The regression model predicts customer satisfaction with 13 predictor variables. It explains 80.4% of the variance in satisfaction (R Square = .804). Delivery speed, technical support, product quality, e-commerce activities, and salesforce image were significant predictors of satisfaction, with salesforce image having the largest effect. The model was a good fit for the data (ANOVA p < .001).
13. NIKE
MULTIPLE REGRESSION(ENTER)
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Square Estimate
a
1 .767 .588 .541 1.164
a. Predictors: (Constant), Attitude, Intention, Preference, Awareness
a
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
b
Regression 67.592 4 16.898 12.482 .000
1 Residual 47.383 35 1.354
Total 114.975 39
a. Dependent Variable: Loyalty
b. Predictors: (Constant), Attitude, Intention, Preference, Awareness
a
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity Statistics
B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF
(Constant) .526 .692 .760 .452
Awareness .031 .172 .034 .180 .858 .328 3.045
1 Preference .059 .156 .055 .380 .706 .571 1.752
Intention .784 .117 .757 6.728 .000 .930 1.075
Attitude -.034 .166 -.038 -.206 .838 .339 2.948
a. Dependent Variable: Loyalty
14. MULTIPLE REGRESSION(STEPWISE)
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Square Estimate
a
1 .765 .585 .574 1.121
a. Predictors: (Constant), Intention
a
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
b
Regression 67.222 1 67.222 53.494 .000
1 Residual 47.753 38 1.257
Total 114.975 39
a. Dependent Variable: Loyalty
b. Predictors: (Constant), Intention
a
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity Statistics
B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF
(Constant) .737 .483 1.526 .135
1
Intention .792 .108 .765 7.314 .000 1.000 1.000
a. Dependent Variable: Loyalty
15. CORRELATION
Correlations
Loyalty Awareness Preference Intention Attitude
**
Pearson Correlation 1 .068 .193 .759 .081
Loyalty Sig. (2-tailed) .664 .215 .000 .604
N 44 43 43 43 43
** **
Pearson Correlation .068 1 .596 .031 .790
Awareness Sig. (2-tailed) .664 .000 .846 .000
N 43 44 43 43 43
** **
Pearson Correlation .193 .596 1 .226 .601
Preference Sig. (2-tailed) .215 .000 .145 .000
N 43 43 44 43 43
**
Pearson Correlation .759 .031 .226 1 .102
Intention Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .846 .145 .513
N 43 43 43 44 43
** **
Pearson Correlation .081 .790 .601 .102 1
Attitude Sig. (2-tailed) .604 .000 .000 .513
N 43 43 43 43 44
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
FACTOR ANALYSIS
a
Rotated Component Matrix
Component
1 2
Awareness .922 -.080
Attitude .914 -.023
Preference .798 .282
Intention .031 .984
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser
Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations.