SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Download to read offline
NATIONAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
             Amafel Building, Aguinaldo Highway Dasmariñas City, Cavite




                                Experiment No. 3

          “ACTIVE LOW-PASS and ACTIVE HIGH-PASS FILTERS”




Balane, Maycen M.                                                July 14, 2011

Signal Spectra and Signal Processing/BSECE 41A1                  Score:




                            Engr. Grace Ramones
                                    Instructor
OBJECTIVES:
     1. Plot the gain-frequency response and determine the cutoff frequency of a

        second-order (two-pole) low-pass active filter.

     2. Plot the gain-frequency response and determine the cutoff frequency of a

        second-order (two-pole) high-pass active filter.

     3. Determine the roll-off in dB per decade for a second-order (two-pole) filter.

     4. Plot the phase-frequency response of a second-order (two-pole) filter.
SAMPLE COMPUTATIONS:

Computed Av based on measured AdB

AdB = 20 log A

4.006 = 20 log A




Expected Av




AdB = 20 log A

3.776 = 20 log A
DATA SHEET:

THEORY
         In electronic communications systems, it is often necessary to separate a specific
range of frequencies from the total frequency spectrum. This is normally accomplished
with filters. A filter is a circuit that passes a specific range of frequencies while rejecting
other frequencies. Active filters use active devices such as op-amps combined with passive
elements. Active filters have several advantages over passive filters. The passive elements
provide frequency selectivity and the active devices provide voltage gain, high input
impedance, and low output impedance. The voltage gain reduces attenuation of the signal
by the filter, the high input prevents excessive loading of the source, and the low output
impedance prevents the filter from being affected by the load. Active filters are also easy to
adjust over a wide frequency range without altering the desired response. The weakness of
active filters is the upper-frequency limit due to the limited open-loop bandwidth (funity) of
op-amps. The filter cutoff frequency cannot exceed the unity-gain frequency (funity) of the
op-amp. Ideally, a high-pass filter should pass all frequencies above the cutoff frequency
(fc). Because op-amps have a limited open-loop bandwidth (unity-gain frequency, funity),
high-pass active filters have an upper-frequency limit on the high-pass response, making it
appear as a band-pass filter with a very wide bandwidth. Therefore, active filters must be
used in applications where the unity-gain frequency (funity) of the op-amp is high enough so
that it does not fall within the frequency range of the application. For this reason, active
filters are mostly used in low-frequency applications.
         The most common way to describe the frequency response characteristics of a filter
is to plot the filter voltage gain (Vo/Vin) in dB as a function of frequency (f). The frequency
at which the output power gain drops to 50% of the maximum value is called the cutoff
frequency (fc). When the output power gain drops to 50%, the voltage gain drops 3 dB
(0.707 of the maximum value). When the filter dB voltage gain is plotted as a function of
frequency using straight lines to approximate the actual frequency response, it is called a
Bode plot. A Bode plot is an ideal plot of filter frequency response because it assumes that
the voltage gain remains constant in the passband until the cutoff frequency is reached, and
then drops in a straight line. The filter network voltage gain in dB is calculated from the
actual voltage gain (A) using the equation

                                        AdB = 20 log A

where A = Vo/Vin.

        An ideal filter has an instantaneous roll-off at the cutoff frequency (fc), with full
signal level on one side of the cutoff frequency. Although the ideal is not achievable, actual
filters roll-off at -20 dB/decade or higher depending on the type of filter. The -20
dB/decade roll-off is obtained with a one-pole filter (one R-C circuit). A two-pole filter has
two R-C circuits tuned to the same cutoff frequency and rolls off at -40 dB/decade. Each
additional pole (R-C circuit) will cause the filter to roll off an additional -20 dB/decade. In a
one-pole filter, the phase between the input and the output will change by 90 degrees over
the frequency range and be 45 degrees at the cutoff frequency. In a two-pole filter, the
phase will change by 180 degrees over the frequency range and be 90 degrees at the cutoff
frequency.

        Three basic types of response characteristics that can be realized with most active
filters are Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Bessel, depending on the selection of certain filter
component values. The Butterworth filter provides a flat amplitude response in the
passband and a roll-off of -20 dB/decade/pole with a nonlinear phase response. Because of
the nonlinear phase response, a pulse waveshape applied to the input of a Butterworth
filter will have an overshoot on the output. Filters with a Butterworth response are
normally used in applications where all frequencies in the passband must have the same
gain. The Chebyshev filter provides a ripple amplitude response in the passband and a roll-
off better than -20 dB/decade/pole with a less linear phase response than the Butterworth
filter. Filters with a Chebyshev response are most useful when a rapid roll-off is required.
The Bessel filter provides a flat amplitude response in the passband and a roll-off of less
than -20 dB/decade/pole with a linear phase response. Because of its linear phase
response, the Bessel filter produces almost no overshoot on the output with a pulse input.
For this reason, filters with a Bessel response are the most effective for filtering pulse
waveforms without distorting the waveshape. Because of its maximally flat response in the
passband, the Butterworth filter is the most widely used active filter.

