SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 44
Baixar para ler offline
Skynet
Increasing Situational Awareness
Through Computer VisionSOCOM
Week 10
Increase situational
awareness by
automatically detecting
humans on
autonomous drone
feeds
Week 0
Increase situational
awareness while
minimizing cognitive
load with a new
human-drone
interaction system
107
Interviews
Many Interviews Later…
Companies
8
Users
52
Experts
26
Buyers
14
The Skynet Team
Kevin Mott Alvin Goh Sam Gussman Olga Musayev
International Policy
Studies 2017
Mgmt Sci & Engr
2016
Symbolic Systems
2016
JD 2017
AD Infantry Officer
Embedded
Systems
Engineer
UI/UX Design
Software Engineer
Data Scientist and
Lawyer
The Problem
Don’t want to take Operator out of
the fight to watch a drone feed
NAVY SEALs Fighting
ISIS, 2016
The Journey
Sponsor
change
ATAK
Discovery
Technical
exploration
Found DARPA,
AFRL
31st
May
July
Demo
Mission Model Canvas V1- Week 0
SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas
- SOF, Rangers, AWG
- Law Enforcement
Agencies
- Drone manufacturers (ex:
DJI)
- Haptic startups
- Augmented Reality
Visualization Companies
(ex: Google Glass)
- Threat/Friendly detection
- using
light/sound/motion/indicat
or/marking
-HCI - feedback
mechanism
-Making system easy to
use/learn/maintain
- Primary: SOF elements
and Ground Force
Commanders
- Secondary: Command
elements at TOC/TAC
-Tertiary: Search and
Rescue teams
-Enhance situational
awareness - Drone
becomes another set of
eyes, frees up an operator.
-Reduced risk to force-
Drone goes so humans do
not have to
- video recording to
facilitate AARs in training
-Low cost alternative to
costly assets- frees up
other assets in a resource
constrained environment
- Reduces dependence on
human capital
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from
conventional units
- Field test with one unit.
Evaluate training method.
- Expand field-tests to
multiple units in same
deployment context
- With successful field
tests, contract COTS
vendors to mass produce.
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits,
- Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4)
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
- Drones w/ camera
(provided by SOCOM)
- Augmented Reality
Visualizer with developer
tools
- Haptic Specialists to act
as advisors
- Hapkit
- Drone pilots
- Soldiers / team leaders
-Need current methods
used to mark friendly
forces
-Support of an automated
threat detection system
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners Value
proposition:
Novel Human-
drone interface
to allow
operators to
control UAV
drones easier
Beneficiaries:
SOF elements,
Commanders,
Search &
Rescue
Key partners:
Law
enforcement
Augmented
Reality
Companies
Weeks 0-3 Customer Discovery
(Moffett field, Week 3)
Experiment: audio vs visual cues
What we did:
- Interviews, Moffett Field visit
- Cognitive Obstacle Course
- Gear Assessment
What we heard:
“I don’t want another system…”
What we thought:
Operators need a new way of
interacting with drones while
remaining alert on the
battlefield.
ATAK: Google Maps for DoD
Mission Model Canvas- Week 3
SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas
- SOF, Rangers, AWG
- Law Enforcement
Agencies
- Drone manufacturers (ex:
DJI)
- Haptic startups
- Augmented Reality
Visualization Companies
(ex: Google Glass)
- Threat/Friendly detection
- using
light/sound/motion/indicat
or/marking
-HCI - feedback
mechanism
-Making system easy to
use/learn/maintain
- Primary: SOF elements
and Ground Force
Commanders
- Secondary: Command
elements at TOC/TAC
-Tertiary: Search and
Rescue teams
-Enhance situational
awareness - Drone
becomes another set of
eyes, frees up an operator.
-Reduced risk to force-
Drone goes so humans do
not have to
- video recording to
facilitate AARs in training
-Low cost alternative to
costly assets- frees up
other assets in a resource
constrained environment
- Reduces dependence on
human capital
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from
conventional units
- Field test with one unit.
Evaluate training method.
- Expand field-tests to
multiple units in same
deployment context
- With successful field
tests, contract COTS
vendors to mass produce.
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits,
- Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4)
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
- Drones w/ camera
(provided by SOCOM)
- Augmented Reality
Visualizer with developer
tools
- Haptic Specialists to act
as advisors
- Hapkit
- Drone pilots
- Soldiers / team leaders
-Need current methods
used to mark friendly
forces
-Support of an automated
threat detection system
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key PartnersKey partners:
Law
enforcement
Augmented
Reality
Companies
??
Value
proposition:
Something that
isn’t another
new system
A way to spot
enemies
keep track of
each other
Beneficiaries:
SOF elements,
Commanders,
Search &
Rescue
Weeks 3-4
What We Heard:
“Object detection in drone feeds
would be huge.”
What we thought:
Operators need an extremely wide
range of capabilities- drone
swarms, facial recognition, etc.
- Knowing the locations of
friends/enemies/civilians
- Reduced ambiguity
- autonomous assessment of
aerial perspectives and video
feed Customer
Jobs
Shoot bad
guys without
getting shot
- Cognitive overload from
existing tools
-Manpower losses
- Hassle of systems not
communicating
Gains
Pains
Gain
Creators
Pain
Relievers
-Increased situational awareness on
the battlefield
- Reconnaissance of
inaccessible places
- Integrate with current
systems that soldiers are
familiar with
- Frees up another soldier
Products
& Services
Situationally aware
drone with visual
interface
Value Proposition Canvas
Pains
New system to
learn
Gains
Increase situation
awareness
Pains
Integrate with
ATAK
Gains
Detection
ClassificationProduct
ATAK
plugin
Customer
jobs
shoot bad guys
without getting
shot
Mission Model Canvas- Week 4
SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas
- SOF, Rangers, AWG
- Law Enforcement
Agencies
- Drone manufacturers (ex:
DJI)
- Haptic startups
- Augmented Reality
Visualization Companies
(ex: Google Glass)
- Threat/Friendly detection
- using
light/sound/motion/indicat
or/marking
-HCI - feedback
mechanism
-Making system easy to
use/learn/maintain
- Primary: SOF elements
and Ground Force
Commanders
- Secondary: Command
elements at TOC/TAC
-Tertiary: Search and
Rescue teams
-Enhance situational
awareness - Drone
becomes another set of
eyes, frees up an operator.
-Reduced risk to force-
Drone goes so humans do
not have to
- video recording to
facilitate AARs in training
-Low cost alternative to
costly assets- frees up
other assets in a resource
constrained environment
- Reduces dependence on
human capital
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from
conventional units
- Field test with one unit.
Evaluate training method.
- Expand field-tests to
multiple units in same
deployment context
- With successful field
tests, contract COTS
vendors to mass produce.
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits,
- Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4)
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
- Drones w/ camera
(provided by SOCOM)
- Augmented Reality
Visualizer with developer
tools
- Haptic Specialists to act
as advisors
- Hapkit
- Drone pilots
- Soldiers / team leaders
-Need current methods
used to mark friendly
forces
-Support of an automated
threat detection system
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key PartnersKey partners:
ATAK
programmers
Computer
vision experts
Value
proposition:
Detection
Classification
Integration with
ATAK
Beneficiaries:
SOCOM Green
Berets,
Rangers,
SEALs
JTACS, Drone
Operators
Weeks 5-6
What we thought:
Difficult/slow process to get
funding for development
Channels
What we heard:
“There’s lots of efficiencies in the
acquisition process.”
S&T, SBIR, BAAs, RRTO and CTTO
offices…
Field testing
Before
After
Deployment Timeline Comparison
SBIR
S&T
Existing
Contract
1 Year (6 months funding)
Funding
Expires
34 Months
(2 Years
funding)
Max 2 Years
(19 Months, 3 Weeks Funding)
6 121
102 34
2, +1 week 24
Mission Model Canvas-- Weeks 5-6
SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas
- SOF, Rangers, AWG
- Law Enforcement
Agencies
- Drone manufacturers (ex:
DJI)
- Haptic startups
- Augmented Reality
Visualization Companies
(ex: Google Glass)
- Threat/Friendly detection
- using
light/sound/motion/indicat
or/marking
-HCI - feedback
mechanism
-Making system easy to
use/learn/maintain
- Primary: SOF elements
and Ground Force
Commanders
- Secondary: Command
elements at TOC/TAC
-Tertiary: Search and
Rescue teams
-Enhance situational
awareness - Drone
becomes another set of
eyes, frees up an operator.
-Reduced risk to force-
Drone goes so humans do
not have to
- video recording to
facilitate AARs in training
-Low cost alternative to
costly assets- frees up
other assets in a resource
constrained environment
- Reduces dependence on
human capital
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from
conventional units
- Field test with one unit.
Evaluate training method.
- Expand field-tests to
multiple units in same
deployment context
- With successful field
tests, contract COTS
vendors to mass produce.
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits,
- Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4)
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
- Drones w/ camera
(provided by SOCOM)
- Augmented Reality
Visualizer with developer
tools
- Haptic Specialists to act
as advisors
- Hapkit
- Drone pilots
- Soldiers / team leaders
-Need current methods
used to mark friendly
forces
-Support of an automated
threat detection system
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners Beneficiaries:
Operators
Buyers (S&T,
acquisitions)
SOCOM
Channels
S&T SOCOM
SBIR SOCOM
or DoD
DARPA BAAs
Buy-In
Low-cost
Replaceable
COTS
What we thought:
Operators want to have
automatic detection AND
classification of humans in
video feed
What we did:
- Even more interviews!
- Explore current technology
(is classification feasible? At
what confidence levels?)
Weeks 7-9
Lesson:
Soldiers need to trust the UAV to make
accurate classifications.
Object Detection is a good starting point
Mission Achievement
Organization Beneficiary Mission Achievement
SOCOM Tactical operators - Human detection
- Location of humans detected
- Autonomous flight
PMs Get the right equipment to troops at a reasonable cost.
DARPA ATAK PM Get ATAK utilized in multiple military organizations, create a
plugin ecosystem to add value over time
TAK sUAS plugin team Fully implemented plugin features
DHS Border Patrol Improved identification and tracking of suspected illegal border
crossers.
Potential commercial
partners
Kespry/OceanIT/motionDSP Decreased R&D Costs, new revenue streams, relationships with
US Government customers. Improvements to existing technology
Skynet Team Skynet (Us) Awarded SBIR phase 1 & 2
OR
Transition to S&T acquisition process (via SOCOM) or corporate
Partners and Benefits
Computer Vision Experts (Stanford
Computer Vision Lab)
AFRL
J. (independent engineer)
DARPA
Activities Resources
Partners
People Recognition
Geolocation of person
ATAK Integration
Easy UI/UX
Pre-plan Routes
Autonomous Flight
Web Servers / Dataset Tagging,
Training Data,
Algorithm / Model
Camera Metadata (DJI API),
Drone Location data
ATAK Source Code,
ATAK Testing
User Feedback
Litchi,
Open Source Navigation Code,
Drones
Trained Deep Learning Model,
Drones
ATAK Team
- DARPA
- AFRL
SOCOM Operators
Litchi (?)
Open source drone software community
TBD
Mission Model Canvas- Week 7-9
SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas
- SOF, Rangers, AWG
- Law Enforcement
Agencies
- Drone manufacturers (ex:
DJI)
- Haptic startups
- Augmented Reality
Visualization Companies
(ex: Google Glass)
- Threat/Friendly detection
- using
light/sound/motion/indicat
or/marking
-HCI - feedback
mechanism
-Making system easy to
use/learn/maintain
- Primary: SOF elements
and Ground Force
Commanders
- Secondary: Command
elements at TOC/TAC
-Tertiary: Search and
Rescue teams
-Enhance situational
awareness - Drone
becomes another set of
eyes, frees up an operator.
-Reduced risk to force-
Drone goes so humans do
not have to
- video recording to
facilitate AARs in training
-Low cost alternative to
costly assets- frees up
other assets in a resource
constrained environment
- Reduces dependence on
human capital
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from
conventional units
- Field test with one unit.
Evaluate training method.
- Expand field-tests to
multiple units in same
deployment context
- With successful field
tests, contract COTS
vendors to mass produce.
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits,
- Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4)
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
- Drones w/ camera
(provided by SOCOM)
- Augmented Reality
Visualizer with developer
tools
- Haptic Specialists to act
as advisors
- Hapkit
- Drone pilots
- Soldiers / team leaders
-Need current methods
used to mark friendly
forces
-Support of an automated
threat detection system
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key PartnersPartners:
