SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
Download to read offline
TORSIONAL SECTION PROPERTIES OF STEEL SHAPES
                                   Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, 2002




Contents                                                                                                                          Page


Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

St. Venant Torsional Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Warping Torsional Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Shear Centre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Monosymmetry Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

HSS Torsional Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

HSS Shear Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

A) Open Cross Sections:

       1. Doubly-Symmetric Wide-Flange Shapes (W-Shapes and I-Beams) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

       2. Channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

       3. Angles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

       4. T-Sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

       5. Monosymmetric Wide-Flange Shapes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

       6. Wide-Flange Shapes with Channel Cap                            . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

B) Closed Cross Sections:

       7. Hollow Structural Sections, Round . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

       8. Hollow Structural Sections, Square and Rectangular . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18



Revised Aug. 2002                                                 1                                                        CISC 2002
Introduction


Structural engineers occasionally need to determine the section properties of steel shapes not
found in the current edition of the Handbook of Steel Construction (CISC 2000). The following
pages provide the formulas for calculating the torsional section properties of structural steel
shapes.


The section properties considered are the St. Venant torsional constant, J, the warping
torsional constant, Cw, the shear centre location, yO , and the monosymmetry constant, βx .
Also included are the torsional constant, C, and the shear constant, CRT, for hollow structural
sections (HSS). Although not a torsional section property, the shear constant is included
because it is not easily found in the literature.


Some of the formulas given herein are less complex than those used in developing the
Handbook and the Structural Section Tables (CISC 1997). Effects such as flange-to-web fillet
radii, fillet welds, and sloped (tapered) flanges have not been taken into account. Likewise,
some of the formulas for monosymmetric shapes are approximations which are only valid
within a certain range of parameters. If needed, more accurate expressions can be found in
the references cited in the text.


Simple example calculations are provided for each type of cross section to illustrate the
formulas. A complete description of torsional theory or a detailed derivation of the formulas for
torsional section properties is beyond the scope of this discussion; only the final expressions
are given. The references can be consulted for further information.


Although no effort has been spared in an attempt to ensure that all data contained herein is
factual and that the numerical values are accurate to a degree consistent with current
structural design practice, the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction does not assume
responsibility for errors or oversights resulting from the use of the information contained
herein. Anyone making use of this information assumes all liability arising from such use. All
suggestions for improvement will receive full consideration.




                                                2                                     CISC 2002
St. Venant Torsional Constant
The St. Venant torsional constant, J, measures the resistance of a structural member to pure
or uniform torsion. It is used in calculating the buckling moment resistance of laterally
unsupported beams and torsional-flexural buckling of compression members in accordance
with CSA Standard S16.1-94 (CSA 1994).


For open cross sections, the general formula is given by Galambos (1968):
      b′ t 3       
J = ∑
      3            
                                                                                             [1]
                   


where b' are the plate lengths between points of intersection on their axes, and t are the plate
thicknesses. Summation includes all component plates. It is noted that the tabulated values in
the Handbook of Steel Construction (CISC 2000) are based on net plate lengths instead of
lengths between intersection points, a mostly conservative approach.


The expressions for J given herein do not take into account the flange-to-web fillets. Formulas
which account for this effect are given by El Darwish and Johnston (1965).


For thin-walled closed sections, the general formula is given by Salmon and Johnson (1980):
            2
         4 AO
J=                                                                                            [2]
     ∫   S
             ds t



where AO is the enclosed area by the walls, t is the wall thickness, ds is a length element
along the perimeter. Integration is performed over the entire perimeter S.




                                               3                                       CISC 2002
Warping Torsional Constant
The warping torsional constant, Cw, measures the resistance of a structural member to
nonuniform or warping torsion. It is used in calculating the buckling moment resistance of
laterally unsupported beams and torsional-flexural buckling of compression members in
accordance with CSA Standard S16.1-94 (CSA 1994).


For open sections, a general calculation method is given by Galambos (1968). For sections in
which all component plates meet at a single point, such as angles and T-sections, a
calculation method is given by Bleich (1952). For hollow structural sections (HSS), warping
deformations are small, and the warping torsional constant is generally taken as zero.



Shear Centre
The shear centre, or torsion centre, is the point in the plane of the cross section about which
twisting takes place. The shear centre location is required for calculating the warping torsional
constant and the monosymmetry constant. It is also required to determine the stabilizing or
destabilizing effect of gravity loading applied below or above the shear centre, respectively
(SSRC 1998). The coordinates of the shear centre location (xO, yO) are calculated with
respect to the centroid. A calculation method is given by Galambos (1968).




Monosymmetry Constant
The monosymmetry constant, βX, is used in calculating the buckling moment resistance of
laterally unsupported monosymmetric beams loaded in the plane of symmetry (CSA 2000). In
the case of a monosymmetric section that is symmetric about the vertical axis, the general
formula is given by SSRC (1998):

            ∫ y (x           )
        1
βX =                 2
                         + y 2 dA − 2 y O                                                       [3]
       IX    A




where IX is moment of inertia about the horizontal centroidal axis, dA is an area element and
yO is the vertical location of the shear centre with respect to the centroid. Integration is
performed over the entire cross section. The value of βX is zero for doubly-symmetric
sections.

                                                4                                        CISC 2002
HSS Torsional Constant
The torsional constant, C, is used for calculating the shear stress due to an applied torque. It
is expressed as the ratio of the applied torque, T, to the shear stress in the cross section, τ :

     T
C=                                                                                                [4]
     τ


HSS Shear Constant
The shear constant, CRT, is used for calculating the maximum shear stress due to an applied
shear force.


For hollow structural sections, the maximum shear stress in the cross section is given by:
          VQ
τ max =                                                                                       [5a]
          2t I


where V is the applied shear force, Q is the statical moment of the portion of the section lying
outside the neutral axis taken about the neutral axis, I is the moment of inertia, and t is the
wall thickness.


The shear constant is expressed as the ratio of the applied shear force to the maximum shear
stress (Stelco 1981):
           V          2t I
C RT =            =                                                                           [5b]
          τ max       Q




                                               5                                       CISC 2002
A) Open Cross Sections


1. Doubly-Symmetric Wide-Flange Shapes (W-Shapes and I-Beams)




                         Fig. 1a                                  Fig. 1b


Torsional section properties (flange-to-web fillets neglected):


   2 b t 3 + d ′w 3
J=                  (Galambos 1968)                                               [6]
           3



Cw =
       (d ′)2 b 3 t   (Galambos 1968, Picard and Beaulieu 1991)                   [7]
           24


d′ = d − t                                                                        [8]


Example calculation: W610x125
d = 612 mm, b = 229 mm, t = 19.6 mm, w = 11.9 mm
d' = 592 mm
J = 1480 x 103 mm4
Cw = 3440 x 109 mm6




                                                 6                          CISC 2002
2. Channels




                              Fig. 2a                      Fig. 2b

Torsional section properties (flange slope and flange-to-web fillets neglected):
     2 b′ t 3 + d ′ w 3
J=                         (SSRC 1998)                                                   [9]
              3

                 3 1 − 3 α   α2     d ′ w 
C w = (d ′) (b ′) t 
           2
                            +    1 +
                                              (Galambos 1968, SSRC 1998)             [10]
                     6        2     6 b ′ t 
                                              
        1
α=                                                                                      [11]
        d ′w
     2+
        3 b′ t

d′ = d − t ,     b′ = b − w 2                                                           [12]


Shear centre location:
                  w
xo = x + b′ α −           (Galambos 1968, Seaburg and Carter 1997)                      [13]
                  2


Example calculation: C310x31
d = 305 mm, b = 74 mm, t = 12.7 mm, w = 7.2 mm
(Actual flange slope = 1/6; zero slope assumed here for simplicity)
d' = 292 mm, b' = 70.4 mm
J = 132 x 103 mm4
α = 0.359, Cw = 29.0 x 109 mm6
x = 17.5 mm (formula not shown)
xO = 39.2 mm



                                                  7                                CISC 2002
3. Angles




                        Fig. 3a                             Fig. 3b

Torsional section properties (fillets neglected):



J=
     (d ′ + b ′)t 3                                                                     [14]
           3



Cw =
       t3
       36
           [            ]
          (d ′)3 + (b′)3 (Bleich 1952, Picard and Beaulieu 1991)                        [15]



           t                 t
d′ = d −     ,    b′ = b −                                                              [16]
           2                 2


The warping constant of angles is small and often neglected. For double angles, the values of
J and Cw can be taken equal to twice the value for single angles.


