SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
GREEN SITE
Action 4 – Technology assessment
CONSORZIO VENEZIA RICERCHE – dott. Petra Scanferla
Action 4 – Technology assessment
Sub – Action 4.1: Technical preparation (CVR)
Sub – Action 4.2: Evaluation (ALLES)

• AIM: assessing the prototype developed in order to investigate its
treatment efficacy of SFE and SCWO processes under real conditions with
selected contaminated soil and sediment samples.

•EXPECTED RESULTS:
clean-up (extraction) efficiency should be higher than 90% (SFE) and over
90 % of efficiency in oxidation (SCWO) of target organic compounds;
improvement (by 30’-60’) of kinetic rates of extraction/oxidation of target
organic compounds;
end-products generated should be easily managed and discharged without
further expensive or complex treatment;
possibility to realize compact equipment, easy to transport and to install in
the intervention sites;
practical guidelines on optimal use of prototype.
Action 4 – Technology assessment
Starting points for the assessment

1. Definition of the target organic pollutants
A) characterizing the sediment contamination
of the forthcoming industrial channel that need
to be dredged…

“ISAP - Indagine sui sedimenti e
sulle acque dei canali di Porto
Marghera e delle aree lagunari
antistanti”
MAV/CVN - ICRAM

Primarily: PAHs
Action 4 – Technology assessment
Starting points for the assessment

1. Definition of the target organic pollutants
A) characterizing the sediment contamination
of the forthcoming industrial channel that need
to be dredged…
B) characterizing the contaminated soil and
groundwater of the industrial area

Primarily PAHs than
amines and
organochlorine

PAHs
Action 4 – Technology assessment
Starting points for the assessment
Chemical

PAH:
50 and 100 mg/kg d.m.

As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Ni
Pb
Zn
Tot. Hydrocabons
Total PAHs
PCBs
Chlor.Pesticides

Class B

Class C

Class C+

mg/Kg d.w.

2. Definition of the concentration
levels of the selected
contaminants in the samples
that will be used for the
evaluation of process
performance.

Class A

mg/Kg d.w.

mg/Kg d.w.

mg/Kg d.w.

15
1
20
40
0.5
45
45
200
30
1
0.01
0.001

25
5
100
50
2
50
100
400
500
10
0.2
0.02

50
20
500
400
10
150
500
3000
4000
20
2
0.5

>50
>20
>500
>400
>10
>150
>500
>3000
>4000
>20
>2
>0.5

DISPOSAL SITES:
A,B,C: in lagoon
C+: no contact with lagoon
Action 4 – Technology assessment
Protocols and Procedures

A. Definition of procedures for the collection and preparation of ad
hoc sediment samples to be used for the evaluation tests of the
processes.
B. Identification of the matrices (solid, liquid and gaseous) that need
to be characterized during the tests.
C. Definition of protocols :

 Starting run and blank test Protocol
 Processes optimization Protocol
Action 4 – Technology assessment
A. Collection and preparation of ad hoc sediment samples
IPA
Naftalene
Acenaftilene
Acenaftene
Fluorene
Fenantrene
Antracene
Fluorantene
Pirene
Crisene
Benzo(a)antracene
Benzo(b+j)fluorantene
Benzo(k)fluorantene
Benzo(a)pirene
Benzo(e)pirene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pirene
Dibenzo(a,h)antracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perilene
IPA TOTALI

mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.
mg/Kg s.s.

1194.7
39.4
403.0
361.3
1452.4
230.6
565.5
335.8
233.6
212.6
186.5
116.2
134.7
117.6
52.4
64.5
78.9
5779.6

Idrocarburi totali

mg/Kg s.s.

13807
Action 4 – Technology assessment
A. Collection and preparation of ad hoc sediment samples
SAMPLE A
PAH ≈ 50 ppm

α

β

γ

m g/kg d.w .

Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Fenentrene
Anthracene
Fluorantrene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (j) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene
Benzo (g, h, i) perylene
Dibenzo (a, i) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, e) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, l) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, h) pyrene
Total PAHs
Total hydrocarbons

1,900
0,540
4,700
8,900
14,700
1,750
8,700
5,400
1,730
1,490
1,100
0,480
0,540
0,700
0,940
0,272
0,490
0,161
0,470
0,049
0,047
0,076
0,012
55,0
53,0

1,800
0,430
3,800
5,600
13,100
1,580
8,200
4,800
1,660
1,390
1,030
0,570
0,440
0,670
0,910
0,263
0,460
0,152
0,450
0,045
0,046
0,071
0,013
48,0
48,2

Mean
conc.

st.dev.

1,700
0,457
4,000
6,400
13,367
1,667
8,033
4,800
1,737
1,500
1,100
0,520
0,527
0,710
0,960
0,278
0,500
0,165
0,487
0,049
0,050
0,080
0,013
49,3
54,4

α

β

γ

m g/kg d.w .

m g/kg d.w .

1,400
0,400
3,500
4,700
12,300
1,670
7,200
4,200
1,820
1,620
1,170
0,510
0,600
0,760
1,030
0,300
0,550
0,181
0,540
0,053
0,056
0,092
0,013
45,0
62,0

SAMPLE B
PAH ≈ 75 ppm

0,3
0,1
0,6
2,2
1,2
0,1
0,8
0,6
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,0
0,1
0,0
0,1
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
5,1
7,0

8 kg of sediment sample A

Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Fenentrene
Anthracene
Fluorantrene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (j) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene
Benzo (g, h, i) perylene
Dibenzo (a, i) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, e) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, l) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, h) pyrene
Total PAHs
Total hydrocarbons

2,700
0,710
6,500
8,700
22,800
2,900
15,000
8,900
3,000
2,640
1,740
0,960
0,760
1,140
1,560
0,460
0,820
0,280
0,790
0,073
0,079
0,132
0,021
83,0
122,0

2,600
0,650
5,400
7,200
19,800
2,800
11,800
6,900
2,800
2,570
1,770
0,840
0,780
1,110
1,550
0,460
0,810
0,264
0,790
0,081
0,079
0,131
0,023
71,0
130,0

Mean
conc.

st.dev.

m g/kg d.w .

