Enviar pesquisa
Carregar
Judge's opinion letter sanctions june 25 2015
•
0 gostou
•
485 visualizações
swanmail
Seguir
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Denunciar
Compartilhar
1 de 20
Baixar agora
Baixar para ler offline
Recomendados
Multi canaux, les parcours clients se complexifient. Il devient donc essentiel de redonner de la lisibilité à leurs performances. - Comment mettre en place les indicateurs de mesure multi-canal de vos parcours clients ? - Comment obtenir une vision 360° de vos clients ? - Comment réconcilier vos données multi sources (web analytics, bilan de campagnes marketing , CRM, données de facturation, satisfaction, engagement …) ? - Comment créer des tableaux de bord 100% utiles à chacun et référents pour tous ? En 45 mn, vous découvrirez les bonnes pratiques pour construire des tableaux de bord simples, fiables et économiques. Cette méthodologie est le fruit de notre modèle de scénarisation des parcours clients et de sa mesure en collaboration avec Report One, éditeur de logiciels d’aide au pilotage des entreprises.
Pilotez vos parcours client en réconciliant vos données marketing
Pilotez vos parcours client en réconciliant vos données marketing
Report One
referendum 1ère Dame de France
Grand referendum d’initiative populaire
Grand referendum d’initiative populaire
Mathiot Olivier
:D
T1 u1.lopezsamuel
T1 u1.lopezsamuel
Sam Lopez
Livre Blanc Professional Services
Livre Blanc Professional Services
Julien Goossens
Moyennes minimales
Moyennes minimales
Harrag Nasr
Projet de jardin collectif
Projet en permaculture et serres passives de l'Association Jardins Collectifs...
Projet en permaculture et serres passives de l'Association Jardins Collectifs...
Carmen Cita
3 a e t c c toledo 10 12-13
3 a e t c c toledo 10 12-13
franson78
AL556 Kyrie messe du peuple de Dieu
AL556 Kyrie messe du peuple de Dieu
AL556 Kyrie messe du peuple de Dieu
Paroisse d'Assesse
Recomendados
Multi canaux, les parcours clients se complexifient. Il devient donc essentiel de redonner de la lisibilité à leurs performances. - Comment mettre en place les indicateurs de mesure multi-canal de vos parcours clients ? - Comment obtenir une vision 360° de vos clients ? - Comment réconcilier vos données multi sources (web analytics, bilan de campagnes marketing , CRM, données de facturation, satisfaction, engagement …) ? - Comment créer des tableaux de bord 100% utiles à chacun et référents pour tous ? En 45 mn, vous découvrirez les bonnes pratiques pour construire des tableaux de bord simples, fiables et économiques. Cette méthodologie est le fruit de notre modèle de scénarisation des parcours clients et de sa mesure en collaboration avec Report One, éditeur de logiciels d’aide au pilotage des entreprises.
Pilotez vos parcours client en réconciliant vos données marketing
Pilotez vos parcours client en réconciliant vos données marketing
Report One
referendum 1ère Dame de France
Grand referendum d’initiative populaire
Grand referendum d’initiative populaire
Mathiot Olivier
:D
T1 u1.lopezsamuel
T1 u1.lopezsamuel
Sam Lopez
Livre Blanc Professional Services
Livre Blanc Professional Services
Julien Goossens
Moyennes minimales
Moyennes minimales
Harrag Nasr
Projet de jardin collectif
Projet en permaculture et serres passives de l'Association Jardins Collectifs...
Projet en permaculture et serres passives de l'Association Jardins Collectifs...
Carmen Cita
3 a e t c c toledo 10 12-13
3 a e t c c toledo 10 12-13
franson78
AL556 Kyrie messe du peuple de Dieu
AL556 Kyrie messe du peuple de Dieu
AL556 Kyrie messe du peuple de Dieu
Paroisse d'Assesse
historia del perú. cultura huarmey
Los profanado gran hallazgo wari en huarmey
Los profanado gran hallazgo wari en huarmey
Candy Ubillús
Soudan, RCA, Tchad ... SOLIDARITES Au cœur de l'urgence humanitaire
S 08f - Soudan, RCA, Tchad… SOLIDARITES au cœur de l'urgence humanitaire (Fr...
S 08f - Soudan, RCA, Tchad… SOLIDARITES au cœur de l'urgence humanitaire (Fr...