The shear centre (xO, yO) is located at the intersection of the angle leg axes.


Example calculation: L203x102x13
d = 203 mm, b = 102 mm, t = 12.7 mm
d' = 197 mm, b' = 95.7 mm
J = 200 x 103 mm4
Cw = 0.485 x 109 mm6



                                                8                                 CISC 2002
4. T-Sections




                      Fig. 4a                               Fig. 4b


Torsional section properties (flange-to-web fillets neglected):


     b t 3 + d ′w 3
J=                                                                                        [17]
            3


     b 3 t 3 (d ′) w 3
                  3

Cw =        +          (Bleich 1952, Picard and Beaulieu 1991)                            [18]
     144         36


           t
d′ = d −                                                                                  [19]
           2


The warping constant of T-sections is small and often neglected.


The shear centre is located at the intersection of the flange and stem plate axes.


Example calculation: WT180x67
d = 178 mm, b = 369 mm, t = 18.0 mm, w = 11.2 mm
d' = 169 mm
J = 796 x 103 mm4
Cw = 2.22 x 109 mm6




                                               9                                     CISC 2002
5. Monosymmetric Wide-Flange Shapes




                          Fig. 5a                             Fig. 5b


Torsional section properties (fillet welds neglected):
     b1 t 1 + b2 t 2 + d ′ w 3
          3        3
J=                             (SSRC 1998)                                                [20]
                3

       (d ′)2 b13 t 1 α
Cw =                      (SSRC 1998, Picard and Beaulieu 1991)                           [21]
             12
                 1
α=                                                                                        [22]
     1 + (b1 b2 ) (t 1 t 2 )
                     3



           (t 1 + t 2 )
d′ = d −                                                                                  [23]
               2
Subscripts "1" and "2" refer to the top and bottom flanges, respectively, as shown on Fig. 5b.


Shear centre location:
             t1
YO = YT −       − α d ′ (Galambos 1968)                                                   [24]
             2


The sign of YO calculated from Eq. 24 indicates whether the shear centre is located above
(YO > 0) or below (YO < 0) the centroid. The shear centre is generally located between the
centroid and the wider of the two flanges. For doubly-symmetric sections, YO is equal to zero
since the centroid and shear centre coincide.




                                                 10                                 CISC 2002
Monosymmetry constant:
                            I 2        Iy
β X ≈ δ 0.9 (2 ρ − 1) d ′ 1 −  y   ,
                                              ≤ 0.5 (Kitipornchai and Trahair 1980)        [25]
                            Ix  
                                    
                                           Ix

     I y TOP
ρ=             = 1− α                                                                        [26]
       Iy


Eq. 25 is an approximate formula and is only valid if IY ≤ 0.5 IX, where IY and IX are the
moments of inertia of the section about the vertical and horizontal centroidal axes,
respectively. A more accurate expression is given by SSRC (1998).


The value of δ depends on which flange is in compression:


     + 1 If the top flange is in compression
δ =                                                                                         [27]
     − 1 If the bottom flange is in compression


Generally, the value of βX obtained from Eq. 25 will be positive when the wider flange is in
compression and negative when in tension.


Example calculation: WRF1200x244 The top flange is in compression.
d = 1200 mm, b1 = 300 mm, b2 = 550 mm, t1 = t2 = 20.0 mm, w = 12.0 mm
d' = 1180 mm
α = 0.860, ρ = 1 - α = 0.140
J = 2950 x 103 mm4
Cw = 53 900 x 109 mm6
YT = 695 mm (formula not shown)
YO = -330 mm
Since YO is negative, the shear centre is located between the centroid and the bottom flange.
IX = 7240 x 106 mm4, IY = 322 x 106 mm4 (formulas not shown)
IY / IX = 0.0445 < 0.5 OK
δ = +1
βX = -763 mm (The top flange is narrower and in compression.)


                                                      11                                CISC 2002
6. Wide-Flange Shapes with Channel Cap




                              Fig. 6a                             Fig. 6b



Torsional section properties (flange-to-web fillets neglected):


A conservative estimate of the St. Venant torsional constant is given by:
J ≈ JW + JC                                                                                    [28]


The "w" and "c" subscripts refer to the W-shape and channel, respectively. A more refined
expression for J is proposed by Ellifritt and Lue (1998).


Shear centre location:
             tW + w C
YO = YT −             − a + e (Kitipornchai and Trahair 1980)                                  [29]
                2
a = (1 − ρ ) h , b = ρ h                                                                       [30]

          I y TOP            I y TOP
ρ=                       =                                                                     [31]
     I y TOP + I y BOT         Iy


where Iy TOP, Iy BOT, and Iy are the moments of inertia of the built-up top flange (channel + top
flange of the W-shape), the bottom flange, and the entire built-up section about the vertical
axis, respectively. With the channel cap on the top flange, as shown on Fig. 6, the value of YO
obtained from Eq. 29 will be positive, indicating that the shear centre is located above the
centroid.

                                               12                                      CISC 2002
The distance between the shear centres of the top and bottom flanges is given by:
                  wC
h = dW − tW +        +e                                                                         [32]
                   2


The distance between the shear centre of the built-up top flange and the centre line of the
channel web and W-shape top flange, taken together as a single plate, is given by:
      2   2
     bC d C t C
e=                                                                                              [33]
      4 ρ Iy


Warping constant of the built-up section:
Cw = a 2 I y TOP + b 2 I y BOT (Kitipornchai and Trahair 1980)                                  [34]


A simplified formula for Cw is also given by Ellifritt and Lue (1998).


Monosymmetry constant:
                          I 2       b       Iy
β X ≈ δ 0.9 (2 ρ − 1) h 1 −  y   1 + C  ,
                             I   2d                ≤ 0.5 (Kitipornchai and Trahair 1980)    [35]
                          x                 Ix
                                  


where d is the built-up section depth:
d = dW + w C                                                                                    [36]


Eq. 35 is an approximation which is only valid if IY ≤ 0.5 IX, where Ix is the moment of inertia
of the built-up section about the horizontal centroidal axis. See page 11 for the value of δ and
the sign of βX . A further simplified expression is given by Ellifritt and Lue (1998).




