SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 35
Baixar para ler offline
PROJECT PRESENTATION
Submitted by –
ABHISHEK GOEL
MAMTA YADAV
PRASHANT PATEL
AMBER KATIYAR
OBJECTIVE:Design of Post-
Tensioned Prestressed Concrete
Tee Beam And Slab Bridge Deck
GUIDE: Dr. J. GIRISH
TYPES OF BRIDGES
Arch
Bridges
Reinforced
Slab
Bridges
CANTILEVER BRIDGE
PRE-TENSIONING AND POST-
TENSIONING
The prestress in a structure is influenced by
either of the two processes:
 Pre-tensioning
 Post-tensioning
ADVANTAGES OF PRESTRESSED
CONCRETE
 Section remains un-cracked under service loads
 Reduction of steel corrosion
 Increase in durability.
 Full section is utilized
 Higher moment of inertia (higher stiffness)
 Less deformations (improved serviceability).
 Increase in shear capacity
 Suitable for use in pressure vessels, liquid retaining structures.
 Improved performance (resilience) under dynamic and fatigue loading.
 B) High span-to-depth ratios
 Larger spans possible with prestressing (bridges, buildings with large column-
free spaces)
 For the same span, less depth compared to RC member.
 Reduction in self weight
 More aesthetic appeal due to slender sections
 More economical sections.
DISADVANTAGES OF PRESTRESS
CONCRETE
 If wires/strands are stressed individually
inside the Prestressing needs skilled
technology. Hence, it is not as common as
reinforced concrete.
 The use of high strength materials is costly.
 There is additional cost in auxiliary
equipments.
 There is need for quality control and
inspection.
DESIGN OF BRIDGE
TYPE OF LOADING
CLASS AA LOADING
REFERENCE PROBLEM:-
DESIGN OF POST –TENSIONED PRESTRESSED
CONCRETE TEE BEAM AND SLAB BRIDGE DECK
FOR A NATIONAL HIGHWAY CROSSING TO
SUIT THE FOLLOWING –
GIVEN DATA :
 EFFECTIVE SPAN= 30m
 WIDTH OF ROAD= 7.5m
 KERBS= 600mm on each side
 FOOTPATH= 1.5m wide on each side
 THICKNESS OF WEARING COAT= 80mm
 LIVE LOAD= I.R.C class AA tracked
vehicle
 For deck slab , adopt M20 grade concrete
for prestressed concrete girders , adopt
M50 grade concrete with cube strength at
transfer as 40N/mm2.
 Loss ratio= 0.85
 Spacing of cross girder= 5m
 Adopt Fe-415 grade HYSD bars
 Strands of 15.2mm – 7ply conforming to
IS:6006-1983 are available for use.
DESIGN THE GIRDERS AS CLASS I
TYPE MEMBERS
Permissible stresses:
For M20 grade concrete and Fe-415 grade Hysd bars (IRC:
21-2000)
σ cb= 6.7N/mm2
σ st= 200N/mm2
m= 10
n=[1/(1+((σ st)/(m×σ cb)) )]=0.25 ; j=(1-n/3)=0.916
 Q= 0.5 σ cb nj = 0.767
 For M50 grade concrete (I.R.C:18-2000)
 fck=50N/mm2
 fci=40N/mm2
 fct=0.45fci=(0.45 *40) =18N/mm2
 fw=0.33fck =(0.33*50) = 16N/mm2
 ftt=ftw =0 (clss 1 type member)
Ec= 5700 𝑓𝑐𝑘 =5700 √50 = 40305 N/mm2= 40KN/mm2
CROSS-SECTION OF DECK :
4 main girdes are provided at 2.5 m intervals.
Thickness of deck slab =250mm
Wearing coat= 80mm
Kerbs 60mm wide by 300mm deep are provided.
 The main girders are precast & the slab connecting the girders is CAST IN SITU.
Spacing of cross girders= 5m
Spacing of main girders= 2.5m
MODULUS OF ELASTICITY OF CONCRETE IN GIRDERS
DESIGN OF INTERIOR SLAB PANEL
1. BENDING MOMENT
Dead wt. of slab =(1x1x0.25x24)= 64KN/m2
Dead wt. of W.C.= (0.08x22x1x1)= 1.76KN/m2
Total dead load= 7.76KN/m2
Live load is IRC class AA tracked vehicle , one wheel is placed at the
center of the panel.
V=3.7 m
B=2.5m
𝑢 = 𝑥 + 2 × 𝐷 = 0.85 + 2 × 0.08 = 1.01𝑚
X=wheel load contact area along the
span
D=Depth of the wearing coatU=effective length of load dispersion
v=(x'+2 × D)=(3.6+2×0.08)=3.76m
X=1.01m
X=0.85m
350KN
80mm
80mm
360KN
X=3.76m
X=3.6m
(U/B)=(1.01/2.5)=0.404
(V/L)=(3.76/5.0)=0.752
K=B/L=2.5/5.0=0.5
Referring to Pigeaud’s curves
m1=0.098 & m2=0.02
MB=W(m1+0.15m1)
=350(0.098+0.15x0.02)=35.35KNm
Similarily, ML=W(m2+.15m1)
=350(0.02+0.15x0.098)=12.14KNm
As the slab is continuous, design
BM=0.8M. Design B.M. , including Impact & continuity factor is given by:
MB(short span)=(1.25x0.8x35.35)=35.35KNm
ML(long span)=(1.25x0.8x12.14)=12.14KNm
SHEAR FORCE
Dispersion in the direction of the
span=[0.85+2(0.08+0.25)]=1.51m
For maxm shear , load is kept such that the whole dispersion is in
the span. So , the load is kept at (1.51/2)=0.755m from the edge of
the beam.
Effective width of slab =𝐾𝑥 1 −
𝑥
2
