SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 62
Baixar para ler offline
Kindly refer to final report submitted by Mr. Shah Rukh
Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation) ACE Lahore Region
Lahore.
            Brief facts of the case are that Case FIR No. 541/2009,
offence u/s 420/468/471 PPC, Police Station Kahna Lahore was
registered and investigated by local police and report u/s 173 Cr. PC
was submitted by the local police after having found the accused
guilty    of the offence ans submit report u/s 173 Cr. PC to the
prosecutor but report u/s 173 Cr. PC was sent back with the
observation by the Assistant District Public Prosecutor, with thye
observation that public servant i.e. Muhammad Slaeem Patwari is
involved in the commission of offence. So, the case was transferred
to this establishment. The accused public servant has been expired
as per report of IO of local police namely Muhammad Akram ASI.
The remaining accused persons are on bail.
            Judicial action as recommended by the IO in his final
report may be approved against Nazir Ahmad, Abdul Rauf,
Muhammad Sharif, Sadiq and Muhammad Akbar.
            Accused Muhammad Saleem Patwari has been expired so
criminal proceeding against him automatically stand abated.
            However, Investigating Officer before submission of
challan u/s 173 Cr. PC, following documents may be taken into
possession:-
            1.   Statement of present Halqa Patwari.
            2.   Attested copies of mutations in question.
            3.   Death Certificate of Muhammad Saleem Patwari
                 (Deceased)


                                      MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)
                                      Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                          Lahore Region, Lahore.
L/DDP:-
Kindly refer to Para No. 12 to 17-N and final report dated
11.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACE
Head Quarter Lahore.
           Earlier final report was submitted by Mr. SD Khalid the
then DDI-III, ACE Lahore, for approval of judicial action against 12
accused but legal branch raised some legal objection that determine
the role of each accused person, collect the evidence and record their
statements u/s 161 Cr. PC. Meanwhile after the transfer of Mr. SD
Khalid the then DDI-III, ACE Lahore, file was transferred to Circle
Officer Head Quarter for removal of objection raised by legal branch
and submission of RFR.
           I have examine the file and found that CO/IO has not
fulfill the requirement as raised by legal branch and record the
statement of only one accused namely Mushtaq Girdawar.
           Investigating Officer is directed to determine the role of
each accused, record their statements u/s 161 Cr. PC, collect
attested copies of mutations and sale deeds in question and submit
RFR on merits, if agreed please.


                                       MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)
                                       Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                           Lahore Region, Lahore.
L/DDP:-
Kindly refer to Para No. 5 to 7-N and revised final report dated
30.04.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACE
Head Quarter Lahore.
           Earlier Judicial Action against Nasir Rauf, Muhammad
Arshad, Patwari, Muhammad Umair, Muhammad Akram and
Departmental action against Rasheed Ahmad, Patwari, Muhammad
Mansha, Girdawar, Saman Jan Tehsildar was approved by the
competent authority on 12.03.2012. Meanwhile Muhammad Arshad,
Patwari submitted an application before Worthy Director stating,
thathe was not called to submit his defense verion and in he also
submitted some reports of revenue officials in his favour, on which
Worthy    Director    ask    Ciricle   Officer   Head       Quarter   for
comments/report who after recording the version of Muhammad
Arshad Patwari, submitted a revised final report declaring him
innocent in this case. IO has already submitted an incomplete
challan on 21.03.2012 in the court. Now he recommended to submit
the complete report u/s 173 Cr. PC, putting Muhammad Arshad
Patwari in coloumn No.2 of report u/s 173 Cr. PC.
           I have gone through the record and final report dated
12.03.2012, I endorse the recommendation of the IO and I.O may be
directed to submit cancellation report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court of
competent jurisdiction at the earliest, if agreed please.




                                        MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                            Lahore Region, Lahore.

L/DDP:-
Kindly refer to Para No. 10 to 13-N and final report dated
15.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Hassan Raza Khan DDI ACE and Mr.
Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACE Head Quarter Lahore.
           Earlier Judicial Action against Shahzad Ahmad constable
and Departmental action against Ghulam Abbas Inspector and Ijaz
Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal) was recommended by Mr. Riaz Ahmad
Assistant Director Investigation in his final report dated 12.04.2012,
but subsequently His Lordship Mr. Justice Mazahir Ali Akbar Naqvi
called Worthy Director General ACE Punjab on 08.05.2012, who
undertakes for constituting a team to investigate the issue and
submit report in this regard within seven days and Worthy DG ACE
Punjab constituted team comprising Mr. Hassan Raza DDI ACE
Lahore and Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer Head Quarter,
Lahore. They after conducting Investigation submitted a Final Report
Dated 15.05.2012 and they differ with the opinion of previous IO
and   recommended     Judicial    Action   against   Shahzad    Ahmad
constable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector and dropped case against Ijaz
Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal).
           After examining the record it transpired that earlier on
09.02.2012    Mr.   Zaffar     Iqbal   Judicial   MagistrateSection-30,
discharged the accused namely Ghulam Abbas inspector on
09.02.2012 stating as under:-
                 “It is clear from the record that till yet no
material evidence has been collected against the accused
regarding the commission of offence with malafide intention
and it is not in the interest of justice to curtail his liberty by
sending him to judicial lock up. Hence, at this juncture, he is
discharged in this case. He is responsible public servant and
there is no chance of his escape. I.O. may take legal action
against him in accordance with law if he finds any material
evidence against him during investigation. Accused be released
if not required in any other case.”
           I have gone through the record and final report dated
15.05.2012, it reveals from order dated 25.11.2011 of Honorable
Lahore High Court, Lahore it was the responsibility of Ghulam
Abbas Inspector to hand over the parcel containing material
importanat documents himself, negligence and criminal misconduct
is available against both the accused namely Shahzad Ahmad
constable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector. Judical action against Shahzad
Ahmad constable has already been recommended. Now investigating
team has recommended Judicial Action against Ghulam Abbas
Inspector also and dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP
(Legal).


           I endorse the recommendation of the investigating team
and recommend Judicial Action against Ghulam Abbas Inspector
and dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal), if agreed
please.




                                        MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                            Lahore Region, Lahore.

L/DDP:-
           The final report, opinion of ADP & file have been perused. I
endorse the opinion of ADP to approve judicial action against Ghulam
Abbas, Inspector & to drop the case against the Ejaz Hussain Gilani, DSP
as he performed his duty diligently judicial action against Shahzad
Ahmed, Constable has already been approved.




                                    DEPUTY DIRECTOR (PROSECUTION)
                                      Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                          Lahore Region, Lahore.

W/DIRECTOR:-
Kindly refer to final report dated 30.04.2012, submitted by Mr.
Shafaqat Ali circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura.


           Brief facts of the case of that one Syed Basharat Ali
submitted an application before circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura for
raid against Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari Halqa Madhkay on
23.04.2012
           .
           After getting permission from learned District & Sesions
Judge Sheikhupura, who deputed Mr. Rana Sohail Learned Judicial
Magistrate to conduct the raid as per law.


           Learned Magistrate after conducting the raid ordered to
register a criminal case against the said accused and then in
compliance with the order of learned Judicial Magistrate Circle
Officer registered FIR No. 15/2012 offence u/s 161 PPC read with
5/2/47 PCA at Police Station ACE Sheikhupura.


           Perusal of the record reveals that complainant has no
personal work with the accused and has personal grudge with the
accused Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari and Learned Magistrate in his
raid proceeding at page 3 admitted that he was 10 feet away when
the complainant handed over the money and he has not hear the
conversation between them. According to the statement of the
accused Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari, complainant has borrowed Rs.
2000/0 from him, he further stated that complainant called me and
asked for returning my money back and when I came he put the
money in my pocket and the raiding party arrest me without
listening any conversation.


           Previous motive behind the false implication of accused
has also been established during the course of investigation as it has
transpired from the record that complainant intended to get
transferred/inherited the land measuring 6 Murabas inherited by
his deceased brother. On the plea that the female legal heirs left by
the deceased are not Muslim. But the Patwari inherited the property
in accordance with shia law in their favour. So complainant being
aggrieved by this act of Patwari registered a case against him.


            During the course of investigation complainant differed
from his previous statement and filed an affidavit where in he
admitted that he has revenge against the accused he registered a
case against Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari and now he is not
interested to pursue the case, he further stated that he has no
objection to drop the said case.


            Circle Officer/IO has submitted his final report and
stated that prosecution is wastage of time and he recommended to
drop the case.
            I do hereby agree with the opinion of IO and and
recommend to drop the case and intiate the proceeding u/s 182
Cr.PCagainst the complainant Syed Basharat Ali who wasted the
precious time of the agency, if agreed please. Hence, dropping the
case as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed to
submit cancellation report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court of competent
jurisdiction at the earliest.
            Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if
agreed please.


                                       MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)
                                       Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                           Lahore Region, Lahore.
L/DDP:-
            The file as well as opinion of AD(P) has been examined.
The defense plea taken by the accused was firstly recorded by the
raiding Magistrate and is established from record i.e. mutation NO.
540 dated 18.05.2011 is also corroborated by the resiling affidavit of
complainant.
            In view of the recommendations of AD(P) at para No. 16
are endorsed.


                                       ASIF ANJUM WARRAICH (DDP)
                                       Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                           Lahore Region, Lahore.
W/DIRECTOR:-
Kindly refer to para no. 37 to 43, 54 to 56 and revised
final report submitted by Mr. Shafaqat Ali Circle Officer ACE
Sheikhupura.
            Brief facts of the case are that complainant, Muhammad
Ijaz s/o Muhammad Latif filed a petition u/s 22-A & 22-B Cr. PC
alleging that he purchased 8-Kanals land from Sarfraz Ahmad,
General Attorney on behalf of Ghazanfar Ali, but the sale deed was
got registered from the original owner Ghazanfar Ali vide Documents
No. 13275, Book No.1, Volume No. 2548, Dated: 08.09.2005 and
Halqa Patwari Gulfam Akhtar, after taking bribe money entered
mutation No. 3564 dated: 17.08.2005 in his favour and same was
attested by RO. He further alleged that Halqa Patwari, Gulfam
Akhtar with connivance of Ghazanfar Ali Seller, Arif Hussain and
Sarfraz Ahmad, prepare a forged Fard of his land and sell the same
to Arif Hussain through General Power of Attorney vide Document
No. 170 Book No.1, Volume No. 2733, Dated 10.01.2007 and he
entered mutation No. 3814 Dated 17.02.2007 accordingly.               Halqa
Patwari while preparing record of rights in year 2006-2007,
malafidely entered the no of junior mutation No. 3814 of Arif
Hussain inspite of his senior mutation No. 3564.
            After enquiry, case FIR No. 10/2010 dated 20.05.2010,
offence u/s 420/468/471/109 PPC read with section 5/2/47 PCA
was registered against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Sarfraz Ahmad
General Power of Attorney Ghazanfar Ali original Seller at PS ACE
Sheikhupura, it was further approved that role of Mr. Riasat Ali
Girdawar and Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar shall be determined
during the investigation.
            After   completion of investigation,      the   then   DDI-III
recommended Judicial action against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari,
Ghazanfar    Ali    Original   Seller,   Arif   Hussain   Purchaser    and
departmental action against Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat Ali
Girdawar. the file was examined by ADL and DDL who differed with
the opinion of I/O. On their recommendations J/A was approved
against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Ghazanfar Ali (Vendor/Beneficiary),
Sarfraz Ahmad GPA and departmental action against Riasat Ali
Girdawar and Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar.
After approval of Judicial Action bail before arrest was
moved by one accused namely Gulfam Akhtar which was dismissed
by Special Judge Anti-Corruption and Lahore High Court Lahore as
well.
              Subsequently    accused    Gulfam     Akhtar    moved     an
application     to   worthy   Director   General     ACE      Punjab    for
reinvestigation on 16.12.2011 and complainant Muhammad Ijaz also
moved an application to worthy Director General ACE Punjab for
reinvestigation to determine the role of Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar,
Riasat Ali Girdawar. On the said applications worthy Director
General ACE Punjab ordered for reinvestigation of the case and the
investigation again marked to Circle Officer ACE Sheikhupura, who
recorded the statements u/s 161 Cr. PC of Muhammad Nawaz
present Patwari Mouza Mandiali, Malik Rafaqat Ali Present Naib-
Tehsildar, Gulfam Akhtar (accused), Sarfraz Ahmad GPA (accused),
Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar (accused) and the statement of the
complainant Muhammad Ijaz as well. Statements of the complainant
and prosecution witnesses wherein fully corroborated the allegations
leveled in the complainant.
              Now Circle Officer has further recommended judicial
action against Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Malik Riasat Ali Girdawar
against whom D/A was approved. In this way, now I.O recommends
judicial action against all the accused Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Malik
Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat Ali Girdawar, Ghazanfar Ali (Vendor/
Beneficiary),    Arif   Hussain    Purchaser.      Judicial    action   as
recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed to submit
report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court at the earliest.
              Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if
agreed please.



                                         MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)
                                         Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                             Lahore Region, Lahore.
L/DDP:-
Brief facts of the case of that a case FIR No. 514/2009 u/
s 496-A, 380 PPC PS Chunian District Kasur was registered against
Muhammad Shammoon etc. The investigation was with Fateh Sher
ASI. The present complainant who is a real brother of one of the
accused of the said case, alleges that Fateh Sher, ASI, demanded
and received Rs. 370000/- to declare his brother innocent in the
said case but did not do the needful rather. The said case was
cancelled after investigation conducted by Superintendent of Police
District Kasur.
           After preliminary enquiry No. 217/2010-KSR, FIR No.
18/2011 PS Anti Corruption Establishment, Kasur was registered.
Firstly the investigation was conducted by Circle Officer Anti
Corruption Establishment Kasur, who recorded the statements of
the complainant and prosecution witnesses wherein they fully
corroborated the allegations leveled in the complainant. Afterwards
the investigation wsa entrusted to DDI ACE, Lahore. During the
pendency of investigation the accused got pre-arrest bail. During the
hearing of bail petition, the complainant appeared before the court
and stated that his compromise has been affected with the accused.
On his statement, bail was confirmed by the court.
           Now DDI has recommended to approve judicial action. As
the pre-arrest bail has been confirmed by court and the court has
also recorded the statement of complainant. Hence, judicial action
as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed to
submit report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court at the earliest.
           Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if
agreed please.


                                      MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)
                                      Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                          Lahore Region, Lahore.
L/DDP:-
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)
      OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.



SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1027/2012, BY
         MALIK IFTIKHAR AHMAD S/O MALIK FEROZ ALI R/O
         179/D, GUJAR COLONY, CHUNGI AMARSIDHU, LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-

            Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments are

given as under:-.

            Brief facts are that one Malik Iftikhar Ahmad has leveled
allegation of corruption against Qasim Shah Secretary Union Council No.
139, Green Town, Lahore etc vide written complaint No. 3022/2011. After
receiving complaint No. 3022/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted and
the said complaint was converted into regular inquiry vide Enquiry No.
483/2011 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmad Assistant
Director (Investigation), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore.
            That after probing the matter on full length and hearing both
the parties Assistant Director (Inv) has recommended departmental Action
against the delinquents.


            In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully

prayed that the redressal of the complainant has been made accordingly.

The complaint in hand may be filed.




                                            Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                                  Representative
                                          Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                 Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject: REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUS
DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE BRFORE
ISRAR AHMAD KHAN CONSULTANT-IV OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN
LAHORE.


           Kindly refer to subject cited above, it is humbly submitted

that above mentioned complaint was fixed for hearing today i.e.

15.05.2012, in which next date of hearing is 06.06.2012. That I have

attended the office of learned consultant and Honorable Consultant has

directed to conclude the matter before 06.06.2012. (Original Notice No.

2604 Dated 07.05.2012 is attached)

           That re-investigation of case FIR No. 239/11, Police Station

Kot Radha Kishan District Kasur is pending before the Circle Officer Head

Quarter, Lahore. Kindly direct the said officer to conclude the matter

before 06.06.2012 and submit his report on 06.06.2012.

           Submitted for further necessary action please.




                                     MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADL-V)
                                      Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                           Lahore Region, Lahore.

W/DDL
To,
      The Worthy Director,
      Anti-Corruption Establishment,
      Lahore Region, Lahore.

Subject:    PROGRESS REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 1153/2012

Respected Sir,

             It is respectfully submitted that I attended the court of Learned
District and Sessions Judge, Lahore on 13-04-2012, in contempt petition /
Application titled Shahid Siddique VS Director ACE, Lahore.

            That detail report was submitted by Rana Tariq Mahmood
Deputy Director Legal on 11.04.2012 as per direction of Learned District and
Sessions Judge, Lahore.

              That on 13-04-2012 Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore
has passed an order and dismisses the said petition/Application. (Copy of
orders is attached)

            Submitted for necessary further action please.




                                              Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                             Anti-Corruption Establishment,
                                               Lahore Region Lahore.
                                  L/DDL
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)
    OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.



SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 848/2012, BY
         IQBAL HUSSAIN S/O MUSA R/O MODEL TOWN, LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-

              Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments are

given as under:-.

              That the complainant has filed an application before your

good office and alleged that his properties situates at Kot Addu district

Muzaffar Garh, Jampur district Rajanpur, Kot Chutta District Dera Ghazi

Khan and concerned patwaris has prepared forged documents of above

mentioned properties. The complainant further alleged that he filed an

application before Anti-Corruption Department on 24th February 2012 but

no material steps has been taken by the Anti-Corruption Department.

              It is pertinent to mention here that above allegations are

within the jurisdiction of Anti-Corruption Establishment, Dera Ghazi

Khan Region and complainant never filed any application before the office

of   the    respondent/Director   Anti-Corruption     Establishment,   Lahore

Region, Lahore.

              In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully

prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director

Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore and report of the

above      complaint   may   be   sought   from     Director   Anti-Corruption

Establishment, Dera Ghazi Khan Region.




                                              Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                                    Representative
                                            Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                  Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT
     OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT &
              SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                            GHULAM MURTAZA

                                     VS

             DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                     LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-

     Brief    facts   are   that   one    Ghulam   Murtaza    has   leveled
allegations against Tehsildar Halqa Niaz Beg and others vide
complaint No. 12/2012 in the office of the respondent.
     That according to Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985,
preliminary inquiry was conducted by Ch. Maqbool Ahmad Assistant
Director (Inv). Who after examining the record submitted his final
report and recommended to drop the said complaint on 08.03.2012,
because the civil litigation is pending between the parties.
     That on the recommendations of the Investigating officer
competent authority/respondent has dropped the said complaint on
21.03.2012.


Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                            Assistant Director (Legal)
                                          Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                            Lahore Region, Lahore.
To,
      The Worthy Director,
      Anti-Corruption Establishment,
      Lahore Region, Lahore.

Subject:    REPORT IN `PETITION U/S 22-A & 22-B, FILED BY
            MIAN SARFRAZ JAWA ADVOCATE

Respected Sir,
       It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the
report/comments in the court of Mr. Abdul Sattar Langah Sb Learned
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Lahore on 12-04-2012.

      That Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge has directed as
under:-
      “In view of comments submitted by Assistant Director Legal, Anti-
Corruption Establishment, Lahore, the respondents are directed to get
record the verbatim statement of the petitioner and redress the grievance of
the petitioner as per rules and law”(Attested copy of the orders is attached
herewith)

      Submitted for necessary further action please.




                                              Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                             Anti-Corruption Establishment,
                                               Lahore Region Lahore.
L/DDL
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                               NASIR MAQBOOL

                                      VS

             DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                     LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


             Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Tauqeer has

leveled allegation of corruption against Nasir Maqbool Qureshi etc.

             That regular enquiry No. 98/2012 dated 09.02.2012 was

entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director Investigation.

             That Investigating officer has recorded the version of both the

parties. The petitioner has joined the Inquiry and on last date of hearing

he requested for adjournment. That said enquiry is still pending due to

lack of interest of the petitioner.

             That further action on the said enquiry may be taken as per

Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985.



      Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the

petitioner may be directed to join the enquiry. So that the matter be

concluded as per law. In this circumstances petition in hand may

kindly be dismissed.




                                             Assistant Director (Legal)
                                           Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                               Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF ABDUL SATTAR LANGAH
   LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
                    LAHORE.




                      MIAN SARFRAZ AFTAB JAWA

                                   VS

           DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                   LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


            Brief facts of the case are that on the written complaint of

Mian Sarfraz Aftab Jawa Advocate, preliminary inquiry was conducted by

the competent authority.

            That Mian Sarfraz Aftab Jawa Advocate has leveled allegation

of corruption against Serwar Si PS Mangamandi, Lahore. After receiving

complaint No. 997/12, preliminary enquiry was conducted by Assistant

Director Complaints, who vide its Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-997)2012/5008

dated 22.03.2012, sought comments from CCPO, Lahore. (Copy enclosed)

The redressal of grievance of the petitioner is under process and after

receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore further action will be taken as per

Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985.

               Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the

petition in hand may kindly be disposed of.




                                          Assistant Director (Legal)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                             Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                          MUHAMMAD YASIN

                                   VS

           DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                   LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


            Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Yasin has

leveled allegation of corruption against ASI Mushtaq Ahmad etc PS

Baghbanpura, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 126/12, preliminary

enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its

letter No. ACE-LR-(C-126)2012/1283-1284 dated 24.01.2012 seeking

comments from CCPO, Lahore.

            That after receiving the comments from CCPO Lahore

competent authority has converted the complaint in to regular inquiry

vide Inquiry No. 212/2012 on 27.03.2012 and the same was entrusted to

Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation).

            The grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and further

action may be taken as per law.

              Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the

petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                          Assistant Director (Legal)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                          Lahore Region, Lahore.
To,
      The Worthy Director,
      Anti-Corruption Establishment,
      Lahore Region, Lahore.

Subject:    REPORT IN FIR NO. 200/2009, OFFENCE U/S 420

Respected Sir,
       It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the
report/comments in the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore
today i.e. 29-03-2012, in contempt petition titled Shahid Siddique VS
Director ACE, Lahore.

      That Learned District and Sessions Judge has directed to record the
version of the petitioner and decide the matter as per law before 11.04.2012.

       That detail report will be submitted on 11.04.2012 as per direction of
Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. Kindly direct the concerned
officer to decide the matter as early as possible. So that the report be
submitted on 11.04.2012 in the court.

      Submitted for necessary further action please.


                                              Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                             Anti-Corruption Establishment,
                                               Lahore Region Lahore.
                                  L/DDL
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                      MALIK MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ

                                     VS

             DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                     LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-

     Brief    facts   are   that   one    Muhammad      Shahbaz    son     of
Muhammad Hanif has leveled allegations against Mian Absar DSP
Circle Masti Gate and others vide complaint No. 559/2012 in the
office of the respondent.
     That according to Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985,
preliminary inquiry is being conduct by the office of respondent and
in this regard comments were sought from CCPO, Lahore vide Letter
No. ACE-LR-(C-559)-2012/3032 & 3033 Dated 23-02-2012.
     That the preliminary enquiry is entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh
Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Inv) on 21-03-2012. Who has called
both the parties to record their version on 04-04-2012.
     In view of above mentioned submissions it is most respectfully
prayed that the applicant may be directed to attend the office of the
Enquiry Officer on 04-04-2012. Under the circumstances, it is
respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be
dismissed.



                                            Assistant Director (Legal)
                                          Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                            Lahore Region, Lahore.
|To,
       The Worthy Director,
       Anti-Corruption Establishment,
       Lahore Region, Lahore.

Subject:     PROGRESS REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 1153/2012

Respected Sir,
       It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the
report/comments in the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore
today i.e. 29-03-2012, in contempt petition titled Shahid Siddique VS
Director ACE, Lahore.

      That Learned District and Sessions Judge has directed to record the
version of the petitioner and decide the matter as per law before 11.04.2012.

       That detail report will be submitted on 11.04.2012 as per direction of
Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. Kindly direct the concerned
officer to decide the matter as early as possible. So that the report be
submitted on 11.04.2012 in the court.

       Submitted for necessary further action please.


                                               Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                              Anti-Corruption Establishment,
                                                Lahore Region Lahore.
L/DDL
DIRECTORATE OF
                           ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                                LAHORE REGION LAHORE.

To,
      The Haji Rana Fawad Ahmad
      Circle Officer,
      Anti-Corruption Establishment,
      Lahore Region, Lahore.

No. ACE-DDL-2012/                          Dated:

Subject:    COMPLAINT NO. 357-1-12 FILED BY HAJI LIAQAT
            ALI R/O DISTRICT LAHORE- IN THE OFFICE OF
            OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB

       I am directed to inform you by the office of the Learned Ombudsman
Punjab as under:-
       That one Haji Liaqat Ali S/O Hussain Khan filed a complaint No.
357/1/12, against you before Ombudsman Punjab leveling some allegations of
faulty investigation.(Copy of application is attached)
       That the complainant states that matter in case FIR No. 1916/2011,
offence under section 420,468,471 PPC read with section 5/2/47 of PCA,
Police Station Kahna, Lahore was under your investigation and you have not
completed your investigation on merit.
       That in this regards Memo No. DAC-DD(Legal-19)2012/2699 Dated
10.02.2012 was also received from Deputy Director Legal, Anti-Corruption
Establishment, Punjab Lahore, wherein he has directed for submission of
report& parawise comments in the said case. (Copy of Letter is attached)
       That the complaint was lastly fixed for hearing on 26.03.2012 and the
same was adjourned for 25-04-2012 You are therefore required to appear
before Mr. Israr Ahmad Learned Consultant-IV, office of the Ombudsman
Punjab, Lahore along with written reply/parawise comments without any
delay.



                                             (MALIK NAVEED TARIQ)
                                              Assistant Director (Legal),
                                            Anti-Corruption Establishment,
                                              Lahore Region Lahore.
Copy for information:-
    1. P.A. to Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore
       Region, Lahore.
    2. P.A. to Director General Anti-Corruption Establishment,
       Punjab, Lahore.
DIRECTORATE OF
                            ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                                 LAHORE REGION LAHORE


To,

      The Assistant Director (D),
      Anti-Corruption Establishment,
      Pubjab, Lahore.


No. ACE-LR-(E-598/11/L)-2012/

Dated:

Subject:       COMMUNICATION OF ORDERS OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB
               TO THE AGENCY ABOUT NON-COMPLIANCE OF
               DIRECTION

      Kindly refer to your office Endst. No. DAC-CR-ML-65-12/3409 dated
21.02.2012, on the subject cited above.


      In compliance with the orders of Worthy Director General conveyed to
the undersigned through endorsement under reference the requisite report has
been submitted in the office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore will be
submitted on 28.03.2012. Copy of report is enclosed herewith for your kind
information.




                                    DEPUTY DIRESTOR (LEGAL)
                                 ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                                    LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
DIRECTORATE OF
                            ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                                 LAHORE REGION LAHORE


To,

      The Assistant Director (D),
      Anti-Corruption Establishment,
      Pubjab, Lahore.


No. ACE-LR-(E-598/11/L)-2012/

Dated:

Subject:    COMMUNICATION OF ORDERS OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB
            TO THE AGENCY ABOUT NON-COMPLIANCE OF
            DIRECTION

      Kindly refer to your office Endst. No. DAC-CR-ML-65-12/3409 dated
21.02.2012, on the subject cited above.


      In compliance with the orders of Worthy Director General conveyed to
the undersigned through endorsement under reference the requisite report has
been submitted in the office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore on
28.03.2012. Copy of report submitted in the office of Ombudsman Punjab is
enclosed herewith for your kind information.




                                    DEPUTY DIRESTOR (LEGAL)
                                 ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                                    LAHORE REGION LAHORE
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)
    OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.


                         MUHAMMAD IRSHAD

                                   VS

DIRECTORE GENERAL ANT-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT.


SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 706/2012

Respectfully Sheweth:-

            Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments are

given as under:-.

            Brief facts of the complaint are that Enquiry NO. 197/2010,

against Muhammad Irshad EST Govt. Elementary School Maher Chand

Wala District Kasur was under probe in the office of Deputy Director, ACE

Kasur and Circle Officer Kasur was Enquiry Officer in the said complaint.

            That it is pertinent to mention here that the said Enquiry

Officer has recommended for dropping the said inquiry and the same is

still pending for final approval of the competent authority. It is further

submitted that allegations of harassment by the complainant are baseless.

            In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully

prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed.




                                             Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                                  Representative
                                           Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                               Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT
    (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.


                           BAGH ALI BHATTI

                                    VS

          DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE


SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1159/2011


Respectfully Sheweth:-

            Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments

had already been submitted in complaint No. 4776/2010, which was on

the same subject matter.

