Anúncio

May 2013 Presentation

Assistant University Librarian em Pace University
14 de May de 2013
Anúncio

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Apresentações para você(20)

Anúncio

Similar a May 2013 Presentation(20)

Anúncio

May 2013 Presentation

  1. The Shocking Truth About Student Research Skills (…And How It’s Spreading Across the Country!) Sarah Burns Feyl, Assistant University Librarian Doug Heimbigner, Instructional Services Librarian Jennifer Rosenstein, First Year Outreach Services Librarian
  2. What is Project Information Literacy? O National study about college students and their research habits O Started in 2008: six studies since then O Methods: surveys, interviews, focus groups, content analysis O Participants: over 11,000 students at 50+ U.S. institutions O You can see the list of institutions at the website: http://projectinfolit.org
  3. Pace Library Experience Survey O Conducted in UNV 101 beginning in 2000 O Paper survey, we tried online and our response rate dropped significantly O The survey has evolved over time O i.e. removed the question asking if they use social networking tools O We receive surveys from about 1/3 to 1/2 of the first year students
  4. Findings: O “What one word sums up how you feel at the moment you receive a course-related research assignment?” O Angst, tired, dread, fear, anxious, annoyed, stressed, disgusted, intrigued, excited, confused, and overwhelmed http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
  5. Findings: O What did PIL students report as the most difficult step of the course-related research process? O Getting started (84%) O Defining a topic (66%) O Narrowing it down (62%) O Filtering through irrelevant results (61%) http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf
  6. Findings: Getting Started O POLL O When do students begin working on a research assignment? O 2 to 3 days before it is due
  7. Findings: Getting Started O Related: A large majority of students reported spending three hours on research and another two hours on writing—one or two days before a 5-7 page course-related research paper was due. http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
  8. Findings: Context O When beginning a research assignment, PIL students indicate the need for “big picture” context, a summary of the topic, background information, overview of vocabulary O Where do students get this “big picture” context? O POLL O Wikipedia http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_finalv_YR1_12_2009v2.pdf
  9. Findings: Wikipedia O Wikipedia gave students a workaround for obtaining the big picture and language contexts they frequently lacked for course- related research O In nearly three-quarters of the student discussions—8 out of 11 sessions— there was a strong consensus among students that their research process began with Wikipedia http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
  10. Findings: Beginning the Assignment O Where do students actually begin their course-related research assignments? O POLL O In PIL, almost all of the respondents turned to course readings first O In the PLES, over 50% of respondents start with an “Internet search” http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_finalv_YR1_12_2009v2.pdf
  11. Findings: Use of the Library O What percentage of students use Library research databases to search for articles? O POLL O PIL: 80% (college students) O PLES: 58% (used in high school) http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
  12. Findings: Use of the Library O What percentage of students use the Library’s Catalog to search for books? O POLL O PIL: 78% (college students) O PLES: 62% (used in high school) http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
  13. Findings: Databases O What is the top reason PIL students report using scholarly research databases? O POLL O they are a source of credible information (78%) O to meet instructorsʼexpectations (74%) O to succeed on the assignment (62%) O it saved them a visit the library (43%) http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
  14. Findings: Librarians O What percentage of students used a librarian for help with a course-related research assignment? O POLL O PIL: 20% O PLES: only 52% of first year students indicated they had a research session with their high school librarian http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
  15. Findings: Evaluating Information O What is the top factor considered by PIL students when evaluating web content? O Whether the content was up-to-date (77%) O Author’s credentials (73%) O Site URL or domain (i.e. .edu or .gov) (71%) O If a bibliography exists on the site (54%) http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf
  16. Findings: Evaluating Information O How do Pace students evaluate web content? O Comparing to other information sources (15%) O Does it have citations/sources listed (13%) O Domain (.edu , .gov ) (13%)
  17. Findings: Finishing O Students were perplexed with completing the research process with almost half finding it difficult to decide whether they had done a “good job” (46%). O “the first stages of research for course work initiate a process few students thoroughly understand and grasp with much confidence. Few students we interviewed considered themselves wholly competent at completing research for one course research assignment to the next.” http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf
  18. What can we do to help students?
  19. Findings: Role of Instructors O Almost two-thirds of the sample (63%) found in-class discussions about how to conduct research useful O The actual writing and editing of papers is another way that students see instructors helping them complete course-related research assignments. A majority of the respondents (71%) considered instructorsʼreview of paper drafts helpful http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
  20. Findings: Role of Instructors O Over three-fourths of the students (76%) surveyed considered written guidelines about course-related assignments, especially which sources to use, as one of the most helpful materials an instructor can provide http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Handout_Study_finalvJuly_2010.pdf
  21. Thank you! O Sarah Burns Feyl O sburnsfeyl@pace.edu O Doug Heimbigner O dheimbigner@pace.edu O Jennifer Rosenstein O jrosenstein@pace.edu

Notas do Editor

  1. We will be conducting interactive polls during the sessionPlease get out your mobile phones, tablets (iPads) or laptops
  2. SBF
  3. SBF
  4. DH
  5. DH
  6. SBFJR runs the polls!Overall, though, we found more than 80% of students interviewed procrastinated on more than 80% of their course-related research assignments.
  7. SBF
  8. SBF
  9. SBF “Wikipedia is my presearch tool.” In other words, Wikipedia was used for pre-researching a topic and preceded what students described as “serious research,” which involved searching scholarly databases, such as ProQuest, JSTOR, or EBSCO.Students who used scholarly databases after a Wikipedia search said that they avoided starting with scholarly databases first because it was “too much too soon.” Overall, students reported that scholarly articles had “too much technical jargon before I understand what I am writing about” and “were often not up to date as Wikipedia.” Before talking to a professor, students admitted, too, they needed background about a topic.
  10. DH
  11. DH
  12. DH
  13. DH
  14. DHStudents in our sample were much more likely to use a librarian when they needed help finding the meaning of a word or term related to a topic or figuring out what search terms to use. Also, respondents were more likely to turn to librarians for help with finding full text materials that were available from different sources.
  15. SBFNearly half of the students in the sample (49%) frequently asked instructors for assistance with assessing the quality of sources for course work—far fewer asked librarians (11%) for assistance. (p.3)we asked students in our follow-up interviews about what percentage of total time spent on research they put into evaluating sources. This percentage ranged from 10% to 30% of studentsʼ total research time.
  16. SBF
  17. SBFOver a third of the students in the sample reported difficulties with knowing how to cite (41%) and writing about research results (38%) were difficult steps in the course-related research process. And about a third of the respondents (35%) reported it was difficult to figure out if their use of a source constituted plagiarism, or not, when completing course-related research assignments.
  18. JRGallery WalkSBF, DH untape sheets of paper
  19. SBF
  20. SBFThe handouts in our sample most frequently (60%) recommended students use the campus library shelves and to a lesser extent, (43%) online library sourcesFew of the handouts(14%) that directed students to use the libraryʼs online scholarly research databases (such as those provided by EBSCO, JSTOR, orProQuest) specified which database to use by vendor or file name from the hundreds that tend to be available.Only 13% of the handouts suggested consulting a librarian for assistance with research. Yet, about half of the faculty we interviewed discussed their ownreliance on librarians.
Anúncio