+ 𝑏𝑤 on which the load acts
Where,
L=effective span
X=Distance of center of gravity of load from nearer support
bw=track contact area cover the road surface of the slab in a direction at
right angles to the span plus twice the thickness of the wearing coat or
the surface finish above the structural slab.
K=A constant depending upon (B/L) ratio.
Breadth of cross girder= 20mm
Clear length of panel=(5-0.2)=4.8m
(B/L)=(4.8/2.3)=2.08
K for continuous slab obtained as 2.6
Effective width of slab=2.6 × 0.755 1 −
0.755
2.3
+ 3.6 + 2 × 0.08 = 5.079𝑚
Load per metre width=(350/5.079)=70KN
Shear force/meter width= 70 2.3 − 0.755 ÷ 2.3 = 47𝐾𝑁
Shear force with impact=(1.25x47)=58.75Kn
Design moments & Shear forces
Total MB=(35.35+3.76)=39.11KNm
Total ML=(12.14+1.32)=13.46KNm
Design of slab section & reinforcement
Effective depth d =
𝑀
𝑄×𝑏
= 39.11 × 106
0.767 × 1000
Adopt effective depth d=230mm
Ast =
𝑀
𝜎𝑠𝑡×𝑗×𝑑
= 39.11 × 106
÷ 200 × 0.916 × 230 = 928𝑚𝑚2
But min. reinforcement using HYSD bars according to IRC:18-2000 is 0.15% of
cross section .
Hence,
Ast=(0.0015x1000x250)=375mm2
Use 10mm dia. bars at 150mm centres (Ast=524mm2) for crack control(IRC21-
2000)
Check for shear stess(As per IRC:21-2003)
Nominal shear stress= ɽv=(v/bd)= 58.75 × 103
÷ 1000 × 230 = 0.255𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
At support section Ast=942mm2
Hence the ratio 100𝐴 𝑠𝑡/𝑏𝑑 =(100x942)/(1000x230)=0.40
From Table 12B of IRC:21-2000 & Table 12C of IRC:21-2000
The permissible shear stress in concrete slab = Kɽv=(1.1x0.25)=0.275 N/mm2
Kɽv>ɽv=0.255N/mm2
Design of longitudinal girders
(a)Reaction Factors:
Using Courbon’s Theory , the I.R.C. class AA loads are arranged for max. eccentricity.
Courbon’s method is popular due to smilicity of computations as detailed below:-
When live loads are positione nearer to the kerb the centre of gravity of live load acts
eccentrically with the centre of gravity of girder system. Due to this eccentricity, the loads
shared by each girder is increased or decresed depending upon the position of girders. This is
calculated by Courbon’s theory by a reaction factor given by :
Rx
∑𝑊
𝑛
[1 +
∑𝐼
∑𝑑 𝑥
2.𝐼
𝑑 𝑥. 𝑒
The live load bending moments & shear forces are computed for each of the girders. The
maximum design moments & shear forces are obtained by adding the live load & dead load
bending moments . The reinforcements in the main longitudinal girders are designed for
the maximum moments and shears developed in the girders
e
1.2m
kerb
dx
0.85
W
W
kerb
kerb
W1 W1
W
e=1.1m
A B C D
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
2.05m1.625 m
Reaction factor for outer girder A is
RA=
RA=0.764W1
Reaction factor for inner girder B is
RB=
RB=0.588W1
If W= A x Le load =700KN
W1=0.5W = 350KN
RA=0.764 x W1=0.764 x 350 = 267.4=0.382 W
RB=(0.588 x 0.5 W) = 0.294 W = 102.9
Dead load from slab
per girder
1.5m
7.5m
1000
300
250
180 mm wc
250mmRC slab
Footpath
Weight of :
Parapet railing (lumpsum) = 0.92KN/m
Footh path & kerb =(0.3 x 1.5 x 24) = 10.08KN/m
Deck slab = (0.25 x 1.5 x 24) = 9.00KN/m
20KN/m
Total dead load of deck =[(2 x 20)+(7.76 x 7.5)]=98.2 KN/m
It is assumed that the deck load is shared equally by all the 4
girders .
Dead load /girder = (98.2/4) = 24.55KN/m
Dead load of main girder
1800
500
300
200
200
200
1200
200
The overall depth of the girder is assumed as
1800mm at the rate of 60mm per meter of span .
Span of the girder =30m.
Overall depth=(60 x 30)=1800mm
The bottom flange is selected so that 4 to 6 cables
are easily accommodated in the flange.
The section of main girder selected is as shown in
the figure.
Dead weight of rib = (0.2 x 1.15 x 24)=5.52KN/m
Dead weight of bottom flange= (0.5 x 0.4 x
24)=4.80= 10.32 KN/m
Weight of cross girder = (0.2 x 1.25 x 24)= 6KN/m
(assuming rectangular section)
Cross-section of the main girder is assumed for calculations.
1800
1200
1150
400
200
500
Dead load moments & shear in main
girders
Reaction from deck slab on each girder = 24.55 KN/m
Weight of cross girder = 6KN/m
Reaction on main girder =(6 x 2.5) = 15KN/m
Self weight of main girder = 10.32KN/m
Total dead load on girder =(24.55+10.32) = 34.87 KN/m
The max. dead load bending moment & shear force is computed