Bernard hardy
Taller 7
Taller 7
Kimberlyxita Castillo
Retrouvez la présentation de retour d'expérience utilisateurs de la plateforme Simplicité. Qui de mieux pour en parler que des clients satisfaits. Partie 1 : Présentation de la plateforme Simplicité Partie 2 : Témoignage de la startup Lofty Partie 3: Témoignage d'un client grand compte Silca filiale du groupe Crédit-Agricole Partie 4 : IBM
Retour d'expérience - Simplicité Software - 3 février 2016
Retour d'expérience - Simplicité Software - 3 février 2016
Simplicité Software
Trachéites
Trachéites
Leyrissoux Catherine
Presentation in French of a e-learning project about sustainable energy education in secondary schools in 9 Eueopean conutries
E Path Lyon 02 2009
E Path Lyon 02 2009
eddyderuwe
Album activites
Album activites
AlexandraDoc
Lineas de tiempo
Lineas de tiempo
Yasly Daniela Peña
CL601 Louange et Gloire à ton nom
CL601 Louange et Gloire à ton nom
CL601 Louange et Gloire à ton nom
Paroisse d'Assesse
Présentation du projet et des activités
Présentation du projet et des activités
Bassirou Ngom
CURRICULUM VITAE
CURRICULUM VITAE
Kambire Ollo
Joseph & joseph spmw012 hc mesure spaghettis blanc vert
Joseph & joseph spmw012 hc mesure spaghettis blanc vert
sabaron32421
catholic
Je 2009 prier devant le saint sacrement
Je 2009 prier devant le saint sacrement
lefilsduforgeron
presentation la bourgogne
Un voyage au coeur de la bourgogne
Un voyage au coeur de la bourgogne
Marisa Diaz
Un échantillon de la vie sauvage dans la Réserve de Biosphère de la Pendjari, dans le Nord-Ouest du Bénin. Classifié selon la Liste Rouge de l'UICN. A sample of wildlife of the Pendjari Biosphere Reserve in the North-West of Benin (West-Africa). Classified following the Red List of the IUCN.
UICN Liste Rouge Pendjari
UICN Liste Rouge Pendjari
Jan De Pelseneer
Exposicion eme -DDM
Exposicion eme -DDM
Julian Duarte
In the Application, Fisher certified to the Court that he had “not been reprimanded in any court nor ha[d] there been any action in any court pertaining to [his] conduct or fitness as a member of the bar.” Upon review of the Application, the Court took judicial notice of the fact that Fisher had been publicly reprimanded on January 30, 2014 under procedures established in Part Six, § IV, ¶ 13-15.B.4 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. In the Matter of Douglass Hayden Fisher, VSB Docket No. 13-032-094098 (3d. District Subcommittee, Sec. II 2014). The Virginia State Bar entered its reprimand of Fisher after two hearings conducted on December 20, 2013 and January 23, 2014. The Virginia State Bar found that Fisher had violated several Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. Specifically, the Virginia State Bar found that Fisher had violated rules pertaining to diligence, communication, safekeeping of property, and declining or terminating representation. Fisher did not appeal the reprimand to the Supreme Court of Virginia. See Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Part VI, § IV, ¶13-26.
Show Cause Fisher US Bankruptcy Court
Show Cause Fisher US Bankruptcy Court
swanmail
Fisher explained that after speaking with another attorney about the matter, he decided that disclosure of the public reprimand was not necessary. Fisher advised that he had filed the Application in haste at the request of a client. Fisher explained that he had wanted to avoid drawing attention to the disciplinary action taken by the Virginia State Bar. Fisher contended that he did not mislead the Court by failing to make the disclosure requested in the Application because the reprimand was public. Fisher argued that, as the reprimand had come from an agency of the Supreme Court of Virginia, and not from the Supreme Court itself, there had been no action in “any court” pertaining to his conduct or fitness. Accordingly, he concluded that disclosure of the reprimand was not technically required.
Fisher's Application to US Bankruptcy Court
Fisher's Application to US Bankruptcy Court
swanmail
The Court concludes that Fisher should be sanctioned for his reprehensible conduct. The minimum appropriate sanction sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct in the future is the denial of Fisher’s Application. Fisher will not be permitted to practice before this Court. The Court finds Fisher’s conscious decision to withhold information concerning the public reprimand violated the duty of candor Fisher owed to the Court.* The certification made by Fisher in his Application was materially incorrect. It was both false and misleading. *Rule 3.3(a)(1) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct provides: “A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal.”
