"7-S's for Success" Framework- Key Success Factors for Program Success-(From Provider perspective)

O
Seven Key Factors for Program
Success
(the Provider perspective)
 Pat Schambach
 Partner, Schambach &Williams
Consulting
 Pat.Schambach@gmail.com
 571-218-9787
<PROGRAM CLIENT NAME>
“XYZ” Program - Contract Overview
PM: John Smith
Reporting Business Unit <Business Unit name>
Contract Value/Funded
Value
$314.2 Million (6-month Base Period plus 6 one-year Option Periods)
> Base Period $18.0 Million
> Option Year 1 $88.5 Million
> Funded Value $106.5 Million
Contract Scope Modernization of XYZ agency infrastructure. The “to be” environment is a SOA-based
architecture using Oracle product suites. Project involves retiring legacy system and
migrating functionality into a service based operation. The work is divided into 14
Task Groups:
TG1: Management and Administration; TG2 Enterprise Architecture; TG3-6 New
System Development; TG7-10 Steady State Operations and Maintenance; TG12-13
Enhancements to Existing Systems; and TG14 Inquiry Systems
Contract Term Start/End 11/08/2010 – 5/07/2017 including all options
> Option Year 1 5/08/2011 – 5/07/2012
> Option Year 2 5/08/2012 – 5/07/2013
Client Names Client PM: <name> CO PM: <name> COTR PM: <name>
Contract Payment Term Cost Basis : monthly for costs incurred
Award Fee : at completion of option year (booking at 85%)
Contract Type & Vehicle Cost Plus Award Fee > 0% Base Fee; 7.5% Award Fee Pool
Contract Vehicle <contract vehicle name>
Team Members <list subcontractors>
> Work Share Objectives = ABC Corp. – 16% and DEF Corp – 13%
1. Contracts
Funding B↑
Scope G↓
Deliverable Acceptance Y↑
CO Satisfaction R↓
Prime Contractor
Satisfaction N/A
Contractual Documents
Signed B
6. Staffing
Staffing to Plan B↑
Morale G
Threat to Coverage G
5. Marketing
Current Work Growth G
Same Client New Work Y
New Client New Work R↓
2. Management
Prime/Sub Ratio B
SB/SDB Goals N/A
CPAR/Customer
Satisfaction Status B
Date of Survey DATE
<PROGRAM CLIENT NAME>
“XYZ Program” - Balanced Scorecard for <Month/Year>
3. Financials
Budget (Client) B↑
Revenue (Ours) G
Margin % Y↓
Operating Income R
Days Sales Outstanding G↑
Earned Value N/A
4. Innovation
Ideas & Resources B
7. Project
Execution
Progress/Schedule G
Key Client or Our
Management Changes Y↑
Conditions: Facilities &
Environmental R↓
Risks R
Quality Benchmark
Achievement CMMI
COTR Satisfaction Y
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
<Program Title> Overview/Recap
Key
Milestones
Status
•Our team is providing significant SME
support to SMS
•Our “reach-back” has helped client with
the LSI startup; preparation for
Integrated Baseline Review (IBR), June
2012
•HCPS resources realigned to LSI
Top Issues
• Revised FY2013 margin estimate; higher % compared to bid
rates
• Delays in establishing subcontracts; process issue (non-personnel
issue); impact to billable T&M revenue; (May - $30K)
• Proposed Architecture (.NET/nServiceBus) may not support
planned system transaction volume (7000 claims per day). Lead
Solution Architect is working with team to resolve.
Accomplishments
• Supported IBR completion & delivery
(Major Milestone)
• Project Schedule – Lifecycle
• System Architecture
Assessment (Interim
Assessment)
Key
Milestones
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
Key
Milestones
20132012
SIT
Training
DIACAP
Go-Live
DSO
Nego 12.7 Staffing to Plan--need 1 FTE Plexis Technical
Oppor 10.4 Supplier--delay in subcontract
Book 11.0 Acquisition -- Planned Move of staff to LSI
Supplier
Status
Program
Acquisition
Stability
Margin % Focus
Technical
Progress
Cost
(CPI)
Schedule
(SPI)
CPAR /
Customer
Satisfaction
Status
Staffing to
Plan %
GG 1.02 0.98 G 0.9 YG
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
Blue – Better than Planned Green – As Planned Yellow – Potential Problem
Red – Definite Problem N/A – Not Applicable
PM’s “Return To Green” (RTG) Plan
Schedule G
Schedule will need to be revisited
after Arch. Assessment is
complete.
G
Margin R
Delayed revenue ($35K) due to
charge code availability; ($30K
due to delays in Sub-K
agreement tenders)
Opportunities for overtime will
help offset lost Sub-K labor
(JUN); Charge code issue
corrected for JUN (July PMR);
11.1% 90 Day Mark
DPM
G Jun
DSO G G
Customer Satisfaction B
CSC cited for efforts in IBR
assistance; knowledge/team G
Staffing to Plan Y
Staffing is in line with revised
SMS expectations. Delayed
revenue for two months; make up
in August/September
Need stronger RECRUITING
efforts; current sourcing effort
not productive for DL
Bill Y Aug
Suppliers Y
Delays associated with
subcontract agreements setup
tasks (ITManna, ArchSolut,
NetVisions).
Master IDIQ is needed or
setup prior to receipt of the
STO. (Requires Indirect Labor
Charge/Risk)
Dave G Jun
Acquisition Stability G G
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
• Contract Value $841.2M
• Exercised Price $463.8M
• Funded Value $452.8M
• DSO (YTD xxx 2012) 85.4 days
<Program Title> Financials
• Billed - awaiting payment $2.6M
– Current $292K; 31-60 days $2M; 61-90 days $288K
– $393.6M Paid ITD
• Unbilled Balance $19.6M
• DSO (Planned / Actual)
$ Millions
$ Millions
CURRENT MONTH YTD Full Year
BUDGET ACTUAL DELTA BUDGET ACTUAL DELTA BUDGET ACTUAL DELTA
Revenue
Operating Income
Margin
INCEPTION TO DATE
BUDGET ACTUAL DELTA EAC
Revenue
Operating Income
Margin
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
<Program Title> Staffing
• Staffing: Budget vs. Actual
– Variance due to:
• Xxxxxxx
• Yyyyyyy
• Zzzzzzz
– # Our FTEs
– # Subcontractor FTEs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
