Kesavananda bharati case ppt

KESAVANANDA
BHARATI CASE
(AIR 1973 SC 1461)
• Landmark judgement (precedent)
• 13 judges bench
• Gave birth to the concept of “BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE”
• Paved the way for struggle between parliament and judiciary
• Fight for absolute power in regards to amendment power of any provision of
the constitution by virtue of Article 368.
History of amending power of parliament
• Shankari Prasad v. UOI (AIR 1951 SC 458)
• Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1965 SC 845)
• IC Golaknath v. St. Of Punjab (AIR 1967 SC 1643)
Shankari Prasad v. UOI (AIR 1951 SC 458)
• 1st amendment challenged (Art 31 A and 31 B)
• Question on difference between ordinary legislative power and amending
constituent power.
• Held that Art 13 (2) did not affect amendments made under Art. 368.
Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1965 SC
845)
• 17th Amendment was challenged
• Held that amendment is valid
• Parliament can amend anything in the constitution according to procedure
laid down in Art.368.
IC Golaknath v. St. Of Punjab (AIR 1967 SC
1643)
• 1st Amendment, 4th and 17th amendment was challenged.
• S.C adopted a doctrine of prospective over ruling under which three
constitutional amendment continued to be valid.
• Held that parliament had no power to amend provision of part III.
• S.C also interpreted that amending power under Art. 368 is same as
legislative power under Art 248, entry 97 of 7th schedule (Union list). It is
therefore a ‘law’ for the purpose of Art. 13 (2).
Brief Facts:
• In 1970 Swami HH Sri Kesavananda Bharati, Senior head of a Hindu Mutt
situated in Edneer, a village in District of Kerala, challenged the Kerala
government's attempts, under two state land reform acts, to impose
restrictions on the management of its property.
• Swami filled his petition under Article 26, concerning the right to manage
religiously owned property without government interference.
• Major amendments to the Constitution (the 24th, 25th and 29th) had been
enacted by Indira Gandhi’s government through Parliament. All these
amendments were under challenge in Kesavananda Bharati case.
ISSUES
• Whether any limitation or restriction could be placed on the amending power of
parliament ?
• Validity of 24th 25th and 29th amendment of C.O.I ?
• Whether law word includes amendment ?
• Can parliament destroy and frame new constitution ?
• Is there any difference between ordinary legislative power and constituent power ?
• What exactly is basic structure doctrine ?
• Whether judicial review could be done away with ?
Amendments
• Many amendment brought about by parliament to override the controversial
judgements standing in the way of parliament and to uphold their power to
amend.
• 24th amendment
• 25th amendment
• 29th amendment
What is 24th Amendment
• passed in the year 1971
• Objective- to remove hindrance and difficulties created by the decision of S.C in the year
1967 in Golaknath Case.
• By way of amendment, parliament introduced the following provisions:
• Art 13(4)
• Amending the heading of Art 368
• Art 368 (1)
• President obligation to give assent to bill amending the constitution
• Art 368 (3)
What is 25th Amendment
• Passed in the year 1972.
• Art 31 Clause 2 amended
• Clause (2B) inserted in Art.31 after clause (2A)
• Art. 31 C inserted by way of this amendment
What is 29th Amendment
• Kerala Govt. faced practical difficulties and to overcome them amended
Kerala land Reform Act, 1963 through:
Kerala land Reform (Amendment) Act, 1969, and
Kerala land Reform (Amendment) Act, 1971
• Certain provision of the principal act, 1963 as amended were challenged in
H.C of Kerala and S.C. This posed as a threat to implementation of land
reforms in Kerala.
• 29th Amendment passed in the year 1972.
• 29th Amendment - include these amendment acts in 9th schedule to the