DARPA
AFRL
Computer
Vision Experts
SOCOM
Resources
Data,
algorithms
ATAK source
code
Drone
Key Activities
Computer
Vision
ATAK
Integration
Drone Hacking
Mission Achievement
Low-cost COTS drones that increase
situational awareness
Help DARPA start a program on drones
Week 9 MVP
“How am I supposed to feel vibration when I’m
running around being shot at when I can’t feel my
phone vibrate in my pocket walking to the
bathroom?”
“How does it know that someone is bad? I don’t
want to go to jail…”
“That’s badass”
“Can you demo this in July”
“I oddly feel more comfortable knowing there is a skynet
drone watching out for me”
Week 2 MVP
From this... ...to this
No Money
20192017 2018 2020 20212016
Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4
$500k
$1m
$5m
Product
Milestones
MVP
Businesses
Milestones
Beta 2.0 Release
Class ends
Demo
events
Apply SOCOM S&T, DARPA BAAs, SBIRs
SOCOM S&T Funding or DARPA BAA funding
1.0 Release
DIUx
Demo
events
Demo
events
Sell product to large DoD
contractor
Find other Agency S&T Funding
Try to become program of record
while sustaining individual sales
Apply Other Agency S&T Funding
Finance and Operations Timeline
Q1 Q2Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Who Helped us Get Here
Wayne Chen
Michael Hard
Brian CS
Jooyong Lee
Andrew Smallwood
Mentors:
Army Rangers, Green Berets, Navy SEALs, Air Force
Pararescuemen, and Norwegian SOF
Sponsor:
Tactical Operators:
Thanks Brendon!
Appendix
Appendix
Final mission model canvas
Pictures
Tech stack
Key partners, resources, activities
Progression of beneficiaries
Progression of value proposition
Acquisitions & deployment (timeline, get keep grow diagram, S&T process)
Hardware:
DIY custom drone kit
Camera (color / thermal)
Software:
Open-sourced firmware
Drone
ATAK Cursor On Target*
*Schema much like JSON
Androidplugin
Skynet
Computer Vision (openCV) Drone navigation
Object
detection
Object
recognition DJI sdk / open-sourced sdk
Android device
What we have now
What we learned
About the product
Refrain from building a new
system
Integrate with prefered existing
systems (ATAK)
COTS system - flexible, less
expensive
About the process
Get out of the building!
Distill the common pains and
gains
Understand the customer
Dig deep but look broad
Mission Model Canvas
-Software development
computer vision on drone
feeds
-People detection
-Geolocation of person
populated on map
-Integration with ATAK and
existing DoD tech
-Autonomous drone
hacking-not manufacturing
- Hack COT drone like DJI
- Partner with drone maker
- Become sensor neutral
DoD
- SOCOM: S&T and
acquisition PMs
- DARPA PMs
ATAK Integration
- ATAK Programmers in
DARPA and AFRL
Computer Vision
- Computer vision experts
- Increase situational
awareness through computer
vision, detection of people
and objects
- Provide low-cost method of
reconnaissance
-Easy UI and use through
integration w/ ATAK
-Added value to current
program/technology
-Provide demo to pitch new
program to Director of
DARPA
- Low-cost detection of
movement and people at
border
- Increase ability to respond
to sensors
- Fulfill S&T Topic of Interest requirements
- Establish and meet Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)
- Achieve 80% accuracy rate on detecting people, with few false positives
- Start new program for small UAVs in DARPA
- Fulfill technical wishlist for ATAK
- Improved identification and tracking of suspected illegal border crossers.
- Achieve sustainable business selling in S&T phase to multiple agencies
Q3, 2016 (May – June): $5,925 ($407 / Week)
Q4, 2016 (July – Sept): $16,847 ($1,296 / Week)
Q1, 2017 (Oct – Dec): $129,000 ($9,923 / Week)
Q2, 2017 (Jan – March): $249,600 ($19,200 / Week)
-Demonstrate utility + low-
cost- gain support from
senior personnel
-Add utility to current program
of record to increase adoption
-Start a company or get
acquired by another company
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Get awareness w/ demo
days, technical experiment.
conferences, etc.
-S&T UAV Topic of Area--
submit white paper
-Exchange expertise and
collaborate
-Talk with PMs, submit to
BAA-16-31
-Demo TE, TILO, and Ranger
training events in July
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Funding/Money, Access
ATAK Integration
-ATAK source code
-DJI SDK or open-source
Computer Vision
-Algorithms (CV lab)
- AMT / AWS
-Training data: blimp or
drone footage (AFRL)
Autonomous Drone (DJI)
Key Resources
Key Partners
SOCOM
- Tactical operators - SOF
(SF, Ranger, SEALS,
JSOC, MARSOC/Recon,
drone operators)
- SOCOM PMs- Small UAV
S&T PM, Acquisition PM,
DARPA
Tactical Technology
Office-SquadX and future
Small UAV program
ATAK Program Manager
AFRL
DHS
Border Patrol
Skynet
Because you asked for more color coding . . .
What we did
Customer Discovery
(Moffett field, Week 3)
ATAK MVP (Week 4)
Processing a drone video feed (Week 4/5)
ATAK mockup (Week 7)
Product planning (Week 8)
Week 9 MVP
What we did
The Journey
ATAK screen 1: Satellite imagery ATAK screen 2: Drone feed
The MVP Evolution
“How am I supposed to feel
vibration when I’m running
around being shot at when
I can’t feel my phone
vibrate in my pocket
walking to the bathroom?”
“I need to know without
a doubt that they’re
holding a gun and not a
baby”
“As far as
recognition,
that’s huge.”
“Are you sure it’s not
a baby? I really don’t
want to go to jail.”
V0.01 V0.1 Current
- Primary: SOF elements
and Ground Force
Commanders
- Secondary: Command
elements at TOC/TAC
-Tertiary: Search and
Rescue teams
Our Beneficiaries
COMBAT: SOF in a combat
environment (TIC)
--JTACs
--Team leader
NON-COMBAT: SOF in a
non-combat environment
DUAL USE: Search and
Rescue teams
COMBAT: SOF and Rangers
in a combat environment
(TIC)
--JTACs
--Team leader
NON-COMBAT: SOF in a
non-combat environment,
interacting and training with
allied troops
DUAL USE: Search and
Rescue teams
Tactical operators - SOF
(SF, Ranger, SEALS,
MARSOC/Recon, drone
operators)
Private sector and academic
partners (Neurala, drone
manufacturer, Stanford lab)
ATAK Program Manager
SOCOM Small UAV
S&T/Acquisition Program
Managers
Dual Use: Border Patrol
Week 0 Week 2 Week 3 Week 6
-Enhance situational
awareness - Drone becomes
another set of eyes, frees up
an operator.
-Reduced risk to force-
Drone goes so humans do
not have to
-Live video feed
-Low cost alternative to
costly assets- frees up other
assets in a resource
constrained environment
Minimize new load that
needs to be carried
- Reduces dependence on
human capital
Value proposition
COMBAT: Drone uses visual
recognition to separate
enemies, friendlies, and
noncombatants-- prevents
collateral damage and
fratricide
NON-COMBAT: Drone flies
route autonomously,
increases awareness of
surroundings, and could do
patrols
- Low cost alternative to
costly assets
Minimize new load that needs to be
carried
- Reduces human capital
needs-- frees up man to
fight
- Identify and locate hostile
and neutral actors
- Enhanced ability to
conduct real time recon (esp
at night).
- Enable extra soldier in fight
- Autonomously fly routes
and identify potential
trouble.
- Extending communications
(e.g. inter-unit, with allied
troops)
- Conduct perimeter
surveillance
- Gather intelligence on
nearby residents and
distinguish between regular
and irregular behavior of
civilians in close proximity to
military installations
- Keep track of friendly,
potential hostile and neutral
actors/equipment
automatically
- New contracts and revenue
streams
- Opportunities for tech
development
-Added value to current
program/technology
-Cost effective, agile and
quick method of filling
capability gaps
- Low-cost detection of
movement and people at
border
Week 0 Week 2 Week 3 Week 6
Week 9
SOCOM
- Tactical operators - SOF
(SF, Ranger, SEALS,
MARSOC/Recon, drone
operators)
- SOCOM PMs- Small UAV
S&T PM, Acquisition PM,
Kespry, OceanIT,
motionDSP, Stanford CV
lab, drone manufacturers
DARPA
Tactical Technology Office-
Persistent Air Support
Project
ATAK Program Manager
DHS
Border Patrol
Skynet
- Increase situational
awareness through computer
vision, recognition of people
and objects
- Provide low-cost method of
reconnaissance
-Easy UI and use through
integration w/ ATAK
- New contracts and revenue
streams through the DoD
- New use cases for product
- Reputation and awareness
-Added value to current
program/technology
- Low-cost detection of
movement and people at
border
- Increase ability to respond
to sensors
product - market fit
Value Proposition Beneficiaries
Get/Keep/Grow Diagram
Awareness
S&TorSBIR
acquisition
Joint
Programof
Record
Up-sell
Unbundling
Adoptionby
otherAgencies
Keep Customers
S&T Process - Prototype to Product
BAA for
existing gap
White
Paper
White
Paper
White
Paper
S&T PM
(TBD)
S&T PM’s Group of
Operators
Other operators
who talk to
operators in PM’s
group
Bureaucracy line
Other operators
who talk to
operators in PM’s
group
S&T “Council”:
S&T PMs +
Director
Engineer
Proposal
Contract Negotiations
between business
and PM: Statement of
Work (COW);
Contracts Data
Requirements List
(CDROLS)
Step 1: find gap on
fedbizops + submit
whitepaper
Step 2: All whitepapers get
evaluated by operators
and engineer
Step 3: S&T PM brings selected
white paper to “council” of PMs.
They choose which projects to
prioritize and fund.
Step 4+5: Submit proposal
and negotiate deliverables
(CDROLS) and what you
will do (COW)
Step 0: “Free flowing” communication with operators
and PM to show off product and get selected and
prioritized
Mission Model Canvas- Week 1
- Threat / Friendly detection
using light / sound / motion /
indicator / or marking
-HCI - feedback mechanism
Haptic = bad
familiar = really important
-Making system easy to
use/learn/maintain
- SOF, Rangers, AWG
- Law Enforcement Agencies
- Drone manufacturers (ex:
DJI)
- Haptic startups
- Augmented Reality
Visualization Companies (ex:
Google Glass)
- Primary: SOF elements
and Ground Force
Commanders
- Secondary: Command
elements at TOC/TAC
-Tertiary: Search and
Rescue teams
-Enhance situational
awareness - Drone becomes
another set of eyes, frees up
an operator.
-Reduced risk to force-
Drone goes so humans do
not have to
- video recording to facilitate
AARs in training Live video
feed
-Low cost alternative to
costly assets- frees up other
assets in a resource
constrained environment
Minimize new load that
needs to be carried
- Reduces dependence on
human capital
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from conventional
units
- Field test with one unit.
Evaluate training method.
- Expand field-tests to
multiple units in same
deployment context
- With successful field tests,
contract COTS vendors to
mass produce.
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits,
- Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4)
- Software design & engineering
- Augmented reality hardware & software (equivalent of Google Glasses and
relevant developer toolkits)
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
-Need current methods used to mark
friendly forces
- Rank and file soldiers, unit
leaders, and commanders.
- Support of an automated
threat detection system
- Military engineers to
facilitate integration with
systems
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
- Drones w/ camera
(provided by SOCOM)
- Augmented Reality
Visualizer with developer
tools
- Access to existing gear and
standard equipment
- Haptic Specialists to act as advisors
- Hapkit
- Drone pilots
- Soldiers / team leaders
Mission Model Canvas- Week 2
- Threat/friendly/noncombat.
detection using visual
recognition light/sound/
motion/indicator/or marking
-HCI - feedback mechanism
-Making system easy to
use/learn/maintain
- Integration with prefered
sit. awareness platforms,
including smart phones (As a
Service)
- SOF, Rangers, AWG
- Law Enforcement Agencies
- Drone manufacturers (ex:
DJI)
- Sparrow (Stanford CS210
Autonomous Drone project)
- Haptic startups
- Augmented Reality
Visualization Companies (ex:
Google Glass)
-DARPA
COMBAT: SOF in a combat
environment (TIC)
--JTACs
--Team leader
NON-COMBAT: SOF in a
non-combat environment
DUAL USE: Search and
Rescue teams
COMBAT: Drone uses visual
recognition to separate
enemies, friendlies, and
noncombatants-- prevents
collateral damage and
fratricide
NON-COMBAT: Drone flies
route autonomously,
increases awareness of
surroundings, and could do
patrols
- Low cost alternative to
costly assets
Minimize new load that needs to be
carried
- Reduces human capital
needs-- frees up man to fight
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-perform manpower intensive tasks in non-combat roles
-Reduce fratricide and collateral damage
- Identify program manager
- Secure funding + contract
from sponsor
- Field test small-scale
- Contract a manufacturer for
large scale production
- Deploy iteratively, for each
integrate with a new system
- Continue relationship via
maintenance + integration
service
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits,
- Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4)
- Software design & engineering
- Augmented reality hardware & software (equivalent of Google Glasses and
relevant developer toolkits)
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
-Need current methods used to mark
friendly forces
- Rank and file soldiers, unit leaders,
