Саша Рудан Relevancies, Collaboration,   and Socio-knowledge in Topic Maps ( [email_address] ) ( [email_address] ) Синаша ...
Introduction /16 www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig www. KnowledgeFederation .com www. SocioTM .com Poliscopy Knowledge i...
<ul><li>Users are interested in </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Browsing in  meta-data   ( knowledge )  space </li></ul></ul><ul><ul...
<ul><li>Ubiquity phenomena </li></ul><ul><li>No talk about recommenders </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Google news, Amazon, MovieLe...
<ul><li>Ranking support in TM </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Scopes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Associations </li></ul></ul><ul><li>...
<ul><li>Information and meta-data space huge and highly interconnected </li></ul><ul><li>Interconnections important for us...
SocioTM model <ul><li>Relevancies on  </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Occurrence and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Topic map constructs...
<ul><li>Global and Conceptual overview </li></ul>SocioTM  Model (continued) www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /12
<ul><li>Implementation </li></ul><ul><li>User implicit feedback </li></ul><ul><li>Relevance evolution </li></ul>Relevance ...
<ul><li>f USER-NORMALIZING  =  f GROUP-PROFILE  x  f USER-PROFILE   x  f ST/LT-INTERESTS  x  f SEARCH-ITEM x  f EXPLICIT-S...
<ul><li>Building dynamic SocioTM </li></ul><ul><ul><li>As copy of topic space </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>On-the-fly </li><...
<ul><li>Challenges </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Overloading </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Navigation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Unde...
Socio-Potential Law <ul><li>Blue Circle  – search location </li></ul><ul><li>Red Ring  – browsing location </li></ul><ul><...
<ul><li>Socio-knowledge migration </li></ul><ul><li>Needs for pre-populated user preferences for a new TM </li></ul><ul><l...
<ul><li>Introducing SocioTM into the existing systems </li></ul><ul><li>Vertical compatibility </li></ul><ul><li>Standardi...
<ul><li>Extend/add to TM standard  </li></ul><ul><li>not just a business-logic module </li></ul><ul><li>Introducing fuzzy,...
<ul><li>There is no standard defect but it is extension </li></ul><ul><li>Should we bother other users with our opinions? ...
<ul><li>Саша Рудан </li></ul>Relevancies, Collaboration,   and Socio-knowledge in Topic Maps SocioTM ( [email_address] ) (...
Próximos SlideShares
Carregando em…5
×

SocioTM – Relevancies, Collaboration, and Socio-knowledge in Topic Maps

1.331 visualizações

Publicada em

Topic Maps (TM) standard has solved a lot of problems in the information overload. With a semantic layer on the top of the existing data pools, TMs provide user-specific information interpretation and organization. However, one important component is missing in the TM standard and usage. This paper introduces SocioTM model; an extension of TM paradigm that includes relevancies, collaboration, and socio-knowledge (user-specific knowledge/behaviors) within TMs. The paper goes through relevancies implementation in SocioTM, relevancies building and population in SocioTM, relevancies interpretation, presentation, and navigation through SocioTM. Relevancies are presented on two levels: topic/ontology level and information (occurrences) level. The paper concludes with collaboration involvement in SocioTM building and with migration of socio-knowledge.