                                                   13                                      CISC 2002
Example calculation: W610x125 and C310x31


W-shape: W610x125
dW = 612 mm, bW = 229 mm, tW = 19.6 mm, wW = 11.9 mm
JW = 1480 x 103 mm4 (previously calculated, p. 6)


Channel cap: C310x31
dC = 305 mm, bC = 74 mm, tC = 12.7 mm, wC = 7.2 mm
JC = 132 x 103 mm4 (previously calculated, p. 7)


Built-up section, with the top flange in compression:
J = 1610 x 103 mm4
YT = 255 mm (formula not shown)
Iy TOP = 73.1 x 106 mm4 (formula not shown)
Iy BOT = 19.6 x 106 mm4 (formula not shown)
Iy = 92.7 x 106 mm4
ρ = 0.789
e = 22.1 mm
h = 618 mm
a = 130 mm
b = 488 mm
YO = 134 mm
Since the calculated value of YO is positive, the shear centre is located above the centroid
(see Fig. 6b).
CW = 5900 x 109 mm6
Ix = 1260 x 106 mm4 (formula not shown)
d = 619 mm
Iy / Ix =0.0736 < 0.5 OK
δ = +1 (top flange in compression)
βX = 339 mm (wider top flange in compression)




                                              14                                     CISC 2002
B) Closed Cross Sections


7. Hollow Structural Sections (HSS), Round




                                                               Fig. 7


St. Venant torsional constant (valid for any wall thickness):

J = 2I =
               π
              32
                 [d    4
                           − (d − 2 t )
                                              4
                                                  ] (Stelco 1981, Seaburg and Carter 1997)        [37]



where d is the outer diameter, I is the moment of inertia, and t is the wall thickness. The
warping constant Cw is taken equal to zero.


HSS torsional constant (valid for any wall thickness):
     2J
C=      (Stelco 1981, Seaburg and Carter 1997)                                                   [38a]
     d
HSS shear constant:
             2t I
C RT =            (Stelco 1981)                                                                  [38b]
             Q

I=
     π
     64
        [d     4
                   − (d − 2 t )
                                  4
                                      ]                                                           [39]


Q=
     t
     6
         (
       3d 2 − 6d t + 4t 2                 )   (Stelco 1981)                                       [40]



Example calculation: HSS324x9.5
d = 324 mm, t = 9.53 mm
J = 233 000 x 103 mm4, I = 116 x 106 mm4 , Q = 471 x 103 mm3
C = 1440 x 103 mm3, CRT = 4710 mm2


                                                                   15                        CISC 2002
8. Hollow Structural Sections (HSS), Square and Rectangular




                                               Fig. 8

St. Venant torsional constant (valid for thin-walled sections, b / t ≥ 10):
        2
     4 AP t
J≈            (Salmon and Johnson 1980)                                                     [41]
       p


Mid-contour length:
p = 2 [(d − t ) + (b − t )] − 2 RC (4 − π )                                                 [42]


Enclosed area:
AP = (d − t )(b − t ) − RC (4 − π )
                         2
                                                                                            [43]


Mean corner radius:
       RO + R i
RC =            ≈ 1 .5 t                                                                    [44]
          2


where d and b are the longer and shorter outside dimensions, respectively, and t is the wall
thickness. RO and Ri are the outer and inner corner radii taken equal to 2t and t, respectively.


The warping constant Cw is usually taken equal to zero.




                                               16                                     CISC 2002
HSS torsional constant (valid for thin-walled sections, b / t ≥ 10):
C ≈ 2 t Ap   (Salmon and Johnson 1980, Seaburg and Carter 1997)                               [45a]


HSS shear constant (approximate):
C RT ≈ 2 t (h − 4 t ) (Stelco 1981)                                                           [45b]


where h is the outer section dimension in the direction of the applied shear force. A more
accurate expression is also given by Stelco (1981).


Example calculation: HSS203x102x6.4
d = 203 mm, b = 102 mm, t = 6.35 mm
RO = 12.7 mm
Ri = 6.35 mm
RC = 9.53 mm
p = 568 mm
Ap = 18 700 mm2
J = 15 600 x 103 mm4
It is assumed that the shear force acts in a direction parallel to the longer dimension, d.
h = d = 203 mm
C = 238 x 103 mm3
CRT = 2260 mm2




                                               17                                      CISC 2002
References


Bleich, F. 1952. Buckling Strength of Metal Structures, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, N.Y.


CISC. 1997. Structural Section Tables (SST Electronic Database), Canadian Institute of Steel
     Construction, Willowdale, Ont.


CISC. 2000. Handbook of Steel Construction, 7th Edition, 2nd Revised Printing. Canadian
     Institute of Steel Construction, Willowdale, Ont.


CSA. 1994. Limit States Design of Steel Structures. CSA Standard S16.1-94. Canadian
     Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont.


CSA. 2000. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CSA Standard S6-00. Canadian
     Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont.


El Darwish, I.A. and Johnston, B.G. 1965. Torsion of Structural Shapes. ASCE Journal of the
     Structural Division, Vol. 91, ST1.
     Errata: ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 92, ST1, Feb. 1966, p. 471.


Ellifritt, D.S. and Lue, D.-M. 1998. Design of Crane Runway Beam with Channel Cap.
     Engineering Journal, AISC, 2nd Quarter.


Galambos, T.V. 1968. Structural Members and Frames. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs,
     N.J.


Kitipornchai, S. and Trahair, N.S. 1980. Buckling Properties of Monosymmetric I-Beams.
     ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 106, ST5.


Picard, A. and Beaulieu, D. 1991. Calcul des charpentes d'acier. Canadian Institute of Steel
     Construction, Willowdale, Ont.




                                              18                                   CISC 2002
Salmon, C.G. and Johnson, J.E. 1980. Steel Structures, Design and Behavior, 2nd Edition.
     Harper & Row, Publishers. New York, N.Y.


Seaburg, P.A. and Carter, C.J. 1997. Torsional Analysis of Structural Steel Members.
     American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill.


SSRC. 1998. Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, 5th Edition. Edited by
     T.V. Galambos, Structural Stability Research Council, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
     N.Y.


Stelco. 1981. Hollow Structural Sections - Sizes and Section Properties, 6th Edition. Stelco
     Inc., Hamilton, Ont.




                                              19                                     CISC 2002

More Related Content

What's hot

Marshal mix design
Marshal mix designMarshal mix design
Marshal mix design
Prionath Roy
 
Lesson 04, shearing force and bending moment 01
Lesson 04, shearing force and bending moment 01Lesson 04, shearing force and bending moment 01
Lesson 04, shearing force and bending moment 01
Msheer Bargaray
 
57985193 concrete-silo-design
57985193 concrete-silo-design57985193 concrete-silo-design
57985193 concrete-silo-design
141jdf
 

What's hot (20)

Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)
Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)
Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)
 
Slope Stability by GeoMads
Slope Stability by GeoMadsSlope Stability by GeoMads
Slope Stability by GeoMads
 
Marshal mix design
Marshal mix designMarshal mix design
Marshal mix design
 
Unit 3--analysis of stresses in two dimensions
Unit  3--analysis of stresses in two dimensionsUnit  3--analysis of stresses in two dimensions
Unit 3--analysis of stresses in two dimensions
 
Geo Technical Engineering (computing lateral earth pressure)
Geo Technical Engineering (computing lateral earth pressure)Geo Technical Engineering (computing lateral earth pressure)
Geo Technical Engineering (computing lateral earth pressure)
 
Introduction to Torsion
Introduction to TorsionIntroduction to Torsion
Introduction to Torsion
 
Ansys beam problem
Ansys beam problemAnsys beam problem
Ansys beam problem
 
Mathcad 17-slab design
Mathcad   17-slab designMathcad   17-slab design
Mathcad 17-slab design
 
Sd i-module3- rajesh sir
Sd i-module3- rajesh sirSd i-module3- rajesh sir
Sd i-module3- rajesh sir
 
The Finite Element Analysis for Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction with ABAQU...
The Finite Element Analysis for Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction with ABAQU...The Finite Element Analysis for Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction with ABAQU...
The Finite Element Analysis for Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction with ABAQU...
 
