This document summarizes Bjork's analysis, a method developed by orthodontist Arne Bjork to analyze craniofacial growth and development using lateral cephalograms. It describes Bjork's landmarks, angular and linear measurements used to construct a facial diagram. Bjork conducted studies on Scandinavian children to establish norms for comparison. His analysis helps determine the amount and distribution of facial prognathism based on configurations in the facial diagram.
3. Dr ARNE BJORK (1911-1996)
●
●
●
Arne Björk was born on 1911 in Dalarne, Sweden.
After his dental training in Stockholm, he practised
dentistry from 1937 to 1951.
During these years he also studied anthropology
and genetics at the Swedish Institute
for Human Genetics.
In 1947 he published the famous
dissertation “The Face in Profile”.
4. ●
●
●
●
1949-1950 chairman of orthodontics in Malmo,
Sweden
1951-1981 professor of orthodontics in Royal
Dental college, Denmark
1973 received the Ketcham award of Am. Board of
orthodontics.
1980 nominated as member of World Federation of
Orthodontics
5. Bjork conducted a study in 1951 using metal implants
to find the sites of growth and resorption in individual
jaws, and individual variation in direction and
intensity.
Bjork gave seven structural signs to find the
direction of mandibular growth rotation.
10. TYPE II
Centre is at the most distal occluding
molars.
This occurs in connection with
growth in the sagittal direction at the
condyles.
The soft tissue of the chin may not
follow this movement and a
characteristic double chin may form.
Difficulty in closing lips without
strain.
11. The seven signs were:
1.Inclination of the Condylar head.
2.Curvature of the Mandibular canal.
3.Shape of the lower border of mandible.
4.Inclination of the Symphysis.
5.Interincisal angle.
6.Intermolar or Interpremolar angles.
7.Lower Anterior face height.
19. BJORK'S ANALYSIS
Three groups of Scandinavian(Swedish) male school
children:
Group I – 20 twelve year old
Group II – 322 twelve year old
Group III -281 high school graduates.
Roentgenograms taken at a distance of 155 cms were used.
The facial diagram was constructed and analysed.
20. He put forward a facial diagram in which the linear and
angular configurations determine the amount and
distribution of facial prognathism.
This facial diagram that implicates these changes
constitutes the Bjork’s Analysis.
21. LANDMARKS USED WERE:
A – Articulare.
Gn – Gnathion.
Pg – Pogonion.
Id – Infradentale.
Sp – spina nasalis anterior (ANS)
Dd – Chin angle, pt of intersection
of mandibular plane and line
tangent to ID and pogonion.
22. Pr – Prosthion
Kk – gonial angle
The plane of reference he took was
the SN plane.
23. Construction of facial diagram
A line drawn from the
prosthion to ANS to the
nasion, to the center of
sella turcica (S), to
articulare to the Gonial
angle (KK), to Chin angle
(DD), and from these to
infradentale (Id).
24. ANGULAR MEASUREMENTS
●
Angles formed by lines at N
●
Angles formed by lines at S
●
Angle formed by lines at Ar
●
Angle formed by lines at KK
●
Angle formed by lines at DD
25. ANGLES AT NASION
These measures the facial
profile in relation to
the cranial base.
Max. Alv. Prog. 84±3
Mand. Alv. Prog.79±6
26. ANGLE AT SELLA
●
It provides a means of
measuring the shape
of the cranial base.
123°±5
36. Facial prognathism may be due to
–
Shortening of the cranial base.
–
Angular deflection of the cranial base.
–
A small ramus – cranial base angle.
–
Increased jaw length.
37.
38. PARAMETERS
BJORK'S NORMS
PT. VALUE
INFERENCE
SADDLE ANGLE
123°±5
124°
NORMAL
Ar ANGLE
143°±6
141°
NORMAL
Go ANGLE (KK)
128°±7
126°
NORMAL
SN LINE
71±3cm
71cm
NORMAL
SAr LINE
32±3cm
40cm
INCREAED THAN NORMAL
ArKK LINE
44±5cm
57cm
INCREASED THAN NORMAL
KK-DD LINE
71±5cm
87cm
INCREASED THAN NORMAL