O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.
Open Science:
Some Possible Actions
by University Leaders on
Behalf of Researchers
Philip E. Bourne, PhD, FACMI
Associate ...
My Definition of Open
Science…
• The provision in sustainable
resources of the products of
research (data, software,
reage...
The State of Play
• Open science practices are growing through
desire and through funders and publishers
actions (the leve...
4
1. Encourage Publishing
in OA Journals – More
Citations – More Grants
(?)
5
mean citation rate of OA articles divided by mean citation rate of non-OA articles
Open Access Articles Get More Citations...
2. Encourage Preprints –
Earlier access to work
benefits young
researchers and increases
exposure and does not
preclude pu...
Preprint servers and repositories accepting preprints
8
3. Encourage researchers
to look for open science
opportunities
9
Funding for open research, training, and advocacy
10
4. Encourage researchers
to be aware of existing
policies
11
Increase in open access policies over last decade
• open access policies registered in ROARMAP (roarmap.eprints.org)
• fig...
5. Post previously
published articles in a
public repository
13
6. Encourage the
preregistration of studies
14
7. Encourage the
deposition of data,
software, reagents etc…
Citation is coming!
15
In his 2012 book Open Access, Peter Suber summed it up best:
“[OA] increases a work’s visibility, retrievability,
audience...
Backpocket
17
Preprint servers and repositories accepting preprints
18
Próximos SlideShares
Carregando em…5
×

Open Science: Some Possible Actions by University Leaders on Behalf of Researchers

604 visualizações

Publicada em

Presented at the Association of Public Land Grant Universities (APLU) Council on Research (CoR) meeting, August 1, 2016, Morgantown, West Virginia

Publicada em: Educação
  • Seja o primeiro a comentar

  • Seja a primeira pessoa a gostar disto

Open Science: Some Possible Actions by University Leaders on Behalf of Researchers

  1. 1. Open Science: Some Possible Actions by University Leaders on Behalf of Researchers Philip E. Bourne, PhD, FACMI Associate Director for Data Science http://www.slideshare.net/pebourne Thanks to Erin McKiernan APLU CoR, August 1, 2016 1
  2. 2. My Definition of Open Science… • The provision in sustainable resources of the products of research (data, software, reagents, publications etc.) at no cost to all, with suitable attribution and compliant with any restrictions associated with the research. 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_license
  3. 3. The State of Play • Open science practices are growing through desire and through funders and publishers actions (the levers) • Widespread adoption of open science is not yet achieved • Researchers are uncertain about how sharing their work will affect their careers … 3
  4. 4. 4
  5. 5. 1. Encourage Publishing in OA Journals – More Citations – More Grants (?) 5
  6. 6. mean citation rate of OA articles divided by mean citation rate of non-OA articles Open Access Articles Get More Citations 6 https://elifesciences.org/content/5/e16800%20
  7. 7. 2. Encourage Preprints – Earlier access to work benefits young researchers and increases exposure and does not preclude publishing formally 7
  8. 8. Preprint servers and repositories accepting preprints 8
  9. 9. 3. Encourage researchers to look for open science opportunities 9
  10. 10. Funding for open research, training, and advocacy 10
  11. 11. 4. Encourage researchers to be aware of existing policies 11
  12. 12. Increase in open access policies over last decade • open access policies registered in ROARMAP (roarmap.eprints.org) • figure used with permission from Stevan Harnad12
  13. 13. 5. Post previously published articles in a public repository 13
  14. 14. 6. Encourage the preregistration of studies 14
  15. 15. 7. Encourage the deposition of data, software, reagents etc… Citation is coming! 15
  16. 16. In his 2012 book Open Access, Peter Suber summed it up best: “[OA] increases a work’s visibility, retrievability, audience, usage, and citations, which all convert to career building. For publishing scholars, it would be a bargain even if it were costly, difficult, and time- consuming. But...it’s not costly, not difficult, and not time-consuming.” Suber P. 2012. Open Access. MIT Press. http://bit.ly/oa-book 16
  17. 17. Backpocket 17
  18. 18. Preprint servers and repositories accepting preprints 18

×