using the loads as shown in figure:
5m
30m
15KN
Mmax=[(0.126 ×34.87 × 302)+(0.25×15 ×30)+(15×10)+(15×5) ]=4261KNm
Dead load shear at support
Vmax= [(0.5 ×34.87×30)+(0.5×75) ]=561KN
Live load bending moment in girder
Span of girder = 30m
Impact factor (class AA) =10%
The live load is placed centrally on the span
Bending Moment at centre of span = 0.5(6.6+7.5) *700 =4935
kN.m
B.M including impact and reaction factors for outer girders is,
Live load B.M.=(4935*1.18*0.382) = 2074 kN.m
For Inner girder, B.M.= (4935*1.1*0.294) =1596 kN.m
Live Load Shear force in Girder
For estimating the live load in the girders, the I.R.C. class AA loads
are placed as
Shown in the fig 6.11
Reaction of W2 on girder B = (350*0.45)/2.5 =63 kN
Reaction of W2 on girder A=(350+63) =413 kN
Total load on girder B =(350+63)= 413 kN
Maximum reaction in girder B =(413*28.2)/30 =388 kN
Maximum reaction on girder A = (287*28.2)/30 =270 kN
Maximum live load shear with impact factor in inner girder =
(388*1.1) =427 kN
Our girder = (270 *1.1) =297 kN
Design Bending Moments and shear forces
Table - Abstract of design moments and shear Forces in main Girders
Bendin
g
Moment
D.L.B.M L.L.B.M TOTAL
B.M.
UNITS
OUTER
GIRDER
INNER
GIRDER
4261
4261
2074
1596
6335
5857
KN.m
KN.m
SHEAR
FORCE
D.L.S.F. L.L.S.F. TOTAL
S.F.
UNITS
OUTER
GIRDER
INNER
GIRDER
561
561
297
427
858
988
KN
KN
Properties Of Main Girder Section
The main girder section is as shown in for computational purpose. The
properties of the section are:
A = 73 × 104 mm2
Y1 = 750 mm,
Y b = 1050 mm,
I = 2924×108 mm4
Z1 = (I / Y b ) = ( 2924 × 10 8 ) / 750 = 3.89×108 mm4
Z b = (I / Y b ) = ( 2924 × 108 ) / 1050 = 2.78×108 mm4
(i) Check for Minimum Section Modulus
Fc k = 50 N/mm2 ɳ = 18 N/mm2
Fc t = 18 N/mm2 Mg =4261N/mm2
Fc i = 40 N/mm2 Mq = 2074kN.m
Ft t = Ft w = 0
Md = (Mg + Mq) = 6335 KN.m
Fcw = 16N/mm2
Fbr = (ɳfct – ftw) =n(.85 ×18 – 0) = 15.3 N/mm2
Ftr = (Fcw = ɳftt) = 16N/mm2
Finf = (ftw/ɳ) + (Md/ɳzb) = 0+ (6335 × 106)/(.85 ×2.78 ×108) = 26.80 N/mm2
Zb = Mq + (1- ɳ)Mg = (1.77×108 mm3< 2.78 ×108)
Hence the section provided is adequate.
Pre stressing Forces
Allowing for two rows of cable, cover required =200 mm
Maximum possible eccentricity e = (1050 – 200) = 850 mm
Pre stressing force is obtained as
P = (A.finf .Zb)/(Zb + A.e)
= [(.73 × 106 ×26.80 ×2.78 ×108)/(2.78 ×108) +(.73 ×106V850)]
= 6053 ×103 N
= 6053 KN
Using Freyssinet system, anchorage type 7K-15 (7strands of 15.2
mm diameter) in
65 mm
Cables ducts, (IS: 6006-1983)
Force in each cable = (7 ×.8 ×260.7) = 1459 KN
Number of cables = (6053/1459) =5
Area of each strand = 140mm2
Area of 7 strands in each cable (7 ×140) = 980 mm2
Area of strands in 5 cable = Ap = (5 ×980) = 4900 mm2
The cables are arranged at centre of span sections
Permissible Tendon Zone
At support section,
e ≤ (Zb.fct/P) – (Zb/A)
≤(2.78 ×108 ×18)/(6053 ×103) – (2.78 ×108)/(.73 ×106)
≤ 445 mm
e ≥ (Zb.ftw/ɳP) – (Zb/A)
≥ 0 – (2.78 ×108)/(.73 ×106)
≥ -380 mm
The 5 cables are arranged to follow a parabolic
profile with the resultant force having an
eccentricity of 180 mm towards the soffit at the
support section. The position of cables at support
section
Check for Stresses
For the centre of span section, we have
P = 6053 KN
e = 850 mm
A = 0.73 ×106 mm2
Zb = 2.78 ×108 mm3
Zt = 3.89 ×108 mm3
H = 0.85
Mg = 4261 KN.m
Mq = 2074 kN.m
(P/A) = (6053 ×103)(.73 ×106) = 8.29 N/mm2
(Pe/zt) = (6053 ×103 ×850)/(3.89 ×108) = 13.22N/mm2
(Pe/Zb) = (6053 ×103 ×850)/(2.78 ×108) = 18.50 N/mm2
(Mg/Zt) = (4261 ×106) /(3.89 ×108) = 10.95 N/mm2
(Mg/Zb)= (4261 ×106) /(2.78 ×108) = 15.32 N/mm2
(Mq/Zt) = (2074 ×106) /(3.89 ×108) = 5.33 N/mm2
(Mq/Zb) = (2074 ×106) /(2.78 ×108) = 7.46 N/mm2
At transfer stage :
σt = [(P/A) - (Pe/zt) + (Mg/Zt) = (8.29 – 13.22 + 10.95)
= 6.02 N/mm2
σb = [(P/A) +(Pe/Zb) -(Mg/Zb)] = (8.29 + 18.50 – 15.32]
= 11.47 N/mm2
At working load stage:
σt = [ɳ(P/A) - ɳ(Pe/zb) - (Mg/Zt)+ (Mg/Zt)]
= [0.85 (8.29 – 13.22) + 10.95 + 5.33]
= 12.09 N/mm2(compression)
σb = [ɳ(P/A) - (Pe/Zb) - (Mg/Zb)+ (Mq/Zb)]
= [0.85(8.29 + 18.50) – 15.32 – 7.46]
= -0.01 N/mm2(Tension)
All the stresses at top and bottom fibres at transfer and
service loads are well within the safe permissible limits.
THANK YOU