March April May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Baseline Forecast Actuals
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
Detailed Background Slides
Sub-Category Status Notes
Funding
Blue↑
<State the amount and percentage funded. >
Scope
Green↓
<Has the program/project performed work that is not in the
currently approved baseline plan and has not been subject to
formal change control?>
<Provide any additional comments on scope creep or expectations
of the client beyond what was bid.>
Note: A description of the project is not required since it is provided
on the previous page.
Note: If yellow or red, identify as “Risk” under Project Execution.
Deliverable Acceptance
Yellow↑
<Identify any deliverables accepted within the past month or those
being currently evaluated by the client.>
< Address any negative indications (verbal, e-mail, letter, rejected
deliverable, etc.) received from your client.>
CO Satisfaction
Red↓ <Use PM’s best judgment.>
Prime Contractor
Satisfaction
N/A
< If applicable. Use PM’s best judgment>
Contractual Documents
Signed
Blue
<Are all contractual documents (MSA, Statements of Work,
Program Definitions, Change Orders, etc.) signed by the client?>
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
<Program Title> Contracts
Sub-Category Status Notes
Budget (Client)
Blue↑
<Is the project within budget? Is the current “burn rate” expected to cover
project personnel through the POP?>
<Has the program/project exceeded, or is forecast to exceed, budget/cost
estimates by more than 5% against the currently approved baseline plan?>
Revenue (Ours)
Green
<“See Slide 7”> OR
<If information is not on Slide 7, state revenue. Indicate revenue % over or
under projections.>
Margin %
Yellow↓
<“See Slide 7”> OR
<If information is not on Slide 7, state margin %. Indicate revenue % over
or under negotiated margin.>
Operating Income
Red
<“See Slide 7”>OR
<If information is not on Slide 7, state operating income. Indicate revenue
% over or under projections.>
Days Sales
Outstanding
Green↑
<“See Slide 7”.> OR
<If information is not on Slide 7, state days sales outstanding. Does the
program/project have any invoices that have not been paid within the agreed
payment terms? Indicate revenue % over or under projections. Please note
new “Status” percentage colors as described on page 18 and on Balanced
Scorecard Descriptions.>
Earned Value
N/A or %
<Indicate % of earned value.>
<Use “N/A” if earned value not required on program.>
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
<Program Title> Financials
Sub-Category Status Notes
Staffing to Plan
Blue↑
“Staffing to Plan” reflects internally driven issues and successes.
<Are you “Fully Staffed” or do you have vacancies? Provide the numbers of
onboard staff and vacancies (separately) in “FTEs.”>
<Can you keep up with the bid model?
Morale
Green
<Reflect the morale of the staff working on the project.>
Threat to
Coverage
Green
“Coverage” reflects client/contract driven issues and successes
<Do you need to trim back from the bid model?>
<Are you at risk of losing positions?>
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
<Program Title> Staffing
Sub-Category Status Notes
Ideas & Resources
Blue
<Summarize new ideas conceived.>
<Identify level of implementation by client.>
<Qualify resources engaged in development and implementation.>
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
<Program Title> Innovation
Sub-Category Status Notes
Prime/Sub Ratio
Green
<Indicate Prime/Sub Ratio.>
SB/SDB Goals
N/A
<If applicable, discuss small business/small disadvantaged business goals
and status.>
CPAR/Customer
Satisfaction Status Blue
<State the results of any recent program/project CPAR/client satisfaction
survey. If no survey was recently performed, show our PM’s assessment>
Date of Survey
Date
<Show date of last survey &/or next scheduled survey.>
<Program Title> Management
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
Sub-Category Status Notes
Current Work Growth
Green
<Are there any funded increase(s) in tasking(s) anticipated such as
modifications and/or expansions to existing work.? Have there been any
recent discussions involving more work by the project team or increase in
the number of working project personnel? >
Same Client – New
Work Yellow
<Is there any work, not currently being performed, that the client is
interested in having done? Have any discussions occurred between our
personnel and the client?>
New Client – New
Work
Red↓
<Is the work being performed by the project team something that can be
performed for another client? >
<Program Title> Marketing
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
Sub-Category Status Notes
Progress/Schedule Green
<Have any program/project milestones been missed, or are forecast to
miss, the currently approved baseline dates? >
Key Client or Our
Management
Changes
Yellow↑
<Specify any changes in: client sponsorship/executives; our Senior
Executives/Management/Key personnel.>
Conditions:
Facilities &
Environmental
Red↓
<Identify any facilities or environmental issues that have been identified
as posing an operational risk to the program/project.>
Risks
Red
< Quantify all current open risks on page 6.>
Quality Benchmark
Achievement
Yellow
<Identify benchmark in the box, e.g. CMMI, ISO 9K, 20K, 27K.>
<Provide details as appropriate.>
COTR Satisfaction
Yellow
<Discuss any positive or negative indications (verbal, email, letter,
rejected deliverable, etc.) received from your client?>
<PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
<Program Title> Project Execution
1 de 15