constitution.
• Protection under Article 31 B.
Art. 31 B & Ninth Schedule
• Ninth schedule and Art. 31 B complement each other.
• Art 31 B came into effect by way of 1st amendment act, 1951
• Art 31 B talks about protection given to all acts and regulations mentioned in
9th schedule nor any of the provision thereof shall be declared void, or ever
have to become void on grounds that such act and regulation takes away or
violate the F.R
• All acts in ninth schedule are provided immunity from judicial review,
overriding judgements, decree and order to the contrary, if any.
Kesavananda Bharti case (13 JB)
• 24th, 25th and 29th amendment challenged.
• Amendments held valid.
• Over- ruled IC Golaknath v. State of Punjab (11 JB)
• Held that though parliament had wide powers to amend, such powers were curtailed by
maintaining the basic spirit of constitution.
• The parliament could not snatch certain basic principles enshrined in the constitution.
• No absolute power – S.C gave a new concept of Basic structure doctrine. Parliament could
take away or amend F.R as long as it did not violate THE BASIC STRUCTURE.
What is Basic Structure Doctrine?
• Indian judicial principle
• The basic features of the Constitution have not been explicitly defined by the Judiciary.
• Basic feature is determined by the Court in each case that comes before it.
• The doctrine thus forms the basis of a limited power of the Supreme Court to review and
strike down constitutional amendments enacted by the Parliament which conflict with or
seek to alter this "basic structure" of the Constitution.
• Basic structure doctrine is referred as the basic spirit of constitution. It could find its roots
in the preamble.
• Preamble is a 85 words summary of constitution. It is the basic essence of constitution. The
objective of constitution lies in the preamble.
• Balance between F.R and DPSP
• Judicial Review also part of basic structure.
• Article 14 and 21 is also part of basic structure.
Indria Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narian
(AIR 1975 SC 2299)
• 39th amendment was challenged (Art 329 A clause 4)
• The amendment was made to the jurisdiction of all courts including S.C over
disputes related to elections involving the prime minister of India.
• Held that it is beyond the amending power of the parliament as it destroyed
the basic structure of the constitution.
• Judicial review part of basic structure – upheld the doctrine given in
Kesavananda Bharti case.
Basic Structure By J. YV Chandrachud in Indra
Nehru Gandhi Case
• Sovereign democratic republic states
• Equality of status and opportunity of an individuals
• Secularism and freedom of conscience and religion
• Rule of law
Minerva Mills v. UOI
(AIR 1980 SC 1789)
• Validity of 42nd amendment was challenged.
• S.C struck down clauses 4 & 5 of Art. 368
• It was ruled by the court that a limited amending power itself is a basic
feature of constitution of India.
• Art.31 C - 42nd amendment declared unconstitutional – which extended the
25th amendment – that is it replaced Art 39 b and c by all DPSP.
• Procedure describe by Art. 368 (2) is mandatory.
Conclusion
• Dictatorship v. Democracy.
• Restriction placed on power to amend, otherwise absolute power would lead
to dictatorship. Essential to uphold democratic values. Nothing can take away
the power of judicial review by courts.
• Parliament taking advantage of 9th schedule. Placing all laws that violate the
basic structure doctrine.
• The landmark judgement of Supreme Court in I.R.Coelho which was
delivered on January 11 2007 it is now well settled principle that any law
placed under Ninth Schedule after April 23 1973 are subject to scrutiny of
Court's if they violated fundamental rights and thus put the check on the
misuse of the provision of the Ninth Schedule by the legislative.
1 de 20