and commanders.
- Support of an automated threat
detection system
- Military engineers to facilitate
integration with systems
??????
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
- Drones w/ camera
(provided by SOCOM)
- Augmented Reality
Visualizer with developer
tools
- Access to existing gear and
standard equipment
- Haptic Specialists to act as advisors
- Hapkit
- Drone pilots
- Soldiers / team leaders
Mission Model Canvas- Week 3
- Combatant classification
and threat detection
- Integration with ATAK &
other military systems
- Operable without GPS
- SOF, Rangers, AWG
- Law Enforcement Agencies
- Autonomous Drone
manufacturer (eg: Kespry)
- ATAK Design group
- Sparrow (Stanford CS210
Autonomous Drone project)
- Augmented Reality
Visualization Companies (ex:
Osterhout Design Group)
-DARPA
COMBAT: SOF and Rangers
in a combat environment
(TIC)
--JTACs
--Team leader
NON-COMBAT: SOF in a
non-combat environment,
interacting and training with
allied troops
DUAL USE: Search and
Rescue teams
- Identify and locate hostile
and neutral actors
- Enhanced ability to conduct
real time recon (esp at night).
- Enable extra soldier in fight
- Autonomously fly routes
and identify potential trouble.
- Extending communications
(e.g. inter-unit, with allied
troops)
- Conduct perimeter
surveillance
- Gather intelligence on
nearby residents and
distinguish between regular
and irregular behavior of
civilians in close proximity to
military installations
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-perform manpower intensive tasks in non-combat roles
-Reduce fratricide and collateral damage
- Secure funding + contract
- Small-scale testing
- Contract a manufacturer for
large scale production
- Deploy iteratively, integrate
with a new systems and
provide lessons on use
- Continue relationship via
maintenance, integration
service, and training
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits,
- Software design & engineering
- Augmented reality hardware & software (equivalent of Google Glasses and
relevant developer toolkits)
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
25k - relatively quick to
acquire
-for entirely new technology,
writeup to SOCOM
Saboteur - competition with
other groups
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
- DJI Drones w/ Dev. tools
- AR Device w/ Dev. tools
- ATAK API
- Access to existing gear and
standard equipment
Mission Model Canvas- Week 4
- Identifying and tracking
friendlies
- Object detection
- Object recognition,
classification and threat
detection
- Integration with ATAK
- SOF (green beret, ranger,
SEALS)
- SOCOM
- Programmable drone
manufacturers (eg: Solo)
- ATAK Program
- Neurala (or other computer
vision firm)
Tactical operators - SOF
(SF, Ranger, SEALS,
MARSOC/Recon, drone
operators)
Private sector partners
(Neurala, drone
manufacturer)
ATAK Program Manager
SOCOM Small UAV
S&T/Acquisition Program
Managers
- Keep track of friendly,
potential hostile and neutral
actors/equipment
automatically
- New contracts and revenue
stream
- Opportunities for tech
development
-Added value to current
program/technology
-Cost effective, agile and
quick method of filling
capability gaps
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-reduce workload for tactical operators and feed-monitoring operators
-decrease strain on other traditional aerial assets
-Deploy to select teams
under $25k level. Hardware
purchased COTS
-Incorporate commercial
partner software in app dev
-Work with ATAK to include
future app update with our
capabilities
-Work to make program of
record after buy in
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
-Demonstrate utility- gain
support from senior personnel
-Show opportunities for new
revenue streams
-Add utility to current program
of record to increase adoption
-Provide low cost product
with new capability filling gap
Saboteur - competition within
SOCOM PMs
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
- DJI phantom 3
programmable drone
- Computer vision SDK
(preferably neurala)
- ATAK API + source code
Mission Model Canvas- Week 5
- Fly autonomously on route
- Object detection,
recognition, classification
- Identifying and tracking
friendlies, enemies, civilians
- Integration with ATAK
- SOF (green beret, ranger,
SEALS)
- SOCOM, RRTO, CTTSO,
JCTD, CTO
- Programmable drone
manufacturers (eg: Solo)
- ATAK Program
- Neurala (or other computer
vision firm)
-Stanford Computer Vision
Lab
Tactical operators - SOF
(SF, Ranger, SEALS,
MARSOC/Recon, drone
operators)
Private sector and academic
partners (Neurala, drone
manufacturer, Stanford lab)
ATAK Program Manager
SOCOM Small UAV
S&T/Acquisition Program
Managers
Dual Use: Border Patrol
- Keep track of friendly,
potential hostile and neutral
actors/equipment
automatically
- New contracts and revenue
streams
- Opportunities for tech
development
-Added value to current
program/technology
-Cost effective, agile and
quick method of filling
capability gaps
- Low-cost detection of
movement and people at
border
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-reduce workload for tactical operators and feed-monitoring operators
-decrease strain on other traditional aerial assets
Options:
1). S&T Process
2). SBIR Process
3). Find existing contract
(short term funding)
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
-Demonstrate utility- gain
support from senior personnel
-Show opportunities for new
revenue streams
-Add utility to current program
of record to increase adoption
-Provide low cost product
with new capability filling gap
Saboteur - competition within
SOCOM PMs
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
- Programmable Drone
- Computer vision SDK
(preferably neurala)
- ATAK API + source code
__= New
Mission Model Canvas- Week 6
- Fly autonomously on route
- Object detection,
recognition, classification
- Identifying and tracking
friendlies, enemies, civilians
- Integration with ATAK
- SOF (green beret, ranger,
SEALS)
- SOCOM, RRTO, CTTSO,
JCTD, CTO
- Programmable drone
manufacturers (eg: Solo)
- ATAK Program
- Neurala (or other computer
vision firm)
-Kespry
-Stanford Computer Vision
Lab
Tactical operators - SOF
(SF, Ranger, SEALS,
MARSOC/Recon, drone
operators)
Private sector and academic
partners (Neurala, drone
manufacturer, Stanford lab)
ATAK Program Manager
SOCOM Small UAV
S&T/Acquisition Program
Managers
Dual Use: Border Patrol
- Keep track of friendly,
potential hostile and neutral
actors/equipment
automatically
- New contracts and revenue
streams
- Opportunities for tech
development
-Added value to current
program/technology
-Cost effective, agile and
quick method of filling
capability gaps
- Low-cost detection of
movement and people at
border
-Improved situational awareness for small units in combat
-reduce workload for tactical operators and feed-monitoring operators
-decrease strain on other traditional aerial assets
Demo days, technical
experimentation
conferences, etc.
S&T or SBIR Process,
depending on level of
prototype
“How to” youtube videos,
customer support
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
-Demonstrate utility- gain
support from senior personnel
-Show opportunities for new
revenue streams
-Add utility to current program
of record to increase adoption
-Provide low cost product
with new capability filling gap
Saboteur - competition within
SOCOM PMs
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
- Programmable Drone
- Computer vision SDK
- ATAK API + source code
__= New
Mission Model Canvas- Week 7
- Fly autonomously on route
Phase 1: Computer vision:
recognize people, vehicles
- Integration with ATAK
Phase 2: Computer vision:
classify people into
friendlies, enemies, civilians
- Stand alone from ATAK
- Augmented Reality
- SOF (green beret, ranger,
SEALS)
- SOCOM, RRTO, CTTSO,
JCTD, CTO
- ATAK Program
-Kespry, OceanIT,
motionDSP
-Stanford Computer Vision
Lab
- Programmable drone
manufacturers (eg: Solo)
-DARPA
- Increase situational
awareness of potential
threats and collateral
damage
- Provide low-cost method of
reconnaissance
- New contracts and revenue
streams
- Opportunities for tech
development
-Added value to current
program/technology
- Low-cost detection of
movement and people at
border
- Increase ability to respond
to sensors
- A job, money
- Fulfill S&T Topic of Interest requirements
- Establish and meet Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)
- Discover what’s possible under SBIR OSD-162-003X
- Achieve 80% accuracy rate on detecting people, with few false positives
- Fulfill the DARPA wish list of technical features
- Improved identification and tracking of suspected illegal border crossers.
Get awareness w/ demo
days, technical experiment.
conferences, etc.
-S&T UAV Topic of Area--
submit white paper
-SBIR Phase 1 Grant
“How to” youtube videos,
customer support
-Exchange expertise and
collaborate
Fixed:
- Equipment - drones, development toolkits
- Software design & engineering
Variable:
- Costs of maintenance, updates, and training
-Demonstrate utility + low-
cost- gain support from
senior personnel
-Show opportunities for new
revenue streams
-Add utility to current program
of record to increase adoption
-Start a company or get
acquired by another company
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
- Programmable Drone
- Computer vision SDK
- ATAK API + source code
__= New
SOCOM
- Tactical operators - SOF
(SF, Ranger, SEALS,
MARSOC/Recon, drone
operators)
- SOCOM PMs- Small UAV
S&T PM, Acquisition PM,
Kespry, OceanIT,
motionDSP, Stanford CV
lab, drone manufacturers
DARPA
Tactical Technology Office-
Persistent Air Support
Project
ATAK Program Manager
DHS
Border Patrol
Skynet
Skynet Origins
Original Problem Statement: Traditional UAV video platforms require a tactical operator to control the UAV and
watch the video, which takes them out of the fight and has a high cognitive load. Our goal is to develop an -
autonomous drone that flies routes autonomously and gives reliable threat information without forcing an
operator to take his hands off the trigger or eyes off the scope.
Our Initial Idea: Since the root of the problem is cognitive overload, which stems from poorly designed UI and UX
systems, we aimed to create an improved Human-Drone Interaction system that could be scaled across
platforms.
90 In Person interviews (30 people surveyed)
Our product would target the Small Unmanned Aerial System (SUAS) market
TAM SAM (SUAS)
SOCOM 3,000 units 800-1000 units
DOD 18,210 units 17,296 units
Mission Model Canvas- Week 8
-Software development
computer vision on drone
feeds
-People recognition
-Geolocation of person
populated on map
-Integration with existing
DoD tech
-Autonomous drone
hacking-not manufacturing
- Hack COT drone like DJI
- Partner with drone maker
- Become sensor neutral
Funding from DoD
- SOCOM
- S&T and acquisition PMs
- Contracting PMs
Computer Vision
- Amazon--AWS
- Movidius
-MotionDSP, OceanIT
-Stanford CV Lab
-Independent computer
vision experts/contractors?
ATAK Integration
- ATAK Programmers
- DARPA
- “JL” for geolocation
Autonomous Drones
-DJI
-Kespry
- Programmable drone
manufacturers (eg: Solo)
- Increase situational
awareness through computer
vision, recognition of people
and objects
- Provide low-cost method of
reconnaissance
-Easy UI and use through
integration w/ ATAK
- New contracts and revenue
streams through the DoD
- New use cases for product
- Reputation and awareness
-Added value to current
program/technology
- Low-cost detection of
movement and people at
border
- Increase ability to respond
to sensors
- Fulfill S&T Topic of Interest requirements
- Establish and meet Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)
- Discover what’s possible under SBIR OSD-162-003X
- Achieve 80% accuracy rate on detecting people, with few false positives
- Find long-term customers in DoD
- Fulfill the DARPA wish list of technical features
- Improved identification and tracking of suspected illegal border crossers.
Get awareness w/ demo
days, technical experiment.
conferences, etc.
-S&T UAV Topic of Area--
submit white paper
-SBIR Phase 1 Grant
“How to” youtube videos,
customer support
-Commercial partnership
-Exchange expertise and
collaborate
Computer Vision
- Computer Vision expert: over $100 per hour
-MotionDSP- free
- Data- ??
ATAK- free
Drones- $1k and up
Other- costs of maintenance, updates, and training
-Demonstrate utility + low-
cost- gain support from
senior personnel
-Show opportunities for new
revenue streams
-Add utility to current program
of record to increase adoption
-Start a company or get
acquired by another company
Beneficiaries
Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs
Buy-In/Support
Deployment
Value PropositionKey Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Funding/Money
Computer Vision
-Computing power
-Algorithms
-Training data: blimp or
drone footage
ATAK Integration
-ATAK source code
-DJI SDK or open-source
Autonomous Drone
__= New
SOCOM
- Tactical operators - SOF
(SF, Ranger, SEALS,
MARSOC/Recon, drone
operators)
- SOCOM PMs- Small UAV
S&T PM, Acquisition PM,
Kespry, OceanIT,
motionDSP, Stanford CV
lab, drone manufacturers
DARPA
Tactical Technology Office-
Persistent Air Support
Project
ATAK Program Manager
DHS
Border Patrol
Skynet

