Talk at International Symposium on Designing Semantics 15March, 2017, Kyoto, Japan.

1. Hideaki Takeda
National Institute of Informatics (NII)
International Symposium on Designing Semantics
15March, 2017, Kyoto, Japan
Design Process of Agriculture Ontologies

2. Standardization of Agricultural Activities
 Background
 Issues
 Purpose
Agricultural IT systems are widely adopted to manage and record activities
in the fields efficiently. Interoperability among these systems is needed to
integrate and analyze such records to improve productivity of agriculture.
To provide the standard vocabulary by defining the ontology for agricultural
activity
Data in agricultural IT systems is
not easy to federate and integrate
due to the variety of the languages
It prevents federation and
integration of these systems and
their data.
http://www.toukei.maff.go.jp/dijest/kome/kome05/kome05.html
しろかき
“Puddling”
砕土
“Pulverization”
代かき
“Puddling”
代掻き
“Puddling”
代掻き作業
“Puddling Activity”
荒代(かじり)
“Coarse pudding”
荒代かき
“Coarse pudding”
整地
“Land grading”
均平化
“land leveling”

3.  Define activity concepts
 Define hierarchy
Seeding:
activity to sow seeds on fields for seed propagation.
Purpose: seed propagation
Place : field
Target : seed
Act : sow
“Seeding”
Define activities with
properties and their values
The hierarchy of activities is organized by property
- New properties and their values are added
- “purpose”, “act”, “target”, “place”, “means” , “equipment”, “season”,
and “crop” in order.
- Property values are specialized
Seeding
property value
Agricultural Activity Ontology(AAO)

4.  Formalization by Description Logics
Crop production activity
Crop growth activity
purpose：crop production
purpose：crop growth
Agricultural activity
Activity for control of
propagation
Activity for seed
propagation
purpose：control of propagation
purpose：seed propagation
Seeding
act : sow
target：seed
place：field
Activity for seed
propagation
Seeding
Designing of Agricultural Activity Ontology(AAO)

5.  Differentiate concepts by property
purpose : seed propagation
place : paddy field
target : seed
act : sow
crop：rice
purpose : seed propagation purpose : seed propagation
place : field
target : seed
act : sow
Agricultural activity >…> Activity for seed propagation > Seeding
purpose : seed propagation
place : well-drained paddy field
target : seed
act : sow
crop：rice
Direct sowing of rice on well-drained paddy field Direct seeding in flooded paddy field
Well-drained paddy field < field paddy field < field
Designing of Agricultural Activity Ontology(AAO)

6. Activity for seeding Direct seeding in flooded paddy field
Direct sowing of rice on well-drained paddy field
Seeding on nursery box
 The Structuralizaion of the Agricultural Activities (Protégé)
Designing of Agricultural Activity Ontology(AAO)

7.  Polysemic concepts
[disjunction form]
[conjunction form]
Pudlling
Subsoil breaking
PulverizationLand preparation
Water retention
Activity for water
management
Land leveling
Polysemic
relationship
Pulverization by
harrow
purpose : pulverization
purpose : water retention
purpose : land leveling
Definition of agriculture activities with multiple purposes or other
properties.
Puddling
Designing of Agricultural Activity Ontology(AAO)

8. Water retention
Land leveling Pulverization
Puddling
 Polysemic concepts (Protégé)
Designing of Agricultural Activity Ontology(AAO)

9.  Synonym
Designing of Agricultural Activity Ontology(AAO)
Expressions in multiple languages are also represented as synonyms.
(It is important especially for non-English speaking countries)