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados(20)

My Single Point project portfolio and demandMy Single Point project portfolio and demand
My Single Point project portfolio and demand
PHILIPPE CORNETTE319 visualizações
Project Management - Value PropositionProject Management - Value Proposition
Project Management - Value Proposition
Laura H. McAlister, PMP2.3K visualizações
Project Performance DashboardProject Performance Dashboard
Project Performance Dashboard
Chris Vizzuett6.7K visualizações
2 project initiation, identification and selection2 project initiation, identification and selection
2 project initiation, identification and selection
Dr.R. SELVAM150 visualizações
A Systems Thinking Approach to Benefits Realization PlanningA Systems Thinking Approach to Benefits Realization Planning
A Systems Thinking Approach to Benefits Realization Planning
Systems Thinking IT4.8K visualizações
The role of quality in delivering successful projectsThe role of quality in delivering successful projects
The role of quality in delivering successful projects
Association for Project Management 4.9K visualizações
Principles of program governancePrinciples of program governance
Principles of program governance
Glen Alleman19.5K visualizações
Pharmaceutical Project Management ChecklistPharmaceutical Project Management Checklist
Pharmaceutical Project Management Checklist
Muthu Krishnan416 visualizações
System Design and Analysis 2System Design and Analysis 2
System Design and Analysis 2
Boeun Tim807 visualizações
Best Practices - Project Management & ImplementationBest Practices - Project Management & Implementation
Best Practices - Project Management & Implementation
Synerion North America Inc.6.5K visualizações
Yren Berry resume 113015Yren Berry resume 113015
Yren Berry resume 113015
Ren Berry318 visualizações
Delivering Assurance - Audit, Mark Reilly,  APM ASSURANCE SIG conferenceDelivering Assurance - Audit, Mark Reilly,  APM ASSURANCE SIG conference
Delivering Assurance - Audit, Mark Reilly, APM ASSURANCE SIG conference
Association for Project Management 75 visualizações
Schedule quality webinar, 7 February 2017Schedule quality webinar, 7 February 2017
Schedule quality webinar, 7 February 2017
Association for Project Management 1.2K visualizações
Chap004Chap004
Chap004
maisuradi785 visualizações
Decision treesDecision trees
Decision trees
Devang Thakar154 visualizações