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

JUDICIAL REVIEW (Brief Notes)JUDICIAL REVIEW (Brief Notes)
JUDICIAL REVIEW (Brief Notes)sandhyakrish2
1.3K visualizações16 slides
Delegated legislationDelegated legislation
Delegated legislationReshma Suresh
65.8K visualizações12 slides
Delegated legislationDelegated legislation
Delegated legislationshahid ali makrani
32.5K visualizações13 slides

Mais procurados(20)

Code of civil procedure 1908 appealsCode of civil procedure 1908 appeals
Code of civil procedure 1908 appeals
Dr. Vikas Khakare20K visualizações
JUDICIAL REVIEW (Brief Notes)JUDICIAL REVIEW (Brief Notes)
JUDICIAL REVIEW (Brief Notes)
sandhyakrish21.3K visualizações
Delegated legislationDelegated legislation
Delegated legislation
Reshma Suresh65.8K visualizações
Delegated legislationDelegated legislation
Delegated legislation
shahid ali makrani32.5K visualizações
Article 23 - Right against exploitationArticle 23 - Right against exploitation
Article 23 - Right against exploitation
Hardik Mishra4K visualizações
PreamblePreamble
Preamble
Rahul Yadav3.2K visualizações
Public interest litigationPublic interest litigation
Public interest litigation
Altacit Global30.6K visualizações
Art 21Art 21
Art 21
vaibhavsonule5.9K visualizações
Kelson pure theoryKelson pure theory
Kelson pure theory
Rohitshrivastava596.7K visualizações
Basic Structure Doctrine of Indian  ConstitutionBasic Structure Doctrine of Indian  Constitution
Basic Structure Doctrine of Indian Constitution
Angelina Naorem17.1K visualizações
Theory of Basic Structure.pptxTheory of Basic Structure.pptx
Theory of Basic Structure.pptx
Jonika Lamba636 visualizações
Harmonius constructionHarmonius construction
Harmonius construction
Arun Bharti15.7K visualizações
Salient features of indian constitutions.Salient features of indian constitutions.
Salient features of indian constitutions.
Abrar Khan44.4K visualizações
Salient features of Indian constitution   Salient features of Indian constitution
Salient features of Indian constitution
Shivani Sharma14.3K visualizações
Appointment of sc judges –procedure in indiaAppointment of sc judges –procedure in india
Appointment of sc judges –procedure in india
Altacit Global9.1K visualizações
Emergency provisionsEmergency provisions
Emergency provisions
raviranjannlc124.4K visualizações
Anticipatory bailAnticipatory bail
Anticipatory bail
CS Bhuwan Taragi635 visualizações

Destaque(20)

ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case PresesntationADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case Presesntation
ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case Presesntation
Jaimin Joshi31.1K visualizações
Maneka Gandhi v Union of IndiaManeka Gandhi v Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v Union of India
Abhinandan Ray48.3K visualizações
Maneka Gandhi caseManeka Gandhi case
Maneka Gandhi case
Satya Ranjan Swain24.2K visualizações
9  basic structure of the constitution revisited9  basic structure of the constitution revisited
9 basic structure of the constitution revisited
judicialreform6.1K visualizações
Basic structure of indian constituion(1)Basic structure of indian constituion(1)
Basic structure of indian constituion(1)
Neha Dutta4.3K visualizações
Parliamentary governmentParliamentary government
Parliamentary government
Azam Khan44.6K visualizações
TEORI BAB 8TEORI BAB 8
TEORI BAB 8
Muhammad Fadli. SE,.343 visualizações
Gender jurisprudence and its context in IndiaGender jurisprudence and its context in India
Gender jurisprudence and its context in India
Shantanu Basu3.6K visualizações
Krovelnye raboty (1)Krovelnye raboty (1)
Krovelnye raboty (1)
metel_kova335 visualizações
З досвіду роботиЗ досвіду роботи
З досвіду роботи
ssherbak237 visualizações
Mark Guntrum ResumeMark Guntrum Resume
Mark Guntrum Resume
Mark Guntrum257 visualizações
Мой День Победы 2015г.Мой День Победы 2015г.
Мой День Победы 2015г.
Flyka271 visualizações
03 solo business solutions EN03 solo business solutions EN
03 solo business solutions EN
Bps Erp322 visualizações
Inli corporationInli corporation
Inli corporation
Inli corporation360 visualizações
NdryshimetNdryshimet
Ndryshimet
elsareus253 visualizações
Konstruktorskiy proektKonstruktorskiy proekt
Konstruktorskiy proekt
metel_kova346 visualizações
Untitled 1Untitled 1
Untitled 1
s1200143151 visualizações