        A second-order (two-pole) active low-pass Butterworth filter is shown in Figure 3-1.
Because it is a two-pole (two R-C circuits) low-pass filter, the output will roll-off -40
dB/decade at frequencies above the cutoff frequency. A second-order (two-pole) active
high-pass Butterworth filter is shown in Figure 3-2. Because it is a two-pole (two R-C
circuits) high-pass filter, the output will roll-off -40 dB/decade at frequencies below the
cutoff frequency. These two-pole Sallen-Key Butterworth filters require a passband voltage
gain of 1.586 to produce the Butterworth response. Therefore,



and




       At the cutoff frequency of both filters, the capacitive reactance of each capacitor (C)
is equal to the resistance of each resistor (R), causing the output voltage to be 0.707 times
the input voltage (-3 dB). The expected cutoff frequency (fc), based on the circuit
component values, can be calculated from

                                            wherein,




FIGURE 3 – 1       Second-order (2-pole) Sallen-Key Low-Pass Butterworth Filter




FIGURE 3 – 2       Second-order (2-pole) Sallen-Key High-Pass Butterworth Filter
PROCEDURE

Low-Pass Active Filter

Step 1        Open circuit file FIG 3-1. Make sure that the following Bode plotter settings
              are selected: Magnitude, Vertical (Log, F = 10dB, I = -40dB), Horizontal (Log,
              F = 100 kHz, I = 100 Hz).

Step 2        Run the simulation. Notice that the voltage gain has been plotted between the
              frequencies of 100 Hz and 100 kHz by the Bode plotter. Draw the curve plot
              in the space provided. Next, move the cursor to the flat part of the curve at a
              frequency of approximately 100 Hz and measure the voltage gain in dB.
              Record the dB gain on the curve plot.




                     dB gain = 4.006 dB

Question:     Is the frequency response curve that of a low-pass filter? Explain why.

Step 3        Calculate the actual voltage gain (A) from the measured dB gain.

                     A = 1.586

Step 4        Based on the circuit component values in Figure 3-1, calculate the expected
              voltage gain (A) on the flat part of the curve for the low-pass Butterworth
              filter.

                     Av = 1.586

Question:     How did the measured voltage gain in Step 3 compared with the calculated
              voltage gain in Step 4?

              This result tells that we measured the exact voltage gain.
Step 5       Move the cursor as close as possible to a point on the curve that is 3dB down
             from the dB gain at the low frequencies. Record the dB gain and the
             frequency (cutoff frequency, fc) on the curve plot.

                    dB gain = 0.965 dB          fc = 5.321 kHz

Step 6       Calculate the expected cutoff frequency (fc) based on the circuit component
             values.

                    fc = 5305.16477 Hz

Question:    How did the calculated value for the cutoff frequency compare with the
             measured value recorded on the curve plot for the two-pole low-pass active
             filter?

                    % difference = 0.298 %
                    The measured value of cutoff frequency is not exactly the same with
                    the computed value but the difference is too small.

Step 7       Move the cursor to a point on the curve where the frequency is as close as
             possible to ten times fc. Record the dB gain and frequency (fc) on the curve
             plot.

                    dB gain = -36.202 dB               fc = 53.214 kHz

Questions:   Approximately how much did the dB gain decrease for a one-decade increase
             in frequency? Was this what you expected for a two-pole filter?

                   The dB gain decreased by -37.167 dB which is approximately -40 dB.
                This is expected for a two-pole filter because it has two R-C circuits.

Step 8       Click Phase on the Bode plotter to plot the phase curve. Change the vertical
             axis initial value (I) to 180 degrees and the final value (F) to 0 degree. Run
             the simulation again. You are looking at the phase difference (θ) between the
             filter input and output waveshapes as a function of frequency (f). Draw the
             curve plot in the space provided.
Step 9      Move the cursor as close as possible on the curve to the cutoff frequency (fc).
            Record the frequency (fc) and phase (θ) on the curve.

                   fc = 5.321 kHz              θ = -91.293 deg

Question:   Was the phase shift between input and output at the cutoff frequency what
            you expected for a two-pole low-pass filter?

                   The phase will be 90 degrees at the cutoff frequency, so yes, it is what
                   I expected.

Step 10     Click Magnitude on the plotter. Change R to 1 kΩ in both places and C to 1 pF
            in both places. Adjust the horizontal final frequency (F) on the Bode plotter
            to 20 MHz. Run the simulation. Measure the cutoff frequency (fc) and record
            your answer.

                   fc = 631.367 kHz

Step 11     Based on the new values for resistor R and capacitor C, calculate the new
            cutoff frequency (fc).

                   fc = 159.1549 MHz

Question:   Explain why there was such a large difference between the calculated and the
            measured values of the cutoff frequency when R = 1kΩ and C = 1pF. Hint:
            The value of the unity-gain bandwidth, funity, for the 741 op-amp is
            approximately 1 MHz.

                   There was such a large difference between the calculated and
                   measured values of the cutoff frequency because the calculated fc
                   exceeds the funity of the op-amp
High-Pass Active Filter

Step 12       Open circuit file FIG 3-2. Make sure that the following Bode plotter settings
              are selected: Magnitude, Vertical (Log, F = 10dB, I = -40dB), Horizontal (Log,
              F = 100 kHz, I = 100 Hz).

Step 13       Run the simulation. Notice that the voltage gain has been plotted between the
              frequencies of 100 Hz and 100 kHz by the Bode plotter. Draw the curve plot
              in the space provided. Next, move the cursor to the flat part of the curve at a
              frequency of approximately 100 kHz and measure the voltage gain in dB.
              Record the dB gain on the curve plot.




                     dB gain = 3.776 dB

Question:     Is the frequency response curve that of a low-pass filter? Explain why.