Destaque(12)

Lead Based Paint: The Past, the Present, and the FutureLead Based Paint: The Past, the Present, and the Future
Lead Based Paint: The Past, the Present, and the Future
Environmental Innovative Technologies680 visualizações
Evidencias de las exposicionesEvidencias de las exposiciones
Evidencias de las exposiciones
verito velasquez166 visualizações
Winter fashion maxi dressWinter fashion maxi dress
Winter fashion maxi dress
Lavanya's Trendzs134 visualizações
Curriculum Vitae3Curriculum Vitae3
Curriculum Vitae3
Ritu Dutta309 visualizações
Wellesley 2025 PresentationWellesley 2025 Presentation
Wellesley 2025 Presentation
vermeulens431 visualizações
 Parohia Câineni I  Parohia Câineni I
Parohia Câineni I
AlbumeParohii167 visualizações
แบบสำรวจตนเองแบบสำรวจตนเอง
แบบสำรวจตนเอง
Jiraporn Onlaor298 visualizações
Виталий СтеценкоВиталий Стеценко
Виталий Стеценко
Vitaliy Stetsenko178 visualizações
PPP PoetryPPP Poetry
PPP Poetry
Josh Valerin681 visualizações
Visy glass abrasivesVisy glass abrasives
Visy glass abrasives
Hanh Nguyen Completioner676 visualizações
Theme 03Theme 03
Theme 03
pempeshka209 visualizações

Similar a "7-S's for Success" Framework- Key Success Factors for Program Success-(From Provider perspective)

Multiple Project template.pptxMultiple Project template.pptx
Multiple Project template.pptxAdilPatel34
8 visualizações2 slides
Project charter sampleProject charter sample
Project charter sampleGregory Weiss
7.1K visualizações15 slides
Resume Sanjay D Gowda2Resume Sanjay D Gowda2
Resume Sanjay D Gowda2Sanjay Gowda
148 visualizações4 slides
Large Account Plan PresentationLarge Account Plan Presentation
Large Account Plan PresentationDougScott
9.6K visualizações32 slides

Similar a "7-S's for Success" Framework- Key Success Factors for Program Success-(From Provider perspective)(20)

Multiple Project template.pptxMultiple Project template.pptx
Multiple Project template.pptx
AdilPatel348 visualizações
Project Management ProcessProject Management Process
Project Management Process
Adepitan Oluwasoro, PMP, CSM, MBA359 visualizações
Project charter sampleProject charter sample
Project charter sample
Gregory Weiss7.1K visualizações
Resume Sanjay D Gowda2Resume Sanjay D Gowda2
Resume Sanjay D Gowda2
Sanjay Gowda148 visualizações
Large Account Plan PresentationLarge Account Plan Presentation
Large Account Plan Presentation
DougScott9.6K visualizações
Chap 7.3   Determine budgetChap 7.3   Determine budget
Chap 7.3 Determine budget
Anand Bobade823 visualizações
Mergers & Acquisition Puzzle + Innovation ManagementMergers & Acquisition Puzzle + Innovation Management
Mergers & Acquisition Puzzle + Innovation Management
Sandeep (Sandy) Muju230 visualizações
CV_Bharani Tharan Chiti BabuCV_Bharani Tharan Chiti Babu
CV_Bharani Tharan Chiti Babu
Bharani Tharan Chiti Babu258 visualizações
Kishore panda resume 2Kishore panda resume 2
Kishore panda resume 2
KISHORE KUMAR PANDA150 visualizações
Aravind Seetharaman - ResumeAravind Seetharaman - Resume
Aravind Seetharaman - Resume
Aravind Seetharaman237 visualizações
@CIOBRODY PMO Methodology Overview@CIOBRODY PMO Methodology Overview
@CIOBRODY PMO Methodology Overview
Daniel Brody3K visualizações
Project Management for MarketersProject Management for Marketers
Project Management for Marketers
Jeff Thaler56 visualizações
D08 Quantify Project ValueD08 Quantify Project Value
D08 Quantify Project Value
Leanleaders.org44 visualizações
D08 Quantify Project ValueD08 Quantify Project Value
D08 Quantify Project Value
Leanleaders.org938 visualizações
Jason uyderv pmi 2 16 12Jason uyderv pmi 2 16 12
Jason uyderv pmi 2 16 12
Jason Uyder295 visualizações
VTR_ResumeVTR_Resume
VTR_Resume
Tirumala Vattam159 visualizações
15 Deliv template15 Deliv template
15 Deliv template
Leanleaders.org640 visualizações
D07 Project CharterD07 Project Charter
D07 Project Charter
Leanleaders.org4.8K visualizações
AravindAravind
Aravind
Aravind Seetharaman189 visualizações