Similar a Kesavananda bharati case ppt

Polity dpsp 4.2Polity dpsp 4.2
Polity dpsp 4.2Abhishek Kunwar
1.1K visualizações21 slides
INDIAN CONSTITUTION AMENDMENTINDIAN CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT
INDIAN CONSTITUTION AMENDMENTPramod Wagh
194 visualizações34 slides
Union territory and tribal councilsUnion territory and tribal councils
Union territory and tribal councilsShyam Rathod
1.2K visualizações27 slides

Similar a Kesavananda bharati case ppt(20)

Polity dpsp 4.2Polity dpsp 4.2
Polity dpsp 4.2
Abhishek Kunwar1.1K visualizações
303407_636834040199285090.pptx303407_636834040199285090.pptx
303407_636834040199285090.pptx
PRAGATHESWARANGUNASE12 visualizações
INDIAN CONSTITUTION AMENDMENTINDIAN CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT
INDIAN CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT
Pramod Wagh194 visualizações
Constitution of india fundamental rightsConstitution of india fundamental rights
Constitution of india fundamental rights
Nidhi Shukla185 visualizações
Union territory and tribal councilsUnion territory and tribal councils
Union territory and tribal councils
Shyam Rathod1.2K visualizações
Keshvananda Bharti Case...vs State of Kerala and Anr.Keshvananda Bharti Case...vs State of Kerala and Anr.
Keshvananda Bharti Case...vs State of Kerala and Anr.
LogicallyLegal412 visualizações
polity13BasicStructure.pptxpolity13BasicStructure.pptx
polity13BasicStructure.pptx
AnkitSingh36910618 visualizações
The case that saved indian democracy pgp t dayThe case that saved indian democracy pgp t day
The case that saved indian democracy pgp t day
PROF. PUTTU GURU PRASAD106 visualizações
Role of basic structure under indian constitutionRole of basic structure under indian constitution
Role of basic structure under indian constitution
Amit Ganguly240 visualizações
Limitation on constitutional amendementLimitation on constitutional amendement
Limitation on constitutional amendement
Rahul Gaur2K visualizações
Amendment of the Constitution.pptxAmendment of the Constitution.pptx
Amendment of the Constitution.pptx
ANEEZH H22 visualizações
24th amendment of Indian Constitution ppp24th amendment of Indian Constitution ppp
24th amendment of Indian Constitution ppp
Satheesh Kumar731 visualizações
Landmark cases on ConstitutionLandmark cases on Constitution
Landmark cases on Constitution
AyushiGupta433238 visualizações
Dr Mohan R Bolla Dr Mohan R Bolla
Dr Mohan R Bolla
Mohanrao Dr. Bolla340 visualizações
Tamizzudin's CaseTamizzudin's Case
Tamizzudin's Case
Fazal Akbar26.5K visualizações
Lecture 2   introduction to indian constitutionLecture 2   introduction to indian constitution
Lecture 2 introduction to indian constitution
amanbishla173 visualizações
amendmentofindianconstitution-201230105340.pdfamendmentofindianconstitution-201230105340.pdf
amendmentofindianconstitution-201230105340.pdf
NASIR14SPHL075 visualizações
A presentation on 8th amendment case A presentation on 8th amendment case
A presentation on 8th amendment case
Imtiaz Ahmed Sajal2.7K visualizações

Último(10)