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABS
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABSANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABS
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABSila vamsi krishna
 
ANALYSIS OF FRAMES USING SLOPE DEFLECTION METHOD
ANALYSIS OF FRAMES USING SLOPE DEFLECTION METHODANALYSIS OF FRAMES USING SLOPE DEFLECTION METHOD
ANALYSIS OF FRAMES USING SLOPE DEFLECTION METHODSagar Kaptan
 
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma ABHISHEK SHARMA
 
BIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGN
BIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGNBIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGN
BIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGNshawon_sb
 
Under reamed pile construction (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
Under reamed pile construction (usefulsearch.org)  (useful search)Under reamed pile construction (usefulsearch.org)  (useful search)
Under reamed pile construction (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)Make Mannan
 
Introduction & under ground water tank problem
Introduction & under ground water tank problemIntroduction & under ground water tank problem
Introduction & under ground water tank problemdhineshkumar002
 
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...Make Mannan
 
Design of shallow foundation slide share
Design of shallow foundation   slide shareDesign of shallow foundation   slide share
Design of shallow foundation slide sharezameer1979
 
Structural analysis 2
Structural analysis   2Structural analysis   2
Structural analysis 2R VIJAYAKUMAR
 
Truss & its analysis
Truss & its analysisTruss & its analysis
Truss & its analysisSunil Kumar
 
Unit 4 stiffness-anujajape
Unit 4 stiffness-anujajapeUnit 4 stiffness-anujajape
Unit 4 stiffness-anujajapeanujajape
 
Uniaxial Column Design
Uniaxial Column DesignUniaxial Column Design
Uniaxial Column DesignIkhtiar Khan
 

Mais procurados (20)

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABS
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABSANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABS
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABS
 
Eccentric connections in steel structure
Eccentric connections in steel structureEccentric connections in steel structure
Eccentric connections in steel structure
 
ANALYSIS OF FRAMES USING SLOPE DEFLECTION METHOD
ANALYSIS OF FRAMES USING SLOPE DEFLECTION METHODANALYSIS OF FRAMES USING SLOPE DEFLECTION METHOD
ANALYSIS OF FRAMES USING SLOPE DEFLECTION METHOD
 
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
 
BIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGN
BIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGNBIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGN
BIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGN
 
Design wind load
Design wind loadDesign wind load
Design wind load
 
Under reamed pile construction (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
Under reamed pile construction (usefulsearch.org)  (useful search)Under reamed pile construction (usefulsearch.org)  (useful search)
Under reamed pile construction (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
 
Design of columns as per IS 456-2000
Design of columns as per IS 456-2000Design of columns as per IS 456-2000
Design of columns as per IS 456-2000
 
Introduction & under ground water tank problem
Introduction & under ground water tank problemIntroduction & under ground water tank problem
Introduction & under ground water tank problem
 
Beam design
Beam designBeam design
Beam design
 
Matrix methods
Matrix methodsMatrix methods
Matrix methods
 
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
 
Design of shallow foundation slide share
Design of shallow foundation   slide shareDesign of shallow foundation   slide share
Design of shallow foundation slide share
 
Structural analysis 2
Structural analysis   2Structural analysis   2
Structural analysis 2
 
Truss & its analysis
Truss & its analysisTruss & its analysis
Truss & its analysis
 
Bridge loading
Bridge loadingBridge loading
Bridge loading
 
Unit 4 stiffness-anujajape
Unit 4 stiffness-anujajapeUnit 4 stiffness-anujajape
Unit 4 stiffness-anujajape
 
Uniaxial Column Design
Uniaxial Column DesignUniaxial Column Design
Uniaxial Column Design
 
staad pro
staad prostaad pro
staad pro
 
Guntry girder
Guntry girderGuntry girder
Guntry girder
 

Destaque

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM USING FRP TENDON
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM USING FRP TENDONFINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM USING FRP TENDON
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM USING FRP TENDONGirish Singh
 
Capstone Project Presentation Final-Revised - AE
Capstone Project Presentation Final-Revised - AECapstone Project Presentation Final-Revised - AE
Capstone Project Presentation Final-Revised - AEJunaid Khan
 
Prestressed concrete Course assignments, 2015
Prestressed concrete Course assignments, 2015Prestressed concrete Course assignments, 2015
Prestressed concrete Course assignments, 2015JanneHanka
 
Modal and harmonic analysis of tapered composite i
Modal and harmonic analysis of tapered composite iModal and harmonic analysis of tapered composite i
Modal and harmonic analysis of tapered composite iSRINIVASULU N V
 
Pt group presentation 2013
Pt group presentation 2013Pt group presentation 2013
Pt group presentation 2013Rabee Nassar
 
Sterling PT Pvt. Ltd. (PAKISTAN)
Sterling PT Pvt. Ltd. (PAKISTAN)Sterling PT Pvt. Ltd. (PAKISTAN)
Sterling PT Pvt. Ltd. (PAKISTAN)Aamir Sharif
 
Project Design Report
Project Design ReportProject Design Report
Project Design ReportTaylor Wilson
 
Infrastructure and Unbonded Post Tensioning
Infrastructure and Unbonded Post TensioningInfrastructure and Unbonded Post Tensioning
Infrastructure and Unbonded Post TensioningAMSYSCO Inc.
 
Analysis of continuous prestressed concrete
Analysis of continuous prestressed concreteAnalysis of continuous prestressed concrete
Analysis of continuous prestressed concreteSRAVANTHI mehar
 
What Is Post Tensioning
What Is Post TensioningWhat Is Post Tensioning
What Is Post TensioningAMSYSCO Inc.
 
