A presentation about reducing nutrients from stormwater runoff through low-impact development/green infrastructure techniques. Presented by Rich Claytor, engineer with Horsley Witten Group, during the Buzzards Bay Coalition's 2013 Decision Makers Workshop series. Learn more at www.savebuzzardsbay.org/DecisionMakers
Managing the Watershed- Reducing Nutrients in Stormwater Runoff
1. Managing the Watershed-
Reducing Nutrients in
Stormwater Runoff
Buzzards Bay Coalition
Decision-Makers Workshop Series
UMass Cranberry Station, E. Wareham, MA
March 20, 2013
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
2. Today’s Agenda
• The basics of
stormwater and
watershed
management
• The evolution of stormwater management
towards Low Impact Development(LID)/
Green Infrastructure (GI)
• 2 Examples of watershed planning efforts
geared towards nutrient reduction
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
3. Stormwater/Watershed basics
Watershed Hydrology What is a
watershed?
A: a building for water
storage
B: the land area that drains
to a given water body
C: a shack from which
fishing occurs
D: a moment in time when
you cross into a new area
E: a new way of organizing
http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/features/story.aspx?id=668
environmental agencies
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
8. Stormwater/Watershed basics
At ~10% impervious we
begin to see:
•Water quality issues
•Impacts to biological
communities
•Increased flooding
•Stream erosion
•Loss of recreational uses
•Shellfish bed closures
•Reduced baseflow and
recharge
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
11. Stormwater Evolution LID/GI
Traditional controls LID/GI controls
• Goal: Get the water out • Goal: Reduce the amount of
of here as fast as possible surface runoff by reducing
impervious cover and
• Collect and storage in preserving natural areas
big, “hole in ground” off-
site • Rely on small, distributed on-
site practices
• Pipe discharge to a
stream or wetland • Infiltrate or reuse as much as
possible; filter before
• Limited water quality discharge
treatment and infiltration
• Source controls to minimize
• Stormwater is a waste pollution
product
• Stormwater is a resource
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
12. Stormwater basics
Runoff Hydrograph
Post-development
Pre-development
Post-development (with
traditional controls)
Post-development
Runoff (cfs)
(with LID/GI)
Adapted from David Nyman, ENSR
Time (hrs)
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
13. Low Impact Development (LID)
Traditional LID/GI
Site Design
BMPs
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
29. LID/GI Runoff Reduction Potential
Practice: Runoff Reduction
Ponds and Wetlands none to low
Infiltration highest
Bioretention moderate to high
Swales moderate to high
Porous Pavements high
Green Roofs moderate
Hydro-Separators none
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
30. Roger Williams Park, Providence, RI
• Largest & Most
Important Open
Space in Providence
• 435 Acres
• 100+ Acres of Ponds
• 1 Million visitors per
year
• Horace Cleveland
(Olmstead School),
1874
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
31. Roger Williams Park Ponds
Watershed Areas
South Watershed
North Watershed
Watershed Areas
North—977 acres
South—649 acres
Total—1,626 acres
50% Impervious
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
44. Preliminary Estimates of Annual Phosphorus Loads
Coming into the Roger Williams Park Ponds (lbs/year)
Total: 906 lbs/year
* Some Uncertainty Here ~70% Reduction required by TMDL
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
45. Watershed Management Plan
Implementation Recommendations
• Structural Best Management Practices;
• Non-structural measures (pavement
removal/shoreline vegetation);
• Geese population management
• In-pond treatment (water column,
sediment);
• Education and Outreach;
• Water quality monitoring; and
• Upper Watershed recommendations
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
85. Other Pollutant Sources:
• Waterfowl (Canadian Geese and Mute
Swans);
• Other wildlife;
• Pets;
• Fertilizer from lawns/gardens;
• Some agricultural loading; and
• Atmospheric deposition.
Horsley Witten Group, Inc.
This slide illustrates how impervious cover can alter the geomorphology of a stream channel. In watersheds with less than 5% impervious cover, streams are typically stable and pristine, provide a variety of habitats, maintain a diverse aquatic population and have good tree coverage. While this stream at 8-10% Impervious Cover is still relatively stable signs of stream erosion are more apparent, and there is some loss of good habitat. The surrounding area of this stream is approximately 20% impervious cover. Stream erosion is much worse than in the previous slide due to an absence of vegetation to hold together bank structure. The amount of erosion has been so great that the drain pipe that once rested on the stream bottom is now 2 feet above the water. This stream has a surrounding area of approximately 30% impervious cover. The channel is deeply cut down, there is little to no bank vegetation to prevent erosion, and there is little habitat structure. Above 65% impervious cover, the stream geomorphology is typically completely destroys by channelization. Concrete or pipes provide little to no habitat and support little to no aquatic organisms.
What parts of the approach are currently being implemented? Let’s build on those and incorporate these additional parts of the approach.
Add photo of mall
For anyone out there who thinks mathematically, this is a runoff hydrograph. The y axis is flow (cfs) and the x axis is time. SO, over time during a storm, the flow rate increases until it hits a peak. Under pre-development conditions, the peak flow is much lower than under post-development conditions. But you will also notice that the area under the curve is larger under post-development conditions. That area is the runoff volume. Not only do we want to control the peak flows, but also the volume.
Explain that salt ponds are naturally nutrient rich environments and the resulting productivity provides an excellent nursery for fish and shellfish. However, above critical thresholds excess nutrients degrade water quality.