Bioceramics are materials which include Alumina, Zirconia, Bioactive glass, Glass ceramics, Hydroxyapatite, resorbable Calcium phosphates.
Used in dentistry for
Filling up bony defects
Root repair materials
Apical fill materials
Aids in regeneration etc.
Bioinert: non-interactive with biological systems (Alumina, zirconia)
Bioactive: durable tissues that can undergo interfacial interactions with surrounding tissue (bioactive glasses, bioactive glass ceramics, hydroxyapatite, calcium silicates)
Biodegradable: soluble or resorbable, eventually replaced or incorporated into tissue (Tricalcium phosphate, Bioactive glasses).
1. BIOCERAMIC IN DENTISTRY
PRESENTED BY-
DR. NAKUL PATIDAR
DEPT. OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND
ENDODONTICS
SARVAPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN UNIVERSITY
BHOPAL, MADHYA PARADESH
2. CONTENTS
Introduction
Classification
Bioceramic in endodontics
Calcium silicate based
Portland
MTA
Biodentine
Mixuture of calcium silicate and phosphate
Calcium enriched mixture
Endosequence
Conclusion
3. INTRODUCTION
Bioceramics are materials which include Alumina, Zirconia, Bioactive glass, Glass ceramics,
Hydroxyapatite, resorbable Calcium phosphates.
Used in dentistry for
Filling up bony defects
Root repair materials
Apical fill materials
Aids in regeneration etc.
4. CLASSIFICATION
Bioinert: non-interactive with biological systems (Alumina, zirconia)
Bioactive: durable tissues that can undergo interfacial interactions with
surrounding tissue (bioactive glasses, bioactive glass ceramics,
hydroxyapatite, calcium silicates)
Biodegradable: soluble or resorbable, eventually replaced or
incorporated into tissue (Tricalcium phosphate, Bioactive glasses).
5. ADVANTAGES
Excellent biocompatibility
Intrinsic osteoinductive capacity
Function as a regenerative scaffold
Excellent hermetic seal
Good radiopacity
Antibacterial properties
6. BIOCERAMIC IN ENDODONTICS
CALCIUM SILICATE BASED –
CEMENTS-
Portland Cement,
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA),
Biodentine (Septodont, France)
SEALERS –
Endo CPM Sealer (EGO SRL, Buenos Aires, Argentina)
MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Brazil),
BioRoot RCS (Septodont, France)
TechBiosealer (Profident, Kielce, Poland).
7. BIOCERAMIC IN ENDODONTICS
CALCIUM PHOSPHATES/ TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE/ HYDROXYAPATITE
BASED
Mixture of calcium silicates and calcium phosphates –
i-Root SP (Innovative Bioceramix Inc., Vancouver, Canada),
EndoSequence BC Sealer (Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA)/
Bioaggregate (Innovative Bioceramix Inc., Vancouver, Canada)
Capseal I and II
8. CALCIUM SILICATE BASED BIOCERAMICS
Portland Cement
In 1824, Joseph Aspdin patented - Portland cement (PC) obtained from
the calcination of the mixture of lime stones.
Inexpensive
Limitation:-
PC released- Higher amount of lead and arsenic released
Higher solubility
Excessive setting expansion
9. PORTLAND VS MTA
PORTLAND CEMENT MTA
Discoloration Higher
Solubility Higher
Bioactivity Higher
Particle size Larger Smaller
Antibacterial
properties
Similar Similar
Sealing ability Similar Similar
Biocompatibility Similar Similar
Biomineralization Better
10. MTA
Dr.Torabinejad in 1993.
Osseoconductive , inductive and biocompatible
Types-
White MTA
Grey MTA
Composition
Indication
12. MTA
Powder Liquid ratio- 3:1
Setting time:-
Initial setting time- 165 min (Pathways of pulp; cohen’s 11 th edition)
Final setting time- less than 6 hours (Pathways of pulp; cohen’s 11 th edition)
pH-
Initial-10.2
Final-12.5
References- Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Calcium silicate–based cements in mineral trioxide aggregate: Properties and clinical applications. Hoboken,
NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
13. Push bond strength:-
5.2-9.0 Mpa (24 hr- 7 days) {Aggarwal V et al.)
Sufficient thickness (4 mm) offer more resistance than lesser one (1mm)
Flexural strength:-
14.26 Mpa (Walker et al)
Microleakage:-
Good sealing ability
Reference- Walker MP, Diliberto A, Lee C. Effect of setting conditions on mineral trioxide aggregate flexural strength. J Endod
2006;32(4):334-336.
14. Particle size- White MTA finer particle
Biocompatibility
Non-mutagenic
Non-neurotoxic
Anti-inflammatory effects on pulp tissue
Cementoconductive
Cementoinductive
Osteoconductive
15. DISADVANTAGE OF MTA
Limitations-Long setting time
Difficult handling and high cost
Potential tooth discoloration.