Hayden Fisher "false and misleading" answers in US Court
Hayden Fisher "false and misleading" answers in US Court
swanmail
Swanenburg's Opposition to Motion for Sanctions. Ironically, Swanenburg through his attorney, D. Hayden Fisher now suggests that it is the defendant that is using the legal system to bully him. Swanenburg and his attorney file 3 lawsuits that extend over the course of 4 years, nonsuit in the middle of a trial and now accuse the defendant of piling on the paper.
Swanenburg Response to Sanctions
Swanenburg Response to Sanctions
swanmail
Swanenburg files his second case against Boward in February 2013. Nonsuit with Prejudice in the pendency of sanctions.
Case File Log Swanenburg v Boward TI
Case File Log Swanenburg v Boward TI
swanmail
Swanenburg files his first case against Boward on June 23, 2011 over one year after he is terminated by CNU
Case File Log Swanenburg v. Boward
Case File Log Swanenburg v. Boward
swanmail
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Destaque
historia del perú. cultura huarmey
Los profanado gran hallazgo wari en huarmey
Los profanado gran hallazgo wari en huarmey
Candy Ubillús
Soudan, RCA, Tchad ... SOLIDARITES Au cœur de l'urgence humanitaire
S 08f - Soudan, RCA, Tchad… SOLIDARITES au cœur de l'urgence humanitaire (Fr...
S 08f - Soudan, RCA, Tchad… SOLIDARITES au cœur de l'urgence humanitaire (Fr...
Bernard hardy
Taller 7
Taller 7
Kimberlyxita Castillo
Retrouvez la présentation de retour d'expérience utilisateurs de la plateforme Simplicité. Qui de mieux pour en parler que des clients satisfaits. Partie 1 : Présentation de la plateforme Simplicité Partie 2 : Témoignage de la startup Lofty Partie 3: Témoignage d'un client grand compte Silca filiale du groupe Crédit-Agricole Partie 4 : IBM
Retour d'expérience - Simplicité Software - 3 février 2016
Retour d'expérience - Simplicité Software - 3 février 2016
Simplicité Software
Trachéites
Trachéites
Leyrissoux Catherine
Presentation in French of a e-learning project about sustainable energy education in secondary schools in 9 Eueopean conutries
E Path Lyon 02 2009
E Path Lyon 02 2009
eddyderuwe
Album activites
Album activites
AlexandraDoc
Lineas de tiempo
Lineas de tiempo
Yasly Daniela Peña
CL601 Louange et Gloire à ton nom
CL601 Louange et Gloire à ton nom
CL601 Louange et Gloire à ton nom
Paroisse d'Assesse
Présentation du projet et des activités
Présentation du projet et des activités
Bassirou Ngom
CURRICULUM VITAE
CURRICULUM VITAE
Kambire Ollo
Joseph & joseph spmw012 hc mesure spaghettis blanc vert
Joseph & joseph spmw012 hc mesure spaghettis blanc vert
sabaron32421
catholic
Je 2009 prier devant le saint sacrement
Je 2009 prier devant le saint sacrement
lefilsduforgeron
presentation la bourgogne
Un voyage au coeur de la bourgogne
Un voyage au coeur de la bourgogne
Marisa Diaz
Un échantillon de la vie sauvage dans la Réserve de Biosphère de la Pendjari, dans le Nord-Ouest du Bénin. Classifié selon la Liste Rouge de l'UICN. A sample of wildlife of the Pendjari Biosphere Reserve in the North-West of Benin (West-Africa). Classified following the Red List of the IUCN.
UICN Liste Rouge Pendjari
UICN Liste Rouge Pendjari
Jan De Pelseneer
Exposicion eme -DDM
Exposicion eme -DDM
Julian Duarte
Destaque
(16)
Los profanado gran hallazgo wari en huarmey
Los profanado gran hallazgo wari en huarmey
S 08f - Soudan, RCA, Tchad… SOLIDARITES au cœur de l'urgence humanitaire (Fr...
S 08f - Soudan, RCA, Tchad… SOLIDARITES au cœur de l'urgence humanitaire (Fr...