Prof.N.B.HUI Lecture of solid mechanics
Prof.N.B.HUI Lecture of solid mechanicsProf.N.B.HUI Lecture of solid mechanics
Prof.N.B.HUI Lecture of solid mechanics
 
Solubility of bituminous materials
Solubility of bituminous materialsSolubility of bituminous materials
Solubility of bituminous materials
 
Question and Answers on Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory (usefulsearch.org)...
Question and Answers on Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory (usefulsearch.org)...Question and Answers on Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory (usefulsearch.org)...
Question and Answers on Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory (usefulsearch.org)...
 
Lesson 04, shearing force and bending moment 01
Lesson 04, shearing force and bending moment 01Lesson 04, shearing force and bending moment 01
Lesson 04, shearing force and bending moment 01
 
Timoshenko beam-element
Timoshenko beam-elementTimoshenko beam-element
Timoshenko beam-element
 
crack control and crack width estimation
crack control and crack width estimationcrack control and crack width estimation
crack control and crack width estimation
 
Stiffness matrix method for beam , examples ce525
Stiffness  matrix method for beam , examples   ce525Stiffness  matrix method for beam , examples   ce525
Stiffness matrix method for beam , examples ce525
 
57985193 concrete-silo-design
57985193 concrete-silo-design57985193 concrete-silo-design
57985193 concrete-silo-design
 
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSES
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSESFLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSES
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSES
 
Fluid mechanics notes statics
Fluid mechanics notes    staticsFluid mechanics notes    statics
Fluid mechanics notes statics
 

Viewers also liked

16. plane frame analysis using the stiffness method
16. plane frame analysis using the stiffness method16. plane frame analysis using the stiffness method
16. plane frame analysis using the stiffness method
Chhay Teng
 
Advance section properties_for_students
Advance section properties_for_studentsAdvance section properties_for_students
Advance section properties_for_students
Chhay Teng
 
15. beam analysis using the stiffness method
15. beam analysis using the stiffness method15. beam analysis using the stiffness method
15. beam analysis using the stiffness method
Chhay Teng
 
Painting and formwork
Painting and formworkPainting and formwork
Painting and formwork
Chhay Teng
 
Technical standard specification auto content
Technical standard specification auto contentTechnical standard specification auto content
Technical standard specification auto content
Chhay Teng
 
Available steel-section-list-in-cam
Available steel-section-list-in-camAvailable steel-section-list-in-cam
Available steel-section-list-in-cam
Chhay Teng
 
Construction general
Construction generalConstruction general
Construction general
Chhay Teng
 
11. displacement method of analysis slope deflection equations
11. displacement method of analysis  slope deflection equations11. displacement method of analysis  slope deflection equations
11. displacement method of analysis slope deflection equations
Chhay Teng
 
A.matrix algebra for structural analysisdoc
A.matrix algebra for structural analysisdocA.matrix algebra for structural analysisdoc
A.matrix algebra for structural analysisdoc
Chhay Teng
 
Representative flower of asian countries
Representative flower of asian countriesRepresentative flower of asian countries
Representative flower of asian countries
Chhay Teng
 
វិធីសាស្រ្តក្នុងការគណនារកចំនួនអំពូលក្នុងបន្ទប់
វិធីសាស្រ្តក្នុងការគណនារកចំនួនអំពូលក្នុងបន្ទប់វិធីសាស្រ្តក្នុងការគណនារកចំនួនអំពូលក្នុងបន្ទប់
វិធីសាស្រ្តក្នុងការគណនារកចំនួនអំពូលក្នុងបន្ទប់
National Polytechnic institute of Cambodia
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Type of road
Type of roadType of road
Type of road
 
16. plane frame analysis using the stiffness method
16. plane frame analysis using the stiffness method16. plane frame analysis using the stiffness method
16. plane frame analysis using the stiffness method
 
Advance section properties_for_students
Advance section properties_for_studentsAdvance section properties_for_students
Advance section properties_for_students
 
15. beam analysis using the stiffness method
15. beam analysis using the stiffness method15. beam analysis using the stiffness method
15. beam analysis using the stiffness method
 
Brick
BrickBrick
Brick
 
Painting and formwork
Painting and formworkPainting and formwork
Painting and formwork
 
Technical standard specification auto content
Technical standard specification auto contentTechnical standard specification auto content
Technical standard specification auto content
 
Japan hj
Japan hjJapan hj
Japan hj
 
Available steel-section-list-in-cam
Available steel-section-list-in-camAvailable steel-section-list-in-cam
Available steel-section-list-in-cam
 
Construction general
Construction generalConstruction general
Construction general
 
11. displacement method of analysis slope deflection equations
11. displacement method of analysis  slope deflection equations11. displacement method of analysis  slope deflection equations
11. displacement method of analysis slope deflection equations
 
A.matrix algebra for structural analysisdoc
A.matrix algebra for structural analysisdocA.matrix algebra for structural analysisdoc
A.matrix algebra for structural analysisdoc
 
Representative flower of asian countries
Representative flower of asian countriesRepresentative flower of asian countries
Representative flower of asian countries
 
Euro sfb
Euro sfbEuro sfb
Euro sfb
 
Euro u
Euro uEuro u
Euro u
 
វិធីសាស្រ្តក្នុងការគណនារកចំនួនអំពូលក្នុងបន្ទប់
វិធីសាស្រ្តក្នុងការគណនារកចំនួនអំពូលក្នុងបន្ទប់វិធីសាស្រ្តក្នុងការគណនារកចំនួនអំពូលក្នុងបន្ទប់
វិធីសាស្រ្តក្នុងការគណនារកចំនួនអំពូលក្នុងបន្ទប់
 
Mix design
Mix designMix design
Mix design
 
Cpac
CpacCpac
Cpac
 
វិធីតម្លើងប៉ូលីកាបូណាត
វិធីតម្លើងប៉ូលីកាបូណាតវិធីតម្លើងប៉ូលីកាបូណាត
វិធីតម្លើងប៉ូលីកាបូណាត
 
Plastering
PlasteringPlastering
Plastering
 

Similar to Torsionprop

Similar to Torsionprop (20)

Aisc torsion guide
Aisc torsion guideAisc torsion guide
Aisc torsion guide
 
Engineering science lesson 6 2
Engineering science lesson 6 2Engineering science lesson 6 2
Engineering science lesson 6 2
 
Torsion
TorsionTorsion
Torsion
 
CHAPTER 1.ppt
CHAPTER 1.pptCHAPTER 1.ppt
CHAPTER 1.ppt
 
torsion
torsiontorsion
torsion
 
Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf
Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdfDiv_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf
Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf
 
Reinforced concrete II Hand out Chapter 5_PPT_Torsion.pdf
Reinforced concrete II Hand out Chapter 5_PPT_Torsion.pdfReinforced concrete II Hand out Chapter 5_PPT_Torsion.pdf
Reinforced concrete II Hand out Chapter 5_PPT_Torsion.pdf
 
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptxConceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
 
Torsion in beam
Torsion in beamTorsion in beam
Torsion in beam
 
3_torsion [Read-Only] [Compatibility Mode].pdf
3_torsion [Read-Only] [Compatibility Mode].pdf3_torsion [Read-Only] [Compatibility Mode].pdf
3_torsion [Read-Only] [Compatibility Mode].pdf
 
Blodgett lincoln-solutions-to-design-of-weldments
Blodgett lincoln-solutions-to-design-of-weldmentsBlodgett lincoln-solutions-to-design-of-weldments
Blodgett lincoln-solutions-to-design-of-weldments
 
Torsional and bending stresses in machine parts
Torsional and bending stresses in machine partsTorsional and bending stresses in machine parts
Torsional and bending stresses in machine parts
 
Theory of Plates and Shells
Theory of Plates and ShellsTheory of Plates and Shells
Theory of Plates and Shells
 
3 torsion
3 torsion3 torsion
3 torsion
 
Pushkar singh new steel structure
Pushkar singh new steel structurePushkar singh new steel structure
Pushkar singh new steel structure
 
Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams
Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete BeamsAnalysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams
Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams
 
IRJET - An Investigation of Stresses Induced in Curved Beams using MATLAB...
IRJET -  	  An Investigation of Stresses Induced in Curved Beams using MATLAB...IRJET -  	  An Investigation of Stresses Induced in Curved Beams using MATLAB...
IRJET - An Investigation of Stresses Induced in Curved Beams using MATLAB...
 