2,900
0,570
5,700
7,000
20,500
2,510
10,500
6,100
2,400
2,100
1,550
0,730
0,630
0,970
1,290
0,380
0,690
0,225
0,700
0,080
0,081
0,131
0,024
68,0
141,0

2,733
0,643
5,867
7,633
21,033
2,737
12,433
7,300
2,733
2,437
1,687
0,843
0,723
1,073
1,467
0,433
0,773
0,256
0,760
0,078
0,080
0,131
0,023
74,0
131,0

8 kg of sediment sample B

0,2
0,1
0,6
0,9
1,6
0,2
2,3
1,4
0,3
0,3
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,2
0,0
0,1
0,0
0,1
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
7,9
9,5
Action 4 – Technology assessment
B. Identification of the matrices : SFE

Sediment
sampling point
after SFE

Sampling points for SFE

Stocks/extracs
sampling point
Action 4 – Technology assessment
B. Identification of the matrices

Sediment
sampling point
after SFE

Sampling points for SFE

Stocks/extracs
sampling point
Action 4 – Technology assessment
C. Protocols realization
Sediment sampling
after SFE
Action 4 – Technology assessment
C. Protocols realization
Stocks/extracs sampling
after SFE
Action 4 – Technology assessment
B. Identification of the matrices : SCWO

Emissions
control
after
SCWO

Sampling points for SCWO

Liquid sample
control after
SCWO
Action 4 – Technology assessment
C. Protocols realization
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SFE results
1^ Test
Mean conc.

Sample
treated

m g/kg d.w .

PAH ≈ 50 ppm

2^ Test

m g/k g d.w .

Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Fenentrene
Anthracene
Fluorantrene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (j) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene
Benzo (g, h, i) perylene
Dibenzo (a, i) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, e) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, l) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, h) pyrene
Total PAHs
Total hydrocarbons

1,700
0,457
4,000
6,400
13,367
1,667
8,033
4,800
1,737
1,500
1,100
0,520
0,527
0,710
0,960
0,278
0,500
0,165
0,487
0,049
0,050
0,080
0,013
49,3
54,4

Extraction
%

0,013
0,004
0,003
0,006
0,018
0,005
0,006
0,006
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
0,061
8,900

90 min.

Sample
treated

3^ Test

Extraction
%

m g/kg d.w .

99,2
99,1
99,9
99,9
99,9
99,7
99,9
99,9
100,0
100,0
100,0
99,9
99,9
99,9
99,9
99,8
99,9
99,7
99,9
99,0
99,0
99,4
96,1
99,9
83,6

0,006
<0,001
0,003
0,012
0,076
0,008
0,094
0,062
0,007
0,012
0,009
0,004
0,004
0,007
0,003
0,001
0,004
0,001
0,005
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
0,320
<5

90 min.

Sample
treated

4^ Test

Extraction
%

m g/kg d.w .

99,6
99,9
99,9
99,8
99,4
99,5
98,8
98,7
99,6
99,2
99,2
99,2
99,2
99,0
99,7
99,6
99,2
99,4
99,0
99,0
99,0
99,4
96,1
99,4
95,4

0,051
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
0,071
0,004
0,156
0,092
0,013
0,021
0,032
0,011
0,004
0,019
0,006
0,001
0,005
<0,001
0,010
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
0,490
5,000

60 min.

Sample
treated

Extraction
%

m g/k g d.w .

97,0
99,9
100,0
100,0
99,5
99,8
98,1
98,1
99,3
98,6
97,1
97,9
99,2
97,3
99,4
99,6
99,0
99,7
97,9
99,0
99,0
99,4
96,1
99,0
90,8

0,041
0,012
0,011
0,051
0,253
0,027
0,245
0,144
0,024
0,033
0,031
0,013
0,015
0,021
0,012
0,003
0,008
0,003
0,010
<0,001
0,002
0,002
<0,001
0,960
<5

60 min.

97,6
97,4
99,7
99,2
98,1
98,4
97,0
97,0
98,6
97,8
97,2
97,5
97,2
97,0
98,8
98,9
98,4
98,2
97,9
99,0
96,0
97,5
96,1
98,1
100,0
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SFE results
1^ Test
Mean conc.
m g/kg d.w .

PAH ≈ 75 ppm

Sample
treated
m g/kg d.w .

Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Fenentrene
Anthracene
Fluorantrene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (j) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene
Benzo (g, h, i) perylene
Dibenzo (a, i) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, e) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, l) pyrene
Dibenzo (a, h) pyrene
Total PAHs
Total hydrocarbons

2,733
0,643
5,867
7,633
21,033
2,737
12,433
7,300
2,733
2,437
1,687
0,843
0,723
1,073
1,467
0,433
0,773
0,256
0,760
0,078
0,080
0,131
0,023
74,0
131,0

0,013
0,005
0,009
0,054
0,211
0,025
0,174
0,107
0,025
0,032
0,023
0,009
0,010
0,017
0,009
0,003
0,007
0,002
0,008
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
<0,001
0,740
<5

Extraction
%

2^ Test
Sample
treated

3^ Test

Extraction
%

m g/kg d.w .

99,524
99,223
99,847
99,293
98,997
99,086
98,601
98,534
99,085
98,687
98,636
98,933
98,618
98,416
99,386
99,308
99,095
99,220
98,947
99,359
99,372
99,619
97,794
99,000
100,000

90 min.

0,068
0,010
0,023
0,087
0,170
0,016
0,320
0,207
0,034
0,046
0,056
0,024
0,021
0,039
0,019
0,006
0,015
0,004
0,019
<0,001
0,003
0,002
<0,001
1,190
6,700

90 min.

Sample
treated

4^ Test

Extraction
%

mg/kg d.w .