H1B 2025 Predictions: Will There Be A H-1B Lottery Again?H1B 2025 Predictions: Will There Be A H-1B Lottery Again?
H1B 2025 Predictions: Will There Be A H-1B Lottery Again?
VisaPro Immigration Services LLC18 visualizações
5 Common H-1B Cap 2025 Filing Mistakes: How To Overcome Them?5 Common H-1B Cap 2025 Filing Mistakes: How To Overcome Them?
5 Common H-1B Cap 2025 Filing Mistakes: How To Overcome Them?
VisaPro Immigration Services LLC12 visualizações
Hiding From ACLN The Motley Fool.pdfHiding From ACLN The Motley Fool.pdf
Hiding From ACLN The Motley Fool.pdf
jamesmaredmond8 visualizações
Trademark-Case Study.pdfTrademark-Case Study.pdf
Trademark-Case Study.pdf
HetviJoshi46 visualizações
Megandco AestheticsMegandco Aesthetics
Megandco Aesthetics
dominiquebroder7810 visualizações
How is the Inheritance Divided in Italy?How is the Inheritance Divided in Italy?
How is the Inheritance Divided in Italy?
BridgeWest.eu5 visualizações
Right to Equality - Lecture PPTRight to Equality - Lecture PPT
Right to Equality - Lecture PPT
Prarthana 16 visualizações

