O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

Public Management and ST&I Governance Based on Intellectual Capital and Social Coproduction

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 24 Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Semelhante a Public Management and ST&I Governance Based on Intellectual Capital and Social Coproduction (20)

Mais de Roberto C. S. Pacheco (20)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

Public Management and ST&I Governance Based on Intellectual Capital and Social Coproduction

  1. 1. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND ST&I GOVERNANCE BASED ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND SOCIAL COPRODUCTION Roberto Carlos dos Santos Pacheco – pacheco@egc.ufsc.br Paulo Mauricio Selig – selig@egc.ufsc.br Everton Ricardo do Nascimento – everton.nascimento@unemat.br Eduardo Giugliani – giugliani@pucrs.br The 4th Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital Excellence Awards
  2. 2. AGENDA • About us • Coproducing in ST&I • IC Outcomes • Plans to the future
  3. 3. WHO WE ARE?
  4. 4. KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND MANAGENT – EGC/UFSC/BRAZIL 2004 EGC was approved by CAPES to initiate as an Interdisciplinary Graduate Program 33Researchers from 10 different knowledge fields 03Research areas: Knowledge Engineering Knowledge Media Knowledge Management 324PhDs and 296Masters in KEM
  5. 5. WHERE ARE WE CAME FROM?
  6. 6. THE STATE OF SANTA CATARINA
  7. 7. COPRODUCING IN ST&I
  8. 8. 2015 State Foundation of ST&I of Santa Catarina (FAPESC) challenges: • How to do the fifth ST&I State Meeting on ST&I (VCECTI)? • Engaging all ST&I players from all regions? • Creating content useful to state planning? • Making repeatable in upcoming state conferences? ST&I CHALLENGE The four previous CECTI were not based on citizen coproduction.
  9. 9. RESEARCH DEMAND Florianópolis 17/10/15 Itajaí 03/11/15 Jaraguá 29/10/15 Criciúma 27/10/15 Lages 17/10/15 Chapecó 22/10/15 Joinville 13/11/15 1. Make VCECTI based on contemporaneous public management principles; 2. Identify the perceptions of ST&I players about their regional ST&I systems; 3. Engage regional ST&I players (from all innovation sectors) in the coproduction of proposals to ST&I systems; 4. Coproduce a State ST&I plan to SC; 5. Reproduce the method in future ST&I conferences.
  10. 10. RESEARCH PROJECT Our research team: VCECTI required a team of senior researchers, PhD and master students to elaborate and apply a Framework. Researchers, Masters and PhD Students enrolled inVCECTI Research Project (2015) Local team: in each regional session, professors and students of the host organization invited the participants, and helped to organize the sessions and applied the dynamics.
  11. 11. COPRODUCTION Phase I (2015): Meetings in six regions of Santa Catarina. Phase II (2017): representatives from 27 organizations analyzed all 450 proposals and present an strategic map to STI SC state.
  12. 12. FACING THE CHALLENGESST&I Structural Dimensions ST&I Intellectual Capital We developed a Framework to promote coproduction of collective ST&I Perceptions and Proposals (Phase I), ST&I Strategic Actions and Goals (Phase I), all classified into ST&I Intellectual Capital Dimensions
  13. 13. 450 ST&I proposals were registered in all six regions of SC state. 1078 participants shared their perceptions about their regional ST&I systems and offered 1ST PHASE OUTCOMES
  14. 14. All 450 Proposals were classified into Intellectual Capital and Governance Dimensions of ST&I Systems ST&I AS IC AND GOVERNANCE
  15. 15. THE LEARNING OUTCOMES More Relational Capital (24%) More ST&I Inducers (21%) IC Capital Fpolis Chapecó Criciúma Jaraguá Itajaí Lages Average Human 11% 15% 18% 12% 15% 17% 15% Structural 13% 15% 18% 17% 11% 23% 16% Relational 14% 27% 21% 28% 28% 27% 24% Social 11% 14% 3% 10% 6% 12% 9% ST&I Governance 31% 12% 16% 12% 11% 7% 15% ST&I Inducers 19% 15% 25% 22% 30% 14% 21% Proposals 83 84 68 78 54 83 450 % Proposals 18% 19% 15% 17% 12% 18% In the State:
  16. 16. THE LEARNING OUTCOMES IC Capital Fpolis Chapecó Criciúma Jaraguá Itajaí Lages Average Human 11% 15% 18% 12% 15% 17% 15% Structural 13% 15% 18% 17% 11% 23% 16% Relational 14% 27% 21% 28% 28% 27% 24% Social 11% 14% 3% 10% 6% 12% 9% ST&I Governance 31% 12% 16% 12% 11% 7% 15% ST&I Inducers 19% 15% 25% 22% 30% 14% 21% Proposals 83 84 68 78 54 83 450 % Proposals 18% 19% 15% 17% 12% 18% Florianópolis wants more Governance (it is the state capital)
