Why choose the topic of Lousy Leaders? Most of us say that we want to follow the Great Leaders, that we struggle to find Great Leaders with character, who care about people and their organizations. However, we say that those who are most prominent are the leaders who only support themselves and want to satiate hidden desires of power, acquisition, recognition, and accolades for themselves. One of the problems with Lousy Leaders is how they acquire their positions! Maybe accepting Lousy Leaders is part of a new standard in our new society. Society appears to support or create a level of leadership acceptance. Chosen leaders seem to replicate and be predicated on our society. Based on this idea, we are a society in turmoil and one of divisiveness. Do you think Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt or Churchill would thrive in this society? Do we, in actuality, support Great Leadership whose proponents exhibit visionary competence, integrity, morality, inclusive growth and development of followers, fairness, and humanistic care of others? Or, do we support the acceptance of political pandering and the desire to have some kind of tribal loyalty, even if it is to a Lousy Leader? In this age of emotional isolation brought about by over-reliance on devices, belonging to something, anything, gives people a group identity, the “us versus them” ideology.