Taller 7
Taller 7
Retour d'expérience - Simplicité Software - 3 février 2016
Retour d'expérience - Simplicité Software - 3 février 2016
Trachéites
Trachéites
E Path Lyon 02 2009
E Path Lyon 02 2009
Album activites
Album activites
Lineas de tiempo
Lineas de tiempo
CL601 Louange et Gloire à ton nom
CL601 Louange et Gloire à ton nom
Présentation du projet et des activités
Présentation du projet et des activités
CURRICULUM VITAE
CURRICULUM VITAE
Joseph & joseph spmw012 hc mesure spaghettis blanc vert
Joseph & joseph spmw012 hc mesure spaghettis blanc vert
Je 2009 prier devant le saint sacrement
Je 2009 prier devant le saint sacrement
Un voyage au coeur de la bourgogne
Un voyage au coeur de la bourgogne
UICN Liste Rouge Pendjari
UICN Liste Rouge Pendjari
Exposicion eme -DDM
Exposicion eme -DDM
Mais de swanmail
In the Application, Fisher certified to the Court that he had “not been reprimanded in any court nor ha[d] there been any action in any court pertaining to [his] conduct or fitness as a member of the bar.” Upon review of the Application, the Court took judicial notice of the fact that Fisher had been publicly reprimanded on January 30, 2014 under procedures established in Part Six, § IV, ¶ 13-15.B.4 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. In the Matter of Douglass Hayden Fisher, VSB Docket No. 13-032-094098 (3d. District Subcommittee, Sec. II 2014). The Virginia State Bar entered its reprimand of Fisher after two hearings conducted on December 20, 2013 and January 23, 2014. The Virginia State Bar found that Fisher had violated several Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. Specifically, the Virginia State Bar found that Fisher had violated rules pertaining to diligence, communication, safekeeping of property, and declining or terminating representation. Fisher did not appeal the reprimand to the Supreme Court of Virginia. See Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Part VI, § IV, ¶13-26.
Show Cause Fisher US Bankruptcy Court
Show Cause Fisher US Bankruptcy Court
swanmail
Fisher explained that after speaking with another attorney about the matter, he decided that disclosure of the public reprimand was not necessary. Fisher advised that he had filed the Application in haste at the request of a client. Fisher explained that he had wanted to avoid drawing attention to the disciplinary action taken by the Virginia State Bar. Fisher contended that he did not mislead the Court by failing to make the disclosure requested in the Application because the reprimand was public. Fisher argued that, as the reprimand had come from an agency of the Supreme Court of Virginia, and not from the Supreme Court itself, there had been no action in “any court” pertaining to his conduct or fitness. Accordingly, he concluded that disclosure of the reprimand was not technically required.
Fisher's Application to US Bankruptcy Court
Fisher's Application to US Bankruptcy Court
swanmail
The Court concludes that Fisher should be sanctioned for his reprehensible conduct. The minimum appropriate sanction sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct in the future is the denial of Fisher’s Application. Fisher will not be permitted to practice before this Court. The Court finds Fisher’s conscious decision to withhold information concerning the public reprimand violated the duty of candor Fisher owed to the Court.* The certification made by Fisher in his Application was materially incorrect. It was both false and misleading. *Rule 3.3(a)(1) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct provides: “A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal.”
Hayden Fisher "false and misleading" answers in US Court
Hayden Fisher "false and misleading" answers in US Court
swanmail
Swanenburg's Opposition to Motion for Sanctions. Ironically, Swanenburg through his attorney, D. Hayden Fisher now suggests that it is the defendant that is using the legal system to bully him. Swanenburg and his attorney file 3 lawsuits that extend over the course of 4 years, nonsuit in the middle of a trial and now accuse the defendant of piling on the paper.
Swanenburg Response to Sanctions
Swanenburg Response to Sanctions
swanmail
Swanenburg files his second case against Boward in February 2013. Nonsuit with Prejudice in the pendency of sanctions.
Case File Log Swanenburg v Boward TI
Case File Log Swanenburg v Boward TI
swanmail
Swanenburg files his first case against Boward on June 23, 2011 over one year after he is terminated by CNU
Case File Log Swanenburg v. Boward
Case File Log Swanenburg v. Boward
swanmail
case filed in 2012 against CNU Lacrosse Player's Father. CASE DISMISSED with Prejudice
Case File Log Swanenburg v Elliott
Case File Log Swanenburg v Elliott
swanmail
Caution: This document contains repugnantly racist language Transcript from a Motion for Sufficiency hearing conducted on October 21, 2014. Swanenburg's attorney spends much of the hearing complaining about WilliamsburgLax.com and it's author. Nonetheless, Swanenburg changed many of his admissions from deny to admit.
