1.
Warren court
By conor stellman

2.
Warren court
• The Warren Court left an unprecedented legacy of judicial activism in the
area of civil rights law as well as in the area of civil liberties—specifically,
the rights of the accused as addressed in
• Amendments 4 through 8. In the period from 1961 to 1969, the Warren
Court examined almost every aspect of the criminal justice system in the
United States, using the 14th Amendment to extend constitutional
protections to all courts in every State. This process became known as the
“nationalization” of the Bill of Rights. During those years, cases concerning
the right to legal counsel, confessions, searches, and the treatment of
juvenile criminals all appeared on the Court's docket.
• The Warren Court's revolution in the criminal justice system began with
the case of Mapp vs. Ohio, the first of several significant cases in which it
re-evaluated the role of the 14th Amendment as it applied to State
judicial systems.

3.
Terry vs. Ohio
• Talked about unreasonable search and seizure
• terry and two other men were observed by a
plain clothes policeman in what the officer
believed to be casing a job, a stick-up. The officer
stopped and frisked the three men, and found
weapons on two of them. Terry was convicted of
carrying a concealed weapon and sentenced to
three years in jail.

4.
Miranda vs. Arizona
• Case gave the rules for a car stop

5.
Brown vs. board of education
• After its decision in Brown I which declared racial
discrimination in public education
unconstitutional, the Court convened to issue the
directives which would help to implement its
newly announced Constitutional principle. Given
the embedded nature of racial discrimination in
public schools and the diverse circumstances
under which it had been practiced, the Court
requested further argument on the issue of relief