            Brief facts of the case are that FIR NO. 02/2011 at Police

Station ACE Lahore was lodged on the complaint of Bagh Ali Bhatti. After

lodging the FIR the matter was investigated by the circle officer Head

Quarter, Lahore and the investigating officer after investigation declare the

accused persons innocent and discharged the accused persons.

            That the investigating officer has submitted the discharge

report under section 173 CR.PC in the competent court vide Road

Certificate No. 55/21, dated 16.01.2012.

            In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully

prayed that the complaint in hand has become infectious and the

complainant may be directed to approach the concerned court and the

complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-Corruption

Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.




                                               Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                                    Representative
                                             Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                 Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR
    AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE
            OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.


                           BAGH ALI BHATTI

                                    VS

            DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE


SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 4776/2010


Respectfully Sheweth:-

             Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are given

as under.

             Brief facts of the case are that FIR NO. 02/2011 at Police

Station ACE Lahore was lodged on the complaint of Bagh Ali Bhatti. After

lodging the FIR the matter was investigated by the circle officer Head

Quarter, Lahore and the investigating officer after investigation declare the

accused persons innocent and discharged the accused persons.

             That the investigating officer has submitted the discharge

report under section 173 CR.PC in the competent court vide Road

Certificate No. 55/21, dated 16.01.2012.

             In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully

prayed that the complaint in hand has become infectious and the

complainant may be directed to approach the concerned court and the

complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-Corruption

Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.




                                               Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                                    Representative
                                             Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                 Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)
    OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.


                         TANVEER MAHMOOD

                                    VS

            DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE


SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 3419/2011


Respectfully Sheweth:-

             Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are given

as under.

             Brief facts of the case are that one Tanveer Mahmood has filed

a complaint No. 3419/2011. He submitted in his complaint that he has

submitted an application before respondent vide Enquiry No. 42/2011,

but the respondent No. 1, is not interested to proceed further.

             That after perusal of the record it reveals that the said
Enquiry is relating to somew one else and is not related to the
complainant Tanveer Mahmood.
             In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully

prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director

Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.




                                               Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                                    Representative
                                             Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                 Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR
    AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE
            OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.


                             NAZAR ELAHI

                                    VS

            DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE

SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1988/6/11


Respectfully Sheweth:-

             Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are given

as under.

             Brief facts are that one Nazar Elahi has leveled allegation of
corruption against Akhtar Hussain Stenographer vide written complaint
No. 159/2011. After receiving complaint No. 159/11, preliminary enquiry
was conducted and the said complaint was converted into regular inquiry
vide Enquiry No. 31/2011 and the same was entrusted to Deputy Director
(Investigation), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Okara.
             That after probing the matter on full length and hearing both
the parties Deputy Director (Inv), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Okara
has recommended for dropping the said enquiry and the competent
authority dropped the same on 27.02.2012, vide letter No. ACE-LR-
(E-31/11/OK)-2012/323
             That allegations of corruption was not proved by the
complainant Nazar Elahi, against the respondent Akhtar Hussain



             In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully

prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director

Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.




                                              Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                                   Representative
                                            Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR
    AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE
            OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.


                       RANA ANWAR HUSSAIN

                                    VS

                          RANA IRSLAN KHAN

SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 4016/11



Respectfully Sheweth:-

            Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are given

as under.

            That complainant has leveled some personal allegations

against the then Circle Officer Rana Irslan Khan who is repatriated to his

parent department and the said complaint was filed after the repatriation

of the said delinquent official. That said delinquent is now serving in

Motorway Police, he can explain the allegations himself and office of the

Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore has no

concern with the said delinquent official.

            In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully

prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director

Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.




                                               Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)
                                                    Representative
                                             Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                 Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE
COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
           & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                              HIDAYAT BIBI

                                    VS

            DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                    LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-

      Brief facts of the case are that one Mst. Hadayat Bibi has leveled
allegation of corruption against 1) Muhammad Jahngir 2) Muhammad
Saleem, Secretary Union Council Sultan Mahmood No. 38, Lahore               3)
Administrator Union Council Sultan Mahmood No. 38, Lahore. After
receiving complaint No. 3887/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted and
prima facie allegations of corruptions were made out. That competent
authority/respondent    has   approved     regular   enquiry   against   above
mentioned accused persons and complaint No. 3887/11 was converted
into regular enquiry vide enquiry No. 45/2012 dated 21.01.2012 and the
same was entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazai Assistant Director
(Inv) on 21.01.2012. The investigating officer has issued notice both the
parties for 10.03.2012. The petitioner alongwith her witnesses may join
the investigation for recording her statement and matter will be decided
after hearing both the parties on merit.
               Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                             Assistant Director (Legal)
                                           Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                                 ALLAH DITTA

                                     VS

            DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                    LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-

            Brief facts of the case are that one Allah Ditta has filed a

petition under section 22-A & 22-B for compliance of order of this

Honorable Court Dated 04.10.2011. He further submitted that he has

submitted an application alongwith order of this Honorable Court vide

Diary No. 5264/2011, Dated 28.11.2011 but the respondent No. 1, is not

interested to proceed further.

            After perusal of the record it reveals that an application

submitted by petitioner was already decided vide enquiry No. 237/2011.

The said enquiry was decided by Assistant Director (Investigation) and the

same was dropped vide letter NO. ACE-LR-(E-237/2011/L)2011/11318

dated 03.11.2011.

               Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the

petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                            Assistant Director (Legal)
                                          Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                               Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                          MUHAMMAD YASIN

                                   VS

           DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                   LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


           Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Yasin has

leveled allegation of corruption against ASI Mushtaq Ahmad etc PS

Baghbanpura, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 126/12, preliminary

enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its

letter No. ACE-LR-(C-126)2012/1283-1284 dated 24.01.2012 seeking

comments from CCPO, Lahore. The redressal of grievance of the petitioner

is under process and after receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore further

action may be taken as per law.

              Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the

petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                          Assistant Director (Legal)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                             Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                          MUHAMMAD ISHAQ

                                   VS

           DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                   LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


           Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Ishaq has

leveled allegation of corruption against SI Muhammad Younis PS Garhi

Shahu Lahore etc. After receiving complaint No. 3833/11, preliminary

enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its

letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3833) 2011/13136 dated 24.12.2011 seeking

comments from CCPO, Lahore. The redressal of grievance of the petitioner

is under process and after receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore further

action may be taken as per law.

              Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the

petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                          Assistant Director (Legal)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                             Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject:    REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUS
            DIRECTOR,   ANTI  CORRUPTION   ESTABLISHMETN,
            LAHORE BRFORE ISRAR AHMAD KHAN CONSULTANT-IV
            OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN LAHORE.


            Kindly refer to subject cited above, it is humbly submitted

that above mentioned complaint was fixed for hearing on 22.02.2012, in

which next date of hearing is 10.03.2012. That Honorable Consultant has

adjourned the said complaint for 10.03.2012 with the direction to

conclude the matter till next date of hearing.

            Submitted for further necessary action please.




                                       MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADL-V)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                             Lahore Region, Lahore.

W/DDL
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                                KAMRAN AFZAL

                                      VS

             DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                     LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


              Brief facts of the case are that one Kamran Afzal has leveled
allegation of corruption against SI Asghar Ali PS Shahdra Town, Lahore.
After   receiving   complaint   No.   4031/11,    preliminary   enquiry   was
conducted by the Deputy Director (Inv-I), both the parties were summoned
for 03.01.12. Despite of calling again and again the complainant Kamran
Afzal could not appear before the Deputy Director Investigation. The
respondent Asghar Ali SI stated that the complainant conducts the
gambling at club and he as per law registered FIR No. 1259/11 and
recovery was also affected from him. He further states that the
complainant is blackmailing just to avoid the further proceedings. The
allegation of corruption against Asghar Ali SI was not proved in the said
preliminary enquiry.
              That allegation of corruption was not proved against the
respondent SI Asghar Ali competent authority dropped the complaint on
06.01.2012.
                Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                             Assistant Director (Legal)
                                           Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                              MUHAMMAD ARIF

                                       VS

            DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                    LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


                           Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad
Arif has leveled allegation of corruption against Asif Ali Patwari Halqa
Manga Mandi Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 2055/11, preliminary
enquiry was conducted by Deputy Director (Inv-III) Anti Corruption
Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Respondent Asif Ali Patwari denied
the allegations regarding receipt of illegal gratification of Rs. 5000/- for
issuance of Fard. He stated that the land is still in the name of Sardar
Bibi (Mother of the complainant and inheritance mutation of the mother of
the complainant has not yet been sanctioned. He further stated that he
advised the complainant that inheritance mutation may be sanctioned
from competent authority before issuance of Fard and the complainant get
angry and he filed this application malafidely. Prima facie allegations of
taking illegal gratification could not be established, even then competent
authority   has    referred   the   matter    in   question   to   the   Assistant
Commissioner for enquiry and necessary action as per law, vide letter No.
ACE-LR-(C-2055) 2011/10033 dated 05.10.2011. The petitioner may
approach to the Assistant Commissioner.
                  Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                               Assistant Director (Legal)
                                             Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                  Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                              MUNAWAR KHAN

                                      VS

            DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                    LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


            Brief facts of the case are that one Munawar Khan has leveled
allegation of corruption against SI Muhammad Yasin PS Civil Line,
Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3396/11, preliminary enquiry was
conducted and letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3396) 2011/11582 dated 15.11.2011
and Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3396) 2011/11962 dated 24.11.2011 was sent
to CCPO Lahore for enquiry report which was received vide Diary No.
1659/MISC/CC/CCPO Dated 16.12.2011 in which inquiry officer stated
that   ……………“business          relation     has   been   existed   between
complainant      and Mian Autos. During Investigation complainant
has withdraw his application and denied any claim against SI
Muhammad Yasin”……, and allegation of corruption against Muhammad
Yasin SI was not proved in the said enquiry conducted by Superintendent
of Police Investigation Civil Line Division, Lahore.
            That being non-disclosure of allegations and allegations of
corruption was not proved by the complainant Munawar Khan against the
respondent SI Muhammad Yasin competent authority dropped the
complaint on 06.01.2012.
                Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                             Assistant Director (Legal)
                                           Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                            MIAN QAISAR AZIZ

                                      VS

             DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                     LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


             Brief facts of the case are that one Mian Qaisar Aziz has
leveled allegation of corruption against SI Waseem PS Lower Mall, Lahore.
After   receiving   complaint   No.   3239/11,    preliminary   enquiry   was
conducted and letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3239) 2011/13070 dated 24.12.2011
was sent to CCPO Lahore for enquiry which was received vide Diary No.
178/MISC/CC/CCPO Dated 28.01.2011 and allegation against Waseem
SI proved in the said enquiry conducted by Superintendent of Police
Investigation Iqbal Town Division, Lahore. That respondent approved
regular enquiry against Waeem SI vide regular enquiry No. 113/2012
dated 13.02.2012 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmad Ch.
Assistant Director (Inv) on 21.02.2012. The investigating officer has issued
notice both the parties for 10.03.2012. The petitioner may approach to the
investigating officer for recording his statement and matter will be decided
after hearing both the parties on merit.
                Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                             Assistant Director (Legal)
                                           Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MUZAFFAR MEHMOOD GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
    SECRETARY AUQAF & RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS DEPARTMETN




Subject:      NOTE   FOR    PERSONAL    HEARING     IN THE
              PREPRESENTATION   FILED  BY    DIRECTOR, ANTI
              CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE AGAINST THE
              OMBUDSMAN’S ORDER DATED 10.08.2011


              Kindly refer to notice No. PS/Secy A&RA/1-9/2012 dated
16.01.2012 issued by your good self on the subject noted above.
              Facts in brief are that case FIR No. 183/2004 was registered
against    the   complainant/accused       namely     Ch.    Muhammad Naeem,
Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi Town, Lahore alongwith other co accused
persons at PS ACE, Lahore Region after approval of competent authority
and incomplete challan against him was submitted in the court of Learned
Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore on 02.03.2005. On
13.04.2005 complainant/accused joined investigation after obtaining
interim bail and produced receipts Nos 1977 dated 24.02.2005 and 1978
dated     25.02.2005   amounting     to    Rs.    440000/=     (3,00000+1,40000)
deposited by him in the Government Treasury showing the embezzled
amount due against him to the I.O with his free consent which were taken
into possession by the I.O in presence of witnesses through recovery
memo dated 13.04.2005 placed at page 317-C. On 19.04.2005
interim bail of complainant/accused was cancelled by the Learned
Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore as withdrawn and his
arrest was effected by the I.O through Zimni No. 81 para NO. 1
dated      19.04.2005.    The    Learned         Senior    Special   Judge     Anti
Corruption       Lahore   vide     order    dated         20.04.2005   sent    the
complainant/accused            namely      Muhammad           Naeem     Electrical
Supervisor, TMA Ravi Town, Lahore to judicial lockup and the case
is subjudic in the court of law.
              I have examined the case on legal as well as factual
aspects and found that on prima facie proving the allegations case
FIR No. 183/2004 PS ACE, Lahore was registered against the
complainant/accused after approval of competent authority. During
investigation     sufficient    incriminating      material    to    connect   the
accused with the embezzlement was collected by the I.O and the
recovery of Rs. 440000/- was effected from him which was produced
by him through his free will specifically when he was on interim bail
at the time of recovery so there is no element of coercion or
maladministration on the part of I.O at the time of recovery as
alleged in the complaint.
           Since the matter is subjudice in the court of competent
jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of Learned Ombudsman Punjab is
barred to entertain the complaint U/S 9 (1)(a) of “The Punjab Office
of the Ombudsman Act,1997” which is as under:-
           “Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the
           Ombudsman: - (i) The Ombudsman may on a
           complaint by any aggrieved person, on a
           reference by the Government or the Provincial
           Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme Court
           or the High Court made during the course of
           any proceedings before it or of his own motion,
           undertake any investigation into any allegation
           of maladministration on the part of any Agency
           or any of its officers or employees.
           Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have
           any jurisdiction to investigate or enquiry into
           any matter which:-
    (a) are subjudice before a court of competent
          jurisdiction on
           the date of the receipt of a complaint, reference
           or motion by him”.
           In view of above, it is a fit case for filing of Representation
to the Governor, Punjab Lahore U/S 32 of the Punjab Office of the
Ombudsman Act,1997. Matter may therefore, be entrusted to the
Learned DD(P), ACE, Lahore Region for futher proceedings but after
bringing the matter into knowledge of the Worthy DG ACE, Punjab
Lahore as a copy of impugned order dated 10.08.2011 has also been
sent to him.
           Last     date     of    limitation       for    filing     OF
Representation to the Governor, Punjab, Lahore against
order    dated     10.08.2011        passed       by   the     Learned
Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore is going to 09.09.2011.
Submitted for appropriate orders please.