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Recommender systems for E-commerce
Recommender systems for E-commerceRecommender systems for E-commerce
Recommender systems for E-commerceAlexander Konduforov
 
Digital Marketing Strategy for a Cosmetic Brand - Love Beauty and Planet (A U...
Digital Marketing Strategy for a Cosmetic Brand - Love Beauty and Planet (A U...Digital Marketing Strategy for a Cosmetic Brand - Love Beauty and Planet (A U...
Digital Marketing Strategy for a Cosmetic Brand - Love Beauty and Planet (A U...Abhishek Sinha
 
ProdSec: A Technical Approach
ProdSec: A Technical ApproachProdSec: A Technical Approach
ProdSec: A Technical ApproachJeremy Brown
 
The Power of a Proper North Star Metric
The Power of a Proper North Star MetricThe Power of a Proper North Star Metric
The Power of a Proper North Star MetricRocketSource
 
Shopper Marketing Methodology & Toolkit
Shopper Marketing Methodology & ToolkitShopper Marketing Methodology & Toolkit
Shopper Marketing Methodology & ToolkitDemand Metric
 
Lean LaunchPad: Analytics Workshop
Lean LaunchPad: Analytics WorkshopLean LaunchPad: Analytics Workshop
Lean LaunchPad: Analytics WorkshopStanford University
 
Recommendation system (1).pptx
Recommendation system (1).pptxRecommendation system (1).pptx
Recommendation system (1).pptxprathammishra28
 
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...Keith Jones, PhD
 
Uber Social Media Strategy- Taylor Torok
Uber Social Media Strategy- Taylor TorokUber Social Media Strategy- Taylor Torok
Uber Social Media Strategy- Taylor TorokTaylor Torok
 

Mais procurados (11)

Recommender systems for E-commerce
Recommender systems for E-commerceRecommender systems for E-commerce
Recommender systems for E-commerce
 
Digital Marketing Strategy for a Cosmetic Brand - Love Beauty and Planet (A U...
Digital Marketing Strategy for a Cosmetic Brand - Love Beauty and Planet (A U...Digital Marketing Strategy for a Cosmetic Brand - Love Beauty and Planet (A U...
Digital Marketing Strategy for a Cosmetic Brand - Love Beauty and Planet (A U...
 
ProdSec: A Technical Approach
ProdSec: A Technical ApproachProdSec: A Technical Approach
ProdSec: A Technical Approach
 
The Power of a Proper North Star Metric
The Power of a Proper North Star MetricThe Power of a Proper North Star Metric
The Power of a Proper North Star Metric
 
Customer Segmentation
Customer SegmentationCustomer Segmentation
Customer Segmentation
 
Shopper Marketing Methodology & Toolkit
Shopper Marketing Methodology & ToolkitShopper Marketing Methodology & Toolkit
Shopper Marketing Methodology & Toolkit
 
Lean LaunchPad: Analytics Workshop
Lean LaunchPad: Analytics WorkshopLean LaunchPad: Analytics Workshop
Lean LaunchPad: Analytics Workshop
 
Recommendation system (1).pptx
Recommendation system (1).pptxRecommendation system (1).pptx
Recommendation system (1).pptx
 
Sea++ H4D Stanford 2018
Sea++ H4D Stanford 2018Sea++ H4D Stanford 2018
Sea++ H4D Stanford 2018
 
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...
 