Design of Prestressed Concrete - &lt;topic>
Design of Prestressed Concrete  - &lt;topic>Design of Prestressed Concrete  - &lt;topic>
Design of Prestressed Concrete - &lt;topic>S M Rahat Rahman
 
Prestresses concrete
Prestresses concrete Prestresses concrete
Prestresses concrete jaiveer singh
 
Post tensioning in building structures
Post tensioning in building structuresPost tensioning in building structures
Post tensioning in building structuresLuan Truong Van
 
Mega prefab post tension catalog
Mega prefab post tension catalog Mega prefab post tension catalog
Mega prefab post tension catalog bassamnakfour
 

Destaque (20)

Final Report (Group 5)
Final Report (Group 5)Final Report (Group 5)
Final Report (Group 5)
 
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM USING FRP TENDON
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM USING FRP TENDONFINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM USING FRP TENDON
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM USING FRP TENDON
 
Prestressed Concrete Design
Prestressed Concrete DesignPrestressed Concrete Design
Prestressed Concrete Design
 
BIG BEAM 2014-2015
BIG BEAM 2014-2015BIG BEAM 2014-2015
BIG BEAM 2014-2015
 
Capstone Project Presentation Final-Revised - AE
Capstone Project Presentation Final-Revised - AECapstone Project Presentation Final-Revised - AE
Capstone Project Presentation Final-Revised - AE
 
Prestressed concrete Course assignments, 2015
Prestressed concrete Course assignments, 2015Prestressed concrete Course assignments, 2015
Prestressed concrete Course assignments, 2015
 
Modal and harmonic analysis of tapered composite i
Modal and harmonic analysis of tapered composite iModal and harmonic analysis of tapered composite i
Modal and harmonic analysis of tapered composite i
 
Pt group presentation 2013
Pt group presentation 2013Pt group presentation 2013
Pt group presentation 2013
 
presentation
presentationpresentation
presentation
 
Sterling PT Pvt. Ltd. (PAKISTAN)
Sterling PT Pvt. Ltd. (PAKISTAN)Sterling PT Pvt. Ltd. (PAKISTAN)
Sterling PT Pvt. Ltd. (PAKISTAN)
 
Project Design Report
Project Design ReportProject Design Report
Project Design Report
 
FinalReport
FinalReportFinalReport
FinalReport
 
Infrastructure and Unbonded Post Tensioning
Infrastructure and Unbonded Post TensioningInfrastructure and Unbonded Post Tensioning
Infrastructure and Unbonded Post Tensioning
 
Analysis of continuous prestressed concrete
Analysis of continuous prestressed concreteAnalysis of continuous prestressed concrete
Analysis of continuous prestressed concrete
 
What Is Post Tensioning
What Is Post TensioningWhat Is Post Tensioning
What Is Post Tensioning
 
Design of Prestressed Concrete - &lt;topic>
Design of Prestressed Concrete  - &lt;topic>Design of Prestressed Concrete  - &lt;topic>
Design of Prestressed Concrete - &lt;topic>
 
Prestresses concrete
Prestresses concrete Prestresses concrete
Prestresses concrete
 
Post tensioning in building structures
Post tensioning in building structuresPost tensioning in building structures
Post tensioning in building structures
 
Mega prefab post tension catalog
Mega prefab post tension catalog Mega prefab post tension catalog
Mega prefab post tension catalog
 
Ppt
PptPpt
Ppt
 

Semelhante a Design ppt

DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERINGDESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERINGLiyaWilson4
 
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING GANTRY GIRDER
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING  GANTRY GIRDERINDUSTRIAL BUILDING  GANTRY GIRDER
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING GANTRY GIRDERHarsh Shani
 
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdfLecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdfAberaMamoJaleta
 
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rLec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rMUST,Mirpur AJK,Pakistan
 
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOFCASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOFRituraj Dhar
 
Design of SR Framed str beam.ppt
Design of SR Framed str beam.pptDesign of SR Framed str beam.ppt
Design of SR Framed str beam.pptProfKaushalParikh
 
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM Pavan Kumar
 
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxDP NITHIN
 
Design of footing
Design of footingDesign of footing
Design of footingNripeshJha
 
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their ComparisonDesign of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their ComparisonIRJESJOURNAL
 
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowStructural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowAnchit Agrawal
 
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdfephrem53
 
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank designHarish Mahavar
 
Foundation Reinforcement Calcs & Connection Calcs
Foundation Reinforcement Calcs & Connection CalcsFoundation Reinforcement Calcs & Connection Calcs
Foundation Reinforcement Calcs & Connection CalcsMagdel Kotze
 
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rLec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rCivil Zone
 

Semelhante a Design ppt (20)

unit-3.ppt
unit-3.pptunit-3.ppt
unit-3.ppt
 
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERINGDESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
 
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING GANTRY GIRDER
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING  GANTRY GIRDERINDUSTRIAL BUILDING  GANTRY GIRDER
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING GANTRY GIRDER
 
singly-reinforced-beam.ppt
singly-reinforced-beam.pptsingly-reinforced-beam.ppt
singly-reinforced-beam.ppt
 
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdfLecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
 
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rLec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
 
presentation1_28.pptx
presentation1_28.pptxpresentation1_28.pptx
presentation1_28.pptx
 
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOFCASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
 
Design of SR Framed str beam.ppt
Design of SR Framed str beam.pptDesign of SR Framed str beam.ppt
Design of SR Framed str beam.ppt
 
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
 
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
 
Footing design
Footing designFooting design
Footing design
 
Design of footing
Design of footingDesign of footing
Design of footing
 
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their ComparisonDesign of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
 
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowStructural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
 
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
 
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
 
Foundation Reinforcement Calcs & Connection Calcs
Foundation Reinforcement Calcs & Connection CalcsFoundation Reinforcement Calcs & Connection Calcs
Foundation Reinforcement Calcs & Connection Calcs
 
