96 1.91 1.85 1.83 0.001 ADFI 5.22 4.89 5.17 4.84 NS FG 2.67 2.56 2.79 2.64 0.001 BW, lb 233.4 226.8 223.4 221.2 0.001 Jowl IV 69.9 72.5 80.7 83.8 0.001 Switch 60% to 20% d 78-99 ADG 2.40 2.30 2.54 2.47 0.01 Final BW 281.7 273.5 275.9 271.3 0.02 Carcass Wt 210.3 203.1 204.7 199.6 0.01 Jowl IV 71.1 74.4 80.2 82.2 0.05
25.
26.
27.
28.
29. Different Levels of DDGS on Belly Quality 0%, no Added Fat 30% DDGS 20% DDGS 10% DDGS 0% DDGS + ~ 3% Added Fat (CWG)
30.
31. Iodine Value P < 0.0001 62.54 c ± 0.607 71.15 b ± 0.600 79.64 a ± 0.600
32. Bacon Slice Yield 1 n=40 per dietary treatment 2 Means followed by different superscripts differ, P<0.01 Dietary treatment Percent relative change from dietary treatment 1,2 SE Corn-SBM Control 0.0 a ---- 25% DDGS -2.95 a 2.64 25% DDGS + 5.3% RG -18.46 b 2.64
33. Consumer Purchase Intent Corn-SBM Control 25% DDGS 25% DDGS + 5.3% RG Uncooked bacon Would purchase 70.68 72.18 47.32 Might or might not purchase 21.05 20.30 29.46 Would not purchase 8.27 7.52 23.21 Cooked bacon Would purchase 68.65 67.67 50.45 Might or might not purchase 24.63 24.81 28.83 Would not purchase 6.72 7.52 20.72
34. Increasing levels of DDGS on Pork Quality abc Means within a row are significantly different (P < 0.05). xy Means within a column are significantly different (P < 0.05). Weimer et al., 2007 Cont. NF Cont. + ~ 3% CWG 10% 20% 30% Belly bending, % Barrows 100 ax 96 ax 91 ax 59 bx 49 bx Gilts 80 ax 82 ax 67 aby 44 bcy 27 cy %BF – loin Separation 25.0 16.7 66.7 75.0 91.7
35.
36. Effect of 30% DDGS withdrawal time on dressing percent JBS United 2007