Pro Death Penalty Persuasive Speech

Pro Death Penalty Speech
Pro Death Penalty Persuasive Speech
It is October 1978 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Roger Stafford; his wife, Verna; and his brother,
Harold entered the Sirloin Stockade restaurant and without any remorse or sympathy, brutally
gunned down 6 people, 4 of them young teenagers.The gruesome scene depicted five bodie piled
atop each other, their blood forming a slick pool that covered the floor and stained the surrounding
boxes of ground beef patties and Wisconsin blue cheese.
That was not Staffords' first killings, less than a month before this trio of cold–blooded killers fatally
shot a North Dakota family of three. Verna Stafford first lured the family driving in their car,
pretending to be a stranded motorist....show more content...
Some are allowed to publish books while serving life sentences in prison. Many of these murderers
brag about their sick crimes and some have even sent letters from prison to the victims families
boasting how they enjoyed killing their loved one in gruesome detail. The family is forced to relive
the crime again and again. The animals who committed a heinous crime of murder should not escape
with lesser punishments and it is only logical to award him/her death penalty. Professor van den
Haag, a psychoanalyst and adjunct professor at New
York University had this to say "I hold life sacred, ...I feel that anyone who takes some one's life
should know that thereby he forsakes his own" (qtd. in prodeathpenalty.com) If these killers are
given life sentences or in some cases lesser jail sentences, these animals could be set free to kill
again. They are a danger to society as studies have shown that 10% of people convicted of murder
will indeed murder again. The victim 's families and witnesses that may have testified in court live
in fear of retaliation from the free murderer.Some prisoner 's who are serving life sentences for
murder have even escaped from prison. For example, Michael
Rodriguez, sentenced only to life sentence for heinous murder, joined six other criminals in
overpowering prison employees in Connolly, Texas in 2001.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Pro Death Penalty Research Paper
The death penalty may seem perfectly fine and isn't something you think about often, but first read
the arguments for and against, you may just change your mind. Three disadvantages of the death
penalty are as follows: it costs taxpayers several times more than to keep a prisoner for life, it
violates the "cruel and unusual" punishments in the bill of rights, and sometimes innocent people
are put to death.To hold a death row inmate costs $90,000 more per year than to keep a prisoner
for life. 130 people have been released from death row because they were innocent. A quote from
Tim Kaine (2016 vice presidential candidate) against the death penalty: "My faith teaches that life is
sacred. That's why I personally oppose the death penalty. But

Pro Death Penalty
The Death Penalty, first established in the 18th Century B.C, is a punishment of execution for those
who are legally convicted of capital murder. The death penalty is legal in 32 U.S. states. The death
penalty should not be legal in America because it does not deter crime effectively, it is very costly,
mistakes could be made, and it is unconstitutional.
Many questions arise from this punishment because there is no real justification. The death penalty
should not be legal because it does not deter crime effectively as it should. There is no credible
evidence that capital punishment deters crime. The death penalty advocates that it would deter crime
but that is not the case. Studies have consistently failed to demonstrate that executions deter...show
more content...
Keeping the death penalty would make Americans wary of how their government is running. Many
of the amendments contradict with the penalty. For example, Amendment 5 states, "No person shall
be held for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand
Jury" (Death Penalty). Another example of an amendment which contradicts with death penalty is
amendment 8. Amendment 8 states that, "excessive bail should not be required, nor excessive fines
imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted" (Death Penalty). This is a prime example of
how the death penalty contradicts the constitution because death is not only a cruel punishment but
also unusual. Another example of how the death penalty is unconstitutional is the investigation done
by CNN. CNN found out that a judge even disagreed with the death penanty, "a federal judge said
Wednesday the system is so broken it unfairly leaves inmates with uncertain fates, often for decades."
(Almasy). "In his decision, Santa Ana–based Judge Cormac J. Carney vacated the 1995 death
sentence of Ernest D. Jones, who petitioned the court to determine whether his death sentence was
valid" (Almasy). This means that the judge does not know whether convicted of capital

The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty
Professor O
Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely heinous crimes, is a practice
that's been around for along time. In the later half of the twentieth century, it has become a
controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I consider this to be a good thing for my
country and its citizens. Capital punishment deters crime. Statistics prove consisted application of
the death penalty deter crime. No executed murdered has ever killed again. For many years,
Criminologists have thought to believe the death penalty has no affect as deterrence to homicides.
From 1972–1976, a suspension was place on capital punishment. The United States had 9,140
murders in 1960 where 56 people were executed. Nine years...show more content...
Abolitionists claim life in prison is a justifiable punishment for murder. They say it violates the
eighth amendment right which forbids "Cruel and Unusual Punishment". Let's examine the issue.
Our founding fathers have never clearly defined the eighth amendment. According to the Justice of
the Supreme Court, They say the death penalty is not cruel and/or unusual and is an acceptable
form of punishment. Capital Punishment is morally justified. A crime is only as severe as the
punishment that follows it. As Edward Koch wants said, "It is by exacting the highest penalty for
the taking of human life that we affirm the highest value of human life." Abolitionists use the bible
as a source of all morality and have taken many quotations from the bible out of context. One
example abolitionists use is Matthews 7:1 Jesus said, "Judge not, that you be not judged" to say the
death penalty contradicts Christian values. In order for us to sentence someone to death we have to
judge them. If you look at the whole picture, Jesus was saying
"Judge not, that you be judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with
the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. And why do you look at the speck in your
brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother,
'Let me remove the speck from your eye'; and look, a plank is in your own eye?

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty Essay
Should the death penalty be legal? This simple question sparks a lot of controversy and is the topic
of many debates. For countries like China and Saudi Arabia, they say yes. But, for the United States,
only about 62% of people agree. A number of execution methods have been used such as firing
squad, hanging, electrocution, and most recently, lethal injection. Both Dave Anderson and Robert
Blecker are supporters of the death penalty, but they both are not necessarily for the current
execution methods available. Nick Gillespie and Jeffrey Toobin are against the death penalty, stating
that it is not only immoral, but is expensive and violates the Eighth Amendment. While both sides of
this debate provide reasonable arguments, neither side contributes enough to win the debate. Since
1973, 144 people that were on death row have be executed. The supporters of the death penalty
believe that by executing "the worst of the worst" will decrease crime, provide substantial
punishments, and promote happiness and safety throughout the country. Supporters are trying to
find solutions to legalize the death penalty in the United States that is not considered cruel and
unusual punishment, while still providing justice for the victims and their families. "Most of the
arguments against the death penalty; those of inherent unfairness and bias towards the poor or racial
minorities or the devastating potential for mistaken execution are both fallacious and misleading"
(Anderson 2016). Dave

Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty
The death penalty is a form of punishment, which is given to a felon that has committed a major
crime and requires for the criminal to be sentenced to death. Capital punishment was a custom of the
government and society for thousands of years as a way to "justify" the crimes of felons and is
unfortunately is still present in communities around the world. The death penalty is frequently a form
of punishment in asian and middle eastern countries and still resides in parts of the USA also.
Capital punishment affects many lives including the very criminals who are sentenced to death. Not
only is the death penalty an immoral way to pay for a crime, but the very method is inhumane. Lethal
injection is the most popular form of execution in the...show more content...
This punishment is given as a consequence to a person who has committed a major felony and the
government feels that the only way to condone the crime is to pay the forfeit of his life. Capital
punishment is believed to act like a deterrence to criminals, but according to the US Census in 2006,
South Carolina, which inhabits the punishment is number one in violent crime rates, with 766
crimes per every 100,000 people, while the state of Maine that does not have the death penalty ranks
50th in all the states with an outstanding 116 violent crimes per every 100,000 population. In
addition, a recent study of the United States top criminologists proved that the death penalty does not
deter violent crimes. The study in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology states that 88% of
the US' most prestigious criminologist believed that the death penalty did not prevent homicide and
75% of the experts surveyed agreed that "debates about the death penalty distract Congress and state
legislatures from focusing on real solutions to crime problems". This demonstrates that despite the
death penalty, crimes are still present and not only does it remain to make an impact on these
felonies, it shows that the places without the penalty are much more prosperous with their crime

Essay on Death Penalty Pros and Cons
In this time of life, where things have changed to a better world, it still exist massacre, what it's
called death penalty. "United Stated is one of the six nations that commonly continue with this
dramatic scenario" (Human Rights).Debates and political issues have been put into effect to stop
this cruel and inhuman punishment. Since early years people have the belief of killing each other
to solve their problem; what's the idea of slaughter if pain would not be applicable? We should keep
them breathing to make them suffer the same way they cause the suffer ness of us or other people.
Its hard to see one of your family members get killed by one of this people, the first thing we want
is to see them get killed, but if you stop and...show more content...
People are not against the death penalty, they want to see people get killed for their mistakes;
(APW wrote: DP another way) "I am wondering if any of you who can support the death penalty,
would be willing to push the buttons, or inject the poison to commit murder? They are murderers,
and rapists and the like, so they kill. We are Children of God; we haven't the right to kill another
soul. That is in the hands of God alone. We have the responsibility to keep these people away from
others, and rehabilitate, if possible. That is all. Would any of you push that button?" It's hard to see
us pass the law of murder, why should we make the same mistake they did.
Many rapes, violations or other situation have been done by people that don't care of life of other
or their life, do you think if putting him into the death penalty he would care, it's only a quick pain,
they would not care if getting killed. Their many ways to solve this problem for example:
rehabilitation or solitary confinement, if you think about it this is worse than death. Death is quick;
solitary is for 1–80 years or more, with this as well, no contact with the outside. It's like a living
death in a world of pain and suffer ness, it would make them consider it twice before doing
something bad, just to think a life with nobody to talk, it would make them realize in what situation
they got into, it would set a good example to all the criminals. Violence

Essay on Pro-Death Penalty
Thousands of people will attack the death penalty. They will give emotional speeches about the one
innocent man or woman who might accidentally get an execution sentence. However, all of these
people are forgetting one crucial element. They are forgetting the thousands of victims who die
every year by the hands of heartless murderers. There are more murderers out there than people who
are wrongly convicted, and that is what we must remember.
I, as well as many others, have total confidence in the death penalty. It is a very beneficial
component of our justice system. The death penalty saves lives. It saves lives because it stops those
who murder from ever murdering again. It also deters potential murderers from ever committing the
crime....show more content...
Jaime, a beautiful twenty–year–old college student at SUNY Binghamton, had been walking back to
her dorm after class when she was abducted by Duffy at gunpoint. Wearing a black ski mask and
gloves, Jaime's friends were unable to identify him. Having no idea who this man was, they watched
in horror as Jaime was grabbed, threatened, and taken away.
Jaime was thrown into the front seat of a red Nissan Sentra with no license plates. Later that day, the
police located the vehicle, which had been reported stolen, but Jaime and her abductor where
nowhere to be found. There was not a single trace of evidence except for the fact that the car was
stolen from Jaime's hometown community.
Weeks went by and there were still no answers until the day two women, from Syracuse University,
were abducted at gunpoint, the same way that Jaime was. The police soon realized that the three
kidnappings had significant connections linking them together. These three women had all gone to
high school together. Not only did they go to the same high school, they had all dated the same man
at one point in time– Brian Duffy. It wasn't long before police tracked him down for questioning.
Brian Duffy was arrested in April of 1997 for the rape and murder of my cousin Jaime and the two

Pro Death Penalty Essay
One of the main contributing factors to support the abolishment of the death penalty is the risk of
executing innocent lives. Over 150 people in the past few years alone have been taken off death
row because they were eventually found innocent.() Whether one would like to believe it or not,
numerous executions have been carried out where years later the actual culprit responsible for a crime
were found and tried. No matter how current the legal system may be with DNA testing and its
technology, the system can occasionally fail. People are prone to make mistakes. This can
unfortunately lead to DNA being altered, with the possibility of being falsely documented into the
system. Investigative workers themselves can even tamper and plant false

Have you ever wondered what it's like to have your life be taken away by your own crime? Death
penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital
crime ("What is Death Penalty and Capital Punishment?"). Capital punishment is not a good way to
punish people and it should be removed everywhere in the U.S. To put in other words, death penalty
is a violation of the eighth amendment. The Constitution states, "excessive bail shall not be required,
nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted,"
("U.S.Const.Amend.VIII"). Over 120 years, there has been 276 botched executions, which means
that the execution went wrong in several ways, making the inmates suffer, ("Botched Executions").
Of the 276, there has been 75 botched lethal injections, the execution rate for botched inmates is
7.12% ("Botched Executions")....show more content...
Since 1976, more than 1,000 people have been executed innocently, and there is no way to tell if
they were innocent or not ("Executed but Possibly Innocent"). Once a prisoner is killed from death
penalty, nothing can be done to fix the mistakes that have been made ("Innocence"). "At least 121
people have been taken off the death row list, because of their innocence since 1973, and for every 8
executions, at least one person has been convicted for no reason.ВЁ (ВЁInnocenceВЁ) Also, death
penalty violates human rights. "The death penalty is a denial of the most basic human rights, it
violates one of the most fundamental principles under widely accepted human rights law, that states
must recognize the right to life." (ВЁDeath Penalty Information PackВЁ). Death penalty violates all
the rights to life, which is the most basic of all human rights, (ВЁWhy Death Penalty Should be
AbolishedВЁ). The U.S. is very guilty for death penalty, because they don't consider if it violates
human rights,

Pro-Death Penalty Essay example
There are a total of 3,350 inmates currently on death row. These people include all of the main
races in America. In 1965 Robert Massie murdered a mother of two in California during a
robbery. Mere hours before he was scheduled to be executed. A stay was issued so he could
testify, he had found evidence to support his cases and got parole and a second chance. Eight
months later he robbed and murdered a businessman in California. This is a obvious that the death
penalty should not be abolished, better yet supported in all states. The death penalty will prove to
all mentally unstable criminals the horrors of death and will force them to face it eye to eye if they
choose to commit the crime.
Capital punishment is active in 36 states. 10...show more content...
That is a resoundingly low number. That means that if a state declares a execution of the convict it
is most likely going to happen. ?The number of innocent people who have been executed have
been ZERO?(Elliot, David/Marquis, Joshua). There have also been speculation that if a massacre
happens then the convict does not deserve to die? Many have said this is stupid that if someone
does that he can be let off with a life sentence. Life sentence is always better than death, so he should
be executed.
The reason why people have been critical about the death penalty is that maybe the commonly
used three drug cocktail is a painful death. The cocktail consists of 3 drugs administered by a
needle, the first is meant to incapacitate you then paralyze your muscles then to finally stop the
heart. Many are saying this painful. How much more painless can it get. And do the convicts that
commit such a horrible crime deserve to be painlessly executed? In China the common execution
is one bullet to the back of the dead. In America that is unheard of and if anyone were to propose
such a thing they would be considered cruel and twisted. Some of have been exposed to the other
forms of executions used in America. One of them is electrocution which is solely used in
Nebraska. A story is that a man was to be executed in Florida and a officer noticed that the sponge
on the man?s head was torn so they got a new one but the new one was

Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in
the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary
since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell
you is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison
escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for two convicted murders who escaped
from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY
punishment from which one cannot escape is the death penalty.
Opponents of the death penalty believe capital punishment is unnecessary and inappropriate in our
modern...show more content...
A fifth rationale in opposition is that the death penalty is too expensive or too costly to taxpayers
to justify its use. According to those who oppose the death penalty and certain studies, it costs
more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for life (Death Penalty Focus, 2015).
Finally, it is believed by some that the killing at the hands of the state is not a righteous act but
instead is on the same moral level as the murderers themselves.
According to capital punishment supporters, many of these reasons of the anti–death penalty
movement are false and are now wrongly accepted as fact. The argument that the death penalty does
not deter crime is debatable. By executing murderers you prevent them from murdering again. If
these people no longer exist then they obviously cannot commit more crimes. In addition, criminals
have admitted, in thousands of fully documented cases, that the death penalty was the specific threat
which deterred them from committing murder (Pro–Death Penalty, 2014). The opponents of capital
punishment claim that the death penalty has caused and can cause the execution of innocent people.
However, according to the supporters, no evidence indicates that innocent people have been
executed. Upon reviewing 23 years of capital sentences, a Wall Street Journal study indicated that
they were unable to find a single case in which an innocent person was executed (Eddlem, 2002).
Furthermore, advocates note that the

Pro Death Penalty Pros
Did you know that the cost of the death penalty was about $184 million annually in California?
Now picture a lady casually walking down the street when someone runs up, shoots her, just for
the $20 in her wallet. But she's also a single mom with two children who now have no mother.
Now those kids will grow up without anyone to guide them but there foster parents. So now there
lives are forever changed and that murderer gets to live just because the government doesn't want
to pay for it. Body paragraph 1 If there was a death penalty it would probably keep more murderers
out of public then if there wasn't. Some would say that it wouldn't make a difference. They say this
because the percentages of when there was and when there wasn't a

Pro Death Penalty
Still today, the death penalty is a major controversy in numerous states all over the United States. It's
hard to grasp the idea of putting another human to death. The death penalty is an execution style
punishment which is usually used against criminal's who have committed a horrific crime. The are
many arguments that the death penalty goes against the eighth amendment, which was struck down
by the Supreme Court. I believe that the death penalty should be abolished everywhere in America. I
think it should be abolished because it still isn't proven to deterrent future murders, it's used unfairly,
and there is a risk of executing the innocent. The death penalty can be replaced with life in prison,
suffering in prison for the rest of their...show more content...
This is truly why life sentence in more effective in the end. After a criminal is sentenced it can
eventually leak out that that inmate is actually innocent. If we execute that inmate, we can't get his
life back once we find out he actually was found not guilty. If we sentence them to life, we can
release him when we find out the facts that he was not guilty the whole time. The courts can
technically face many consequences for this because they did not uncover all the evidence before
they executed the inmate. Once you take away a life there isn't any going back to fix it. There has
been countless errors in the court system that have resulted in innocent deaths. This can cause
families to lose their loved ones, or children to lose their parents when it could have been

Pro Death Penalty
If someone takes the life of another human being, is it worth taking their life too or let them rot in
a cell? One of the biggest arguments in the U.S. today deals with the death penalty on whether we
should get rid of it or keep it around. Being also know as capital punishment it is used in order to
keep people in line. The very first known use of capital punishment was back in Eighteenth Century
B.C., which assigned twenty five different crimes. The death penalty is characterized as a cruel
punishment by death penalty in states, pros of the death penalty, cons of the death penalty, and the
Constitution.
This is important because knowing how many states still have death penalty around shows it is still
the punishment, because if you murder

Pro Death Penalty Research Paper
Over the course of history, the death penalty is a very heated and debatable topic. The death
penalty is often viewed as inhumane and cruel. As a country that prides itself on American values
and justice, we need to call attention to the criminals sitting in our jails. This is a monumental
decision that no one wants to make, but someone has to. My personal stand point of the death
penalty is that the death penalty is in place to help rid our society of criminal's that are incapable of
being rehabilitated and released back into society. I support the death penalty because these
criminals have caused emotional upheaval and are costing our society more funds required to sit in
our jails with the life sentence with no parole rather than exercising...show more content...
The people that are against the death penalty have clearly stated that it is inhumane and cruel
referring to the eighth amendment, in the constitution. Even though these criminals are tried in
front of a judge and a jury of their peers, they are just supposed to sit in jail. The men and women
that are incarcerated are there for their crimes and actions. Many lives have been devastated
because of the actions of these criminals. The family of the criminal that is incarcerated has to live
with the guilt of what he/she has done. The families of the victims have to live with their pain and
loss as well. The drugs that inflict death upon the inmates are more costlier than habitation.
Pharmacies have refused to sell the inducing drugs because they do not want to associate themselves
with the killing of a person, innocent or guilty. There are a lot of inmates sitting in prison for life that
society thinks it is easier to house them than to purchase the necessary drugs to put them to sleep. At
the end of the day, the perpetrators are still human beings and need to be treated as such.
In conclusion, after much debate, the punishment should fit the crime. We as a society have
deliberated on the emotional aspect, of both sides and the funding for keeping these criminals alive
with no chance of parole. There will always be a new standpoint or opinion on the matter. But, we
must always try to make the right decision

Essay Pro Death Penalty
The death penalty is one of the topics people either fully agree with or are absolutely against it,
very few people are in between. I'm personally pro death penalty. There is pros and cons to this
topic, as well as everything else.
Nobody likes paying taxes, that's a fact, so why would you want to pay extra taxes? So that
mentally ill people that could have done unimaginably horrific things can live, be relatively happy,
have a free home and eat 3 meals a day? If a person does something so horrible that they get a life
sentence why not put them to death? It costs less to put the, to sleep than to keep them alive. I
believe that if you go against the rights to life (murder), freedom (enslaving) or safety of victims
(treason) you should be sentenced to death. If you think about it and put yourself in the victims
possition you would want the person to pay for his/her actions. The death penalty can also lower
crime rates, people aren't scared to go to prison/jail, but every single human has a fear of death. If
we put some convicted criminals on death row it'll put some sense into them....show more content...
One con to the death penalty in that an innocent person could be put on death row. It's a very
serious con, but there is a lot of good reasons that such a thing could happen. One reason could be
that the other person convicted has vanished and left nothing behind besides evidence pointing to
someone else. Another reason could be that the guilty perso has a very good lawyer. The final reason
could be because of color or race, stereotypically black males are more likely to commit felony
crimes like

The U.S. has five different forms of execution, hanging, lethal gas, electrocution, firing squad, and
lethal injection in which the government uses to kill those who have committed a serious crime.
This is known as the death penalty. This is a very expensive and useless system. All of these should
be illegal, because it puts innocent lives at risk, costs millions of dollars, and capital punishment does
not deter crime. Therefore this system should be abolished.
With the U.S. struggling with the economy, people are wondering and asking, is this the right way
to spend the country's money. Life is a stake with this system a one hundred percent of the time and
this takes more lawyers and time, which means it takes more time. The death penalty...show more
content...
144 people on death row have been exonerated since 1973. According to a study, one in 25 people
sentenced to death are innocent. Some people say that the man who is on death row is guilty, when
4.1 percent of those people are innocent.
Also, capital punishment does not deter crime. Many innocent people have died from this system
and it has to stop somewhere, why not now? It seems this is used to scare criminals and if that is
the case, then we are not doing a good job of it because crime is happening as we speak. Also, the
death penalty is a crime itself. Why are we killing those who have killed, because obviously no one
has learned their lesson. As they say, two wrongs don't make a right, and this is the perfect example
of that.
This evidence shows that the death penalty should be abolished because it puts innocent lives at
risk, costs millions of dollars, and capital punishment does not deter crime. It should be abolished
due to the fact that it is keeping America from spending this money we are wrongfully using on
something productive. This money could be spent on getting the water pipes fixed in Flint,
Michigan, or forces that caused the world economy to collapse. Let's make america great again.
This can be achieved by abolishing this

Persuasive Speech Pro Death Penalty
What is the death penalty? What is its purpose? Do you know anyone that has went through it?
Well first, I would like to say good afternoon. I will be speaking on the crucial subject of death
sentences. The death penalty has always been a topic of discussion for many centuries, and has been
given to people legally convicted of capital crime, typically murder. People in support of this act
believe that convicted murderers must face execution as a consequence for their actions. Others
against it believe that the penalty is nothing but legalized murdering and is immoral. The death
penalty has been widely used in the United States as I think the death penalty should be banned
because we pay millions for the death penalty system, it puts innocent lives at risk, and there's a
better option to consider which is life without parole.
The death penalty should be banned because, first, we pay millions for the death penalty system.
Oregonians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty organization stated, "Washington county murder
cases cost more than 1.5 million." Also the organization stated that, "It's estimated that the total
prosecution and defense costs to the state and countries equal 9 million per year." Another piece of
evidence stated that "the Oregon Judicial Department would save 2.3 million annually if the death
penalty were eliminated." This proves and gives an example of how the Washington county murder
cases in Oregon are costly, and the death penalty would even

Jonathan Lewin
Miss Woods
English 2 Honors – Period 6
22 February 2016
Benefits of the Death Penalty One of the most debated issues, whether capital punishment, also
known as the death penalty, should be banned or still be used, is still a widely disputed issue at the
heart of political debate. Many states recently have been abolishing capital punishment. Yet, as of
October 2014, support for capital punishment is still strong as three fifths of Americans continue to
back capital punishment. It is important that capital punishment is included as a punishment for all
violent criminals for it can be used as a deterrent, taxpayers have to pay less money to sustain
criminals, and an executed criminal is no longer a threat to society. States that are considering
abolishing capital punishment or have banned it already should look at the positives of capital
punishment and reconsider. The first reason to support capital punishment is that taxpayers will not
have to pay as much money to house, feed, and provide healthcare for violent criminals. "About 44
million people in this country have no health insurance, and another 38 million have inadequate
health insurance." (PBS) This is a shocking statistic as criminals in jail are provided with free
health care which over 25% of America still doesn't have. "For the average 632 prisoners in
maximum security prison, the cost was $62,730 each. For those in minimum security, the cost was
$47,679 per offender." (McGowan) The cost of

Pro Death Penalty Persuasive Speech

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Paper Writer Service

Mais de Paper Writer Service (20)

Último

Último (20)

Pro Death Penalty Persuasive Speech