                                    MUNIR SHAHID
                                    Representative
                             Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                 Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                          HAJI ABDUL REHMAN

                                     VS

           DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                   LAHORE REGION LAHORE.


Respectfully Sheweth:-


            Brief facts of the case are that one Abdul Rehman has leveled
allegation of corruption against SI Ghulam Abbas PS Muslim Town,
Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3151/11, preliminary enquiry was
conducted and letter No. 11205 dated 01.11.2011 was sent to CCPO
Lahore for enquiry which was received on 24.12.2011 and allegation
against Ghulam Abbas SI proved in the said enquiry conducted by
Superintendent   of   Police   Investigation   Iqbal   Town,   Lahore.   That
respondent approved regular enquiry against Ghulam Abbas SI vide
regular enquiry No. 69/2012 dated 28.01.2012 and the same was
entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Inv) on
07.02.2012. The investigating officer has issued notice for 16.02.2012.
The petitioner may approach to the investigating officer for recording his
statement and matter will be decided after hearing both the parties on
merit.
               Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.




                                            Assistant Director (Legal)
                                          Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                               Lahore Region, Lahore
ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
                                 LAHORE REGION LAHORE

To


              The Deputy Director (Legal),
              Directorate of Anti Corruption Establishment,
              Punjab, Lahore.


              No.ACE-LR-2012/                             Dated:-


Subject:      SUBMISSION OF REPORT REGARDING COMPLAINT
              NO. 738-OPK-11 & 1830-OPK-11 IN THE COURT OF
              MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT &
              SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.

Respected Sir,

              It is submitted that petition u/s 22-A & 22-B filed by

Mst. Horran Bibi W/o Nazar Khan is pending before Mr. Muhammad

Ijaz Butt Addition District & Sessions Judge Lahore in which next

date of hearing is fixed on 10.02.2012. Final report regarding

complaint No. 738-OPK-11 & 1830-OPK-11 is required by the verbal

order of the Court.

              Kindly depute any officer to submit the same in the court

and oblige.

              Submitted please.



                                         MALIK NAVEED TARIQ
                                        Assistant Director (Legal)
                                      Anti Corruption Establishment
                                           Lahore Region Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                               SHAMS-UD-DIN

                                      VS

                DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC.


Respectfully Sheweth:-

                                BRIEF FACTS

            Brief facts of the complaint are that complainant Shams-ud-
Din as alleged that Zulafiqar Patwari has received Rs. 30000/- from him
as illegal gratification to record the stay order proceedings in Revenue
Register and after getting the bribe he entered the stay order Vide Rapt
No. 4 dated 04.09.2005 in Roznamcha. On his complaint enquiry was
initiated against the said Patwari who appeared in person before enquiry
officer and has denied the allegations leveled on him. After probing the
matter final report was submitted by Rao Pervaiz Akhtar the then
Assistant Director (Inv) on 19.12.2011.
            Legal branch after examining the final report and file on
05.01.2012 raised some legal objections and recommended that after re-
enquiring the matter revised final report be submitted. Competent
authority passed order on 11.01.2012 for compliance of objections raised
by legal branch and file entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmed Assistant Director
(Inv) on 13.01.2012, who is probing the matter and the same will be
finalized soon.
                  Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt application being based on false facts and information be kindly
be dismissed.


                                             Assistant Director (Legal)
                                           Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                      SHEIKH KHALID SAEED

                                VS

 DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE REGION LAHORE ETC.




REPORT IN PETITION UNDER SECTION 22-A & 22-B OF CR PC
SUBMITTED BY MALIK NAVEED TARIQ ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
(LEGAL) ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION
LAHORE.



Respectfully Sheweth:-

          That complainant submitted an application to Chief

Minister Punjab which was entrusted to respondent No. 1 by PSO to

Chief Minister Punjab. Wherein the applicant requested to probe the

matter and take legal action against the accused persons. The

complainant Sh. Khalid Saeed R/o 85-The Mall, Imtiaz Plaza vide

property No. 85/108-R19-S has alleged that M/S Imran Ashraf

Revenue Officer, Abdul Khaliq Qanongo, Irfan Ali Patwari Mouza

Mozang Lahore. He further stated that Record Keeper Data Gunj

Bakhsh Town, Lahore have made forged and bogus mutation and

changed the Khasra No. 2113 & 2114 of his property measuring 6

Marla 24 Sqft, in-connivance with his opponent party and revenue

functionaries in-connivance with the beneficiaries issued Fard for

sale of property in Khasra No. 2113 through Rapt Roznamcha 831
dated 11.08.2010 by fabricating Fard Badar No. 285 dated

29.07.2010.

            On the written complaint the matter was probed by the

enquiry officer S.D. Khalid Deputy Director (Inv) Anti Corruption

Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore vide enquiry No. 167/2011

who after hearing both the parties submitted his final report on

16.07.2011. Enquiry officer has recommended that the matter

pertains to demarcation of property and parties have already

invoked the jurisdiction of Civil Court, no criminal misconducts on

the part of any public servant regarding preparation of Fard Badar

could be substantiated during enquiry and the matter was referred

to the Additional Collector, District Lahore for further necessary

action as to the allegations regarding demarcation of property etc. In

this   regard   letter   No.    ACE-LR-(E-167/11/L)-2011/8397    dated

10.09.2011 was sent to the Additional Collector, District Lahore

wherein it is referred that:-

            “After due process, the Competent Authority
            have approved that the matter may be referred
            to your good office at your own end as to the
            allegations regarding demarcation of property
            etc. under intimation to this office”.


PRAYER:

            Under the circumstances, petition being without any

lawful cause of action, is prayed to be disposed of.




                                         Assistant Director (Legal)
                                       Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                           Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR.ISRAR AHMED THE LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)
      OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.




REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2016/11 SUBMITTED BY CH. MUHAMMAD
NAEEM.




Respectfully Sheweth:-

                Kindly refer to notice No. 2016-11 dated 14.11.2011on the
subject noted above.
                It is submitted that case FIR No. 183/04 was registered
against    the    complainant/accused    namely   Ch.    Muhammad Naeem,
Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi town, Lahore alongwith other co-accused
persons at PS ACE, Lahore Region after approval of competent authority
and incomplete challan against him was submitted in the court of Learned
Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore on 02.03.2005. On
13.04.2005 complainant/accused joined investigation after obtaining
interim bail and produced receipts Nos. 1977 dated 24.02.2005 and 1978
dated 25.02.2005 amounting to Rs. 440000/-(300000+140000) deposited
by him in the Government Treasury showing the embezzled amount due
against him to the I.O with his free consent which were taken into
possession by the I.O in presence of witnesses through recovery memo
dated 13.04.2005. On 19.04.2005 interim bail of complainant/accused
was cancelled by the Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption,
Lahore as withdrawn and his arrest was effected by the I.O through Zimni
No. 81 para No. 01 dated 19.04.2005. The Learned Senior Special Judge
Anti   Corruption,     Lahore   vide   order   dated    20.04.2005   sent   the
complainant/accused namely Muhammad Naeem Electrical Supervisor,
TMA Ravi, Lahore to judicial lockup and the case is subjudice in the court
of law.
                The order dated 10.08.2011 passed by your good self as to the
exclusion of the name of complainant namely Ch. Muhammad Naeem
from      the     subject   enquiry     has    been     challenged   thorough
representation/appeal before the Honorable Governor Province of Punjab,
Lahore which is pending for adjudication.


                                                        MUNIR SHAHID
                                                        Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,
    Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                            SHAMS-UD-DIN

                                   VS

             DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC.




      PARAWISE REPLY ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. 01




Respectfully Sheweth:-

     1.    That the contents of para No. 01 are admitted to extent that

           the petition was filed by the petitioner and the Honorable

           Court was pleased to pass an order dated 20.09.2011.

     2.    That the contents of para No. 2 are correct to extent that in

           compliance of court order dated 20.09.2011, Enquiry bearing

           No. 555/2011 initiated in the Anti Corruption Establishment,

           Lahore Region, Lahore and on 06.10.2011 the petitioner and

           defendant No. 02 put their attendance on the order sheet.

     3.    That the contents of para 03 are totally false and frivolous as

           it is mentioned in para No. 02 that enquiry bearing No.

           555/2011 has already been initiated against respondent No.

           02 who has dully made his appearance on 06.10.2011. Copy

           of order sheet is annexed for kind perusal of this Honorable

           Court which is reflective of the fact that the respondent No. 02

           has marked his attendance.

     4.    That the contents of para No. 04 are vehemently denied being

           false.
5.    That the role of respondent No. 02 whether he has committed

           forgery by entering wrong mutation or not shall be determined

           during the course of enquiry.

     6.    That the contents of para No. 06 are fabricated as respondent

           No. 02 appeared in the enquiry firstly on 06.10.2011,

           26.10.2011,      19.11.2011,     21.11.2011     and    lastly     on

           28.11.2011.

     7.    Legal.

                Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the

contempt application being based on false facts and information be kindly

be dismissed.



                                             Deputy Director (Inv-III)
                                          On behalf of respondent (No. 01)
                                          Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                               Lahore Region, Lahore
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMAD THE LEARNED CONSULTANT
    OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB, LAHORE.




REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2988/2011 SUBMITTED BY MALIK
MUHAMMAD SAQIB ANJUM.



Respectfully Sheweth


                I have honor to refer to your notice No. 2988/2011 dated

29.10.2011 on the subject noted above.

                The above titled complaint does not pertain to Anti Corruption

Establishment, Lahore Region rather the same relates to District Narowal

which   falls     within   jurisdiction   of   Anti   Corruption   Establishment,

Gujranwala Region, Gujranwala.

                It is therefore, requested that further correspondence in the

matter may be made with the concerned office.


                                                  Deputy Director (Legal)
                                               Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                   Lahore Region, Lahore.

                No.ACE-LR-2011/                                     Dated:-

                A Copy is forwarded to the Director (Legal), Anti Corruption
Establishment, Punjab, Lahore for information with reference to his memo
No. DG-ACE-DIR-L-(79)-2011/17865 dated 12.11.2011.



                                                  Deputy Director (Legal)
                                               Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                                 Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION
            LAHORE.




In Re: -             Anwaar Hussain Vs The State


              CASE FIR NO. 55/2008 PS, DACE, LAHORE.



Subject:    APPLICATION FOR GRANTING TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF
            CHALLAN U/S 173 CR PC.



Respectfully Sheweth:-

      1.    That the above titled petition is pending adjudication before
            this Honorable Court and is fixed for submission of report u/s
            173 Cr PC for today.
      2.    That the investigation of case FIR No.55/2008 has been
            entrusted to investigating team comprising of undersigned
            Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore by the
            competent authority vide order dated 19.10.2011.
      3.    That the case is complicated and in order to conclude the
            investigation evidence is required to be collected as allegedly
            huge loss to Government exchequer is involved.
      4.    That interest of justice demand that the investigation be
            based on proper evidence and for this purpose appropriate
            time is required.
            In view of above circumstances, it is very humbly prayed that
further appropriate time may be granted for finalization of investigation
and submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC in the best interest of justice.




                                           Deputy Director (Inv-I),
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                             Lahore Region, Lahore



                                          Deputy Director (Legal),
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                             Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




In Re: -    Muhammad Shahbaz Vs The Additional Director                 Anti
            Corruption Lahore Petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC



                      Report on behalf of respondent


Respectfully Sheweth:-

            The facts in brief are that the petitioner submitted a

complaint against Amanat Ullah ASI PS Shahdara Lahore under the

allegation voiced in the petition. On the receipt of the complaint the matter

has been referred to the CCPO for obtaining his comments and report

alongwith the counter version of the ASI. On the receipt of the comments/

report and counter version of the ASI, further proceedings will be

conducted in accordance with law and rules. The petitioner is premature

and is liable to be dismissed.



                                               Representative
                                              Zulafqar Ali (ASI)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                           Lahore Region, Lahore
Naveed tariq
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION LAHORE.




In Re: -             Anwaar Hussain Vs The State


              CASE FIR NO. 55/2008 PS, DACE, LAHORE.



Subject:    APPLICATION FOR GRANTING TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF
            CHALLAN U/S 173 CR PC.



Respectfully Sheweth:-

      5.    That the above titled petition is pending adjudication before
            this Honorable Court and is fixed for submission of report u/s
            173 Cr PC for today.
      6.    That the investigation of case FIR No.55/2008 has been
            entrusted to investigating team comprising of undersigned
            Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore by the
            competent authority vide order dated 19.10.2011.
      7.    That the case is complicated and in order to conclude the
            investigation evidence is required to be collected as allegedly
            huge loss to Government exchequer is involved.
      8.    That interest of justice demand that the investigation be
            based on proper evidence and for this purpose appropriate
            time is required.
            In view of above circumstances, it is very humbly prayed that
further appropriate time may be granted for finalization of investigation
and submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC in the best interest of justice.




   Deputy Director (Legal),               Deputy Director (Inv-I),
Anti Corruption Establishment,         Anti Corruption Establishment,
   Lahore Region, Lahore                   Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




In Re:-     Muhammad Alyas Vs Deputy Director Anti Corruption Lahore
            Petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC




                      Report on behalf of respondent


Respectfully Sheweth:-

            The contention of the petitioner contained in para 2 of the

petition is not correct because the application/complaint annexed with

the petition has never been received in ACE.

            It is therefore, requested that the petitioner may be directed to

attend the ACE alongwith the complaint supported by an affidavit for

further action by the ACE in accordance with ACE Rules 1985.



                                                Representative
                                               Zulafqar Ali (ASI)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                             Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.


                            Maqsood Ahmed

                                   VS

        DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC.


Respectfully Sheweth:-

            Brief facts of the complaint filed by Maqsood Ahmed against
Muhammad Yousaf Khokhar etc are that the father of the complainant
Muhammad Jahangir was owner of property No. NE-XVI-153-S-15/1/RH,
who has died and now the property is in possession of his legal heirs.
Malik Muhammad Ijaz by giving heavy bribe to excise inspector
Muhammad Yousaf Khokhar got prepared a forged PT-1 S-No.5307/1
dated: 01-01-2006 in his name. The complainant requested that the same
may be cancelled.
      On receipt of this complaint the same was marked as complaint
No.1744/2011 in the Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region,
Lahore. After due process and probe the competent authority vide his
order that dated: 02-06-2011 directed to refer the same to the department
and incompliance of that order the instant complaint was referred to
Director General Excise and Taxation vide this office Memo,No.ACE-
LR(C-1744)/2011-4768 dated 10-06-2011 for disposal at their end.
      The complaint has been referred to Excise Department on
02.06.2011 where as the order of this Honourable court was passed on
03-06-2011. In view of the above mentioned circumstances now the
complaint is lying with Director General Excise and Taxation for its
adjudication.
      It is humbly prayed that petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.