97,5
98,4
99,6
98,9
99,2
99,4
97,4
97,2
98,8
98,1
96,7
97,2
97,1
96,4
98,7
98,6
98,1
98,4
97,5
99,4
96,2
98,5
97,8
98,4
94,9

0,036
0,003
<0,001
<0,001
0,028
0,003
0,074
0,052
0,020
0,027
0,046
0,015
0,025
0,038
0,021
0,008
0,014
0,004
0,021
<0,001
0,001
0,001
<0,001
0,440
8,700

60 min.

Sample
treated

Extraction
%

m g/kg d.w .

98,7
99,5
100,0
100,0
99,9
99,9
99,4
99,3
99,3
98,9
97,3
98,2
96,5
96,5
98,6
98,2
98,2
98,4
97,2
99,4
98,7
99,2
97,8
99,4
93,4

0,041
0,011
0,022
0,098
0,380
0,039
0,300
0,186
0,032
0,045
0,030
0,012
0,017
0,023
0,014
0,004
0,011
0,004
0,014
<0,001
0,002
0,003
<0,001
1,290
16,100

60 min.

98,5
98,3
99,6
98,7
98,2
98,6
97,6
97,5
98,8
98,2
98,2
98,6
97,6
97,9
99,0
99,1
98,6
98,4
98,2
99,4
97,5
97,7
97,8
98,3
87,7
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SFE results
Σ PAH on the extracts from sample at 50 ppm

Σ PAH on the extracts from sample at 75 ppm
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SFE results

90%
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SFE results

C+
C
B

Class A
27 KWh

22 KWh
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SFE results
Capacity of SFE
pilot plant = 5 kg/h

B

Class A
27 KWh

22 KWh
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SCWO results
Extract treated in 50’:
14,35 Kg (~7% of organic contaminants)
Emission
limit
D.Lgs
152/2006

1st TEST

pH
Mineral oil
Conductivity
TDS
N nitrogen
Chlorides
Sulphates
Cu
Zn

mg/L
µS/cm
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L

Liquid output
during the
Liquid output (discharge
Blank sample - oxidation with
during the
into
Contaminated Liquid before
isopropyl
oxidation with surface
DM water
Extract
flame ignition alcohol (7,5%)
extract
w ater)
6,45
5,98
6,00
4,58
2,59
68400
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
5
18,3
63,8
29,5
343
<10
<10
<10
80
<0,1
<0,1
0,68
20
0,79
0,728
0,62
1200
11,1
0,75
21,6
1000
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,4
0,323
<0,05
0,448
0,5

99,99 %
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SCWO results
Extract treated in 53’:
17,1 Kg (~7% of organic contaminants)

Emission
limit
D.Lgs
152/2006

2nd TEST

pH
Mineral oil
Conductivity
TDS
N nitrogen
Chlorides
Sulphates
Cu
Zn

Capacity of SCWO
pilot plant = 20 kg/h

mg/L
µS/cm
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L

Liquid output
during the
Liquid output (discharge
Blank sample - oxidation with
during the
into
Contaminated Liquid before
isopropyl
oxidation with surface
DM water
Extract
flame ignition alcohol (7,5%)
extract
w ater)
6,45
6,14
5,65
3,71
2,21
66700
<0,1
<0,1
7,5
5
18,3
52,4
50,3
878
<10
<10
<10
80
0,139
<0,1
0,87
20
1,36
0,371
0,666
1200
5,26
5,15
93
1000
<0,01
<0,01
0,0136
0,4
2,74
0,43
0,394
0,5

99,99 %
Action 4 – Technology assessment
SCWO results
Air emission
during the
oxidation with
isopropyl
alcohol (7,5%)

2nd TEST

vapour water
TVOC

Air emission
during the
oxidation with
contaminated
extract

%

<1
8,4

Emission (com bustion
limit
plant w ith
D.Lgs
w aste
152/2006 incinerator)

<1

mg/Nmc

Emission
limit Dlgs
133/2005

9,3

O2

% v/v

9

4,7

CO2

% v/v

8,77

11,77

CO

mg/Nmc

156

14,2

100

NOx

mg/Nmc

<0,1

<0,1

200

SO2

mg/Nmc

4,2

1,5

200

single PAH congeners

ng/Nmc

<2

Σ PAH - upper bound

ng/Nmc

25

100.000

10.000

0,003
2,4

10.000
500.000

0,1

Σ PCDD+PCDF - upper bound ng/Nmc (I-TEQ)
ng/Nmc
Σ PCB - dioxin upper bound
Action 4 – Technology assessment
Conclusions
• EXPECTED RESULTS:
 extraction efficiency should be higher than 90% (SFE) and
over 90 % of efficiency in oxidation (SCWO) of target
organic compounds;
 improvement (by 30’-60’) of kinetic rates of
extraction/oxidation of target organic compounds;
 end-products generated should be easily managed and
discharged without further expensive or complex treatment;
 possibility to realize compact equipment, easy to transport
and to install in the intervention sites;
 practical guidelines on optimal use of prototype
GRAZIE PER L’ATTENZIONE
Contatto: sp.cvr@vegapark.ve.it
Le informazioni contenute nel presente documento possono essere riservate e sono, comunque, destinate
esclusivamente alla persona o all'ente sopraindicati. La diffusione, distribuzione e/o copia del documento
trasmesso da parte di qualsiasi soggetto diverso dal destinatario è proibita. Se avete ricevuto questo
documento per errore, Vi preghiamo di contattarci immediatamente. Grazie.