Publicada em: Tecnologia, Educação
  • Seja o primeiro a comentar

  • Seja a primeira pessoa a gostar disto

SocioTM – Relevancies, Collaboration, and Socio-knowledge in Topic Maps

  1. 1. Саша Рудан Relevancies, Collaboration, and Socio-knowledge in Topic Maps ( [email_address] ) ( [email_address] ) Синаша Рудан Socio TM
  2. 2. Introduction /16 www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig www. KnowledgeFederation .com www. SocioTM .com Poliscopy Knowledge integration www. MemePolis .com www. KnAlledge .com www. Fuzzzy .com www. HeadWareSolutions .com www. MagicWandSolutions .com Independent developers
  3. 3. <ul><li>Users are interested in </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Browsing in meta-data ( knowledge ) space </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>not information space </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Topics that are more relevant </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Users are looking for </li></ul><ul><ul><li>not only knowledge but also </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>something cool, interesting, exciting, unknown </li></ul></ul><ul><li>» la science pour la science « </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Knowledge Isolation </li></ul></ul><ul><li>TM knowledge is hard-typed, it is not fuzzy </li></ul>User/Our Objectives /16 www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig
  4. 4. <ul><li>Ubiquity phenomena </li></ul><ul><li>No talk about recommenders </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Google news, Amazon, MovieLens, etc </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Ranking topics of </li></ul><ul><ul><li>the same class </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>different classes </li></ul></ul>Relevancies, Ranking, Recommenders /16 www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig
  5. 5. <ul><li>Ranking support in TM </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Scopes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Associations </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Problems </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Binary-like concepts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Hardcoded in ontology space </li></ul></ul><ul><li>More fuzzy and general concept is needed </li></ul>State of The Art /16 www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig
  6. 6. <ul><li>Information and meta-data space huge and highly interconnected </li></ul><ul><li>Interconnections important for user </li></ul><ul><li>No need for real-time knowledge rebuilding </li></ul><ul><li>Need for structural concept of knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Users: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Need data ranking and data recommendations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Need to individually affect knowledge and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Preferably even globally </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Able to migrate with aggregated socio-knowledge </li></ul></ul>Problem setting www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  7. 7. SocioTM model <ul><li>Relevancies on </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Occurrence and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Topic map constructs </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Behavioral prediction </li></ul><ul><li>Socio-knowledge migration </li></ul>Our approach <ul><li>Global knowledge structure building </li></ul><ul><li>Unique vs. global knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Mountain view </li></ul><ul><li>View-clipping </li></ul>/16 www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig
  8. 8. <ul><li>Global and Conceptual overview </li></ul>SocioTM Model (continued) www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /12
  9. 9. <ul><li>Implementation </li></ul><ul><li>User implicit feedback </li></ul><ul><li>Relevance evolution </li></ul>Relevance population and creation www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  10. 10. <ul><li>f USER-NORMALIZING = f GROUP-PROFILE x f USER-PROFILE x f ST/LT-INTERESTS x f SEARCH-ITEM x f EXPLICIT-SOCIO-KNOLEDGE x f NAVIGATION x f TIME </li></ul>Relevance Evolution/Normalizing www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  11. 11. <ul><li>Building dynamic SocioTM </li></ul><ul><ul><li>As copy of topic space </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>On-the-fly </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wide normalization </li></ul><ul><ul><li>User profile </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Short-term user interests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Search-item </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>User explicit socio-knowledge </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Normalizing through navigation and time </li></ul>SocioTM Interpretation www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  12. 12. <ul><li>Challenges </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Overloading </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Navigation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Understanding </li></ul></ul><ul><li>View-clipping </li></ul><ul><li>Mountain-view paradigm </li></ul>SocioTM Presentation www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  13. 13. Socio-Potential Law <ul><li>Blue Circle – search location </li></ul><ul><li>Red Ring – browsing location </li></ul><ul><li>a) - initial position, b) after fist navigation step </li></ul><ul><li>a1, b1) - non-evaluated, a2, b2) – evaluated </li></ul>www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  14. 14. <ul><li>Socio-knowledge migration </li></ul><ul><li>Needs for pre-populated user preferences for a new TM </li></ul><ul><li>Needs for global understanding user behaviors </li></ul>Collaboration within Topic Maps www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  15. 15. <ul><li>Introducing SocioTM into the existing systems </li></ul><ul><li>Vertical compatibility </li></ul><ul><li>Standardizing interface </li></ul><ul><li>Proxy implementation </li></ul>SocioTM Implementation www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  16. 16. <ul><li>Extend/add to TM standard </li></ul><ul><li>not just a business-logic module </li></ul><ul><li>Introducing fuzzy, multy-view knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Living, user-affected knowledge </li></ul>Conclusion www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  17. 17. <ul><li>There is no standard defect but it is extension </li></ul><ul><li>Should we bother other users with our opinions? </li></ul><ul><li>Why it should be standard and not just business logic on the top of it? </li></ul>Opened (?) Questions www.SocioTM.com, TMRA 2008, Leipzig /16
  18. 18. <ul><li>Саша Рудан </li></ul>Relevancies, Collaboration, and Socio-knowledge in Topic Maps SocioTM ( [email_address] ) ( [email_address] ) Синаша Рудан T:hank you!

×