  17. 17. THE LEARNING OUTCOMES IC Capital Fpolis Chapecó Criciúma Jaraguá Itajaí Lages Average Human 11% 15% 18% 12% 15% 17% 15% Structural 13% 15% 18% 17% 11% 23% 16% Relational 14% 27% 21% 28% 28% 27% 24% Social 11% 14% 3% 10% 6% 12% 9% ST&I Governance 31% 12% 16% 12% 11% 7% 15% ST&I Inducers 19% 15% 25% 22% 30% 14% 21% Proposals 83 84 68 78 54 83 450 % Proposals 18% 19% 15% 17% 12% 18% want Relational Capital Chapecó Lages Jaraguá
  18. 18. Representatives from 27 ST&I Organizations from academy, business, government and civil society analyzed the proposals (demands) and created a ST&I Strategic Map (with goals and actions classified into IC dimensions). 2ND PHASE OUTCOMES 35 64 Strategic Goals Strategic Actions
  19. 19. FINAL REMARKS
  20. 20. IC APPROACH TO PUBLIC COPRODUCION Our Framework allows ST&I ecosystems to be collectively built as IC systems: ✓ Structural Capital ✓ Relational Capital ✓ Human Capital ✓ Social Capital 1080 ST&I individuals 27 ST&I Organizations
  21. 21. INNOVATIVE IC • Participation: IC Model to society participation • Collective intelligence: promote interaction between society and public players • Social control: coproduced strategic map can be built and followed by society • Tangibility: make public policies and investments tangible to society • Comparability: make regional innovation ecosystems cross-sectional and temporal comparable
  22. 22. PLANS TO THE FUTURE • ST&I Coproduction: there is need for a continuous evolution of the state strategic map in ST&I developed (implementation, governance, assessment, etc.).The next CECTI will have this plan as a starting point. • National and International applications: we are already cooperating in other innovation regions in Brazil (Bahia, Paraná) and Colombia (Cauca innovation ecosystem). • New IC Coproduction Frameworks: we have developed a Metaframework that allows the same IC approach to other complex social problems (ex. Public plans to sectors such as Turism, Securiy, Health, etc.).
  23. 23. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND ST&I GOVERNANCE BASED ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND SOCIAL COPRODUCTION Roberto Carlos dos Santos Pacheco – pacheco@egc.ufsc.br Paulo Mauricio Selig – selig@egc.ufsc.br Everton Ricardo do Nascimento – everton.nascimento@unemat.br Eduardo Giugliani – giugliani@pucrs.br The 4th Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital Excellence Awards
  24. 24. REFERENCES Bontis, N. (1998).“Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models”, Management decision,Vol. 36 No.2, pp.63-76. Denhardt, R. B. and Denhardt, J.V. (2011). The new public service: serving not steering. NewYork: M. E. Sharpe. Edvinsson,L. and Malone, M.S., 1997. Intellectual capital: realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower. Graf,W., Kramer, G., & Nicolescou,A. (2010). ComplexityThinking as a Meta-Framework for conflict transformation: In search of a paradigm and a methodology for aTransformative Culture of Peace. na. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business Press. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998).“Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage”. In Knowledge and social capital, pp. 119-157. Nascimento, Everton Ricardo. Coproduction Metaframework for Complex Environments to generate Strategic Supplies. DoctoralThesis. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2018. Salm, J. F. and Pacheco, R. CS (2017).“New Public Service through Coproduction”. In: The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Robert Frodeman; JulieThompson Klein and, Roberto Carlos Dos Santos Pacheco (Ed.). Oxford University Press. Sveiby, K. E. (1998).“Intellectual capital:Thinking ahead”. AUSTRALIAN CPA,Vol. 68, pp. 18-23. VCECTI (2016).V Conferência Estadual de Ciência,Tecnologia e Inovação de Santa Catarina: metodologia e resultados para o plano estadual de CTI. Pacheco, R.C.S., Selig, P.M., Zucco, C. (Ed). Florianópolis, Instituto Stela. VCECTI (2018). Mapa Estratégico de CTI para Santa Catarina: metodologia e resultados daVCECTI. Pacheco, R.C.S., Selig, P.M., Zucco, C.(Ed.). Florianópolis, Instituto Stela.

×