                     Yes,

Step 14       Calculate the actual voltage gain (A) from the measured dB gain.

                      A = 1.5445

Step 15       Based on the circuit component values in Figure 3-2, calculate the expected
              voltage gain (A) on the flat part of the curve for the high -pass Butterworth
              filter.

                     Av = 1.586

Question:     How did the measured voltage gain in Step 14 compare with the calculated
              voltage gain in Step 15?

                     The measured voltage gain differs with the calculated voltage gain
                     with a little percentage.
Step 16      Move the cursor as close as possible to a point on the curve that is 3dB down
             from the dB gain at the high frequencies. Record the dB gain and the
             frequency (cutoff frequency, fc) on the curve plot.

                   dB gain = 0.741 dB                 fc = 5.156 kHz

Step 17      Calculate the expected cutoff frequency (fc) based on the circuit component
             values.

                   fc =
                   fc = 5305.16477 Hz

Question:    How did the calculated value of the cutoff frequency compare with the
             measured value recorded on the curve plot for the two-pole low-pass active
             filter?

                   The measured value and the calculated value had a percent difference
                   of 2.89 % and yet still approximately the same.

Step 18      Move the cursor to a point on the curve where the frequency is as close as
             possible to one-tenth fc. Record the dB gain and frequency (fc) on the curve
             plot.

                   dB gain = -36.489 dB               fc = 515.619 Hz

Questions:   Approximately how much did the dB gain decrease for a one-decade
             decrease in frequency? Was this what you expected for a two-pole filter?

                   The dB gain decreased -37.23 dB which is approximately -40 dB. This
                   is expected for a two-pole filter.

Step 19      Change the horizontal axis final setting (F) to 50 MHz on the Bode plotter.
             Run the simulation. Draw the curve plot in the space provided.
Step 20     Measure the upper cutoff frequency (fc2) and record the value on the curve
            plot.

                  fc2 = 24.779 kHz

Question:   Explain why the filter frequency response looked like a band-pass response
            when frequencies above 1 MHz were plotted. Hint: The value of the unity-
            gain bandwidth, funity, for the 741 op-amp is approximately 1 MHz.
CONCLUSION:

       I, therefore conclude that active filters use active devices such as op-amps combined
with passive elements. Active filters have several advantages over passive filters. The
passive elements provide frequency selectivity and the active devices provide voltage gain,
high input impedance, and low output impedance. The passband voltage gain should be
1.586 to produce the Butterworth response. When the resistance of the resistor R and the
capacitance of capacitor C is decreased, the cutoff frequency will increase a lot.

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Comm008 e4 maala
Comm008 e4 maalaComm008 e4 maala
Comm008 e4 maala
 
Comm008 e4 pula
Comm008 e4 pulaComm008 e4 pula
Comm008 e4 pula
 
Bani (2)
Bani (2)Bani (2)
Bani (2)
 
Sarah
SarahSarah
Sarah
 
Pula
PulaPula
Pula
 
Comm008 e4 balane
Comm008 e4 balaneComm008 e4 balane
Comm008 e4 balane
 
Comm008 e4 pagara
Comm008 e4 pagaraComm008 e4 pagara
Comm008 e4 pagara
 
Exp2 passive band pass and band-stop filter
Exp2 passive band pass and band-stop filterExp2 passive band pass and band-stop filter
Exp2 passive band pass and band-stop filter
 
Exp passive filter (6)
Exp passive filter (6)Exp passive filter (6)
Exp passive filter (6)
 
Cauan
CauanCauan
Cauan
 
Pagara
PagaraPagara
Pagara
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for ABDON)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for ABDON)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for ABDON)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for ABDON)
 
3 (3)
3 (3)3 (3)
3 (3)
 
Am2
Am2Am2
Am2
 
Exp passive filter (5)
Exp passive filter (5)Exp passive filter (5)
Exp passive filter (5)
 
Exp passive filter (7)
Exp passive filter (7)Exp passive filter (7)
Exp passive filter (7)
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for PULA)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for PULA)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for PULA)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for PULA)
 
Exp passive filter (2)
Exp passive filter (2)Exp passive filter (2)
Exp passive filter (2)
 
Reyes
ReyesReyes
Reyes
 

Similar to Active Filters Experiment

Exp1 (passive filter) agdon
Exp1 (passive filter)   agdonExp1 (passive filter)   agdon
Exp1 (passive filter) agdonSarah Krystelle
 
unit-5 2nd part active filters by ACEIT.ppt
unit-5 2nd part active filters by ACEIT.pptunit-5 2nd part active filters by ACEIT.ppt
unit-5 2nd part active filters by ACEIT.pptamitthory13012003
 
Active filters & Low Pass Filters (LMS).ppt
Active filters & Low Pass Filters (LMS).pptActive filters & Low Pass Filters (LMS).ppt
Active filters & Low Pass Filters (LMS).pptAdnanZafar83
 
Filters 2
Filters 2Filters 2
Filters 2elipet
 
5. An analog filer has system fnction Ha(s)--a (a) (10 pts,) Comvert .pdf
5. An analog filer has system fnction Ha(s)--a (a) (10 pts,) Comvert .pdf5. An analog filer has system fnction Ha(s)--a (a) (10 pts,) Comvert .pdf
5. An analog filer has system fnction Ha(s)--a (a) (10 pts,) Comvert .pdfinfo324235
 