More Related Content

What's hot

Senior project report
Senior project reportSenior project report
Senior project reportBrett Kelley
 
Mustard design final presentation
Mustard design final presentationMustard design final presentation
Mustard design final presentationIan Melville
 
a1-cbiss Gas Detectors Brochure
a1-cbiss Gas Detectors Brochurea1-cbiss Gas Detectors Brochure
a1-cbiss Gas Detectors Brochurea1-cbiss
 
Waterborne engineering (csu) design report
Waterborne engineering (csu) design reportWaterborne engineering (csu) design report
Waterborne engineering (csu) design reportAshwin Dhanasekar
 
L17_Comparing measurement principles DLG1 AP
L17_Comparing measurement principles DLG1 APL17_Comparing measurement principles DLG1 AP
L17_Comparing measurement principles DLG1 APDaniel Gore
 
03 En Actiflo Softening
03 En Actiflo Softening03 En Actiflo Softening
03 En Actiflo Softeningguest10a8db
 
WBC 2012 Poster P-86 Optical vs. D and SV
WBC 2012 Poster P-86 Optical vs. D and SVWBC 2012 Poster P-86 Optical vs. D and SV
WBC 2012 Poster P-86 Optical vs. D and SVDaniel Gore
 
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516Daniel Eyde
 

What's hot (8)

Senior project report
Senior project reportSenior project report
Senior project report
 
Mustard design final presentation
Mustard design final presentationMustard design final presentation
Mustard design final presentation
 
a1-cbiss Gas Detectors Brochure
a1-cbiss Gas Detectors Brochurea1-cbiss Gas Detectors Brochure
a1-cbiss Gas Detectors Brochure
 
Waterborne engineering (csu) design report
Waterborne engineering (csu) design reportWaterborne engineering (csu) design report
Waterborne engineering (csu) design report
 
L17_Comparing measurement principles DLG1 AP
L17_Comparing measurement principles DLG1 APL17_Comparing measurement principles DLG1 AP
L17_Comparing measurement principles DLG1 AP
 
03 En Actiflo Softening
03 En Actiflo Softening03 En Actiflo Softening
03 En Actiflo Softening
 
WBC 2012 Poster P-86 Optical vs. D and SV
WBC 2012 Poster P-86 Optical vs. D and SVWBC 2012 Poster P-86 Optical vs. D and SV
WBC 2012 Poster P-86 Optical vs. D and SV
 
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
 

Similar to Green Site Project results

TREATMENT OF DISTILLERY EFFLUENT BY USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESS
TREATMENT OF DISTILLERY EFFLUENT BY USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSTREATMENT OF DISTILLERY EFFLUENT BY USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESS
TREATMENT OF DISTILLERY EFFLUENT BY USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSIRJET Journal
 
PhD presentation 3rd feb 2016
PhD presentation 3rd feb 2016PhD presentation 3rd feb 2016
PhD presentation 3rd feb 2016Anirban Kundu
 
Advanced oxidation processes to recover reverse osmosis cleaning waters
Advanced oxidation processes to recover reverse osmosis cleaning watersAdvanced oxidation processes to recover reverse osmosis cleaning waters
Advanced oxidation processes to recover reverse osmosis cleaning watersacciona
 
IRJET- Removal of Acetaminophen from Waste Water using Low Cost Adsorbent
IRJET- Removal of Acetaminophen from Waste Water using Low Cost AdsorbentIRJET- Removal of Acetaminophen from Waste Water using Low Cost Adsorbent
IRJET- Removal of Acetaminophen from Waste Water using Low Cost AdsorbentIRJET Journal
 
Thesis & design presentation
Thesis & design presentationThesis & design presentation
Thesis & design presentationSuman Sarkar
 
Production Optimization for OIL AND GAS.pptx
Production Optimization for OIL AND GAS.pptxProduction Optimization for OIL AND GAS.pptx
Production Optimization for OIL AND GAS.pptxopthse
 
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study RosignanoD1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study RosignanoDrKristineJung
 
IRJET- Filtration of Wastewater using Natural Adsorbents
IRJET-  	  Filtration of Wastewater using Natural AdsorbentsIRJET-  	  Filtration of Wastewater using Natural Adsorbents
IRJET- Filtration of Wastewater using Natural AdsorbentsIRJET Journal
 
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce cod in petroche...
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce cod in petroche...Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce cod in petroche...
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce cod in petroche...MOHAMED SAAD BALA
 
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce COD in petroche...
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce COD in petroche...Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce COD in petroche...
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce COD in petroche...Universiti Malaysia Pahang
 
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study RosignanoD1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study RosignanoDrKristineJung
 
Bobrov presentation ce4+ 2005
Bobrov presentation ce4+ 2005Bobrov presentation ce4+ 2005
Bobrov presentation ce4+ 2005BioTopAgro.SIC
 
Carbon analysis cod toc bod sensor-wtw
Carbon analysis cod toc bod sensor-wtwCarbon analysis cod toc bod sensor-wtw
Carbon analysis cod toc bod sensor-wtwENVIMART
 
Extraction kinetics of anthocyanins from wine lees: impact of microwave and s...
Extraction kinetics of anthocyanins from wine lees: impact of microwave and s...Extraction kinetics of anthocyanins from wine lees: impact of microwave and s...
Extraction kinetics of anthocyanins from wine lees: impact of microwave and s...World Bulk Wine Exhibition Amsterdam - Asia
 
Biochemical Process as a means to Control and Mitigate Industrial Wastewate...
Biochemical Process as a means  to Control and Mitigate  Industrial Wastewate...Biochemical Process as a means  to Control and Mitigate  Industrial Wastewate...
Biochemical Process as a means to Control and Mitigate Industrial Wastewate...Mohammad Dain Shah Munna
 
Performance Evaluation of ETP of Dairy industry with respect to Physico-chemi...
Performance Evaluation of ETP of Dairy industry with respect to Physico-chemi...Performance Evaluation of ETP of Dairy industry with respect to Physico-chemi...
Performance Evaluation of ETP of Dairy industry with respect to Physico-chemi...IRJET Journal
 

Similar to Green Site Project results (20)

NextGen Altenrhein, Switzerland
NextGen Altenrhein, SwitzerlandNextGen Altenrhein, Switzerland
NextGen Altenrhein, Switzerland
 