Lec 13-14-15
Lec 13-14-15Lec 13-14-15
Lec 13-14-15
 
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rLec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
 

Design ppt

  • 1. PROJECT PRESENTATION Submitted by – ABHISHEK GOEL MAMTA YADAV PRASHANT PATEL AMBER KATIYAR
  • 2. OBJECTIVE:Design of Post- Tensioned Prestressed Concrete Tee Beam And Slab Bridge Deck GUIDE: Dr. J. GIRISH
  • 4. PRE-TENSIONING AND POST- TENSIONING The prestress in a structure is influenced by either of the two processes:  Pre-tensioning  Post-tensioning
  • 5. ADVANTAGES OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE  Section remains un-cracked under service loads  Reduction of steel corrosion  Increase in durability.  Full section is utilized  Higher moment of inertia (higher stiffness)  Less deformations (improved serviceability).  Increase in shear capacity  Suitable for use in pressure vessels, liquid retaining structures.  Improved performance (resilience) under dynamic and fatigue loading.  B) High span-to-depth ratios  Larger spans possible with prestressing (bridges, buildings with large column- free spaces)  For the same span, less depth compared to RC member.  Reduction in self weight  More aesthetic appeal due to slender sections  More economical sections.
  • 6. DISADVANTAGES OF PRESTRESS CONCRETE  If wires/strands are stressed individually inside the Prestressing needs skilled technology. Hence, it is not as common as reinforced concrete.  The use of high strength materials is costly.  There is additional cost in auxiliary equipments.  There is need for quality control and inspection.
  • 7. DESIGN OF BRIDGE TYPE OF LOADING CLASS AA LOADING
  • 8. REFERENCE PROBLEM:- DESIGN OF POST –TENSIONED PRESTRESSED CONCRETE TEE BEAM AND SLAB BRIDGE DECK FOR A NATIONAL HIGHWAY CROSSING TO SUIT THE FOLLOWING –
  • 9. GIVEN DATA :  EFFECTIVE SPAN= 30m  WIDTH OF ROAD= 7.5m  KERBS= 600mm on each side  FOOTPATH= 1.5m wide on each side  THICKNESS OF WEARING COAT= 80mm  LIVE LOAD= I.R.C class AA tracked vehicle
  • 10.  For deck slab , adopt M20 grade concrete for prestressed concrete girders , adopt M50 grade concrete with cube strength at transfer as 40N/mm2.  Loss ratio= 0.85  Spacing of cross girder= 5m  Adopt Fe-415 grade HYSD bars  Strands of 15.2mm – 7ply conforming to IS:6006-1983 are available for use.
  • 11. DESIGN THE GIRDERS AS CLASS I TYPE MEMBERS Permissible stresses: For M20 grade concrete and Fe-415 grade Hysd bars (IRC: 21-2000) σ cb= 6.7N/mm2 σ st= 200N/mm2 m= 10 n=[1/(1+((σ st)/(m×σ cb)) )]=0.25 ; j=(1-n/3)=0.916  Q= 0.5 σ cb nj = 0.767  For M50 grade concrete (I.R.C:18-2000)  fck=50N/mm2  fci=40N/mm2  fct=0.45fci=(0.45 *40) =18N/mm2  fw=0.33fck =(0.33*50) = 16N/mm2  ftt=ftw =0 (clss 1 type member)
  • 12. Ec= 5700 𝑓𝑐𝑘 =5700 √50 = 40305 N/mm2= 40KN/mm2 CROSS-SECTION OF DECK : 4 main girdes are provided at 2.5 m intervals. Thickness of deck slab =250mm Wearing coat= 80mm Kerbs 60mm wide by 300mm deep are provided.  The main girders are precast & the slab connecting the girders is CAST IN SITU. Spacing of cross girders= 5m Spacing of main girders= 2.5m MODULUS OF ELASTICITY OF CONCRETE IN GIRDERS
  • 13. DESIGN OF INTERIOR SLAB PANEL 1. BENDING MOMENT Dead wt. of slab =(1x1x0.25x24)= 64KN/m2 Dead wt. of W.C.= (0.08x22x1x1)= 1.76KN/m2 Total dead load= 7.76KN/m2 Live load is IRC class AA tracked vehicle , one wheel is placed at the center of the panel. V=3.7 m B=2.5m
  • 14. 𝑢 = 𝑥 + 2 × 𝐷 = 0.85 + 2 × 0.08 = 1.01𝑚 X=wheel load contact area along the span D=Depth of the wearing coatU=effective length of load dispersion v=(x'+2 × D)=(3.6+2×0.08)=3.76m X=1.01m X=0.85m 350KN 80mm 80mm 360KN X=3.76m X=3.6m
  • 15. (U/B)=(1.01/2.5)=0.404 (V/L)=(3.76/5.0)=0.752 K=B/L=2.5/5.0=0.5 Referring to Pigeaud’s curves m1=0.098 & m2=0.02 MB=W(m1+0.15m1) =350(0.098+0.15x0.02)=35.35KNm Similarily, ML=W(m2+.15m1) =350(0.02+0.15x0.098)=12.14KNm As the slab is continuous, design BM=0.8M. Design B.M. , including Impact & continuity factor is given by: MB(short span)=(1.25x0.8x35.35)=35.35KNm ML(long span)=(1.25x0.8x12.14)=12.14KNm
  • 16. SHEAR FORCE Dispersion in the direction of the span=[0.85+2(0.08+0.25)]=1.51m For maxm shear , load is kept such that the whole dispersion is in the span. So , the load is kept at (1.51/2)=0.755m from the edge of the beam.