Communicationlabmanual
CommunicationlabmanualCommunicationlabmanual
Communicationlabmanualjkanth26
 
Communicationlabmanual
CommunicationlabmanualCommunicationlabmanual
Communicationlabmanualjkanth26
 
ECE 626 project report Switched Capacitor
ECE 626 project report Switched CapacitorECE 626 project report Switched Capacitor
ECE 626 project report Switched CapacitorKarthik Rathinavel
 

Similar to Active Filters Experiment (20)

Agdon
AgdonAgdon
Agdon
 
3 (1)
3 (1)3 (1)
3 (1)
 
Bani
BaniBani
Bani
 
Balane
BalaneBalane
Balane
 
Exp passive filter (4)
Exp passive filter (4)Exp passive filter (4)
Exp passive filter (4)
 
Exp passive filter (9)
Exp passive filter (9)Exp passive filter (9)
Exp passive filter (9)
 
Exp1 (passive filter) agdon
Exp1 (passive filter)   agdonExp1 (passive filter)   agdon
Exp1 (passive filter) agdon
 
Exp passive filter (1)
Exp passive filter (1)Exp passive filter (1)
Exp passive filter (1)
 
Active Filter (Low Pass)
Active Filter (Low Pass)Active Filter (Low Pass)
Active Filter (Low Pass)
 
unit-5 2nd part active filters by ACEIT.ppt
unit-5 2nd part active filters by ACEIT.pptunit-5 2nd part active filters by ACEIT.ppt
unit-5 2nd part active filters by ACEIT.ppt
 
Active filters & Low Pass Filters (LMS).ppt
Active filters & Low Pass Filters (LMS).pptActive filters & Low Pass Filters (LMS).ppt
Active filters & Low Pass Filters (LMS).ppt
 
Active filters
Active filtersActive filters
Active filters
 
Filters 2
Filters 2Filters 2
Filters 2
 
Filters2
Filters2Filters2
Filters2
 
5. An analog filer has system fnction Ha(s)--a (a) (10 pts,) Comvert .pdf
5. An analog filer has system fnction Ha(s)--a (a) (10 pts,) Comvert .pdf5. An analog filer has system fnction Ha(s)--a (a) (10 pts,) Comvert .pdf
5. An analog filer has system fnction Ha(s)--a (a) (10 pts,) Comvert .pdf
 
LICA-
LICA- LICA-
LICA-
 
Communicationlabmanual
CommunicationlabmanualCommunicationlabmanual
Communicationlabmanual
 
Communicationlabmanual
CommunicationlabmanualCommunicationlabmanual
Communicationlabmanual
 
16971168.ppt
16971168.ppt16971168.ppt
16971168.ppt
 
ECE 626 project report Switched Capacitor
ECE 626 project report Switched CapacitorECE 626 project report Switched Capacitor
ECE 626 project report Switched Capacitor
 

More from Sarah Krystelle

SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for PULA)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for PULA)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for PULA)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for PULA)Sarah Krystelle
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for CAUAN)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for CAUAN)Sarah Krystelle
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for CAUAN)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for CAUAN)Sarah Krystelle
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for AGDON)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for AGDON)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for AGDON)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for AGDON)Sarah Krystelle
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATIONSIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATIONSarah Krystelle
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION COPY 2
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION COPY 2SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION COPY 2
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION COPY 2Sarah Krystelle
 
Exp amplitude modulation (8)
Exp amplitude modulation (8)Exp amplitude modulation (8)
Exp amplitude modulation (8)Sarah Krystelle
 
Exp amplitude modulation (7)
Exp amplitude modulation (7)Exp amplitude modulation (7)
Exp amplitude modulation (7)Sarah Krystelle
 
Exp amplitude modulation (6)
Exp amplitude modulation (6)Exp amplitude modulation (6)
Exp amplitude modulation (6)Sarah Krystelle
 
Exp amplitude modulation (5)
Exp amplitude modulation (5)Exp amplitude modulation (5)
Exp amplitude modulation (5)Sarah Krystelle
 
Exp amplitude modulation (4)
Exp amplitude modulation (4)Exp amplitude modulation (4)
Exp amplitude modulation (4)Sarah Krystelle
 
Exp amplitude modulation (3)
Exp amplitude modulation (3)Exp amplitude modulation (3)
Exp amplitude modulation (3)Sarah Krystelle
 
Exp amplitude modulation (2)
Exp amplitude modulation (2)Exp amplitude modulation (2)
Exp amplitude modulation (2)Sarah Krystelle
 
Exp amplitude modulation (1)
Exp amplitude modulation (1)Exp amplitude modulation (1)
Exp amplitude modulation (1)Sarah Krystelle
 

More from Sarah Krystelle (20)

SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for PULA)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for PULA)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for PULA)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for PULA)
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for CAUAN)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 2 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for CAUAN)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for CAUAN)
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for AGDON)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for AGDON)SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for AGDON)
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT 1 - FINALS (for AGDON)
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATIONSIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION
 
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION COPY 2
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION COPY 2SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION COPY 2
SIGNAL SPECTRA EXPERIMENT AMPLITUDE MODULATION COPY 2
 
Exp amplitude modulation (8)
Exp amplitude modulation (8)Exp amplitude modulation (8)
Exp amplitude modulation (8)
 
Exp amplitude modulation (7)
Exp amplitude modulation (7)Exp amplitude modulation (7)
Exp amplitude modulation (7)
 