                                               Representative
                                              Zulafqar Ali (ASI)
                                    Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                           Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                              ABDUL AZIZ

                                   VS

                 DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE.




Respectfully Sheweth:-

             With profound respect it is humbly submitted that due to the

non receipt of the copy of petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC, the

report/comments have not been submitted in this Honorable Court.

             It is therefore, requested that the copy of the petition may

kindly be ordered to be supplied so that the comments/report could be

submitted.



                                               Representative
                                              Zulafqar Ali (ASI)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                            Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT
 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.




                         MUHAMMMAD MAJEED

                                   VS

                 DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE.




Respectfully Sheweth:-

             With profound respect it is humbly submitted that due to the

non receipt of the copy of petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC, the

report/comments have not been submitted in this Honorable Court.

             It is therefore, requested that the copy of the petition may

kindly be ordered to be supplied so that the comments/report could be

submitted.




                                               Representative
                                              Zulafqar Ali (ASI)
                                        Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                            Lahore Region, Lahore.
To

           The Worthy Director
           Anti Corruption Establishment,
           Lahore Region, Lahore.


Subject:   CASUAL LEAVE


Respected Sir,


           With due respect and profound regards it is submitted

that I have to go to Layyah to look after my father. So, I can not

attend the office on 09.04.2012 to 10.04.2012. Kindly grant me two

days casual leave with permission to leave the station.

           I shall be highly thankful to you.



                                       MALIK NAVEED TARIQ
                                       Assistant Director (Legal)
                                    Anti Corruption Establishment,
                                         Lahore Region, Lahore
L/DDL:-

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

Certificat energetic
Certificat energeticCertificat energetic
Certificat energeticpyratek
 
Numerology And The Workplace
Numerology And The WorkplaceNumerology And The Workplace
Numerology And The WorkplaceKate Alama
 
Tyyni vai ärjyvä Satakunta 2030?
Tyyni vai ärjyvä Satakunta 2030? Tyyni vai ärjyvä Satakunta 2030?
Tyyni vai ärjyvä Satakunta 2030? TimoAro
 
linear_equations_in_two_variables
linear_equations_in_two_variableslinear_equations_in_two_variables
linear_equations_in_two_variablesKripi Mehra
 
Satakunnan asema alueiden välisessä kilpailussa 2000-luvulla
Satakunnan asema alueiden välisessä kilpailussa 2000-luvullaSatakunnan asema alueiden välisessä kilpailussa 2000-luvulla
Satakunnan asema alueiden välisessä kilpailussa 2000-luvullaTimoAro
 
L'App store per applicazioni Enterprise: La mobilità porta a porta
L'App store per applicazioni Enterprise: La mobilità porta a portaL'App store per applicazioni Enterprise: La mobilità porta a porta
L'App store per applicazioni Enterprise: La mobilità porta a portaMicrofocusitalia
 
KAUPUNKIEN JA KAUPUNKISEUTUJEN MERKITYS IH-ALUEITA MUODOSTETTAESSA
KAUPUNKIEN JA KAUPUNKISEUTUJEN MERKITYS IH-ALUEITA MUODOSTETTAESSAKAUPUNKIEN JA KAUPUNKISEUTUJEN MERKITYS IH-ALUEITA MUODOSTETTAESSA
KAUPUNKIEN JA KAUPUNKISEUTUJEN MERKITYS IH-ALUEITA MUODOSTETTAESSATimoAro
 
Kuntauudistus pähkinänkuoressa
Kuntauudistus pähkinänkuoressaKuntauudistus pähkinänkuoressa
Kuntauudistus pähkinänkuoressaTimoAro
 
Workplace profitability
Workplace profitabilityWorkplace profitability
Workplace profitabilityKate Alama
 
10 MYYTTIÄ JA FAKTAA KUNTAUUDISTUKSESTA
10 MYYTTIÄ JA FAKTAA KUNTAUUDISTUKSESTA10 MYYTTIÄ JA FAKTAA KUNTAUUDISTUKSESTA
10 MYYTTIÄ JA FAKTAA KUNTAUUDISTUKSESTATimoAro
 
2 BHK and 3 BHK Flats in Market Yard Pune - Gagan Developers (Signet)
2 BHK and 3 BHK Flats in Market Yard Pune - Gagan Developers (Signet)2 BHK and 3 BHK Flats in Market Yard Pune - Gagan Developers (Signet)
2 BHK and 3 BHK Flats in Market Yard Pune - Gagan Developers (Signet)gagandevelopers
 

Destaque (18)

Certificat energetic
Certificat energeticCertificat energetic
Certificat energetic
 
135260576
135260576135260576
135260576
 
Jk world his.
Jk world his.Jk world his.
Jk world his.
 
Bai bao cao
Bai bao caoBai bao cao
Bai bao cao
 
Numerology And The Workplace
Numerology And The WorkplaceNumerology And The Workplace
Numerology And The Workplace
 
Tyyni vai ärjyvä Satakunta 2030?
Tyyni vai ärjyvä Satakunta 2030? Tyyni vai ärjyvä Satakunta 2030?
Tyyni vai ärjyvä Satakunta 2030?
 
linear_equations_in_two_variables
linear_equations_in_two_variableslinear_equations_in_two_variables
linear_equations_in_two_variables
 
бьюти
бьютибьюти
бьюти
 
Satakunnan asema alueiden välisessä kilpailussa 2000-luvulla
Satakunnan asema alueiden välisessä kilpailussa 2000-luvullaSatakunnan asema alueiden välisessä kilpailussa 2000-luvulla
Satakunnan asema alueiden välisessä kilpailussa 2000-luvulla
 
Kids bean bags
Kids bean bagsKids bean bags
Kids bean bags
 
L'App store per applicazioni Enterprise: La mobilità porta a porta
L'App store per applicazioni Enterprise: La mobilità porta a portaL'App store per applicazioni Enterprise: La mobilità porta a porta
L'App store per applicazioni Enterprise: La mobilità porta a porta
 
KAUPUNKIEN JA KAUPUNKISEUTUJEN MERKITYS IH-ALUEITA MUODOSTETTAESSA
KAUPUNKIEN JA KAUPUNKISEUTUJEN MERKITYS IH-ALUEITA MUODOSTETTAESSAKAUPUNKIEN JA KAUPUNKISEUTUJEN MERKITYS IH-ALUEITA MUODOSTETTAESSA
KAUPUNKIEN JA KAUPUNKISEUTUJEN MERKITYS IH-ALUEITA MUODOSTETTAESSA
 
Kuntauudistus pähkinänkuoressa
Kuntauudistus pähkinänkuoressaKuntauudistus pähkinänkuoressa
Kuntauudistus pähkinänkuoressa
 
Brand You
Brand YouBrand You
Brand You
 
Workplace profitability
Workplace profitabilityWorkplace profitability
Workplace profitability
 
Blogg
BloggBlogg
Blogg
 
10 MYYTTIÄ JA FAKTAA KUNTAUUDISTUKSESTA
10 MYYTTIÄ JA FAKTAA KUNTAUUDISTUKSESTA10 MYYTTIÄ JA FAKTAA KUNTAUUDISTUKSESTA
10 MYYTTIÄ JA FAKTAA KUNTAUUDISTUKSESTA
 
2 BHK and 3 BHK Flats in Market Yard Pune - Gagan Developers (Signet)
2 BHK and 3 BHK Flats in Market Yard Pune - Gagan Developers (Signet)2 BHK and 3 BHK Flats in Market Yard Pune - Gagan Developers (Signet)
2 BHK and 3 BHK Flats in Market Yard Pune - Gagan Developers (Signet)
 

Último

Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxKatherine Villaluna
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfYu Kanazawa / Osaka University
 
PISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptx
PISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptxPISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptx
PISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptxEduSkills OECD
 
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.raviapr7
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphNetziValdelomar1
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?TechSoup
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxIn - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxAditiChauhan701637
 
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfHED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfMohonDas
 
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfMaximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfTechSoup
 
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfDiploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfMohonDas
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxraviapr7
 
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICEQuality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICESayali Powar
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxDr. Asif Anas
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...CaraSkikne1
 
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE
 
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17Celine George
 

Último (20)

Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
 
PISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptx
PISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptxPISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptx
PISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptx
 
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
 
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxIn - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
 
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfHED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
 
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfMaximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
 
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfDiploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
 
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quizFinals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
 
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICEQuality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
 
