O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

Integrated basement floor design

349 visualizações

Publicada em

Description and choice for the integrated basement floor for project Terminal A Schiphol

Publicada em: Engenharia
  • Entre para ver os comentários

  • Seja a primeira pessoa a gostar disto

Integrated basement floor design

  1. 1. www.abt.eu Terminal A - Integrated basement floor
  2. 2. KL AIR / integrated basement floor Content 2  3 main design principles: Description, examples and comparison  Comparison and choice for KL AIR  Questions and dialogue
  3. 3. water pressure underwater concrete floor (UCF) tension piles retaining wall strut Building stage strut force (compression)
  4. 4. Final stage underwater concrete floor (UCF) in traditional design no permanent function permanent basement structure
  5. 5. bouw definitieve constructie Final stage
  6. 6. 3 basement floor principles Traditional building method: - Unreinforced UCF for temporary function - Reinforced concrete floor for permanent function - Applied in many projects (also with SFRUCF) Integrated basement floor: - For the permanent function the steel fibre reinforced UCF (SFRUCF) is collaborating with a traditional reinforced concrete floor - Applied within 3 projects Permanent SFRUCF: - SFRUCF has a temporary and a permanent function - Under investigation by ABT and committee of SBRCURnet/CROW - Not yet applied in practice
  7. 7. Traditional building method unreinforced UCF with temporary function reinforced floor with permanent function
  8. 8. P-Campusplein (VU Amsterdam) unreinforced UCF with temporary function
  9. 9. Mauritshuis The Hague SFRUCF with temporary function
  10. 10. Groninger Forum SFRUCF with temporary function
  11. 11. SFRUCF with temporary function Traditional building method with SFRUCF
  12. 12. Project Location Year Basement floor principle Potzdammerplatz Berlin 1997 Traditional building method Onderdoorgang Heinoseweg Tilburg 2001 Traditional building method 2001: Eerste publicatie CUR-aanbeveling 77 Ontvangstschacht Botlekspoortunnel Rotterdam 2004 Traditional building method Muziekpaleis Utrecht 2010 Traditional building method Nieuwbouw Agrifirm Kampen 2013 Traditional building method Ondergrondse uitbreiding Mauritshuis The Hague 2013 Traditional building method Groninger Forum Groningen 2014 Traditional building method 2014: Herziene versie CUR-aanbeveling 77 Lammermarkt Leiden 2015 Traditional building method Onderdoorgang langzaam verkeer Zevenaar 2016 Integrated basement floor Strandhotel Cadzand-Bad Cadzand 2016 Semi integrated? Parking garage Albert Cuyp Amsterdam 2016 Integrated basement floor Dry dock Royal Van Lent Amsterdam 2018 Integrated basement floor Projects with SFRUCF
  13. 13. SFRUCF collaborates with a traditional reinforced concrete floor Integrated basement floor
  14. 14. Onderdoorgang Zevenaar integrated basement floor
  15. 15. Onderdoorgang Zevenaar integrated basement floor
  16. 16. Albert Cuyp garage integrated basement floor
  17. 17. Albert Cuyp garage integrated basement floor
  18. 18. Albert Cuyp garage integrated basement floor
  19. 19. Droogdok Royal Van Lent integrated basement floor
  20. 20. Droogdok Royal Van Lent integrated basement floor
  21. 21. SFRUCF has a temporary and a permanent function Permanent SFRUCF
  22. 22. Comparison See previous slides for comparison: - strength and stiffness, - risk of leakage - need for permanent retaining wall To the right a general comparison: • carbon footprint (green) • direct building costs (blue) Note: Comparison for the floor only. Effects on foundation (piles) and building pit are not taken into account. only possible for shallow basements (no UCF)
  23. 23. Water tightness  crack width control (case Albert Cuyp) Comparison Albert Cuyp: Integrated basement floor Albert Cuyp: Traditional building method 6,3 18,3 Albert Cuyp: traditional: integrated:
  24. 24. Aspect Traditional building method Integrated basement floor Permanent UCF Excavation depth - 0 0 Innovation risks ++ + -- Risk of leakage - 0 -- Foundation capacity (piled-raft-foundation) 0 ++ + Foundation flexibility 0 ++ 0 Building costs (including foundation) -- 0 + Building time -- - + Sustainability - 0 ++ Costs for permanent retaining wall No Advisable Yes Comparison and choice for KL AIR Note: A permanent soilretaining wall is assumed to be necessary for this project.
  25. 25. More information: Ruud Arkesteijn r.arkesteijn@abt.eu +31(0)15 270 3686 LinkedIn.com/ruudarkesteijn Blogs on www.ABT.eu (in Dutch) Articles in Civiele techniek and Geotechniek (in Dutch) 25

×