10.  Reasoning by Ontology
Reasoning by Agriculture Activity Ontology
Activity for
biotic control
Activity for
suppression of
pest animals
Activity for
suppression of pest
animals by physical
means
control of
pest animals
Physical
means
means
(0,1)
purpose
(0,1)
Biotic control
purpose(0,1)
Activity for
suppression of pest
animals by chemical
means
Chemical
means
purpose
(0,1)
means
(0,1)
Making
scarecrow‘
suppression
of pest
animals
Purpose
(0,1)
build
act
(0,1)
scarecrow
target
(0,1)
Physical
means
Means
(0,1)
？ Example of「Making scarecrow」
?
suppression
of pest
animals
Infer the most feasible upper concept for the given constraints for a new words

11.  Reasoning by Ontology
かかし作り
物理的手段
means
(0,1)
means
(0,1)
Inference with SWCLOS
[1] Seiji Koide, Theory and Implementation of Object Oriented Semantic Web Language,
PhD Thesis, Graduate University for Advance Studies, 2011
[1]
[1]
Activity for
biotic control
Activity for
suppression of
pest animals
Activity for
suppression of pest
animals by physical
means
control of
pest animals
Physical
means
means
(0,1)
purpose
(0,1)
Biotic control
purpose(0,1)
suppression
of pest
animals
Activity for
suppression of pest
animals by chemical
means
Chemical
means
purpose
(0,1)
means
(0,1)
Making
scarecrow
make
act
(0,1)
scarecrow
target
(0,1)
Infer the most feasible upper concept for the given constraints for a new words
Reasoning by Agriculture Activity Ontology
Making scarecrow is a subclass of Activity for
suppression of pest animals by physical means

12. Applying Agricultural Activity Ontology
 URI
Give a unique URI for each concept
http://cavoc.org/aao/ns/1/は種

13. http://www.cavoc.org/ http://www.cavoc.org/aao
Web Services based on Agriculture Activity Ontology
• Version History
ver. 141: published on January 5, 2017. 410 words and concepts.
ver 1.33: published on September 23, 2016. 374 words and concepts,
ver 1.31 : published on April 22, 2016. 355 words collected, the concepts were classified with 8 attributes.
ver 1.10 : published on February 12, 2016. 330 words collected, new words are collected.
ver 1.00 : published on November 2, 2015. 301 words collected, defined with Description Logics, introduction
of property.
ver 0.94 : published on May 12, 2015. 185 words collected.

14. Web Services based on Agriculture Activity Ontology
 Data Sharing
The data of AAO can be downloaded in the RDF/Turtle formats from
cavoc.org/aao/.
we provide a SPARQL endpoint for users to explore AAO data using
SPARQL queries.
[the SPARQL Endpoint of AAO][Download]

15. Web Services based on Agriculture Activity Ontology
 Converting synonyms to core vocabulary
http://www.tanbo-kubota.co.jp/foods/watching/14_2.html
“Puddling Activity”
“sowing”
…
AAO
Puddling
Seeding
…
Converting
[system]
API
Puddling Activity
and sowing…
[system’]
Puddling
and seeding…

16. How did we build Agriculture Activity
Ontology?
• Share the experience of building ontologies
• Design Process
– 0th Step: Project Formation
– 1st Step: Survey
– 2nd Step: Analysis of Data
– 3rd Step: Proposed Structure (1st)
– 4th Step: Introduction of Descriptions Logics
– 5th Step: Evaluation and Enrichment by domain
experts

17. Design Process
- 0th Step: Project Formation -
• Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP),
“Technologies for creating next-generation agriculture, forestry and
fisheries” (funding agency: Bio-oriented Technology Research
Advancement Institution, NARO).
• Project aim: define common vocabulary on agriculture activity
– To share knowledge among farmers of different crops and different
regions and different systems
– Human understandable and machine readable
• Four members from two organizations
– Ontology Expert Researchers from National Institute of Informatics
(NII)
– Information Expert Researchers from National Agriculture and Food
Organization (NARO)

18. Design Process
- 1st Step: Survey -
• Survey of existing vocabularies
– Agrovoc: defined by FAO. Most popular and famous
vocabulary in the domain
• International
• Maintenance
• Machine readable (LOD)
– Agropedia
• In Japanese
• With explanations
– MAFF Guideline (prototype version)
• Official
• Related to Elements in Official Statistics