TREATMENT OF DISTILLERY EFFLUENT BY USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESS
TREATMENT OF DISTILLERY EFFLUENT BY USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSTREATMENT OF DISTILLERY EFFLUENT BY USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESS
TREATMENT OF DISTILLERY EFFLUENT BY USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESS
 
PhD presentation 3rd feb 2016
PhD presentation 3rd feb 2016PhD presentation 3rd feb 2016
PhD presentation 3rd feb 2016
 
Advanced oxidation processes to recover reverse osmosis cleaning waters
Advanced oxidation processes to recover reverse osmosis cleaning watersAdvanced oxidation processes to recover reverse osmosis cleaning waters
Advanced oxidation processes to recover reverse osmosis cleaning waters
 
IRJET- Removal of Acetaminophen from Waste Water using Low Cost Adsorbent
IRJET- Removal of Acetaminophen from Waste Water using Low Cost AdsorbentIRJET- Removal of Acetaminophen from Waste Water using Low Cost Adsorbent
IRJET- Removal of Acetaminophen from Waste Water using Low Cost Adsorbent
 
Thesis & design presentation
Thesis & design presentationThesis & design presentation
Thesis & design presentation
 
Production Optimization for OIL AND GAS.pptx
Production Optimization for OIL AND GAS.pptxProduction Optimization for OIL AND GAS.pptx
Production Optimization for OIL AND GAS.pptx
 
Tanja Radu
Tanja RaduTanja Radu
Tanja Radu
 
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study RosignanoD1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
 
IRJET- Filtration of Wastewater using Natural Adsorbents
IRJET-  	  Filtration of Wastewater using Natural AdsorbentsIRJET-  	  Filtration of Wastewater using Natural Adsorbents
IRJET- Filtration of Wastewater using Natural Adsorbents
 
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce cod in petroche...
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce cod in petroche...Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce cod in petroche...
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce cod in petroche...
 
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce COD in petroche...
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce COD in petroche...Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce COD in petroche...
Activation of hydrogen peroxide by chemical reagent to reduce COD in petroche...
 
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study RosignanoD1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
D1.2-Demonstrator Case Study Rosignano
 
Bobrov presentation ce4+ 2005
Bobrov presentation ce4+ 2005Bobrov presentation ce4+ 2005
Bobrov presentation ce4+ 2005
 
Carbon analysis cod toc bod sensor-wtw
Carbon analysis cod toc bod sensor-wtwCarbon analysis cod toc bod sensor-wtw
Carbon analysis cod toc bod sensor-wtw
 
Extraction kinetics of anthocyanins from wine lees: impact of microwave and s...
Extraction kinetics of anthocyanins from wine lees: impact of microwave and s...Extraction kinetics of anthocyanins from wine lees: impact of microwave and s...
Extraction kinetics of anthocyanins from wine lees: impact of microwave and s...
 
Biochemical Process as a means to Control and Mitigate Industrial Wastewate...
Biochemical Process as a means  to Control and Mitigate  Industrial Wastewate...Biochemical Process as a means  to Control and Mitigate  Industrial Wastewate...
Biochemical Process as a means to Control and Mitigate Industrial Wastewate...
 
Session 5d TISTR CRM Production
Session 5d TISTR CRM ProductionSession 5d TISTR CRM Production
Session 5d TISTR CRM Production
 
Performance Evaluation of ETP of Dairy industry with respect to Physico-chemi...
Performance Evaluation of ETP of Dairy industry with respect to Physico-chemi...Performance Evaluation of ETP of Dairy industry with respect to Physico-chemi...
Performance Evaluation of ETP of Dairy industry with respect to Physico-chemi...
 
Final presentation
Final presentationFinal presentation
Final presentation
 

Recently uploaded

SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024Lorenzo Miniero
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningLars Bell
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebUiPathCommunity
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsRizwan Syed
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii SoldatenkoFwdays
 
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxunit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxBkGupta21
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brandgvaughan
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Commit University
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxThe State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyCommit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyAlfredo García Lavilla
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanDatabarracks
 

Recently uploaded (20)

SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
 
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxunit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxThe State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
 
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyCommit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
 