Boardman
BoardmanBoardman
Boardman
 
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
 International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)  International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
 
VIGAS CONJUGADAS - RESISTENCIA DE LOS MATERIALES
VIGAS CONJUGADAS - RESISTENCIA DE LOS MATERIALES VIGAS CONJUGADAS - RESISTENCIA DE LOS MATERIALES
VIGAS CONJUGADAS - RESISTENCIA DE LOS MATERIALES
 

More from Chhay Teng

Composition of mix design
Composition of mix designComposition of mix design
Composition of mix design
Chhay Teng
 
2009 ncdd-csf-technical-manual-vol-i-study-design-guidelines
2009 ncdd-csf-technical-manual-vol-i-study-design-guidelines2009 ncdd-csf-technical-manual-vol-i-study-design-guidelines
2009 ncdd-csf-technical-manual-vol-i-study-design-guidelines
Chhay Teng
 
Concrete basics
Concrete basicsConcrete basics
Concrete basics
Chhay Teng
 
Rebar arrangement and construction carryout
Rebar arrangement and construction carryoutRebar arrangement and construction carryout
Rebar arrangement and construction carryout
Chhay Teng
 
1 dimension and properties table of w shapes
1 dimension and properties table of w shapes1 dimension and properties table of w shapes
1 dimension and properties table of w shapes
Chhay Teng
 
2 dimension and properties table of s shape
2 dimension and properties table of s shape2 dimension and properties table of s shape
2 dimension and properties table of s shape
Chhay Teng
 
3 dimension and properties table of hp shape
3 dimension and properties table of hp shape3 dimension and properties table of hp shape
3 dimension and properties table of hp shape
Chhay Teng
 
4 dimension and properties table c shape
4 dimension and properties table c shape4 dimension and properties table c shape
4 dimension and properties table c shape
Chhay Teng
 
5 dimension and properties table l shape
5 dimension and properties table l shape5 dimension and properties table l shape
5 dimension and properties table l shape
Chhay Teng
 
6 dimension and properties table of ipe shape
6 dimension and properties table of ipe shape6 dimension and properties table of ipe shape
6 dimension and properties table of ipe shape
Chhay Teng
 
7 dimension and properties table ipn
7 dimension and properties table ipn7 dimension and properties table ipn
7 dimension and properties table ipn
Chhay Teng
 
8 dimension and properties table of equal leg angle
8 dimension and properties table of equal leg angle8 dimension and properties table of equal leg angle
8 dimension and properties table of equal leg angle
Chhay Teng
 
9 dimension and properties table of upe
9 dimension and properties table of upe9 dimension and properties table of upe
9 dimension and properties table of upe
Chhay Teng
 
10 dimension and properties table upn
10 dimension and properties table upn10 dimension and properties table upn
10 dimension and properties table upn
Chhay Teng
 
11 dimension and properties table of u
11 dimension and properties table of u11 dimension and properties table of u
11 dimension and properties table of u
Chhay Teng
 
Construction permit (kh)
Construction permit (kh)Construction permit (kh)
Construction permit (kh)
Chhay Teng
 
Concrete price and proportion
Concrete price and proportionConcrete price and proportion
Concrete price and proportion
Chhay Teng
 
Roof preparation
Roof preparationRoof preparation
Roof preparation
Chhay Teng
 
Cement knowledge revised 160110
Cement knowledge revised 160110Cement knowledge revised 160110
Cement knowledge revised 160110
Chhay Teng
 
standard materials price list 2011 (PP)
standard materials price list 2011 (PP)standard materials price list 2011 (PP)
standard materials price list 2011 (PP)
Chhay Teng
 

More from Chhay Teng (20)

Composition of mix design
Composition of mix designComposition of mix design
Composition of mix design
 
2009 ncdd-csf-technical-manual-vol-i-study-design-guidelines
2009 ncdd-csf-technical-manual-vol-i-study-design-guidelines2009 ncdd-csf-technical-manual-vol-i-study-design-guidelines
2009 ncdd-csf-technical-manual-vol-i-study-design-guidelines
 
Concrete basics
Concrete basicsConcrete basics
Concrete basics
 
Rebar arrangement and construction carryout
Rebar arrangement and construction carryoutRebar arrangement and construction carryout
Rebar arrangement and construction carryout
 
1 dimension and properties table of w shapes
1 dimension and properties table of w shapes1 dimension and properties table of w shapes
1 dimension and properties table of w shapes
 
2 dimension and properties table of s shape
2 dimension and properties table of s shape2 dimension and properties table of s shape
2 dimension and properties table of s shape
 
3 dimension and properties table of hp shape
3 dimension and properties table of hp shape3 dimension and properties table of hp shape
3 dimension and properties table of hp shape
 
4 dimension and properties table c shape
4 dimension and properties table c shape4 dimension and properties table c shape
4 dimension and properties table c shape
 
5 dimension and properties table l shape
5 dimension and properties table l shape5 dimension and properties table l shape
5 dimension and properties table l shape
 
6 dimension and properties table of ipe shape
6 dimension and properties table of ipe shape6 dimension and properties table of ipe shape
6 dimension and properties table of ipe shape
 
7 dimension and properties table ipn
7 dimension and properties table ipn7 dimension and properties table ipn
7 dimension and properties table ipn
 
8 dimension and properties table of equal leg angle
8 dimension and properties table of equal leg angle8 dimension and properties table of equal leg angle
8 dimension and properties table of equal leg angle
 
9 dimension and properties table of upe
9 dimension and properties table of upe9 dimension and properties table of upe
9 dimension and properties table of upe
 
10 dimension and properties table upn
10 dimension and properties table upn10 dimension and properties table upn
10 dimension and properties table upn
 
11 dimension and properties table of u
11 dimension and properties table of u11 dimension and properties table of u
11 dimension and properties table of u
 
Construction permit (kh)
Construction permit (kh)Construction permit (kh)
Construction permit (kh)
 
Concrete price and proportion
Concrete price and proportionConcrete price and proportion
Concrete price and proportion
 
Roof preparation
Roof preparationRoof preparation
Roof preparation
 
Cement knowledge revised 160110
Cement knowledge revised 160110Cement knowledge revised 160110
Cement knowledge revised 160110
 
standard materials price list 2011 (PP)
standard materials price list 2011 (PP)standard materials price list 2011 (PP)
standard materials price list 2011 (PP)
 

Recently uploaded

TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc
 

Recently uploaded (20)

ERP Contender Series: Acumatica vs. Sage Intacct
ERP Contender Series: Acumatica vs. Sage IntacctERP Contender Series: Acumatica vs. Sage Intacct
ERP Contender Series: Acumatica vs. Sage Intacct
 
Intro in Product Management - Коротко про професію продакт менеджера
Intro in Product Management - Коротко про професію продакт менеджераIntro in Product Management - Коротко про професію продакт менеджера
Intro in Product Management - Коротко про професію продакт менеджера
 
Overview of Hyperledger Foundation
Overview of Hyperledger FoundationOverview of Hyperledger Foundation
Overview of Hyperledger Foundation
 