Exp amplitude modulation (6)
Exp amplitude modulation (6)Exp amplitude modulation (6)
Exp amplitude modulation (6)
 
Exp amplitude modulation (5)
Exp amplitude modulation (5)Exp amplitude modulation (5)
Exp amplitude modulation (5)
 
Exp amplitude modulation (4)
Exp amplitude modulation (4)Exp amplitude modulation (4)
Exp amplitude modulation (4)
 
Exp amplitude modulation (3)
Exp amplitude modulation (3)Exp amplitude modulation (3)
Exp amplitude modulation (3)
 
Exp amplitude modulation (2)
Exp amplitude modulation (2)Exp amplitude modulation (2)
Exp amplitude modulation (2)
 
Exp amplitude modulation (1)
Exp amplitude modulation (1)Exp amplitude modulation (1)
Exp amplitude modulation (1)
 
Am
AmAm
Am
 
Pula
PulaPula
Pula
 
Objectives
ObjectivesObjectives
Objectives
 
Morales
MoralesMorales
Morales
 
Exp5 bani
Exp5 baniExp5 bani
Exp5 bani
 
Exp5 balane
Exp5 balaneExp5 balane
Exp5 balane
 

Recently uploaded

Why device, WIFI, and ISP insights are crucial to supporting remote Microsoft...
Why device, WIFI, and ISP insights are crucial to supporting remote Microsoft...Why device, WIFI, and ISP insights are crucial to supporting remote Microsoft...
Why device, WIFI, and ISP insights are crucial to supporting remote Microsoft...panagenda
 
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platformsInfrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platformsYoss Cohen
 
QMMS Lesson 2 - Using MS Excel Formula.pdf
QMMS Lesson 2 - Using MS Excel Formula.pdfQMMS Lesson 2 - Using MS Excel Formula.pdf
QMMS Lesson 2 - Using MS Excel Formula.pdfROWELL MARQUINA
 
Accelerating Enterprise Software Engineering with Platformless
Accelerating Enterprise Software Engineering with PlatformlessAccelerating Enterprise Software Engineering with Platformless
Accelerating Enterprise Software Engineering with PlatformlessWSO2
 
Connecting the Dots for Information Discovery.pdf
Connecting the Dots for Information Discovery.pdfConnecting the Dots for Information Discovery.pdf
Connecting the Dots for Information Discovery.pdfNeo4j
 
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)Mark Simos
 
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyesHow to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyesThousandEyes
 
Generative AI - Gitex v1Generative AI - Gitex v1.pptx
Generative AI - Gitex v1Generative AI - Gitex v1.pptxGenerative AI - Gitex v1Generative AI - Gitex v1.pptx
Generative AI - Gitex v1Generative AI - Gitex v1.pptxfnnc6jmgwh
 
A Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
A Glance At The Java Performance ToolboxA Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
A Glance At The Java Performance ToolboxAna-Maria Mihalceanu
 
Bridging Between CAD & GIS: 6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
Bridging Between CAD & GIS:  6 Ways to Automate Your Data IntegrationBridging Between CAD & GIS:  6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
Bridging Between CAD & GIS: 6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integrationmarketing932765
 
Modern Roaming for Notes and Nomad – Cheaper Faster Better Stronger
Modern Roaming for Notes and Nomad – Cheaper Faster Better StrongerModern Roaming for Notes and Nomad – Cheaper Faster Better Stronger
Modern Roaming for Notes and Nomad – Cheaper Faster Better Strongerpanagenda
 
Assure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyes
Assure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyesAssure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyes
Assure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyesThousandEyes
 
Arizona Broadband Policy Past, Present, and Future Presentation 3/25/24
Arizona Broadband Policy Past, Present, and Future Presentation 3/25/24Arizona Broadband Policy Past, Present, and Future Presentation 3/25/24
Arizona Broadband Policy Past, Present, and Future Presentation 3/25/24Mark Goldstein
 
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and InsightsPotential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and InsightsRavi Sanghani
 
MuleSoft Online Meetup Group - B2B Crash Course: Release SparkNotes
MuleSoft Online Meetup Group - B2B Crash Course: Release SparkNotesMuleSoft Online Meetup Group - B2B Crash Course: Release SparkNotes
MuleSoft Online Meetup Group - B2B Crash Course: Release SparkNotesManik S Magar
 
Top 10 Hubspot Development Companies in 2024
Top 10 Hubspot Development Companies in 2024Top 10 Hubspot Development Companies in 2024
Top 10 Hubspot Development Companies in 2024TopCSSGallery
 
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App FrameworkReact Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App FrameworkPixlogix Infotech
 
All These Sophisticated Attacks, Can We Really Detect Them - PDF
All These Sophisticated Attacks, Can We Really Detect Them - PDFAll These Sophisticated Attacks, Can We Really Detect Them - PDF
All These Sophisticated Attacks, Can We Really Detect Them - PDFMichael Gough
 
QCon London: Mastering long-running processes in modern architectures
QCon London: Mastering long-running processes in modern architecturesQCon London: Mastering long-running processes in modern architectures
QCon London: Mastering long-running processes in modern architecturesBernd Ruecker
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Why device, WIFI, and ISP insights are crucial to supporting remote Microsoft...
Why device, WIFI, and ISP insights are crucial to supporting remote Microsoft...Why device, WIFI, and ISP insights are crucial to supporting remote Microsoft...
Why device, WIFI, and ISP insights are crucial to supporting remote Microsoft...
 