Uber Social Media Strategy- Taylor Torok
Uber Social Media Strategy- Taylor TorokUber Social Media Strategy- Taylor Torok
Uber Social Media Strategy- Taylor Torok
 

Destaque

Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Cloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
Cloudslate Berkeley Final PresentationCloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
Cloudslate Berkeley Final PresentationStanford University
 
Givemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
Givemodo Berkeley Final PresentationGivemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
Givemodo Berkeley Final PresentationStanford University
 
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Transcence Berkeley Final Presentation
Transcence Berkeley Final PresentationTranscence Berkeley Final Presentation
Transcence Berkeley Final PresentationStanford University
 
Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016 Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016 Stanford University
 
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4Stanford University
 
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Farm sense e245 march 2014 final
Farm sense e245 march 2014 finalFarm sense e245 march 2014 final
Farm sense e245 march 2014 finalStanford University
 
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Stanford University
 
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Stanford University
 

Destaque (20)

Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Cloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
Cloudslate Berkeley Final PresentationCloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
Cloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
 
Givemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
Givemodo Berkeley Final PresentationGivemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
Givemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
 
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Transcence Berkeley Final Presentation
Transcence Berkeley Final PresentationTranscence Berkeley Final Presentation
Transcence Berkeley Final Presentation
 
Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016 Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Omg e245 march 2014 final
Omg e245 march 2014 finalOmg e245 march 2014 final
Omg e245 march 2014 final
 
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
 
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Pesticide id Final Presentation
Pesticide id Final PresentationPesticide id Final Presentation
Pesticide id Final Presentation
 
Farm sense e245 march 2014 final
Farm sense e245 march 2014 finalFarm sense e245 march 2014 final
Farm sense e245 march 2014 final
 
HomeSlice Berkeley 2016
HomeSlice Berkeley 2016HomeSlice Berkeley 2016
HomeSlice Berkeley 2016
 
Exit strategy Berkeley 2016
Exit strategy Berkeley 2016Exit strategy Berkeley 2016
Exit strategy Berkeley 2016
 
SalesStash Berkeley 2016
SalesStash Berkeley 2016SalesStash Berkeley 2016
SalesStash Berkeley 2016
 
Delphi Berkeley 2016
Delphi Berkeley 2016Delphi Berkeley 2016
Delphi Berkeley 2016
 
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
 
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
 

Semelhante a Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016

Guardian Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016Guardian Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Guardian Lessons Learned Final
Guardian Lessons Learned FinalGuardian Lessons Learned Final
Guardian Lessons Learned FinalH4Diadmin
 
Guardian Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016Guardian Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Narrative Mind Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016Narrative Mind Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
UberCloud HPC Experiment Introduction for Beginners
UberCloud HPC Experiment Introduction for BeginnersUberCloud HPC Experiment Introduction for Beginners
UberCloud HPC Experiment Introduction for Beginnershpcexperiment
 
Event-Handling Based Smart Video Surveillance System
Event-Handling Based Smart Video Surveillance SystemEvent-Handling Based Smart Video Surveillance System
Event-Handling Based Smart Video Surveillance SystemCSCJournals
 
Technology Threat Prediction
Technology Threat PredictionTechnology Threat Prediction
Technology Threat PredictionH4Diadmin
 
AgileTech Vietnam portfolio
AgileTech Vietnam portfolioAgileTech Vietnam portfolio
AgileTech Vietnam portfolioVu Tra My (Kate)
 
Robotics and agents
Robotics and agentsRobotics and agents
Robotics and agentsritahani
 
Sentinel Lessons Learned
Sentinel Lessons LearnedSentinel Lessons Learned
Sentinel Lessons LearnedH4Diadmin
 

Semelhante a Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016 (20)

Skynet Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016Skynet Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Skynet Week 5 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 5 H4D Stanford 2016Skynet Week 5 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 5 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Skynet Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016Skynet Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Skynet Week 4 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 4 H4D Stanford 2016Skynet Week 4 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 4 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Skynet Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016Skynet Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Guardian Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016Guardian Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Guardian Lessons Learned Final
Guardian Lessons Learned FinalGuardian Lessons Learned Final
Guardian Lessons Learned Final
 
SRD Presentation
SRD PresentationSRD Presentation
SRD Presentation
 
Guardian Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016Guardian Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Skynet Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016Skynet Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Android_ver_01
Android_ver_01Android_ver_01
Android_ver_01
 
Narrative Mind Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016Narrative Mind Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Week 9 H4D Stanford 2016
 
UberCloud HPC Experiment Introduction for Beginners
UberCloud HPC Experiment Introduction for BeginnersUberCloud HPC Experiment Introduction for Beginners
UberCloud HPC Experiment Introduction for Beginners
 
Event-Handling Based Smart Video Surveillance System
Event-Handling Based Smart Video Surveillance SystemEvent-Handling Based Smart Video Surveillance System
Event-Handling Based Smart Video Surveillance System
 
Technology Threat Prediction
Technology Threat PredictionTechnology Threat Prediction
Technology Threat Prediction
 
AgileTech Vietnam portfolio
AgileTech Vietnam portfolioAgileTech Vietnam portfolio
AgileTech Vietnam portfolio
 
Robotics and agents
Robotics and agentsRobotics and agents
Robotics and agents
 
icuWorkbench - Use cases
icuWorkbench - Use casesicuWorkbench - Use cases
icuWorkbench - Use cases
 
Sentinel Lessons Learned
Sentinel Lessons LearnedSentinel Lessons Learned
Sentinel Lessons Learned
 
yogesh CV
yogesh CVyogesh CV
yogesh CV
 

Mais de Stanford University

Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Networks  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Networks  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team LiOn Batteries  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam LiOn Batteries  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Quantum  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Quantum  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Disinformation  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Disinformation  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Wargames  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Wargames  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Acquistion  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Team Acquistion  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Stanford University
 
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Stanford University
 
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedAltuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedStanford University
 
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedInvisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedStanford University
 
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learnedānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedStanford University
 
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef Stanford University
 
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Stanford University
 
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Stanford University
 
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...Stanford University
 
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - CyberLecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - CyberStanford University
 

Mais de Stanford University (20)

Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Networks  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Networks  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team LiOn Batteries  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam LiOn Batteries  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Quantum  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Quantum  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Disinformation  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Disinformation  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Wargames  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Wargames  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Acquistion  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Team Acquistion  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedAltuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
 
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedInvisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
 
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learnedānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
 
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
 
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
 
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
 
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
 
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - CyberLecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
 

Último

31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...HetalPathak10
 
Employablity presentation and Future Career Plan.pptx
Employablity presentation and Future Career Plan.pptxEmployablity presentation and Future Career Plan.pptx
Employablity presentation and Future Career Plan.pptxryandux83rd
 
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptxmary850239
 
Indexing Structures in Database Management system.pdf
Indexing Structures in Database Management system.pdfIndexing Structures in Database Management system.pdf
Indexing Structures in Database Management system.pdfChristalin Nelson
 
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWMythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxMan or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxDhatriParmar
 
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptxObjectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptxMadhavi Dharankar
 
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptxmary850239
 
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenshipThe role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenshipKarl Donert
 
6 ways Samsung’s Interactive Display powered by Android changes the classroom
6 ways Samsung’s Interactive Display powered by Android changes the classroom6 ways Samsung’s Interactive Display powered by Android changes the classroom
6 ways Samsung’s Interactive Display powered by Android changes the classroomSamsung Business USA
 
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdfDBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdfChristalin Nelson
 
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptxComparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptxAvaniJani1
 
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDecoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDhatriParmar
 
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxGrade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxkarenfajardo43
 

Último (20)

31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
 
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical VariableChi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
 
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Professionprashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
 
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
 
Employablity presentation and Future Career Plan.pptx
Employablity presentation and Future Career Plan.pptxEmployablity presentation and Future Career Plan.pptx
Employablity presentation and Future Career Plan.pptx
 
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
 
Indexing Structures in Database Management system.pdf
Indexing Structures in Database Management system.pdfIndexing Structures in Database Management system.pdf
Indexing Structures in Database Management system.pdf
 
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWMythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxMan or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
 
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptxObjectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
 
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
 
Plagiarism,forms,understand about plagiarism,avoid plagiarism,key significanc...
Plagiarism,forms,understand about plagiarism,avoid plagiarism,key significanc...Plagiarism,forms,understand about plagiarism,avoid plagiarism,key significanc...
Plagiarism,forms,understand about plagiarism,avoid plagiarism,key significanc...
 
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenshipThe role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
 
6 ways Samsung’s Interactive Display powered by Android changes the classroom
6 ways Samsung’s Interactive Display powered by Android changes the classroom6 ways Samsung’s Interactive Display powered by Android changes the classroom
6 ways Samsung’s Interactive Display powered by Android changes the classroom
 
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdfDBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
 
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTAParadigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
 
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptxComparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
 
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDecoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
 
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxGrade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
 

Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016

  • 1. Skynet Increasing Situational Awareness Through Computer VisionSOCOM Week 10 Increase situational awareness by automatically detecting humans on autonomous drone feeds Week 0 Increase situational awareness while minimizing cognitive load with a new human-drone interaction system 107 Interviews Many Interviews Later… Companies 8 Users 52 Experts 26 Buyers 14
  • 2. The Skynet Team Kevin Mott Alvin Goh Sam Gussman Olga Musayev International Policy Studies 2017 Mgmt Sci & Engr 2016 Symbolic Systems 2016 JD 2017 AD Infantry Officer Embedded Systems Engineer UI/UX Design Software Engineer Data Scientist and Lawyer
  • 3. The Problem Don’t want to take Operator out of the fight to watch a drone feed NAVY SEALs Fighting ISIS, 2016
  • 5. Mission Model Canvas V1- Week 0 SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas - SOF, Rangers, AWG - Law Enforcement Agencies - Drone manufacturers (ex: DJI) - Haptic startups - Augmented Reality Visualization Companies (ex: Google Glass) - Threat/Friendly detection - using light/sound/motion/indicat or/marking -HCI - feedback mechanism -Making system easy to use/learn/maintain - Primary: SOF elements and Ground Force Commanders - Secondary: Command elements at TOC/TAC -Tertiary: Search and Rescue teams -Enhance situational awareness - Drone becomes another set of eyes, frees up an operator. -Reduced risk to force- Drone goes so humans do not have to - video recording to facilitate AARs in training -Low cost alternative to costly assets- frees up other assets in a resource constrained environment - Reduces dependence on human capital -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from conventional units - Field test with one unit. Evaluate training method. - Expand field-tests to multiple units in same deployment context - With successful field tests, contract COTS vendors to mass produce. Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits, - Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4) - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training - Drones w/ camera (provided by SOCOM) - Augmented Reality Visualizer with developer tools - Haptic Specialists to act as advisors - Hapkit - Drone pilots - Soldiers / team leaders -Need current methods used to mark friendly forces -Support of an automated threat detection system Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Value proposition: Novel Human- drone interface to allow operators to control UAV drones easier Beneficiaries: SOF elements, Commanders, Search & Rescue Key partners: Law enforcement Augmented Reality Companies
  • 6. Weeks 0-3 Customer Discovery (Moffett field, Week 3) Experiment: audio vs visual cues What we did: - Interviews, Moffett Field visit - Cognitive Obstacle Course - Gear Assessment What we heard: “I don’t want another system…” What we thought: Operators need a new way of interacting with drones while remaining alert on the battlefield.
  • 8. Mission Model Canvas- Week 3 SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas - SOF, Rangers, AWG - Law Enforcement Agencies - Drone manufacturers (ex: DJI) - Haptic startups - Augmented Reality Visualization Companies (ex: Google Glass) - Threat/Friendly detection - using light/sound/motion/indicat or/marking -HCI - feedback mechanism -Making system easy to use/learn/maintain - Primary: SOF elements and Ground Force Commanders - Secondary: Command elements at TOC/TAC -Tertiary: Search and Rescue teams -Enhance situational awareness - Drone becomes another set of eyes, frees up an operator. -Reduced risk to force- Drone goes so humans do not have to - video recording to facilitate AARs in training -Low cost alternative to costly assets- frees up other assets in a resource constrained environment - Reduces dependence on human capital -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from conventional units - Field test with one unit. Evaluate training method. - Expand field-tests to multiple units in same deployment context - With successful field tests, contract COTS vendors to mass produce. Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits, - Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4) - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training - Drones w/ camera (provided by SOCOM) - Augmented Reality Visualizer with developer tools - Haptic Specialists to act as advisors - Hapkit - Drone pilots - Soldiers / team leaders -Need current methods used to mark friendly forces -Support of an automated threat detection system Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key PartnersKey partners: Law enforcement Augmented Reality Companies ?? Value proposition: Something that isn’t another new system A way to spot enemies keep track of each other Beneficiaries: SOF elements, Commanders, Search & Rescue
  • 9. Weeks 3-4 What We Heard: “Object detection in drone feeds would be huge.” What we thought: Operators need an extremely wide range of capabilities- drone swarms, facial recognition, etc.
  • 10. - Knowing the locations of friends/enemies/civilians - Reduced ambiguity - autonomous assessment of aerial perspectives and video feed Customer Jobs Shoot bad guys without getting shot - Cognitive overload from existing tools -Manpower losses - Hassle of systems not communicating Gains Pains Gain Creators Pain Relievers -Increased situational awareness on the battlefield - Reconnaissance of inaccessible places - Integrate with current systems that soldiers are familiar with - Frees up another soldier Products & Services Situationally aware drone with visual interface Value Proposition Canvas Pains New system to learn Gains Increase situation awareness Pains Integrate with ATAK Gains Detection ClassificationProduct ATAK plugin Customer jobs shoot bad guys without getting shot
  • 11. Mission Model Canvas- Week 4 SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas - SOF, Rangers, AWG - Law Enforcement Agencies - Drone manufacturers (ex: DJI) - Haptic startups - Augmented Reality Visualization Companies (ex: Google Glass) - Threat/Friendly detection - using light/sound/motion/indicat or/marking -HCI - feedback mechanism -Making system easy to use/learn/maintain - Primary: SOF elements and Ground Force Commanders - Secondary: Command elements at TOC/TAC -Tertiary: Search and Rescue teams -Enhance situational awareness - Drone becomes another set of eyes, frees up an operator. -Reduced risk to force- Drone goes so humans do not have to - video recording to facilitate AARs in training -Low cost alternative to costly assets- frees up other assets in a resource constrained environment - Reduces dependence on human capital -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from conventional units - Field test with one unit. Evaluate training method. - Expand field-tests to multiple units in same deployment context - With successful field tests, contract COTS vendors to mass produce. Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits, - Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4) - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training - Drones w/ camera (provided by SOCOM) - Augmented Reality Visualizer with developer tools - Haptic Specialists to act as advisors - Hapkit - Drone pilots - Soldiers / team leaders -Need current methods used to mark friendly forces -Support of an automated threat detection system Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key PartnersKey partners: ATAK programmers Computer vision experts Value proposition: Detection Classification Integration with ATAK Beneficiaries: SOCOM Green Berets, Rangers, SEALs JTACS, Drone Operators
  • 12. Weeks 5-6 What we thought: Difficult/slow process to get funding for development Channels What we heard: “There’s lots of efficiencies in the acquisition process.” S&T, SBIR, BAAs, RRTO and CTTO offices… Field testing Before After
  • 13. Deployment Timeline Comparison SBIR S&T Existing Contract 1 Year (6 months funding) Funding Expires 34 Months (2 Years funding) Max 2 Years (19 Months, 3 Weeks Funding) 6 121 102 34 2, +1 week 24
  • 14. Mission Model Canvas-- Weeks 5-6 SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas - SOF, Rangers, AWG - Law Enforcement Agencies - Drone manufacturers (ex: DJI) - Haptic startups - Augmented Reality Visualization Companies (ex: Google Glass) - Threat/Friendly detection - using light/sound/motion/indicat or/marking -HCI - feedback mechanism -Making system easy to use/learn/maintain - Primary: SOF elements and Ground Force Commanders - Secondary: Command elements at TOC/TAC -Tertiary: Search and Rescue teams -Enhance situational awareness - Drone becomes another set of eyes, frees up an operator. -Reduced risk to force- Drone goes so humans do not have to - video recording to facilitate AARs in training -Low cost alternative to costly assets- frees up other assets in a resource constrained environment - Reduces dependence on human capital -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from conventional units - Field test with one unit. Evaluate training method. - Expand field-tests to multiple units in same deployment context - With successful field tests, contract COTS vendors to mass produce. Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits, - Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4) - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training - Drones w/ camera (provided by SOCOM) - Augmented Reality Visualizer with developer tools - Haptic Specialists to act as advisors - Hapkit - Drone pilots - Soldiers / team leaders -Need current methods used to mark friendly forces -Support of an automated threat detection system Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Beneficiaries: Operators Buyers (S&T, acquisitions) SOCOM Channels S&T SOCOM SBIR SOCOM or DoD DARPA BAAs Buy-In Low-cost Replaceable COTS
  • 15. What we thought: Operators want to have automatic detection AND classification of humans in video feed What we did: - Even more interviews! - Explore current technology (is classification feasible? At what confidence levels?) Weeks 7-9 Lesson: Soldiers need to trust the UAV to make accurate classifications. Object Detection is a good starting point
  • 16. Mission Achievement Organization Beneficiary Mission Achievement SOCOM Tactical operators - Human detection - Location of humans detected - Autonomous flight PMs Get the right equipment to troops at a reasonable cost. DARPA ATAK PM Get ATAK utilized in multiple military organizations, create a plugin ecosystem to add value over time TAK sUAS plugin team Fully implemented plugin features DHS Border Patrol Improved identification and tracking of suspected illegal border crossers. Potential commercial partners Kespry/OceanIT/motionDSP Decreased R&D Costs, new revenue streams, relationships with US Government customers. Improvements to existing technology Skynet Team Skynet (Us) Awarded SBIR phase 1 & 2 OR Transition to S&T acquisition process (via SOCOM) or corporate
  • 17. Partners and Benefits Computer Vision Experts (Stanford Computer Vision Lab) AFRL J. (independent engineer) DARPA Activities Resources Partners People Recognition Geolocation of person ATAK Integration Easy UI/UX Pre-plan Routes Autonomous Flight Web Servers / Dataset Tagging, Training Data, Algorithm / Model Camera Metadata (DJI API), Drone Location data ATAK Source Code, ATAK Testing User Feedback Litchi, Open Source Navigation Code, Drones Trained Deep Learning Model, Drones ATAK Team - DARPA - AFRL SOCOM Operators Litchi (?) Open source drone software community TBD
  • 18. Mission Model Canvas- Week 7-9 SkyNetUI: Mission Model Canvas - SOF, Rangers, AWG - Law Enforcement Agencies - Drone manufacturers (ex: DJI) - Haptic startups - Augmented Reality Visualization Companies (ex: Google Glass) - Threat/Friendly detection - using light/sound/motion/indicat or/marking -HCI - feedback mechanism -Making system easy to use/learn/maintain - Primary: SOF elements and Ground Force Commanders - Secondary: Command elements at TOC/TAC -Tertiary: Search and Rescue teams -Enhance situational awareness - Drone becomes another set of eyes, frees up an operator. -Reduced risk to force- Drone goes so humans do not have to - video recording to facilitate AARs in training -Low cost alternative to costly assets- frees up other assets in a resource constrained environment - Reduces dependence on human capital -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from conventional units - Field test with one unit. Evaluate training method. - Expand field-tests to multiple units in same deployment context - With successful field tests, contract COTS vendors to mass produce. Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits, - Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4) - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training - Drones w/ camera (provided by SOCOM) - Augmented Reality Visualizer with developer tools - Haptic Specialists to act as advisors - Hapkit - Drone pilots - Soldiers / team leaders -Need current methods used to mark friendly forces -Support of an automated threat detection system Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key PartnersPartners: DARPA AFRL Computer Vision Experts SOCOM Resources Data, algorithms ATAK source code Drone Key Activities Computer Vision ATAK Integration Drone Hacking Mission Achievement Low-cost COTS drones that increase situational awareness Help DARPA start a program on drones