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
 
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
 
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
 

Naveed tariq

  • 1. Kindly refer to final report submitted by Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation) ACE Lahore Region Lahore. Brief facts of the case are that Case FIR No. 541/2009, offence u/s 420/468/471 PPC, Police Station Kahna Lahore was registered and investigated by local police and report u/s 173 Cr. PC was submitted by the local police after having found the accused guilty of the offence ans submit report u/s 173 Cr. PC to the prosecutor but report u/s 173 Cr. PC was sent back with the observation by the Assistant District Public Prosecutor, with thye observation that public servant i.e. Muhammad Slaeem Patwari is involved in the commission of offence. So, the case was transferred to this establishment. The accused public servant has been expired as per report of IO of local police namely Muhammad Akram ASI. The remaining accused persons are on bail. Judicial action as recommended by the IO in his final report may be approved against Nazir Ahmad, Abdul Rauf, Muhammad Sharif, Sadiq and Muhammad Akbar. Accused Muhammad Saleem Patwari has been expired so criminal proceeding against him automatically stand abated. However, Investigating Officer before submission of challan u/s 173 Cr. PC, following documents may be taken into possession:- 1. Statement of present Halqa Patwari. 2. Attested copies of mutations in question. 3. Death Certificate of Muhammad Saleem Patwari (Deceased) MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. L/DDP:-
  • 2. Kindly refer to Para No. 12 to 17-N and final report dated 11.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACE Head Quarter Lahore. Earlier final report was submitted by Mr. SD Khalid the then DDI-III, ACE Lahore, for approval of judicial action against 12 accused but legal branch raised some legal objection that determine the role of each accused person, collect the evidence and record their statements u/s 161 Cr. PC. Meanwhile after the transfer of Mr. SD Khalid the then DDI-III, ACE Lahore, file was transferred to Circle Officer Head Quarter for removal of objection raised by legal branch and submission of RFR. I have examine the file and found that CO/IO has not fulfill the requirement as raised by legal branch and record the statement of only one accused namely Mushtaq Girdawar. Investigating Officer is directed to determine the role of each accused, record their statements u/s 161 Cr. PC, collect attested copies of mutations and sale deeds in question and submit RFR on merits, if agreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. L/DDP:-
  • 3. Kindly refer to Para No. 5 to 7-N and revised final report dated 30.04.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACE Head Quarter Lahore. Earlier Judicial Action against Nasir Rauf, Muhammad Arshad, Patwari, Muhammad Umair, Muhammad Akram and Departmental action against Rasheed Ahmad, Patwari, Muhammad Mansha, Girdawar, Saman Jan Tehsildar was approved by the competent authority on 12.03.2012. Meanwhile Muhammad Arshad, Patwari submitted an application before Worthy Director stating, thathe was not called to submit his defense verion and in he also submitted some reports of revenue officials in his favour, on which Worthy Director ask Ciricle Officer Head Quarter for comments/report who after recording the version of Muhammad Arshad Patwari, submitted a revised final report declaring him innocent in this case. IO has already submitted an incomplete challan on 21.03.2012 in the court. Now he recommended to submit the complete report u/s 173 Cr. PC, putting Muhammad Arshad Patwari in coloumn No.2 of report u/s 173 Cr. PC. I have gone through the record and final report dated 12.03.2012, I endorse the recommendation of the IO and I.O may be directed to submit cancellation report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court of competent jurisdiction at the earliest, if agreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. L/DDP:-
  • 4. Kindly refer to Para No. 10 to 13-N and final report dated 15.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Hassan Raza Khan DDI ACE and Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACE Head Quarter Lahore. Earlier Judicial Action against Shahzad Ahmad constable and Departmental action against Ghulam Abbas Inspector and Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal) was recommended by Mr. Riaz Ahmad Assistant Director Investigation in his final report dated 12.04.2012, but subsequently His Lordship Mr. Justice Mazahir Ali Akbar Naqvi called Worthy Director General ACE Punjab on 08.05.2012, who undertakes for constituting a team to investigate the issue and submit report in this regard within seven days and Worthy DG ACE Punjab constituted team comprising Mr. Hassan Raza DDI ACE Lahore and Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer Head Quarter, Lahore. They after conducting Investigation submitted a Final Report Dated 15.05.2012 and they differ with the opinion of previous IO and recommended Judicial Action against Shahzad Ahmad constable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector and dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal). After examining the record it transpired that earlier on 09.02.2012 Mr. Zaffar Iqbal Judicial MagistrateSection-30, discharged the accused namely Ghulam Abbas inspector on 09.02.2012 stating as under:- “It is clear from the record that till yet no material evidence has been collected against the accused regarding the commission of offence with malafide intention and it is not in the interest of justice to curtail his liberty by sending him to judicial lock up. Hence, at this juncture, he is discharged in this case. He is responsible public servant and there is no chance of his escape. I.O. may take legal action against him in accordance with law if he finds any material evidence against him during investigation. Accused be released if not required in any other case.” I have gone through the record and final report dated 15.05.2012, it reveals from order dated 25.11.2011 of Honorable Lahore High Court, Lahore it was the responsibility of Ghulam Abbas Inspector to hand over the parcel containing material importanat documents himself, negligence and criminal misconduct
  • 5. is available against both the accused namely Shahzad Ahmad constable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector. Judical action against Shahzad Ahmad constable has already been recommended. Now investigating team has recommended Judicial Action against Ghulam Abbas Inspector also and dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal). I endorse the recommendation of the investigating team and recommend Judicial Action against Ghulam Abbas Inspector and dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal), if agreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. L/DDP:- The final report, opinion of ADP & file have been perused. I endorse the opinion of ADP to approve judicial action against Ghulam Abbas, Inspector & to drop the case against the Ejaz Hussain Gilani, DSP as he performed his duty diligently judicial action against Shahzad Ahmed, Constable has already been approved. DEPUTY DIRECTOR (PROSECUTION) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. W/DIRECTOR:-
  • 6. Kindly refer to final report dated 30.04.2012, submitted by Mr. Shafaqat Ali circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura. Brief facts of the case of that one Syed Basharat Ali submitted an application before circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura for raid against Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari Halqa Madhkay on 23.04.2012 . After getting permission from learned District & Sesions Judge Sheikhupura, who deputed Mr. Rana Sohail Learned Judicial Magistrate to conduct the raid as per law. Learned Magistrate after conducting the raid ordered to register a criminal case against the said accused and then in compliance with the order of learned Judicial Magistrate Circle Officer registered FIR No. 15/2012 offence u/s 161 PPC read with 5/2/47 PCA at Police Station ACE Sheikhupura. Perusal of the record reveals that complainant has no personal work with the accused and has personal grudge with the accused Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari and Learned Magistrate in his raid proceeding at page 3 admitted that he was 10 feet away when the complainant handed over the money and he has not hear the conversation between them. According to the statement of the accused Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari, complainant has borrowed Rs. 2000/0 from him, he further stated that complainant called me and asked for returning my money back and when I came he put the money in my pocket and the raiding party arrest me without listening any conversation. Previous motive behind the false implication of accused has also been established during the course of investigation as it has transpired from the record that complainant intended to get transferred/inherited the land measuring 6 Murabas inherited by his deceased brother. On the plea that the female legal heirs left by the deceased are not Muslim. But the Patwari inherited the property
  • 7. in accordance with shia law in their favour. So complainant being aggrieved by this act of Patwari registered a case against him. During the course of investigation complainant differed from his previous statement and filed an affidavit where in he admitted that he has revenge against the accused he registered a case against Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari and now he is not interested to pursue the case, he further stated that he has no objection to drop the said case. Circle Officer/IO has submitted his final report and stated that prosecution is wastage of time and he recommended to drop the case. I do hereby agree with the opinion of IO and and recommend to drop the case and intiate the proceeding u/s 182 Cr.PCagainst the complainant Syed Basharat Ali who wasted the precious time of the agency, if agreed please. Hence, dropping the case as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed to submit cancellation report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court of competent jurisdiction at the earliest. Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if agreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. L/DDP:- The file as well as opinion of AD(P) has been examined. The defense plea taken by the accused was firstly recorded by the raiding Magistrate and is established from record i.e. mutation NO. 540 dated 18.05.2011 is also corroborated by the resiling affidavit of complainant. In view of the recommendations of AD(P) at para No. 16 are endorsed. ASIF ANJUM WARRAICH (DDP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. W/DIRECTOR:-
  • 8. Kindly refer to para no. 37 to 43, 54 to 56 and revised final report submitted by Mr. Shafaqat Ali Circle Officer ACE Sheikhupura. Brief facts of the case are that complainant, Muhammad Ijaz s/o Muhammad Latif filed a petition u/s 22-A & 22-B Cr. PC alleging that he purchased 8-Kanals land from Sarfraz Ahmad, General Attorney on behalf of Ghazanfar Ali, but the sale deed was got registered from the original owner Ghazanfar Ali vide Documents No. 13275, Book No.1, Volume No. 2548, Dated: 08.09.2005 and Halqa Patwari Gulfam Akhtar, after taking bribe money entered mutation No. 3564 dated: 17.08.2005 in his favour and same was attested by RO. He further alleged that Halqa Patwari, Gulfam Akhtar with connivance of Ghazanfar Ali Seller, Arif Hussain and Sarfraz Ahmad, prepare a forged Fard of his land and sell the same to Arif Hussain through General Power of Attorney vide Document No. 170 Book No.1, Volume No. 2733, Dated 10.01.2007 and he entered mutation No. 3814 Dated 17.02.2007 accordingly. Halqa Patwari while preparing record of rights in year 2006-2007, malafidely entered the no of junior mutation No. 3814 of Arif Hussain inspite of his senior mutation No. 3564. After enquiry, case FIR No. 10/2010 dated 20.05.2010, offence u/s 420/468/471/109 PPC read with section 5/2/47 PCA was registered against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Sarfraz Ahmad General Power of Attorney Ghazanfar Ali original Seller at PS ACE Sheikhupura, it was further approved that role of Mr. Riasat Ali Girdawar and Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar shall be determined during the investigation. After completion of investigation, the then DDI-III recommended Judicial action against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Ghazanfar Ali Original Seller, Arif Hussain Purchaser and departmental action against Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat Ali Girdawar. the file was examined by ADL and DDL who differed with the opinion of I/O. On their recommendations J/A was approved against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Ghazanfar Ali (Vendor/Beneficiary), Sarfraz Ahmad GPA and departmental action against Riasat Ali Girdawar and Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar.
  • 9. After approval of Judicial Action bail before arrest was moved by one accused namely Gulfam Akhtar which was dismissed by Special Judge Anti-Corruption and Lahore High Court Lahore as well. Subsequently accused Gulfam Akhtar moved an application to worthy Director General ACE Punjab for reinvestigation on 16.12.2011 and complainant Muhammad Ijaz also moved an application to worthy Director General ACE Punjab for reinvestigation to determine the role of Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat Ali Girdawar. On the said applications worthy Director General ACE Punjab ordered for reinvestigation of the case and the investigation again marked to Circle Officer ACE Sheikhupura, who recorded the statements u/s 161 Cr. PC of Muhammad Nawaz present Patwari Mouza Mandiali, Malik Rafaqat Ali Present Naib- Tehsildar, Gulfam Akhtar (accused), Sarfraz Ahmad GPA (accused), Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar (accused) and the statement of the complainant Muhammad Ijaz as well. Statements of the complainant and prosecution witnesses wherein fully corroborated the allegations leveled in the complainant. Now Circle Officer has further recommended judicial action against Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Malik Riasat Ali Girdawar against whom D/A was approved. In this way, now I.O recommends judicial action against all the accused Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat Ali Girdawar, Ghazanfar Ali (Vendor/ Beneficiary), Arif Hussain Purchaser. Judicial action as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed to submit report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court at the earliest. Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if agreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. L/DDP:-
  • 10. Brief facts of the case of that a case FIR No. 514/2009 u/ s 496-A, 380 PPC PS Chunian District Kasur was registered against Muhammad Shammoon etc. The investigation was with Fateh Sher ASI. The present complainant who is a real brother of one of the accused of the said case, alleges that Fateh Sher, ASI, demanded and received Rs. 370000/- to declare his brother innocent in the said case but did not do the needful rather. The said case was cancelled after investigation conducted by Superintendent of Police District Kasur. After preliminary enquiry No. 217/2010-KSR, FIR No. 18/2011 PS Anti Corruption Establishment, Kasur was registered. Firstly the investigation was conducted by Circle Officer Anti Corruption Establishment Kasur, who recorded the statements of the complainant and prosecution witnesses wherein they fully corroborated the allegations leveled in the complainant. Afterwards the investigation wsa entrusted to DDI ACE, Lahore. During the pendency of investigation the accused got pre-arrest bail. During the hearing of bail petition, the complainant appeared before the court and stated that his compromise has been affected with the accused. On his statement, bail was confirmed by the court. Now DDI has recommended to approve judicial action. As the pre-arrest bail has been confirmed by court and the court has also recorded the statement of complainant. Hence, judicial action as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed to submit report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court at the earliest. Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if agreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. L/DDP:-
  • 11. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1027/2012, BY MALIK IFTIKHAR AHMAD S/O MALIK FEROZ ALI R/O 179/D, GUJAR COLONY, CHUNGI AMARSIDHU, LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments are given as under:-. Brief facts are that one Malik Iftikhar Ahmad has leveled allegation of corruption against Qasim Shah Secretary Union Council No. 139, Green Town, Lahore etc vide written complaint No. 3022/2011. After receiving complaint No. 3022/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted and the said complaint was converted into regular inquiry vide Enquiry No. 483/2011 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmad Assistant Director (Investigation), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore. That after probing the matter on full length and hearing both the parties Assistant Director (Inv) has recommended departmental Action against the delinquents. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the redressal of the complainant has been made accordingly. The complaint in hand may be filed. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 12. Subject: REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUS DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE BRFORE ISRAR AHMAD KHAN CONSULTANT-IV OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN LAHORE. Kindly refer to subject cited above, it is humbly submitted that above mentioned complaint was fixed for hearing today i.e. 15.05.2012, in which next date of hearing is 06.06.2012. That I have attended the office of learned consultant and Honorable Consultant has directed to conclude the matter before 06.06.2012. (Original Notice No. 2604 Dated 07.05.2012 is attached) That re-investigation of case FIR No. 239/11, Police Station Kot Radha Kishan District Kasur is pending before the Circle Officer Head Quarter, Lahore. Kindly direct the said officer to conclude the matter before 06.06.2012 and submit his report on 06.06.2012. Submitted for further necessary action please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADL-V) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. W/DDL
  • 13. To, The Worthy Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Subject: PROGRESS REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 1153/2012 Respected Sir, It is respectfully submitted that I attended the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore on 13-04-2012, in contempt petition / Application titled Shahid Siddique VS Director ACE, Lahore. That detail report was submitted by Rana Tariq Mahmood Deputy Director Legal on 11.04.2012 as per direction of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. That on 13-04-2012 Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore has passed an order and dismisses the said petition/Application. (Copy of orders is attached) Submitted for necessary further action please. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore. L/DDL
  • 14. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 848/2012, BY IQBAL HUSSAIN S/O MUSA R/O MODEL TOWN, LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments are given as under:-. That the complainant has filed an application before your good office and alleged that his properties situates at Kot Addu district Muzaffar Garh, Jampur district Rajanpur, Kot Chutta District Dera Ghazi Khan and concerned patwaris has prepared forged documents of above mentioned properties. The complainant further alleged that he filed an application before Anti-Corruption Department on 24th February 2012 but no material steps has been taken by the Anti-Corruption Department. It is pertinent to mention here that above allegations are within the jurisdiction of Anti-Corruption Establishment, Dera Ghazi Khan Region and complainant never filed any application before the office of the respondent/Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore and report of the above complaint may be sought from Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Dera Ghazi Khan Region. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 15. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. GHULAM MURTAZA VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts are that one Ghulam Murtaza has leveled allegations against Tehsildar Halqa Niaz Beg and others vide complaint No. 12/2012 in the office of the respondent. That according to Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985, preliminary inquiry was conducted by Ch. Maqbool Ahmad Assistant Director (Inv). Who after examining the record submitted his final report and recommended to drop the said complaint on 08.03.2012, because the civil litigation is pending between the parties. That on the recommendations of the Investigating officer competent authority/respondent has dropped the said complaint on 21.03.2012. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 16. To, The Worthy Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Subject: REPORT IN `PETITION U/S 22-A & 22-B, FILED BY MIAN SARFRAZ JAWA ADVOCATE Respected Sir, It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the report/comments in the court of Mr. Abdul Sattar Langah Sb Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Lahore on 12-04-2012. That Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge has directed as under:- “In view of comments submitted by Assistant Director Legal, Anti- Corruption Establishment, Lahore, the respondents are directed to get record the verbatim statement of the petitioner and redress the grievance of the petitioner as per rules and law”(Attested copy of the orders is attached herewith) Submitted for necessary further action please. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore. L/DDL