How Tech Giants Cut Corners to Harvest Data for A.I.
How Tech Giants Cut Corners to Harvest Data for A.I.How Tech Giants Cut Corners to Harvest Data for A.I.
How Tech Giants Cut Corners to Harvest Data for A.I.
 
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platformsInfrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
 
QMMS Lesson 2 - Using MS Excel Formula.pdf
QMMS Lesson 2 - Using MS Excel Formula.pdfQMMS Lesson 2 - Using MS Excel Formula.pdf
QMMS Lesson 2 - Using MS Excel Formula.pdf
 
Accelerating Enterprise Software Engineering with Platformless
Accelerating Enterprise Software Engineering with PlatformlessAccelerating Enterprise Software Engineering with Platformless
Accelerating Enterprise Software Engineering with Platformless
 
Connecting the Dots for Information Discovery.pdf
Connecting the Dots for Information Discovery.pdfConnecting the Dots for Information Discovery.pdf
Connecting the Dots for Information Discovery.pdf
 
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
 
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyesHow to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
 
Generative AI - Gitex v1Generative AI - Gitex v1.pptx
Generative AI - Gitex v1Generative AI - Gitex v1.pptxGenerative AI - Gitex v1Generative AI - Gitex v1.pptx
Generative AI - Gitex v1Generative AI - Gitex v1.pptx
 
A Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
A Glance At The Java Performance ToolboxA Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
A Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
 
Bridging Between CAD & GIS: 6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
Bridging Between CAD & GIS:  6 Ways to Automate Your Data IntegrationBridging Between CAD & GIS:  6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
Bridging Between CAD & GIS: 6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
 
Modern Roaming for Notes and Nomad – Cheaper Faster Better Stronger
Modern Roaming for Notes and Nomad – Cheaper Faster Better StrongerModern Roaming for Notes and Nomad – Cheaper Faster Better Stronger
Modern Roaming for Notes and Nomad – Cheaper Faster Better Stronger
 
Assure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyes
Assure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyesAssure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyes
Assure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyes
 
Arizona Broadband Policy Past, Present, and Future Presentation 3/25/24
Arizona Broadband Policy Past, Present, and Future Presentation 3/25/24Arizona Broadband Policy Past, Present, and Future Presentation 3/25/24
Arizona Broadband Policy Past, Present, and Future Presentation 3/25/24
 
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and InsightsPotential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
 
MuleSoft Online Meetup Group - B2B Crash Course: Release SparkNotes
MuleSoft Online Meetup Group - B2B Crash Course: Release SparkNotesMuleSoft Online Meetup Group - B2B Crash Course: Release SparkNotes
MuleSoft Online Meetup Group - B2B Crash Course: Release SparkNotes
 
Top 10 Hubspot Development Companies in 2024
Top 10 Hubspot Development Companies in 2024Top 10 Hubspot Development Companies in 2024
Top 10 Hubspot Development Companies in 2024
 
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App FrameworkReact Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
 
All These Sophisticated Attacks, Can We Really Detect Them - PDF
All These Sophisticated Attacks, Can We Really Detect Them - PDFAll These Sophisticated Attacks, Can We Really Detect Them - PDF
All These Sophisticated Attacks, Can We Really Detect Them - PDF
 
QCon London: Mastering long-running processes in modern architectures
QCon London: Mastering long-running processes in modern architecturesQCon London: Mastering long-running processes in modern architectures
QCon London: Mastering long-running processes in modern architectures
 