Absence of a known solvent for this material
Difficulty of its removal after placement
16. MTA FILLAPEX
Two paste system
Adiitionally contain-
Salicylate resin
Diluent resin
Silica
Bismuth oxide
Film thickness- 24 um
Flow- 25,29 mm
17. BIODENTINE (CALCIUM SILICATE CEMENT)
Calcium silicate cement- Introduced by Septodent -2009
Setting reaction- Similar to MTA
Calcium carbonate acts as a nucleation gel
Hydrosoluble polymer- improve handling and decrease viscosity
Working time- 6 min
Setting time-
Initial – 9-12 min
Final - 45 min
18. BIODENTINE OVER MTA
Biodentine has
Ensures improved handling
Exhibits better mechanical properties than MTA.
Does not require a two-step restoration procedure as in the case of MTA.
As the setting is faster, there is a lower risk of bacterial contamination than
with MTA.
19. CALCIUM PHOSPHATE BASED
1971, Hench developed
Triple calcium phosphate compound used in bony defect
Bioglass= Calcium and phosphate + Glass ceramic
Chemically bounded
Classification
Porosity- Dense/Porous
Resorbability- Non Resorabable/ Resorabable
Used as bone graft material and pulp capping, sealer
Limitation- lack of strength, fracture during load bearing condition
20. CALCIUM PHOSPHATE BASED SEALER
Capseal I
Capseal II
Adv-
Less cytotoxicity and inflammatory mediators promote bone regeneration as root canal
sealers.
Facilitate the periapical dentoalveolar and alveolar healing.
Diadv- Capseal I is not biocompatible.
21. MIXTURE CA SILICATE & CA PHOSPHATE
BIOAGGREGATE
Composition-
Nanoparticle size tricalcium silicate
Tatalum oxide
Calcium phosphate
Silicon dioxide
Biocompatibility- demonstrated by deposition of hydroxyapetidde
22. DIFFERENCE BTW MTAAND BIOAGGREGATE
MTA BIOAGGREGATE
Composition D/F Aluminium Phosphorus
Calcium ion release Low early ion release High early ion release
Reactivity Higher Slower
Biocompatibility Less More
Sealing ability Less More
Fracture resistance Less More
Acidic resistance Less More
Reference- Raghavendra SS, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM, Kotadia P. Bioceramics in endodontics–a review. Journal of Istanbul University
Faculty of Dentistry. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S128.
23. ENDOSEQUENCE ROOT REPAIR MATERIAL/
i-Root SP
i-Root SP
Calcium silicate, monobasic calcium phosphate, zirconium oxide, tantalum oxide
and filler agents
Working time- 30 min
Setting time- 4 hrs
Leakage is more than MTA (Hischberg CS et al)
ERRM similar bacterial activity as MTA
Its biocompatible
Reference- Hirschberg CS, Patel NS, Patel LM, Kadouri DE, Hartwell GR. Comparison of sealing ability of MTA and EndoSequence
Bioceramic Root Repair Material: a bacterial leakage study. Quintessence Int. 2013 May 1;44(5):e157-62.
24. CROSS REFERENCES
A systematic review intended to compare the biocompatibility and sealing ability of
mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and biodentine as root-end filling material.
12 In-vitro study included
Biocompatibility- 2 article- biodentine better, 2 article- comparable
Sealing ability- 6 article- biodentine better, 1 article MTA is better, 1 article comparable
Conclusion- good sealing ability of biodentine along with its favorable biological
properties show that materials can be used competently in clinical practice.
Solanki NP, Venkappa KK, Shah NC. Biocompatibility and sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine
as root-end filling material: A systematic review. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2018 Jan;21(1):10.
25. USE OF BIOCERAMIC
Repair, retrograde filling, pulpotomy, resorption,
Apexification, regenerative endodontics.
Restorative uses- Dentin substitute, pulp capping,
Dentin hypersensitivity, dentin remineralization.
Prosthetic uses- Prosthetic device
Surgical uses – joint replacements, fill surgical bone
26. CONCLUSION
While MTA was the benchmark in bioceramic materials advances have constantly tried to
overcome disadvantages and improve its properties.
Bioceramics now have a wide array of applications both in endodontic and restorative
dentistry.
An up-to-date knowledge of these new bioactive materials is essential to ensure the selection
of the most suitable material in different clinical situations.
27. REFERENCES
1. Textbook of Pathways of pulp (Cohens, 11 edition)
2. Textbook of Endodontics (Ingles, 6 th edition)
3. Texbook of Endodontic practice (Grossman, 13 edition)
4. Raghavendra SS, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM, Kotadia P. Bioceramics in endodontics–a review.
Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S128.
5. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Calcium silicate–based cements in mineral trioxide aggregate:
Properties and clinical applications. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
6. Tyagi S, Mishra P, Tyagi P. Evolution of root canal sealers: An insight story. European
Journal of General Dentistry. 2013 Sep 1;2(3):199.
28. 7. Solanki NP, Venkappa KK, Shah NC. Biocompatibility and sealing ability of mineral
trioxide aggregate and biodentine as root-end filling material: A systematic review.
Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2018 Jan;21(1):10.