Último(9)

TITAN SUBMARINETITAN SUBMARINE
TITAN SUBMARINE
supiriyakithuva15 visualizações
Don't play the Blame GameDon't play the Blame Game
Don't play the Blame Game
schlimbachmichael47 visualizações
balixa.io Plan.pdfbalixa.io Plan.pdf
balixa.io Plan.pdf
tycoonone9115 visualizações
The Wheel of Life - Coaching WheelThe Wheel of Life - Coaching Wheel
The Wheel of Life - Coaching Wheel
Alex Clapson11 visualizações
What Is Psychological Safety?What Is Psychological Safety?
What Is Psychological Safety?
Alex Clapson11 visualizações
TAX ANALYSIS (CASE  OF RWANDA).pptxTAX ANALYSIS (CASE  OF RWANDA).pptx
TAX ANALYSIS (CASE OF RWANDA).pptx
SadamuFrancois5 visualizações

"7-S's for Success" Framework- Key Success Factors for Program Success-(From Provider perspective)

  • 1. Seven Key Factors for Program Success (the Provider perspective)  Pat Schambach  Partner, Schambach &Williams Consulting  Pat.Schambach@gmail.com  571-218-9787
  • 2. <PROGRAM CLIENT NAME> “XYZ” Program - Contract Overview PM: John Smith Reporting Business Unit <Business Unit name> Contract Value/Funded Value $314.2 Million (6-month Base Period plus 6 one-year Option Periods) > Base Period $18.0 Million > Option Year 1 $88.5 Million > Funded Value $106.5 Million Contract Scope Modernization of XYZ agency infrastructure. The “to be” environment is a SOA-based architecture using Oracle product suites. Project involves retiring legacy system and migrating functionality into a service based operation. The work is divided into 14 Task Groups: TG1: Management and Administration; TG2 Enterprise Architecture; TG3-6 New System Development; TG7-10 Steady State Operations and Maintenance; TG12-13 Enhancements to Existing Systems; and TG14 Inquiry Systems Contract Term Start/End 11/08/2010 – 5/07/2017 including all options > Option Year 1 5/08/2011 – 5/07/2012 > Option Year 2 5/08/2012 – 5/07/2013 Client Names Client PM: <name> CO PM: <name> COTR PM: <name> Contract Payment Term Cost Basis : monthly for costs incurred Award Fee : at completion of option year (booking at 85%) Contract Type & Vehicle Cost Plus Award Fee > 0% Base Fee; 7.5% Award Fee Pool Contract Vehicle <contract vehicle name> Team Members <list subcontractors> > Work Share Objectives = ABC Corp. – 16% and DEF Corp – 13%
  • 3. 1. Contracts Funding B↑ Scope G↓ Deliverable Acceptance Y↑ CO Satisfaction R↓ Prime Contractor Satisfaction N/A Contractual Documents Signed B 6. Staffing Staffing to Plan B↑ Morale G Threat to Coverage G 5. Marketing Current Work Growth G Same Client New Work Y New Client New Work R↓ 2. Management Prime/Sub Ratio B SB/SDB Goals N/A CPAR/Customer Satisfaction Status B Date of Survey DATE <PROGRAM CLIENT NAME> “XYZ Program” - Balanced Scorecard for <Month/Year> 3. Financials Budget (Client) B↑ Revenue (Ours) G Margin % Y↓ Operating Income R Days Sales Outstanding G↑ Earned Value N/A 4. Innovation Ideas & Resources B 7. Project Execution Progress/Schedule G Key Client or Our Management Changes Y↑ Conditions: Facilities & Environmental R↓ Risks R Quality Benchmark Achievement CMMI COTR Satisfaction Y
  • 4. <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> <Program Title> Overview/Recap Key Milestones Status •Our team is providing significant SME support to SMS •Our “reach-back” has helped client with the LSI startup; preparation for Integrated Baseline Review (IBR), June 2012 •HCPS resources realigned to LSI Top Issues • Revised FY2013 margin estimate; higher % compared to bid rates • Delays in establishing subcontracts; process issue (non-personnel issue); impact to billable T&M revenue; (May - $30K) • Proposed Architecture (.NET/nServiceBus) may not support planned system transaction volume (7000 claims per day). Lead Solution Architect is working with team to resolve. Accomplishments • Supported IBR completion & delivery (Major Milestone) • Project Schedule – Lifecycle • System Architecture Assessment (Interim Assessment) Key Milestones J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Key Milestones 20132012 SIT Training DIACAP Go-Live DSO Nego 12.7 Staffing to Plan--need 1 FTE Plexis Technical Oppor 10.4 Supplier--delay in subcontract Book 11.0 Acquisition -- Planned Move of staff to LSI Supplier Status Program Acquisition Stability Margin % Focus Technical Progress Cost (CPI) Schedule (SPI) CPAR / Customer Satisfaction Status Staffing to Plan % GG 1.02 0.98 G 0.9 YG