  • 19. Week 9 MVP “How am I supposed to feel vibration when I’m running around being shot at when I can’t feel my phone vibrate in my pocket walking to the bathroom?” “How does it know that someone is bad? I don’t want to go to jail…” “That’s badass” “Can you demo this in July” “I oddly feel more comfortable knowing there is a skynet drone watching out for me” Week 2 MVP From this... ...to this
  • 20. No Money 20192017 2018 2020 20212016 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 $500k $1m $5m Product Milestones MVP Businesses Milestones Beta 2.0 Release Class ends Demo events Apply SOCOM S&T, DARPA BAAs, SBIRs SOCOM S&T Funding or DARPA BAA funding 1.0 Release DIUx Demo events Demo events Sell product to large DoD contractor Find other Agency S&T Funding Try to become program of record while sustaining individual sales Apply Other Agency S&T Funding Finance and Operations Timeline Q1 Q2Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
  • 21. Who Helped us Get Here Wayne Chen Michael Hard Brian CS Jooyong Lee Andrew Smallwood Mentors: Army Rangers, Green Berets, Navy SEALs, Air Force Pararescuemen, and Norwegian SOF Sponsor: Tactical Operators: Thanks Brendon!
  • 23. Appendix Final mission model canvas Pictures Tech stack Key partners, resources, activities Progression of beneficiaries Progression of value proposition Acquisitions & deployment (timeline, get keep grow diagram, S&T process)
  • 24. Hardware: DIY custom drone kit Camera (color / thermal) Software: Open-sourced firmware Drone ATAK Cursor On Target* *Schema much like JSON Androidplugin Skynet Computer Vision (openCV) Drone navigation Object detection Object recognition DJI sdk / open-sourced sdk Android device What we have now
  • 25. What we learned About the product Refrain from building a new system Integrate with prefered existing systems (ATAK) COTS system - flexible, less expensive About the process Get out of the building! Distill the common pains and gains Understand the customer Dig deep but look broad
  • 26. Mission Model Canvas -Software development computer vision on drone feeds -People detection -Geolocation of person populated on map -Integration with ATAK and existing DoD tech -Autonomous drone hacking-not manufacturing - Hack COT drone like DJI - Partner with drone maker - Become sensor neutral DoD - SOCOM: S&T and acquisition PMs - DARPA PMs ATAK Integration - ATAK Programmers in DARPA and AFRL Computer Vision - Computer vision experts - Increase situational awareness through computer vision, detection of people and objects - Provide low-cost method of reconnaissance -Easy UI and use through integration w/ ATAK -Added value to current program/technology -Provide demo to pitch new program to Director of DARPA - Low-cost detection of movement and people at border - Increase ability to respond to sensors - Fulfill S&T Topic of Interest requirements - Establish and meet Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) - Achieve 80% accuracy rate on detecting people, with few false positives - Start new program for small UAVs in DARPA - Fulfill technical wishlist for ATAK - Improved identification and tracking of suspected illegal border crossers. - Achieve sustainable business selling in S&T phase to multiple agencies Q3, 2016 (May – June): $5,925 ($407 / Week) Q4, 2016 (July – Sept): $16,847 ($1,296 / Week) Q1, 2017 (Oct – Dec): $129,000 ($9,923 / Week) Q2, 2017 (Jan – March): $249,600 ($19,200 / Week) -Demonstrate utility + low- cost- gain support from senior personnel -Add utility to current program of record to increase adoption -Start a company or get acquired by another company Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Get awareness w/ demo days, technical experiment. conferences, etc. -S&T UAV Topic of Area-- submit white paper -Exchange expertise and collaborate -Talk with PMs, submit to BAA-16-31 -Demo TE, TILO, and Ranger training events in July Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Funding/Money, Access ATAK Integration -ATAK source code -DJI SDK or open-source Computer Vision -Algorithms (CV lab) - AMT / AWS -Training data: blimp or drone footage (AFRL) Autonomous Drone (DJI) Key Resources Key Partners SOCOM - Tactical operators - SOF (SF, Ranger, SEALS, JSOC, MARSOC/Recon, drone operators) - SOCOM PMs- Small UAV S&T PM, Acquisition PM, DARPA Tactical Technology Office-SquadX and future Small UAV program ATAK Program Manager AFRL DHS Border Patrol Skynet Because you asked for more color coding . . .
  • 27. What we did Customer Discovery (Moffett field, Week 3) ATAK MVP (Week 4) Processing a drone video feed (Week 4/5)
  • 28. ATAK mockup (Week 7) Product planning (Week 8) Week 9 MVP What we did
  • 29. The Journey ATAK screen 1: Satellite imagery ATAK screen 2: Drone feed
  • 30. The MVP Evolution “How am I supposed to feel vibration when I’m running around being shot at when I can’t feel my phone vibrate in my pocket walking to the bathroom?” “I need to know without a doubt that they’re holding a gun and not a baby” “As far as recognition, that’s huge.” “Are you sure it’s not a baby? I really don’t want to go to jail.” V0.01 V0.1 Current
  • 31. - Primary: SOF elements and Ground Force Commanders - Secondary: Command elements at TOC/TAC -Tertiary: Search and Rescue teams Our Beneficiaries COMBAT: SOF in a combat environment (TIC) --JTACs --Team leader NON-COMBAT: SOF in a non-combat environment DUAL USE: Search and Rescue teams COMBAT: SOF and Rangers in a combat environment (TIC) --JTACs --Team leader NON-COMBAT: SOF in a non-combat environment, interacting and training with allied troops DUAL USE: Search and Rescue teams Tactical operators - SOF (SF, Ranger, SEALS, MARSOC/Recon, drone operators) Private sector and academic partners (Neurala, drone manufacturer, Stanford lab) ATAK Program Manager SOCOM Small UAV S&T/Acquisition Program Managers Dual Use: Border Patrol Week 0 Week 2 Week 3 Week 6
  • 32. -Enhance situational awareness - Drone becomes another set of eyes, frees up an operator. -Reduced risk to force- Drone goes so humans do not have to -Live video feed -Low cost alternative to costly assets- frees up other assets in a resource constrained environment Minimize new load that needs to be carried - Reduces dependence on human capital Value proposition COMBAT: Drone uses visual recognition to separate enemies, friendlies, and noncombatants-- prevents collateral damage and fratricide NON-COMBAT: Drone flies route autonomously, increases awareness of surroundings, and could do patrols - Low cost alternative to costly assets Minimize new load that needs to be carried - Reduces human capital needs-- frees up man to fight - Identify and locate hostile and neutral actors - Enhanced ability to conduct real time recon (esp at night). - Enable extra soldier in fight - Autonomously fly routes and identify potential trouble. - Extending communications (e.g. inter-unit, with allied troops) - Conduct perimeter surveillance - Gather intelligence on nearby residents and distinguish between regular and irregular behavior of civilians in close proximity to military installations - Keep track of friendly, potential hostile and neutral actors/equipment automatically - New contracts and revenue streams - Opportunities for tech development -Added value to current program/technology -Cost effective, agile and quick method of filling capability gaps - Low-cost detection of movement and people at border Week 0 Week 2 Week 3 Week 6
  • 33. Week 9 SOCOM - Tactical operators - SOF (SF, Ranger, SEALS, MARSOC/Recon, drone operators) - SOCOM PMs- Small UAV S&T PM, Acquisition PM, Kespry, OceanIT, motionDSP, Stanford CV lab, drone manufacturers DARPA Tactical Technology Office- Persistent Air Support Project ATAK Program Manager DHS Border Patrol Skynet - Increase situational awareness through computer vision, recognition of people and objects - Provide low-cost method of reconnaissance -Easy UI and use through integration w/ ATAK - New contracts and revenue streams through the DoD - New use cases for product - Reputation and awareness -Added value to current program/technology - Low-cost detection of movement and people at border - Increase ability to respond to sensors product - market fit Value Proposition Beneficiaries
  • 35. S&T Process - Prototype to Product BAA for existing gap White Paper White Paper White Paper S&T PM (TBD) S&T PM’s Group of Operators Other operators who talk to operators in PM’s group Bureaucracy line Other operators who talk to operators in PM’s group S&T “Council”: S&T PMs + Director Engineer Proposal Contract Negotiations between business and PM: Statement of Work (COW); Contracts Data Requirements List (CDROLS) Step 1: find gap on fedbizops + submit whitepaper Step 2: All whitepapers get evaluated by operators and engineer Step 3: S&T PM brings selected white paper to “council” of PMs. They choose which projects to prioritize and fund. Step 4+5: Submit proposal and negotiate deliverables (CDROLS) and what you will do (COW) Step 0: “Free flowing” communication with operators and PM to show off product and get selected and prioritized
  • 36. Mission Model Canvas- Week 1 - Threat / Friendly detection using light / sound / motion / indicator / or marking -HCI - feedback mechanism Haptic = bad familiar = really important -Making system easy to use/learn/maintain - SOF, Rangers, AWG - Law Enforcement Agencies - Drone manufacturers (ex: DJI) - Haptic startups - Augmented Reality Visualization Companies (ex: Google Glass) - Primary: SOF elements and Ground Force Commanders - Secondary: Command elements at TOC/TAC -Tertiary: Search and Rescue teams -Enhance situational awareness - Drone becomes another set of eyes, frees up an operator. -Reduced risk to force- Drone goes so humans do not have to - video recording to facilitate AARs in training Live video feed -Low cost alternative to costly assets- frees up other assets in a resource constrained environment Minimize new load that needs to be carried - Reduces dependence on human capital -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -Demand across SOF elements and requests for fielding from conventional units - Field test with one unit. Evaluate training method. - Expand field-tests to multiple units in same deployment context - With successful field tests, contract COTS vendors to mass produce. Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits, - Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4) - Software design & engineering - Augmented reality hardware & software (equivalent of Google Glasses and relevant developer toolkits) Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training -Need current methods used to mark friendly forces - Rank and file soldiers, unit leaders, and commanders. - Support of an automated threat detection system - Military engineers to facilitate integration with systems Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Key Resources Key Partners - Drones w/ camera (provided by SOCOM) - Augmented Reality Visualizer with developer tools - Access to existing gear and standard equipment - Haptic Specialists to act as advisors - Hapkit - Drone pilots - Soldiers / team leaders
  • 37. Mission Model Canvas- Week 2 - Threat/friendly/noncombat. detection using visual recognition light/sound/ motion/indicator/or marking -HCI - feedback mechanism -Making system easy to use/learn/maintain - Integration with prefered sit. awareness platforms, including smart phones (As a Service) - SOF, Rangers, AWG - Law Enforcement Agencies - Drone manufacturers (ex: DJI) - Sparrow (Stanford CS210 Autonomous Drone project) - Haptic startups - Augmented Reality Visualization Companies (ex: Google Glass) -DARPA COMBAT: SOF in a combat environment (TIC) --JTACs --Team leader NON-COMBAT: SOF in a non-combat environment DUAL USE: Search and Rescue teams COMBAT: Drone uses visual recognition to separate enemies, friendlies, and noncombatants-- prevents collateral damage and fratricide NON-COMBAT: Drone flies route autonomously, increases awareness of surroundings, and could do patrols - Low cost alternative to costly assets Minimize new load that needs to be carried - Reduces human capital needs-- frees up man to fight -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -perform manpower intensive tasks in non-combat roles -Reduce fratricide and collateral damage - Identify program manager - Secure funding + contract from sponsor - Field test small-scale - Contract a manufacturer for large scale production - Deploy iteratively, for each integrate with a new system - Continue relationship via maintenance + integration service Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits, - Hapkit: Haptic Starter kit ($50 x 4) - Software design & engineering - Augmented reality hardware & software (equivalent of Google Glasses and relevant developer toolkits) Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training -Need current methods used to mark friendly forces - Rank and file soldiers, unit leaders, and commanders. - Support of an automated threat detection system - Military engineers to facilitate integration with systems ?????? Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Key Resources Key Partners - Drones w/ camera (provided by SOCOM) - Augmented Reality Visualizer with developer tools - Access to existing gear and standard equipment - Haptic Specialists to act as advisors - Hapkit - Drone pilots - Soldiers / team leaders
