1. Sub: Suggestion to Mr. Justice Verma on Amended to Rape Law.
1 message
Swarup Sarkar <swarup1972@gmail.com> Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:20 AM
To: justice.verma@nic.in
Bcc: "Saveindianfamily@yahoogroups.com" <saveindianfamily@yahoogroups.com>, mra-
collective@googlegroups.com
Sub: Suggestion to Mr. Justice Verma on Amended to Rape Law.
For details you can also visit my blog :
http://swarup1972.blogspot.in/2012/12/sub-suggestion-to-mr-justice-verma-on.html
Respected Sir,
I would like to bring your kind attention that as the family and institution of marriage get destroyed the
crime in society increase. Our LAW makers had made several duplication of law one sided and biased
with loophole by which men are under stress and ending their life as per crime bure reports every year
more than 88000 men ending their life and some instead of ending their own life, taking others life or
getting involved in crime.
In India , never discuss that we have some skewed definition of r@pe. After living for two years
or so as live-in-partners and sleeping in the same bed, to accuse the male partner of r@pe if he
refused to marry is the height absurdity. And police recording it as r@pe the culmination of
stupidity. Such stupid definition no country all over the world have. First need to plug this loop
hole first or cry for rape is increasing and increasing .
So, my humble request , law should not be on emotion and crime does not have any sex, caste or
religion , so the first priority the law should be gender neutral. If women do not do rape , they will not
be punished, but outright say, women do not do rape or sexual assault, is wrong and such mindset in
law making process will increase the crime in society.
In 2005 , when the DV act was passed, I begged to every one and witness in CNN-IBN Viedo, please
make the law gender neutral , as verbal abuse, mental abuse, economical abuse, sexual abuse, physical
abuse, both men and women do each others , but on one take that seriously and i cautioned that time
itself, such one sided biased law will create disharmony in society and crime will increase and after 3-
years all will have to cry crime is increasing and crime is increasing and today we witness the same
and commission formed.
Hope the same mistakes will not be done what was done in 2005 in Dv act.
For more details :
If Husband Failed to Repaire Washing Machine is Domestic Violence on women?
CNN-IBN Debate on Domestic Violence Act , 2005 Part-2 - YouTube
► 5:24 www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDv-e23ueQE
The day domestic violence passed in CNN-IBN I clearly mentioned the law is so biased the number of
cases will be increase and then all will start cry that domestic violence cases will increase and then you
will start cry and demand to make another law. Request all before reporting go through this Viedo and
ask the government why the Domestic violence act had not made gender neutral and treating Husbands
as Free Atm machine?
Use some common sense before claim the cases registered as truth as all women born in raja harish
chandra family and all men born in Criminal family.
So, my suggestion :
1. Sexual assault law should be gender neutral ( the word women/men should be replaced with
word person. If women do not do rape or sexual assault, they will not be punished).
Example :
Full news : Huma Khan sentenced to 3 years jail for torturing minor girl: Why Electronic media is