The Value of Certifying Products for FDO _ Paul at FIDO Alliance.pdf
The Value of Certifying Products for FDO _ Paul at FIDO Alliance.pdfThe Value of Certifying Products for FDO _ Paul at FIDO Alliance.pdf
The Value of Certifying Products for FDO _ Paul at FIDO Alliance.pdf
 
AI mind or machine power point presentation
AI mind or machine power point presentationAI mind or machine power point presentation
AI mind or machine power point presentation
 
Secure Zero Touch enabled Edge compute with Dell NativeEdge via FDO _ Brad at...
Secure Zero Touch enabled Edge compute with Dell NativeEdge via FDO _ Brad at...Secure Zero Touch enabled Edge compute with Dell NativeEdge via FDO _ Brad at...
Secure Zero Touch enabled Edge compute with Dell NativeEdge via FDO _ Brad at...
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
 
Linux Foundation Edge _ Overview of FDO Software Components _ Randy at Intel.pdf
Linux Foundation Edge _ Overview of FDO Software Components _ Randy at Intel.pdfLinux Foundation Edge _ Overview of FDO Software Components _ Randy at Intel.pdf
Linux Foundation Edge _ Overview of FDO Software Components _ Randy at Intel.pdf
 
State of the Smart Building Startup Landscape 2024!
State of the Smart Building Startup Landscape 2024!State of the Smart Building Startup Landscape 2024!
State of the Smart Building Startup Landscape 2024!
 
Human Expert Website Manual WCAG 2.0 2.1 2.2 Audit - Digital Accessibility Au...
Human Expert Website Manual WCAG 2.0 2.1 2.2 Audit - Digital Accessibility Au...Human Expert Website Manual WCAG 2.0 2.1 2.2 Audit - Digital Accessibility Au...
Human Expert Website Manual WCAG 2.0 2.1 2.2 Audit - Digital Accessibility Au...
 
Intro to Passkeys and the State of Passwordless.pptx
Intro to Passkeys and the State of Passwordless.pptxIntro to Passkeys and the State of Passwordless.pptx
Intro to Passkeys and the State of Passwordless.pptx
 
Google I/O Extended 2024 Warsaw
Google I/O Extended 2024 WarsawGoogle I/O Extended 2024 Warsaw
Google I/O Extended 2024 Warsaw
 
Working together SRE & Platform Engineering
Working together SRE & Platform EngineeringWorking together SRE & Platform Engineering
Working together SRE & Platform Engineering
 
Event-Driven Architecture Masterclass: Integrating Distributed Data Stores Ac...
Event-Driven Architecture Masterclass: Integrating Distributed Data Stores Ac...Event-Driven Architecture Masterclass: Integrating Distributed Data Stores Ac...
Event-Driven Architecture Masterclass: Integrating Distributed Data Stores Ac...
 
How we scaled to 80K users by doing nothing!.pdf
How we scaled to 80K users by doing nothing!.pdfHow we scaled to 80K users by doing nothing!.pdf
How we scaled to 80K users by doing nothing!.pdf
 
Design Guidelines for Passkeys 2024.pptx
Design Guidelines for Passkeys 2024.pptxDesign Guidelines for Passkeys 2024.pptx
Design Guidelines for Passkeys 2024.pptx
 
Where to Learn More About FDO _ Richard at FIDO Alliance.pdf
Where to Learn More About FDO _ Richard at FIDO Alliance.pdfWhere to Learn More About FDO _ Richard at FIDO Alliance.pdf
Where to Learn More About FDO _ Richard at FIDO Alliance.pdf
 
2024 May Patch Tuesday
2024 May Patch Tuesday2024 May Patch Tuesday
2024 May Patch Tuesday
 
Extensible Python: Robustness through Addition - PyCon 2024
Extensible Python: Robustness through Addition - PyCon 2024Extensible Python: Robustness through Addition - PyCon 2024
Extensible Python: Robustness through Addition - PyCon 2024
 
TopCryptoSupers 12thReport OrionX May2024
TopCryptoSupers 12thReport OrionX May2024TopCryptoSupers 12thReport OrionX May2024
TopCryptoSupers 12thReport OrionX May2024
 