  • 38. Mission Model Canvas- Week 3 - Combatant classification and threat detection - Integration with ATAK & other military systems - Operable without GPS - SOF, Rangers, AWG - Law Enforcement Agencies - Autonomous Drone manufacturer (eg: Kespry) - ATAK Design group - Sparrow (Stanford CS210 Autonomous Drone project) - Augmented Reality Visualization Companies (ex: Osterhout Design Group) -DARPA COMBAT: SOF and Rangers in a combat environment (TIC) --JTACs --Team leader NON-COMBAT: SOF in a non-combat environment, interacting and training with allied troops DUAL USE: Search and Rescue teams - Identify and locate hostile and neutral actors - Enhanced ability to conduct real time recon (esp at night). - Enable extra soldier in fight - Autonomously fly routes and identify potential trouble. - Extending communications (e.g. inter-unit, with allied troops) - Conduct perimeter surveillance - Gather intelligence on nearby residents and distinguish between regular and irregular behavior of civilians in close proximity to military installations -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -perform manpower intensive tasks in non-combat roles -Reduce fratricide and collateral damage - Secure funding + contract - Small-scale testing - Contract a manufacturer for large scale production - Deploy iteratively, integrate with a new systems and provide lessons on use - Continue relationship via maintenance, integration service, and training Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits, - Software design & engineering - Augmented reality hardware & software (equivalent of Google Glasses and relevant developer toolkits) Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training 25k - relatively quick to acquire -for entirely new technology, writeup to SOCOM Saboteur - competition with other groups Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Key Resources Key Partners - DJI Drones w/ Dev. tools - AR Device w/ Dev. tools - ATAK API - Access to existing gear and standard equipment
  • 39. Mission Model Canvas- Week 4 - Identifying and tracking friendlies - Object detection - Object recognition, classification and threat detection - Integration with ATAK - SOF (green beret, ranger, SEALS) - SOCOM - Programmable drone manufacturers (eg: Solo) - ATAK Program - Neurala (or other computer vision firm) Tactical operators - SOF (SF, Ranger, SEALS, MARSOC/Recon, drone operators) Private sector partners (Neurala, drone manufacturer) ATAK Program Manager SOCOM Small UAV S&T/Acquisition Program Managers - Keep track of friendly, potential hostile and neutral actors/equipment automatically - New contracts and revenue stream - Opportunities for tech development -Added value to current program/technology -Cost effective, agile and quick method of filling capability gaps -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -reduce workload for tactical operators and feed-monitoring operators -decrease strain on other traditional aerial assets -Deploy to select teams under $25k level. Hardware purchased COTS -Incorporate commercial partner software in app dev -Work with ATAK to include future app update with our capabilities -Work to make program of record after buy in Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training -Demonstrate utility- gain support from senior personnel -Show opportunities for new revenue streams -Add utility to current program of record to increase adoption -Provide low cost product with new capability filling gap Saboteur - competition within SOCOM PMs Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Key Resources Key Partners - DJI phantom 3 programmable drone - Computer vision SDK (preferably neurala) - ATAK API + source code
  • 40. Mission Model Canvas- Week 5 - Fly autonomously on route - Object detection, recognition, classification - Identifying and tracking friendlies, enemies, civilians - Integration with ATAK - SOF (green beret, ranger, SEALS) - SOCOM, RRTO, CTTSO, JCTD, CTO - Programmable drone manufacturers (eg: Solo) - ATAK Program - Neurala (or other computer vision firm) -Stanford Computer Vision Lab Tactical operators - SOF (SF, Ranger, SEALS, MARSOC/Recon, drone operators) Private sector and academic partners (Neurala, drone manufacturer, Stanford lab) ATAK Program Manager SOCOM Small UAV S&T/Acquisition Program Managers Dual Use: Border Patrol - Keep track of friendly, potential hostile and neutral actors/equipment automatically - New contracts and revenue streams - Opportunities for tech development -Added value to current program/technology -Cost effective, agile and quick method of filling capability gaps - Low-cost detection of movement and people at border -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -reduce workload for tactical operators and feed-monitoring operators -decrease strain on other traditional aerial assets Options: 1). S&T Process 2). SBIR Process 3). Find existing contract (short term funding) Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training -Demonstrate utility- gain support from senior personnel -Show opportunities for new revenue streams -Add utility to current program of record to increase adoption -Provide low cost product with new capability filling gap Saboteur - competition within SOCOM PMs Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Key Resources Key Partners - Programmable Drone - Computer vision SDK (preferably neurala) - ATAK API + source code __= New
  • 41. Mission Model Canvas- Week 6 - Fly autonomously on route - Object detection, recognition, classification - Identifying and tracking friendlies, enemies, civilians - Integration with ATAK - SOF (green beret, ranger, SEALS) - SOCOM, RRTO, CTTSO, JCTD, CTO - Programmable drone manufacturers (eg: Solo) - ATAK Program - Neurala (or other computer vision firm) -Kespry -Stanford Computer Vision Lab Tactical operators - SOF (SF, Ranger, SEALS, MARSOC/Recon, drone operators) Private sector and academic partners (Neurala, drone manufacturer, Stanford lab) ATAK Program Manager SOCOM Small UAV S&T/Acquisition Program Managers Dual Use: Border Patrol - Keep track of friendly, potential hostile and neutral actors/equipment automatically - New contracts and revenue streams - Opportunities for tech development -Added value to current program/technology -Cost effective, agile and quick method of filling capability gaps - Low-cost detection of movement and people at border -Improved situational awareness for small units in combat -reduce workload for tactical operators and feed-monitoring operators -decrease strain on other traditional aerial assets Demo days, technical experimentation conferences, etc. S&T or SBIR Process, depending on level of prototype “How to” youtube videos, customer support Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training -Demonstrate utility- gain support from senior personnel -Show opportunities for new revenue streams -Add utility to current program of record to increase adoption -Provide low cost product with new capability filling gap Saboteur - competition within SOCOM PMs Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Key Resources Key Partners - Programmable Drone - Computer vision SDK - ATAK API + source code __= New
  • 42. Mission Model Canvas- Week 7 - Fly autonomously on route Phase 1: Computer vision: recognize people, vehicles - Integration with ATAK Phase 2: Computer vision: classify people into friendlies, enemies, civilians - Stand alone from ATAK - Augmented Reality - SOF (green beret, ranger, SEALS) - SOCOM, RRTO, CTTSO, JCTD, CTO - ATAK Program -Kespry, OceanIT, motionDSP -Stanford Computer Vision Lab - Programmable drone manufacturers (eg: Solo) -DARPA - Increase situational awareness of potential threats and collateral damage - Provide low-cost method of reconnaissance - New contracts and revenue streams - Opportunities for tech development -Added value to current program/technology - Low-cost detection of movement and people at border - Increase ability to respond to sensors - A job, money - Fulfill S&T Topic of Interest requirements - Establish and meet Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) - Discover what’s possible under SBIR OSD-162-003X - Achieve 80% accuracy rate on detecting people, with few false positives - Fulfill the DARPA wish list of technical features - Improved identification and tracking of suspected illegal border crossers. Get awareness w/ demo days, technical experiment. conferences, etc. -S&T UAV Topic of Area-- submit white paper -SBIR Phase 1 Grant “How to” youtube videos, customer support -Exchange expertise and collaborate Fixed: - Equipment - drones, development toolkits - Software design & engineering Variable: - Costs of maintenance, updates, and training -Demonstrate utility + low- cost- gain support from senior personnel -Show opportunities for new revenue streams -Add utility to current program of record to increase adoption -Start a company or get acquired by another company Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Key Resources Key Partners - Programmable Drone - Computer vision SDK - ATAK API + source code __= New SOCOM - Tactical operators - SOF (SF, Ranger, SEALS, MARSOC/Recon, drone operators) - SOCOM PMs- Small UAV S&T PM, Acquisition PM, Kespry, OceanIT, motionDSP, Stanford CV lab, drone manufacturers DARPA Tactical Technology Office- Persistent Air Support Project ATAK Program Manager DHS Border Patrol Skynet
  • 43. Skynet Origins Original Problem Statement: Traditional UAV video platforms require a tactical operator to control the UAV and watch the video, which takes them out of the fight and has a high cognitive load. Our goal is to develop an - autonomous drone that flies routes autonomously and gives reliable threat information without forcing an operator to take his hands off the trigger or eyes off the scope. Our Initial Idea: Since the root of the problem is cognitive overload, which stems from poorly designed UI and UX systems, we aimed to create an improved Human-Drone Interaction system that could be scaled across platforms. 90 In Person interviews (30 people surveyed) Our product would target the Small Unmanned Aerial System (SUAS) market TAM SAM (SUAS) SOCOM 3,000 units 800-1000 units DOD 18,210 units 17,296 units
  • 44. Mission Model Canvas- Week 8 -Software development computer vision on drone feeds -People recognition -Geolocation of person populated on map -Integration with existing DoD tech -Autonomous drone hacking-not manufacturing - Hack COT drone like DJI - Partner with drone maker - Become sensor neutral Funding from DoD - SOCOM - S&T and acquisition PMs - Contracting PMs Computer Vision - Amazon--AWS - Movidius -MotionDSP, OceanIT -Stanford CV Lab -Independent computer vision experts/contractors? ATAK Integration - ATAK Programmers - DARPA - “JL” for geolocation Autonomous Drones -DJI -Kespry - Programmable drone manufacturers (eg: Solo) - Increase situational awareness through computer vision, recognition of people and objects - Provide low-cost method of reconnaissance -Easy UI and use through integration w/ ATAK - New contracts and revenue streams through the DoD - New use cases for product - Reputation and awareness -Added value to current program/technology - Low-cost detection of movement and people at border - Increase ability to respond to sensors - Fulfill S&T Topic of Interest requirements - Establish and meet Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) - Discover what’s possible under SBIR OSD-162-003X - Achieve 80% accuracy rate on detecting people, with few false positives - Find long-term customers in DoD - Fulfill the DARPA wish list of technical features - Improved identification and tracking of suspected illegal border crossers. Get awareness w/ demo days, technical experiment. conferences, etc. -S&T UAV Topic of Area-- submit white paper -SBIR Phase 1 Grant “How to” youtube videos, customer support -Commercial partnership -Exchange expertise and collaborate Computer Vision - Computer Vision expert: over $100 per hour -MotionDSP- free - Data- ?? ATAK- free Drones- $1k and up Other- costs of maintenance, updates, and training -Demonstrate utility + low- cost- gain support from senior personnel -Show opportunities for new revenue streams -Add utility to current program of record to increase adoption -Start a company or get acquired by another company Beneficiaries Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs Buy-In/Support Deployment Value PropositionKey Activities Key Resources Key Partners Funding/Money Computer Vision -Computing power -Algorithms -Training data: blimp or drone footage ATAK Integration -ATAK source code -DJI SDK or open-source Autonomous Drone __= New SOCOM - Tactical operators - SOF (SF, Ranger, SEALS, MARSOC/Recon, drone operators) - SOCOM PMs- Small UAV S&T PM, Acquisition PM, Kespry, OceanIT, motionDSP, Stanford CV lab, drone manufacturers DARPA Tactical Technology Office- Persistent Air Support Project ATAK Program Manager DHS Border Patrol Skynet