O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

Ethics in Design

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Próximos SlideShares
Why we don't innovate?
Why we don't innovate?
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 13 Anúncio

Ethics in Design

Baixar para ler offline

Slides for the online forum:

The Design Society Chat Room: Ethics in Design
Thursday 29th October 2020 @8pm GMT/UTC

https://www.designsociety.org/1079/The+Design+Society+Chat+Room%3A+Ethics+in+Design

Slides for the online forum:

The Design Society Chat Room: Ethics in Design
Thursday 29th October 2020 @8pm GMT/UTC

https://www.designsociety.org/1079/The+Design+Society+Chat+Room%3A+Ethics+in+Design

Anúncio
Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Semelhante a Ethics in Design (20)

Mais de Innovation Leader (20)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

Ethics in Design

  1. 1. Ethics in Design The Design Society Chat Room
  2. 2. Hard Skills Soft Skills Andrew J. Hawkins @andyjayhawk Andrew J. Hawkins @andyjayhawk
  3. 3. Courtney E. Martin: “You’ve been working with a lot of other designers thinking about what is our ethical mandate, what is our Hippocratic oath for design. Can you talk about how you’re thinking about that these days?”
  4. 4. “I think if we made the oath to first do no harm as designers, we would likely never do anything new. I would hate for designers to feel like we can’t ever engage with something that’s unknown, because we’re worried about what the outcomes might be.”
  5. 5. https://axbom.blog/first-design-no-harm/ Some curious assumptions: • An adherence to the Hippocratic Oath would mean that there is no innovation. Medicine has seen a fair bit of innovation since the fifth and third centuries BC. • Being ethical means taking no risks. Primum non nocere (first do no harm): there is no intervention in medical practice that does not also have risk. • Doing nothing is what creates the least harm.
  6. 6. • Intentions are not enough • Question who are involved? • Full, informed consent • Look out for assumptions • ‘Empathy’? • Scale effects • Indirect, negative consequences, trade-offs • Focus on contributing to well-being • Open and document ethical decisions
  7. 7. “We have to engage with the commitment to stay involved in the ever-changing nature of what the design problem is. This sort of “fire and forget” idea about design: that we would finish our design, and launch it into the world, and after that it was other people’s problem… That mindset is destructive now, because these things don’t stay in the same state that we designed them in. They continue to evolve.”
  8. 8. https://www.fda.gov/patients/drug-development-process/step-5-fda-post-market-drug-safety-monitoring
  9. 9. The “designer fallacy”: the notion that a designer can design into a technology, its purposes and uses I am attempting to show that the design situation is considerably more complex and less transparent. Both the designer-materiality relation, and the artifact-user relations are complex and multistable. Both intended results and unintended results are unpredictable.

×