  • 17. Effective width of slab =𝐾𝑥 1 − 𝑥 2 + 𝑏𝑤 on which the load acts Where, L=effective span X=Distance of center of gravity of load from nearer support bw=track contact area cover the road surface of the slab in a direction at right angles to the span plus twice the thickness of the wearing coat or the surface finish above the structural slab. K=A constant depending upon (B/L) ratio. Breadth of cross girder= 20mm Clear length of panel=(5-0.2)=4.8m (B/L)=(4.8/2.3)=2.08 K for continuous slab obtained as 2.6 Effective width of slab=2.6 × 0.755 1 − 0.755 2.3 + 3.6 + 2 × 0.08 = 5.079𝑚 Load per metre width=(350/5.079)=70KN Shear force/meter width= 70 2.3 − 0.755 ÷ 2.3 = 47𝐾𝑁 Shear force with impact=(1.25x47)=58.75Kn
  • 18. Design moments & Shear forces Total MB=(35.35+3.76)=39.11KNm Total ML=(12.14+1.32)=13.46KNm Design of slab section & reinforcement Effective depth d = 𝑀 𝑄×𝑏 = 39.11 × 106 0.767 × 1000 Adopt effective depth d=230mm Ast = 𝑀 𝜎𝑠𝑡×𝑗×𝑑 = 39.11 × 106 ÷ 200 × 0.916 × 230 = 928𝑚𝑚2 But min. reinforcement using HYSD bars according to IRC:18-2000 is 0.15% of cross section . Hence, Ast=(0.0015x1000x250)=375mm2 Use 10mm dia. bars at 150mm centres (Ast=524mm2) for crack control(IRC21- 2000)
  • 19. Check for shear stess(As per IRC:21-2003) Nominal shear stress= ɽv=(v/bd)= 58.75 × 103 ÷ 1000 × 230 = 0.255𝑁/𝑚𝑚2 At support section Ast=942mm2 Hence the ratio 100𝐴 𝑠𝑡/𝑏𝑑 =(100x942)/(1000x230)=0.40 From Table 12B of IRC:21-2000 & Table 12C of IRC:21-2000 The permissible shear stress in concrete slab = Kɽv=(1.1x0.25)=0.275 N/mm2 Kɽv>ɽv=0.255N/mm2 Design of longitudinal girders (a)Reaction Factors: Using Courbon’s Theory , the I.R.C. class AA loads are arranged for max. eccentricity. Courbon’s method is popular due to smilicity of computations as detailed below:- When live loads are positione nearer to the kerb the centre of gravity of live load acts eccentrically with the centre of gravity of girder system. Due to this eccentricity, the loads shared by each girder is increased or decresed depending upon the position of girders. This is calculated by Courbon’s theory by a reaction factor given by : Rx ∑𝑊 𝑛 [1 + ∑𝐼 ∑𝑑 𝑥 2.𝐼 𝑑 𝑥. 𝑒
  • 20. The live load bending moments & shear forces are computed for each of the girders. The maximum design moments & shear forces are obtained by adding the live load & dead load bending moments . The reinforcements in the main longitudinal girders are designed for the maximum moments and shears developed in the girders e 1.2m kerb dx 0.85 W W
  • 21. kerb kerb W1 W1 W e=1.1m A B C D 2.5m 2.5m 2.5m 2.05m1.625 m Reaction factor for outer girder A is RA= RA=0.764W1 Reaction factor for inner girder B is RB= RB=0.588W1 If W= A x Le load =700KN W1=0.5W = 350KN RA=0.764 x W1=0.764 x 350 = 267.4=0.382 W RB=(0.588 x 0.5 W) = 0.294 W = 102.9
  • 22. Dead load from slab per girder 1.5m 7.5m 1000 300 250 180 mm wc 250mmRC slab Footpath Weight of : Parapet railing (lumpsum) = 0.92KN/m Footh path & kerb =(0.3 x 1.5 x 24) = 10.08KN/m Deck slab = (0.25 x 1.5 x 24) = 9.00KN/m 20KN/m Total dead load of deck =[(2 x 20)+(7.76 x 7.5)]=98.2 KN/m It is assumed that the deck load is shared equally by all the 4 girders . Dead load /girder = (98.2/4) = 24.55KN/m
  • 23. Dead load of main girder 1800 500 300 200 200 200 1200 200
  • 24. The overall depth of the girder is assumed as 1800mm at the rate of 60mm per meter of span . Span of the girder =30m. Overall depth=(60 x 30)=1800mm The bottom flange is selected so that 4 to 6 cables are easily accommodated in the flange. The section of main girder selected is as shown in the figure. Dead weight of rib = (0.2 x 1.15 x 24)=5.52KN/m Dead weight of bottom flange= (0.5 x 0.4 x 24)=4.80= 10.32 KN/m Weight of cross girder = (0.2 x 1.25 x 24)= 6KN/m (assuming rectangular section)
  • 25. Cross-section of the main girder is assumed for calculations. 1800 1200 1150 400 200 500
  • 26. Dead load moments & shear in main girders Reaction from deck slab on each girder = 24.55 KN/m Weight of cross girder = 6KN/m Reaction on main girder =(6 x 2.5) = 15KN/m Self weight of main girder = 10.32KN/m Total dead load on girder =(24.55+10.32) = 34.87 KN/m The max. dead load bending moment & shear force is computed using the loads as shown in figure:
  • 27. 5m 30m 15KN Mmax=[(0.126 ×34.87 × 302)+(0.25×15 ×30)+(15×10)+(15×5) ]=4261KNm Dead load shear at support Vmax= [(0.5 ×34.87×30)+(0.5×75) ]=561KN Live load bending moment in girder Span of girder = 30m Impact factor (class AA) =10% The live load is placed centrally on the span
  • 28. Bending Moment at centre of span = 0.5(6.6+7.5) *700 =4935 kN.m B.M including impact and reaction factors for outer girders is, Live load B.M.=(4935*1.18*0.382) = 2074 kN.m For Inner girder, B.M.= (4935*1.1*0.294) =1596 kN.m Live Load Shear force in Girder For estimating the live load in the girders, the I.R.C. class AA loads are placed as Shown in the fig 6.11 Reaction of W2 on girder B = (350*0.45)/2.5 =63 kN Reaction of W2 on girder A=(350+63) =413 kN Total load on girder B =(350+63)= 413 kN Maximum reaction in girder B =(413*28.2)/30 =388 kN Maximum reaction on girder A = (287*28.2)/30 =270 kN Maximum live load shear with impact factor in inner girder = (388*1.1) =427 kN Our girder = (270 *1.1) =297 kN
  • 29. Design Bending Moments and shear forces Table - Abstract of design moments and shear Forces in main Girders Bendin g Moment D.L.B.M L.L.B.M TOTAL B.M. UNITS OUTER GIRDER INNER GIRDER 4261 4261 2074 1596 6335 5857 KN.m KN.m SHEAR FORCE D.L.S.F. L.L.S.F. TOTAL S.F. UNITS OUTER GIRDER INNER GIRDER 561 561 297 427 858 988 KN KN
  • 30. Properties Of Main Girder Section The main girder section is as shown in for computational purpose. The properties of the section are: A = 73 × 104 mm2 Y1 = 750 mm, Y b = 1050 mm, I = 2924×108 mm4 Z1 = (I / Y b ) = ( 2924 × 10 8 ) / 750 = 3.89×108 mm4 Z b = (I / Y b ) = ( 2924 × 108 ) / 1050 = 2.78×108 mm4 (i) Check for Minimum Section Modulus Fc k = 50 N/mm2 ɳ = 18 N/mm2 Fc t = 18 N/mm2 Mg =4261N/mm2 Fc i = 40 N/mm2 Mq = 2074kN.m Ft t = Ft w = 0 Md = (Mg + Mq) = 6335 KN.m Fcw = 16N/mm2 Fbr = (ɳfct – ftw) =n(.85 ×18 – 0) = 15.3 N/mm2 Ftr = (Fcw = ɳftt) = 16N/mm2 Finf = (ftw/ɳ) + (Md/ɳzb) = 0+ (6335 × 106)/(.85 ×2.78 ×108) = 26.80 N/mm2 Zb = Mq + (1- ɳ)Mg = (1.77×108 mm3< 2.78 ×108) Hence the section provided is adequate.
  • 31. Pre stressing Forces Allowing for two rows of cable, cover required =200 mm Maximum possible eccentricity e = (1050 – 200) = 850 mm Pre stressing force is obtained as P = (A.finf .Zb)/(Zb + A.e) = [(.73 × 106 ×26.80 ×2.78 ×108)/(2.78 ×108) +(.73 ×106V850)] = 6053 ×103 N = 6053 KN Using Freyssinet system, anchorage type 7K-15 (7strands of 15.2 mm diameter) in 65 mm Cables ducts, (IS: 6006-1983) Force in each cable = (7 ×.8 ×260.7) = 1459 KN Number of cables = (6053/1459) =5 Area of each strand = 140mm2 Area of 7 strands in each cable (7 ×140) = 980 mm2 Area of strands in 5 cable = Ap = (5 ×980) = 4900 mm2 The cables are arranged at centre of span sections
  • 32. Permissible Tendon Zone At support section, e ≤ (Zb.fct/P) – (Zb/A) ≤(2.78 ×108 ×18)/(6053 ×103) – (2.78 ×108)/(.73 ×106) ≤ 445 mm e ≥ (Zb.ftw/ɳP) – (Zb/A) ≥ 0 – (2.78 ×108)/(.73 ×106) ≥ -380 mm The 5 cables are arranged to follow a parabolic profile with the resultant force having an eccentricity of 180 mm towards the soffit at the support section. The position of cables at support section
  • 33. Check for Stresses For the centre of span section, we have P = 6053 KN e = 850 mm A = 0.73 ×106 mm2 Zb = 2.78 ×108 mm3 Zt = 3.89 ×108 mm3 H = 0.85 Mg = 4261 KN.m Mq = 2074 kN.m (P/A) = (6053 ×103)(.73 ×106) = 8.29 N/mm2 (Pe/zt) = (6053 ×103 ×850)/(3.89 ×108) = 13.22N/mm2 (Pe/Zb) = (6053 ×103 ×850)/(2.78 ×108) = 18.50 N/mm2 (Mg/Zt) = (4261 ×106) /(3.89 ×108) = 10.95 N/mm2 (Mg/Zb)= (4261 ×106) /(2.78 ×108) = 15.32 N/mm2 (Mq/Zt) = (2074 ×106) /(3.89 ×108) = 5.33 N/mm2 (Mq/Zb) = (2074 ×106) /(2.78 ×108) = 7.46 N/mm2
  • 34. At transfer stage : σt = [(P/A) - (Pe/zt) + (Mg/Zt) = (8.29 – 13.22 + 10.95) = 6.02 N/mm2 σb = [(P/A) +(Pe/Zb) -(Mg/Zb)] = (8.29 + 18.50 – 15.32] = 11.47 N/mm2 At working load stage: σt = [ɳ(P/A) - ɳ(Pe/zb) - (Mg/Zt)+ (Mg/Zt)] = [0.85 (8.29 – 13.22) + 10.95 + 5.33] = 12.09 N/mm2(compression) σb = [ɳ(P/A) - (Pe/Zb) - (Mg/Zb)+ (Mq/Zb)] = [0.85(8.29 + 18.50) – 15.32 – 7.46] = -0.01 N/mm2(Tension) All the stresses at top and bottom fibres at transfer and service loads are well within the safe permissible limits.