Green Site Project results

  • 1. GREEN SITE Action 4 – Technology assessment CONSORZIO VENEZIA RICERCHE – dott. Petra Scanferla
  • 2. Action 4 – Technology assessment Sub – Action 4.1: Technical preparation (CVR) Sub – Action 4.2: Evaluation (ALLES) • AIM: assessing the prototype developed in order to investigate its treatment efficacy of SFE and SCWO processes under real conditions with selected contaminated soil and sediment samples. •EXPECTED RESULTS: clean-up (extraction) efficiency should be higher than 90% (SFE) and over 90 % of efficiency in oxidation (SCWO) of target organic compounds; improvement (by 30’-60’) of kinetic rates of extraction/oxidation of target organic compounds; end-products generated should be easily managed and discharged without further expensive or complex treatment; possibility to realize compact equipment, easy to transport and to install in the intervention sites; practical guidelines on optimal use of prototype.
  • 3. Action 4 – Technology assessment Starting points for the assessment 1. Definition of the target organic pollutants A) characterizing the sediment contamination of the forthcoming industrial channel that need to be dredged… “ISAP - Indagine sui sedimenti e sulle acque dei canali di Porto Marghera e delle aree lagunari antistanti” MAV/CVN - ICRAM Primarily: PAHs
  • 4. Action 4 – Technology assessment Starting points for the assessment 1. Definition of the target organic pollutants A) characterizing the sediment contamination of the forthcoming industrial channel that need to be dredged… B) characterizing the contaminated soil and groundwater of the industrial area Primarily PAHs than amines and organochlorine PAHs
  • 5. Action 4 – Technology assessment Starting points for the assessment Chemical PAH: 50 and 100 mg/kg d.m. As Cd Cr Cu Hg Ni Pb Zn Tot. Hydrocabons Total PAHs PCBs Chlor.Pesticides Class B Class C Class C+ mg/Kg d.w. 2. Definition of the concentration levels of the selected contaminants in the samples that will be used for the evaluation of process performance. Class A mg/Kg d.w. mg/Kg d.w. mg/Kg d.w. 15 1 20 40 0.5 45 45 200 30 1 0.01 0.001 25 5 100 50 2 50 100 400 500 10 0.2 0.02 50 20 500 400 10 150 500 3000 4000 20 2 0.5 >50 >20 >500 >400 >10 >150 >500 >3000 >4000 >20 >2 >0.5 DISPOSAL SITES: A,B,C: in lagoon C+: no contact with lagoon
  • 6. Action 4 – Technology assessment Protocols and Procedures A. Definition of procedures for the collection and preparation of ad hoc sediment samples to be used for the evaluation tests of the processes. B. Identification of the matrices (solid, liquid and gaseous) that need to be characterized during the tests. C. Definition of protocols :  Starting run and blank test Protocol  Processes optimization Protocol
  • 7. Action 4 – Technology assessment A. Collection and preparation of ad hoc sediment samples IPA Naftalene Acenaftilene Acenaftene Fluorene Fenantrene Antracene Fluorantene Pirene Crisene Benzo(a)antracene Benzo(b+j)fluorantene Benzo(k)fluorantene Benzo(a)pirene Benzo(e)pirene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pirene Dibenzo(a,h)antracene Benzo(g,h,i)perilene IPA TOTALI mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. mg/Kg s.s. 1194.7 39.4 403.0 361.3 1452.4 230.6 565.5 335.8 233.6 212.6 186.5 116.2 134.7 117.6 52.4 64.5 78.9 5779.6 Idrocarburi totali mg/Kg s.s. 13807
  • 8. Action 4 – Technology assessment A. Collection and preparation of ad hoc sediment samples SAMPLE A PAH ≈ 50 ppm α β γ m g/kg d.w . Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Fenentrene Anthracene Fluorantrene Pyrene Benzo (a) anthracene Chrysene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Benzo (j) fluoranthene Benzo (e) pyrene Benzo (a) pyrene Perylene Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene Benzo (g, h, i) perylene Dibenzo (a, i) pyrene Dibenzo (a, e) pyrene Dibenzo (a, l) pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) pyrene Total PAHs Total hydrocarbons 1,900 0,540 4,700 8,900 14,700 1,750 8,700 5,400 1,730 1,490 1,100 0,480 0,540 0,700 0,940 0,272 0,490 0,161 0,470 0,049 0,047 0,076 0,012 55,0 53,0 1,800 0,430 3,800 5,600 13,100 1,580 8,200 4,800 1,660 1,390 1,030 0,570 0,440 0,670 0,910 0,263 0,460 0,152 0,450 0,045 0,046 0,071 0,013 48,0 48,2 Mean conc. st.dev. 1,700 0,457 4,000 6,400 13,367 1,667 8,033 4,800 1,737 1,500 1,100 0,520 0,527 0,710 0,960 0,278 0,500 0,165 0,487 0,049 0,050 0,080 0,013 49,3 54,4 α β γ m g/kg d.w . m g/kg d.w . 1,400 0,400 3,500 4,700 12,300 1,670 7,200 4,200 1,820 1,620 1,170 0,510 0,600 0,760 1,030 0,300 0,550 0,181 0,540 0,053 0,056 0,092 0,013 45,0 62,0 SAMPLE B PAH ≈ 75 ppm 0,3 0,1 0,6 2,2 1,2 0,1 0,8 0,6 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,1 0,0 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,1 7,0 8 kg of sediment sample A Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Fenentrene Anthracene Fluorantrene Pyrene Benzo (a) anthracene Chrysene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Benzo (j) fluoranthene Benzo (e) pyrene Benzo (a) pyrene Perylene Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene Benzo (g, h, i) perylene Dibenzo (a, i) pyrene Dibenzo (a, e) pyrene Dibenzo (a, l) pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) pyrene Total PAHs Total hydrocarbons 2,700 0,710 6,500 8,700 22,800 2,900 15,000 8,900 3,000 2,640 1,740 0,960 0,760 1,140 1,560 0,460 0,820 0,280 0,790 0,073 0,079 0,132 0,021 83,0 122,0 2,600 0,650 5,400 7,200 19,800 2,800 11,800 6,900 2,800 2,570 1,770 0,840 0,780 1,110 1,550 0,460 0,810 0,264 0,790 0,081 0,079 0,131 0,023 71,0 130,0 Mean conc. st.dev. m g/kg d.w . 2,900 0,570 5,700 7,000 20,500 2,510 10,500 6,100 2,400 2,100 1,550 0,730 0,630 0,970 1,290 0,380 0,690 0,225 0,700 0,080 0,081 0,131 0,024 68,0 141,0 2,733 0,643 5,867 7,633 21,033 2,737 12,433 7,300 2,733 2,437 1,687 0,843 0,723 1,073 1,467 0,433 0,773 0,256 0,760 0,078 0,080 0,131 0,023 74,0 131,0 8 kg of sediment sample B 0,2 0,1 0,6 0,9 1,6 0,2 2,3 1,4 0,3 0,3 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,0 0,1 0,0 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,9 9,5
  • 9. Action 4 – Technology assessment B. Identification of the matrices : SFE Sediment sampling point after SFE Sampling points for SFE Stocks/extracs sampling point
  • 10. Action 4 – Technology assessment B. Identification of the matrices Sediment sampling point after SFE Sampling points for SFE Stocks/extracs sampling point
  • 11. Action 4 – Technology assessment C. Protocols realization Sediment sampling after SFE
  • 12. Action 4 – Technology assessment C. Protocols realization Stocks/extracs sampling after SFE
  • 13. Action 4 – Technology assessment B. Identification of the matrices : SCWO Emissions control after SCWO Sampling points for SCWO Liquid sample control after SCWO
  • 14. Action 4 – Technology assessment C. Protocols realization