Transcript of proceedings 10 21 2014
Transcript of proceedings 10 21 2014
swanmail
Swanenburg's Sad Saga Ends! On April 1, 2015 Swanenburg's Sad Saga ended when a jury found for the defendant effectively ending his four year reign of legal terrorism against his former assistant coach. A Motion for Sanctions was filed on April 22, 2015 against Swanenburg and his attorney, D. Hayden Fisher essentially arguing that Swanenburg and Fisher violated the rules of the court. § 8.01-271.1. Signing of pleadings, motions, and other papers; oral motions; sanctions. Except as otherwise provided in §§ 16.1-260 and 63.2-1901, every pleading, written motion, and other paper of a party represented by an attorney shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in his individual name, and the attorney's address shall be stated on the first pleading filed by that attorney in the action. A party who is not represented by an attorney, including a person confined in a state or local correctional facility proceeding pro se, shall sign his pleading, motion, or other paper and state his address. The signature of an attorney or party constitutes a certificate by him that (i) he has read the pleading, motion, or other paper, (ii) to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry, it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and (iii) it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading, written motion, or other paper is not signed, it shall be stricken unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or movant. An oral motion made by an attorney or party in any court of the Commonwealth constitutes a representation by him that (i) to the best of his knowledge, information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law, and (ii) it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed or made in violation of this rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, shall impose upon the person who signed the paper or made the motion, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred because of the filing of the pleading, motion, or other paper or making of the motion, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Swanenburg v. Boward CL1400580V-04 Case File Log
Swanenburg v. Boward CL1400580V-04 Case File Log
swanmail
ORDER (Contempt ofCourt for Failure to Appear) THIS MATTER is before the Court on a rule requiring Counsel for Plaintiff, Douglass Hayden Fisher, Esquire, to show cause why he should not be held in Contempt of Court for failure to appear before the Court for an Initial Pretrial Conference, which occurred on July 10, 2014. A copy ofthe rule was personally served on Counsel for Plaintiff by the U.S. Marshal. At the show cause hearing on August 5, 2014, the Court held Counsel for Plaintiff in CONTEMPT OF COURT and ORDERED Counsel for Plaintiff to pay a $200 fine within ten (10) days ofthe date ofthis Order. Payment SHALL be made to the Clerk, U.S. District Court
Contempt of Court Douglass Hayden Fisher
Contempt of Court Douglass Hayden Fisher
swanmail
"...you may have engaged in inappropriate conduct to include excessive profanity and berating of players." "We have discussed your conduct before.." "The University is terminating your employment..."
Swanenburg Suspension & Termination Letters March 2010
Swanenburg Suspension & Termination Letters March 2010
swanmail
The Honorable Timothy S. Fisher, Seventh Judicial Circuit rules that Swanenburg's previously non-suited defamation case will proceed as Defamation per quod and that Defamation per se is Dismissed with Prejudice. Judge Fisher also strikes 3 paragraphs from the amended complaint and leaving two others subject to evidentiary rulings.
Judge's Order & Opinion August 14 2014
Judge's Order & Opinion August 14 2014
swanmail
Swanenburg's letter as part of his continuing actions against the coach that replaced him after what he refers to as his "unlawful termination". This letter was apparently written over two years after his alleged discovery that predicated his first lawsuit. In this letter Swanenburg states that he will be filing at least two additional suits. Swanenburg also makes additional allegations against his former assistant coach with allegations allegedly obtained in discovery presumably from deposition testimony of another assistant coach who was part of the coaching staff that succeeded Swanenburg. Swanenburg also invokes the tragedies at the University of Virginia and Virginia Tech in a seemingly despicable attempt to bring legal scrutiny on to his former assistant coach.
Swanenburg Letter to Martin
Swanenburg Letter to Martin
swanmail
Letter written by Swanenburg on June 24, 2010 apparently pleading his dissatisfaction with the university after his departure. The letter appears to be in response to the university's denial of his request for a board hearing. Swanenburg's letter claims that the university intentionally harmed him, and "to fire a coach in the middle of a playing season suggests gross misconduct". Swanenburg also invokes the tragedy involving the lacrosse programs at the University of Virginia. Ironically, the letter is dated June 24, 2010 which is the same day that Swanenburg pleads that defamatory comments were made about him. Apparently, the letter is significant because it appears to be the beginning of the potentially frivolous litigation that has now lasted over 4 years.