  • 17. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. NASIR MAQBOOL VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Tauqeer has leveled allegation of corruption against Nasir Maqbool Qureshi etc. That regular enquiry No. 98/2012 dated 09.02.2012 was entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director Investigation. That Investigating officer has recorded the version of both the parties. The petitioner has joined the Inquiry and on last date of hearing he requested for adjournment. That said enquiry is still pending due to lack of interest of the petitioner. That further action on the said enquiry may be taken as per Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petitioner may be directed to join the enquiry. So that the matter be concluded as per law. In this circumstances petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 18. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF ABDUL SATTAR LANGAH LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MIAN SARFRAZ AFTAB JAWA VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that on the written complaint of Mian Sarfraz Aftab Jawa Advocate, preliminary inquiry was conducted by the competent authority. That Mian Sarfraz Aftab Jawa Advocate has leveled allegation of corruption against Serwar Si PS Mangamandi, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 997/12, preliminary enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-997)2012/5008 dated 22.03.2012, sought comments from CCPO, Lahore. (Copy enclosed) The redressal of grievance of the petitioner is under process and after receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore further action will be taken as per Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be disposed of. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 19. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMAD YASIN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Yasin has leveled allegation of corruption against ASI Mushtaq Ahmad etc PS Baghbanpura, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 126/12, preliminary enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its letter No. ACE-LR-(C-126)2012/1283-1284 dated 24.01.2012 seeking comments from CCPO, Lahore. That after receiving the comments from CCPO Lahore competent authority has converted the complaint in to regular inquiry vide Inquiry No. 212/2012 on 27.03.2012 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation). The grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and further action may be taken as per law. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 20. To, The Worthy Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Subject: REPORT IN FIR NO. 200/2009, OFFENCE U/S 420 Respected Sir, It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the report/comments in the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore today i.e. 29-03-2012, in contempt petition titled Shahid Siddique VS Director ACE, Lahore. That Learned District and Sessions Judge has directed to record the version of the petitioner and decide the matter as per law before 11.04.2012. That detail report will be submitted on 11.04.2012 as per direction of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. Kindly direct the concerned officer to decide the matter as early as possible. So that the report be submitted on 11.04.2012 in the court. Submitted for necessary further action please. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore. L/DDL
  • 21. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MALIK MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts are that one Muhammad Shahbaz son of Muhammad Hanif has leveled allegations against Mian Absar DSP Circle Masti Gate and others vide complaint No. 559/2012 in the office of the respondent. That according to Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985, preliminary inquiry is being conduct by the office of respondent and in this regard comments were sought from CCPO, Lahore vide Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-559)-2012/3032 & 3033 Dated 23-02-2012. That the preliminary enquiry is entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Inv) on 21-03-2012. Who has called both the parties to record their version on 04-04-2012. In view of above mentioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the applicant may be directed to attend the office of the Enquiry Officer on 04-04-2012. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 22. |To, The Worthy Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Subject: PROGRESS REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 1153/2012 Respected Sir, It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the report/comments in the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore today i.e. 29-03-2012, in contempt petition titled Shahid Siddique VS Director ACE, Lahore. That Learned District and Sessions Judge has directed to record the version of the petitioner and decide the matter as per law before 11.04.2012. That detail report will be submitted on 11.04.2012 as per direction of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. Kindly direct the concerned officer to decide the matter as early as possible. So that the report be submitted on 11.04.2012 in the court. Submitted for necessary further action please. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore. L/DDL
  • 23. DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. To, The Haji Rana Fawad Ahmad Circle Officer, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. No. ACE-DDL-2012/ Dated: Subject: COMPLAINT NO. 357-1-12 FILED BY HAJI LIAQAT ALI R/O DISTRICT LAHORE- IN THE OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB I am directed to inform you by the office of the Learned Ombudsman Punjab as under:- That one Haji Liaqat Ali S/O Hussain Khan filed a complaint No. 357/1/12, against you before Ombudsman Punjab leveling some allegations of faulty investigation.(Copy of application is attached) That the complainant states that matter in case FIR No. 1916/2011, offence under section 420,468,471 PPC read with section 5/2/47 of PCA, Police Station Kahna, Lahore was under your investigation and you have not completed your investigation on merit. That in this regards Memo No. DAC-DD(Legal-19)2012/2699 Dated 10.02.2012 was also received from Deputy Director Legal, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Punjab Lahore, wherein he has directed for submission of report& parawise comments in the said case. (Copy of Letter is attached) That the complaint was lastly fixed for hearing on 26.03.2012 and the same was adjourned for 25-04-2012 You are therefore required to appear before Mr. Israr Ahmad Learned Consultant-IV, office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore along with written reply/parawise comments without any delay. (MALIK NAVEED TARIQ) Assistant Director (Legal), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore. Copy for information:- 1. P.A. to Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. 2. P.A. to Director General Anti-Corruption Establishment, Punjab, Lahore.
  • 24. DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE To, The Assistant Director (D), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Pubjab, Lahore. No. ACE-LR-(E-598/11/L)-2012/ Dated: Subject: COMMUNICATION OF ORDERS OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB TO THE AGENCY ABOUT NON-COMPLIANCE OF DIRECTION Kindly refer to your office Endst. No. DAC-CR-ML-65-12/3409 dated 21.02.2012, on the subject cited above. In compliance with the orders of Worthy Director General conveyed to the undersigned through endorsement under reference the requisite report has been submitted in the office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore will be submitted on 28.03.2012. Copy of report is enclosed herewith for your kind information. DEPUTY DIRESTOR (LEGAL) ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
  • 25. DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE To, The Assistant Director (D), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Pubjab, Lahore. No. ACE-LR-(E-598/11/L)-2012/ Dated: Subject: COMMUNICATION OF ORDERS OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB TO THE AGENCY ABOUT NON-COMPLIANCE OF DIRECTION Kindly refer to your office Endst. No. DAC-CR-ML-65-12/3409 dated 21.02.2012, on the subject cited above. In compliance with the orders of Worthy Director General conveyed to the undersigned through endorsement under reference the requisite report has been submitted in the office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore on 28.03.2012. Copy of report submitted in the office of Ombudsman Punjab is enclosed herewith for your kind information. DEPUTY DIRESTOR (LEGAL) ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE
  • 26. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. MUHAMMAD IRSHAD VS DIRECTORE GENERAL ANT-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT. SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 706/2012 Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments are given as under:-. Brief facts of the complaint are that Enquiry NO. 197/2010, against Muhammad Irshad EST Govt. Elementary School Maher Chand Wala District Kasur was under probe in the office of Deputy Director, ACE Kasur and Circle Officer Kasur was Enquiry Officer in the said complaint. That it is pertinent to mention here that the said Enquiry Officer has recommended for dropping the said inquiry and the same is still pending for final approval of the competent authority. It is further submitted that allegations of harassment by the complainant are baseless. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 27. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. BAGH ALI BHATTI VS DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1159/2011 Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments had already been submitted in complaint No. 4776/2010, which was on the same subject matter. Brief facts of the case are that FIR NO. 02/2011 at Police Station ACE Lahore was lodged on the complaint of Bagh Ali Bhatti. After lodging the FIR the matter was investigated by the circle officer Head Quarter, Lahore and the investigating officer after investigation declare the accused persons innocent and discharged the accused persons. That the investigating officer has submitted the discharge report under section 173 CR.PC in the competent court vide Road Certificate No. 55/21, dated 16.01.2012. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand has become infectious and the complainant may be directed to approach the concerned court and the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 28. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. BAGH ALI BHATTI VS DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 4776/2010 Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are given as under. Brief facts of the case are that FIR NO. 02/2011 at Police Station ACE Lahore was lodged on the complaint of Bagh Ali Bhatti. After lodging the FIR the matter was investigated by the circle officer Head Quarter, Lahore and the investigating officer after investigation declare the accused persons innocent and discharged the accused persons. That the investigating officer has submitted the discharge report under section 173 CR.PC in the competent court vide Road Certificate No. 55/21, dated 16.01.2012. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand has become infectious and the complainant may be directed to approach the concerned court and the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 29. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. TANVEER MAHMOOD VS DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 3419/2011 Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are given as under. Brief facts of the case are that one Tanveer Mahmood has filed a complaint No. 3419/2011. He submitted in his complaint that he has submitted an application before respondent vide Enquiry No. 42/2011, but the respondent No. 1, is not interested to proceed further. That after perusal of the record it reveals that the said Enquiry is relating to somew one else and is not related to the complainant Tanveer Mahmood. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 30. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. NAZAR ELAHI VS DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1988/6/11 Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are given as under. Brief facts are that one Nazar Elahi has leveled allegation of corruption against Akhtar Hussain Stenographer vide written complaint No. 159/2011. After receiving complaint No. 159/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted and the said complaint was converted into regular inquiry vide Enquiry No. 31/2011 and the same was entrusted to Deputy Director (Investigation), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Okara. That after probing the matter on full length and hearing both the parties Deputy Director (Inv), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Okara has recommended for dropping the said enquiry and the competent authority dropped the same on 27.02.2012, vide letter No. ACE-LR- (E-31/11/OK)-2012/323 That allegations of corruption was not proved by the complainant Nazar Elahi, against the respondent Akhtar Hussain In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 31. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. RANA ANWAR HUSSAIN VS RANA IRSLAN KHAN SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 4016/11 Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are given as under. That complainant has leveled some personal allegations against the then Circle Officer Rana Irslan Khan who is repatriated to his parent department and the said complaint was filed after the repatriation of the said delinquent official. That said delinquent is now serving in Motorway Police, he can explain the allegations himself and office of the Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore has no concern with the said delinquent official. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 32. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. HIDAYAT BIBI VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Mst. Hadayat Bibi has leveled allegation of corruption against 1) Muhammad Jahngir 2) Muhammad Saleem, Secretary Union Council Sultan Mahmood No. 38, Lahore 3) Administrator Union Council Sultan Mahmood No. 38, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3887/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted and prima facie allegations of corruptions were made out. That competent authority/respondent has approved regular enquiry against above mentioned accused persons and complaint No. 3887/11 was converted into regular enquiry vide enquiry No. 45/2012 dated 21.01.2012 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazai Assistant Director (Inv) on 21.01.2012. The investigating officer has issued notice both the parties for 10.03.2012. The petitioner alongwith her witnesses may join the investigation for recording her statement and matter will be decided after hearing both the parties on merit. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 33. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. ALLAH DITTA VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Allah Ditta has filed a petition under section 22-A & 22-B for compliance of order of this Honorable Court Dated 04.10.2011. He further submitted that he has submitted an application alongwith order of this Honorable Court vide Diary No. 5264/2011, Dated 28.11.2011 but the respondent No. 1, is not interested to proceed further. After perusal of the record it reveals that an application submitted by petitioner was already decided vide enquiry No. 237/2011. The said enquiry was decided by Assistant Director (Investigation) and the same was dropped vide letter NO. ACE-LR-(E-237/2011/L)2011/11318 dated 03.11.2011. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 34. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMAD YASIN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Yasin has leveled allegation of corruption against ASI Mushtaq Ahmad etc PS Baghbanpura, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 126/12, preliminary enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its letter No. ACE-LR-(C-126)2012/1283-1284 dated 24.01.2012 seeking comments from CCPO, Lahore. The redressal of grievance of the petitioner is under process and after receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore further action may be taken as per law. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 35. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Ishaq has leveled allegation of corruption against SI Muhammad Younis PS Garhi Shahu Lahore etc. After receiving complaint No. 3833/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3833) 2011/13136 dated 24.12.2011 seeking comments from CCPO, Lahore. The redressal of grievance of the petitioner is under process and after receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore further action may be taken as per law. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 36. Subject: REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUS DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE BRFORE ISRAR AHMAD KHAN CONSULTANT-IV OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN LAHORE. Kindly refer to subject cited above, it is humbly submitted that above mentioned complaint was fixed for hearing on 22.02.2012, in which next date of hearing is 10.03.2012. That Honorable Consultant has adjourned the said complaint for 10.03.2012 with the direction to conclude the matter till next date of hearing. Submitted for further necessary action please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADL-V) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. W/DDL
  • 37. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. KAMRAN AFZAL VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Kamran Afzal has leveled allegation of corruption against SI Asghar Ali PS Shahdra Town, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 4031/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted by the Deputy Director (Inv-I), both the parties were summoned for 03.01.12. Despite of calling again and again the complainant Kamran Afzal could not appear before the Deputy Director Investigation. The respondent Asghar Ali SI stated that the complainant conducts the gambling at club and he as per law registered FIR No. 1259/11 and recovery was also affected from him. He further states that the complainant is blackmailing just to avoid the further proceedings. The allegation of corruption against Asghar Ali SI was not proved in the said preliminary enquiry. That allegation of corruption was not proved against the respondent SI Asghar Ali competent authority dropped the complaint on 06.01.2012. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 38. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMAD ARIF VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Arif has leveled allegation of corruption against Asif Ali Patwari Halqa Manga Mandi Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 2055/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted by Deputy Director (Inv-III) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Respondent Asif Ali Patwari denied the allegations regarding receipt of illegal gratification of Rs. 5000/- for issuance of Fard. He stated that the land is still in the name of Sardar Bibi (Mother of the complainant and inheritance mutation of the mother of the complainant has not yet been sanctioned. He further stated that he advised the complainant that inheritance mutation may be sanctioned from competent authority before issuance of Fard and the complainant get angry and he filed this application malafidely. Prima facie allegations of taking illegal gratification could not be established, even then competent authority has referred the matter in question to the Assistant Commissioner for enquiry and necessary action as per law, vide letter No. ACE-LR-(C-2055) 2011/10033 dated 05.10.2011. The petitioner may approach to the Assistant Commissioner. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 39. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUNAWAR KHAN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Munawar Khan has leveled allegation of corruption against SI Muhammad Yasin PS Civil Line, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3396/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted and letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3396) 2011/11582 dated 15.11.2011 and Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3396) 2011/11962 dated 24.11.2011 was sent to CCPO Lahore for enquiry report which was received vide Diary No. 1659/MISC/CC/CCPO Dated 16.12.2011 in which inquiry officer stated that ……………“business relation has been existed between complainant and Mian Autos. During Investigation complainant has withdraw his application and denied any claim against SI Muhammad Yasin”……, and allegation of corruption against Muhammad Yasin SI was not proved in the said enquiry conducted by Superintendent of Police Investigation Civil Line Division, Lahore. That being non-disclosure of allegations and allegations of corruption was not proved by the complainant Munawar Khan against the respondent SI Muhammad Yasin competent authority dropped the complaint on 06.01.2012. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 40. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MIAN QAISAR AZIZ VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Mian Qaisar Aziz has leveled allegation of corruption against SI Waseem PS Lower Mall, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3239/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted and letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3239) 2011/13070 dated 24.12.2011 was sent to CCPO Lahore for enquiry which was received vide Diary No. 178/MISC/CC/CCPO Dated 28.01.2011 and allegation against Waseem SI proved in the said enquiry conducted by Superintendent of Police Investigation Iqbal Town Division, Lahore. That respondent approved regular enquiry against Waeem SI vide regular enquiry No. 113/2012 dated 13.02.2012 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmad Ch. Assistant Director (Inv) on 21.02.2012. The investigating officer has issued notice both the parties for 10.03.2012. The petitioner may approach to the investigating officer for recording his statement and matter will be decided after hearing both the parties on merit. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 41. BEFORE MUZAFFAR MEHMOOD GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB SECRETARY AUQAF & RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS DEPARTMETN Subject: NOTE FOR PERSONAL HEARING IN THE PREPRESENTATION FILED BY DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE AGAINST THE OMBUDSMAN’S ORDER DATED 10.08.2011 Kindly refer to notice No. PS/Secy A&RA/1-9/2012 dated 16.01.2012 issued by your good self on the subject noted above. Facts in brief are that case FIR No. 183/2004 was registered against the complainant/accused namely Ch. Muhammad Naeem, Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi Town, Lahore alongwith other co accused persons at PS ACE, Lahore Region after approval of competent authority and incomplete challan against him was submitted in the court of Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore on 02.03.2005. On 13.04.2005 complainant/accused joined investigation after obtaining interim bail and produced receipts Nos 1977 dated 24.02.2005 and 1978 dated 25.02.2005 amounting to Rs. 440000/= (3,00000+1,40000) deposited by him in the Government Treasury showing the embezzled amount due against him to the I.O with his free consent which were taken into possession by the I.O in presence of witnesses through recovery memo dated 13.04.2005 placed at page 317-C. On 19.04.2005 interim bail of complainant/accused was cancelled by the Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore as withdrawn and his arrest was effected by the I.O through Zimni No. 81 para NO. 1 dated 19.04.2005. The Learned Senior Special Judge Anti Corruption Lahore vide order dated 20.04.2005 sent the complainant/accused namely Muhammad Naeem Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi Town, Lahore to judicial lockup and the case is subjudic in the court of law. I have examined the case on legal as well as factual aspects and found that on prima facie proving the allegations case FIR No. 183/2004 PS ACE, Lahore was registered against the complainant/accused after approval of competent authority. During investigation sufficient incriminating material to connect the accused with the embezzlement was collected by the I.O and the recovery of Rs. 440000/- was effected from him which was produced