  • 5. <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> Blue – Better than Planned Green – As Planned Yellow – Potential Problem Red – Definite Problem N/A – Not Applicable PM’s “Return To Green” (RTG) Plan Schedule G Schedule will need to be revisited after Arch. Assessment is complete. G Margin R Delayed revenue ($35K) due to charge code availability; ($30K due to delays in Sub-K agreement tenders) Opportunities for overtime will help offset lost Sub-K labor (JUN); Charge code issue corrected for JUN (July PMR); 11.1% 90 Day Mark DPM G Jun DSO G G Customer Satisfaction B CSC cited for efforts in IBR assistance; knowledge/team G Staffing to Plan Y Staffing is in line with revised SMS expectations. Delayed revenue for two months; make up in August/September Need stronger RECRUITING efforts; current sourcing effort not productive for DL Bill Y Aug Suppliers Y Delays associated with subcontract agreements setup tasks (ITManna, ArchSolut, NetVisions). Master IDIQ is needed or setup prior to receipt of the STO. (Requires Indirect Labor Charge/Risk) Dave G Jun Acquisition Stability G G
  • 6. <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> • Contract Value $841.2M • Exercised Price $463.8M • Funded Value $452.8M • DSO (YTD xxx 2012) 85.4 days <Program Title> Financials • Billed - awaiting payment $2.6M – Current $292K; 31-60 days $2M; 61-90 days $288K – $393.6M Paid ITD • Unbilled Balance $19.6M • DSO (Planned / Actual) $ Millions $ Millions CURRENT MONTH YTD Full Year BUDGET ACTUAL DELTA BUDGET ACTUAL DELTA BUDGET ACTUAL DELTA Revenue Operating Income Margin INCEPTION TO DATE BUDGET ACTUAL DELTA EAC Revenue Operating Income Margin
  • 7. <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> <Program Title> Staffing • Staffing: Budget vs. Actual – Variance due to: • Xxxxxxx • Yyyyyyy • Zzzzzzz – # Our FTEs – # Subcontractor FTEs 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 March April May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Baseline Forecast Actuals
  • 8. <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> Detailed Background Slides
  • 9. Sub-Category Status Notes Funding Blue↑ <State the amount and percentage funded. > Scope Green↓ <Has the program/project performed work that is not in the currently approved baseline plan and has not been subject to formal change control?> <Provide any additional comments on scope creep or expectations of the client beyond what was bid.> Note: A description of the project is not required since it is provided on the previous page. Note: If yellow or red, identify as “Risk” under Project Execution. Deliverable Acceptance Yellow↑ <Identify any deliverables accepted within the past month or those being currently evaluated by the client.> < Address any negative indications (verbal, e-mail, letter, rejected deliverable, etc.) received from your client.> CO Satisfaction Red↓ <Use PM’s best judgment.> Prime Contractor Satisfaction N/A < If applicable. Use PM’s best judgment> Contractual Documents Signed Blue <Are all contractual documents (MSA, Statements of Work, Program Definitions, Change Orders, etc.) signed by the client?> <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> <Program Title> Contracts