  • 15. Action 4 – Technology assessment SFE results 1^ Test Mean conc. Sample treated m g/kg d.w . PAH ≈ 50 ppm 2^ Test m g/k g d.w . Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Fenentrene Anthracene Fluorantrene Pyrene Benzo (a) anthracene Chrysene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Benzo (j) fluoranthene Benzo (e) pyrene Benzo (a) pyrene Perylene Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene Benzo (g, h, i) perylene Dibenzo (a, i) pyrene Dibenzo (a, e) pyrene Dibenzo (a, l) pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) pyrene Total PAHs Total hydrocarbons 1,700 0,457 4,000 6,400 13,367 1,667 8,033 4,800 1,737 1,500 1,100 0,520 0,527 0,710 0,960 0,278 0,500 0,165 0,487 0,049 0,050 0,080 0,013 49,3 54,4 Extraction % 0,013 0,004 0,003 0,006 0,018 0,005 0,006 0,006 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 0,061 8,900 90 min. Sample treated 3^ Test Extraction % m g/kg d.w . 99,2 99,1 99,9 99,9 99,9 99,7 99,9 99,9 100,0 100,0 100,0 99,9 99,9 99,9 99,9 99,8 99,9 99,7 99,9 99,0 99,0 99,4 96,1 99,9 83,6 0,006 <0,001 0,003 0,012 0,076 0,008 0,094 0,062 0,007 0,012 0,009 0,004 0,004 0,007 0,003 0,001 0,004 0,001 0,005 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 0,320 <5 90 min. Sample treated 4^ Test Extraction % m g/kg d.w . 99,6 99,9 99,9 99,8 99,4 99,5 98,8 98,7 99,6 99,2 99,2 99,2 99,2 99,0 99,7 99,6 99,2 99,4 99,0 99,0 99,0 99,4 96,1 99,4 95,4 0,051 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 0,071 0,004 0,156 0,092 0,013 0,021 0,032 0,011 0,004 0,019 0,006 0,001 0,005 <0,001 0,010 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 0,490 5,000 60 min. Sample treated Extraction % m g/k g d.w . 97,0 99,9 100,0 100,0 99,5 99,8 98,1 98,1 99,3 98,6 97,1 97,9 99,2 97,3 99,4 99,6 99,0 99,7 97,9 99,0 99,0 99,4 96,1 99,0 90,8 0,041 0,012 0,011 0,051 0,253 0,027 0,245 0,144 0,024 0,033 0,031 0,013 0,015 0,021 0,012 0,003 0,008 0,003 0,010 <0,001 0,002 0,002 <0,001 0,960 <5 60 min. 97,6 97,4 99,7 99,2 98,1 98,4 97,0 97,0 98,6 97,8 97,2 97,5 97,2 97,0 98,8 98,9 98,4 98,2 97,9 99,0 96,0 97,5 96,1 98,1 100,0
  • 16. Action 4 – Technology assessment SFE results 1^ Test Mean conc. m g/kg d.w . PAH ≈ 75 ppm Sample treated m g/kg d.w . Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Fenentrene Anthracene Fluorantrene Pyrene Benzo (a) anthracene Chrysene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Benzo (j) fluoranthene Benzo (e) pyrene Benzo (a) pyrene Perylene Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene Benzo (g, h, i) perylene Dibenzo (a, i) pyrene Dibenzo (a, e) pyrene Dibenzo (a, l) pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) pyrene Total PAHs Total hydrocarbons 2,733 0,643 5,867 7,633 21,033 2,737 12,433 7,300 2,733 2,437 1,687 0,843 0,723 1,073 1,467 0,433 0,773 0,256 0,760 0,078 0,080 0,131 0,023 74,0 131,0 0,013 0,005 0,009 0,054 0,211 0,025 0,174 0,107 0,025 0,032 0,023 0,009 0,010 0,017 0,009 0,003 0,007 0,002 0,008 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 0,740 <5 Extraction % 2^ Test Sample treated 3^ Test Extraction % m g/kg d.w . 99,524 99,223 99,847 99,293 98,997 99,086 98,601 98,534 99,085 98,687 98,636 98,933 98,618 98,416 99,386 99,308 99,095 99,220 98,947 99,359 99,372 99,619 97,794 99,000 100,000 90 min. 0,068 0,010 0,023 0,087 0,170 0,016 0,320 0,207 0,034 0,046 0,056 0,024 0,021 0,039 0,019 0,006 0,015 0,004 0,019 <0,001 0,003 0,002 <0,001 1,190 6,700 90 min. Sample treated 4^ Test Extraction % mg/kg d.w . 97,5 98,4 99,6 98,9 99,2 99,4 97,4 97,2 98,8 98,1 96,7 97,2 97,1 96,4 98,7 98,6 98,1 98,4 97,5 99,4 96,2 98,5 97,8 98,4 94,9 0,036 0,003 <0,001 <0,001 0,028 0,003 0,074 0,052 0,020 0,027 0,046 0,015 0,025 0,038 0,021 0,008 0,014 0,004 0,021 <0,001 0,001 0,001 <0,001 0,440 8,700 60 min. Sample treated Extraction % m g/kg d.w . 98,7 99,5 100,0 100,0 99,9 99,9 99,4 99,3 99,3 98,9 97,3 98,2 96,5 96,5 98,6 98,2 98,2 98,4 97,2 99,4 98,7 99,2 97,8 99,4 93,4 0,041 0,011 0,022 0,098 0,380 0,039 0,300 0,186 0,032 0,045 0,030 0,012 0,017 0,023 0,014 0,004 0,011 0,004 0,014 <0,001 0,002 0,003 <0,001 1,290 16,100 60 min. 98,5 98,3 99,6 98,7 98,2 98,6 97,6 97,5 98,8 98,2 98,2 98,6 97,6 97,9 99,0 99,1 98,6 98,4 98,2 99,4 97,5 97,7 97,8 98,3 87,7
  • 17. Action 4 – Technology assessment SFE results Σ PAH on the extracts from sample at 50 ppm Σ PAH on the extracts from sample at 75 ppm
  • 18. Action 4 – Technology assessment SFE results 90%
  • 19. Action 4 – Technology assessment SFE results C+ C B Class A 27 KWh 22 KWh
  • 20. Action 4 – Technology assessment SFE results Capacity of SFE pilot plant = 5 kg/h B Class A 27 KWh 22 KWh
  • 21. Action 4 – Technology assessment SCWO results Extract treated in 50’: 14,35 Kg (~7% of organic contaminants) Emission limit D.Lgs 152/2006 1st TEST pH Mineral oil Conductivity TDS N nitrogen Chlorides Sulphates Cu Zn mg/L µS/cm mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L Liquid output during the Liquid output (discharge Blank sample - oxidation with during the into Contaminated Liquid before isopropyl oxidation with surface DM water Extract flame ignition alcohol (7,5%) extract w ater) 6,45 5,98 6,00 4,58 2,59 68400 <0,1 <0,1 <0,1 5 18,3 63,8 29,5 343 <10 <10 <10 80 <0,1 <0,1 0,68 20 0,79 0,728 0,62 1200 11,1 0,75 21,6 1000 <0,01 <0,01 <0,01 0,4 0,323 <0,05 0,448 0,5 99,99 %
  • 22. Action 4 – Technology assessment SCWO results Extract treated in 53’: 17,1 Kg (~7% of organic contaminants) Emission limit D.Lgs 152/2006 2nd TEST pH Mineral oil Conductivity TDS N nitrogen Chlorides Sulphates Cu Zn Capacity of SCWO pilot plant = 20 kg/h mg/L µS/cm mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L Liquid output during the Liquid output (discharge Blank sample - oxidation with during the into Contaminated Liquid before isopropyl oxidation with surface DM water Extract flame ignition alcohol (7,5%) extract w ater) 6,45 6,14 5,65 3,71 2,21 66700 <0,1 <0,1 7,5 5 18,3 52,4 50,3 878 <10 <10 <10 80 0,139 <0,1 0,87 20 1,36 0,371 0,666 1200 5,26 5,15 93 1000 <0,01 <0,01 0,0136 0,4 2,74 0,43 0,394 0,5 99,99 %
  • 23. Action 4 – Technology assessment SCWO results Air emission during the oxidation with isopropyl alcohol (7,5%) 2nd TEST vapour water TVOC Air emission during the oxidation with contaminated extract % <1 8,4 Emission (com bustion limit plant w ith D.Lgs w aste 152/2006 incinerator) <1 mg/Nmc Emission limit Dlgs 133/2005 9,3 O2 % v/v 9 4,7 CO2 % v/v 8,77 11,77 CO mg/Nmc 156 14,2 100 NOx mg/Nmc <0,1 <0,1 200 SO2 mg/Nmc 4,2 1,5 200 single PAH congeners ng/Nmc <2 Σ PAH - upper bound ng/Nmc 25 100.000 10.000 0,003 2,4 10.000 500.000 0,1 Σ PCDD+PCDF - upper bound ng/Nmc (I-TEQ) ng/Nmc Σ PCB - dioxin upper bound
  • 24. Action 4 – Technology assessment Conclusions • EXPECTED RESULTS:  extraction efficiency should be higher than 90% (SFE) and over 90 % of efficiency in oxidation (SCWO) of target organic compounds;  improvement (by 30’-60’) of kinetic rates of extraction/oxidation of target organic compounds;  end-products generated should be easily managed and discharged without further expensive or complex treatment;  possibility to realize compact equipment, easy to transport and to install in the intervention sites;  practical guidelines on optimal use of prototype
  • 25. GRAZIE PER L’ATTENZIONE Contatto: sp.cvr@vegapark.ve.it Le informazioni contenute nel presente documento possono essere riservate e sono, comunque, destinate esclusivamente alla persona o all'ente sopraindicati. La diffusione, distribuzione e/o copia del documento trasmesso da parte di qualsiasi soggetto diverso dal destinatario è proibita. Se avete ricevuto questo documento per errore, Vi preghiamo di contattarci immediatamente. Grazie.