  • 42. by him through his free will specifically when he was on interim bail at the time of recovery so there is no element of coercion or maladministration on the part of I.O at the time of recovery as alleged in the complaint. Since the matter is subjudice in the court of competent jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of Learned Ombudsman Punjab is barred to entertain the complaint U/S 9 (1)(a) of “The Punjab Office of the Ombudsman Act,1997” which is as under:- “Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the Ombudsman: - (i) The Ombudsman may on a complaint by any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme Court or the High Court made during the course of any proceedings before it or of his own motion, undertake any investigation into any allegation of maladministration on the part of any Agency or any of its officers or employees. Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have any jurisdiction to investigate or enquiry into any matter which:- (a) are subjudice before a court of competent jurisdiction on the date of the receipt of a complaint, reference or motion by him”. In view of above, it is a fit case for filing of Representation to the Governor, Punjab Lahore U/S 32 of the Punjab Office of the Ombudsman Act,1997. Matter may therefore, be entrusted to the Learned DD(P), ACE, Lahore Region for futher proceedings but after bringing the matter into knowledge of the Worthy DG ACE, Punjab Lahore as a copy of impugned order dated 10.08.2011 has also been sent to him. Last date of limitation for filing OF Representation to the Governor, Punjab, Lahore against order dated 10.08.2011 passed by the Learned Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore is going to 09.09.2011.
  • 43. Submitted for appropriate orders please. MUNIR SHAHID Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 44. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. HAJI ABDUL REHMAN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Abdul Rehman has leveled allegation of corruption against SI Ghulam Abbas PS Muslim Town, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3151/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted and letter No. 11205 dated 01.11.2011 was sent to CCPO Lahore for enquiry which was received on 24.12.2011 and allegation against Ghulam Abbas SI proved in the said enquiry conducted by Superintendent of Police Investigation Iqbal Town, Lahore. That respondent approved regular enquiry against Ghulam Abbas SI vide regular enquiry No. 69/2012 dated 28.01.2012 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Inv) on 07.02.2012. The investigating officer has issued notice for 16.02.2012. The petitioner may approach to the investigating officer for recording his statement and matter will be decided after hearing both the parties on merit. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 45. ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE To The Deputy Director (Legal), Directorate of Anti Corruption Establishment, Punjab, Lahore. No.ACE-LR-2012/ Dated:- Subject: SUBMISSION OF REPORT REGARDING COMPLAINT NO. 738-OPK-11 & 1830-OPK-11 IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. Respected Sir, It is submitted that petition u/s 22-A & 22-B filed by Mst. Horran Bibi W/o Nazar Khan is pending before Mr. Muhammad Ijaz Butt Addition District & Sessions Judge Lahore in which next date of hearing is fixed on 10.02.2012. Final report regarding complaint No. 738-OPK-11 & 1830-OPK-11 is required by the verbal order of the Court. Kindly depute any officer to submit the same in the court and oblige. Submitted please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment Lahore Region Lahore
  • 46. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. SHAMS-UD-DIN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC. Respectfully Sheweth:- BRIEF FACTS Brief facts of the complaint are that complainant Shams-ud- Din as alleged that Zulafiqar Patwari has received Rs. 30000/- from him as illegal gratification to record the stay order proceedings in Revenue Register and after getting the bribe he entered the stay order Vide Rapt No. 4 dated 04.09.2005 in Roznamcha. On his complaint enquiry was initiated against the said Patwari who appeared in person before enquiry officer and has denied the allegations leveled on him. After probing the matter final report was submitted by Rao Pervaiz Akhtar the then Assistant Director (Inv) on 19.12.2011. Legal branch after examining the final report and file on 05.01.2012 raised some legal objections and recommended that after re- enquiring the matter revised final report be submitted. Competent authority passed order on 11.01.2012 for compliance of objections raised by legal branch and file entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmed Assistant Director (Inv) on 13.01.2012, who is probing the matter and the same will be finalized soon. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the contempt application being based on false facts and information be kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 47. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. SHEIKH KHALID SAEED VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE REGION LAHORE ETC. REPORT IN PETITION UNDER SECTION 22-A & 22-B OF CR PC SUBMITTED BY MALIK NAVEED TARIQ ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (LEGAL) ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- That complainant submitted an application to Chief Minister Punjab which was entrusted to respondent No. 1 by PSO to Chief Minister Punjab. Wherein the applicant requested to probe the matter and take legal action against the accused persons. The complainant Sh. Khalid Saeed R/o 85-The Mall, Imtiaz Plaza vide property No. 85/108-R19-S has alleged that M/S Imran Ashraf Revenue Officer, Abdul Khaliq Qanongo, Irfan Ali Patwari Mouza Mozang Lahore. He further stated that Record Keeper Data Gunj Bakhsh Town, Lahore have made forged and bogus mutation and changed the Khasra No. 2113 & 2114 of his property measuring 6 Marla 24 Sqft, in-connivance with his opponent party and revenue functionaries in-connivance with the beneficiaries issued Fard for sale of property in Khasra No. 2113 through Rapt Roznamcha 831
  • 48. dated 11.08.2010 by fabricating Fard Badar No. 285 dated 29.07.2010. On the written complaint the matter was probed by the enquiry officer S.D. Khalid Deputy Director (Inv) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore vide enquiry No. 167/2011 who after hearing both the parties submitted his final report on 16.07.2011. Enquiry officer has recommended that the matter pertains to demarcation of property and parties have already invoked the jurisdiction of Civil Court, no criminal misconducts on the part of any public servant regarding preparation of Fard Badar could be substantiated during enquiry and the matter was referred to the Additional Collector, District Lahore for further necessary action as to the allegations regarding demarcation of property etc. In this regard letter No. ACE-LR-(E-167/11/L)-2011/8397 dated 10.09.2011 was sent to the Additional Collector, District Lahore wherein it is referred that:- “After due process, the Competent Authority have approved that the matter may be referred to your good office at your own end as to the allegations regarding demarcation of property etc. under intimation to this office”. PRAYER: Under the circumstances, petition being without any lawful cause of action, is prayed to be disposed of. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 49. BEFORE MR.ISRAR AHMED THE LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2016/11 SUBMITTED BY CH. MUHAMMAD NAEEM. Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to notice No. 2016-11 dated 14.11.2011on the subject noted above. It is submitted that case FIR No. 183/04 was registered against the complainant/accused namely Ch. Muhammad Naeem, Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi town, Lahore alongwith other co-accused persons at PS ACE, Lahore Region after approval of competent authority and incomplete challan against him was submitted in the court of Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore on 02.03.2005. On 13.04.2005 complainant/accused joined investigation after obtaining interim bail and produced receipts Nos. 1977 dated 24.02.2005 and 1978 dated 25.02.2005 amounting to Rs. 440000/-(300000+140000) deposited by him in the Government Treasury showing the embezzled amount due against him to the I.O with his free consent which were taken into possession by the I.O in presence of witnesses through recovery memo dated 13.04.2005. On 19.04.2005 interim bail of complainant/accused was cancelled by the Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore as withdrawn and his arrest was effected by the I.O through Zimni No. 81 para No. 01 dated 19.04.2005. The Learned Senior Special Judge Anti Corruption, Lahore vide order dated 20.04.2005 sent the complainant/accused namely Muhammad Naeem Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi, Lahore to judicial lockup and the case is subjudice in the court of law. The order dated 10.08.2011 passed by your good self as to the exclusion of the name of complainant namely Ch. Muhammad Naeem from the subject enquiry has been challenged thorough representation/appeal before the Honorable Governor Province of Punjab, Lahore which is pending for adjudication. MUNIR SHAHID Representative
  • 50. Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 51. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. SHAMS-UD-DIN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC. PARAWISE REPLY ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. 01 Respectfully Sheweth:- 1. That the contents of para No. 01 are admitted to extent that the petition was filed by the petitioner and the Honorable Court was pleased to pass an order dated 20.09.2011. 2. That the contents of para No. 2 are correct to extent that in compliance of court order dated 20.09.2011, Enquiry bearing No. 555/2011 initiated in the Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore and on 06.10.2011 the petitioner and defendant No. 02 put their attendance on the order sheet. 3. That the contents of para 03 are totally false and frivolous as it is mentioned in para No. 02 that enquiry bearing No. 555/2011 has already been initiated against respondent No. 02 who has dully made his appearance on 06.10.2011. Copy of order sheet is annexed for kind perusal of this Honorable Court which is reflective of the fact that the respondent No. 02 has marked his attendance. 4. That the contents of para No. 04 are vehemently denied being false.
  • 52. 5. That the role of respondent No. 02 whether he has committed forgery by entering wrong mutation or not shall be determined during the course of enquiry. 6. That the contents of para No. 06 are fabricated as respondent No. 02 appeared in the enquiry firstly on 06.10.2011, 26.10.2011, 19.11.2011, 21.11.2011 and lastly on 28.11.2011. 7. Legal. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the contempt application being based on false facts and information be kindly be dismissed. Deputy Director (Inv-III) On behalf of respondent (No. 01) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 53. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMAD THE LEARNED CONSULTANT OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB, LAHORE. REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2988/2011 SUBMITTED BY MALIK MUHAMMAD SAQIB ANJUM. Respectfully Sheweth I have honor to refer to your notice No. 2988/2011 dated 29.10.2011 on the subject noted above. The above titled complaint does not pertain to Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region rather the same relates to District Narowal which falls within jurisdiction of Anti Corruption Establishment, Gujranwala Region, Gujranwala. It is therefore, requested that further correspondence in the matter may be made with the concerned office. Deputy Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. No.ACE-LR-2011/ Dated:- A Copy is forwarded to the Director (Legal), Anti Corruption Establishment, Punjab, Lahore for information with reference to his memo No. DG-ACE-DIR-L-(79)-2011/17865 dated 12.11.2011. Deputy Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 54. IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION LAHORE. In Re: - Anwaar Hussain Vs The State CASE FIR NO. 55/2008 PS, DACE, LAHORE. Subject: APPLICATION FOR GRANTING TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF CHALLAN U/S 173 CR PC. Respectfully Sheweth:- 1. That the above titled petition is pending adjudication before this Honorable Court and is fixed for submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC for today. 2. That the investigation of case FIR No.55/2008 has been entrusted to investigating team comprising of undersigned Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore by the competent authority vide order dated 19.10.2011. 3. That the case is complicated and in order to conclude the investigation evidence is required to be collected as allegedly huge loss to Government exchequer is involved. 4. That interest of justice demand that the investigation be based on proper evidence and for this purpose appropriate time is required. In view of above circumstances, it is very humbly prayed that further appropriate time may be granted for finalization of investigation and submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC in the best interest of justice. Deputy Director (Inv-I), Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore Deputy Director (Legal), Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 55. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. In Re: - Muhammad Shahbaz Vs The Additional Director Anti Corruption Lahore Petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC Report on behalf of respondent Respectfully Sheweth:- The facts in brief are that the petitioner submitted a complaint against Amanat Ullah ASI PS Shahdara Lahore under the allegation voiced in the petition. On the receipt of the complaint the matter has been referred to the CCPO for obtaining his comments and report alongwith the counter version of the ASI. On the receipt of the comments/ report and counter version of the ASI, further proceedings will be conducted in accordance with law and rules. The petitioner is premature and is liable to be dismissed. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 57. IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION LAHORE. In Re: - Anwaar Hussain Vs The State CASE FIR NO. 55/2008 PS, DACE, LAHORE. Subject: APPLICATION FOR GRANTING TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF CHALLAN U/S 173 CR PC. Respectfully Sheweth:- 5. That the above titled petition is pending adjudication before this Honorable Court and is fixed for submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC for today. 6. That the investigation of case FIR No.55/2008 has been entrusted to investigating team comprising of undersigned Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore by the competent authority vide order dated 19.10.2011. 7. That the case is complicated and in order to conclude the investigation evidence is required to be collected as allegedly huge loss to Government exchequer is involved. 8. That interest of justice demand that the investigation be based on proper evidence and for this purpose appropriate time is required. In view of above circumstances, it is very humbly prayed that further appropriate time may be granted for finalization of investigation and submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC in the best interest of justice. Deputy Director (Legal), Deputy Director (Inv-I), Anti Corruption Establishment, Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 58. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. In Re:- Muhammad Alyas Vs Deputy Director Anti Corruption Lahore Petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC Report on behalf of respondent Respectfully Sheweth:- The contention of the petitioner contained in para 2 of the petition is not correct because the application/complaint annexed with the petition has never been received in ACE. It is therefore, requested that the petitioner may be directed to attend the ACE alongwith the complaint supported by an affidavit for further action by the ACE in accordance with ACE Rules 1985. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  • 59. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. Maqsood Ahmed VS DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC. Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the complaint filed by Maqsood Ahmed against Muhammad Yousaf Khokhar etc are that the father of the complainant Muhammad Jahangir was owner of property No. NE-XVI-153-S-15/1/RH, who has died and now the property is in possession of his legal heirs. Malik Muhammad Ijaz by giving heavy bribe to excise inspector Muhammad Yousaf Khokhar got prepared a forged PT-1 S-No.5307/1 dated: 01-01-2006 in his name. The complainant requested that the same may be cancelled. On receipt of this complaint the same was marked as complaint No.1744/2011 in the Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. After due process and probe the competent authority vide his order that dated: 02-06-2011 directed to refer the same to the department and incompliance of that order the instant complaint was referred to Director General Excise and Taxation vide this office Memo,No.ACE- LR(C-1744)/2011-4768 dated 10-06-2011 for disposal at their end. The complaint has been referred to Excise Department on 02.06.2011 where as the order of this Honourable court was passed on 03-06-2011. In view of the above mentioned circumstances now the complaint is lying with Director General Excise and Taxation for its adjudication. It is humbly prayed that petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 60. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. ABDUL AZIZ VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- With profound respect it is humbly submitted that due to the non receipt of the copy of petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC, the report/comments have not been submitted in this Honorable Court. It is therefore, requested that the copy of the petition may kindly be ordered to be supplied so that the comments/report could be submitted. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 61. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMMAD MAJEED VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE. Respectfully Sheweth:- With profound respect it is humbly submitted that due to the non receipt of the copy of petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC, the report/comments have not been submitted in this Honorable Court. It is therefore, requested that the copy of the petition may kindly be ordered to be supplied so that the comments/report could be submitted. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  • 62. To The Worthy Director Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Subject: CASUAL LEAVE Respected Sir, With due respect and profound regards it is submitted that I have to go to Layyah to look after my father. So, I can not attend the office on 09.04.2012 to 10.04.2012. Kindly grant me two days casual leave with permission to leave the station. I shall be highly thankful to you. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore L/DDL:-