Torsionprop

  • 1. TORSIONAL SECTION PROPERTIES OF STEEL SHAPES Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, 2002 Contents Page Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 St. Venant Torsional Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Warping Torsional Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Shear Centre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Monosymmetry Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 HSS Torsional Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 HSS Shear Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 A) Open Cross Sections: 1. Doubly-Symmetric Wide-Flange Shapes (W-Shapes and I-Beams) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2. Channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3. Angles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4. T-Sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. Monosymmetric Wide-Flange Shapes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 6. Wide-Flange Shapes with Channel Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 B) Closed Cross Sections: 7. Hollow Structural Sections, Round . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8. Hollow Structural Sections, Square and Rectangular . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Revised Aug. 2002 1 CISC 2002
  • 2. Introduction Structural engineers occasionally need to determine the section properties of steel shapes not found in the current edition of the Handbook of Steel Construction (CISC 2000). The following pages provide the formulas for calculating the torsional section properties of structural steel shapes. The section properties considered are the St. Venant torsional constant, J, the warping torsional constant, Cw, the shear centre location, yO , and the monosymmetry constant, βx . Also included are the torsional constant, C, and the shear constant, CRT, for hollow structural sections (HSS). Although not a torsional section property, the shear constant is included because it is not easily found in the literature. Some of the formulas given herein are less complex than those used in developing the Handbook and the Structural Section Tables (CISC 1997). Effects such as flange-to-web fillet radii, fillet welds, and sloped (tapered) flanges have not been taken into account. Likewise, some of the formulas for monosymmetric shapes are approximations which are only valid within a certain range of parameters. If needed, more accurate expressions can be found in the references cited in the text. Simple example calculations are provided for each type of cross section to illustrate the formulas. A complete description of torsional theory or a detailed derivation of the formulas for torsional section properties is beyond the scope of this discussion; only the final expressions are given. The references can be consulted for further information. Although no effort has been spared in an attempt to ensure that all data contained herein is factual and that the numerical values are accurate to a degree consistent with current structural design practice, the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction does not assume responsibility for errors or oversights resulting from the use of the information contained herein. Anyone making use of this information assumes all liability arising from such use. All suggestions for improvement will receive full consideration. 2 CISC 2002
  • 3. St. Venant Torsional Constant The St. Venant torsional constant, J, measures the resistance of a structural member to pure or uniform torsion. It is used in calculating the buckling moment resistance of laterally unsupported beams and torsional-flexural buckling of compression members in accordance with CSA Standard S16.1-94 (CSA 1994). For open cross sections, the general formula is given by Galambos (1968):  b′ t 3  J = ∑  3   [1]   where b' are the plate lengths between points of intersection on their axes, and t are the plate thicknesses. Summation includes all component plates. It is noted that the tabulated values in the Handbook of Steel Construction (CISC 2000) are based on net plate lengths instead of lengths between intersection points, a mostly conservative approach. The expressions for J given herein do not take into account the flange-to-web fillets. Formulas which account for this effect are given by El Darwish and Johnston (1965). For thin-walled closed sections, the general formula is given by Salmon and Johnson (1980): 2 4 AO J= [2] ∫ S ds t where AO is the enclosed area by the walls, t is the wall thickness, ds is a length element along the perimeter. Integration is performed over the entire perimeter S. 3 CISC 2002
  • 4. Warping Torsional Constant The warping torsional constant, Cw, measures the resistance of a structural member to nonuniform or warping torsion. It is used in calculating the buckling moment resistance of laterally unsupported beams and torsional-flexural buckling of compression members in accordance with CSA Standard S16.1-94 (CSA 1994). For open sections, a general calculation method is given by Galambos (1968). For sections in which all component plates meet at a single point, such as angles and T-sections, a calculation method is given by Bleich (1952). For hollow structural sections (HSS), warping deformations are small, and the warping torsional constant is generally taken as zero. Shear Centre The shear centre, or torsion centre, is the point in the plane of the cross section about which twisting takes place. The shear centre location is required for calculating the warping torsional constant and the monosymmetry constant. It is also required to determine the stabilizing or destabilizing effect of gravity loading applied below or above the shear centre, respectively (SSRC 1998). The coordinates of the shear centre location (xO, yO) are calculated with respect to the centroid. A calculation method is given by Galambos (1968). Monosymmetry Constant The monosymmetry constant, βX, is used in calculating the buckling moment resistance of laterally unsupported monosymmetric beams loaded in the plane of symmetry (CSA 2000). In the case of a monosymmetric section that is symmetric about the vertical axis, the general formula is given by SSRC (1998): ∫ y (x ) 1 βX = 2 + y 2 dA − 2 y O [3] IX A where IX is moment of inertia about the horizontal centroidal axis, dA is an area element and yO is the vertical location of the shear centre with respect to the centroid. Integration is performed over the entire cross section. The value of βX is zero for doubly-symmetric sections. 4 CISC 2002
  • 5. HSS Torsional Constant The torsional constant, C, is used for calculating the shear stress due to an applied torque. It is expressed as the ratio of the applied torque, T, to the shear stress in the cross section, τ : T C= [4] τ HSS Shear Constant The shear constant, CRT, is used for calculating the maximum shear stress due to an applied shear force. For hollow structural sections, the maximum shear stress in the cross section is given by: VQ τ max = [5a] 2t I where V is the applied shear force, Q is the statical moment of the portion of the section lying outside the neutral axis taken about the neutral axis, I is the moment of inertia, and t is the wall thickness. The shear constant is expressed as the ratio of the applied shear force to the maximum shear stress (Stelco 1981): V 2t I C RT = = [5b] τ max Q 5 CISC 2002
  • 6. A) Open Cross Sections 1. Doubly-Symmetric Wide-Flange Shapes (W-Shapes and I-Beams) Fig. 1a Fig. 1b Torsional section properties (flange-to-web fillets neglected): 2 b t 3 + d ′w 3 J= (Galambos 1968) [6] 3 Cw = (d ′)2 b 3 t (Galambos 1968, Picard and Beaulieu 1991) [7] 24 d′ = d − t [8] Example calculation: W610x125 d = 612 mm, b = 229 mm, t = 19.6 mm, w = 11.9 mm d' = 592 mm J = 1480 x 103 mm4 Cw = 3440 x 109 mm6 6 CISC 2002
  • 7. 2. Channels Fig. 2a Fig. 2b Torsional section properties (flange slope and flange-to-web fillets neglected): 2 b′ t 3 + d ′ w 3 J= (SSRC 1998) [9] 3 3 1 − 3 α α2  d ′ w  C w = (d ′) (b ′) t  2 + 1 +   (Galambos 1968, SSRC 1998) [10]  6 2  6 b ′ t   1 α= [11] d ′w 2+ 3 b′ t d′ = d − t , b′ = b − w 2 [12] Shear centre location: w xo = x + b′ α − (Galambos 1968, Seaburg and Carter 1997) [13] 2 Example calculation: C310x31 d = 305 mm, b = 74 mm, t = 12.7 mm, w = 7.2 mm (Actual flange slope = 1/6; zero slope assumed here for simplicity) d' = 292 mm, b' = 70.4 mm J = 132 x 103 mm4 α = 0.359, Cw = 29.0 x 109 mm6 x = 17.5 mm (formula not shown) xO = 39.2 mm 7 CISC 2002
  • 8. 3. Angles Fig. 3a Fig. 3b Torsional section properties (fillets neglected): J= (d ′ + b ′)t 3 [14] 3 Cw = t3 36 [ ] (d ′)3 + (b′)3 (Bleich 1952, Picard and Beaulieu 1991) [15] t t d′ = d − , b′ = b − [16] 2 2 The warping constant of angles is small and often neglected. For double angles, the values of J and Cw can be taken equal to twice the value for single angles. The shear centre (xO, yO) is located at the intersection of the angle leg axes. Example calculation: L203x102x13 d = 203 mm, b = 102 mm, t = 12.7 mm d' = 197 mm, b' = 95.7 mm J = 200 x 103 mm4 Cw = 0.485 x 109 mm6 8 CISC 2002