Active Filters Experiment

  • 1. NATIONAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Amafel Building, Aguinaldo Highway Dasmariñas City, Cavite Experiment No. 3 “ACTIVE LOW-PASS and ACTIVE HIGH-PASS FILTERS” Balane, Maycen M. July 14, 2011 Signal Spectra and Signal Processing/BSECE 41A1 Score: Engr. Grace Ramones Instructor
  • 2. OBJECTIVES: 1. Plot the gain-frequency response and determine the cutoff frequency of a second-order (two-pole) low-pass active filter. 2. Plot the gain-frequency response and determine the cutoff frequency of a second-order (two-pole) high-pass active filter. 3. Determine the roll-off in dB per decade for a second-order (two-pole) filter. 4. Plot the phase-frequency response of a second-order (two-pole) filter.
  • 3. SAMPLE COMPUTATIONS: Computed Av based on measured AdB AdB = 20 log A 4.006 = 20 log A Expected Av AdB = 20 log A 3.776 = 20 log A
  • 4. DATA SHEET: THEORY In electronic communications systems, it is often necessary to separate a specific range of frequencies from the total frequency spectrum. This is normally accomplished with filters. A filter is a circuit that passes a specific range of frequencies while rejecting other frequencies. Active filters use active devices such as op-amps combined with passive elements. Active filters have several advantages over passive filters. The passive elements provide frequency selectivity and the active devices provide voltage gain, high input impedance, and low output impedance. The voltage gain reduces attenuation of the signal by the filter, the high input prevents excessive loading of the source, and the low output impedance prevents the filter from being affected by the load. Active filters are also easy to adjust over a wide frequency range without altering the desired response. The weakness of active filters is the upper-frequency limit due to the limited open-loop bandwidth (funity) of op-amps. The filter cutoff frequency cannot exceed the unity-gain frequency (funity) of the op-amp. Ideally, a high-pass filter should pass all frequencies above the cutoff frequency (fc). Because op-amps have a limited open-loop bandwidth (unity-gain frequency, funity), high-pass active filters have an upper-frequency limit on the high-pass response, making it appear as a band-pass filter with a very wide bandwidth. Therefore, active filters must be used in applications where the unity-gain frequency (funity) of the op-amp is high enough so that it does not fall within the frequency range of the application. For this reason, active filters are mostly used in low-frequency applications. The most common way to describe the frequency response characteristics of a filter is to plot the filter voltage gain (Vo/Vin) in dB as a function of frequency (f). The frequency at which the output power gain drops to 50% of the maximum value is called the cutoff frequency (fc). When the output power gain drops to 50%, the voltage gain drops 3 dB (0.707 of the maximum value). When the filter dB voltage gain is plotted as a function of frequency using straight lines to approximate the actual frequency response, it is called a Bode plot. A Bode plot is an ideal plot of filter frequency response because it assumes that the voltage gain remains constant in the passband until the cutoff frequency is reached, and then drops in a straight line. The filter network voltage gain in dB is calculated from the actual voltage gain (A) using the equation AdB = 20 log A where A = Vo/Vin. An ideal filter has an instantaneous roll-off at the cutoff frequency (fc), with full signal level on one side of the cutoff frequency. Although the ideal is not achievable, actual filters roll-off at -20 dB/decade or higher depending on the type of filter. The -20 dB/decade roll-off is obtained with a one-pole filter (one R-C circuit). A two-pole filter has
  • 5. two R-C circuits tuned to the same cutoff frequency and rolls off at -40 dB/decade. Each additional pole (R-C circuit) will cause the filter to roll off an additional -20 dB/decade. In a one-pole filter, the phase between the input and the output will change by 90 degrees over the frequency range and be 45 degrees at the cutoff frequency. In a two-pole filter, the phase will change by 180 degrees over the frequency range and be 90 degrees at the cutoff frequency. Three basic types of response characteristics that can be realized with most active filters are Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Bessel, depending on the selection of certain filter component values. The Butterworth filter provides a flat amplitude response in the passband and a roll-off of -20 dB/decade/pole with a nonlinear phase response. Because of the nonlinear phase response, a pulse waveshape applied to the input of a Butterworth filter will have an overshoot on the output. Filters with a Butterworth response are normally used in applications where all frequencies in the passband must have the same gain. The Chebyshev filter provides a ripple amplitude response in the passband and a roll- off better than -20 dB/decade/pole with a less linear phase response than the Butterworth filter. Filters with a Chebyshev response are most useful when a rapid roll-off is required. The Bessel filter provides a flat amplitude response in the passband and a roll-off of less than -20 dB/decade/pole with a linear phase response. Because of its linear phase response, the Bessel filter produces almost no overshoot on the output with a pulse input. For this reason, filters with a Bessel response are the most effective for filtering pulse waveforms without distorting the waveshape. Because of its maximally flat response in the passband, the Butterworth filter is the most widely used active filter. A second-order (two-pole) active low-pass Butterworth filter is shown in Figure 3-1. Because it is a two-pole (two R-C circuits) low-pass filter, the output will roll-off -40 dB/decade at frequencies above the cutoff frequency. A second-order (two-pole) active high-pass Butterworth filter is shown in Figure 3-2. Because it is a two-pole (two R-C circuits) high-pass filter, the output will roll-off -40 dB/decade at frequencies below the cutoff frequency. These two-pole Sallen-Key Butterworth filters require a passband voltage gain of 1.586 to produce the Butterworth response. Therefore, and At the cutoff frequency of both filters, the capacitive reactance of each capacitor (C) is equal to the resistance of each resistor (R), causing the output voltage to be 0.707 times
  • 6. the input voltage (-3 dB). The expected cutoff frequency (fc), based on the circuit component values, can be calculated from wherein, FIGURE 3 – 1 Second-order (2-pole) Sallen-Key Low-Pass Butterworth Filter FIGURE 3 – 2 Second-order (2-pole) Sallen-Key High-Pass Butterworth Filter