Kesavananda bharati case ppt

  • 2. • Landmark judgement (precedent) • 13 judges bench • Gave birth to the concept of “BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE” • Paved the way for struggle between parliament and judiciary • Fight for absolute power in regards to amendment power of any provision of the constitution by virtue of Article 368.
  • 3. History of amending power of parliament • Shankari Prasad v. UOI (AIR 1951 SC 458) • Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1965 SC 845) • IC Golaknath v. St. Of Punjab (AIR 1967 SC 1643)
  • 4. Shankari Prasad v. UOI (AIR 1951 SC 458) • 1st amendment challenged (Art 31 A and 31 B) • Question on difference between ordinary legislative power and amending constituent power. • Held that Art 13 (2) did not affect amendments made under Art. 368.
  • 5. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1965 SC 845) • 17th Amendment was challenged • Held that amendment is valid • Parliament can amend anything in the constitution according to procedure laid down in Art.368.
  • 6. IC Golaknath v. St. Of Punjab (AIR 1967 SC 1643) • 1st Amendment, 4th and 17th amendment was challenged. • S.C adopted a doctrine of prospective over ruling under which three constitutional amendment continued to be valid. • Held that parliament had no power to amend provision of part III. • S.C also interpreted that amending power under Art. 368 is same as legislative power under Art 248, entry 97 of 7th schedule (Union list). It is therefore a ‘law’ for the purpose of Art. 13 (2).
  • 7. Brief Facts: • In 1970 Swami HH Sri Kesavananda Bharati, Senior head of a Hindu Mutt situated in Edneer, a village in District of Kerala, challenged the Kerala government's attempts, under two state land reform acts, to impose restrictions on the management of its property. • Swami filled his petition under Article 26, concerning the right to manage religiously owned property without government interference. • Major amendments to the Constitution (the 24th, 25th and 29th) had been enacted by Indira Gandhi’s government through Parliament. All these amendments were under challenge in Kesavananda Bharati case.
  • 8. ISSUES • Whether any limitation or restriction could be placed on the amending power of parliament ? • Validity of 24th 25th and 29th amendment of C.O.I ? • Whether law word includes amendment ? • Can parliament destroy and frame new constitution ? • Is there any difference between ordinary legislative power and constituent power ? • What exactly is basic structure doctrine ? • Whether judicial review could be done away with ?
  • 9. Amendments • Many amendment brought about by parliament to override the controversial judgements standing in the way of parliament and to uphold their power to amend. • 24th amendment • 25th amendment • 29th amendment
  • 10. What is 24th Amendment • passed in the year 1971 • Objective- to remove hindrance and difficulties created by the decision of S.C in the year 1967 in Golaknath Case. • By way of amendment, parliament introduced the following provisions: • Art 13(4) • Amending the heading of Art 368 • Art 368 (1) • President obligation to give assent to bill amending the constitution • Art 368 (3)
  • 11. What is 25th Amendment • Passed in the year 1972. • Art 31 Clause 2 amended • Clause (2B) inserted in Art.31 after clause (2A) • Art. 31 C inserted by way of this amendment
  • 12. What is 29th Amendment • Kerala Govt. faced practical difficulties and to overcome them amended Kerala land Reform Act, 1963 through: Kerala land Reform (Amendment) Act, 1969, and Kerala land Reform (Amendment) Act, 1971 • Certain provision of the principal act, 1963 as amended were challenged in H.C of Kerala and S.C. This posed as a threat to implementation of land reforms in Kerala. • 29th Amendment passed in the year 1972. • 29th Amendment - include these amendment acts in 9th schedule to the constitution. • Protection under Article 31 B.
  • 13. Art. 31 B & Ninth Schedule • Ninth schedule and Art. 31 B complement each other. • Art 31 B came into effect by way of 1st amendment act, 1951 • Art 31 B talks about protection given to all acts and regulations mentioned in 9th schedule nor any of the provision thereof shall be declared void, or ever have to become void on grounds that such act and regulation takes away or violate the F.R • All acts in ninth schedule are provided immunity from judicial review, overriding judgements, decree and order to the contrary, if any.
  • 14. Kesavananda Bharti case (13 JB) • 24th, 25th and 29th amendment challenged. • Amendments held valid. • Over- ruled IC Golaknath v. State of Punjab (11 JB) • Held that though parliament had wide powers to amend, such powers were curtailed by maintaining the basic spirit of constitution. • The parliament could not snatch certain basic principles enshrined in the constitution. • No absolute power – S.C gave a new concept of Basic structure doctrine. Parliament could take away or amend F.R as long as it did not violate THE BASIC STRUCTURE.
  • 15. What is Basic Structure Doctrine? • Indian judicial principle • The basic features of the Constitution have not been explicitly defined by the Judiciary. • Basic feature is determined by the Court in each case that comes before it. • The doctrine thus forms the basis of a limited power of the Supreme Court to review and strike down constitutional amendments enacted by the Parliament which conflict with or seek to alter this "basic structure" of the Constitution. • Basic structure doctrine is referred as the basic spirit of constitution. It could find its roots in the preamble. • Preamble is a 85 words summary of constitution. It is the basic essence of constitution. The objective of constitution lies in the preamble. • Balance between F.R and DPSP • Judicial Review also part of basic structure. • Article 14 and 21 is also part of basic structure.
  • 16. Indria Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narian (AIR 1975 SC 2299) • 39th amendment was challenged (Art 329 A clause 4) • The amendment was made to the jurisdiction of all courts including S.C over disputes related to elections involving the prime minister of India. • Held that it is beyond the amending power of the parliament as it destroyed the basic structure of the constitution. • Judicial review part of basic structure – upheld the doctrine given in Kesavananda Bharti case.
  • 17. Basic Structure By J. YV Chandrachud in Indra Nehru Gandhi Case • Sovereign democratic republic states • Equality of status and opportunity of an individuals • Secularism and freedom of conscience and religion • Rule of law
  • 18. Minerva Mills v. UOI (AIR 1980 SC 1789) • Validity of 42nd amendment was challenged. • S.C struck down clauses 4 & 5 of Art. 368 • It was ruled by the court that a limited amending power itself is a basic feature of constitution of India. • Art.31 C - 42nd amendment declared unconstitutional – which extended the 25th amendment – that is it replaced Art 39 b and c by all DPSP. • Procedure describe by Art. 368 (2) is mandatory.
  • 19. Conclusion • Dictatorship v. Democracy. • Restriction placed on power to amend, otherwise absolute power would lead to dictatorship. Essential to uphold democratic values. Nothing can take away the power of judicial review by courts.
  • 20. • Parliament taking advantage of 9th schedule. Placing all laws that violate the basic structure doctrine. • The landmark judgement of Supreme Court in I.R.Coelho which was delivered on January 11 2007 it is now well settled principle that any law placed under Ninth Schedule after April 23 1973 are subject to scrutiny of Court's if they violated fundamental rights and thus put the check on the misuse of the provision of the Ninth Schedule by the legislative.