Editor's Notes

  1. We expect to demonstrate that samples (e.g. contaminated soils and sediments) tested in prototype will have a very low amount of PAH, hydrocarbons and halogenated contaminants (e.g. PCB), after the treatment trains. The expected clean-up efficiency should be higher than 95%; every by– and end-products generated should be easily managed and discharged without further expensive or complex treatment, and the oxidation should not cause unexpected emergency stop or need for extra maintenance. Expected results are also practical guidelines and report on optimal use of prototype.
  2. CVR is also involved in EU-funded project EURODEMO (European Co-ordination Action for Demonstration of Efficient Soil and Groundwater Remediation; http://www.eurodemo.info/) focusing on technology demonstration in the field of soil and groundwater remediation. Finally, CVR has experience in technologies validation (Scanferla P. et al. 2009. An Innovative Stabilization/Solidification Treatment for Contaminated Soil Remediation: the Murano (Venice, Italy) Demonstration Project. Journal of Soils and Sediments 9: 229-236).   CVR is also involved in EU-funded project EURODEMO (European Co-ordination Action for Demonstration of Efficient Soil and Groundwater Remediation; http://www.eurodemo.info/) focusing on technology demonstration in the field of soil and groundwater remediation. Finally, CVR has experience in technologies validation (Scanferla P. et al. 2009. An Innovative Stabilization/Solidification Treatment for Contaminated Soil Remediation: the Murano (Venice, Italy) Demonstration Project. Journal of Soils and Sediments 9: 229-236).  
  3. Cvr is the leader of action 4 another benificiary is ALLES
  4. Cvr is the leader of action 4 another benificiary is ALLES
  5. Cvr is the leader of action 4 another benificiary is ALLES
  6. Cvr is the leader of action 4 another benificiary is ALLES
  7. Cvr is the leader of action 4 another benificiary is ALLES