  • 7. PROCEDURE Low-Pass Active Filter Step 1 Open circuit file FIG 3-1. Make sure that the following Bode plotter settings are selected: Magnitude, Vertical (Log, F = 10dB, I = -40dB), Horizontal (Log, F = 100 kHz, I = 100 Hz). Step 2 Run the simulation. Notice that the voltage gain has been plotted between the frequencies of 100 Hz and 100 kHz by the Bode plotter. Draw the curve plot in the space provided. Next, move the cursor to the flat part of the curve at a frequency of approximately 100 Hz and measure the voltage gain in dB. Record the dB gain on the curve plot. dB gain = 4.006 dB Question: Is the frequency response curve that of a low-pass filter? Explain why. Step 3 Calculate the actual voltage gain (A) from the measured dB gain. A = 1.586 Step 4 Based on the circuit component values in Figure 3-1, calculate the expected voltage gain (A) on the flat part of the curve for the low-pass Butterworth filter. Av = 1.586 Question: How did the measured voltage gain in Step 3 compared with the calculated voltage gain in Step 4? This result tells that we measured the exact voltage gain.
  • 8. Step 5 Move the cursor as close as possible to a point on the curve that is 3dB down from the dB gain at the low frequencies. Record the dB gain and the frequency (cutoff frequency, fc) on the curve plot. dB gain = 0.965 dB fc = 5.321 kHz Step 6 Calculate the expected cutoff frequency (fc) based on the circuit component values. fc = 5305.16477 Hz Question: How did the calculated value for the cutoff frequency compare with the measured value recorded on the curve plot for the two-pole low-pass active filter? % difference = 0.298 % The measured value of cutoff frequency is not exactly the same with the computed value but the difference is too small. Step 7 Move the cursor to a point on the curve where the frequency is as close as possible to ten times fc. Record the dB gain and frequency (fc) on the curve plot. dB gain = -36.202 dB fc = 53.214 kHz Questions: Approximately how much did the dB gain decrease for a one-decade increase in frequency? Was this what you expected for a two-pole filter? The dB gain decreased by -37.167 dB which is approximately -40 dB. This is expected for a two-pole filter because it has two R-C circuits. Step 8 Click Phase on the Bode plotter to plot the phase curve. Change the vertical axis initial value (I) to 180 degrees and the final value (F) to 0 degree. Run the simulation again. You are looking at the phase difference (θ) between the filter input and output waveshapes as a function of frequency (f). Draw the curve plot in the space provided.
  • 9. Step 9 Move the cursor as close as possible on the curve to the cutoff frequency (fc). Record the frequency (fc) and phase (θ) on the curve. fc = 5.321 kHz θ = -91.293 deg Question: Was the phase shift between input and output at the cutoff frequency what you expected for a two-pole low-pass filter? The phase will be 90 degrees at the cutoff frequency, so yes, it is what I expected. Step 10 Click Magnitude on the plotter. Change R to 1 kΩ in both places and C to 1 pF in both places. Adjust the horizontal final frequency (F) on the Bode plotter to 20 MHz. Run the simulation. Measure the cutoff frequency (fc) and record your answer. fc = 631.367 kHz Step 11 Based on the new values for resistor R and capacitor C, calculate the new cutoff frequency (fc). fc = 159.1549 MHz Question: Explain why there was such a large difference between the calculated and the measured values of the cutoff frequency when R = 1kΩ and C = 1pF. Hint: The value of the unity-gain bandwidth, funity, for the 741 op-amp is approximately 1 MHz. There was such a large difference between the calculated and measured values of the cutoff frequency because the calculated fc exceeds the funity of the op-amp
  • 10. High-Pass Active Filter Step 12 Open circuit file FIG 3-2. Make sure that the following Bode plotter settings are selected: Magnitude, Vertical (Log, F = 10dB, I = -40dB), Horizontal (Log, F = 100 kHz, I = 100 Hz). Step 13 Run the simulation. Notice that the voltage gain has been plotted between the frequencies of 100 Hz and 100 kHz by the Bode plotter. Draw the curve plot in the space provided. Next, move the cursor to the flat part of the curve at a frequency of approximately 100 kHz and measure the voltage gain in dB. Record the dB gain on the curve plot. dB gain = 3.776 dB Question: Is the frequency response curve that of a low-pass filter? Explain why. Yes, Step 14 Calculate the actual voltage gain (A) from the measured dB gain. A = 1.5445 Step 15 Based on the circuit component values in Figure 3-2, calculate the expected voltage gain (A) on the flat part of the curve for the high -pass Butterworth filter. Av = 1.586 Question: How did the measured voltage gain in Step 14 compare with the calculated voltage gain in Step 15? The measured voltage gain differs with the calculated voltage gain with a little percentage.
  • 11. Step 16 Move the cursor as close as possible to a point on the curve that is 3dB down from the dB gain at the high frequencies. Record the dB gain and the frequency (cutoff frequency, fc) on the curve plot. dB gain = 0.741 dB fc = 5.156 kHz Step 17 Calculate the expected cutoff frequency (fc) based on the circuit component values. fc = fc = 5305.16477 Hz Question: How did the calculated value of the cutoff frequency compare with the measured value recorded on the curve plot for the two-pole low-pass active filter? The measured value and the calculated value had a percent difference of 2.89 % and yet still approximately the same. Step 18 Move the cursor to a point on the curve where the frequency is as close as possible to one-tenth fc. Record the dB gain and frequency (fc) on the curve plot. dB gain = -36.489 dB fc = 515.619 Hz Questions: Approximately how much did the dB gain decrease for a one-decade decrease in frequency? Was this what you expected for a two-pole filter? The dB gain decreased -37.23 dB which is approximately -40 dB. This is expected for a two-pole filter. Step 19 Change the horizontal axis final setting (F) to 50 MHz on the Bode plotter. Run the simulation. Draw the curve plot in the space provided.
  • 12. Step 20 Measure the upper cutoff frequency (fc2) and record the value on the curve plot. fc2 = 24.779 kHz Question: Explain why the filter frequency response looked like a band-pass response when frequencies above 1 MHz were plotted. Hint: The value of the unity- gain bandwidth, funity, for the 741 op-amp is approximately 1 MHz.
  • 13. CONCLUSION: I, therefore conclude that active filters use active devices such as op-amps combined with passive elements. Active filters have several advantages over passive filters. The passive elements provide frequency selectivity and the active devices provide voltage gain, high input impedance, and low output impedance. The passband voltage gain should be 1.586 to produce the Butterworth response. When the resistance of the resistor R and the capacitance of capacitor C is decreased, the cutoff frequency will increase a lot.