  • 9. 4. T-Sections Fig. 4a Fig. 4b Torsional section properties (flange-to-web fillets neglected): b t 3 + d ′w 3 J= [17] 3 b 3 t 3 (d ′) w 3 3 Cw = + (Bleich 1952, Picard and Beaulieu 1991) [18] 144 36 t d′ = d − [19] 2 The warping constant of T-sections is small and often neglected. The shear centre is located at the intersection of the flange and stem plate axes. Example calculation: WT180x67 d = 178 mm, b = 369 mm, t = 18.0 mm, w = 11.2 mm d' = 169 mm J = 796 x 103 mm4 Cw = 2.22 x 109 mm6 9 CISC 2002
  • 10. 5. Monosymmetric Wide-Flange Shapes Fig. 5a Fig. 5b Torsional section properties (fillet welds neglected): b1 t 1 + b2 t 2 + d ′ w 3 3 3 J= (SSRC 1998) [20] 3 (d ′)2 b13 t 1 α Cw = (SSRC 1998, Picard and Beaulieu 1991) [21] 12 1 α= [22] 1 + (b1 b2 ) (t 1 t 2 ) 3 (t 1 + t 2 ) d′ = d − [23] 2 Subscripts "1" and "2" refer to the top and bottom flanges, respectively, as shown on Fig. 5b. Shear centre location: t1 YO = YT − − α d ′ (Galambos 1968) [24] 2 The sign of YO calculated from Eq. 24 indicates whether the shear centre is located above (YO > 0) or below (YO < 0) the centroid. The shear centre is generally located between the centroid and the wider of the two flanges. For doubly-symmetric sections, YO is equal to zero since the centroid and shear centre coincide. 10 CISC 2002
  • 11. Monosymmetry constant:   I 2  Iy β X ≈ δ 0.9 (2 ρ − 1) d ′ 1 −  y   ,   ≤ 0.5 (Kitipornchai and Trahair 1980) [25]   Ix     Ix I y TOP ρ= = 1− α [26] Iy Eq. 25 is an approximate formula and is only valid if IY ≤ 0.5 IX, where IY and IX are the moments of inertia of the section about the vertical and horizontal centroidal axes, respectively. A more accurate expression is given by SSRC (1998). The value of δ depends on which flange is in compression: + 1 If the top flange is in compression δ = [27] − 1 If the bottom flange is in compression Generally, the value of βX obtained from Eq. 25 will be positive when the wider flange is in compression and negative when in tension. Example calculation: WRF1200x244 The top flange is in compression. d = 1200 mm, b1 = 300 mm, b2 = 550 mm, t1 = t2 = 20.0 mm, w = 12.0 mm d' = 1180 mm α = 0.860, ρ = 1 - α = 0.140 J = 2950 x 103 mm4 Cw = 53 900 x 109 mm6 YT = 695 mm (formula not shown) YO = -330 mm Since YO is negative, the shear centre is located between the centroid and the bottom flange. IX = 7240 x 106 mm4, IY = 322 x 106 mm4 (formulas not shown) IY / IX = 0.0445 < 0.5 OK δ = +1 βX = -763 mm (The top flange is narrower and in compression.) 11 CISC 2002
  • 12. 6. Wide-Flange Shapes with Channel Cap Fig. 6a Fig. 6b Torsional section properties (flange-to-web fillets neglected): A conservative estimate of the St. Venant torsional constant is given by: J ≈ JW + JC [28] The "w" and "c" subscripts refer to the W-shape and channel, respectively. A more refined expression for J is proposed by Ellifritt and Lue (1998). Shear centre location: tW + w C YO = YT − − a + e (Kitipornchai and Trahair 1980) [29] 2 a = (1 − ρ ) h , b = ρ h [30] I y TOP I y TOP ρ= = [31] I y TOP + I y BOT Iy where Iy TOP, Iy BOT, and Iy are the moments of inertia of the built-up top flange (channel + top flange of the W-shape), the bottom flange, and the entire built-up section about the vertical axis, respectively. With the channel cap on the top flange, as shown on Fig. 6, the value of YO obtained from Eq. 29 will be positive, indicating that the shear centre is located above the centroid. 12 CISC 2002
  • 13. The distance between the shear centres of the top and bottom flanges is given by: wC h = dW − tW + +e [32] 2 The distance between the shear centre of the built-up top flange and the centre line of the channel web and W-shape top flange, taken together as a single plate, is given by: 2 2 bC d C t C e= [33] 4 ρ Iy Warping constant of the built-up section: Cw = a 2 I y TOP + b 2 I y BOT (Kitipornchai and Trahair 1980) [34] A simplified formula for Cw is also given by Ellifritt and Lue (1998). Monosymmetry constant:   I 2   b  Iy β X ≈ δ 0.9 (2 ρ − 1) h 1 −  y   1 + C  , I   2d  ≤ 0.5 (Kitipornchai and Trahair 1980) [35]   x    Ix   where d is the built-up section depth: d = dW + w C [36] Eq. 35 is an approximation which is only valid if IY ≤ 0.5 IX, where Ix is the moment of inertia of the built-up section about the horizontal centroidal axis. See page 11 for the value of δ and the sign of βX . A further simplified expression is given by Ellifritt and Lue (1998). 13 CISC 2002
  • 14. Example calculation: W610x125 and C310x31 W-shape: W610x125 dW = 612 mm, bW = 229 mm, tW = 19.6 mm, wW = 11.9 mm JW = 1480 x 103 mm4 (previously calculated, p. 6) Channel cap: C310x31 dC = 305 mm, bC = 74 mm, tC = 12.7 mm, wC = 7.2 mm JC = 132 x 103 mm4 (previously calculated, p. 7) Built-up section, with the top flange in compression: J = 1610 x 103 mm4 YT = 255 mm (formula not shown) Iy TOP = 73.1 x 106 mm4 (formula not shown) Iy BOT = 19.6 x 106 mm4 (formula not shown) Iy = 92.7 x 106 mm4 ρ = 0.789 e = 22.1 mm h = 618 mm a = 130 mm b = 488 mm YO = 134 mm Since the calculated value of YO is positive, the shear centre is located above the centroid (see Fig. 6b). CW = 5900 x 109 mm6 Ix = 1260 x 106 mm4 (formula not shown) d = 619 mm Iy / Ix =0.0736 < 0.5 OK δ = +1 (top flange in compression) βX = 339 mm (wider top flange in compression) 14 CISC 2002
  • 15. B) Closed Cross Sections 7. Hollow Structural Sections (HSS), Round Fig. 7 St. Venant torsional constant (valid for any wall thickness): J = 2I = π 32 [d 4 − (d − 2 t ) 4 ] (Stelco 1981, Seaburg and Carter 1997) [37] where d is the outer diameter, I is the moment of inertia, and t is the wall thickness. The warping constant Cw is taken equal to zero. HSS torsional constant (valid for any wall thickness): 2J C= (Stelco 1981, Seaburg and Carter 1997) [38a] d HSS shear constant: 2t I C RT = (Stelco 1981) [38b] Q I= π 64 [d 4 − (d − 2 t ) 4 ] [39] Q= t 6 ( 3d 2 − 6d t + 4t 2 ) (Stelco 1981) [40] Example calculation: HSS324x9.5 d = 324 mm, t = 9.53 mm J = 233 000 x 103 mm4, I = 116 x 106 mm4 , Q = 471 x 103 mm3 C = 1440 x 103 mm3, CRT = 4710 mm2 15 CISC 2002
  • 16. 8. Hollow Structural Sections (HSS), Square and Rectangular Fig. 8 St. Venant torsional constant (valid for thin-walled sections, b / t ≥ 10): 2 4 AP t J≈ (Salmon and Johnson 1980) [41] p Mid-contour length: p = 2 [(d − t ) + (b − t )] − 2 RC (4 − π ) [42] Enclosed area: AP = (d − t )(b − t ) − RC (4 − π ) 2 [43] Mean corner radius: RO + R i RC = ≈ 1 .5 t [44] 2 where d and b are the longer and shorter outside dimensions, respectively, and t is the wall thickness. RO and Ri are the outer and inner corner radii taken equal to 2t and t, respectively. The warping constant Cw is usually taken equal to zero. 16 CISC 2002
  • 17. HSS torsional constant (valid for thin-walled sections, b / t ≥ 10): C ≈ 2 t Ap (Salmon and Johnson 1980, Seaburg and Carter 1997) [45a] HSS shear constant (approximate): C RT ≈ 2 t (h − 4 t ) (Stelco 1981) [45b] where h is the outer section dimension in the direction of the applied shear force. A more accurate expression is also given by Stelco (1981). Example calculation: HSS203x102x6.4 d = 203 mm, b = 102 mm, t = 6.35 mm RO = 12.7 mm Ri = 6.35 mm RC = 9.53 mm p = 568 mm Ap = 18 700 mm2 J = 15 600 x 103 mm4 It is assumed that the shear force acts in a direction parallel to the longer dimension, d. h = d = 203 mm C = 238 x 103 mm3 CRT = 2260 mm2 17 CISC 2002
  • 18. References Bleich, F. 1952. Buckling Strength of Metal Structures, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, N.Y. CISC. 1997. Structural Section Tables (SST Electronic Database), Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, Willowdale, Ont. CISC. 2000. Handbook of Steel Construction, 7th Edition, 2nd Revised Printing. Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, Willowdale, Ont. CSA. 1994. Limit States Design of Steel Structures. CSA Standard S16.1-94. Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont. CSA. 2000. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CSA Standard S6-00. Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont. El Darwish, I.A. and Johnston, B.G. 1965. Torsion of Structural Shapes. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 91, ST1. Errata: ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 92, ST1, Feb. 1966, p. 471. Ellifritt, D.S. and Lue, D.-M. 1998. Design of Crane Runway Beam with Channel Cap. Engineering Journal, AISC, 2nd Quarter. Galambos, T.V. 1968. Structural Members and Frames. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Kitipornchai, S. and Trahair, N.S. 1980. Buckling Properties of Monosymmetric I-Beams. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 106, ST5. Picard, A. and Beaulieu, D. 1991. Calcul des charpentes d'acier. Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, Willowdale, Ont. 18 CISC 2002
  • 19. Salmon, C.G. and Johnson, J.E. 1980. Steel Structures, Design and Behavior, 2nd Edition. Harper & Row, Publishers. New York, N.Y. Seaburg, P.A. and Carter, C.J. 1997. Torsional Analysis of Structural Steel Members. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill. SSRC. 1998. Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, 5th Edition. Edited by T.V. Galambos, Structural Stability Research Council, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. Stelco. 1981. Hollow Structural Sections - Sizes and Section Properties, 6th Edition. Stelco Inc., Hamilton, Ont. 19 CISC 2002