19. AGROVOC
 Thesaurus
AGROVOC organizes words by synonym, narrower/broader, and related
relationship.
harvesting topping(beets)
baling
gleaning
mechanical harvesting
mowing
AGROVOC
. . .
Narrower/broader relationship
is not clearly defined. So
relationship among bother
words are often mixed and
misunderstood.
relationship
between
siblings
AGROVOC is the most well-known vocabulary in agriculture supervised by
Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO) and the thesaurus containing
more than 32,000 terms of agriculture, fisheries, food, environment and
other related fields.
The number of activity names about rice farming, which is important in
Asia including Japan, are insufficient.

21. 農業ITシステムで用いる農作
業の名称に関する個別ガイ
ドライン（試行版）

22. Design Process
- 2nd Step: Analysis of data

24. Design Process
- 3rd Step: Proposed Structure (1st) -
 Define hierarchy clearly
 Accept various synonymous words
Hierarchy is convenient for human to understand and for computers to
process. But it often be confused by mixing different criteria on relationship
among concepts/words. It causes difficulty when adding new concepts/words
and when integrating different hierarchies.
Names for a single concept may be multiple by region and by crop
Define relationship clearly between upper
and lower concepts as basis of classification
Clarify an entry word and their synonyms for each concept
harvesting topping(beets)
baling
gleaning
mechanical harvesting
mowing
Thesaurus
(AGROVOC)
. . .
harvesting mechanical harvesting
manual harvesting
. . .
Inheritrelationship
between
siblings
Representation: ”Harvesting”

26. Design Process
- 4th Step: Introduction of Description Logics -
• Consideration of the structure
– Discovery of logical structure
– Reformation of the structure by Description Logics
• Use of a property for each is-a relation
– Introduction of a new property
– Is-a hierarchy of a property value
• Re-arrangement of classes
harvesting mechanical harvesting
manual harvesting
. . .
Harvest Harvest
Harvest
Inherit
byMachine
manually
＋
＋
Representation: ”Harvesting”
[Act]
Ontology
harvesting mechanical harvesting
manual harvesting
. . .
Representation: ”Harvesting”
[Means]
[Means]

27. Design Process
- 5th Step: Evaluation and Enrichment by domain experts -
• Ask evaluations to experts
– individual crops experts
– Farmer management system developer
• Feedback
– Some alternation of class structure
– Many new words
• Crop-specific words
• Area-specific words (dialect)

28. What we’ve learnt
• Survey and critics of existing vocabularies
– Understanding of pros and cons
– Fix the target
• Data-driven approach
– Avoid too abstract discussion
• Small group of knowledgeable persons of two sides
(domain and informatics)
– Constructive discussion
• Make the core then extend it
– Introduction of AI experts
– Introduction of more domain experts
• Communication is important

29. Crop Vocabulary (CVO)
• Next target: Standardize crop names
– ジャガイモ(jagaimo), 馬鈴薯(bareisho) poteto@en
– 大豆(daizu), 枝豆(edamame), soy@en
– …
• Crop Concept
– Crop name
• Synonym
– Japanese common name
• Scientific name
– Edible part
– Mature/Immature
– Other properties
• Planting method …

30. Data-driven
Crop names for
agricultural
chemicals
Guideline
name
(2017) CVO
Guideline
name
(2016)
Crop
statistics
Household
budget
survey
Vegetable
Code
MAFF
Encourage
varieties
Food
classifi
-cation

31. http://cavoc.org/
Common Agricultural VOCabulary
Agriculture Activity Ontology (AAO) ver 1.31
http://cavoc.org/aao/
Conclusion
There are no gold way to build ontologies. We adopt the bottom-up and
minimum commitment approach. It requires time and effort. We believe
that it is successful at least to build AAO.