O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

Chinese army and u.s. forces in training and capacity gap

396 visualizações

Publicada em

Chinese army and u.s. forces in training and capacity gap

  • Seja o primeiro a comentar

  • Seja a primeira pessoa a gostar disto

Chinese army and u.s. forces in training and capacity gap

  1. 1. Chinese Army and U.S. forces in training and capacity gapAll by : http://alley.burberryvivid.com/However, no mention of China, but when the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force heretoday asked a sailor if he plans to cut U.S. troops in Asia, the U.S. Defense Panetta knowwhat to ask the sailors in the end.Panetta replied: "I want it clear that the United States will continue long-term military in thePacific. In other words, as you understand, we do not consider reducing troops in theregion if there is any move, We are in the Pacific region to strengthen the garrison. "Panetta made the remarks in Indonesia on the day before mentioned, and certainly laterthis week visit to South Korea also say when.With the subsiding of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States eager to show itsstrength in Asia, this is the Obama administration issued a new call to make.The axis eastward, aimed at strengthening its Asian alliance against China that the UnitedStates away from the beach on the islands territorial claims. However, the timing is notgood.Like with other countries, Asian allies that the U.S. economic slump, will cut the Pentagonbudget, the White House and Republicans competing isolationist trend high.Just last week, presidential candidate Mitt Romney in a debate, a number of U.S. foreignaid actually should outsource to China.He said: "We Chinese people to borrow money, but to provide humanitarian assistance toanother country, this does not make much sense and we should let the Chinese people totake care of them.Pentagon officials say there is no plan to reduce troops in the Pacific, 85,000 U.S. troops,is not prepared to reduce the presence in the region seven aircraft carrier (the UnitedStates a total of 11 aircraft carriers).They believe that, in Chinas rapidly expanding its military capabilities on the occasion,even small-scale withdrawal of troops in the region will be regarded as symbolic of theretreat.http://almond.louisvuittonbargain.com/
  2. 2. http://alwyn.louisvuittondeluxe.com/In China, analysts said, the Communist Party for decades in the civil requirements of themilitary need to need, so basically to improve the PLAs modernization process to upgrade,but was delayed.Chinese militarys view is enhanced for the prevention of its arms in the Pacific that theUnited States continues to expand and may not be friendly troops is necessary.Research Center of Tsinghua University, China-US relations, Sun Zhe, said in aninterview late last year: "This is a serious threat, but also a potential threat."He cited the U.S. deployment in the region seven aircraft carriers and 18 submarines, forexample, said: "If you say they are just against the DPRK, who do not believe this."In the U.S., some people worry that Chinas military expansion in the use of the Pentagonto justify its purchase of expensive new weapons systems is correct, but worried that theU.S. ignored Beijings economic, diplomatic and trade pose a greater challenge.U.S. National Institute of Asia, a China expert Roy D · Camp Howson said: "If we are onlyconcerned with military modernization, we will ignore those challenges."After the first visit to Asia as Secretary of Defense of Panetta, for President Obama hostedthe APEC summit next month in Hawaii and attended the East Asia Summit held inIndonesia to prepare.As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this month in the "Foreign Policy" publishedbi-monthly "Americas Pacific Century," an article said, the U.S. government issued amessage, the voice of President Barack Obama will be the biggest: the next 10 years,United States needs in the region "significant increase diplomatic, economic, strategic andother inputs."On the military side, China is insufficient to constitute a positive challenge to the UnitedStates.Last year, Chinas military budget is estimated to total $ 160 billion since the 1990shas tripled.In contrast, the Pentagons 2010 military spending more than $ 500 billion if you count thewar in Iraq and Afghanistan, with nearly $ 700 billion.Although an estimated 1.25 million Peoples Liberation Army ground forces, is the worldslargest (active duty U.S. Army and Marine Corps troop of about 70 million people), but U.S.defense officials say the training and ability in a large gap.http://ambrose.louisvuittongear.com/
  3. 3. http://andee.louisvuittongrand.com/However, almost all of Chinas military expenditure spent in Asia, the U.S. military in Asiawith only part of it.U.S. defense officials said, because the Soviet Union learned the lessons of the Cold War,China is not in full competition with the United States, but in their dominant aspects of"asymmetric" competition. Result, China has developed anti-ship ballistic missiles, mayhave the ability to attack U.S. aircraft carrier in the Pacific.China is also developing a new generation of stealth fighter J-20, this year, whenthen-Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a high-profile visit to Beijing, they wereconspicuous in the first test flight.Thus, the Pentagon increased the number of weapons, aircraft and technologyinvestments, including the new long-range bombers capable of carrying nuclear weaponsand a new generation of naval electronic jamming aircraft.Pentagon strengthened cyber warfare capabilities, is developing a highly classified warstrategy in Asia, namely the concept of air and maritime warfare, to coordinate thedeployment of naval and air forces in the Pacific.http://angharad.louisvuittonlofty.com/