  • 10. Sub-Category Status Notes Budget (Client) Blue↑ <Is the project within budget? Is the current “burn rate” expected to cover project personnel through the POP?> <Has the program/project exceeded, or is forecast to exceed, budget/cost estimates by more than 5% against the currently approved baseline plan?> Revenue (Ours) Green <“See Slide 7”> OR <If information is not on Slide 7, state revenue. Indicate revenue % over or under projections.> Margin % Yellow↓ <“See Slide 7”> OR <If information is not on Slide 7, state margin %. Indicate revenue % over or under negotiated margin.> Operating Income Red <“See Slide 7”>OR <If information is not on Slide 7, state operating income. Indicate revenue % over or under projections.> Days Sales Outstanding Green↑ <“See Slide 7”.> OR <If information is not on Slide 7, state days sales outstanding. Does the program/project have any invoices that have not been paid within the agreed payment terms? Indicate revenue % over or under projections. Please note new “Status” percentage colors as described on page 18 and on Balanced Scorecard Descriptions.> Earned Value N/A or % <Indicate % of earned value.> <Use “N/A” if earned value not required on program.> <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> <Program Title> Financials
  • 11. Sub-Category Status Notes Staffing to Plan Blue↑ “Staffing to Plan” reflects internally driven issues and successes. <Are you “Fully Staffed” or do you have vacancies? Provide the numbers of onboard staff and vacancies (separately) in “FTEs.”> <Can you keep up with the bid model? Morale Green <Reflect the morale of the staff working on the project.> Threat to Coverage Green “Coverage” reflects client/contract driven issues and successes <Do you need to trim back from the bid model?> <Are you at risk of losing positions?> <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> <Program Title> Staffing
  • 12. Sub-Category Status Notes Ideas & Resources Blue <Summarize new ideas conceived.> <Identify level of implementation by client.> <Qualify resources engaged in development and implementation.> <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> <Program Title> Innovation
  • 13. Sub-Category Status Notes Prime/Sub Ratio Green <Indicate Prime/Sub Ratio.> SB/SDB Goals N/A <If applicable, discuss small business/small disadvantaged business goals and status.> CPAR/Customer Satisfaction Status Blue <State the results of any recent program/project CPAR/client satisfaction survey. If no survey was recently performed, show our PM’s assessment> Date of Survey Date <Show date of last survey &/or next scheduled survey.> <Program Title> Management <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
  • 14. Sub-Category Status Notes Current Work Growth Green <Are there any funded increase(s) in tasking(s) anticipated such as modifications and/or expansions to existing work.? Have there been any recent discussions involving more work by the project team or increase in the number of working project personnel? > Same Client – New Work Yellow <Is there any work, not currently being performed, that the client is interested in having done? Have any discussions occurred between our personnel and the client?> New Client – New Work Red↓ <Is the work being performed by the project team something that can be performed for another client? > <Program Title> Marketing <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE>
  • 15. Sub-Category Status Notes Progress/Schedule Green <Have any program/project milestones been missed, or are forecast to miss, the currently approved baseline dates? > Key Client or Our Management Changes Yellow↑ <Specify any changes in: client sponsorship/executives; our Senior Executives/Management/Key personnel.> Conditions: Facilities & Environmental Red↓ <Identify any facilities or environmental issues that have been identified as posing an operational risk to the program/project.> Risks Red < Quantify all current open risks on page 6.> Quality Benchmark Achievement Yellow <Identify benchmark in the box, e.g. CMMI, ISO 9K, 20K, 27K.> <Provide details as appropriate.> COTR Satisfaction Yellow <Discuss any positive or negative indications (verbal, email, letter, rejected deliverable, etc.) received from your client?> <PROGRAM CLIENT – PROGRAM TITLE> <Program Title> Project Execution