Swanenburg Letter to Board of Visitors
Swanenburg Letter to Board of Visitors
swanmail
Swanenburg Letter to Gov. McDonnell
Swanenburg Letter to Gov. McDonnell
swanmail
Excerpted testimony of Christopher T. Swanenburg, August 26, 2013. Swananburg testifies at the trial.
Swanenburg Excerpted Testimony
Swanenburg Excerpted Testimony
swanmail
Caution: Very graphic and offensive language contained within Swanenburg's answers to Defendant's first set of Interrogatories. Interrogatory #12 is particularly disturbing.
Plaintiff's [Swanenburg] Answers to Defendants First Set Interrogatories
Plaintiff's [Swanenburg] Answers to Defendants First Set Interrogatories
swanmail
Nonsuit with prejudice order in tortious interference case against Boward. Nonsuit was asked for by plaintiff's attorney after sanctions were heard and court's decision was pending. Shortly after this order Swanenburg filed his second defamation case against Boward essentially arguing the same elements that were plead in this case.
Swanenburg Nonsuit Order in Tortious Interference Case
Swanenburg Nonsuit Order in Tortious Interference Case
swanmail
Swanenburg's second defamation suit against Boward. This suit alleges that Boward is now responsible for declining enrollment in Capital Lacrosse enrollment. Swanenburg now seeks $500,000 in compensatory and $350,000 in punitive damages. Suit was filed after Swanenburg was granted nonsuit in first defamation suit. Swanenburg now complains that defendant is tortiously interfering with his lacrosse business, does not specify damages.
Swanenburg Second Defamation Suit against CNU Lacrosse Coach
Swanenburg Second Defamation Suit against CNU Lacrosse Coach
swanmail
Motion for Sanctions in Swanenburg v. Boward. Sanctions contend that the actions Swanenburg has taken against Boward are filed for improper purpose. September 2013
Defendant's Motion for Sanctions
Defendant's Motion for Sanctions
swanmail
Mais de swanmail
(20)
Show Cause Fisher US Bankruptcy Court
Show Cause Fisher US Bankruptcy Court
Fisher's Application to US Bankruptcy Court
Fisher's Application to US Bankruptcy Court
Hayden Fisher "false and misleading" answers in US Court
Hayden Fisher "false and misleading" answers in US Court
Swanenburg Response to Sanctions
Swanenburg Response to Sanctions
Case File Log Swanenburg v Boward TI
Case File Log Swanenburg v Boward TI
Case File Log Swanenburg v. Boward
Case File Log Swanenburg v. Boward
Case File Log Swanenburg v Elliott
Case File Log Swanenburg v Elliott
Transcript of proceedings 10 21 2014
Transcript of proceedings 10 21 2014
Swanenburg v. Boward CL1400580V-04 Case File Log
Swanenburg v. Boward CL1400580V-04 Case File Log
Contempt of Court Douglass Hayden Fisher
Contempt of Court Douglass Hayden Fisher
Swanenburg Suspension & Termination Letters March 2010
Swanenburg Suspension & Termination Letters March 2010
Judge's Order & Opinion August 14 2014
Judge's Order & Opinion August 14 2014
Swanenburg Letter to Martin
Swanenburg Letter to Martin
Swanenburg Letter to Board of Visitors
Swanenburg Letter to Board of Visitors
Swanenburg Letter to Gov. McDonnell
Swanenburg Letter to Gov. McDonnell
Swanenburg Excerpted Testimony
Swanenburg Excerpted Testimony
Plaintiff's [Swanenburg] Answers to Defendants First Set Interrogatories
Plaintiff's [Swanenburg] Answers to Defendants First Set Interrogatories
Swanenburg Nonsuit Order in Tortious Interference Case
Swanenburg Nonsuit Order in Tortious Interference Case
Swanenburg Second Defamation Suit against CNU Lacrosse Coach
Swanenburg Second Defamation Suit against CNU Lacrosse Coach
Defendant's Motion for Sanctions
Defendant's Motion for Sanctions
Baixar agora
